Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, welcome
to the Kyle Serafin show. Today is Tuesday, it is December
the 30th. We are coming up to the end of
2025 and I welcome you to our program.
We're going to be covering a a bunch of topics which we
neglected yesterday. And the reason we neglected him
yesterday is because I think we had a very important breakdown
and discussion of some court filings that went in the January
6th pipe bomber case, the January 5th pipe bomber case, if
you will. That is the story of Brian Cole
Junior and that continues to get more and more interesting, at
least to me. Some of that is because of the
things that you added as an audience.
So I want to take this one second right now, one I want to
thank you for for listening and for sharing your expertise, your
knowledge and your wisdom with me by comments, by the online
chat. I think I can show you guys that
you're out there working everyday as part of this program
like this. This doesn't exist without the
audience. And you're also an integral part
in adding pieces that I don't know about.
There are things that I would never have any awareness of.
I don't raise children with autism, but every time I end up
talking to somebody who has a different experience as a parent
who has a different experience professionally, industries that
I don't work in, I gain a little bit from you.
And one of your comments today inspired some of the stuff that
we're going to cover later on, so I really appreciate you.
This is our live chat. If you've never listened to the
show live, just going to make a pitch for it on YouTube.
They have an opportunity for me to turn on advertisements in the
middle of the program. Same story on Rumble.
They can actually run them in the middle.
We don't do that. I'm not sure if Rumble actually
offers that, but I know that the the YouTube guys actually want
to sell ads in the middle of the live broadcast.
And I don't do that on purpose because I want there to be an
incentive for people to join our live community and be there in
the morning. There.
There are literally thousands of you that listen live between X,
between Rumble, between YouTube. If you guys are one of those
people that are watching right now, give us a little thumbs up.
Give us the like on whatever platform it is, it does boost
the algorithm and allows other people to see it.
And so I appreciate that that's kind of the the deal that we
have. We don't monetize it in the same
way, but that does actually boost us up so other people see
it later on. And if you watch it in the
replay, then you're going to get ads.
And that's how I get paid doing some of the stuff.
So I appreciate you guys doing that.
You guys are insulating US against the alternative, which
is that we have to take money from people that we don't want
to. I don't want to do that.
I'm not really interested in doing that.
I don't think this program would be what it is.
It wouldn't be independent and it wouldn't be on its own
without the ability to kind of stand around 2 feet and me say
whatever the hell it is that I think is important, which means
punching at both sides. We're going to do that today.
We're going to talk about something that's I think is
relevant, not not apparent to everybody.
At the same time. There's an ongoing fraud
situation developing in Minnesota, not that it's new,
but that people are aware of it and they're aware of it.
On the conservative side, this has been going on in multiple
states. It happened in Virginia during
COVID. It's been ongoing for several
years, at least in these specific instances of of COVID
fraud of payroll protection and some other things like that that
were going on. They're all over the place,
folks. Minnesota is a microcosm of it.
It's very prominent. And it also involves kind of
like a racial slash, ethnic slash cultural divide where we
have people from a Somali community that do not fit into
the mainstream American culture. They are not part of our
dominant culture, if you will. And so it gives us an
opportunity to shine a light on that.
But it's happening everywhere. And I think this basically makes
the argument that I continue to make over and over again, the
federal government is the worst solution to every problem,
including when it's the only solution.
It's still a terrible solution. It's just what we have.
So we should be aware that it's not necessarily unique to the
culture, unique to the political party.
Both sides do it. It's everywhere.
It doesn't matter whether it's John Cornyn or Tim Waltz that
are making these things happen. They're interested in their own
money, their own power, their own ability to continue to
project influence. And that means collecting, you
know, fundraising. And so they're going to help
out. There's also that, that suicidal
empathy where people that grew up in the, the boomer era that
have this sort of, I don't know, softness towards other cultures
and don't actually see them as the existential threat that they
exist in. For those of us that are in our
40s, in our 30s and 20s that want to get into a market and
you're seeing yourself edged out by folks that didn't even come
to this country sometimes legally or come here even in the
in the 1st place, they weren't from here.
We don't owe them any kind of allegiance.
And yet here we are taking care of them, bringing them in in a
very compassionate way. And I think that there is a
weaponization happening on the left aisle, left side of the
aisle. What we're doing is we're seeing
people take Christianity and they're using it against people
who are Christian. And maybe they're not, they're
not aware of what has been written or what has been said
about this, but this concept of the order of love, it's being
used. And so I'm going to show you
some examples of that as well. And it doesn't matter whether
it's happening in Boston. I got some examples of maribou
or whether it's happening in Minneapolis with with Mayor Frey
Fry. Is that his name?
The these people are using your innate good your your instinct
towards, you know, faithfully helping out your community and
they're adding people to the community that are not really
part of your community to begin with.
And they are trying to basically subjugate your dominant culture
to a less dominant culture simply because we're willing to
do it. Or is my buddy George friends
George. I just mixed Steve and friend
and and George Hill. When you look at what George
Hill has told me multiple times, he said if America chooses to
act like a doormat, don't be surprised if you get walked all
over. And so that's something we're
going to talk about today. We've also got the ongoing
concern that I have about our federal law enforcement and I
want to talk about that. We're going to discuss foreign
terrorist organizations. The the playbook.
There's another playbook case out of Dallas that Cash Patel
announced. So an ISIS sympathizer, you guys
are going to be shocked to find out, decided to enact his plan.
And he enacted his plan with an undercover FBI agent because
they cannot actually create cases on people that are really
doing things independently. What they like to do is they
like to set people up and they make these cases out of nowhere.
And so we've got another version of that couple other random
stories on there. Zamdami in New York is, is
bringing on lesbian firefighters.
I think that also is the same kind of thing, using a faith to
bring in an ideology. Both of those ideologies, the
weaponization of the Christian faith, weaponization of the
Muslim faith, all these things can be brought into the same
sort of, I don't know what this it they call it a watermelon in
the is the, in the Islamic commentary space, green on the
outside, red on the inside. So Islamic, there should be a
version for Christianity as well.
And in the inside of it, it's it's socialism or Marxism.
And so this sort of vessel to make it acceptable to people.
I think Mondami is not going to give a religious minority
community something he's going to give basically a political
minority. That is the the socialist types,
what they're hoping for. And I also going to tell you,
I'm just going to make a prediction in New York.
It's not going to go the way they think because all these
guys end up being corrupted by the system as much as the system
can be corrupted. Their end up being working for
the system. Same way we've seen folks like
Kash Patel, Harmi Dillon, who I thought as being a pretty
staunch conservative, at least generally speaking, agreeing
with the conservative principles.
And I've got some weird stuff from her too.
She seems to be melting down about whether or not people are
accepting the influence, the appropriate opinions that the
Trump administration puts out. So there's that.
And the overarching thought is, is the reason that I care about
all these things is because if they do not pull off the thing
that needs to be done. If the the Trump administration
at the federal level doesn't do the thing that they claim, which
is de weaponized government, shut down the border and export
people that have been bleeding us dry, then it's going to be
all for naughty. And Steve Bannon seems to
understand that even if he keeps bringing on people who who say
otherwise got a little piece of that from his from his speech at
Turning Point, which essentially is the if we don't, you know,
succeed, then we all hang together and some people are
going to go to prison and people in this administration are going
to go to prison. They're not acting like this is
a fight to the death, even though I believe that it really
is. So there's that.
That's where we're going to go with today's show.
That's a kind of a long warm up, but that's how it's going to be.
And let's talk about our friends over at Asylum.
If you guys are worried about things the way that I am,
whether or not you're going to see big tech or data brokers or
whether you're talking about criminals and government
agencies and so on, trying to have access to your digital
footprint, then maybe you want to do something about it.
Maybe you want to put your phone in a Faraday sleeve the way that
I do. In fact, I am a little bit
behind the schedule right now, so I'm going to put mine in
while we're talking. This shuts down all of the RF
communication, the radio frequency waves coming out of my
cellular device, and that means cellular and Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
and GPS and RFID and near field communications.
There's no tracking, there's no remote access, there's no bread
crumbs. It's the technology that special
operations guys and covert operatives all around the world
use to be able to shut down and secure their comms.
That means that you only pop up on the grid when you choose to.
It's also a really good way to dial back some of this digital
chaos. Yes, it's useful to be aware,
and I like to do that as well. Obviously, we do that as a
program here. It's also nice to unplug and not
have your phone beeping at you with new meetings or reminders
or stock tips or spam or e-mail or anything else like that.
Sometimes you just want to shut it down and be part of your
family so you can protect your freedom.
You can protect your family, you can protect your digital
footprint, but you also can protect your mental health.
And I definitely recommend that slnt.com/K YLE silent.com/kyle
again, it's SLNT that's silent with no vowels.com/kyle.
Save yourself 15%. They sometimes even do higher
discounts. Go into that website and then
use whatever promo code they recommend to you.
If they have tiered buying. They make great products.
I stand behind them. I've got about a dozen them in
this room that I use on a regular basis.
I've been using the covert concealed Carry sling on a
regular basis now too. It's nice to be able to turn off
my phone, jump on a bicycle with my kiddos, and just ride out
into the world and see what's going on without having any
distractions. So you guys can all benefit from
that, I guarantee it. Find a man or a woman in your
life who's looking for a moment to unplug and check out my
friends at Silent. There is a link in today's show
description. All right, without any further
ado, let's dive into today's program starting right now.
So I wasn't sure if I was going to lead with this or I was going
to end with it, but I think I'm going to lead with it.
I want to show you something Steve Bannon said.
This is actually not a turning point.
This was that some sort of an Academy speech.
He's getting an award or he's giving an award.
I don't even know what the context was, but I know what
he's saying is relevant and it's not the way that people are
actually operating. It's part of my grievances and
my gripes with the Trump administration.
I got into a, an X space last night and I was listening to a
podcaster and an attorney and a guy who is ethnically Jewish and
generally speaking conservative. And he was talking about the,
the American nation that we live in is a Christian majority
nation has been and up until 197090 plus percent of people in
this nation identified as a Christian household.
And I think that's relevant. And then over the last, let's
call it 50 years, we've seen that slowly degrade to the point
where people are only in the 60s.
It's like 6062% of American households identify as being
Christian. It's still the majority.
It's still the dominant culture, but we're acting already like it
is not. And so the history of America
has always been sort of, sort of unique in the world.
It's very tolerant and accepting of incoming cultures, and you
can be from somewhere else and you can be about something else
other than what our dominant culture is, and you can still be
accepted and allowed to be here and you'll be protected.
But America lost the thread sometime in my lifetime, so I'm
44. In my lifetime, we've seen a
break in what was traditionally American.
And what that meant was, is that we celebrated, we endorsed and
we operated under a dominant culture and we protected and we
insulated and we allowed the thriving and the flourishing and
the success of the minority cultures.
The non dominant cultures were still allowed to be here.
We didn't persecute them. We didn't run them off and kill
them, at least not in modern history.
We didn't go and destroy them. We didn't genocide them or
export them or exile them or put them in concentration camps in
this country. I mean, again, we're talking
post World War 2 on that's been sort of the modern iteration of
the way that America has functioned.
And I think that was a good thing.
I think it's it's it adds for it's something that nobody else
does. That's the uniquely special
thing that America always offered protection of the
minority, but celebration and rule by the majority.
And we've gotten away from that. And maybe it's because it's been
so successful, maybe because America has been so successful
that now you have this, this entire group of people who
didn't earn that success. You have an entire generation of
people like that, the the oldest levels and most of them tend to
be like the most senior people in our government.
They didn't earn the stability and the safety that we all
operate under. And so they're really quick to
fritter it away. I'm speculating on what I think
is going on here. I, I don't know that to be the
truth. I believe that that may be
accurate based on meeting people and my life experience right now
and what I'm seeing. And so that that thing that we
talk about being suicidal empathy, whether it's GAD, sad,
you hear saying it or other people who've independently come
to this idea that you are going to allow cultures in and allow
them to hold more dominance than they actually hold for
population majorities. It's very telling.
And it's also really galling to those of us that are not living
in those spaces where the people have actually given up that
territory. The Biden administration did
some of this, but they didn't create it.
They didn't, they didn't bring this to America, but they did
recognize that it was a potential to to exploit like a
power center. And you're seeing this in small
ways in places like Minnesota. So the Twin Cities, Minneapolis,
Saint Paul have it. New York is doing it as well.
