Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello, my friends.
Welcome to the Kyle Serafin Show.
Today is Tuesday. It's July the 15th.
Appreciate you joining me here today.
I just saw a great line in our live chat that is running.
We are running right now on rumble.com/kyle Serafin.
You can find us there. You can find us over on X if you
want to find us live. It's at 0930.
If you're listening after the fact and you're thinking, hey,
this sounds like it might be kind of fun to see what other
people are saying in the moment. Join us over there.
Join us on Rumble, Join us on YouTube.
The YouTube chat is also going. We've got 100 plus messages of
people that have been getting started before the program is
even rolling. And the message I just saw is
how many of you just learned that the word den new mole was a
word in English? It's a French word.
Actually. It's a literary term.
Some of you might have even gone out and Googled it because
you're curious. And I appreciate that.
I may not have the biggest audience, but we tend to have
the most inquisitive, the most honest, and I think we have
probably closer to the smartest audience out there when it comes
down to it. So thank all of you for being
here. Den DuMont is the falling
action. For those of you who are
literary scholars or people who even remember maybe high school
English. For you, Den DuMont is the the
end of the movie. It's the end of the story.
When the loose ends are tied up, when the plot twist has
happened, the climax has been reached and we are falling down
to the end of the story, whatever that is.
What if we've already lost this war?
I think that's something that many of us, that's the thing we
struggle with. How do you get up in the
morning? Put your feet on the ground and
carry on even though the battle is losing.
The upside, I think if you're a Christian, I'm making this
connection in real time with you.
The upside is that Christians already know that the battle on
earth is supposed to be lost. They're not supposed to win
here. That's not the goal.
Maybe maybe that's the the the redeeming light is that if you
follow Christ, you believe that that's what is that's what's
destined to happen. There's no justice on earth.
We find it all the time. I cannot tell you how many
emails and D Ms. I get from people asking me, can you help
me get justice? I have a problem with Child
Protective Services. I have a problem with this
government agency. I had this theft happen and
nobody will will investigate it. How will you help me get
justice? I don't have the ability to get
you justice. I can't even get justice for my
own friends or my own family. I think that's actually the
point. You don't get justice here.
If you aspire to justice on earth, you will be disappointed.
And my friends that have accepted the fate of, of being a
person that goes out in the public and tries to ask for
something and you think that you might get it and you have all
the indications that could be there.
You think that you actually voted your way out of something.
They all end up saying, you know, these people will will pay
in another life and we'll be vindicated in another life.
It's really hard. It's really hard because it's
the opposite of what we think in America, that you have agency
and the ability to affect change on earth.
And we have a really good system.
And like all things that are man made, we screwed it up and we
screwed it up long before we were born.
How many of us pay for the sins of our fathers, fathers, fathers
going all the way back? It turns out we're paying for
the original sin of pride of of aspiring to be God, which is the
sin took place in the Garden of Eden.
All right, that's enough theology on it.
We're going to also talk about the Bill of Rights, but I want
to actually kind of hone in on this topic.
The the losing war against multiculturalism, against
Marxism, against communism. I think they're all the same
thing. They were an attempt to delude
and to to dilute Americans into thinking that their system owed
everybody something and not even the people who actually lived
here when we started serving a constituency of the globe and
not ourselves. So when you hear Alex Jones and
others scream about the globalists, it means you didn't
focus in on your own family, your own backyard.
And there is a really important nature of that.
That's not to say you're tribal. It means you care about things
that are near to you, the people you can actually see.
You can't affect the entire world.
That's hubris. And there is an American hubris.
All right, so that's that. Let's talk about my buddies real
quickly over at Patriot Coolers. They do affect the things that
are near and dear to you. How about our veterans that
stepped up and lost mobility, have the inability to move
around in their own homes. Every purchase you make for my
friends over at Patriot Coolers, it's Patriot coolers.com.
Every purchase you make is going to go a small percentage of that
is going to go back in. And at the the the rate of
hundreds of thousands of dollars a year.
They donate back to mobility services for veterans.
They help retrofit houses. So our vets who were injured on
the job, serving this nation, defending the things that we all
believe in, whether or not those wars were sold to us on a, on an
honest platform, the people who went there went there in good
faith to do so. And Patriot Coolers backs our
vets. That's why they have the colors
red, white and blue. I've got one right now.
It may have an upside down flag, but it's our flag nonetheless.
And you guys can check out Patriot coolers.com, the promo
code Kyle saves you 10%. Check out their tumblers, get
them engraved with your message of choice.
You can get one from the suspendables collection, which
is in the link below. That's the show description.
You can check it out. Promo code Kyle saves you 10
percent, 50 bucks or more. You're going to get free
shipping. They're good people.
They're out of Houston, TX. They're an American success
story and they've been with us since the beginning, which I'm
very appreciative of. I, I cannot tell you how nice it
is to know that there are people that stand with us.
They even send me when someone sends them a nasty message and
says how could you stand with a bigoted person like Kyle
Therapin? They just send it to me and they
laugh and they say we support veterans.
Thanks so much. I'm one of those two.
All right, folks, we're going to get into today's program right
now. Let's see what we got with some
news and then maybe some long term commentary on Denimo.
All right, all right, all right, let's see here.
How about how about people that are not necessarily honorable
veterans? Some real questions here.
I've had a number of folks who served with Corey Mills.
We've had our Sprint Steve Baker on from the Blaze, who's been
talking about his long story about some of the shenanigans.
The what we call this, I'm, I'm trying to be very delicate with
my words. The misleading nature of Corey
Mills, congressman from Florida. He apparently got himself some
front page news from NBC because his landlord is seeking to evict
him. He's a Republican congressman
and he has unpaid rent in his DC apartment.
And that might not be the most shocking part of it because this
country's always had people that are quote, UN quote elites that
have been in Congress, the very wealthy and they've often times
showed up. They're very wealthy.
We don't really necessarily have a problem with that.
The people who have the time and the, the leisure to be able to
go out and be our Congress people and serve.
I, I'm, I'm appreciative of that.
Actually. I don't want to go and do that
Doesn't sound like a fun job to me.
And it certainly helps to have a little bit of F you money,
right? As I said yesterday, and I think
you guys should probably work into your work, into your, your
lexicon. What is the purpose of F you
money if you're not able to say F you when the time arises?
The problem with some of these folks that get F you money is
they think that the money is the purpose and that gathering and
accruing and amassing more of it is the reason for getting money.
You know how many of you would take a lottery sweepstakes and
continue to show up at your job every day?
There's some that love your job. Maybe that's a great reason some
of you don't like your job and there's things that you could do
that would serve people. Maybe you would look like like
my friend Garrett O'boyle who says, OK, I no longer have a job
in law enforcement. I really like to go out and
preach. I'd like to spend my time
spreading the word of God. Maybe that's what my calling
really is. Maybe I should go back to
seminary or maybe I should go and help people seek justice by
going to law school. My friends are are are
struggling with this question. But if you had the money to not
work, would you continue to do the same thing you're doing?
It does make me wonder about guys like Corey Mills, who was
an enlisted guy in the military. He got to the the lofty rank of
Sergeant. It's not a particularly high
paid job and now is worth apparently $25 million, but it
might be quite a bit more than that.
But he's also falling down on his bills.
And I don't think that's the most crazy thing about this
story. I listened to Corey Mills
yesterday defend this. So I'm going to give the
perspective that he made. He was on a Twitter space or an
X Space last night, and he was very polished.
He's a good speaker. He's very charismatic in the way
he says it. And people look at his face and
they go, that's a handsome man, That's a bearded man.
That is an honorable man. That's an American veteran man.
That's a man who's failed to pay $85,000 in rent between March
and July. I'm going to say that one more
time so that it sinks in properly.
