Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, welcome
to the Kyle Seraphin show. We are rolling.
We are live right now on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
We are over on X and we appreciate you guys following us
over there and you can find us on locals.
It's Kyle seraphin.com. Today we're going to talk about
something, something kind of ugly and I think I'm going to
upset some of you. I just have that instinct that
today is going to be one of those shows where I'm going to
hit some of you where you feel it.
We're going to be talking about entitlement.
The word entitlement is going to be a prevalent theme throughout
all of the topics that I want to hit today.
We're going to be talking about, let me just kind of like do a
quick survey here. We're going to be talking about
people attempting to stop the mass firings at DOGE, and that
means we're going to be talking about government workers in the
federal government. We're going to be talking about
state workers in the state of New York, including a prison
guard strike. We're going to be talking about
Zielinski, the president of Ukraine.
We're going to be talking about illegal aliens inside the United
States who think they have a right to stay here.
We are going to be talking about IVF, in vitro fertilization.
We're going to be talking about Catholic Bishops asking for more
money to be able to help, quote UN quote, migrants, AKA illegal
aliens that are inside the United States.
And we're going to be talking about the media.
And all of these things, I believe, can be sewn together
under this banner of entitlement.
The reason that when we look inside at all of those problems,
and they're all significant, the overwhelming and the overarching
theme that flows through all of these people is a sense of
entitlement. And I pulled up a definition
because I was curious. Well, first of all, I wanted to
know, are there any pathological disorders that are associated
with the, the trait of entitlement?
And the answer is, is things like narcissistic personality
disorder, borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality
disorder. A lot of these personality
disorder types, the things that make people like incompatible
with others. Entitlement is a big symptom.
It is a, it is a, a worldview that causes significant issues.
And that doesn't matter whether you're looking at a protest that
is happening outside the the state capitol in Austin, TX.
I've got some funny footage from Owen Troyer talking to this.
The people that are on the wrong side of the abortion debate.
I did say the wrong side 'cause it's pretty clear even when they
start speaking, just let them open their mouth and say it.
It's entitlement to think that killing off another person is
your right. Yeah.
So we're going to get into entitlement and I think it's, I
think it might be one of the biggest sort of failings.
It's a parental failing often times if you let your kids grow
up with a sense of entitlement. All right, that's where I'm
going to go. And so brace yourself because it
kind of probably get ugly for some of you.
I guarantee some of you are going to be pissed off about it.
Oh, even more. We're going to talk about that.
The airliner that flipped again, entitlement, all of those
things. Before we get started, let's
talk about something that in addition to entitlement, nobody
likes being sick. I am the the weakest person when
I'm sick. And the one thing that I
definitely don't want to do is have to make decisions.
That's the hardest thing to do when you're feeling terrible
because all you want to do is lay around and do nothing.
If you're an adult, you've been sick, you know what it's like if
you want to avoid sort of that that crisis, Do I go to a
doctor? Do I solve this problem or do I
just do the thing I know I need to do?
You can go to TWC dot health slash Kyle and you can prepare
instead of repair. You can limit one of the worst
things, running errands, sitting in pharmacy lines, waiting in
doctors waiting rooms, trying to wait for someone to see you to
tell you the thing that you already know about yourself.
You already know how to solve that problem.
Most likely if you've lived enough life, you can go ahead
and get an emergency medical kit at TWC dot health slash Kyle.
You could also check out the contagion emergency kit if you
want one of these things. Both of them have things like
ivermectin. They both have a Z pack, also
known as azithromycin. You can get amoxicillin.
They're going to have on the contagion side, you're going to
have Tamiflu, which is only useful like early on in the flu
symptoms. If you get it later on, they'll
just tell you you're wasting your time.
And then the other option is getting something for your
airway, a corticosteroid, which is in a nebulizer form.
If you guys want to get prepared for illness so that you know,
look, you're going to be around other people, There's a
possibility you bring it home with you from work or your kids
bring it home from school. If you don't want to be
destroyed and having to figure it out after the fact, go to TWC
dot health slash Kyle. It's a 2 minute intake form.
After you finish your order, make sure you do the intake
form. They'll ship it to you, US
customers only. And again, use that promo code
Kyle. You'll save yourself like up to
$40 off. So definitely worth your look.
Control your own health, folks. We're talking about more about
that too. All right, here we go.
So entitlement again, we're going to just keep hammering at
home. I said it yesterday, I said it
yesterday. And my wife, she said sometimes
I like listening to what you have to say, which is nice when
you're married to someone who says that.
It's nice listening to what you say because I have that
instinct, but I don't have the word per SE.
And so whenever I am listening to you articulate it, I go, ah,
yes, that is the thing. And this is really going to be
your gift for the day. Entitlement and being able to
diagnose entitlement to be able to give it a name because once
people hear it, there's nothing positive associated with that
term. Again, I'm looking through
Google's sort of AI overview of it.
A sense of entitlement is a symptom that can can be part of
different personality disorders. The sense of entitlement or
symptoms entitlement include feeling that rules don't apply
to them. How often does that make sense?
Believing that they deserve recognition, rewards or other
things that they, in fact, have not earned.
Or I remember Tom Segura talking about shopping for a luxury jet
in one of his comedy routines. He's like, yeah, I just do go
down the rabbit hole of doing online shopping, and then
suddenly I'm looking for the private jet that suits my needs
best when in reality, I can't afford a private jet.
I'm just looking at things like if I was out there shopping for
a yacht, I don't have the ability to have a yacht, one of
the ability to maintain a yacht or afford a staff for a yacht.
I certainly don't know how to pilot a yacht.
And if I was out there doing that, there's a sense of
entitlement, believing, as Tom Segura said, again, a comedian,
but sometimes hitting on those truths, that there is something
that I have not quite earned that I believe that I should be
associated with. And so this goes on and on.
Craving attention and admiration, Symptoms of
entitlement, struggling with criticism, Having an exaggerated
sense of self worth, feeling superior to others when in fact
you are not. How many of those things apply
right now to those in the political left?
I think a lot. I think a lot of them in fact
do. And so this is kind of the funny
part. There's an expectation that by
default, we are the good guys. You're always the hero in your
own story, are you not? Nobody wants to go out there and
say that you're the villain in your own story.
Your friends that do that, they are the most interesting friends
because you're kind of like, hey, man, how come you're not
the good guy when you tell the story?
Right now we're seeing this happen and it's playing out in
the court system because the expectation is that the left who
is now filing cases against Donald Trump, they've already
set it up. They've already set up the
narrative. The narrative is very obvious.
Orange man bad. We can get into more
sophisticated versions of it. But when you actually ask people
on the street, hey, what is it that Trump's done that you hate?
They're just like, yeah, he's threatened Constitution and he's
a Nazi and he has really bad ideas.
And I don't, I don't, I don't like him.
He's taking my rights. It's like, do you have any
evidence for this Is, you know, again, you're not going to
convince them by telling them they're wrong.
What you can do is you can go to that self revelatory moment
where you ask all the questions. Well, what are those things?
And so I've got some funny video, like I said, of, of Owen
Shroyer, who is a master troll. 1 Owen is very bright. 2, He's
fearless and he just does not mind people being upset with
him. So when he goes out there to ask
these questions, they're just they get funnier and funnier
like Elon Musk is a Nazi. You're seeing Elon Musk on the
screen right now. It says the judge denies the
request for temporary block of Doja's mass firing and access to
data. Again, there's this sense of
entitlement. 14 different state attorneys general are doing the
cosplay theater asking for a TRO.
They said this is coming from ABC News.
They said that they wanted a temporary restraining order on
an emergency basis and that was denied yesterday.
