Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower in
American Patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth, because this programme has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Serif down. Yeah, hello.
Welcome, my friends, to the Kyle Serafin Show.
Today is Wednesday, December the 20th.
It's weird. Wednesday, we got some weird
stuff for you. I promise.
I promise we'll get weird. And let's talk about what we've
got coming up. We've got a Florida deputy who
was just absolved of wrongdoing. There's a reason why it's an
old, old, old ruling, and the idea that he would be
accountable is kind of silly. So we'll cover that.
We're going to talk about lawsuits against the president.
Of course, it'd be foolish not to.
Former president being removed from the ballot from Colorado.
Is that true? We'll discuss, I promise.
And let's see Proud Boys going to gaol.
That seems like with something worth talking about.
Let's start things off just a little differently than normal.
I'm wearing a red shirt, A red shirt of Rage Against the
MACHINE Against the evil that goes on in our federal
government. And we're going to promote My
Friend Gargoyles website. So let's do that.
First, The Oil Family Sweatshop. The Dash.
Suspend tables.com. You can use the promo code Kyle,
which will save you 10% on any of the outstanding merch items
supporting the sustentables. Let me tell you again, we were
running that same promo where you literally type in Kyle as
the promo code and you can get three of these guys, three of
the lapel pins, which are an outstanding little stocking
stuffer. They're great for Christmas
parties. They're great for handing out to
your friends, letting them know and and lest you be like our
friend Carlos who was on Infowars the other day, and he
was wearing it upside down, he was wearing it like this.
All right, that's upside down. This is right side up.
The eagle is down. Same way I handed this Dan
Bongino when we were at Miralago.
I said, hey, the Eagles down. And he's like, copy that, Eagle
is down. That's how you wear the
sustentables merch pins, as you guys see on my shirt every day.
This is how we do it. So check out the That's just
bendables.com. The dash expendables.com.
Probably too late to get your Christmas order in unless you're
just doing the pins. So those things can probably fly
out the door. I'm going to be pushing the
envelope on on Garrett to get those out to you.
And then you can always have it for your New Year's party, which
will look fantastic. Bringing in the new year,
letting people know you're ready to do the right thing, whatever
the cost. There's some people in this
world that are not willing to do that.
Some of the people that are also willing to do that are my
friends over at Catholic Vote. You guys know who's what's going
on right now. We've got the Catholic prom king
election going on catholicvote.org.
It's catholicvote.org, the leading Catholic organisation of
lay Catholic people not associated with the Catholic
Church. Just people who happen to be
Catholic, that believe in faith and family and freedom.
And that's what they're all about.
You guys should sign up for the loop and you should also check
in on the Catholic Tournament of Heroes, or whatever the heck
they're calling it. 2023. It's me and Mark Howe.
He just said may the best man win.
I just said I voted for Mark. Hope you guys, you know how to
do this. You can follow me on Twitter.
It's under donate dot catholicvote.org/something 2023
Heroes. We'll put the link in the
description again. Once again, we've already maxed
out our vote for Mark Hall, but you guys can go there and punch
that in. I'd appreciate it if you did.
Like I said, my my vote is marked out.
The guy faced much more serious. Much more serious consequences
for what he did. He was facing gaol time.
My family just got displaced. So not to belittle anybody's
story, including my own, but Mark, how's my guy?
I think you guys should check out catholicvote.org.
Go ahead and put your vote in there and sign up for the loop
while you're at it. All worth your time.
Let's get ready to rock'n'roll. Let's rumble.
We are here live on rumble.com/kyle Sarah, and if
you are joining us in the chat, please give us a thumbs up, give
us a little bit of a like. We appreciate those.
It moves the videos up and today's story leading right off
the charge is going to be the story of Scott Peterson.
You guys know Scott Peterson? Do you remember this guy?
Speaking of heroes, there's a good picture of him sort of
crying because he was held. He was found to be sort of
innocent of the requirement to defend children.