He owes $85,000 in rent between March and July of this year.
That's March, April, May, June. So four months and he owes
$85,000. That's a lot of money for rent.
That's 20,000 plus dollars a month not paying rent.
He claimed and I heard him say it out loud.
So this is not just NBC making this claim.
He said that there was a faulty link online for their payment
processing. And I want to go ahead and just
say the odds that a company or a a landlord was unable to rectify
the $20,000 a month income because there was a faulty
payment link sounds absurd. It sounds like a man who has
access to media. And I don't think that you're
normally going to find that to be a problem if you owed some,
if first of all, if I owed somebody $85,000, I'm not
waiting for a payment link. I'm proactively solving that
problem. And if somebody owed me that
kind of money and the only difference apparently that this
person called up is like, look, dude, I'm trying to get you your
money. Your link is not working.
You think that wouldn't be resolved in a period of four
plus months, 4 1/2 months? I don't believe that at all.
But that's only because I think that the things that's man has
been saying seem fraudulent based on the number of veterans
that served with him. That said, he lies like
breathing. He has all kinds of scandals
going on. There's no way.
There's no way that $85,000 in red can simply be described by a
faulty online payment link. They don't have checks where
Quarry Mill comes from. I just ordered up checks.
It took me 4 days to get new checks from my bank so that if I
needed to, I could pay something.
I could drive down to my bank right now and get them to print
off checks for my business. I could happen today no problem
whatsoever. Chase will do it.
USAA will do it. All the banks I'm aware of will
print you a check, but a payment link is too much for you.
He couldn't get a staffer to go solve that problem.
He couldn't call it in and have it mailed out.
You could pay 20 bucks. He couldn't wire it to somebody.
This is nonsense. This is a nonsensical thing.
But this tells you the kind of scruples and the kind of like,
imagine that that's where you live. 20 grand a month.
By the way, there's some other people that we might be talking
about today, and I'm not going to say who they are, but you
guys can guess who live in that same building and pay that kind
of big money. These are not public servants at
this point. These people are basically
elected royalty and they treat themselves that way.
And how dare you, peasant, try to collect the rent from me.
I'm going to just go out there and make that face.
And that's the face that they actually had on NBC.
Corey Mills is facing a lawsuit seeking his eviction over
alleged failure to pay thousands of dollars in rent at a property
in Washington, DC. According to court papers and
the complaint fired in the DC Superior Court, the management
company said the congressman did not pay a total of 85,000 and $9
in rent between March and July. The monthly rent for the
property, according to court filings, is $20,000 and $833 on
top of that, so almost 21 grand a month.
Management company is asking the court to allow eviction.
You're a congressman and you're being evicted.
Wow, management company's asking for that.
The initial hearing is scheduled for September the eighth, which
means that it may even go deeper.
Of course, you should pay the damn fine.
You should pay the amount of money.
He should be ashamed of himself. He moved into the property of
June of 2023. That means he's been paying that
kind of money. And this is not his only
residence, folks. This is his residence in
Washington, DC. This is his extra residence.
In any case, all kinds of interesting things have happened
there which make him probably not the best tenant.
There's going to be some stories coming out about him.
Apparently, he also got into an alleged domestic assault that
happened in the building. There's police reports that
substantiate it. He is the congressional
representative for Florida's 7th Congressional District and he
has been since January of 2023. Not a particularly long story,
but it does tell us a little bit about the people that are out
there in the world. You've also heard from Steve
Baker that he converted to Islam, was married by a radical
imam, imam in a, in a mosque in Northern Virginia.
That when, when the mosque was named to me and it was sent over
here, I, I was absolutely shocked because I was like, Oh
yeah, I know that mosque. I know where I park when I
observe people leaving that mosque because it is
legitimately full of radical CT terrorists or CT subjects rather
that the FBI is watching. That's an interesting place for
a congressman to get get married out of.
And for those of you who are asking in our chat, because I do
occasionally keep track of what you're saying, at the same time,
yeah, there's documents behind this.
I've read all the documents. They're all available online.
If you're so interested, you can go on X, you can find them.
They're actually in my thread. I retweeted it.
But they're definitely out there.
And the the eviction documents and the claims are all out
there. And this is not the first time
that I've heard that he lives in a 20,000 or $21,000 a month
apartment. If you listen to Steve Baker,
he's also shared that The Blaze has documented this pretty well.
This is a real problem. How do you have that?
How do you represent the American people if you're kind
of like a deadbeat on your rent and you have all these kind of
things going on anyway, talking about people that are having a
bad week and are having some bad exposes.
Quickly touch on this Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino.
His future is uncertain amid fallout over the Epstein files
decision. So say sources.
This is reported by ABC News. Yesterday, CNN said that he did
go back in the building. So though for those you were
wondering, did he go back? Apparently, he went back, He is
now back in his seat and he's working at the FBI.
But his future is uncertain amid growing fallout over the Justice
Department's decision not to disclose any more records in its
investigation into deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein,
according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.
Remember, some of this stuff could be, in fact, information,
OP. But we have it on pretty good
authority that he is miserable working in that job, that he's
not there. And I guess he's gone back.
The thing that I saw that was really wild, if you're looking
at the picture on the screen right now, if you're just
listening, it's a picture of Dan Bongino walking.
He's wearing a Gray suit and a yellow tie and a light colored
kind of shirt. Looks nice.
He's got some guys behind him that are clearly special
assistants or aids. But he has his security detail
with him, which is a little bit interesting.
And one of the security detail is up in the front.
The point person that you can see, at least in this picture is
a female agent that is at least a foot shorter than Dan Bongino.
And for a guy who used to do protective work, that should
bother him. Shouldn't it bother him that we
have this DEI situation where we have, if you need protective
detail and you really need to have armed agents surrounding
you at all times, are you really going to have a woman that's a
foot shorter than you? I don't know.
Like, I wouldn't want necessarily, like, a Steve
friend as the bodyguard for a Dan Bongino, unless he's a, you
know, the quiet guy up front. Steve's not very tall.
I'm not very tall. I'm probably not the right guy
for it. I don't know.
There's something about being a bodyguard.
You're supposed to be kind of like physically imposing, having
a female that's smaller by a foot at least than the person
that they're supposed to be protecting.
Very weird. It's a bad luck.
It kind of lets you know that the cutesy time continues.
It kind of lets you know that this, this continues onward.
This this DEI sort of situation. When I told you the same people
are running the FBI that were always there, like I guarantee
you they asked for a security detail and got the security
detail that the FBI was willing to give, not the one that he
demanded. It's not great.
All right, Anyway, there's a continuing fallout.
There's all these questions about what's going on.
What will the Trump administration do regarding this
uncertain future of the Epstein files as being quoted here by by
ABC News. I think I've got one more story
here from MSNBC, which I think is actually quite interesting.
Says there are conspiracy theories that Trump
administration have have stoked over the years and they refuse
to die down. And he doesn't have very many
good options. The Epstein files problem lacks
an end game is what MSNBC says. And I don't think they're wrong
in this sort of thing. The Democrats have seized on a
weak moment. They see an opportunity right
now and they're like, all right, the mag of people are upset.
There was a promise. The promise wasn't delivered.
Maybe we can hone in on this. And they are, they're honing in
on it in a big way. In fact, they went and they
tried to put Republicans to a decision for all their chips,
release the files by order of Congress.
Now, as far as I can tell, it's probably an executive function.
So I don't see how that works. But it doesn't mean they don't
get the headline. The headline actually pops up.
We were told there was going to be a client list.
We were told there was going to be evidence released that was
going to be part of a quote UN quote, wave of transparency.
We were told that people who are powerful, we're going to have to
pay an account. And some of that means the folks
that were responsible for Joe Biden running the administration
the way he did were supposed to pay account.