It was denied actually, while I was sitting in in at Altman's
podcast studio. I'm sitting there reading
through Twitter and I'm like, oh, look.
And of course it was AUS District Judge in DC.
This woman, Tanya Chuckin, who handled a bunch of J6 processes
denied an urgent request to block Elon Musk and the
government, the Department of Government efficiency.
Now, what's interesting is, is that this this organization,
news organization, ABC News continues to talk about Elon
Musk like he's the boss and so has Donald Trump, but the court
filings are saying something different.
So everyone's trying to get to the bottom of it.
What is Elon Musk's role in this organization?
But I do want you to consider that even the attempt to stop
this assumes that the states, the attorney generals of these
14 states have, they're entitled to the position of blocking the
federal government, doing the work of the federal government.
Now, Randon, we already had case law come out and say that the
president is both immune from prosecution but also has the
opportunity to do the job of the president.
Now in sharp contrast as well, because everything that I'm
seeing shows up in this contrast, Joe Biden was not
doing the job of the president. Suddenly the political left
cares who's running things in the White House.
They didn't care when maybe Hunter Biden, who was giving
advice to his dad. They didn't care when a
recovering drug addict guy who lost a gun and did all the most
irresponsible things. He was going after prostitutes
and collecting bags of money all over the world.
That guy was fine to be in the White House standing right next
to the president. I mean, I'm not sure if they
ever went into the Oval Office. I'm not sure if Joe Biden got
out of bed most days. That is one of the biggest
contrast that we see. So not only is there this sense
of entitlement that they should be able to stop what the
president's doing, they also think they should have unlimited
access to ask all the questions and get in his face.
And they've never asked those questions in the last four
years, which is a really weird moment.
Here's Fox News. I'm going to give you
contrasting opinions. Fox News asking the question.
Then we've got CNN doing the gotcha.
And then I've got some fun stuff from Stephen Miller, who just
kind of splashes these people because suddenly, apparently,
CNN discovered that there's a bunch of military veterans that
work for the federal government. They didn't give 2 rats about
Gerardo Boyle, my friend who's been on this program many times,
an FBI whistleblower who's now been unpaid for, like coming up
on 30 months. They didn't care about me.
They didn't care about Marcus Allen who testified in front of
in in front of the weaponization committee.
They didn't care about most of the the veterans that I know.
I had friends that had their I had a guy inside the FBI that
had his job suspended. He was thrown on the bricks,
what is what we call it, put out to unpaid and he did it.
He got thrown out because for one or two days while the COVID
vaccine mandates were coming down and they were shoving this
down everybody's throat. He put the Star of David in his
profile picture on his government linked account and
they said that offended a Jewish person in the middle of in a
meeting. No, you know, you know, no, no
grievance actually filed. That's how wild this has been.
So suddenly we now care again, I'm going to show you this out.
Who's who's in charge of those? What's, what's Elon Musk's role?
They feel very entitled to find out who the president's advisers
are and what their official titles are.
I don't understand why. I don't understand why it
matters if they're actually doing good work, which it seems
like they are. It seems there's been a lot made
of what Elon Musk's role is actually at DOGE.
The president has introduced him as the head of DOGE multiple
times in interviews. Yet there's this affidavit that
we've been able to get our hands on here that the press has as
well, that it contradicts the White House claim that he's the
head of DOGE. This, this affidavit actually
says he doesn't work for DOGE at all.
Reading directly from it, it says Musk is not an employee of
the US DOGE Service or the US Doge Service Temporary
Organization. That's according to the director
of the White House's Office of Administration.
So what is his role at DOGE? Sure, I'm happy to clarify.
Elon Musk is a special government employee here at the
White House serving at the direction of the President of
the United States, Donald Trump. Elon Musk has been tasked with
overseeing DOGE on behalf of the President and DOGE employees.
DOGE folks have been on boarding at respective agencies across
our federal bureaucracy as political appointees just like
any other political appointee gets on board with the new
administration with the changing of hands.
And those individuals are helping the secretaries at all
of our agencies that have been nominated and confirmed by
President Trump in the United States Senate to cut waste,
fraud and abuse at these respective agencies.
So there you go. There's the answer.
Asked and answered. It makes a lot of sense.
It's like, OK, they're political appointees.
They've come in under this program that the president has
the guy who's in charge of the executive and he's going to do
it. Now, here's The funny thing,
because because Chuckin, Judge Chuckin in DC is not
conservative and probably doesn't like any of this stuff.
And yet it's still going to be constrained by fact patterns
because it's going to be looked at again.
What judges don't like more than anything else is seeing their
opinion taken from a higher court and slapped out and
saying, hey, you screwed it up and you don't belong here.
That's that's a big, you know, slap in the face for these
judges. So here's what she wrote the
plaintiffs. This is a quote directly out of
the out of the the article, but the specifically out of the
decision quote. The plaintiffs asked the court
to take judicial notice of widespread media reports that
DOGE has taken or will take certain actions such as mass
terminations. But you can't substitute those
reports for quote, specific facts in an affidavit or a
verified complaint that clearly show immediate and irreparable
loss, injury or damage will result.
So there, that's what it is. It's you guys talked about
standing. You have to be able to document
that the thing that you want to stop either has stopped or will
stop that there's some report outside of like the news media
losing their minds about it. Here's NPR story.
Now, the funniest thing about this NPR story and it'll be
LinkedIn. Our are articles for the
episode, which you guys can always find at kyleseraphin.com.
It's always a free post so you guys don't have to be a member.
You do have to sign up for the locals community to be part of
our our posting, but you should be able to click through these
links if you just want to find out.
Hey, where you getting your information from?
It's always over at kyleseraphin.com.
Again, that's our locals community.
You could be a paid or an unpaid member and interact with the
folks there. Plenty of information that goes
on. This is a story that is quite
funny. Again, this is that sense of
entitlement that I get. And I listened to her own words
because this was an audio interview that was more or less
transcribed into this article. She worked for years to get a
federal job. Within a month, she was fired.
Now, there's an emotional component to this because
apparently this girl spent years working to land a federal job.
Let me tell you, as someone who spent years working to land a
federal job, it was two years just to get hired on by the FBI.
But in order to become someone who was interesting to the FBI
in the in the role of special agent, I went to the military.
So I probably spent a total of, I don't know, maybe six or seven
years, maybe eight years getting myself in a position to be hired
on by the FBI at the age of 35. And I got to work there for a
couple years, which was great. I got to reach the the ripe old
government position of GS13, which is the tenured rank or the
tenured pay grade of an FBI agent.
And I was unceremoniously removed because they pulled my
security clearance and accused me of a bunch of felonies and,
and misdemeanors. One of the misdemeanors, by the
way, that the FBI found in their internal affairs investigation.
To me, I just should share this with you guys because you
probably don't know this in the background.
They actually accused me of the misdemeanor crime of misusing
the FB is badge which I showed as part of the one of the
Chiron's in the early podcast days.
By having a picture of the FB is badge and a picture of the FBI
seal on a Wrecking Ball smashing the brick wall of America.
That was considered a misdemeanor according to the
FBI. I'm just telling you, when this
girl was crying about all the time it took to get the federal
job, So what? How entitled are you?
The funniest thing about being a federal employee, something that
is hammered into everybody that works in federal employment, at
least in my experience, almost all federal employments go
through what's called the one week.
It's the opening first week of employment.
It's like, here's your benefits and here's your package, and
here's your HR chain, and here's your whistleblower rules, and
here's all the different things that go along with it.
And here's the good and the bad and the ugly.
And this is what your employment means.
One of the things they tell you is that you're probationary for
two years, two years, you can be fired for no reason or any
reason. And I have friends who were
fired at the one year and 364th day mark.