Boston has been doing it. Some of these areas of San
Francisco probably does the same thing.
You know, parts of California will do exactly that.
They'll celebrate the, the the minority communities and give
them outside influence. And so this is what sometimes
people call majoring in the minors.
You're, you're honing in on the minutiae and you make that part
of the represent, you know, the biggest representation, when in
reality, it's actually not doing the greatest good for people.
And we've seen the churches do the same thing.
They've lost their footing, they've lost their moral
standing. And so when you have people that
are coming out and, and boldly proclaiming, I represent this
faith community, I'm a Catholic, I'm a Protestant, I believe that
we should be doing these compassionate things.
And then you listen to it and you go like, that's just
Marxism. Oh, you, you're a Catholic, but
you also celebrate trans children.
You're a Catholic and you celebrate abortion and you want
to bring people here to be able to, to, to have abortions to
your states. You don't represent the thing
that you're saying. And so you see this
bastardization going on. Anyway, here's Steve Bannon
talking about what the consequences are, and these are
not fictional consequences. This is not like hyperbole or
scare tactic. I think Steve Bannon actually
knows this. Why they're not acting this way,
why he can't get this into the head of the administration, that
they need to act with this haste is beyond me.
And I will tell you right now is God is my witness.
If we lose the midterms and we lose 2028, some in this room are
going to prison, myself included.
They're not going to stop. They're getting more and more
and more radical. And we have to counter that.
And what do we have to counter it with?
We have to counter it with more action, more intense action,
more urgency. We're burning daylight.
If you look across every aspect of this, we have to codify what
President Trump has done by executive order, right?
We we have to codify it and people say, well, they're just
going to be messing about and press Senate.
We got to we got to put aside these structural barriers and
get on with it. President Trump today gave to
the Senate when they came over for breakfast.
Even Lindsey Graham, some of the guys that liked and some of
these institutions. I understand this is a very
tough decision to make and you're going to see some people
in the conservative movement that not in a million years
because I talked to him today. I quite frankly, I had Holly on
the show this morning, Josh Hawley and he's talking about
it. I'm trying to play the
institution well. Well, they called me up this
afternoon. So let's go through the 10
reasons we need to do it. And these are heavy hitters on
what I would call the constitutional limited
government constitutionalist in our movement.
And they're about to come out over the next couple days and
make sorry about that. I think it's funny that you've
got you've got Bannon trying to claim that Josh Hally is a heavy
constitutionalist. This is the same guy that was
saying that we need to open up the government so that we can
move forward with SNAP benefits. Isn't it interesting that all
these Republicans with all the conservative pedigree, they all
vote for funding the agencies that they're claiming are the
problem. They're all happy to put federal
dollars to solve the the issues. They all think the answer to
governmental problems is more or better or different government.
And no one seems to go out there and address the actual root
cause, which is that our our government is too big,
aggressively too big. And I'm pretty confident that
Donald Trump actually campaigned on that.
He said he was going to fund it with tariffs.
The only way that worked, by the way, this is what I heard and
maybe that was wrong with me. Donald Trump said we're going to
get rid of the IRS. We're going to get rid of the
income tax because we are going to fund it with tariffs.
There's two ways that happens. Number one, you raise tariffs as
a protection to domestic industry.
You don't tariff things that you you can't get in the United
States. So you bring in things with free
trade that you require that your your country doesn't create on
its own. And then you protect the native
industry so that you can't be undersold by slave labor or
third World Economic conditions where people can make things
cheaper than they can in America.
And hopefully the trade off is, is that the quality is better in
the United States, so people are willing to pay for it.
And you bring the cost up of that that imported third world
developing nation good to the point where it's like, OK, well,
the trade off is, is a 15 or a 20% increase premium cost for an
American good actually makes sense to me.
I'm willing to pay for the Craftsman tool, the Snap on
tool, the Matco, whatever it is, because I don't need to go to
the Harbor Freight and get the Chineseum stuff.
But if the Chineseum stuff is 110th of the cost, you're never
going to be able to compete with people that are trying to make
it, you know, make ends meet. So the way that you do that is
you have to do one of two things.
You get the tariffs going and then you eliminate enormous
amounts of our government and all these people that are
supposedly on the team of conservatism that seemed to
claim that all the right things. The minute that push comes to
shoves, they're speaking Somali just like Jacob Fry.
They are immediately going to roll over and they're going to
do the most obnoxious thing. They're going to say, well, I
mean, there are people who are really suffering in my state and
therefore we need to get SNAP benefits to them right away.
We need to do more of the socialist programs that we were
actually campaigning against. And none of them will hold on.
Nobody will ever hold them to account.
So Bannon out there saying that it seems to miss the point that
there is a symptom and the symptom is big government and
bloat and and and fraud. And we're going to cover a
little bit of that in a second. But the solution is not like,
well, how do we have less fraud? The solution is how do we fix
the structure that is decayed to the point to allow it.
It doesn't matter if you have more government looking into the
problems of the government. The government does what it
always does. Ask a whistleblower on any
agency. What happens when the government
investigates the government? It finds out that the government
did the thing, right? Technically, that's how it ends
up playing. So you can't fix government with
government. You fix government by getting
rid of parts of government. You, you cut down to the nub.
You reduce it to the point where you have to build things back to
the point where something fails because you actually lost
something that was actually integral.
That's how aggressively you cut it back.
And that never happens with these people.
And I don't see it happening anyway.
What I see is, is them arguing and bickering over who gets to
control the ring of power. Not one person has the balls to
throw it into the fire and they never do.
It's all about who can be in control of the bloat and and
the, and the corruption. That's troubling because the,
the, the answer is that I should see people on the right
answering. They should do the tourniquet,
shut down the border. That was good.
So Donald Trump gets points for that.
And then what was the next move? Right.
I look at this like an emergency medic.
You walk in on scene, you got to stop the chaos.
You got to stop the bleed. You got to make sure that people
don't actively die on your scene.
One of those things is you drop a knee into a place that's
bleeding. You cut off direct pressure.
So that's your tourniquet. That's your shut down the
border. Good job.
OK, Now we've contained the blood in the body or in the the
case of the United States, what we've done is we've stopped
things from going coming into the United States from outside.
So that's helpful, but in the case of the the emergency
medicine, someone who's bleeding out, you need to get them blood
and you probably don't have that in an ambulance, which means you
got to transport to him to hospital, you got to get them
hooked up to some Ivs, you start dripping in blood.
The alternative sort of the of that analogy would be you have
to get rid of the pathogen, the thing that is, that is rotting.
And so that means either aggressively cutting back or
exporting the things that are in this country that don't belong,
that came in through that open wound, that open border.
And what we're not seeing is mass deportation.
We said this before the election.
If they could deport 20% of the people in a year, that'd be
great. But I didn't think it was ever
going to happen. And what we're seeing is, is
that we're, we're looking at like 5%.
There's a minor percentage of people and some people are
claimed to self deport. But if you guys think that self
deportation numbers, which is like 3 or 4X the actual
deportation numbers, if that's going to maintain, that's not
right. That's not how human experience
should should lead you to believe.
What you're going to find out is that all these people who are
self deporting, they are the most motivated, the most
capable, the most financially sound and the most likely to go
back to a good situation. That's why they chose to leave.
They're going to abandon ship with what they've got.
The people that have no other options, they will stay here.
And so next year yourself, deportations will be none or
very, very little. It'll be a massive drop off,
exponential drop off. The only way that changes if you
shut down the way that these people are getting funded, that
they're able to actually mooch off the system and they're not
doing anything to change that. In fact, what's going to end up
happening is the lack of aggressive action that that that
Bannon was talking about is going to result in a loss in
midterms. And I think you guys can
bookmark it right now. November is going to be an awful
moment. And it seems like even the Trump
administration is starting to see that.
Susie Wiles going out and talking about it.
I'll play you a clip in a SEC. And the, and the Democrats are
salivating about taking back over and what are they going to
do? Exactly what you think they're
going to do, they're going to impeach, they're going to
eventually imprison people. And they're saying it openly.
They're not shy about what happens next.
And instead of being bold the way that you'd expected this,
this guy to come in because apparently Donald Trump was
supposed to be a disruptor, It's just not.
It's not materializing. It's a lot more status quo than
people are giving credit for. Anybody who's celebrating it is
losing. And what I continue to see is
this small microcosm that I focus in on federal law
enforcement. They're operating as usual.
If they're operating as usual, so are the other elements.
They're all doing the same thing that they were doing.
You're Swalwell promising you what happens next.
This is why it matters, Congressman.
It sounds like you're saying that inherent contempt, holding
these officials inherent contempt, or even the possible a
vote on impeachment of someone like Pam Bond.
It sounds like, though that may not happen until or if Democrats
actually win the House in 2026. Is that right?
Yes. And, and so we have to Telegraph
that that's what we are willing to do if we are given the
majority let. Me give you a news story about
why I think this is a real problem is the first thing I saw
yesterday. Texas man charged with providing
bomb components and funding to individuals he believed were
involved in a foreign terrorist organization.
Just look at the press release from DOJ.
Individuals he believed were involved in foreign terrorist
organization. This was celebrated as a massive
win. We had the FBI director go out
and cheer on the same group that has been doing the same thing
for as long as I've been doing this podcast and they've been
doing it for basically since the since 9:11.
Set them up and knock them down, Put up your own pins, throw your
own bowling ball and, and roll a strike and then cheer it on even
though you just lined them all up in one straight line.
It's the easiest thing in the world.
Why go out and find danger and, and, and fraud?
Why go out and do the work of dismantling terrorist
organizations, which by the way, might be actually
unconstitutional in some ways? Some of the things that people
are doing that the FBI would love to investigate, they're
constitutionally prohibited from doing because it's free speech.
This is the dangerous reality we live in.
But isn't it fun? We're not finding people coming
in. We're not disrupting people who
came in over the over the border per SE.
We're setting them up with undercover agents.
Today's announcement underscores the FB is commitment to
combating terrorism and demonstrates our continued work
to disrupt and thwart terrorist plots against the American
public. Let us serve as a warning to
those who plan to attack, conduct attacks against the
United States on behalf of terrorist organizations.
You will be brought to justice. So says FBI director Kash Patel.
Well, here's the problem with what Kashyap is saying.
This is the playbook, folks. This is the same playbook.
You, you know it when you hear it if you listen to this podcast
regularly. An alleged ISIS sympathizer has
been federally charged with international terrorist offense
for providing bomb components and money to individuals that he
believed. But we're not actually acting on
behalf of a designated foreign terrorist organization or FTL.
This case is an incredible it's, it's an incredible work of our
federal agents, says Pam Bondi. It's a testament to the
incredible work. ISIS is poisonous ideology.
Well, that may be true, but this guy wasn't ISIS.
He was just a guy. He was in the Northern District
of Texas, and he decided that he found an ISIS friend.
And that ISIS friend, it turns out, is an FBI agent.
Because the ISIS friends don't even exist that way.
They only stop the things that they set up.
It doesn't matter whether you've been listening to me or you've
listened to Trevor Aronson, if you're on the left or the right,
This is an ongoing issue. It happened in Michigan for
people that were paying attention and they were like,
holy crap. They entrapped a bunch of guys
who were like MAGA dudes and they wanted to be the Wolverines
and they wanted to go out there and take back the governorship
and they were going to kidnap the governor.
Except like 40% of the people in the meetings were FBI informants
or undercover agents. How does that work?
We just saw it in Los Angeles. It's the same exact thing.
This is theater. This is the bread and circuses.
This is what they give you to keep the masses saying our team
is winning. This is what I voted for.
Is it you? You voted for this because for
those of you that are starting to wake up to it, and I think a
lot of you actually see this like as a default position now.
And I'll take credit for it because I think I've been saying
it louder than anybody and I say it with some with some degree of
authority. Having seen this over and over
again. Every time these cases get
briefed to the agents, they sound good.
The SWAT team is not to blame because they were briefed on
something that was super dangerous and scary.
You can listen to Steve Friend talk about being briefed up on
the guys that were in Michigan for the Whitmer kidnapping case.
They were near peer operators. Then you go find them and you're
like, they're living in a freaking vacuum store repair
basement and they literally don't have a pot to piss in.