Some of the people that were involved in what was claimed to
be election fraud, but we haven't seen the evidence come
out from the government's end of it.
That's supposed to happen. There are things that need to be
righted. Where's the pipe bomber?
I want you to consider the following.
Let's assume that there is no client list.
Let's assume that Jeffrey Epstein was just a creep, but he
was no longer a creep that the evidence that they found was no
longer there. Let's say that everything that
was promised by Cash Patel and Dan Bongino prior to getting
into the office, by the way, you'll notice they didn't claim
it once they got into the office.
The things that were claimed by Pam Bondi once she became
attorney general, claimed by people like Elena Hava.
Like let's say that all the things that the campaign circuit
said before the campaign and the and the attorney general said
after the campaign, Let's say all of those things, they didn't
exist. We have a broader problem.
Your government lied to you, your government, not the Biden
administration, not the regime, not like deep state sycophants,
like I'm telling you, the attorney general who you say
this is who we elected, This is our person, This is who Donald
Trump stands by. By the way, she was hanging out
at A at a soccer game with Donald Trump yesterday.
He is not distancing himself from this woman.
That person went on television, went on Fox, looked you in the
eye and lied to you while talking to Sean Hannity, while
talking to Laura Ingraham, while talking to the others, and just
said things that are apparently false.
So whether they have an Epstein problem or they just have a
basic credibility problem where people are perfectly comfortable
saying things that are false while representing the official
position of the government, we have a problem with that.
That should bother you. It's not 3D chess.
It's not getting the Democrats to demand the list so that they
can finally release the list. Why do I know that?
Because they are already in control of the entities.
They already are the people that are at the lead.
Are they actually controlling them?
Well, no, I don't think they are.
I think that the the folks that it represent sort of the the
deep seated administrative capabilities, the DOJ and the
FBI are still in control. But nominally and with the
authority, you have an FBI director and you have a attorney
general that can make these claims, can go out there and
say, do what I say. These things are now either
declassified or they are going to be made public.
Or we are going to go out there and do a press conference and
we're going to put the people who did this investigation in
front of the press and we're going to let him answer some
questions with an attorney present to filter.
Wouldn't that be the right way you'd go about it?
Wouldn't you go out there and open a press conference and say,
look, we're going to open our books, we don't have what you
want. We over promised.
We're under delivering. We own that.
So here's what we got. Here are the people that did the
interviews. Here's the people that collected
the evidence. Here's the technicians that
handle it. They're going to tell you what
it's corrupted, what is gone, what is available.
We've authorized them to speak as freely as possible.
Here's our office of general counsel.
They're going to be here to filter any questions.
This, this press conference will go on as long as you need so
that we can get to the bottom of this and move on.
This ends today. You could do that.
You could or you could do this. You could send Laura Trump out
there to say this, which is basically, we're doing such a
great job on so many other things.
It's so hard to see it. By the way, who is Laura Trump
in the Trump administration? What official position does she
have? How many of these influencer
types are we going to see? I don't care if she's a member
of the president's family. What governmental authority does
she have to speak on behalf of this administration, which she
seems to be trying to do? And people were touting this
like this was some point of a win.
Here's a a Benny Johnson thing. She's made the rounds of
yesterday doing a couple of talks.
Of course, she sat down with Donald Trump and asked him what
he wanted to be thought of. The person who saved this
country. He won the coin toss, not
winning it back yet again. What if we already lost?
What would be your advice, you know, given, given this back and
forth? You know, we're just coming off
of turning point here in Tampa. You know, this was the topic of
conversation. What would be your advice in
order to take the temperature down on this issue from within
the administration? Well, I do think that there
needs to be more transparency on this and, and I think that that
will happen. I mean, look, I, I, I don't know
what truly exists there, but I know that this is something
that's important to the president as well.
He does want transparency on all these fronts that everything
we're talking about, because it's frustrated him as well.
He sat for four years like the rest of us did and saw a lie
after lie and saw our country just being sent down the wrong
path. And it was, it was really
frightening and very upsetting to a lot of people to see.
And I would actually say over the past 10 years, we've all
kind of endured this. Prior to that, it was probably
happening, Benny, but we just weren't as aware of it.
It wasn't until Donald Trump came down that golden desk
layer. Then you just kind of blew the
doors off of everything. And people starting to wake up
and realize, wait a minute, things are not as they have
always been presented to us. And I do believe that you will
see that. No, as it relates to the
president, I, I know that this is probably not his number one
thing He's focused on. He's focused on a lot of other
important things. We've got this big announcement
with Russia going on. I think as we're speaking right
now at the White House, we have, you know, a Middle East.
We're trying to get peace over there.
We're trying to make sure that Iran's nuclear arsenal is
obviously completely decimated. We want to make sure everything
is on the right track for this country.
Just please look over here, look at these other things.
Look how awesome we are. There's floods in Texas.
There's other things that are more important just because we
lied to you right up to your face and told you things that we
were going to do that we didn't do and then said to move on and
you didn't. We need you to just move on.
Remember, transparency is really important to us at the Trump
administration and transparency doesn't mean like we're going to
tell you what we know or we're going to be honest with you.
What it means is things we like. Transparency equals things we
like. We're stealing that from from
Steve friend. That's Steve friend's
prescription. Democracy means things we like.
If you're on the left, transparency things are are
things that we like. If you're on the right doesn't
mean actual transparency. Obviously it doesn't actually
mean anything about democracy back generally speaking, it's
communism. And then like transparency
actually just means like just pay attention to what we want
you to. That's what transparency is.
Transparency is please follow the laser pointer that is being
shined on the ground. That's your job.
You are our constituent, which really is the opposite of what
we think, what we really think of you as as serfs.
Do as you're told, accept what we give you and be grateful.
How dare you not be. That's kind of what's happening
here and and it's pretty nauseating for those of us that
are watching only because so many people told me, this is
where we're going to get it. This is what we voted for, This
is how it's going to be. This is where we're going to see
success. The most transparent
organization in history doesn't need to brand themselves that
way. So everybody sees it.
They just act transparently and then everyone goes like, holy
crap, what a difference. If you're all about messaging,
if you're all about explaining that, I think you're failing.
That's my take. So as we kind of black pill
ourselves into oblivion here, let's just do a quick little
reminder that if you guys are interested in, if you're
interested in surviving what comes your way and there's
always a real possibility that you might need to, you might
need to lean on a supply that exists inside your own home
because you can't lean on anybody else's supply.
Let's go ahead and do a little quick read for my friends over
at My Patriot Supply. So there you have it.
Headlines get darker everyday, whether it be global conflicts,
which Laura Trump was even talking about, shaky supply
lines. We know that there are
logistical issues in the United States.
They've been exposed in our last five years.
A power grid could become unstable.
Who knows what's going on? You get floods and other crazy
stuff. If you're always worried about
one crisis away from total chaos, then you can go ahead and
take steps to hedge against it. Get yourself a three month
emergency food kit. That's 90 days of insurance
policy that you own, that you bring in your own house.
My Patriot Supply is the company that we use here in the in the
Seraphin household. mypatriotsupply.com/kyle is the
website. You go get there, you're going
to get a special deal that is exclusive to our listeners.
Again, 2000 calories a day, three full months, meals that
last up to 25 years. You can store them.
You just keep them out of sunlight.
You can take them with you. You can put all 90 and 90 days
in one place. You can break them up in
different little food caches if you are so inclined.
You can make sure that you are prepaired so you don't have to
worry about repair if the next crisis hits.
You don't want to wait till the store shelves are empty.
You want to make sure that at least if it all goes wrong,
you're not going to go hungry. That is a real thing.
You don't have to be a prepper to like this kind of stuff.
You can just look out there and listen to the news that we do
every day. There's not a lot of like
fantastic news that are happening.