I have a friend who was a prior cop who was removed the day
before his probation ended. And you know why it was?
It's because he didn't wear a jacket, a suit coat when he went
to go sit in the back of the gallery for an initial
appearance in Washington, DC in Criminal Court.
I'm not exaggerating. They took a guy that they spent
300 to $400,000 on adjudicating a clearance and then however
much money, probably another 150,000 to $200,000 paying him a
salary, developing him, sending him through various trainings
and pushing him through Quantico.
So you got, you got 21 weeks there plus all the on the job
training for two years. And they fired him for not
wearing a jacket because he embarrassed a female supervisor
who wasn't actually a supervisor.
She was an acting supervisor. That's how little your
employment means. Any reason or no reason?
This girl got fired within a month of being at the Department
of Energy, and the sad thing is she just really wanted to work
on clean energy solutions. Go to an energy company, honey.
If you want to go actually solve problems in the energy sphere,
find out what the market bears. It goes back to that guy we
talked about from NASA. If you don't have any idea what
to do, you can always go get a government job because they
won't demand a lot of you. There's no results required.
It's the the laziest way to work in any industry, but it does
give you good benefits. It's never the highest paying,
but it's never the lowest paying.
It's almost always the easiest work, and most of them have the
lowest amount of expectations on your performance.
Government employees do not get measured the way that you might
in the private industry. How do you know that, Kyle?
Because I worked in both. I was discussing this with Joe
Altman the other day. I worked at a movie studio.
I came in with no background in finance whatsoever and spent 18
months working multi $1,000,000 accrual projects for one of the
largest movie studios in the world.
Because I worked at it, I spent a bunch of time learning how to
do things you have to actually perform.
If you don't do your job in most businesses, they're not going to
keep you around because you're dead weight.
The minute you've been evaluated.
You're not entitled to keep working there.
All right, I'm going to read a little bit of this girl's story
because it is kind of funny, she said.
I was winding down for the day, and then all of a sudden I get a
notification ping. She reached for her government
phone, which had been issued to her just a month earlier when
she took a new job at the Department of Energy.
Everything about this female story, by the way, which is not
necessarily listed. I get the impression that she
worked from home. What a good gig.
You're 26 years old, you can work from home, you have, you
know, almost no expectations. You have no colleagues.
You can sit there in your PJS and you can do you know, maybe
your top up is professional and you're sitting in your pajama
flannels. The e-mail said the following
quote. Don't.
I'm sorry DOE, Department of Energy finds that you're further
employment would not be in the public interest.
The 26 year old was removed from a position effective today
immediately. Again, just like my friend Joe
who listens to this program, who knows exactly what I'm talking
about, you can be removed for little or no reasons at all all
the way up until your last day of probation.
So that's the job. And that's the the conditions
under which she signed up. Now everybody thinks they're
going to be able to work forever and they're crying in this
because she said this. This is funny.
This is the girl. She's going by the name Rose,
which is apparently her middle name because she doesn't want
retaliation. And she's thinking about, I
swear to God, she says it in the article.
She's thinking about sitting outside of the offices of the
Department of Energy hoping that they will pick her back up again
because she doesn't know what else to do.
That is entitlement. Go find a way to contribute to
society. You do not have any right to
your job. When the FBI kicked me out, you
know what I did? I didn't even file for
unemployment. I just went out there and tried
to figure out what the next thing was.
Luckily, I built myself a condition called financial
security where I had passive income so my kids weren't going
to starve. This girl's talking about how
she has a car payment. She's 26 years old, she's not
married. She's making bad decisions
already. Why do you have a car payment if
you if you just have a job for one month?
It doesn't make any sense, especially if she's in the DC
area. It's actually a terrible idea.
There's no parking there need. And I used to go to DOE to work
with the people that were in the counterintelligence program
there. She says people who've been in
the federal government for 30-40 years are like, we've never seen
this before. This is unprecedented.
And they also lost jobs. Good.
You're not entitled to it. What have you been doing for 30
or 40 years? If someone comes out there and
looks in and says, Oh yes, you're not doing anything, what
is it that you do here? As we've been kind of joking
about the sort of Bob's efficiency experts that come in
and do the evaluations on your on your position from office
space. If you don't have anything to
answer there, you're gone. And if you do have something
that you can do, then you don't have to worry about it.
They're very upset about this. CNN thinks they got it.
They've got Elon Musk, They're very upset about how do we try
to nail this guy down? So Elon is working for Doge, but
he's not working for Doge. And they think that this is
going to, to, to solve this problem.
Again, they are, they are, they are structuring a problem that
doesn't matter. How about is the stuff that Doge
is uncovering really troubling? Shouldn't Democrats also be
worried about fraud, waste, abuse of the government,
taxpayer dollar? No, they're trying to, they're
trying to counter Trump because they think that's going to win
again. They're picking the 20% on the
8020 thing. 80, the 8020 rule is that basically 80% of people
probably feel a certain way. Most people don't want their
taxpayer dollars squandered. I'm going to show you a bunch of
examples as we continue on. It's absurd.
And this lady, and I can't remember her name, she thinks
that she's smarter than she is. I'm going to show you some
really funny stuff when she tries to go head to head with
Stephen Miller, who's infinitely smarter than her and way more
Wiley and doesn't have a job as a as a stand up host at CNN.
He has a job like doing litigation and now he's working
on behalf of the US president. It's not an accident that this
guy's in this role. Documents filed by the Trump
administration are raising new questions about Elon Musk's role
in the White House. The filings say Musk is not an
employee, nor is he an administrator of the Department
of Government Efficiency, also known as DOGE.
Instead, the billionaire is described as an advisor to the
president, working as a special government employee.
And like other senior advisors, this filing says Musk has no
actual or formal authority to make government decisions
himself. With us now is Stephen Miller.
He is the White House deputy chief of staff for policy.
Stephen, thank you so much for taking time for us.
So who is in charge of DOGE? The President of the United
States. He's the administrator of Doge.
No, the Doge is the what was formerly US Digital Services.
It's an agency of the federal government that reports into the
Office of the Executive Office of the President, which reports
to the President of the United States.
He's just describing how the executive works.
And she's like, wait, who's in charge?
Like the answer of who's in charge of the DOJ at this point,
it's the president of the United States.
Why? Because he's the senior
executive. If you want to go to the top of
the chain of command, doesn't matter whether it's the
military, whether it's any civilian agency, they all go up
to one person. When we say the quote UN quote,
the government, most of the government is answerable to the
president. The difference is, is for the
first time, maybe in my lifetime, probably in yours as
well, the president is actually trying to be the one who's in
charge of it. Generally what happens is they
have these hands off policies and they just get further and
further and further ideologically captured and
further and further left. So when that happens, you're not
going to get the president is in charge of the agency.
Then they have to go down and play this little game.
This woman, Brianna, whatever her name is, Kaylor, and I don't
know how to pronounce her last name.
And I don't necessarily care. She tried to do these gotcha
moments. So she's asking Stephen Miller,
who's working on behalf of the president, who is the federal
workforce. Do you even know who the federal
workforce is? In sudden fashion, they now care
about veterans at CNN for the first time ever.
They don't really care about veterans.
They care about Democrats like Rose, who just got this new job.
And they want her to be able to be paid and in that space and be
able to work against the things that they want.
They want their policies carried out, whether or not it's the
policy of the president and, and you know, by extension, the
American people who elected him. They want something.
They're entitled to it. They believe the federal
government's job is to serve the things that they want, and how
dare you question it? So here it is, Stephen Miller
getting asked the question, who works in the federal government,
and he handles this one pretty well.