It's kind of like what you think you're supposed to do when
you're a man. I'm gonna read this story here,
which is coming from CBS News local news in Miami, FL deputies
legal team said he didn't have an obligation to start the
Parkland Shooter. Like it or not, that's true.
And that's what the courts just found.
A former sheriff's deputy. It's claiming he had no legal
obligation to confront the gunman who murdered 17 people,
wounded seventeen others at Parklands Marjory Stoneman
Douglas High School nearly six years ago.
That's what his attorney argued on Monday.
The legal team representing the Broward County deputy Scott
Peterson. There's the name now.
You guys know, asked a judge to dismiss the lawsuit brought by
the victims, families and survivors, even though decision
would likely be derided by the public.
And here's what's really important.
Just because the public thinks something doesn't mean that
that's the way it's supposed to go.
If it was because the way the public thought was what we were
supposed to do, then you would be dealing with the democracy,
which Democrats continue to tell us that we live in.
But we know better than that here at the Kyle Serafin Show.
And our audience, all of you Sarah fans, God, it's hard to
say that all you Sarah fans know it's not about what the will of
the public is. It's about rule of law and is
about what the supreme majority is.
That's going to be the Super majorities that are listed in
our Constitution and that's why this lawsuit was in fact
dismissed. Attorney Michael Piper told the
Circuit Court Judge Carol Lisa Phillips that under the law his
client cannot be sued for anything he did or didn't do.
On February the 14th, 2018 on that massacre at the high school
east side of the appellate court cases that say the police
officers don't have a legal obligation to protect others
from third party harm and cannot be sued for decisions they make
during a crisis. You guys will remember this was
when a 25 year old former student went in and murdered and
attempted to murder something like 30-4 people. 17 he actually
killed. The The argument being made is
that there's a legal difference between a legal duty and what we
would call societal expectations.
Now yes, there is an expectation that men with guns will go do
their job and protect kids and women.
That's the values that we have in Western society.
But that is not a legal duty to act and we're going to get a
little bit deeper into that for you.
The appeals court of Washington, DC settled this case when I was
born. It actually was decided a couple
of days before I was born in 1981, all right.
And the the case was called Warren versus DC.
It is an appeals court. It was against the District of
Columbia Metro Police Department, which is not a good
Police Department as we've talked about.
I don't know if it was better in the 1980s.
My suspicion is no, but essentially this particular
court found that there was no specific duty to act.
That the that the individual police officers did not owe an
individual duty to the people that sued.
And this included Carol, Warren, Miriam, Douglas, and Joan.
I'm going to butcher the last name, but Taliaferro, all right.
There was a a neighbour who was involved in doing some really
nefarious, awful things. And when he so the police were
unable to respond at a speed that the, the, the the suing
parties felt was appropriate. And the court said that's not
really what the police do. The police are not required.
They don't have a duty to any individuals to protect them from
harm. It's just not the way that our
system works. They own no specific duties.
Even though we have a general idea that there is a public
duty, there's a public duty of the police to protect, that
actually only applies to the public, not to the individual.
So what does that actually mean? It means that if you have
something bad happening to you, the police could make an
appropriate decision to just cordon off the area and let you
and your family be killed. And they would keep those bad
guys inside the house, killing you and your families, but
they're not going to affect the rest of the public.
And that would be a lawful decision that may come as a
shock to some of you. There's a reason why we always
tell you on this show, and many other people that are in the
conservative space are saying be your own first responder.
Why would you want to do that? You'd want to do that because
the police do not owe you a specific duty to help.
And this court case goes back, like I said, at least 42 years.
Right now that's what we're seeing.
It's 42 years of it being pretty well established that the police
officers don't have to come to save you.
And if that's a surprise to you, let it be this Christmas season.
Let that be the gift to you that you decide to go towards self
reliance and not based on dependence on the government.
I keep seeing people tag things that in fact we're actually
going to play a video that came from Libs of TikTok later on in
the show. And the the question is this,
you cannot simultaneously say defund the police or defund.
I think more more likely federal law enforcement defund the FBI.