Borrow a phrase from my father. And then they all go back there
and slap each other in the back and they all get more funding
for what they're doing. And it's made-up.
It's it's literally made-up. The FBI worked apart alongside
the local law enforcement partners.
By the way, the local law enforcement loves being called
partners of the FBI. It's like it's it's like a
really gross relationship. I keep finding quickly arrested
an individual who intended to provide bomb making materials to
an FDL. We're protecting the homeland.
Yeah, but are you from who? This is a guy named John Michael
Garza, 21 years old, from Midlothian, TX.
Right. He's a Panhandle guy.
He's 21, and he's an ISIS sympathizer.
Maybe he gave he gave bomb making materials to a person
that he believed was a quote UN quote, ISIS brother, but in
reality that was an undercover agent.
It's every time, guys. The number of actual of actual
foreign terrorist aligned sympathizers that are ready to
conduct attack in the United States is so small that they
either get by and they do it. Think about what happened like a
year ago almost to the day, January 1st we had an attack in
Ware New Orleans. Did anyone catch that guy before
it happened? No no because the FB is busy
doing these cases non-stop. According to the complaint, in
mid-october of this year, an undercover United New York
Police officer noticed a particular social media account,
later determined to be Garza's, that followed several other pro
ISIS accounts online. You're allowed to do that.
It turns out that's what that's what free speech means.
That's what the 1st amendment allows.
And wrote a comment on a pro ISIS post.
And then what happens? They're like, got it?
You have dumb ideas, you're online, we're going to go ahead
and set you up. Not we're going to go find out
where the real bad guys are. No, we're going to go engage a
21 year old guy who's a Mexican American living in Texas who
also thinks that ISIS is a good idea.
Where does that come from? They had continued conversations
because the the New York Undercover reached out to Garza
on social media That New York PD Joint Terrorism Task Force
combination FBINYPD is a serious, serious issue because
their entirety of their their huge budget is contingent on
making these cases up. And they're running a guy out of
Texas because they found him online.
That means that you had an undercover employee paid for
with with federal dollars, most likely under the JTTF, sitting
there and engaging back and forth with dummies who are 21
years old living in the middle of nowhere in Texas.
And Midlothian is not a big place.
It's certainly not a hotbed of ISIS.
So this guy Garza described that he had ISIS ideology and he sent
some cryptocurrency and he believed he was supporting ISIS
causes, including buying firearms and other materials,
which he wasn't buying because he was sending it to an NYPD
Joint Terrorism Task Force task force officer.
Then he sent over propaganda pictures and some videos.
So then we got to take him down. We needed to win.
And what do they need to win? Why do they need to win?
Because they're doing this because our FBI is also involved
in setting up like the actual people who actually did
something really dangerous, but looks like it to be a a
governmental coup that happened in 2020 and 2021 in the J6 pipe
bomber case. They're going to have loss after
loss. And the faster they can move the
new story away from that, they already did their circle jerk
press conference. They already got to celebrate
the win. So God forbid we have to talk
about it again. It's every time with these
people. I'm going to cover a couple of
other stories because I think there's a couple of them.
Like I said, the the situation in in Minnesota, what we saw was
is chasing headlines. We watched our federal law
enforcement not doing the aggressive proactive work,
although they claim that they have no, they're looking for
where is the next media buzz? How do we distract from failure?
And then the ongoing operations of continuing to set up people
and do the things like what we've seen in this
administration is celebration of the status quo.
But rather than do what we saw in the previous administration,
which is that these law enforcement agents did just did
what they did. Now we've got a couple of social
media podcast influencer guys that are screaming out the
everyday work of these agencies in their own way, highlighted
and framed for for positive PR. So people are like, yeah, how
come they didn't do this before? It's like, well, they freaking
did almost every one of these great successes that you find
out, like even right now you're going to hear announcements.
They're they're talking about the announcements of arresting
people in in Minnesota. Well, those cases have been
ongoing since 2022 and nobody wants to go out and high 5 Chris
Ray on the political right and nor should they.
Is it too little, too late? Is there not enough focus?
Are we busy going after J Sixers when in fact you should have
been going after people that were defrauding the American
government? I'm telling you, there were
literally millions of dollars in fraud happening in the DC area
and they were low burner, back burner, barely interested cases.
We would do a little bit of surveillance on them with my
team, but we prioritize the stuff that's fast and
transactional. We'd rather watch gang members
because we can get that arrest on a weekly basis because
there's always more gang members because the border was open, so
they had an unlimited supply. Why would you want to do the
long term difficult thing that only the FBI is actually really
funded to go do these complex white collar fraud
investigations and governmental corruption.
That's the only real reason for that agency at this point.
They don't need to go after quote UN quote, Interstate
crime. They need to go after what's
called public corruption. And do we see that being
celebrated? No, it's a crackdown on social
media and it's this weird discussion about like ongoing
terrorist cases that they create themselves and then they
celebrate and they bend over backwards patting themselves on
the back for it. You guys are listening on on any
of the audio platforms without video.
This is a great time for you to check out our video platforms.
Spotify would be a good way to do it.
Kyle serifandshow.com. You may hear a Spotify ad right
now. Otherwise, if you're watching on
Rumble or YouTube or if you're watching on X, give us a thumbs
up. You can always join us on locals
and support the program. We appreciate that wherever
you're watching, make sure you're subscribed to the
channel. Make sure you guys are notifying
if you want to see us go live and skip some of the ads.
And of course, you can always, you can always give us free
support by literally just clicking the like button.
And I appreciate when you guys are doing that stuff.
Let's continue on with with some of this stuff.
Let's talk about the the Minneapolis scenario viral
video. OK, you guys have probably seen
this video. I'm going to play you one of
them. There was a whole series done by
Nick Shirley. It's a 23 year old YouTube guy.
He's got a lot of balls. I give him credit for it, but he
didn't invent the, the discovery of this fraud scenario.
They've been out there and they've been, people have been
aware of it for quite a while. But he went out and he
documented some of it and he went out and did some basic
answers. Do you?
What I found when I was in the Bureau is that people don't want
to go knock on doors and ask questions because then they
might know we're investigating them.
I can't let them know that we're investigating them.
When you start recruiting a certain type of person and you
start taking people who are not law enforcement and who are not
in military as your background, by the way, the Biden
administration, Chris Ray's FBI did that aggressively.
Only about 1/3 of the people in my class had a background
military law enforcement carried a gun before.
It's not common. They were more happy to go after
attorneys and computer programmers and linguists and
things like this. This is who they hired.
So when you hire people that are used to working behind a desk
and they think they can find fraud, instead of going and
knocking on the door and finding out if the fraud is there.
This is why I had a job that I had in Washington, in Washington
DC. My job was to be the person that
they didn't want to be. And this actually relates a
little bit to the pipe bomber case, because when I said that I
would go knock on a door, it's because I knew the people that
were working those cases didn't want to knock on doors.
And sometimes you got to go bang on the door and find out what
the Hell's going on. This is the story as covered by
CNN. First, a viral video, then a
quote, UN quote surge of federal resources to investigate alleged
childcare fraud in Minnesota. That's a pretty fair headline.
I think as things go, the FBI and DHS say they are, quote UN
quote, surging their resources to investigate fraud in
Minnesota, including at childcare centers.
Because what we're seeing is that there is significant
amounts of fake childcare centers that are receiving a
huge amount of federal dollars. For me, the story is really
straightforward and maybe it is for you as well.
The story says something more about who is paying for it.
Why are there federal dollars and state dollars that are being
allocated to child care centers in the 1st place?
These are things that could open on the free market.
So why does there have to be money coming in from the state?
That's the simple question. Instead, people were like, well,
there's fraud. We got to go after the Somalis.
We got to no, how about we go after the mechanism that allows
it to happen. Is anyone saying maybe we should
be cutting these programs? Forget that there's there's
certain people that are taking advantage of them.
I don't hear anyone talking seriously about the issue.
The issue is, is that there's money that comes out of my
paycheck. It comes out of your paycheck
and it goes into a federal program and then it gets so
anonymized that nobody knows where it's going.
And then it gets sent back down into the states to be handed out
to people that end up being like useful constituents.
I'll play you that interview, but let me just show you why
there's going to be a massive protection of this and why
you're seeing the left actually like they're lionizing the group
of people that are involved in this fraud.
That's because it's a massive voting base and it's obviously a
massive donation base. Here's the mayor of an American
city, one of the whitest people you'll ever find, doing his half
assed version of Speak in Somali, whatever that is.
Magaegewa, Jacob. Fry, Dolckemegalada.
Minneapolis Daman shabka Somaliade Kayemid Mogadishu
garaway hargesa bosaso edabo kismayo wahan raba in an hidin
shego. Sheta Sheta Kalaka.
Taka Baba. What the hell is this guy doing?
First of all, you know, he doesn't speak that language, so
he's just reading some sort of phonetic bullshit off a
teleprompter. And secondly, and maybe more
importantly, why does he think that that is a winning thing?
When that goes out on the Internet, it's there forever.
That is obviously the way that you maintain power and money in
that area. And that is a horribly cynical,
disgustingly cynical sort of calculation that's been made.
And maybe that's why you end up with these learning centers like
this. Is the federal government going
to be the solution to it? No, it's not.
They can go and do an investigation and find out who's
involved. But at the end of the day, how
about we go back and we look at these quote UN quote,
constitutional guys, the same ones that were crying for snap.
There's a reason why they love handing the stuff out.
We used to call it pork when I was a kid.
I used to hear it all the time. Oh, there's all this pork in the
bill. Nobody even says that anymore.
I read all the major news outlets.
I read CBSABCNBCCNNN, New York Times, NPR, Fox News, some of
the other like smaller fringe stuff as well.
Nobody ever calls out pork the way that I used to hear it.
I grew up listening to News Radio where constantly the the
squawk from the right was there's too much pork in each
given bill. One of the crying articles that
I saw today, which I'm not going to cover, but let's just call
what it is, there was a crying article, I think it was on ABC,
but don't quote me on that one. It was on the main page talking
about how the defense authorization bill had been, had
been gutted of fertilization, you know, fertility treatments
for military families, as though that somehow had anything to do
with with the National Defense of this country.
I mean, I, I think we should be having babies too, but I have no
idea why we need to be paying for fertility treatments and why
that's part of the National Defense authorization acts.
Completely bizarre. Just like I don't know what the
federal government's investment is in making sure that childcare
centers are funded with our tax dollars for subsidies.
Here is the here's the YouTube Nick Shirley doing a great job
asking questions with a researcher, talking to a Somali,
you know, daycare center. And some of the stuff.
It's really good viral content because it's well edited.
It's also really easy to go do not that you have to have like
specialized equipment or anything else.
Why are federal agents not knocking on these doors and
finding out who's in there and doing head counts?
And the answer is because the government will never be able to
police these things itself because it allowed them.
And it continues to allow them. They seem to be closed.
No one's opening the doors. You work here.
OS Yeah, let's help them. Where are the kids?
It says it's licensed for 74 children right here state of
Minnesota. Where are the kids?
They got paid $1.26 million in fiscal year 2025.
It says they have a capacity for 74 children.
When, when, where are the kids? Right here, state of Minnesota
website, you work here and you don't know.
I don't know. I was there before.
I don't know what's going on were.
There any kids when you worked here?
He's there, kids there. What's how many?
I don't know. You don't know?
Yeah. You worked here.
OK, well then you're not of any help.
Can I put my son in a daycare here?
No. No, no, I don't know.
Can I speak to someone? No, I don't.
Know No, Yeah. I would like to see if I can put
my son Joey here. Who's his son Joey?
My son Joey, can I check out daycare center?
I'm going to my son. No, I'm the owner.
Do you, do you put your kid here in this daycare?
There is one child in there, Yeah.
I'd like to know if this is a legit business.
Yeah, I'm scared of you too. How come I explain it's a thing?
You're scared of me. Yeah, what's up for you to cut
it? Because of my color?
You said you're scared of me because of my color.
Does that make you a racist? Yeah, no, but you.
You said you're, you said you're scared of me, 'cause of my
color. I'm I'm not saying you.
You, you said you're scared of me 'cause of my color.
That makes you a racist. So right now they're all getting
mad 'cause he's shown the paperwork of this business being
registered as a business. 74 children, no children.
He saw one child when the lady opened up the door.