And then we're going to go even further because suddenly, like I
said, they realize that military veterans work there as well.
I'm going to draw heavily from this particular little article
or evidence because it's quite funny.
Does your administration understand who is in the federal
workforce? Yes, we have such a broad
question. Of course, they understand who's
in the federal workforce. And I'm happy to indulge all of
these very histrionic questions that anyone who may not be
fired. That it's 30% veterans.
I think that the. And that you have people who are
deployed. The the US government as $36
trillion in debt. The interest payments on the
debt exceed the National Defense budget.
The American people are exhausted and tired of watching
their tax dollars be corruptly spent, abused, wasted, and in
every sense robbed and stolen from them.
This president, for the first time in history, is committed to
restoring accountability at every level of the federal
government. You may assert there's no waste
in the Pentagon. You may assert there's no waste
in Treasury. You may assert there's no waste
in attention. She's 100% asserting that what
she wants done is what she wants done because they're advocates.
They're not doing reporting and they're not just asking hard
questions. They're coming with a
predetermined position. Do you even understand who works
here? It's crying, it's crying because
of the loss, and that is what they're going to call
accountability. But it's really just this
entitlement that we are supposed to be in charge of the
government because we're the good guys.
We already have decided that. Let me go back to the list here
again, because it's fun, right? Having an exaggerated sense of
self worth. That seems to be accurate right
there. Craving attention and
admiration, struggling with criticisms, feeling superior to
others, feeling the rules don't apply to them, believing they
deserve recognition, rewards or other things that they have not
in fact earned. All of these things are symptoms
of that word entitlement. Now here's where it gets really
fun. Like I said, suddenly CNN has
decided that there are in fact military veterans who work for
the federal government. Do you know who some of the
least entitled people that I knew were?
Because they dealt with really hard stuff and they knew how to
just move on. There's a, there's a term inside
those that that have worked in that kind of space.
Many of you may know it or a a turn of phrase.
The phrase is embrace the suck. There's another one that's a
little bit less fun. It's called Bohica, which you
guys will have to go look up on your own.
Some of you know Bohica. But embrace the suck means it's
not going to be good and we don't have a choice.
So onward we go. We're going to embrace the fact
that things are going to suck. It is something that I have
taken on. It is something that my friends
who are whistleblowers took on. And there's not a coincidence
that most of the people that step forward into the
whistleblower space, at least against the FBI, which is a very
scary entity to fight because DOJ has unlimited financial
resources. And you're not entitled to any
of them, by the way, and you're not entitled to protection.
It turns out there's not a coincidence that many of them
are met at military veterans. Marcus Garrett, myself, George
Hill, right? How about prior law enforcement
guys like Steve Friend? Entitlement is when you think
that the system is supposed to work for you.
And if not, then you sit and cry about it.
The people who know better know that Bohica is a principle and
that is time to just embrace the suck.
It's like it's going to be a bummer, but it's the right thing
to do. I love that chat is over here
running the BOHICA thing. If you guys don't know, you can
look over on our rumble chat. They will tell you what the what
the acronym BOHICA stands for. All right, here's here's this
woman again. Now she's going to own him and
she's going to talk about a thing called USERA.
The it's USERRA. I've got a little a break out on
this thing. It is the Uniform Services
Employment and Reemployment Rights Act.
We are about to see Stephen Miller get, quote UN quote,
owned by ACNN host. I'm going to show you why this
is not a real thing in just a second.
Ready. Here we go.
OK, Steven, so there are military members of the Guard
and Reserve. They are protected by law from
being fired from their day job while they're deployed.
I have learned that at one agency, an employee who's
actually currently deployed with the military has been notified
they've been fired. Does your administration
understand who actually makes up this workforce that they're
dismantling? I'm sorry, I'm confused by your
question. Is your question, does the
President have the authority to fire a member of the US
military? This is a this is someone who is
a federal employee and is currently deployed who has
government protection, as I'm sure you're aware.
There's a lot of. Protecting that.
I don't know what laws you're referring to.
I would love for you to be more specific.
So far you're not telling me, the employee, the agency?
Uniform services employment and reemployment rights act it's
well known by HR and the federal government and in in private
industry as. Well, OK, so you're saying that
the president, in your view, doesn't have the authority to
recall a member of the armed forces who may or may not, again
on the first time hearing of this, that may or may not be
serving overseas? Stephen, you understand how the
garden reserve work. They have a day job and then
when they're activated, they deploy.
While they deploy, that employment is protected by law.
OK, we're going to get deeper into that.
Before we do, how how about people that actually do care
about veterans, My friends over at Patriot Coolers, because
we're going to go ahead and plug them.
I'm sitting here with a large cup of coffee off screen.
This is one of their 30 oz tumblers, Patriot Coolers.
And one of the reasons why I like them as a company gives a
portion of all of their profits, everything that they make on all
of the, the things they sell back to veterans who need help,
you know, mobilizing around their home.
They have multiple charities. You guys can go and check it
out. A portion of all of their
proceeds go to support veterans charities.
My brother has actually seen and been present when they've handed
out those big checks, those sweepstakes checks.
If you want to support veterans, you want to support the Kyle
Seraphin show, you want to support a company that actually
has similar values probably to what you do, go to
patriotcoolers.com. The promo code Kyle will save
you 10%. It's the same discount you'd get
if you were a veteran or if you were a first responder.
They do a discount for that. But you can just use my promo
code. You don't have to plug your
information in Patriot coolers also has a Kyle Seraphin show
collection. You guys can find the link in
the show description and if you look over my shoulder up here
it's on the wall there it is there I can point out it's on
the wall. This is the black 30 oz as well.
It's got the the the suspendables logos, the flag,
the badge and so on. If you guys want to support our
program and support veterans and get yourself an awesome product
that you're never going to be disappointed with this is look,
it's like one of the best looking cups.
I carried it with me yesterday when I went to San Antonio.
I actually took two of them with me, including the first one I
ever got. I've been using them for quite a
while, so check them out. All right, are we ready for
this? Because I'm going to break it
down. This is the the the ACT I'm
going to throw it on the screen. It's going to be probably too
small for most of you to read if you're on your phones, but if
you're watching on the computer screen, you can read this.
The, the referenced the law is the Uniformed Services
Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, USERA, and it's well
known apparently to HR departments in the federal
government and private sector. And according to CNN, it means
that if you are deployed, you cannot lose your civilian job.
And that's false. It's absolutely false because
the what it protects you against is losing your job on account of
your military service. Again, this sense of entitlement
which is being applied to some service member and I don't think
it's real. You're protected against
discrimination for being a veteran.
If you are past, present, or have future military
obligations, you cannot be fired for that and you can sue to be
reinstated if that is the given reason.
If the person leaves for military service, it's required
that the employer reemploy them upon return, assuming that the
individual still meets the criteria for work.
There's all kinds of little cut outs here, and the biggest one
is RIFF. RIFF is a reduction in force.
This is the standard term for a government layoff in the context
of a riff. USERRA does not explicitly
prevent the employer from conducting layoffs, but it does
require that the service members military status not be used as a
deciding factor for whom to lay off.
In other words, you can't just say, well, we're going to lay
off everybody that's in the National Guard that's been
activated. That's illegal, but if you lay
off everybody in a specific department, then you can do
that. So this is a disingenuous
presentation by CNN trying to act like they think something.
Now they suddenly have discovered that there are
military veterans working inside the federal government.
They haven't give 2 rats about these people up until right now,
but they think it's a way to dunk on the sitting president
and it's nonsense. And again, it's a sense of
entitlement that they think that they're supposed to win.
And so they're going to show people how to do it.