You can't be in the defund the FBI camp and at the same time
say shouldn't the FBI have this person on a watch list?
And if you guys will permit me, I'd like to share kind of a
quick little personal story about this.
I got a phone call from Fox News.
I got a phone call from Jesse Watters Show.
This was going back a couple of weeks ago, sometime in probably
October, right about the time when the Hamas attack happened.
And they said, we'd really like to have you on the show to talk
about all of these leftist professors at these prestigious
universities like Harvard, which we covered down on what kind of
people are running Harvard. They were actually gonna talk a
little bit about hard stuff later on in the show today.
And. And they said, can you come on
and talk about how the FBI is actually investigating Catholics
at school boards and sorry, Catholics that church and and
parents at school board meetings and so on.
They're they're wasting those resources when they should be
investigating terrorist supporters like a professor at
an Ivy League school. And that, you know, made me kind
of stop and go I I don't think you're talking to the right guy.
Do you know who you are called You just called Kyle Serafin.
I don't think the FBI should be investigating anybody for speech
not Douglas Mackie like we interviewed yesterday.
And if you missed that, you definitely missed out on a long
form I think expose of who he is as a person.
You don't have to love him or love his memes or anything else
to know that you actually do have a right to say things that
are unpleasant in this country. That's the position that I have
always held. That's what I thought I was
raising my hand and swearing to. And even though I think that I
have a personal duty to act, I don't have a legal duty to act
as the law enforcement officer to go and save individual
people. That's just not what it's about.
And so when you ask me, hey, would you tell me about how the
FBI should be investigating professors at some fancy school
because of what they said? The answer is no, I will not be
doing that. So I appreciate the opportunity.
I think you got the wrong guy. So that's what happens, by the
way, once you turn down a Fox News, Hey, can you be here and
you tell them no for ideological reasons?
Because what you're saying is not aligned with the values that
I actually am trying to share with people.
That's usually the last time that they end up calling you.
So don't expect me on Fox News anytime anytime sooner.
However, it was the right decision.
It continues to be the right decision and we don't have to be
happy about this man. Scott Peterson as a man to know
that the court still came up with the right decision, which
is that there is no individual duty to act.
Self reliance is the American virtue.
It's the quintessential American virtue.
It's taken upon yourself. It's the the crown is coming
down and imposing taxes on you. Don't wait for anybody else to
act. Everyone keeps waiting for
someone else to act in this country right now.
I think that's what the the message of the Boston Tea Party
should be. And we just came up on the 250th
anniversary of that particular day.
Throwing tea in the harbour was an act of rebellion saying that
we no longer are gonna take your crap.
But it wasn't a government action.
It was people that decided to individually act if we could
bring up the next court case over here too the this was
actually settled in the Supreme Court in a very similar way and
interestingly enough it relates to the way that Donald Trump's
case was going because they decided that using an argument
under the 14th Amendment this is Deshaney versus Winnebago.
Goes back to 1989. Again, long standing tradition
holds that and long standing case law rules that individual
members of the state do not owe an an individual duty they as
part of an agency. So a collective duty to the
public and the public in air quotes is everyone but not
anyone. Does that make sense?
It's everyone in the public, but individuals can be carved off
that public as long as they are basically doing the greater
good. That may involve protecting
police officers, protecting their own lives, not running in.
And in this particular case, Deshaney versus Winnebago was
about social workers who were sued because they did not come
to the aid of a child who was brutally beaten and permanently
disfigured by his father, which is awful.
It's a truly awful thing. And I actually think that the
worst part of this is because the the kid doesn't really have
any ability, doesn't have any agency to do it.
But the individual police officers that responded and the
individual social workers that were involved, we're unable to
be held accountable because that's not the way that our
society is organised. It's public versus individual.
And the minute that you know that, it will change the way
that you look at police officers who are doing the best they can
with what they've got, but there's a limited number of
police officers they have to prioritise the threat and you
may not be a priority. So the only way that you deal
with that is, quite simply, you decide to become your own first
responder. You decide to be responsible,
like an American, for your own freedom, your own liberty, your
own civil liberties, and you don't give any ground to the
government, and you don't expect the government to come save you.