Wow, wow, wow. So now they're all getting mad.
What was this money spent on? 1.26 million?
What was that money spent? The Dollar.
MAGA. Egawa, Jacob.
Frye, Dolce. Megalada.
Minneapolis, Daman Shabka, Somaliade, Kayamid, Mogadishu I.
Just can't. I just can't not think that's
funny. It's so awkward and weird.
So you've got NBC News covering it.
The FBI is surging resources to to Minnesota.
It's one day after the fraud, but Patel actually says that
they were involved in it beforehand.
I've seen Harmony Dylan go out and make the claim just like,
yeah, there were 99 indictments and and 62 convictions.
It's not enough if there are billions and billions of
dollars. I've seen reports saying as much
as $24 billion in fraud happening in that place.
It's not accidental. It's pretty clearly not
accidental. It's that they've seen, OK, this
is an opportunity for us to to, to do what we need to get done.
We're going to find a group of people that are going to support
us and we're going to support them.
This is a patronage system. There are people claiming this
as well. That's what this this video of,
of, of Jacob Frye kind of insinuates this story here from
NBC News claiming that the FBI went into OverDrive.
It's only because there's PR there to be had.
So we have a government that's literally chasing headlines.
They were doing this work. Don't think they weren't.
There was clearly a white collar fraud unit that was working out
of Minneapolis and they were doing that work.
But nobody celebrating that. What they're doing is they're
giving credit to the new team, even though it's the old teams
work. Because as I continue to make
the argument, in the same way they're doing terrorism cases
the same, they're also doing the same white collar fraud.
It's just whether or not it's, it's got some, you know, some,
some high value in the social media sphere.
Watch this one right here. In 2022, during the Biden
administration, federal prosecutors announced initial
indictments on what they called a $250 million fraud scheme to
defraud federally funded child nutrition programs.
As of last month, prosecutors charged 77 people.
These are always long term investigations.
This is what the what the FBI was designed to do.
It shouldn't be political. It should be.
You're taking money from the American people.
We have an $11 billion agency that goes and investigates
public corruption and fraud and Interstate crimes.
They have a national security mission as well, which I think
is problematic. And So what do they do?
They, they do everything that all normal government agencies
do. They try to find the easiest way
out. One of the one of the great
examples I'll share with you, and there's more to this.
One of the easiest things that you'll see is how do I find the
easiest way to continue doing my job?
Everyone does this, by the way, like everyone wants to find the
shortcut, right? If you can find an easier and a
more efficient way to do your job than you do it.
The difference is are you still achieving the mission.
In private industry you're going to be held accountable for
results in the federal government you're basically held
accountable for numbers. Can you brief a number that
looks good. So here's the biggest secret
that most people don't realize. One of the major, major drug
operation enforcement that the federal government does this is
DEA and this is also FBI. Does this is rather than go
after the cartels that we hear about in Venezuela smuggling in
drugs or the Mexican cartels that are moving things over the
border. It's way easier to set up on
doctors, on people that are really close to you that don't
require a ton of work because they're operating overtly in a
public business. So almost every single what's
called healthcare fraud service or healthcare fraud squad, the
FBI has all these different squads and they're all named for
different things. Very, very unique.
So there'd be a squad that was dealing with Chinese
counterintelligence, There'd be one that would do global
counterintelligence, all the small dogs, there'd be one for
Russia, right? There'd be counterterrorism that
was focused on domestic extremism.
There'd be one that'd be focused on international extremism,
etcetera, etcetera. And then you get into the the
criminal aspects of it. And so you'd have people that we
had an entire squad in Washington Field that literally
just did Asian gangs, specifically with Asian ethnic
people that were, you know, out of ethnic communities,
Vietnamese, Chinese, you know, triad type stuff.
If they were Japanese Yakuza, like the things you see in
movies. Like there was a squad that just
handled that and they weren't super busy, but there were some
squads that did that, Asian boys and some others that were out
there operating. Then you had another one that
was dealing with like Latin American gangs, your Ms.
Thirteens, you know, whatever. And then you'd have other types
of things like healthcare fraud, white collar fraud, public
corruption in this area, Washington DC, public corruption
in Northern Virginia. So that'd be your, you know,
governmental agencies, your city, your county, your state,
etcetera. One of the things they always
had are these healthcare fraud squads and healthcare fraud
should be people that are defrauding the government by
falsely billing Medicare and Medicaid and doing things under
a medical license that allows them to get access to the
billions of dollars, whether it be at the VA or whether it be
through Medicare, Medicaid, etcetera.
Federal programs that I don't think we should even exist
because I have no idea what the federal government is involved
in healthcare. I don't understand it, but we
assume that's true. And so these guys were supposed
to be rooting out that fraud. You know what they did instead?
They went after doctors who are prescribing opiates, what you'd
call pill mills, because it's really easy.
It's less work, it's very transactional.
You get all the statistical accomplishments of regular
arrests, and you don't save any money from the federal
government because pill mills don't really cost the American
taxpayer all that much money. There's no real upside to it.
So you took an organization that was meant to go after fraud.
You'd have a dozen agents aside to healthcare fraud, and instead
they would go after and do drug cases that are super easy.
We'd run down the people that were selling the drugs.
We'd go after murder cases when someone overdosed on the drugs.
Why do the hard thing that actually achieves the mission
when you can still get the same paycheck, you can still achieve
like results, and you can still claim victory.
And this is the same reason why they do counterterrorism cases
against people that are like a Mexican American born guy in
Midlothian, TX who's 21 years old and he's selling nothing.
He's selling absolutely nothing to an undercover agent.
Did anyone get saved by that? If that guy didn't run into the
ever color agent, is he going to accidentally find like an ISIS
dude hanging out online that's going to help him do his thing?
No, the guy was never going to be an operational terrorist.
None of them are. So this governmental answer is
not like, it's never like, oh, well, how do we get the
government more focused on the thing it was meant to do?
How do we, how do we fix this fraud scenario?
You just don't have that program.
That's the right answer, as far as I can tell.
It shouldn't actually be that hard.
And all you're doing is you're setting up, you know, the, when
you look at the the way that the other side does it, what they do
is they immediately run into claiming that you're morally
bad, that you're not doing something nice.
And so they're weaponizing that, that segment of the population
that's willing to look at you and say you are not holding up
the virtue that you don't even believe in.
And what we're going to try to make you act like you do.
You're a Christian, aren't you? Aren't you a compassionate
person? Don't you care about other
people's outcomes? This woman is running for Senate
in in Minnesota. Watch her immediately dawn the
cloak of Christianity of of Catholicism.
And then I can show you that there's nothing Catholic about
this lady, but she's going to make you feel bad about it
because she's going to say, listen, as a as a Catholic who
goes to Mass every Sunday, I believe these things.
It just turns out that none of the things she says are actually
in communion with the Catholic Church's teachings.
And that's something. All we got to do is look one
layer deeper. Oh, there's a bunch of fraud
here. How do we stop the fraud?
Well, the easiest way is to stop the agency that puts it out.
Well, we never want to do that. We just want to correct the
problem so we can continue giving that money out.
We just want to give it to the right people.
This woman is going to go and make the emotional argument,
which is what I see the left do on a regular basis.
No, I, I'm Catholic. I go to church every Sunday, and
I am very clear that my face tells me to welcome the stranger
and that I often wear a medallion of Mother Cabrini,
who's the patron St. of immigrants.
Oh, my God, I'm not carrying my rosary on me.
Is this going to turn into a very Catholic episode of the
show again? No, no.
But it is just so clear what we are called to do.
And you know, when we are watching these images of that
mom who was in front of the school, who was just pulled from
her vehicle, right? As we hear children crying, as
we saw a 15 year old in the suburbs of Chicago who was
detained. Like it is as we watch these
folks in a whole communities just be terrorized.
We have to speak out. This is it's just wrong.
And we can disagree about policy, but when you completely
strip the humanity and any kind of due process from people,
that's just called kidnapping. I mean, that sounds very
compelling right up until I look at the point that the underlying
point of your argument, the entire hinge of what you started
off with, your appeal to authority, was that you're a
Catholic. This is the Lieutenant governor
of Minnesota who tells people if you're seeking an abortion, come
on in. You are welcome here.
We want to enable your abortions as Iowa prepares to enact one of
the strictest laws in the nation.
This happened a year and a half ago, July of 2024.
She went out and said, why don't you come here and have your
abortions. There is nothing that is in
communion with the Catholic Church about abortion.
When I see people have things like pro pro-choice Catholic on
the back of their car or even, you know, Catholic Democrat,
which I see sometimes at mass, these people don't get to make
that argument because they're, they're completely out of
communion with what the church actually teaches on these
things. And they're they're using it in
a weaponized fashion. She's talking about due process.
What due process did you engage in when you came into this
country illegally? Did you care about due process?
Why should we give you due process when you actually are
getting due process? They just don't even know what
it means. Amusingly enough, there's a
administrative process that happens when you come into this
country illegally and we remove you.
It doesn't mean you go in front of a court of law and then a
jury of your peers because you don't have any peers because
you're not from here. There's an administrative judge
that looks at it and goes like, Yep, yeah, you meet all the
criteria, out you go. That's how it works.
But this lady's going to tell you that she's Catholic here.
You can see it if you guys are listening.
You're missing out on a picture of Peggy Flanagan wearing a
Protect trans kids with a freaking with a freaking knife
on it. Was that a buoy knife?
What they failed to look at, and this is something that I think
the American, the American dominant culture needs to re
establish, is something that Saint Augustine called Ordo
amorous. This is the order of love and
the way that things are supposed to stack up.
God first, then family, then neighbors and friends, then your
city and your nation, and then the world.
Last. It means that there is a
priority system because we're human beings and we can only
focus on so much. So if you are a real Christian
and you want to look back at the history of what Christianity has
taught about love for all people and welcoming the neighbor, you
don't welcome the neighbor and sacrifice and kill off your
friend. You make sure that your family
is taking care of first, that those that are in your community
and the ones that are immediately in your vicinity
first. You don't immediately start
throwing all the things you have off into the world.
It's like throwing a cup of water into the ocean.
It does nothing. Or taking even better a bucket
of water and tossing into the desert.
It immediately evaporates and there's no impact.
But that bucket of water may be enough to water plants in your
neighborhood or give somebody a drink who's dying of thirst.
That is a friend or a family member.
It's pretty interesting when you hear people make these appeals
and everything that they are appealing is immediately
contradicted by their own words and their own actions.
It can't be done. And again, she's a Catholic.
Maybe she needs to go read some Catholic teachings.
This is this is so easy to see for me sitting on the outside of
it because I don't have to be on anybody's team.
You're going to make emotional appeals.
And that probably sits really well with a nice, generally
speaking, compassionate 50 to 75 year old white lady who's
sitting there going, yeah, we should be kind to strangers and
neighbors. All my needs are met.
I live in this house and I'm comfortable.
And how, how dare I sit here and not, not help out these poor
people. Meanwhile, those people did
nothing to help veterans who came back with PTSD and are
living on the streets in their own nation.
And So what do we do? We open up and we bring in
100,000 Somalis or 100,000 Afghans, some of whom want to
kill us, some of whom clearly have none of the same feelings
or, or beliefs that we have and actually think you shouldn't be
allowed to have them. And they're doing everything
they can to work against it. That's suicidal empathy.
So it should be pretty straightforward.
It's easy. It's like, OK, fine, let's
eliminate the, the governmental programs that support this stuff
and let's just see what the, what the human beings will shake
out. We talked about it a couple
weeks ago. This is probably at the
beginning of December, James Madison essentially stating one
of the guys who helped frame the Constitution that charity cannot
be mandated by the government. That's where we see the
subversion happening in this nation.
The structural problems, which Bannon kind of alluded to,
they're never being addressed. They always go after symptom
every single time. How do we stop the symptom?
Don't worry about the root cause.
Don't worry about the fact that we've democratized a, a part of
our legislature. So that should have never been
democratized. Another one of you made the
comment about the 17th amendment to me the other day.
I'm telling you, you can track the stuff back well over 100
years. There is nobody alive today that
is to blame for the failure and structure of this government.
So don't think I'm putting it on any group of people or any
administration. It it's, it's not fair because
it, it predates us by 120 years standing here today.
And yet how many people are looking at root causes and
saying, how do I fix what is wrong?