In fact, every bit of good news has at least one thing of bad
news as far as I can tell, and maybe worse.
Again, check out mypatriotsupply.com slash Kyle
mypatriotsupply.com/kyle and get yourself hooked up with a three
month emergency food kit that is a great hedge against it.
It's sourced, packed, prepared in the United States.
Many of the products they're making are actually vertically
integrated, which means they control it from start to finish.
Good stuff. And check out my friends over
there as we do it. Let's finish with this little
Epstein sort of problem. It is a problem.
I'm going to give you 2 pieces of it.
One, Democrats attempting to capitalize it.
Do I think that these people are honest brokers?
Absolutely not. I do not.
I do not think that these people are operating in good faith.
It doesn't mean that the thing that they're saying is wrong.
In fact, it's probably the exact opposite.
They want to align with some pieces of like the the Trump
base who do think this is a problem and they want to make
those people now have to defend themselves for agreeing with
Democrats. No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
There are two reasons that you could do something, 1 can be for
the right thing and 1 can be for the wrong thing, and you could
still be asking for the same outcome.
So very clearly, let me say, if you want these things addressed
because you have the good intention of saying transparency
is good, our government knows us answers.
We were told something and it hasn't happened, that's fine.
If you want to do it because you want to hurt Donald Trump,
you're a jerk, but you're still aligned with me.
That's fine, right? Remember, you can vote for a
bill because it it gives you what you want.
You could vote for a bill because it's going to get you
closer to what you want. You can vote against the bill
because it doesn't do good things, or you can vote because
it doesn't do enough of the bad things, because you wanted more
bad things. There can be two reasons for the
same sort of decision. Let's go ahead and listen to
this MSNBC hit. They're bringing on Ro Khanna,
who introduced this. I think it's kind of a kind of a
dunk, but it doesn't look good that all Republicans except one
said, yeah, we don't want this stuff not not from Congress.
Even a symbolic vote. It does look bad.
In a committee for breaking news, the Republican controlled
House Rules Committee has just voted to block the release of
the Epstein files. Joining us now, the member of
Congress who forced that vote, Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna
of California. Congressman, kind of give us the
latest situation with the House Rules Committee.
Well, it's very disappointing. I had a very simple amendment
that the full Epstein files should be released.
It went for a vote to the House Rules Committee.
Jim McGovern, who is the ranking member for House Democrats, made
sure that all four Democrats voted for the release.
Ralph Norman, a Republican, actually joined with the
Democrats saying that the there should be a vote on the full
release. Chip Roy didn't show up for the
vote, but seven other Republicans locked it.
So as of now, there is going to be no vote tomorrow, up or down
vote on whether the I've seen file should be released.
And this was the first stage of your attempt to get a full vote
by the House of Representatives to see a full recorded vote.
Everyone could see how their member of Congress voted on this
issue. And that's what was blocked by
the Rules Committee, not allowing you to get to that
stage on the floor. I really, really hate this
tactic. By the way, this is an aside,
but I think it's relevant. When you watch these, these
presented news hosts, they're so desperate to tell you how smart
they are that they tell the guest what the guest was going
to say. That man was not in the room.
I've seen the video too. Like, I could do that.
But that's not why you brought the guest on, is it?
You brought a freaking congressman on and now you're
telling him what he sat through and you didn't.
Why do they do that? It does show you how fake all of
this is. It's people trading back and
forth their lines. I don't know.
I I really Despite that this is I think how the average American
feels about this. Many average Americans feel as
this man Travis does. He called in to Glenn Beck show
yesterday. This was thrown out on the web.
I like this clip because it you can tell this man is not
operating from a political space.
He's just a person and he feels betrayed.
And that's what it feels like when you expected something,
when you put trust in someone, even if they didn't deserve it,
and they go back and they do the opposite of what they told you
they would do what you'd expected to do.
And it comes in. It's one thing to walk into a
fight, know you're about to get hit in the face, get hit in the
face and walk away and go, man, that sucked.
I just got hit in the face. It's quite another to be
standing still in a grocery line and someone come up and punch
you in the face like a sucker punch.
That's a betrayal of the trust that we have in our society.
This man Travis is is he's expressing that that betrayal
that's only happening when you actually expected something
better to happen and you didn't get it.
We go to Travis in South Dakota. Hello, Travis.
Hi, Glenn. Hi, Jason.
I tell you what, guys, I feel really betrayed and I feel
really, really angry. We have a president who tells us
to move on from Epstein because it doesn't matter.
Are you guys still talking about this seriously?
And yet he still talks about the yet he still talks about the
2020 election fraud. He talks about the Hunter Biden
laptop. He talks about all this stuff
from 5-6 years ago. And he tells us to move on from
the Epstein trial or the Epstein case.
I people like me, will not stop talking about this.
I feel so. Betrayed and so angry.
This is not what I voted for. If we do not stand up for the
children of this country, we have nothing.
We have absolutely nothing. And I tell you what, I've also
lost a lot of respect for a lot of people that are prominent
figures in this country because they are saying, you know what,
this doesn't matter. Like Kerry late came out on
Saturday. She's like, you know what, what
really matters is election fraud and post election fraud.
It's like, you know what? The children.
Of this. Country really, really matter.
How could we just sweep? Them under the rug and not care.
Move on, America, move on. Travis, thank you for calling.
Let me ask you what is there anything that could be said that
would make you go, OK, that's as good as it's going to get?
We're going to play you. Some of the people that think
they're telling you that's as good as it's going to get and
they are not convincing to me. I find it pretty offensive
actually, if I'm being honest about it.
I don't feel good about it at all.
Yesterday, although he doesn't follow me on on, on XI had
Charlie Kirk reach out and try to correct the record.
I made a sarcastic post saying, I apologize, I didn't get the
update that we were done talking about this.
And I, I did, I went ahead and spent 50% of my podcast talking
about this problem. And then you've got, you got
Charlie Kirk who decided that he needed to weigh in with me,
which is quite interesting to me, honestly.
It's, it's an unusual thing to do.
So the question then is, well, what do we do about it?
Can we excuse it away? What if we had our best
influencers out on the on the case?
What if we put the people there to talk about it?
Now we've got a breakdown between sort of the Con Inc and
the people who have decided to set themselves as opposition,
who I also think are part of the same establishment.
This is Megyn Kelly, who's friends with Dan Bongino and has
told us she wants to defend that.
She's kind of aligned herself with one group of folks and
she's going to go up against Ben Shapiro.
So we're going to see our champions fight each other
politely, talk about what is and what is not there.
You'll notice what they're talking about is whether or not
he killed himself. They're not talking about the
reality of what's most important, which is whether or
not our administration lied to us, what they're going to do
about it to regain credibility. And is there going to be
justice? If there was in fact, crimes
committed, were those things covered up?
They're not talking about that. They they take it down to a
different level. So once again, distract.
Distract if possible. Now we're working in the realm
of the young. You're not.
But you're look, Ben, you can't come to me and say everybody I
know says he killed himself. And then I respond saying I
actually have my own sources who say he didn't.
And then you say, well, your sources are no, not valid
because they won't put their names on it.
OK, who are your sources? Let's go down the list and then
we'll talk about why they might be saying that.
My sources are the president of the United States, the vice
President of the United States, Cash Patel, the head of the FBI,
Dan Bongino, the deputy head of the FBI, and Pam Bondi, the
attorney general. And those aren't just my
sources, they're everybody's sources because they publicly
came out and said this. OK, Trump hasn't specifically
weighed in on that specific aspect of it.
We've all seen the limited things that Trump has said and
tweeted on this, and JD Vance was calling for transparency and
suggesting otherwise prior to taking office.
He hasn't commented on this so far, so he's not.