The minute that you expect the government to come save you is
the minute that you might as well start voting for the people
on the political left, because that's what they want.
That's what democracy is about. That's not what a constitutional
Republic that has some democratic principles is about.
It's pretty straightforward stuff.
Speaking of self reliance, Speaking of do-it-yourself,
Speaking of making sure that you can protect yourself and you
solve your own problems, how about you solve the problem if
you happen to have a food shortage?
If things get shady in this country, and they definitely
might in the next 12 months, I think we would be foolish not to
think that we saw craziness happen in 2020.
This could get easily as crazy. So go to fourpatriots.com/kyle,
the number four patriots.com/kyle and get
yourself prepared. All you got to do is put some
money down up front to make sure that you hedge against future
disasters. That's gonna take you to our
landing page right here, where it says emergency preparedness
deals. What are emergency preparedness
deals? Those are deals that prepare you
for the emergencies. What kind of emergencies might
you face? You might be without food.
You can solve that. You might be without water.
You could buy a filtration device.
You might be without power. You can buy some solutions for
that, whether it be a small little solar panel that's going
to charge up your phones for calms.
I'm always getting on my. I just got on my wife about this
because we have a charger in our minivan and the charger no
longer works. And it's like that's not a
charger anymore. That's just wire.
That's in my way when I'm driving.
So you can solve these problems by going and getting like a
power cell, like you're seeing here on the screen.
You can get yourself a solar generator which will be able to
power some of your devices, probably like your refrigerator,
the most important things, maybe some of the lights.
You can move around accurately and load your magazines if you
can't do it in the dark. Actually, I saw George Hill send
me a picture the other day. He was cleaning his shotgun, I
believe was a combat shotgun by candlelight, just to practise,
because that's the kind of people that I'm friends with.
You all, If you are not doing that sort of thing, make sure
you get yourself hedged against chaos, against sort of danger,
and make sure that you are not waiting on the state and bring
you food or water or warmth or light.
Go to fourpatriots.com/kyle. That's how you do it.
That looks nice. I don't know what a sauna
blanket looks like. I've seen those like in some of
the I went to a libertarian conference where a bunch of
people sitting in, it's like pop-up sauna and that's the
thing. I don't know why, but alright,
Yeah. And I just saw in the the chat
someone just said go George. Yeah, George literally sends me
pictures of stuff like that. He was like, hey, I'm walking in
my plate carrier today. When you carry your plate
carrier, you should also carry a gun.
So no one takes your plate carrier and he looks like a
psycho. He looks like a bald, you know,
man who is retired carrying a rifle with a play carrier,
marching around in New Hampshire and God bless him for it, you
know, if you guys aren't practising things in low light
or no light or candlelight, what are you doing?
You're not doing, you're not doing the George routine.
So I do appreciate him doing that kind of stuff.
Let's keep pressing on because there's some other bad news
here. Not so much bad because of what
happened, but bad because of the way that it compares.
And I want to bring up the story.
CNN was breathlessly reporting yesterday that one of the
cooperators in the Proud Boys trial that helped put the other
guys away was just sentenced, got a reduced sentence.
And that sentence was 40 months. In my mind whenever you tell me
somebody got sentenced. And then we compared against
someone like a Charles Mcgonagall, former FBI agent
with the highest security clearance and one of the most
sensitive jobs in the United States government for the Intel
world. And that guy got a similar
sentence. It makes me want to puke it it
it makes me sickened. But what I don't see is when
that happens, I don't look and say all of the courts are
garbage and nothing just can happen.
I'll tell you why that is in a second.
But let's read this article out here.
It's this former Proud Boys leader turned cooperator gets
reduced sentence in January 6 case.
This is a 2 minute read. There you go.
The former Proud Boys Lieutenant.
I don't like them using that word either.