How many people are looking at it the same way that like a
clinician would look at the problem and say, OK, here's the
symptom that's going to kill us. We have to stop that.
And then we have to go and treat the root cause.
We have to either cut out the cancer.
We need to add blood. We need to put a, a, some sort
of a, a, a, a pharmaceutical that's going to kill off the
pathogenic Organism that is expanding through our
bloodstream and ending our life. How do we do that?
How do we stop the infection? We don't ever do that.
Not ever. We just go like, how do we make
this headache go away? How can we make ourselves feel
OK about it? It's pretty simple.
All right, here's here's the governor of Minnesota who's now
facing all these fraud allegations.
And his first thought is also the same as Peggy, but he's less
sophisticated about it. He just said that you're a
racist. This is a you should be worried
about your own problems. This reminds me very clearly of
a don't worry about the, you know, the, the, the speck in
your neighbor's eye, like go for the plank in your own.
It's good. It's good.
Except what if the neighbor doesn't have a plank in their
eye? What if they have like a beam
that is crushing them to death because the government is taking
all your money and giving it to people that have no business
being here. And by the way, they don't
actually feel that way because they're not Christian.
Look, it's not law abiding citizens, if they, if that were
the case, there's a lot of white men should be holding a lot of
white men accountable for the for the crimes that they have
committed. I think for the community to
maybe educate their population, because I think what you're
seeing here is their secondary victims in this, that there's
there's providers inside the community that are then
victimizing the community himself by signing them up.
Because when we're going to some of these people, they're like, I
had no idea I was in this program.
So I think it's, it's asking us then, you know, for every crime,
which of course the majority being committed by white men,
asking us to do more about that. I think it's crime in general.
And I think the biggest thing on this is it's just making sure
that we're educating the population.
And again, this is 80 people or so that have been convicted in
this, maybe some more in that out of a broader ring, Medicaid
fraud will stretch across all racial demographics, all all
ethnic groups. So I think it's really important
for us to note each each community's got this in their
own midst. But to blame them and say that
they should have been responsible for stopping it, I
think that's a pretty hard reach.
I think we continue to educate folks about why.
Nope. That's you making an apology for
people that don't require the apology, that don't deserve the
apology. What are you doing?
That's like, yeah, we've identified fraud.
We're going to root it out. It seems very particular to this
community, this particular style of fraud.
So we're going to go out there and focus on this community with
this type of fraud. And also we'd like to go after
some Medicare and Medicaid fraud.
And it doesn't matter who owns them.
It's like, OK, there's healthcare companies.
I used to work for a healthcare company that would bill $1000
for, for an ambulance ride when an ambulance wasn't required.
They would bill more if I sat in the back versus if the, the
other guy sat in the back. We both were just sitting in the
back riding along with you and like maybe we did a blood
pressure check, maybe we'd run like a quick EKG on you.
If you had a cardiac condition, they'd bill 1000 or 1500 bucks
for a few minutes down the road for ambulance transportation.
I couldn't do anything about that.
And the more I saw it, I was like this, this is awful.
I don't want to be part of that. I want to go to the clinical
side. I want to go actually be in the
hospital because what we're doing here in this private
ambulance service is just taking federal dollars because we can,
because it's enabled, because it's allowed.
And I imagine that they probably have a pretty strong lobby that
allows that to continue. So, yeah, there's fraud going
back all over the place. And.
And what about the agencies that should be handling it?
They're not handling it. So if we can't police ourselves
inside government, if our government cannot handle
policing, you know, governmental fraud, then the answer is don't
have that part of the government.
That's never what you have. You just hear this blame game.
This is Nick Shirley going on Fox talking about this exact
same thing. And this is an even broader
question about whether or not it's about white supremacy,
which is where it always ends up.
If you take these things down to their logical roots, which is an
emotional appeal, you're a bad person because you don't want to
do this thing. Never address the actual thing,
because that would be difficult. You have to admit that these
people are doing things that are wrong.
Doesn't mean they're the only people, it just means that they
are. So they always deflect this.
And again, this is subservience to a non dominant culture.
It must have enough dominance. It's presented itself strong
enough that these people actually want to go and service
them. This is what happens when they
target communities for their own benefit.
This is what happens when they scapegoat.
And this is what, say, happens when they no longer hide the
idea of white supremacy. So it sounds to me, Nick, that
Governor Tim Walz is saying that you and others that are out
there trying to expose this, you know, you're doing it because
you're white supremacist. What is your response to him?
Yeah, Tim wants votes. There are entire apartment
complex that where white people have been pushed out of these
apartment complexes because Somalians have taken over and
they're inside of these towns like Minneapolis where they can
go and go get votes from these people.
And if you have 100,000 people that will vote for you because
you're going to enable and let this stuff happen and because
you're going to call white person racist for calling out
facts. This is what's going to happen
to a state like Minnesota. Minnesotans, they seem Minnesota
nice, but they are very upset. And I totally understand why
they're upset because they don't have a governor who's actually
working for them. They're he's actually working
against them. It it, it's not the only place
that this is happening. This is clearly happening in
other places that are dominated by the political left.
They've gone out there and they've taken a a small minority
group, given them outsize power and influence, given them
basically like moral authority and said This is why we have to
support them because previously something else bad happened.
Again, it's all people that didn't actually earn the sort of
comfort and and freedom that they live under.
They want to seed it, but it all of this stuff goes back to an
age-old cycle. This is a cycle as old as time.
It doesn't matter whether you read judges in the Bible or
whether you go and just look at human history over the last like
200 years, things get good, society is stabilized.
It takes strength, it takes effort, and then what do they
do? It creates people that are soft,
that have known nothing else, that have not had to deal with
hardship, didn't had to actually craft it out.
They don't know what the consequences of their failure
is. And so they go out there and
they seed it and fritter it away.
Doesn't matter if it's second generation wealth or third
generation rich kids who go out there and you know, they have
all kinds of substance abuse problems.
They throw all their money into a casino or something.
I mean, it happens all the time. And then what happens next?
Then you have people that are destitute, or you have a nation
that's destitute and it's fallen away from its principles.
You got to go and you got to go and build it up the hard way
again, manually. If you want to see what what,
what the answer, or what would a personification of good times
create soft men? It looks just like this in New
York City right now. This is Zoran Mandami.
It's going to be the mayor. He's walking through the
streets. He has no real work experience.
He's 34 years old. And again, this, this whole
concept, this democratic, this democratization of America, that
was never meant to be like that in this country.
We were meant to have sort of a hierarchical structure.
We were meant to have like an oligarchy, which is really what
it is, or an aristocracy that meted out and, and, and balanced
out the masses. You guys, look at the founding
fathers. They were kind of elitist in a
good way. They were like the people matter
and the people should be served. But also we should probably put
a check on the on the instincts and the appetites of the mob
because the mob is very fickle and it turns and makes bad
decisions. Like putting a socialist 34 year
old guy that's never run anything in charge of America's
biggest city. What a wild thing to do.
We'll see what it looks like. You can tell it's not going to
work out well. The people that have money are
going to leave. The people that have influence
are not going to experience anything.
And I'm going to bet you more likely than not he ends up more
corrupted by the system than he can do to dismantle what he
thinks he's going to dismantle. I don't think he'll be
successful in the thing he even says.
And he's already placating people, right?
He's already going out and making bizarre decisions like
putting people into positions that you cannot fathom them
being in. And like, why would you want to
put, what would make you think that putting a, the EMT lesbian
in charge of the fire department would have a good outcome?
Well, it wouldn't matter. But all you're going to do is
you're going to cater to a very, very small minority of people
that you've said are important. And so that's what you do.
You go out there and you just give them what they think they
want. The sad thing is, is that the
New York Fire Department does a lot of good work.
Can't imagine them doing anything useful.
And you can't imagine someone who's never been a firefighter
being in charge of a fight like an agency like that and being an
EMT and being a being someone in charge of the emergency medical
system. It's not the same.
I don't know, putting a fat lesbian in charge of the New
York Fire Department is actually a pretty good slap in the face.
See how many people want to stick around and do that because
they can find work elsewhere and you can get paid just as well to
do the same work and actually be appreciated.
Lillian Bond Signor is a career first responder.
In just nine days, she'll be running the world's busiest fire
department. One of the most important
appointments of the incoming administration.
And they deserve a leader who cares about their work because
she did it herself, who understands every detail and
will fight tirelessly to empower FDNY and make it the best
firefighting force in the world. Lillian Bonsignore began her
career as an EMT in 1991 and was ultimately promoted to chief of
the city's EMS division, where she served for three years
before retiring in 20. Lillian Bond Signore is a career
first response. Sorry about that.
I had that bumped up to like, 115%.
So the speed made it sound even more ridiculous.
The helium voice was perfect for that, wasn't it?
That's about how serious that looks.
It's terrible. It's a terrible decision.
They've done this, by the way, in Los Angeles.
You guys are calling it out in the chat, and rightly so.
If you make decisions based on people, the DEI decisions that
didn't earn it, Yeah, the results are predictable.
You put people that are not competent there.
The answer should be OK, are we doing the job?
Are we fulfilling the mission? If the answer is are we just
checking the box and putting people that look good, sound
good, or, you know, sort of placate some group of human
beings? You forgot what the mission is.
The mission is not to promote lesbians into positions of
power. The mission is to make sure that
buildings don't burn and that you have an effective
firefighting force and an emergency medical team that can
go out and deliver that life saving capability.
Who cares what the person looks like?
And there's no chance that that person is the most competent.
There's none. I'm just going to tell you right
now, the number of paramedics that you meet that are women,
it's very fractional. It's small.
The number of firefighters that you meet that are women, it's
very small. It's the same as is is in a law
enforcement, in the military. The odds that the best and most
capable person for that job is a chubby middle-aged lesbian is
none. It's none and everybody knows
it. Look was not a single person was
like, yeah, if I had to bet the best person, if I was going to
draw them out, I'd sketch out this person, a lady wearing a
men's suit with a pot belly. And why does it matter that it's
a fat lesbian? Why does that matter?
It really does. It actually matters because EMS
work. It's physical.
It's demanding. Oh, how do you know?
I was a paramedic for 10 years. It's lifts, it's CPR, it's
getting into awkward spaces and pulling heavy people that have
had like really, really dramatically bad things happen
to them. It's dragging a £300 cardiac
patient out from behind the toilet where they fell down and
had cardiac collapse and you bring them out into the living
room so you can actually do something.
It's you and your buddy grabbing someone by the belt and the foot
and pulling them out of a tile room and putting them somewhere
where you can actually access their patient, you know their
problems and see where they have veins and you're working in bad
lighting. If you're working in the back of
an ambulance, it's bouncing you around.
So you have to hold on and have like good core and then you may
have to do something really aggressive.
You know, you may have to pull somebody in in a a dangerous
scenario where they may die. Firefighters lifting heavy
bodies out and stuff like that in really unnatural and
uncomfortable positions. So being a it's like seeing a
chubby nurse and I see them all the time too.
And there's a lot of nurses out there that are very unhealthy.
They're living a non healthy life while they're out there
administering to people that live non healthy lives.
And they don't see the irony in it.
The saying there's a, there's a physicality to certain jobs.
And if you want to go lead people in a physical job,
there's a reason why Pete Hagseth actually has the respect
from people who are the actual troops and why that actually
matters. And there's a reason why guys
like Kash Patel don't because they're pretending if you go out
there and you are the thing that you that you claim to be and you
were that thing and people can look at you and go like, got it.
You know what I'm doing. You understand the thing?
You're even still meeting the mission requirements of my
mission, even though it's not required of yours.
I can follow that leader. That person leads from the
front, as we say. Then you see the alternative.
The alternative is putting some middle-aged lady who's never
done that job in charge of one of the more important things.
Like there's a ton of money, there's a ton of budgeting, and
more importantly, there's a ton of like required Esprit de corps
because firefighters, they don't get paid nearly as much as they
could and their job is kind of boring and kind of stupid right
up until it's your family and it's the worst day of someone's
life and they get called to be there.
That's the funniest part about it's the same thing you find in
law enforcement. Mundane, non interesting, just
hanging around and then suddenly it's like go for all the chips
and somebody's family member may or may not come home based on
your ability to be prepared at a moment's notice in the middle of
the night while you're sleeping, Bing tones go off and you're out
there running. People like that are going to
look at that woman and think that they got it right.