I've got a clip from Chris Matthews who's really I didn't
realize Chris Matthews is 79 years old.
He's really showing his age right now.
He's talking about this sense of entitlement, this idea that
we're the good guys and the other guys are the bad guys and
that there is a way to to win and a way to lose.
But this is not it. And so we've got to go after
Doge. This is why I think he's
speaking the quiet part out loud on why they're going after
everything Elon's doing right now.
So let's just listen to this. This is over on MSNBC again.
Now we're going to go further, further left.
Yeah, well, there's a lot of rules out there about how to
behave when you're losing. But, you know, the big problem
is that Trump came in this time, this second time with a machine
gun, and he fired so many shots. He said, first of all, the
people that tried to kill Congress by attacking the US
Congress on January 6th, I'm going to pardon them all to let
you know where I stand. I'm with them.
That was a pretty clear statement.
I'm with Article 2, not article one.
I'm not with the Congress. I'm not looking out for you
guys. And when it came time for advise
and consent, which there's a whole book written about and a
whole it was a big issue, the right of the Congress to say no
to a cabinet appointment. He said you're not going to do
that because I'm going to shut you guys down.
And he did. So Tillis and Cassidy and
Collins, nobody taught. They shut down the Congress.
He said I'm the boss, and he just said the same thing
overseas. He said basically, let's see,
I'm going to have one of my guys over there is going to say that
Germany should go to the right. Germany should move to the
right. Now there's an interesting
foreign policy. I haven't seen that in the 20th
century. Certainly go to the right.
And that's what his vice president said.
I want you to accept the Afd, join the right, put up with
them. Not only put up with them,
tolerate and use them, bring them, bring them forth.
Go to the right, get to the right.
OK, So what is this problem? He thinks that the president is
now supporting the Article 2 powers of the president instead
of the Article 1 powers of Congress.
Who do you think started that? What kind of weird entitlement
is it that everybody has to do what we think when they're in
office? You have to play by the rules,
not the rules that we invented, the rules that we want you to
follow. How about we just read the
Constitution? Article 2, Section 2.
The president shall be commander in chief of the army and the
Navy in the United States and of the militia of the several
states. OK, that's pretty easy.
He may require the opinion and writing of the principal officer
in each executive department upon any subject relating to the
duties of their respective offices, and she'll have the
power to grant reprieves and pardons.
OK, so it's within his authorities as president to have
a reprieve or a pardon for the things that happened on January
6th. That's a constitutional power.
Deal with it. Except in cases of impeachment.
He can't do that. How about this clause #2 under
Section 2 of Article 2? He shall have the power by and
with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties,
provided that 2/3 of the Senate present concur, and he shall
nominate with the advice and sent of the consent.
Sorry. The advice and consent of the
Senate shall appoint ambassadors and other public ministers and
councils and judges of the Supreme Court, and so on and so
forth. The Congress may by law, that's
the appointment of such inferior officers as they deem
appropriate in the president alone and in the courts of law
or in the heads of departments. He should fill up all the
vacancies that happen during recess if necessary, right?
Like this is not crazy stuff. This is what the Constitution
says. These a holes.
It's so wild. They're the ones that are
talking about a constitutional crisis.
And yet it seems like they don't actually even know what the
Constitution says. It's, it says exactly what he's
supposed to do. The first section of Article 2
explains who can be president, how to be president, how you get
put in and how you get taken out.
If you guys don't read the Constitution, you don't know
what it says. So make sure you do, you should
carry a little pocket one with you or get the app.
It's real easy. Section 2 says what the duties
are. Section 3 says a couple of other
things about when we have the State of the Union, which by the
way, we've turned into this grand thing.
It's not even supposed. It says from time to time.
And then he's going to go and tell people what's going on,
that he's going to get ambassadors and other public
ministers and show up. All of these are constitutional
duties. He's the guy that's supposed to
go out and make the treaties and then the Senate's supposed to
approve them if they agree. He's doing that.
And they're very, very upset that suddenly he's decided he's
going to go talk to Vladimir Putin.
Imagine being mad about Donald Trump going forward and talking
to Vladimir Putin. We'll just go to the main piece
here He's made. This is this is CN NS headline.
This is the front of their front page today.
I, I kid you not, this is analysis.
Are you ready? Trump makes his most hostile
comments yet towards Zelensky. That's analytical.
That's an opinion. How do I know?
Because most hostile is a qualifier.
It modifies the type of comment and the only way that you could
do that, it is not objectively the most hostile.
It's what you believe. So it's not analysis.
As presented by Stephen Collinson, who's one of my
favorites hands down, because he's always a good example of
someone who just says what he feels.
It's emotional, it's entitlement.
Here's the the third paragraph things.
Sorry, this is the first paragraph.
This is the opening line of this particular article over on CNN.
It looked like things couldn't get any darker for Ukraine.
And then President Donald Trump spoke up.
Such analysis. That's not analysis.
That's your emotional opinion. You beta After cutting President
Vladimir Zelensky out of the 1st US talks with Russia on ending
the war, Trump on Tuesday falsely accused Ukraine of
starting the conflict that has ravaged its land and killed
thousands of its people. Yeah, it's terrible what's
happened there, by the way. It's absolutely atrocious.
But if you're the Big Brother and the little brother picked a
fight and you're the one who's been fighting the fight, or you
have been funding the fight, or the reason that the fight is not
over is because you are standing behind the little brother.
Do we care what the little brother wants to do to negotiate
out with the other guy on the other side, the bully, the big
person that's going on? No, the United States has
decided, for whatever reason, under Joe Biden, that we're
going to bankroll the entirety of the Ukrainian defense.
We are bankrolling NATO so that they can be part of it.
Everybody's going to go and put money in.
Do you know who has the biggest stake in there?
I mean, the biggest life stake is obviously the Ukrainians.
But financially, how many billions of dollars in treasure
has the United States government sunk into this conflict?
We have as much as a stake as anybody in talking about what
should end it. And so, no, we don't care what
Ukraine thinks. This puppet dictator who doesn't
want to hold elections, who Donald Trump said I think
accurately has plummeting just like he said, 4% approval
rating. It's probably not that low.
But Donald Trump speaks in hyperbole.
He doesn't do the BS that Joe Biden does where he's like, not
a joke. That's not hyperbole, man.
Whenever it was hyperbole, Donald Trump just says hyperbole
and then he just doesn't caveat. You could actually call Donald
Trump no caveats. That's the way he speaks.
They're really, really upset. So here's a little video.
This one is a pompous CNNA hole who's going to take one single
sentence out of a like dozens of minutes of him talking.
They're going to give you about 8 seconds of it.
I want you to hear how it's presented.
Again, the sense of entitlement is that we think that we should
be able to tell you exactly what the news is.
We're going to spoon feed you an opinion and you must accept it
and I'll show you another little piece in just a second.
Enjoy this like exchange between Jack Jake Tapper and some guy
who takes 1 less than one sentence from Donald Trump to be
able to give his opinion. Back in our world lead and
breaking news moments ago, President Trump weighing in on
the talks between his government and Russia to end Russian leader
Vladimir Putin's three-year assault on Ukraine.
CNNS Jeff Zeleny is traveling with President Trump, he's in
Florida. Jeff, what exactly did President
Trump just say? Well, Jake, the president is
signing a couple of executive orders and really having his
afternoon session with reporters at Mar a Lago.
But taking the side once again of Vladimir Putin, as we've seen
really over the last week or so, but in striking new language,
seeming to blame Vladimir Zelinsky, the Ukrainian
president, for the war. Let's listen.
And I think I have the power to end this war.
And I think it's going very well.
But today I heard, oh, well, we weren't invited.
Well, you've been there for three years.