I don't even think they know the word Lieutenant means
particularly somebody at CNN who has a mullet.
He was a former marine or U.S. Marine was cooperating witness.
Here it is again the far right groups leaders for conspiring to
stop Joe Biden from becoming president.
This is what we would call assuming facts not in evidence.
I know that they think they've established this.
I think these are all going to get overturned on appeal or a
significant chunk of them. He was sentenced on Tuesday to
40 months in prison. 40 That's a little over, what, 3 1/2 years?
Or it's right at 3 1/2 years rather.
Charles Donahue, 35, was the first of the Proud Boys
leadership to enter a guilty plea.
And then he assisted the prosecutors in their case, which
resulted in convictions of several the leaders in the group
for seditious conspiracy, which is just a disgusting the idea of
conspiracy we talked about yesterday.
If you guys haven't heard it, I encourage you to go back and
listen to that one. Download the audio podcast and
take it with you when you go. You can find us on Apple and on
Spotify and iHeartRadio and so on.
Anywhere that you get your podcast, you can listen to the
audio, listen to Douglas back at audio might actually be as good
as anything else. Donahoe pled guilty to two
felony charges related to the US capital back for conspiring to
obstruct the official proceeding on January 6th and assaulting an
officer by throwing 2 water bottles at police during the
riot. Can we just embrace that for a
second in this country you cannot be held liable.
For better, for worse, it is the case law for not doing anything.
While seventeen people are shot and killed, another 17 people
are injured by a gunman that is on the loose when you are an
armed law enforcement officer. But you can get 40 months in
prison for throwing 2 water bottles at police officers.
Water bottles, guys, and we're not even hearing the entire
circumstances of it. This guy has already served 38
months of his sentence. Interestingly enough, some of
you know that under the First Step Act that Donald Trump
signed into office, if you are a first time offender, usually you
only serve 50 to 60% of your federal sentence, so he's
probably already served too much time.
This is yet another sort of example of injustice that's
going on in our justice system. It's not all bad, though,
because we found that out yesterday, even though Doug
Mackey was convicted by a jury, supposedly of his peers in a
district that he didn't live in. In a district that he didn't
commit a crime in, even the appeals court took it up and was
looking at reversing it. So, you know, don't give up hope
on there. But I kind of follow into the
same kind of category. I grew up with this idea.
God helps those who help themselves.
God helps those who help themselves means that you can
pray to God and you can have faith that he will do something
to solve your problems. But you should also probably put
the oars in the water and start rolling for the shore.
That's the other version of it. Pray to God, but row for the
shore. Just because there's a storm
coming your way doesn't mean prayer is the end of it.
Don't put all your eggs in any of the baskets because you don't
know how God's help is going to come.
There's a famous parable. You guys may have heard this
about a person who experiences that flood is coming and someone
comes running by and knocks on the door and says, hey, there's
a flood coming. You need to get out of this
house. You need to evacuate.
And the person says, no, no, no. God will save me.
I'm good to go. And so the person leaves and
evacuates. The flood rider, you know, gets
up to the top step of the door, starts getting in the house a
little bit. And somebody comes by and
they're riding on a bicycle and they bang on the door and go,
hey, there's a flood coming, you gotta get out of here.
We can barely ride out on the bike.
And so the person says, no, no, no, I'm good to go.
And then the waters rise above the first level of the house and
now it's up to the second level. And the person is up in their
second room, 2nd floor, bathroom, bedroom.
And the. And somebody comes paddling by
in a canoe and knocks on the window.
Hey man, you got to get out of here.
Jump in. The person says no, no, God will
save me. I've got this.
I'm good, yeah. So the person paddles off in the
boat. And then finally the floodwaters
rise to the top of the house and the person climbs up on the roof
and is waiting there. And the helicopter flies down.
They throw rope and they say climb on up.
You know, let's get out of here. Your house is about to blow
away. And they go, no, no, God will
save me. And then the person drowns.
And then the conversation happens at the end.