One of the sources you've got cash.
You've got Dan and you've got Pam and we've already discussed
that memo in in full detail. I'm talking about people behind
the scenes who prior to, to this to, to Trump taking office.
I'm not going to get too specific, but trust me, I have
high level sources who have said they don't believe any of that,
any of that. So, and I'm not going to out
them for purposes of convincing you, but you're telling me name
them. I no, I'm not going to.
I don't have authorization. And then you say, well, I
dismiss all of that because you won't name them.
Hold on Megan, I'm not saying you should name them.
I'm saying they should name themselves because otherwise
they are being complicit in one of the greatest cover ups in the
history. That's.
Easy for you to say then That's very easy to say.
OK, so because you'll have your job and you'll have your
millions wouldn't no matter what they.
Do, Megan, give me a break. If somebody came out today and
they were a whistleblower on the greatest scandal in the history
of the American Republic, they would make more money tomorrow
than in in their entire life working for the FBI.
That's that's an interesting thing to say.
Ben Shapiro, you've never called once to talk to me or to Steve
Friend or to care to Boyle or to any FBI whistleblower as far as
I can tell, Maybe not. Maybe that's not true.
That The Daily Wire actually
would believe that. Why would you believe that?
They would make more money simply because they said
something out loud that was true, that was that was going
against that, that helps take down evil.
Some of us have actually done that.
It doesn't work. I kind of lean on this camera.
I'm telling you, don't trust anyone, me included.
We don't bring receipts, throw it out the window.
I'm telling you, don't trust anyone, me included.
We don't bring receipts. Throw it out the window.
Oh, that's what I meant. All right.
Well, what if we could get like, maybe one of those sane,
rational, intellectual voices to kind of talk us down?
Maybe we could have somebody who I like, I'm fairly fond of.
I think it's a nice man, you know, not a warrior, not
somebody who is ever going to go against the grain if it affects
his pocketbook, but a nice guy, likable guy.
We're going to try to convince you with such a sane and
rational voice and millions of followers.
Here we go. I'm going to talk about the
Epstein files, and I'm going to make the case that even though
there are unanswered questions about Epstein, it is in fact
time to move on. Part of being on a political
team is maintaining a certain amount of maturity, recognizing
you can't win them all, recognizing there are some
things that are important to you that are less important to the
guy that you've put in charge. Who is trying to focus on things
right in front of him? And so having a sense of
perspective, having a sense of balance, having a sense of
maturity, I think is more important even than getting to
the bottom of what really happened with Jeffrey Epstein.
Yeah. So what I need you to do is be
respectful. I need you to be mature.
I need you to be a grown up. I need you to act in a right in
the right way and move on. Please just do what you were
told to do. Yeah.
The DOJ is currently urging the Supreme Court to turn away an
Epstein accomplice to Zane Maxwell's appeal.
Just slain. Why does she have such a
difficult to pronounce name? I've never heard anyone say it
properly. And I listen to a lot of people
say it. Let's talk about this story
coming out of ABC. Former Epstein associate is
currently serving a 20 year prison sentence.
The question that has been made. And maybe we'll make a T-shirt
for it. I'm not real crazy about making
T-shirts, but I, I think I actually have a, an outlet.
There's a bunch of companies that always want me to to go in
and work with them and make T-shirts.
Could we get a justice for Just Lane T-shirt?
Would you guys be wearing that? Because doesn't it just show the
hypocrisy? Everyone's like, well, why the
hell is she in jail for trafficking to no one from
someone who didn't do anything wrong apparently.
The Justice Department on Monday asked the Supreme Court to turn
away an appeal from Just Lane Maxwell, the former associate of
sex offender Jeffrey Epstein who's currently serving a 20
year prison sentence for conspiring with and aiding
Epstein in his sexual abuse of underage girls.
Max Wolf, 63, urged the court earlier this year to review her
case, arguing with the that an unusual Co conspirator clause in
Epstein's 2007 non prosecution agreement with the federal
prosecutors in Florida barred her from any subsequent
prosecution in New York the the District Court and the appeals
court. Previously rejected this
argument. Today, the DOJ urged the High
Court to do the same thing. There's questions about whether
or not this woman would be able to come out and testify in front
of Congress. There are pros and cons that
people are trying to suggest. It does leave kind of this big
lingering question. the US solicitor general said that the
contention is incorrect. The petitioner does not show
that it would succeed in any of the appeals courts.
So they don't want this to be to taken in by the Supreme Court.
It does not want to be reviewed or they don't want it to be
reviewed. So much for our government.
Now, look, she's trying to get out.
There's been all these arguments.
Well, maybe she could go and she could, you know, kind of be
whistleblower. She could turn state's evidence.
She could give information out there and and should blow this
case wide open. That's not what she's trying to
do here. Our attorneys wrote, despite the
existence of a non prosecution agreement promising in plain
language that the United States would not prosecute any Co
conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein. the United States in fact
prosecuted just Lane Maxwell as a Co conspirator of Jeffrey
Epstein. And it was a big deal at the
time. It was a big deal that she was
the remember, she was the the one that was going to take the
fall for all this stuff. It was supposed to be the first
domino and she ended up being the only domino.
It was pretty interesting. Of course, the government
decided to push back against it. All this is to say, so we are
driving wedges because of transparency.
You have to be honest with your constituents.
You owe them that. They don't owe you loyalty.
They don't have to follow what Dinesh D'souza or Ben Shapiro or
Megyn Kelly or Dan Bongino or the attorney general has to say.
Nobody here has to do what we're told.
We can put pressure on it and the evidence of it being
effective is that Doctor Moore in Utah because of this
weakness, because we do have a a clearly populist type movement
that that has put Donald Trump where he is.
They dropped away and the word is behind the scenes for
whatever it's worth. The word being sort of sources
that will not be named. The people at the DOJ are
scrambling. They are looking desperately to
find any high profile prosecution that they can use to
be able to draw attention away from this.
They are looking for a bigger red dot laser pointer to put on
the ground so that you, as all the the good cats that you are,
will attack the carpet where they want you to and move on.
Anything that they can do to get you to take your attention away.
And the biggest and most probable one, they floated out
the conspiracy possibility of the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax.
And maybe we can go after Brennan and Clapper.
And that didn't really go very well.
It's kind of like mediocre. The problem is, is they're using
partisan propagandists like John Solomon, who is a liar.
I'll just say he's a liar because he lied to me.
He lied to me multiple times over things that were really
important in my life but didn't mean anything to him.
John Solomon is the go to guy in the regime to be able to try to
traffic an idea that DOJ is going to move on to something
bigger. And that's why you don't have to
worry about this Epstein thing. And for whatever it's worth,
John Solomon, when one of two names that was given special
access to Donald Trump's presidential records after he
left office, the two names of people that he was willing to
put his name on and ask the National Archives to
specifically authorize. And we have the document.
It's got John Solomon's name and his phone number.
And I have both of those and his e-mail address, and all of those
are accurate. It's also got Cash Patel's name
and his e-mail address and his phone number, which I also have.
And those are accurate. It is a real document that is
available publicly on the web. If you were to go search for it,
National Archives, Cash Patel, John Solomon were the only two
people authorized to go after Donald Trump's stuff.
And isn't it interesting that Cash Patel is in charge of the
FBI And John Solomon runs this like, full of advertising
garbage propaganda website called Just the News, when in
fact, it's just the spin on the political right.
He's as bad as anybody. And I was taken in by him for a
little while, too. But he's a fast talker and he's
not an honest talker. And the more you listen to him,
you're like, this man's trying to sell me something that I
don't want. He's trying to run me like I'm a
dumb source and I'm not taking that.
So anyway, we've got a little clip of that going on.
He went out on the propaganda tour to try to push something.