You should have ended it three years.
You should have never started it.
You could have made a deal. That's all they played.
It cuts back. And he was like, then he repeats
back the words. Meanwhile, you've got breathless
coverage by NBC News talking about how Zelensky hits back at
Donald Trump's comments and says Ukraine is not for sale.
Really. Since when?
When is that started? Is that a new policy that you
guys have now? It's suddenly not for sale after
several, what, several $100 billion?
The best for the CNN piece for me is, is the way that they
actually they they characterize the most hostile statements yet
an apparent bid in the process of pushing Zelensky aside,
making deals using Vladimir Putin's talking points.
I kid you not. That's out of an analytical
piece, according to to the CNN. And they wonder why they've lost
all the credibility. Maybe it's because they don't
actually respect their readers. Again, this entitlement where
they think that they can tell you what your opinion is and
you're going to walk away with it.
And nobody says it better than Jennifer Rubin.
She's a 60 something year old pundit who just left the
Washington Post. She was working there and she
was recorded. And I just saw this clip running
across, so I found a way to share it with you.
Apparently, none of you can read what's on my screen.
Most of you are MAGA people. I understand that you guys know
I'm not like a MAGA guy per SE, but I'm enjoying what Donald
Trump's been doing. I've got something I'm going to
push back on in just a minute here because I don't think
everything he does is great. I think some of the things he
does are not great. And you'll hear it in just a
second. But here she is.
Jennifer Rubin again, Washington Post cut from that same cloth of
like analysis equals my opinion should be your opinion.
This is the opposite of way that America was raised.
I was never told that somebody else's opinion has to be mine.
You don't have to have your opinion and you don't have to
share mine. You don't even have to believe
that entitlement is the problem with airlines and illegal aliens
and Washington Post reporters or writers or whatever.
You don't have to believe that. You should take it and consider
it and say, well, does it make sense?
And if you say no, that's OK too.
I'm not mad at you. You shouldn't be mad at me for
having it. I'm not mad at her for thinking
that people who are MAGA folks can't read.
But it does make me wonder, why do they have chyron's on the
bottom of the Fox News articles or the Fox News pieces?
It seems like that is that might be a waste of time and effort.
Why would ABC Disney, the mouse, who has more money than God,
settle with Donald Trump? I honestly don't know.
You know, I've asked why would ABC, but people ask me all the
time, why is the media so lamsey, pamsey?
And there are two explanations. The one is they are convinced
that if they would just move a little bit to the right, all
those MAGA readers out there now, you'll notice the
contradiction in terms. MAGA readers would pick up the
Washington Post and they would have more readers.
What is the logical fallacy here?
Yes, reader. And there is nothing that the
Washington Post could possibly do that would have those people
take out a subscription. But they're convinced they're
they're in there someplace. Right, because none of you can
read. They don't Do they even hear
themselves? She you guys are phoning in on
the same thing. This is why I love my our live
chat. If you guys have never joined us
over on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin, the live chat is where
my most amusing little comments come in.
Like during the actual moment you guys are saying the same
things. I'm thinking her voice like
nails on a chalkboard. 100% that.
What happened to her arm? Why is her arm broken?
I assume because she's got like osteoporosis and she just has
like weak bones. She probably has poor genetics.
She probably doesn't take care of herself.
She doesn't seem to she's, you know, maybe weakened by
bitterness and hate. All of these things are, are are
questions that I might have. She felt like she was entitled
to be able to lift a box that she couldn't, I don't know,
maybe she tried to open a pickle jar.
She doesn't have a man in her life.
Whatever, whatever the issues are, I'm seeing some of these
funny little moments where it's just like, it's awful and
nobody, you're going to just defame and say that these people
are not good enough. This is why they've lost their
credibility and they don't even realize it.
They think they are entitled to your attention, that you need to
listen to their opinions. They don't give any evidence of
it. And then you have crazy stuff
like this. This is another one from CNN
because this is pretty funny. A group that defended
undocumented migrants cuts dozens of attorneys and staff
because apparently the United States government is not now
going to pay for it. They talk about how a guy was
beginning his his beef slaughterhouse job in rural
Tennessee when ICE showed up with guns drawn and ordered him
to toss the tools on the ground. He was 60 at the time of the
raid. He explained that his that he
had legal status to work in the United States, but the agents
zip tied him anyway. He and 100 other Latino agents
or sorry workers were shuttled off to a nearby National Guard
Armory. And this was one of the largest
workplace raids that have been sending a signal that then
Donald Trump's tough talk on immigration would actually have
hard node. Actually that happened in 2018.
So now we're going to go back to the old one.
And there was an Alabama based organization that had a team of
lawyers that was going to go out there.
They were funded apparently by the Southern Poverty Law Center,
which apparently has been getting government funding as
well. And now suddenly they're just
not going to waste their time on it.
But these people who are illegals think that they are
entitled to be defended by United States dollars, by people
who live in the US. This might be the funniest story
of the day. It comes from ABC.
This is what I feel like people voted for.
And there's a sense of entitlement that is pervasive
here as well. Three migrants beat the Trump
administration in court. They got deported the next day.
Listen, if you're going to play in the game of the United States
court systems, then words have meanings.
And what these people did, this is illegal aliens that were
inside the United States. They are being held in custody
for over a year, facing the possibility of being transferred
to the Guantanamo Bay specifically because the the
government was arguing that they were from Transda, Transda Agua.
So this Venezuelan gang, they said no, I'm sure they're being
totally honest, like, I don't know, but it doesn't really
matter because you're not even here legally.
Then they claimed that this person, these guys didn't have
any criminal offenses, and the ones that were criminal were
nonviolent. So what the best thing is this
the future look bright because last week in an immigration
custody battle for over a year, facing the possibility of
transferred to Guantanamo, three men asked a federal judge and a
federal court to intervene entitlement and they thought
that they might be disappeared into the legal black hole of
Guantanamo Bay. The federal judge in New Mexico
handed down a surprising ruling blocking the Trump
administration from sending said men to Guantanamo.
Their first successful legal challenge to the policy since it
was enacted last month is a very, very recent thing that the
Trump administration has decided you might send people to
Guantanamo the very next day. Those men were placed on the 1st
deportation flight back to Venezuela in over a year, said
their lawyer. It's hard to imagine that it
didn't have something to do with them filing a habeas peace and
then stepping forward to challenge the threats to
Guantanamo. So they got a favorable ruling.
You can't send them to Guantanamo.
But they didn't say you can't deport them.
So they just sent them the hell out of the United States.
You are not entitled to hang out here in my country.
Sorry. How funny is that?
And you go, well, but what? But what about No, the law, The
law said what it was The, the court came down and said, you
just can't go to Guantanamo. And they said, fine, we're going
to send you back to Venezuela. Go back to Caracas.
Done. Adios.
Now those people are in danger. You know how they wouldn't be in
danger if they stayed in their own damn country in the 1st
place And they didn't break US immigration laws.
That's why they got deported. It's not like there's just like
a law that's just so they're grabbing people off the street.
Are any of you in danger of being grabbed off the streets by
government vans and deported to Venezuela?
No, because you're not from Venezuela, because you're from
here. How about this?
You want evidence it works. It's right here.
This one's this. Like, it seems like these people
are actually making arguments in favor of the things that I want.
This is also from ABC. So ABC crying about someone
getting deported because they didn't have to go to Guantanamo,
they have to go to Caracas. Now you've got apprehensions
along the southwest border plummeted in January.
I wonder why the hell that would be.
Why would it be that suddenly people don't want to come to the
United States? Why are they not sneaking into
this country in the same levels they were before?