I mean, at the pearly gates, it's like, hey, man, you died.
What were you doing? Well, I was waiting for God to
save me is like, who the hell do you think sent all those people?
So we pray to God. But we wrote for the shore.
In this case, like I said, hedge against contingencies just
because you believe that there is a possibility for some plus.
It doesn't happen in our time and it doesn't mean that it'll
happen in any particular court system.
So all the things need to be done at all the times.
And that's actually where we're going to get to when we start
talking about this historic new low for the Colorado Supreme
Court. I hope that makes a lot of sense
to you all. I'm quite sure it does.
Before we do something about these people who are
questionable in their patriotism, let's also throw
like a little thank you out to my buddies over at Patriot
Coolers. Let's do it real quickly.
But Patriot coolers.com. You guys know how to get there.
The promo code is Kyle. You're noticing A trend here.
If you're new to our channel, I'm pretty good about keeping it
the same. Kyle will get you 10% off at
Patriot Coolers as well if you go through any of the other
pages. By the way, somebody tagged me
on social media and they're like, hey, I saw where to enter
the promo code. I bought it through Kovacs.
That doesn't work. Then Govx gets credit.
If you want to credit our show, you just go to
patriotcoolers.com. You type in Kyle when you're
doing the checkout and you can get any number of their
fantastic products, including the 16 ounce tumbler that I use
literally every single day. And I used to carry a 30 oz with
me every single day when I was on surveillance for like 3
straight years for the FBI, it was my go to.
As I say, there are only three things you need to conduct
surveillance. You need a radio to talk to your
team. You need a cup of coffee so you
can stay awake, and you need a piss bottle.
Everything else is negotiable. Binoculars, cameras, etcetera.
You don't need all those things. But what you do need is a way to
stay awake and a way to evacuate.
And then of course, radio tell your team what's going on.
Check it out again. It's Patriot coolers.com promo
code. Kyle, Kyle.
I'm gonna take a little breather here, and I know that we had
some issues on Rumble as we were getting started.
Are you guys doing pretty good? I'm looking at the chat.
Looks like it's still rolling up and down.
Although somebody asked if I'm gay.
I don't know why that's the case but I'm not.
I don't think that doesn't seem to be my thing.
Ryan. Any indication that that's the
case? I don't think so.
Yeah. They they may change their mind
at the end of the should be. I don't know it's there's some
documented evidence against that.
We're gonna do something at the end of the show that we're gonna
show you guys something from live to tick tock that may make
you think otherwise. But well yeah it's weird
Wednesday. So that's how we roll.
Let's let's do CNN. Can't help it.
Everybody had a take on this historic new level.
Let's let's talk about the historic lows that have happened
in this country. And they won't call it all lows,
but I'm calling it a low historically.
Historically, we dealt with some really wild stuff.
This last 18 months we saw Donald Trump rated at Miralago
by the FBI. The former president of the
United States had his house taken in, even though they could
have got a consent and probably could have gotten a consent
search, they decided to execute a tactical raid at the former
president's home. It's a lovely place, by the way,
and I've been there one time and I would suggest to you that it
they probably could have just called ahead their Secret
Service. Everywhere.
They have security everywhere. It's actually guarded by our
federal government, by our tax dollars.
This would not been a hard ask. You're also talking about a guy
who used to be the top executive in this country, so called ahead
would have been the right move. Steve D'antuono, who was my old
boss, actually said as much but did not call ahead.
All right, so that's number one. They did the raid.
Then we indicted him. We being the people, because
it's the United States, the people of the United States
versus Donald Trump. And indicted him not just once
and not just twice in federal court, but also in two local
courts. They started off in New York and
they did it in Florida. Then they did it in DC Then they
did it in Georgia. Do you notice a pattern?
This is getting pretty wild. The indictments didn't work.
A search warrant at his house didn't make people say Donald
Trump is disqualified from being president.
We're not going to follow him. In fact, it might have bumped up
his support. Then they did the indictments,
and the indictments did the same thing.