Let's start with what Donald Trump says.
Trump is not wrong. The autopen scandal is
absolutely monumental. So we're going to talk about it
for just a little bit. And then, like I said, the dead
new mole, which is the cultural decay.
The autopen is like the capper on years and years of insanity
that has been done. The autopen is we've told you
lies and you've eaten them up so much that we are now going to
put a non sentient human being and we're going to let staffers
run the White House and you're never going to notice Donald
Trump talking about this. He's not wrong that this is
probably one of the biggest scandals maybe in 50, maybe in
100 years. It's about a biggest scandal as
giving the federal government the right to tax us under the
income taxes in the in the 16th amendment and the the fact that
we went direct senator elections in the 17th amendment because of
corruption in 1913. It's probably that kind of
scandal. It's like a it's a nation
toppling type scandal if they actually prove it to be so here
he is talking about it in the Oval Office.
Look, the auto pen I think is maybe one of the biggest
scandals that we've had in 50 to 100 years.
This is a tremendous scandal. And I know the people on the
other side of the OR see their desk, that Resolute desk
unfortunately used it before me. But you know, we have our choice
of seven desks. They're all beautiful.
But I chose the Resolute and so did he, unfortunately.
But the people on the other side of the Resolute desk, I know
them, Lisa, the whole group, and they're no good.
They're sick people. And I guarantee he knew nothing
about what he was signing. I guarantee it.
He guarantees it. Guarantees it.
Yeah. All right, So here you go.
This is Comer talking about this.
He's the the the chief investigator or the one who's
taken on the task in the House to try to get to the bottom of
this thing. It is a big problem,
legitimately problem, because if people who are not the president
were executing the office of the President under Article 2, what
do you do with that? I think it would be a hard pitch
in front of a court of law to try to defend what Joe Biden
just admitted to the New York Times that that he didn't know
exactly who all was getting pardoned or not.
He didn't know who was being pardoned with the use of his
autopen. And that's the whole basis of
this investigation. This is just the pardons.
What about the executive orders? I mean, there, there was no
process that that we have found thus far and we brought in four
people thus far in our interviews and depositions.
No defined process by which Joe Biden was the one saying, yes,
use this autopen to sign my name on this pardon or this executive
order. I mean, Sean, we're just talking
about signing your name one signature.
So, so it, it, it, it doesn't even take into account whether
or not he was mentally able of to understand what he was even
signing. So this is bad.
And I think this puts all of those pardons in peril.
We can do two things at once in this country.
We have 14,000 plus FBI agents. We have thousands of ATF,
thousands of DEA agents. We have people that are
investigators in various other parts of the DOJ.
We can do more than one thing at once.
But this is a big problem. They're not wrong.
I went on Tim Cast yesterday or the Tim Cast Morning show to go
talk about this. And the question was is like,
can you even investigate if somebody has been pardoned under
this auto pen situation? The answer, of course, is yes.
You can investigate anybody. You don't need it.
All you need is the allegation or information that a federal
crime took place. You can open a case.
The Attorney general's rules, which are listed publicly if you
want to go look them up, they're called the dialogue, the
Domestic Investigations Operations Guide, It tells you
how the FBI does business. They can open a case, allegation
or information, criminal activity.
That's enough. You can allege a a perpetrator
or not. You just need to know that there
was a federal crime and that, that whether somebody did it or
not, you can go find out who that person is.
You don't have to name the subject immediately.
You can simply name the ACT. OK, fine.
So there you have it. Conspiracy, conspiracy against
rights. You guys are saying it in the
chat, you know, sedition, treason, whatever you want to
call it doesn't matter. Make the allegation, open the
case, investigate it to the full extent, then you bring it to the
to the Justice Department and the DOJ has a chance there.
We're talking about Trump's DOJ. So theoretically they would be
amenable to it. They can go forward prosecution,
they can go and bring all that information to a grand jury.
They can get an indictment, they can get a true bill indictment.
And then that person is going to have to deal with the judge and
there will be motions and the motions will say, well, this
person was already pardoned. And then you probably won't be
able to deal with this at the at the district level in federal
court. You probably have to take it up
to the appeals level because now you're not talking about the
rules, about the facts. The way that our system is set
up, the, the original charges in the district courts are all
about what are the facts of the case.
And when you get into the appeals court, you can start
arguing points of law. And that's where this would end
up. Is it, in fact, a judicious use?
Is it a appropriate use to say that this thing happened?
And then you would prevent evidence that this was actually
a legal pardon, or maybe it was not a legal pardon.
And so both sides would argue the law.
And then there's a possibility, probably a probability that it
would go out in front of something like the Supreme Court
where they could actually address whether or not a
president of questionable mental facilities who may or may not
have had his faculties at all. And may or may not, according to
the New York Times, have even like ordered any of these things
to be done. And didn't even know who was
getting signed off on by a mechanical arm from the 60s that
signs a signature at some God awful price to the American
people. Because apparently in 2025, you
can buy the most expensive piece of real estate with DocuSign.
You can spend millions of dollars on the touch of a button
by saying, yes, I agree to these terms and I'm going to put my
name, not a wet signature, not a mechanical arm that signs it
with a damn sharpie. But legitimately, you can sign
your entire life away. You can sign your fortune away.
You could do all kinds of medical proxies and so on by
simply going through DocuSign. But the president United States
cannot do the same thing for pardons or anything else.
It doesn't make sense. It doesn't make sense that in
today's day and age where person is having permanent connectivity
to all of the different webs and all of the communications
options are always available. Whether it be the suite of
nuclear tools that we have, whether it be the ability to get
encrypted comms to folks that need to be feeding him, you
know, critical Intel at all times.
The president of the United States has to like call somebody
and have some weirdo back in the White House push a button on a
mechanical arm to sign off on wet documents.
Like it's illogical. It doesn't make sense to any of
us. So that's the question.
Here's Sean. Sean, what's his name?
Sorry. Here's John Solomon hanging out
on Sean Hannity's show. And of course, Hannity's going
to explain the answer that he thinks is right.
But anyway, this is also a continuing piece.
This is a bigger laser red dot that they want you to focus on.
You can focus on more than one red dot.
We're not cats. But what I'm reading in your
piece tells me that starting with Russia, Russia and the
Russia hoax all the way through Jack Smith, we're talking about
every incident of weaponization used against Donald Trump and
how it could be part of a broader grander conspiracy
theory, a conspiracy that actually took place and law
breaking involved in it. And that also the statute of
limitations would not be applicable in this case as a
result. And this would include names
like Comedy and Clapper and Brennan.
Take it from there. Yeah, and Barack Obama, too,
because he was in on these early meetings.
So what the FBI has done is treated the last decade of
weaponization, all the great work that James Comer has turned
up through his oversight committee and put it into a
timetable and said this looks like an ongoing conspiracy.
A wash, rinse, repeat cycle of Democrat gets in legal trouble.
Hillary Clinton in in her e-mail case, Hunter Biden with his
taxes, Joe Biden with his classified documents.
They're let off the hook even when there is extraordinary
evidence suggesting they shouldn't be left off the hook.
And then a parallel track occurs where the the Republican, in
this case, Donald Trump, is investigated falsely for things
like Russia collusion, Ukrainian interference, his own documents
at his home in Mar a Lago. This is a criminal conspiracy.
By treating it as a conspiracy, you eliminate the five year
statutes on individual crimes. They're so desperate to make
this stick and that's why they have John Solomon there.
I don't believe anything he said.
Like I said, John Solomon is a documented liar to me in
multiple instances has said things that I know are not true
that he knew were not true and he knew they were not true at
the time. But he's out there running cover
as best he can because he is a front man propagandist and he is
100% on Team Trump trying to do whatever they need.
Anything to pull away from the Epstein stuff that we talked
about at the beginning. So there's that.