Maybe because we haven't rolled out the welcome mat and showed
them this entitled attitude of saying, hey, we're going to put
you up in luxury hotels. We're going to give you all the
things. We're going to give you money.
We're going to give you healthcare.
We're going to give you abortions.
We're going to give you transgender surgeries.
All the crap that we've been hearing about the last four
years. Very, very simple.
Apprehensions are down. You've ruined the gravy train of
people being able to access so-called entitlements and
they've done what people do, which is make a sensible
decision not to come to the United States.
Good. Please stop.
Apprehensions along the Southwest border plummeted by a
third during January, according to statistics obtained by ABC
News yesterday, there were 61,465 apprehensions.
That's CB. I'm sorry, that's a custom,
Border Patrol custom and Border Protection rather so CBP.
And that was down from January where it was 96,000.
People basically saw the door closing.
He went from 96,000 to 61 1/2 thousand.
The numbers fell even more after Donald Trump's inauguration
according to the data. So on a week to week basis,
there was an average of 2000 prior to the to the
inauguration. The daily average dropped under
1000 to 786 after the inauguration.
That's a massive drop from 2000 to 786 that 786, right?
Jeez Louise, still 176,000 along the southwest border in January
of 2024. So you had close to 200,000 a
year ago and it's just dropping and dropping because you are
removing the lure, the the ability to access these quote,
quote UN quote entitled positions.
They're going away. Let's continue to talk about a
little bit of entitlement. It's kind of interesting.
How about these ones, prison guards?
They're on strike. Who do you root for, by the way?
When Kathy Hochul, who's maybe one of the worst governors when
it comes to like a record about freedom, when we're talking
about someone who just hates American Civil Liberties, you're
talking about the governor of New York.
Who do you root for in a government?
Workers versus a government. This is kind of like a doge
thing. They're like, hey, we don't want
to negotiate with you. I, I hate strikes of government
workers. This is not, you know, the 19
teens. We are not dealing with a world
where there's workplace safety issues in the same way.
There's all kinds of regulations, probably too many
regulations. The world is safer.
The ability to share information is safer.
The power, you know, imbalance, it leans towards this soft,
favorable, entitled view towards people with their jobs.
I don't know, I'm kind of on Kathy Hochul's side of this one.
Like, I just because I just don't care.
Prison guards at the state level, in my experience, they're
not all corrupt by, by the way, like this is not a universal
statement, but there is a massive amount of corruption
that happens because you've put people in a terrible job.
The thing is this, you don't have to work that job.
And that's the thing that I don't understand this entitled
attitude that my job has to fit what I want it to be.
It has to pay me better. And that this is one of the wild
things they want. They want more access to be able
to put people in solitary confinement.
They don't like prison reforms, but I don't know enough to
decide whether that's true. But talking to people who've
been in solitary confinement, like folks that I have a new
found empathy for after January 6th and some of the ways that
they've gone after them. My friend Alfredo Luna listening
to Stewart Rhodes over this weekend, listening to people who
got thrown in solitary, It's pretty awful.
It's a pretty terrible thing to remove people from other human
beings and let them just sit in their mind.
People go crazy and that's what these state corrections officers
are are they're they're demanding higher pay, stricter
security checks. I think that's fine.
Rollbacks for prison reforms, including limits on solitary
confinements. They want to be able to do more
of it. It's hard to do that.
It's hard to feel good about that situation.
Some of this fine. But if you don't like your job,
go find another flipping job. And this is the same state as
you guys accurately pointed out in the chat that has Dexter
Taylor in in prison. You've taken a guy out who said
he was not allowed to bring up the Second Amendment in his
trial about guns because of a New York judge.
So you're not exactly the good guys on either side.
Anyway. There is a sense of entitlement
that my job must fit what I want.
And I guess that's the thing that makes me laugh most about
these guys on the left. Let's play a couple little fun
things. How about women have no rights?
This is This is why the arguments don't work, because
they don't actually have arguments.
They just have this feeling that like, whatever I want is what
should happen. Here's Owen Schroyer, as
promised. I'm not trying to grow his beard
out. I'm just trying to be me.
But Owen Schroyer makes me laugh, and he's talking to what
looks like a legit Midget. I don't know why this woman is
wearing like a Toadstool thing, but she looks like one of the
people from the Super Mario World, and apparently she has no
rights. She wants to be able to kill
babies. She says it the quiet part out
loud in this one too. Is this a gay pride event?
It's. A humanity event.
A humanity event who doesn't have rights?
Who doesn't? Yeah, I don't as a woman.
You don't. What rights don't you have?
I don't have the right to kill a person that I'm growing inside
my. Body.
That's true. You don't have the right to kill
a person, that's true. Don't you have?
I have the exact same rights you have.
No, you have more. Well, I can't.
I can't I. You know why you think you have
more? No, I don't think I have more.
You think I have more? Oh no, you have more.
So explain that. Explain history to you, your
founding fathers. What year is it?
Exactly. It's 2025, we still haven't
broken and we're not doing it anymore.
Curses. What curses am I cursed?
That the white men have put on us.
The white man put a curse on you.
White people don't exist. Your existence is based on
genocide. That's why you're here trying to
find answers, because you have no culture and so you.
Robbed us. Of our.
Culture really. Like can I get a mushroom to
wear on my head? Absolutely.
You know where I got it from? One of your corporations.
I don't know what the hell is going on there, by the way.
She found a step to stand on, so she was tall enough to talk to
him so he didn't have to point the microphone down at a 45°
angle. Yeah, you can't kill a kid.
We we all agree on that. The fact that she said it that
way let's, you know, kind of how it works, right?
Speaking of kids, I told you I was going to some things you
guys don't like. You're not entitled to in vitro,
and I don't know why the federal government would have to get
involved in it. Donald Trump the other day
signed an executive order on expanding access to in vitro
fertilization. There's a lot of reasons why
this is problematic. The biggest one on a moral and
ethical issue is that we're talking about creating human
life, putting together and creating embryos and then a
bunch of them get destroyed. That's the biggest argument
against it. But let's just do it at a level
where, why in the hell should the federal government get
involved in this? You are not entitled to have the
government, the federal government, the largest
organization, the the biggest employer in the world right now
as far as I'm aware, come in and push the heavy hand.
The worst solution to like your individual problem.
You're not entitled to have children.
It turns out this is the other thing, like for all of human
history, people understood that whether they believed in a God
or God's plural, whatever it was that their understanding of the
supernatural was, you didn't have the ability to necessarily
screw with that. And if you can afford it, great.
But like, there's a lot of things that people don't have
that they would like. Some of them are children.
Some people who would be great parents, I think, don't have
children. You're not entitled to a spouse.
That's the old joke. If you were in the military,
they said if they, the Army or the Air Force or the Navy wanted
you to have a, a spouse, they would issue you one, right?
That's the joke that like, let's expand that out like you're just
if you, if they wanted you to have children, wouldn't you be
issued one? If God wanted you to have
children, wouldn't you have them?
Does it mean that I'm mad at you if you were conceived by IVF?
No, I'm not mad at you. I'm not mad at anybody for it.
I'm just saying that Donald Trump as the president of the
United States need not get involved.
Daily Wire does a pretty good job talking about it.
There are plenty of people that find it to be problematic.
The fact that it cost $15,000. The, the major issue with IVFI
think is that it opens up all kinds of really unusual and non
conducive and, and, and specifically non child focused
families to having kids, people who can't otherwise biologically
make it happen. It's tough, OK, it's tough.
I understand that. I don't want that for you.
I'm I, you know, there are plenty of examples throughout
the Bible of talking about children being a blessing.
We're dealing with the society that says otherwise.
So so pushes against that society.