I don't think so. It's amazing though, because
you're seeing this cover by the for the mainstream news.
This is ANBC story on it talking about the the most important
thing is for Muslims in New York.
His victory bridges a long standing division.
I saw like four articles on Mandami.
That's why I'm covering him today.
His inauguration represents a bridge for Muslims.
What does that have to do with being the mayor of a large city?
You're essentially the CEO of a massive, massive organization
with 12 + 1,000,000 people in your general area that do
commerce there and live in your and, and, and what does it, What
does it matter if a Muslim person feels good because
another Muslim person who doesn't even seem to be that
Muslim? That's the funniest part about
it. Again, we talk about the, the
concept of the watermelon green on the outside Muslim and and
red on the inside socialism. I don't, I don't know that this
guy is, is particularly devout. I think he's playing the game
the same way that Jacob Fry is. Zora Mandali's election to the
New York City next mayor has become something larger than
historic. First, for many Muslims in New
York, it's a rare moment of visibility and unity across the
city's Muslim communities. That's what we need, a
fractionalized number of human beings.
Less than 2% of the US population are Muslim.
Statistically irrelevant for whatever it's worth.
And yet non-stop articles written by Myrna Al Sharif,
whoever that is giving outside influence to things that don't
make any sense to me. It's wild because they're
talking about how it has the potential.
It's a meaningful blend for Shia Muslims who often felt sidelined
within their own faith. Talking about the the wife of
Mandami coming out and telling people that she's Shia and
there's a Sunni majority stuff that doesn't matter to
Americans. We don't care what sect of Islam
you're part of. That's not what we're about.
It's so fringe, It's so small. I had a discussion with somebody
last night. They were telling me about Jack
Mormons. If that's, if I'm even saying it
correctly, Mormons who are basically Mormons in name only
and don't actually adhere to the tenants of, of, of the Mormon
faith. I was like, who cares?
Who cares? Seriously, Who cares about this
stuff you're getting in here? You're getting into the such
minor minutiae of it that you want me to care about it.
I don't understand. Like, I don't understand why you
think it matters. How about the big deal issues in
America, which is do whatever the hell you want for your
faith. Practice it however you choose.
Don't try to project it on to the, to the dominant culture of
America. This is why I keep telling
people that that my, my movement is, is, is going to be really
simple. This is what 2026 is going to be
about for me. Bacon cheeseburger nationalism.
I don't mean it in a mean way, but seriously, if you will not
eat a bacon cheeseburger with all the things that come along
with it, then you're not my tribe.
And by the way, you're not the dominant tribe in America.
And if you think otherwise, you are sorely mistaken.
I can go out on the street in any major city to America.
Go walk up to people, any male over the age of 18, and find out
whether you're on my team or not.
Very simply, if you can eat bread and you don't ask me
whether or not there's going to be a nut allergy involved in it.
If you can eat cheese and not cry to me about your dairy
problems. If you can eat beef without
saying something about how that offends your sensibilities,
whether you're vegan, vegetarian, Hindu, or whatever,
and if you can eat bacon, which is delicious, then you're part
of the dominant culture in America.
Period. It's not.
It's not even negotiable. It's such an easy thing that all
of you know that's true as you listen to it.
And if there are people that have problems with these things,
you can exist. I'm not saying that you're not
in America. I'm saying you're not the
dominant culture. So stop trying to put your other
garbage on us. That's really simple.
America is meant to be ruled and governed for the majority with
the protection and the insulation for the minority to
continue to be able to thrive. Bacon cheeseburger nationalism.
I'll show you the opposite of it.
Are you ready? This is what the RNC is.
This is why I will not be and you will never find me at an
RNC. And this is Nick Fuentes making
commentary on it. This was the only one that I
found. One of you guys made this
comment to me yesterday on social media.
So I'm sharing it with you because I think it's both
amusing and I don't think he's out of line.
I feel the same way. This is Harmey Dillon,
conservative influencer who's been married three times.
Her recent husband passed away, so she's a widow now, but three
marriages just like Donald Trump.
That's not a particularly conservative position for
Americans. She has some really good ideas.
And then she went to the RNC and she did this, which I never
actually sat through and listened to.
This is crazy to me that you would take the most non dominant
thing and bring it in to the dominant culture of America,
which supposedly represents people who listen to the show
and people who are generally speaking, conservative without
being, you know, Republicans. There is no party that
represents us. There is no bacon cheeseburger
nationalist party. And that would not be an
offensive party. In fact, it would do well for
all the people, the Somalis. It would do well for the people
who are Hindu. It would do well for everybody
because nobody's out there like shoving it down your throat.
We're just saying like this is what our national food looks
like. Go anywhere in America.
Go anywhere in the world and ask them what it is.
They will tell you it's American.
They know anybody who's traveled knows this.
Alternatively, you could put this in and bring the quote UN
quote big tent. And then you're going to wonder
why you don't get the, the, the, the reactions and the successes
that you'd expect. It goes on, it goes on and I
can't do much more of it because 1, I don't like a tunnel singing
and two, this is how you give guys like Nick Fuentes room to
operate. This is why Nick Fuentes has the
following that he has. I had someone say like, I'm not
following you down. You're Nick Fuentes, you know,
phase. It's like, I don't really care
if you can't acknowledge what this is.
That's the voice of every regular bacon cheeseburger
eating person in America going, what the shit are you doing?
Why are you putting that in front of us?
What does this have to do with our political structure?
Like I don't even need you to go out and say a prayer at all.
You can have a completely secular version of your of your
governmental policies. They just have to be governed by
basically Christian values because that's who the majority
of America is. Period.
The end non non negotiable. You want to make people get
pissed? You want to make people decide
that they will just abandoned your party and have the thing
that we talked about Steve Bannon worried about.
You want to get slaughtered in midterms, go promote that
nonsense. Go promote Vivek Ramaswamy
saying things that occasionally sound really good.
And he was talking about, I mean, I that guy was such a
cartoon, wasn't he? When he was running on the round
wearing like the American flag jacket, putting on the cowboy
hats. Like, dude, stop, Just be you.
Stop being fake. He's a really smart guy.
Vivek Ramaswamy is a very smart man.
He's also very savvy. I'm also a little bit suspicious
of him at this point because he says things that don't make any
sense to me. Got a great little clip of him,
of his words being read by people who are sort of
incredulous in the way that he actually comported himself.
I'm going to find it real quick for you because when you hear
it, you're like, oh, this seems problematic.
If you want to open up the quote UN quote tent.
This is the reason why big tent politics, politics suck.
What you've done is you've brought all the people in that
don't hold your principles and then you act shocked that there
is in fact no principle that that governs your, your, your
administration. This is I think the reason why
MAGA people, some of them ones that are paying attention to
outcomes and really want to see things like they don't care
about the person, they care about the actions.
The people that want to see reduction, not of like fraud,
but of the program that allowed fraud to exist, the underlying
conditions, those people are going to be pissed.
They'll always be pissed because they got sold a bill of goods
they thought they were getting. Everybody joined our tent
because they thought we had the best chance of doing good
things. What they didn't realize is we
brought in all these people into the quote UN quote big tent and
all they did is dilute the values that we actually thought
we had. So there was in fact no
principle and they just put the name on it.
America First. Not actually like America is
First, but America First trademark, whatever that brand
means. Do you know the brand that says
the CIA is now going to do drone strikes in ports in Venezuela?
Is that really the biggest threat to America right now?
Is that really who we need to go pick in a fight with?
I understand the idea that you want to influence your
hemisphere Monroe Doctrine, but it's the opposite of taking care
of America First to go pick a fight with Venezuela.
At this point, I'm pretty confident.
I saw Donald Trump say that we were going to campaign on the
idea of no new wars. In fact, we are going to shut
down all the foreign conflicts, kind of the opposite if you're
going to turn around and start doing CIA drone strikes at ports
in Venezuela. As reported by the New York
Times, the attack last week on a dock purportedly used for
shipping narcotics did not kill anyone.
To people briefed on the operation, it was the first
known operation inside of Venezuela by U.S. forces.
This is an act of war, whether you like it or not.
When you go out there and you do a kinetic strike, sending
explosives from the sky into somebody's infrastructure,
you're attacking their nation. If somebody did that to Los
Angeles, we would also be furious.
And you should expect the same from them.
Now, is Venezuela like, capable of doing as much as the United
States? No.
Can they project power and force the way that we do?
No, they cannot. Do I really, really care
desperately about whether or not there's a dock or a port that's
still functional in Venezuela? As a human being who cares about
cheeseburgers and making sure my kids get educated?
No, I don't. I actually don't.
I, I, I personally do not care all that much, except I know
that it's not the values that we're being were being sold.
It's not the values that we were, we were told was coming
our way. It's pretty interesting too,
because we did an interview and it's been brought back up to my
attention again with a guy named Jordan Goudreau.
A lot of the things that I've, that I've done on this podcast,
they stay in my head and I kind of like I have them in my head,
but I don't actively think about them all the time.
And you guys will remember them because they were they, you
received them differently than I did.
You know, I was part of it and you were observing it.
And it actually helps to be further away.
And if you remember what Jordan Goudreau came on, he was a Green
Beret. And he talked about how the
Trump administration one point O had actually asked him to go out
there and create a, a coup of of sorts in Venezuela.
That was something he was trying to do.
It was a priority of the first administration, per him.
The DOJ went after him aggressively under Biden and
still the ongoing DOJ, which is the same DOJ, they went after
him. He's now a fugitive from
justice. Jordan Kudrow, former former
guest of this program. Here's an open international
warrant from our Justice Department that's kind of
interesting. And when I briefed my buddy
George Hill about it, who spent a lot of time in the
intelligence community, and I was like, what do you think
about that guy's story? He said it's highly plausible.
But the odds are is that his OP wasn't the only OP that was
going on. And that's the way that these
agencies operate. And that's what people are
starting to become aware of. The operations are circles
spinning against alternative circles spinning against
alternative circles. It's a clockwise with a
counterclockwise on the inside with another clockwise with
another counterclockwise. And so each one of those
individual circles has to have an achievable goal.
His achievable goal was landing like munitions and getting a
guerrilla force to actually operate in Venezuela, which is
an achievable mission. And even his own operation had
two different circles spinning in it.
One was the actual objective and the other was actually landing
like a a boarding force that was a distractionary force, both of
whom had achievable tactical goals.
This is how these things work. And so when you start looking at
it and you go, oh, shit. And now we're dropping drone
strikes over there. Multiple different people
reporting this. I think this is also coming from
NBC News on their national security desk.
Took out a big facility, the alleged drug boats are going on
like this seems distractionary to me and I don't understand the
nature of it. And none of that sounds like
America first to me. Call me crazy, but I read these
stories in the morning. I see that multiple agencies are
covering them, multiple different news agencies.
They're pushing out the idea that this is the thing.
It sounds like, hey, we're not getting it done where we need
to. We're not actually exporting the
number of people. We're not putting blood back
into the body or exporting the toxin of a of a bunch of illegal
aliens who are doing fraud. So maybe we can go over there
and Dick around in Venezuela if you guys think that I'm seeing
our chat, which is really funny to me guys.
I watch the show live and I actually read a lot of what you
guys put out there. Watching people say that somehow
going after and striking a dock in Venezuela is going to attack
the the Venezuelan ability to influence and meddle with our
elections technologically. It's sort of an absurd.
Just listen to yourself and you ask me if that makes any sense.
You guys decide, you tell me and put in the comments below.
Do you think that striking a dock lethal or not lethal
blowing up boats in the Caribbean, whether you agree
with the, the you know, the drugs coming in or not headed
here or not, Like regardless, is any of that stuff going to
change the, the election system in the United States?
Or is that all just kind of like bread and circus distractions
and people cheering like seals when they declassify another
video from thermal, you know, images of a of a drone dropping
stuff on it. Like it's cool to use military
toys. It's cool to put up a Predator
Drome or a Reaper or something, or drop some sort of ordinance.
Doesn't seem to benefit me. I'm sure it benefits whoever's
like the weapon manufacturer that gives an opportunity to put
another couple hours of of maintenance into it and another
set of armaments. But these are symptoms.
These are not fixing the problem.