But what if we lost in the beginning already?
What if we've already lost? I think that the the idea that
those people are going to pay for their crimes that you're
going to see a Barack Obama in legal jeopardy.
No way. Comer Clapper, Brennan, I'm
sorry, a comedy rather not Comer.
That's not happening. No way.
And then you get to the real sort of the real nefarious thing
because while we're not paying attention to that, how many?
How many soft hearted people are claiming that something really
bad is happening with the lower level of deportation that is
happening under the Trump administration?
The fighting tooth and nail against this.
And I think Stephen Miller did a good hit on Fox the other day.
That does explain the real game. But I grabbed a couple headlines
from today's things. One of these is ABC, one is CBS.
Millions of undocumented immigrants will no longer be
eligible for bond hearing, says an ICE memo.
So they're very, very upset. The mainstream media is very
upset that we're not going to see the ability to to keep some
of these people in the United States longer.
Immigrants who who arrived in the United States illegally will
no longer be eligible for a bond hearing.
And this move comes as the Trump administration ramps up efforts
to keep immigrants who enter the country legally detained.
They're not. That does not even make sense.
Sentence. The new policy change was
announced in a memo came out last week, came from the acting
director of ICE. Before the apology change,
immigrants could request a bond hearing before an immigration
judge, which meant they could stall and they could delay CBS
reporting. The Trump administration has now
been blocked by a court as they try to deport Afghans from the
United States. Remember we brought in 100,000
of these people, completely unvetted with 0 information.
How do you know? How do you know that?
Well, because I was on those camps.
I'm telling you, I personally experienced walking in there and
there were people that had 0 background information on them
and the CIA was hanging out on the camp.
There was a bunch of wild stuff going on there.
They were people that just walked off into the desert and
they went into America and they have no paperwork.
They're not paroled here. They are now illegally in the
United States, and they came in on military transportation from
the Biden administration. An appeals court temporarily
blocked the Trump administration from revoking deportation
protections and work permits from thousands of people from
Afghanistan. Because when I think about it,
who do I want in my country more than a bunch of people from
Afghanistan? There were some folks from
Afghanistan that seemed like they were going to, they were
going to make a Great American citizen.
I met them. I interviewed them in a sexual
assault case, of course, But I interviewed them and they were
not, you know, going to end up being liable.
Spoke English, had an advanced understanding of things,
understood Western values, understood Western dress,
understood Western technology like toilets.
You'll you'll do fine. You'll get hired on by some tech
company and go to work. That'd be great.
The administration plans to end the temporary protected status
for Afghanistan on Monday. It was this week.
Part of a broader cut. Is that Monday or this next
Monday? I think.
See which day this is. Hold on, was on the front of
their page, 14th. I think it's actually yesterday,
as of yesterday. They're planning to try to end
this part of a broader push to cut back a program that gives
migrants reprieve from deportation from their homes
that are deemed unsafe. Again, we talked about TPS the
other day for folks from Haiti. We've talked about it from
Venezuela and some others. Some of these things have
existed since the 90s. So there's nothing temporary
about TPS. And of course, the courts are
going out to to, to push it as far as they can.
This is the underlying problem. This is the declining action.
This is why I would argue that we may have already lost.
And I think Stephen Miller says it quite succinctly.
So I'm going to let him say this.
He's our spirit animal here in some ways.
I'm not all sour on all Trump stuff and certainly not on all
people in the Trump administration.
There are some people who are clearly better than others.
This man does seem to clearly see the problem.
And even if he's not 100% right all the time, this
identification of the undermining of American Society
seems spot on. And I'm going to play a couple
clips that come from left wing academics and some folks on the
right that I really agree with that support what Stephen Miller
is saying right here as we close.
The left has been trying to shove Marxism, socialism, and
communism down the throats of the American people for
generations now. They ultimately were not able to
do this during the Cold War because the middle class
revolted against communism and Marxism and social engineering.
The left shifted their tactics. The Democratic Party shifted
their tactics to use migration as a weapon to break down the
middle class and to gain political power and control in
this country. They use migration to destroy
our public education system, to destroy our healthcare system,
to destroy wages and working conditions for the middle class
of this country, and in effect to destroy social and community
cohesion. And then in that rubble, in, in,
in that chaos, in that conflict, to then try to articulate the
need forever more government control, ever more government
redistribution, ever more government power, and then to
ultimately import voters, to then support that agenda to
voters who do not believe in limited government, who do not
believe in the US Constitution. And that is why you are seeing
now this violent, yes, violent insurrectionist revolt by the
Democrat Party against Immigration and Customs
Enforcement. You see video after video after
video of Democrat shock troops in the streets, hurling rocks at
ICE officers and Border Patrol in their vehicles, firing
projectiles at them, violently assaulting them, and yes,
opening fire on them. Multiple assassination attempts
against our brave and heroic ICE and Border Patrol agents, and
barely a word of condemnation from the Democrat Party.
In fact, the Democrat rhetoric, calling our ICE officers,
calling our Border Patrol Nazis and Gestapos and fascists,
demanding as they do that ICE leave their communities, this
nullificationist rhetoric, all of which inspires and incites
these domestic terror attacks against law enforcement.
So we really are at a hinge point here for the West, a
fulcrum point. I'm gonna let that just sit for
a second. Can you get enough people in if
you can't do it by policy, If you can't do it through the
education system, can you do it through suicidal empathy?
Can you get enough leftist thinking so that people think it
would be really mean if we didn't just bring in the entire
third world into this country in order to implement our worst
policies? And if you want to see what it
looks like in a terminal late stage experience for some
reason. The guy who was running as the
vice president of the United States, Tim Walz, is overseeing
a state in in Minnesota and the city of Minneapolis now has this
man looking to become the mayor of a major American city.
And here is one of his campaign pitches, because he already
represents A Somali contingent in an American city where we're
seeing exactly what Steve Miller said.
We've brought in people from India that care about India, not
about the United States, not about this new homeland.
They exist in the United States for India and send money back to
India. There are Mexicans in this
country that didn't come here to assimilate, didn't say, man,
this is an amazing culture. I want to become American.
I want to keep my Mexican heritage, but I want to speak
English. There was a time in my young
life when all of the people that moved to this country insisted
that their children did not speak their native tongue.
They learned English and they lost access to Spanish.
They lost lost access to Mandarin, they lost access to
speaking Vietnamese or whatever it was on purpose as a forced
assimilation because they realized that there was value in
becoming American and they wanted that for their children.
That is not the case and the left is insulated that argument.
People come here and they benefit the country they came
from by taking from this country.
And that is not an anti immigrant sentiment.
It is a is a anti anti assimilation sentiment.
If you do not want to assimilate to the dominant culture that
exists in the United States, you are the problem.
This is the worst version of what it looks like and you're
not going to understand any of this unless you happen to be a
Somali person who listens to me enjoy this.
This did not exist even in my childhood.
This is how far we've come in this country with what Stephen
Miller just said. Assalam Alaikum Amar Fatah State
Senator, District 62, South Minneapolis hadiya Jaran Hoff
amarer atahanid OE debato kahaiso bejinta que de gurga
wahanidin O Garcinia barnamer OSOB Ole rahdo rental assistance
program Minnesota legislator wajaiku de dalen enan kugu le
Sano enan USO saara OSOB O cajor tagaya NC sharafda AMA cajor E
manaisa. Are you also wondering what he
said? Me too.
Why was rental assistance the only thing that was done in
English? Doesn't that seem kind of
problematic for people? Shouldn't we be just a little
bit concerned that that guy has probably a real shot at becoming
the boss in a major American city that that is not, that is
not an American sentiment, not even a little bit.