People were like, oh, you don't like Donald Trump in New York
and in Georgia and in this Florida case, and this special
counsel doesn't like it in DC Yeah, we like him even more.
We don't like you. We don't like you.
Federal government and DOJ who decided to indict Douglas
Mackie, who decided to get a criminal complaint sworn out two
days after the Biden administration took power.
Right. We heard that yesterday, two
whole days, 48 hours after Joe Biden took the reins of this
country. Assuming that you believe that
he actually has any control or agency, which I'm not 100% sure
I do. My, my buddy Dan calls him the
the rotting bag of oatmeal or oatmeal.
Brains. That's what I always picture.
I actually picture a body with a rotting bag of oatmeal as the
head. That may not be what Dan is
trying to conjure up, but that's what I think of.
And that was brought up on social media yesterday.
Someone said that that is just too mean and maybe they should
censor. Dan, luckily we're on rumble
where they do not censor people. Again, rumble.com/kyle Serafin
is where we are at. You guys can give us a thumbs up
in that chat there and move us up in the rankings, but more
importantly, join us for the live chat.
People say they stay, they come for the content, they stay for
the chat, as I see many of you guys are chatting about right
now. So OK, that's the new low,
right? And those didn't work, So search
warrant didn't work, local indictment didn't work, Federal
indictment, No Bueno still rising in the polls.
What could we do? Maybe we'll throw a debate and
then he won't be there because he doesn't want to be there and
he continues to to rise Poles. He's more popular among
Republicans because essentially the people in the state that
kind of suck have decided that he's the most dangerous guy.
I always liken this to the to the to the Harry Potter analogy.
I think you guys have heard me say this before, but I'm gonna
say it anyway. I brought it up last night when
I was on Twitter. In this Twitter space, we had a
pretty good size Twitter space 2000, plus people listening.
So some of you may be hearing this again for the second time,
but the game looks something like this.
The story of Harry Potter is most interesting.
It's a human allegory that kind of explains the way a lot of
human experience, which is that when you say that which you fear
and you pick that you, you actually name your opponent.
If you remember, the story of Harry Potter was such that there
were two boys that basically fit the criteria and and the bad guy
Voldemort goes after Harry Potter specifically, he could
have gone after the other guy whose name was Clayton
Longbottom. I think that sounds right to me,
just to hold me accountable if you're a Harry Potter freak.
He fixed me in the chat here. But there were two possible boys
that could have been ordained as the real enemy of Voldemort and
he chose Harry Potter. And hence that becomes the story
because you pick the guy, he goes and tries to kill this
little baby, this baby comes back and ends up striking him
down. It's a lot like what goes on in
the story of of Star Wars, right?
Same idea. He could have picked Leah as his
enemy. It just turned out that it was
Luke Lea ended up doing something else.
You know there were two babies and and the one that got chosen
ended up being the nemesis of evil.
And in the same way and not to say that Luke's Luke Skywalker
and and Harry Potter are direct analogies to Donald Trump
because they're kind of presenting some sort of like a
salvific figures almost religious type saviours but for
this country, you they basically picked that Donald Trump is the
guy, for all of his faults and failings, for all of his
mistakes and misdeeds that have happened throughout his life,
for the fact that he was Neville Longbottom.
Thank you. I knew.
So here's here's what's really funny.
Cindy in the chat just corrected me.
Neville the bottom the reason why I said that wrong is because
a guy I grew up with is named Clayton Neville and I always put
the name and he kind of looks like the guy that played the the
actor there. He's kind of like a silly
creature. So anyway Neville Longbottom
yes. Very good very well done.
The the fact is, is that that Donald Trump, for all of his
failings and the fact that he was a Democrat for most of his
life and and actually served in many ways like a Democrat, let's
be really, really, really fair about the way that he came into
office. He spent like crazy, right?
But his policies were sort of like pretty acceptable, other
than the fact that they lost their minds that he just
basically ran with an R after his name.
So is he the the hero that we want?
Is he the hero that we need? Sounds like it.