Not to me. And our government continues
unabated doing the exact same thing that it's always been
doing. All right, all of that is to
say, let's let's let's go to this this craziness that just
dropped today. And this is a good place to have
a little like kind of a a Segway cut.
So if you guys are watching over on YouTube, I appreciate it.
If you guys are listening on Rumble or if you're listening on
any of the audio apps, rather check us out on Spotify, Kyle
seraphinshow.com. This is going to be a hyper fast
and then refresh on some of the stuff that we talked about
yesterday with Steve Baker. I'm going to run through the
document that we briefed in a short like maybe 5 minute
segment. And then I also want to cover
down some new stuff that was just filed because you're
watching live, make sure you hit the thumbs up.
If you're watching in the replay, hit the thumbs up.
YouTube Rumble X please do that subscribe share.
We've crossed over the 18,000 subscriber boundary, which is
awesome. And that comes from you guys
doing what you guys are doing. Let's do let's do some
documentation, which is a little bit, it was a little bit of a
yawn, but we're going to do a quick run through the highlights
from yesterday. And by the way, you, you may
hear a Spotify ad right about now.
People get mad when they don't get the heads up on it.
OK, so this is the government's memorandum in support of
pretrial detention. I went over this long form with
Steve Baker. If you guys want to listen to a
nice conversation and hear that Steve Baker is alive and well.
I think he actually got stronger through yesterday's interview by
doing the work we had this morning conversation real
quickly. I actually do believe that the
Holy Spirit gives you strength to do things even when you don't
otherwise have them in your body when you're doing the thing
you're meant to do. My experience of that was going
on Fox News when I had COVID and I had like 105° fever and I went
into like a studio that was just me and one other person in there
and I think he was fine. But I walked in there.
I drove down to go to Phoenix to be on this Fox News hit with
Bongino for the first time on Fox, and I was deathly ill.
Like I thought I was going to die.
I just felt awful. And I walked in and the minute I
got to the studio, like the fever left, the chills left and
I was fine. And I whirled in there and I did
the interview and I, you know, sat there for 45 minutes in the
chair and all that kind of stuff.
And I finished up and I left. I got back in the car and
immediately I started driving and I felt like death again.
And I think that was the situation that that was for
Steve yesterday. He felt stronger and
strengthened by doing this work. This work is really important.
Talking about this case, so I I was reminded of the concept of
time being a flat circle. If you guys have never seen True
Detective, it's one of my favorite shows ever.
I watched it the I watched it non-stop on loop when I was at
Quantico for the FBI Academy. Time is a flat circle is
something that Matthew McConaughey says that is the
reason we're for today's thumbnail.
All right, I'm going to show it here.
There's this iconic moment where he's sitting in an interrogation
room by the cops. They're trying to figure out if
he did something evil and he brings up a beer can and
squishes it, and he's doing all the stuff.
He's building all these figures and he's involved in, like
hunting down some real dark evil.
He talks about time being a flat circle.
Keep that in your mind, time visualized externally as a flat
circle. Let's go through this really
quickly. This is the stuff that the
government filed. There's a couple of really
bizarre moments, and I think these are the biggest holes in
the story. They're supposed to be a
detention hearing today. We'll find out if that actually
goes down #1 We covered the fact that he was driving a 2017
Nissan Sentra. It's a dark blue color, and it
passed a license plate reader at 7:10 PMI need you guys to
understand that this is the timeline that is relevant to
this case. We're going to do a quick brief
on it, OK? The time starts at 7:34.
This document the government provided does not tell us
anything new. They don't claim to have any
other video footage. In fact, they rely on his
confession to say where he was before and after the loop that
you're seeing on the screen right now, which is the little
area where the DNC and the RNC are located in Washington, DC,
7:34 PM, January the 5th, 2021. There's a red ingress route that
you're seeing where he goes crosses down from the middle
heads up on New Jersey. He goes across D street, goes
down, drops the bomb includes the the moment we're sitting
underneath the the Bush and then the yellow is the egress route.
I'm saying he because that's what the government is alleging
that he Brian Cole did this. I obviously don't believe that.
Then disappears off camera at 8:00 PM.
So 7:34 to 8:00 PM. There's a gap in the video
footage and then the bike bomber in the hoodie appears again at 8
O 8:00 PM in 10 minutes is able to drop off the bomb at the RNC
behind the Capitol Hill club and then disappears.
Egress is off. And allegedly, according to this
document that we see the government has posted, Brian
Cole junior confessed to being parked at 2nd and D Street,
which is near Folger Park. I believe if we actually see the
video of this, what we found out are a couple things.
Number one, number one, finding from this, this, this document,
there's videotaped interview. I was worried they didn't do it,
but they videotaped the interview with Brian Colt Junior
for all four hours. That's what we're told.
Number 2, they answered the question of where are the Nike
Air Max Speed turf shoes? And the answer is they're gone.
Don't worry about it, OK? They've been, they've been
destroyed. He got rid of them.
They were ratty and so they're gone.
So now we've answered 2 questions.
Did did the confession get taped?
Yes. What happened to the shoes?
Well, they're gone. Don't worry about that.
They're gone. What about the bomb making
material? One of the questions I asked
early on is what what about the the bomb part of the bomb, the
explosive material? Well, he claims he got rid of
them. He got rid of them.
He dumped him in a dump. The problem is this filing
actually undercuts that while they make that argument thing #3
how come they didn't find him earlier and some of this other
stuff? And the answer is like, oh, he
was like super security conscious and he was like wiping
his phone all the time. Except the problem is that he
didn't wipe his phone for the 18 months after the the alleged
crime. He was able to go and run around
Washington, DC, apparently with his phone on him in his own
vehicle with stuff that he bought with his own credit card.
And then he was so security conscious that he waited until
like June of 2022 before he started wiping his phone
compulsively and did so 942 times after the crime.
That's absurd. So I'm scrolling through some of
the stuff on the high points. They didn't actually add any
value. What I think they did is they
actually took away from their own case by making this filing
that was supporting his detention.
They also make some arguments in there that are pretty unsettling
that basically it's the presumption of not innocence.
The DOJ is arguing that the the crime is so heinous and
dangerous that he cannot be trusted to stay out as a free
man. OK, the sneakers are gone, the
bomb making materials gone. The only problem with that is
they also make the argument we're going to skip the cell
phone pings for a second. They also make the argument that
while he got rid of all the bomb making materials, he also kept
buying freaking bomb making materials after the fact.
And we found that out yesterday that he bought bomb making
materials three weeks after January 6th and the placement of
those bombs on 1/21/21, he bought another kitchen timer.
Keep that in your mind. Time is a flat circle like an
egg timer. OK.
He also bought more pipe bomb size 8 inch pipes with nipple so
threaded on both sides. He bought more end caps.
He claims per his his confession that he drilled them by hand.
I made this comment yesterday to Steve Baker.
I'll make it again to you all. Drilling end caps, rounded steel
with a, with a carbide bit that's meant to go through steel
and a hand drill is very difficult.
Even if you're skilled at doing so.
You have to start with a detent or a, or a nail punch or a, or a
metal punch that's going to give you a like a starting point.
And even if it has a good pilot point, often times they do
what's called walking. The bit is spinning really fast,
which makes it really easy to kind of slide around.
So you leave all these sort of like scraggles and and
squaggles. What we saw on the on the bombs
as they were presented in the actual case file, I'll show them
to you guys on here. We've seen some pictures of the
end caps and they look like they're very cleanly drilled and
they're well filed. You know, like somebody who had
a vice and A and a drill press. Now I'm open to them showing us
that there's all kinds of walking, you know, walking
squiggled lines from a car by bit walking and somebody
drilling it by hand. But that's not what I saw in the
pictures that I saw of those end caps.
Now I don't know where I've seen the end cap, so I'll have to go
and try to find those pictures again.
But they seem very clean and well placed and that's a big
deal. So he he manually built these
things. He didn't build any bombs after
the fact, but he was interested in building potassium chlorate,
which is used in fireworks. He got rid of the shoes, he got
rid of the bomb making materials.
He kept buying bomb making materials.
He felt so guilty about seeing himself on video that he got rid
of the bomb making materials. That included buying them right
after the fact. So he had all these things and
this kitchen timer, I think it's going to end up being the
demise. We don't know that it's the same
kitchen timer that was found on the bombs and that seems really
important. We don't know that that was the
exact same one. They just mentioned that it was
a kitchen timer. If you guys look at the bombs as
they are actually shown here, it's not the entire kitchen
timer. The the the the timer part of it
or the housing was removed. So I don't know if they were
able to lock these things up. But this does not seem rock
solid. In fact, it seems the opposite
of the case. And we find out that the sulfur
that he bought supposedly, which was a part of the the homemade
black powder was bought as early as may.
Let me double check the the date here.
I don't want to get it wrong. I think it was like May of
sorry, it was January of 2018. So starting back years prior,
over 2 years prior, he was preparing to drop bombs in
Washington, DC. There it is on the screen right
here. Sulfur 1 LB Amazon 1/14/2018.
So those are the major pieces. We answered the story of the
shoes, we answered the story of the bottom making materials.
Where was the rest of it? Apparently he bought more of
them though, even though he throw them out, we have a
confession of where he placed the car and that he was not seen
getting out of the vehicle. The government does not allege
that they saw him getting out of the vehicle wearing the outfit.
So we're now 100% in the category of he was sharing this
through confession, the confession he denied for two
hours during that confession that he was involved in this.
Then he was threatened with another felony for lying to the
FBI, gave a 15 second audible pause, put his head down, put
his head back up and said yes, I did it.
And then basically told them everything they wanted for the
next 90 minutes. But first they left him alone
for 20 more minutes to Stew. This is important.
I think, and I am reading in here, this is Kyle Serif's
analysis. So take it for what it is.
There's some seriously interesting stuff in a most
recent filing that went out yesterday.
Sorry, it came in today. Document 23 in this case.
Guys. Ready for this one, because this
one's fun. Time is a flat circle.
I found out from our listeners this morning that people with
autism tend to use kitchen timers or other physical ways of
representing time. They need an externalized
version of it. Allow me to show you.
It made me go and do this. Look, this is just a quick AI
overview. Kitchen timers, especially
visual ones, are powerful tools for autistic individuals because
they externalize time. They create structure.
They reduce anxiety during transitions like from playtime
to chores. They help manage and focus like
only 10 minutes left and having a visual cue.
They help build independence by making abstract time concrete
and manageable. And they give control to
individuals. It often helps boost their
success when it comes to living on their own.
And there's a whole bout. I'm going to put this search
results. I'm going to put these over in
the in the show description of the links.
It'll be a long link that says the Google search, but I want
you guys to be able to see it. I, I basically did autism
connection to kitchen timers. That was the search.
If you guys want to do your own search now, nobody had confirmed
previously that this guy was in fact autistic.
That's something that the family said he was autistic.
Like it was something that I heard from neighbors that he
had. He presented himself as though
he were an autistic person. That was kind of thing
developmentally delayed. So the question was, is he
actually autistic or are we just using that term loosely because
it defines people that sort of don't fit in and have developed
developmental delays? This is where this gets really
good. The defendant, Brian Cole
junior, respectfully submits this response in opposition to
the government's motion for pretrial detention.
They also submitted 1 yesterday that said the government needs
to turn over discovery immediately, not later now, and
they should have access to it, which they should have already
done. It says Mr. Cole should be
released pending trial because governing multi factor analysis
demonstrate that bail is required under a strict set of
circumstances and they propose it.
They are asking for him to be released from detention.
And I think it's very interesting how they did so.
The government presumes that basically he's so dangerous he
can't be allowed out. And they are taking the
opposite, saying that the government has the burden of
proof and they have not met that burden to show that he cannot be
let out. I'm paraphrasing some of this
stuff, but let me get to the part that's most interesting to
me. On Page 3 says the the burden of
the government is far greater than merely reciting Cole's
criminal charges and concluding without any more that he is
quote UN quote, dangerous. Again, they are basically
operating under the presumption of guilt, which is not the way
our justice system works. The question is whether or not
he is a present danger, a contention the government has
never actually made. And something belied the the
opposite is actually belied by his past four years because he's
lived without incident and caused no additional harm.
So here's the facts that they cite.
And this stuff just snuck in there is really, really
critical. I put it over.