And legitimate communist people who went and trained with
communist Marxist and revolutionaries who did
revolutionary things are now also in charge of other American
major cities like Los Angeles, which is a great melting pot,
which was an incredible place even in my youth.
For all of its problems, it's always been a pretty awesome
place to go. Beautiful weather, diverse
opportunities, all kinds of little microclimates, neat
culture in all these different neighborhoods, which were really
great. Even when I was even in the
early 2000s, that was the case. And more and more you were like,
this is not this is not it. It is completely overrun.
Here's Karen Bass saying that we're going to start paying
people that are in the United States illegally because they
can no longer show up at their jobs where they illegally work
and are being paid by companies illegally because they can't
support themselves. We're going to take money from
our tax base and we are going to support people who broke
American immigration laws because of all the things that
Steve Miller just said suicidal empathy embodied.
And we're going to do it with or without your permission because
we're going to use executive authority under the mayor of
This is why mayoral elections in big cities like this actually do
matter, even in leftist place, because what a crazy instinct
this is. This is a way to distract from
her failure as a mayor. The crime, the homelessness
problem, the lack of rebuild after the fires that were
preventable. You were in Ghana.
Now it's this great idea. Let's give illegal aliens cash
because they're too scared to work illegally.
Watch, we also are going to have a reinstitution of the Angelino
card, something that Mayor Garcetti started during COVID,
that will actually provide cash assistance to people because,
you know, you have people who don't want to leave their homes,
who are not going to work and and they are in need of cash.
We're organizing food deliveries.
I mean, there's all sorts of things that we are having to do
now to protect people from the federal government.
They're not your constituents. They cannot elect you.
They did not elect you. And they have no right to public
funds. It reminds me of the same stamp
that I saw when I was in England for six months.
No recourse. You had no reaction or no a
right to any sort of public funds.
You didn't have the authorization to work.
This is a normal thing. And that was me going there
legally showing up illegally deportation immediately.
You're not going to be able to show up at any place like that.
That's suicidal empathy. OK.
This woman I think hammers at home.
It's going to be more on that exact same point.
This is the day Newmont. What if we've already lost this
thing the the Revolutionary War went on.
We established a win. We thought that we were we were
safe. There has been an ongoing wars
during the Cold War, Marxism, communism, leftism being pushed
on people who wanted to worship government.
And so this lady talks about the difference between the
Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.
One of which is a way that you aspire to holding on to your
rights. It is a warlike attitude and the
other one is how you defend and preserve it.
That is a peacetime attitude. I think it is more than time,
and I think this was actually brought up during the campaign
season last year, that we have to have a Declaration of
Independence type attitude. It's fitting here in July and
not a preserve the Constitution because it's been watered down
too far already. This woman is a leftist as far
as I can tell her. She's a progressive of some kind
and yet she's still pretty spot on.
Listen to this you guys, see what you think.
So there's an old trope in American history that if you
have rights, you rest on the Constitution, and if you want
rights, you rest on the Declaration.
Because that's exactly right. The declaration is nothing other
than an explanation to the nations of the world why the
American rebels were in fact acting properly and why they
weren't people who simply should be hanged as they would have
been if the revolution failed. And that's, that's I, I was
thinking something that that I like to emphasize to my students
because of course, the way it turned out, it turned out well
for them. Had it gone a different
direction? It was they were not lying when
they said if we don't hang together, we shall all hang
separately. Signing their names on that
document was literally signing their own death warrants if it
didn't, if it didn't go the way that they were hoping.
And I certainly have my issues with the founders.
And if you live ever listen to the podcast Joanne Freeman and I
did, there's one in particular that keeps me up at night.
But when I think of the courage it took to write your name on
that and how easy it would have been not to, and I think about
some of the people who represent us today, I feel like we owe the
the founders the recognition that they at least had the
courage of their convictions. Yeah, just saying, some people
represent us today that don't do such a great job.
She is a leftist right. We're in a revolutionary moment
where if you want rights, you appeal to the Declaration.
We had rights. We got those rights.
They were through the Declaration.
They were established and they were enshrined in the
Constitution. And then those were watered down
and they were taken over and they were usurped using the very
process that exists within the Constitution.
And they happened in the 19 teens and 1920s and 30s.
It's been going on a steady March for 125 years.
So we're experiencing that result, which means if you want
rights you have to back, you have to appeal again to the
Declaration of Independence and what it was, what those
grievances were. I would assign you some homework
if you're so interested. It will take you about 10
minutes. You should do it sometime this
week. Go look it up online.
I'll put it over on kyleseraphin.com.
We'll put it in the show notes today.
If you want to just find a click QikLink, read for yourself again
and refresh your mind. If you didn't do it on July 4th,
do it today. Do it tomorrow, read the
Declaration of Independence and tell me that we have not again
reached that point because the war is already on the downside
and we didn't win. So it's time for either a new
war on this, which is exactly what Donald Trump campaigned on.
It's what Vivek Ramaswamy was saying, a revolutionary spirit
of 1776 to regain the things that were lost that that already
shows you that you've lost part of the war.
It's time for a new campaign to get that back.
I'm going to leave you with some thoughts from Nick Frieda's
podcast. This is an outstanding analysis
and once you hear it, you will never unhear it.
When you hear leftist using your favorite things and arguing
against you. Even a Ro Khanna going out there
saying we want the Epstein files.
There is a way to take things that you agree with and use them
against you. She's spot on on this.
It comes from a position of what is your fundamental beliefs and
what are your faith? Where do you actually put it?
What is your good faith nature? I'm going to leave you with this
as our palate cleanse today. Before we do, let's go ahead and
just say this because this might be the last thing we play out
there, and then we'll give you the American Radicals.
If you're watching right now on Rumble, please make sure you've
hit the thumbs up like button. It does boost us in the
algorithm. It lets people know that you
enjoyed what you saw. The engagement with the content
is a big deal. You guys on YouTube are very
good about this, so I appreciate it.
You have a much higher percentage of folks doing
it.youtube.com slash at Kyle Serif, and if you're doing it
there, we do appreciate that you guys are showing up.
It's a great deal for us, and again, it's moving us forward.
Locals, You can find us on Locals.
If you ever have a problem with the stream, Locals is another
way you can find it. It's Kyle seraphin.com.
You'll see the most current episodes and then Spotify if you
want to share it after the fact and replay video and audio both
available. You don't need to pay anything
and you don't need to be a subscriber or anything.
All you got to do is go over there.
You can follow us, you can give us a five star review.
We'd appreciate that, but it's Kyle seraphinshow.com.
It'll take you directly to Spotify.
It's a free download and it's a free link to watch anytime you
want or you can just stream it on the app.
All right, enjoy this final thought.
Here, tell me this doesn't really hit home.
Accurately. One of the reasons why I think
that it seems like we're reading 2 totally different documents.
When a leftist quotes the Constitution or quotes the
Declaration of Independence, they do it much in the same way
that an atheist quotes the Bible to Christians.
That's a good way. Excellent.
Analogy. That's a good way to put it,
Tina. Can I steal that as a tweet?
It's selectively used to hold you accountable, but never
something to hold them accountable because they don't
really believe it. They don't believe it.
One of the reasons. Consider that, consider that,
and that's what we're going to go out on today.
Thanks so much for your pro for for joining us for the program.
Thanks for your attention. Thanks for going out and reading
the declaration and getting your mind right about what this
country was founded on and why. And consider whether or not we
have, we've really ceded some of that ground too far to regain it
through just voting nicely. I think that's kind of where
we're at right now. All right, the American Radicals
podcast is coming up. It's at Amradpod on X and on
Rumble. God bless you.
Look forward to seeing you guys again tomorrow.
Have a fantastic Tuesday. This week has just begun.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Seraphin Show, streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin Bobble Kyle on Twitter,
True Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.