There's a nuance there, for sure.
Federal government is not involved in your medical
decisions that way. And that seems terrible.
It seems like a really awful use of our money, seems like a
really awful use of the executive power.
And at the end of the day, I don't know what it's actually
going to bring out. Now, that's a Catholic position,
no doubt about it. It's generally a Christian
position. Let me push back against some of
those people as well. Here's my people saying
something that makes me pissed off.
And it's also about entitlement. Again, if you feel entitled to
IVF from the federal government, you got a problem.
Like, I disagree with you. So let's hash that out.
Feel free to put it in the comments.
How about this nonsense? This is coming from The
Washington Times, the United States Catholic Bishops
Association, these guys, when they get together. the US
Conference of Catholic Bishops have sued the Trump
administration asking for a federal judge to order the State
Department to restart giving taxpayer money.
Gosh, talk about entitlement that the bishops say they need
in order to help refugees who don't have a right to be here.
OK, so let's get to how how entitled does it get Your
religious group, my religious group, these are these are the
leaders of my church. The Catholic Bishops are saying
that the State Department must give them back money to help the
people that came to the United States illegally that they are
referring to as refugees because they have Co opted that name
because they're not refugees, not in a in a traditional
status. They should have stopped in the
first country. They're not asylum seekers
because there's not an asylum law that would justify them.
It is tough. It's not appropriate.
The Bishop said that they are. They were giving assistance to
6700 refugees. And Donald Trump shut off the
government spigot. Yes, as is his right as the
chief executive. Deal with it to deal with it.
I'm just seeing this. Look at I told you guys you were
going to be pissy about this. I don't care about your opinion
on this. I don't agree with you.
IVF is a net bad. The fact that you think that
there are some goods out of it. Exceptions don't prove the rule.
The rule is it allows people that shouldn't have it.
This will always be the case. I look forward to seeing you
guys over on the on the X platform or if you guys want to
do it in the comments under Neon Rumble, let's play.
But the fact of the matter is there are plenty of things the
federal government need not get involved in.
IVF is one of them, and supporting migrants through a
Catholic charity is another one. The church has a lot of money.
If people want to put their money into it through private
charities, I absolutely agree with that.
If that's what the Catholic Church or your parish wants to
do or your pastor thinks that this is a a priority, let them
spend your money very, very close to you.
Stop making it come to the federal government of my tax
dollars. It's not good.
So again, we have to take shots at everything.
Let's do the last one. Speaking of shots, how about
RFKRFK Junior is telling his staff that he will investigate
the childhood vaccine schedule, anti depression drugs, all the
things that we were hoping would happen.
This is another thing that should happen because the
federal government does push a pretty heavy hand down and it
has raised a lot of questions. They delegitimized the strength
of the institutions like the CDC and others.
And so now you're seeing people feel like this is the sky is
falling. My favorite is that it this is
from ABC News. Again, numerous studies show no
link between childhood vaccine schedule and autism.
And yet was it properly studied by people who actually didn't
have a vested interest? I just want to know because we
have an opportunity right now and it's a new opportunity.
We have places like Joe Rogan's podcast.
You've got people coming out suddenly after a lot of us have
been talking and here's the vice president, United States.
A lot of us have pushed back on Donald Trump statements about
Operation War speed and his his father of the vaccine and all
this other kind of crap, which was not a good take and
definitely could have lost him some votes in November.
From the people that are very conservative, not necessarily
people who are Republican, but the conservative types like me
that are like, man, you have to have a net positive set of good
takes and you've had some bad ones.
It's nice to know that the number 2 JD Vance is saying
things like this, which I think are eminently reasonable.
I'm not mad at anybody who got the vaccine shots, but if you
think that you should force anybody else and you don't have
any questions about it, what the hell are you reading?
This is an an obvious example that apparently MAGA people like
JD Vance actually do read Washington Post lady Enjoy.
This and I, I mean, you know, I, so I, I, I took, I took the vax
and you know, I haven't been boosted or anything, but the,
the moment where I really started to get red pilled on the
whole vax thing was the sickest that I've been in the last 15
years by far was when I took the vaccine.
And I, you know, I've had Covic at this point five times.
I was in bed for two days. My heart was racing.
I was like the, the, the fact that we're not even allowed to
talk about that even, you know, no, no, like serious injury.
But but even the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about
the fact that I was as sick as I've ever been for two days and
the worst COVID experience I had was like a sinus infection.
I'm not really willing to trade that.
And you don't even, you know, everybody that I know or a lot
of people I know, they talk about the second shot that they
got of the vaccine was really that made them really, really
sick. Well, that's a side effect and
not a side effect that we even talk about enough in this
country. No, it's and it's also again.
We're talking about companies that have a long history of
lying and being forced to pay criminal fines, and then we're
giving them this exemption from being responsible for any of the
side effects. Right.
An entitlement to be able to take your money and not have any
consequences. All these things, this
entitlement sort of like theme. It's really bothering me.
And it might be the rest of the week that we talk about it.
Tomorrow we're going to talk a little bit about that plane
crash that happened in Toronto because I want to get into that.
I got a couple other things that we could get into.
Apparently they want to blame Donald Trump for inflation
still. So all the things, this
entitlement that now that your guys in, we want to see you,
you, we want to hold you to your own standard.
But when the the standards on, you know, when the the other
team has got the ball, as Stuart Rhodes said over on our Sunday
conversation, we don't ever want to see the standards applied to
them. Very weird time to be alive.
And if we're not debunking the stuff and asking the questions
about what's going on, then we're going to get screwed up.
OK, I do have a another video that we're going to end with as
as sort of our palate cleanse for the day.
And it is an entitlement thing. You guys will laugh, but we're
going to talk about my friends, the snow Mexicans who are up on
the north side up in America's attic, also known as Canadians.
Why they're called Canadians is unknown to me.
Snow Mexicans is getting getting some steam behind it.
So make sure you're using that term.
Let me remind you again, you want to support the channel.
If you don't have to do it financially, you can simply do
it by sharing it with a friend. We're on X, we're on YouTube,
we're on Rumble and all those. You can share it by going to
kyleserafinshow.com. Very, very simple website and
that will redirect you to Spotify.
Spotify is free for my show. It's free, there's no ads on it.
So if you'll share it with a friend or two, I'd very much
appreciate it. We can grow the numbers there,
which is great. It gives us an opportunity to
continue doing the thing we're doing and reach a bigger
audience. But it doesn't cost you
anything. So if anybody might benefit from
some of the stuff, and if you're hearing things here, you don't
hear other places, share it. Let people know like, hey, come
listen, challenge your mind. Don't feel entitled to being
safe and smug and thinking that you know all the things.
I don't either. That's why I engage on X the way
that I do. So we really appreciate that
people who are smug and safe and living in maybe the most
entitled position in any government in the world, our
friends the snow Mexicans. So here is our way out the door
with a comedian who I really love.
I love Daniel Tosh, he always made me laugh.
He reminds me of my younger brother for some reason.
Canada has the greatest fence ever built.
America. It is foolproof if you can
afford it. Really easy to be the cool open
minded hippie country when there's a Kevlar snuggie of
America draped around your fat frozen asses.
Dare in the world to talk shit. We don't use our military.
We know we got you taken care of.
Go back to bed, we'll wake you in the NHL.
Playoff start Canada has. Yep, Canada does have it pretty
easy. So congratulations and you're
welcome. Snow Mexicans, we'll keep you
safe. You can be smug and hippy and
cool. God bless the rest of you who
are out there, my American friends.
Thanks for listening and we'll see you again tomorrow.
Have a great day. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Seraphin Show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Seraphin Bobble Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at
Kyle Seraphin.