I pinned it on my social media right now #1 Mr. Cole is an
African American adult who's been diagnosed with Autism
spectrum Disorder level 1 and with Obsessive pulsive Disorder.
He's an ASD level 1 and A and an OOCD sufferer.
At this point that has not previously been confirmed.
I'm guessing that's what they got out of their analysis
recently #2 He has 0 criminal history.
He has no issues complying with court orders.
He's a High School graduate who's had continual employment
since his teenage years. All of these things work in his
favor. This is someone who, just like a
lot of the January Sixers, shows no previous inclination towards
danger, nor any past inclination.
And of course, it's the it's the predicate that we're we're
advertising here that he didn't do this.
Mr. Cole's lived in the same community since childhood
without incident. His neighbors and others who
have dealt with him over many years can vouch for his
character, to include, as you heard from Steve Baker, going
and knocking on doors, Secret Service, FBI, local and state
law enforcement, other federal employees.
He's surrounded by people that are working for this government
and nobody thought he was a problem.
His neighbors who have dealt with him over many years vouched
for his character. He has a reliable job waiting
upon release. He works for his father, which I
think is amazing. I think it's great that the
family member is able to give him purpose in the world.
He submits the house arrest, submits to an ankle monitor,
weekly reporting. He submits to unannounced
pretrial visits by pretrial services.
No one was actually harmed as a result of his conduct.
I think that's critical because these bombs were inert, as was
briefed to me and others, and no property was damaged as a result
of the conduct for which he's been charged.
Nothing happened, and yet the government thinks he should be
locked away. I go to this thing from from
Autism Speaks, which is a website, an organization that is
dedicated to kind of giving information about autism.
Somebody asked me today on social media.
Most local law enforcement and state law enforcement agencies
get regular annual training on how to deal with autistic
individuals because the prevalence is way higher than
it's been and it's very specific and how you deal with them.
The question was, is how much training do FBI agents get in
dealing with autistic individuals?
The answer is none. I've never heard of it.
I never got any and I have to imagine that was pretty common.
I don't think anybody gets specialized training on how to
deal with autism spectrum disorder as a subject.
And so they go through the different levels.
Because he was diagnosed as a level 1.
Level 3 is sort of profoundly autistic, requiring substantial
support. There's people there that are in
non verbal, they have non social, bunch of other things
that are kind of there that's not him.
So restricted behaviors. Level 2 is requiring substantial
support, can have verbal deficits, non verbal
communication skills, social impairments, even if they have
support systems in place. That's not him and he's level 1,
which is sort of the lowest level.
So it goes one to three in terms of severity.
Requires support. Without supports in place,
deficits in social communication can cause noticeable
impairments. This is visually relevant to
people who are in the neighborhood they recognize as
seeing him walk around. Without social supports in
place, the deficits in social communication will cause
noticeable impairments. Difficulty initiating social
interactions, as confirmed by the the 711 owner that Steve
Baker interviewed. Clear examples of atypical or
unsuccessful responses and social overtures may appear to
have decreased interest in social interactions.
A person who is able to speak in full sentences and engages in
communication, but the whose to and fro communications with
others fails. So just though they may be able
to present themselves or answer questions, doesn't mean that
these things make a lot of sense to them.
And the timers are quite interesting because we have at
least three documented purchases of timers.
And you all pointing out to me that timers have a significant
ability for folks who have a hard time transitioning between
time and taking the concept of time that we can see on a clock,
for example, and translating it into a mechanical flat circle.
Time is that flat circle for them.
Being able to take that and translate it into something
meaningful. I can imagine 20 minutes of not
being able to see. The 20 minutes felt like
eternity. Sitting inside a an
interrogation room with FBI agents who are accusing you of
something pretty aggressive. They also mentioned restrictive
and repetitive behaviors. We found out that he has OCD
often times categorized by sort of like ticks or these
repetitive motions to soothe. You'll see people doing light
switches or turning doors or flipping locks or ticking their
head back and forth or rubbing something.
These are self soothing characteristics that are
basically trying to make order out of chaos, take control of
things that they feel like they don't have control of.
Combine together. You have somebody who's doing
something and and should have actually probably had a very
specific type of interview that it that doesn't sound like you
did and it's videotaped. So that's going to be damning
for the government's case. And my, my evidence to you is
the fact that we had a guy who wore his, he wore his, his
earphones in ADOD or a DOJ rather in processing picture.
They took a mug shot, processed him in for criminal charges and
they allowed him to keep personal devices like his
earphones on, which are a soothing and a comfort
mechanism. And that's something because
they had to have known at that time that if they took those
when they probably did. To be fair, I don't know if that
part was videoed, but we could get it from we could get it from
the agents that actually did it. They should be put on the stand
and asked that. What happens when you try to
remove those earphones? Oh, he lost his mind.
He flipped his shit and we wanted to keep him calm so we
can get our confession. I'm going to put the map on the
screen one more time. From 7:34 to 8:00.
The DNC bomb bomber was visible on camera, disappears for 8
minutes from eight O 8 to 818 that window from 7:34 to 8:18.
If Bryan Cole Junior is somewhere else in Washington, DC
in the general vicinity of these pings, which is what it looks
like is going on. Because when you look at the
pings as mapped by our friend Armitas over on X, the pings, at
least two of them fall very clearly outside of the area that
they are meant to fall within. Ping #3 is on the margins.
Ping number 2 is in the center. Ping #4IS outside.
Ping number one is well outside. So you have at least three of
the major pings that the government's case hinges on to
be able to identify Brian Cole Junior.
And here is their exhibit from that document that we showed you
yesterday. Those are massive swaths of
Washington DC. And it'll be very easy to ping
against all of those things and not be anywhere near where the
pipe bomber thing is. Again, normally what you do is
you'd identify the person there and then you would go and you'd
say, aha, this person is physically in the place and we
can identify them. And by the way, the cell phone
pings confirm that that was their cell phone.
What they did is they said cell phone things are generally in
the area. There's someone walking around.
We believe it's this guy because his car was driven and and
that's it. And by the way, he bought the
things that would be necessary to build these bombs.
They went about this case backwards and it was obvious
from the complaint that that's the case.
You can call the Patsy file or anything else you want.
At the end of the day, they picked a target of convenience
and they're slowly leaking out that they got the wrong guy.
I'm guessing they didn't know that he was autistic.
I'm guessing that they didn't go interview the neighbors and find
out the things. And here's the crazy part again,
there are federal agents that live within a few houses of this
guy and they would have been available if you were doing a
good job. All of this is starting to look
more and more intentional to me. I'm not trying to be
conspiratorial. I'm just saying that the odds
look more favorable that you've got federal law enforcement
because they're not going to be embarrassed by this.
But the guys who are running it and the guys who took the the
victory lap the other day, the cash Patels, the Dan Bongino's,
the the Jeanine Pirro's, the Pam Bondi's, Darren Cox's that were
high fiving each other saying we got him.
How many of you are going to remember the the assistant
director of the Washington Field office?
Not very likely. You're going to remember Patel
and Bongino when this thing explodes and you're going to
know. I just wanted you to know that
this this whole this whole case is going to slowly unravel.
And I do think that's the reason why Steve Baker was strengthened
as he was speaking yesterday. So consider that most of you
probably had these materials. Consider that most of you
probably couldn't do a real decent hole in a, in the top of
a curved steel end cap without it walking on you unless you
have a drill press. And then consider they explained
away the things that were so important to this case that were
the, the, the whole reason that they were actually honing in on
the subject. They were.
Remember how important those shoes are?
They threw it away with a single line.
Oh, yeah. He got them and he got rid of
them. They got ratty.
So don't worry about the shoes. What about the bomb part of the
bomb? Oh, yeah, He threw that out too.
But did he buy more of them? Yeah.
Yeah, actually, he did buy more of them.
What about the phone wipe? Well, he wiped it.
That's why we put it in the device.
But then again, he didn't wipe it for 18 months after the crime
because he didn't actually see it.
None of that confession is going to hold up.
I'm just going to go on record right now saying the analysis of
what they've put out there is garbage and they must know this,
which is why the government tried to take it out of the out
of this detention hearing that's supposed to happen today.
Out of the pretrial hearing where they get to discuss
probable cause and try to take it to a grand jury where they
can indict it in front of a group of citizens and they don't
have to share everything. Remember, you could indict much
more easily than you can't handle.
If you decide to charge by complaint and you don't get a an
indictment right away, then you're going to be subject to
putting in front of a judge who actually understands what's
going on. And I'm going to tell you, as I
told people that are listening to this program in or out of the
FBI, people who are attorneys, people who are journalists, the
stuff that we've seen is exculpatory to the point where I
can almost guarantee you there's no conviction in DC.
I don't think a jury of DC liberals, white or black,
Hispanic or otherwise, are going to look at it and say this guy
did this thing based on the standard that is required in in
federal law, which is that it has to be beyond a reasonable
doubt because I've got reasonable doubt on my computer
right now. Hopefully we don't get hacked by
the FBI for that. That's where I wanted you guys
to see this is this is an ongoing thing and there may be
some more information tomorrow if they hold this hearing.
And it has what it should have in it.
And I hope, I hope they throw this thing out.
I hope they let this guy out right away.
I hope that as you guys are saying, I hope they free your
coal. It's funny.
We can be, we can, we can play with this.
We should be a little bit irreverent because we're talking
about a government agency. This is not making fun of Brian
Cole. This is making fun of the agency
that went after him and set this thing up in such an awful way.
All right, that's today's program.
I know that was long. I've been going longer and
longer and some of the stuff I think needs to be done.
That's what happens when I'm off air for like 5 days and I'm
having more stuff to cover down on.
Make sure you're supporting the program at kyleserifinshow.com.
If you are listening in the aftermath and you are not
getting the visuals, you are missing out on a big piece of it
because we show maps and we show pictures and we show videos.
So check them out. Kyle serifinshow.com.
You can also join us on locals at kyleserifin.com if you're
looking for any of the links. Otherwise, you can find them on
Rumble and you can find them on YouTube and you can find them in
the comments below like there. Subscribe there to the program
wherever you guys are watching and make sure you share it with
a friend. Turn the notifications on if you
want to see us go live. I brought you a pallet cleanse
today because this guy seems like he's speak in my language.
I kind of like to just get away from people.
I actually like not seeing human beings a lot.
It's my favorite. There is nothing worse than when
you go to your quiet place and and then people show up in your
quiet place and they make you do the thing that you were trying
to avoid, like small talk. Found this on Instagram.
This guy's got a good sense of humor for it.
Many of you probably feel the same way.
You are not recharged by finding people in your quiet place.
So you know, if you go out in the woods and you see somebody
else, you can ignore them. It's OK.
It's hard for us. Probably, probably.
We could be more like Brian Cole in that way.
Oh. What are you doing out here in
the woods? I'm trying to get away from it
all. Nice, man.
What are you doing in the woods? I'm trying to get away from it
all, too. Oh, sick.
I feel like I have to make small talk with you now, and I don't
really want to do that. Me either.
That's the whole reason I can't. Oh, yeah.
There's a bunch of guys in the woods already.
No, you got to go, man. There's too many guys in the
woods already. I'm just trying to get away
from. We were doing that first, trying
to get away from it all because then we are the all that's
trying to be gotten away from. Today's my only day off, so I'm
not leaving Shane. Oh really?
What do you guys do for? Don't do that small talk with
us. Is this where the party is?
No. Who are you now?
I heard there's a ton of guys in the woods, so I came out here to
party. No, we're trying to get away
from it all. There's way too many guys out
here to be getting away from it. You're making it work.
Go home, man. There's so many guys out here.
I'm going to come back and open a business.
You better know, don't even think about it.
Hey. Isn't that how it goes?
It's like, man, I really love being out here in the wilderness
by myself, Maybe I can monetize this.
Don't do it. Leave us alone.
If you guys see somebody in the woods that doesn't want to talk
to you and they don't want to make eye contact, keep your
phone in your Faraday bag and just move on.
Anyway, that made me laugh. I hope it makes you laugh a
little bit too. The world may be fallen and
screwed up, but it doesn't mean that we can't go and get away
from everybody every once in a while.
We'll see you again tomorrow. I hope you have a fantastic day.
Hang in there, this year's almost over.
Next year's going to be very interesting, I think, for a lot
of reasons. See you tomorrow.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin show, streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Serafin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle
Serafin.