He's the hero that we got. That's really what it comes down
to. And I don't like the word hero,
but so be it. You know what I mean?
The guy is the one that the state that the the sort of
powers that be has ordained to be the resistance of him.
Do you know how many people in federal government put the the
word #resistance? They were actually entire
Twitter accounts that were copies and duplicates of real
federal agencies with their real symbols and authorities.
They duplicated it and they called themselves like the
resistance of the Department of Interior, the resistance of the
Department of Education, and they were 100% dedicated federal
employees to working against their actual boss, who was
Donald Trump, the chief executive.
Totally wild. Totally wild.
How many people mobilised against this guy?
And as a contrarian, which is kind of what I am, I kind of
just set myself against whatever it is.
If you tell me to do one thing, I kind of want to do the other
thing. Maybe that's that.
That 80s growing up in the punk rock era where that's what I
thought was cool. It's like you tell me something
like, I'm not going to do that. No, I don't want to do that.
Donald Trump kind of is that, you know, I didn't care for him
in 2016 that much. I was amused that he won.
I actually laughed so hard that I cried when I found out that
Donald Trump won. I was at Quantico and my
roommate thought I had lost my damn mind because I was watching
on CNN with headphones on and I watched Van Jones crying and all
the other things that happen. Some of you guys remember this
night. It was one of those nights when
you could hear the screams of liberals and leftists all the
way up to the heavens, you know, and you're just like, hey, he
won. That's really, really funny.
And it was. And then he came in, did a
pretty good job. So how about that?
And these people have lost their minds ever since.
Alright, CNN, let's go into these incredible historic
rulings because that's what we're going to cover the rest of
the show on. Takeaways from Colorado's
historic ruling that Trump is ineligible for office based on
the 14th Amendment. Insurrectionist Ban.
First of all. First of all, there is no 14th
Amendment. Insurrectionist banned the 14th
Amendment and the protections against people who engaged in
insurrection or rebellion against the United States was
put in When? After the US Civil War, which
man the political left seems to be running at as best they can.
They are so interested in having something.
They really would love to see a bunch of MAGA people engage in
what would be a legitimate uprising against the federal
government. Cause I think we all know that
January 6th was not that. If you showed up with
broomsticks, flagpoles and a hatchet and two people had
firearms, but the firearms were kept in a hotel that were on the
other side because they actually followed state laws.
Like, if that's the if that's your insurrection, man, you do
not know who lives in this country.
I think we showed it the other day.
Ryan actually had a a great thumbnail with it where we had,
like deer hunters, rednecks, people manual skills with
calluses on their hands versus like people who will glue
themselves to a famous piece of art and they will, you know, lay
down in the middle of traffic. Like, that's the kind of, that's
the silliest we're talking about here.
Let's read this article The Supreme Court Colorado made
history. Tuesday made history again.
Historic new low. Yeah, there it was.
That was fun. Those are those people.
Those are the lefties and some guys are using a swing set.
If you're not watching on rumble, you're missing is just
throw up our thumbnail from the other day.
All right. So there we go.
The unprecedented freeze in your tracks ruling.
Look at that. That's really fun freeze in your
tracks ruling. These people are so unbiased
when they report, aren't they, that former President Donald
Trump is constitutionally ineligible to run in 2024
because of the 4th Amendment ban on insurrection is holding
public office covers his conduct on January 6/20/21.
You remember. You guys remember how Donald
Trump was convicted of insurrection?
You remember that in federal court where they had
jurisdiction to do so, where they brought it in the venue
where it happened, which was in in Washington, DC Do you
remember that the DC District Court actually convicted Donald
Trump of insurrection that that specific term, you don't
remember that either because it didn't happen, because that's
not what you can find in a state like Colorado.
When the question was this, did he in fact, is he entitled to be
on the ballot? And the answer that they came up
with is no. Except you guys are gonna find
out. I'm seeing some of you in the
chat are saying you should write him in.
I'm gonna even tell you none of that's even necessary.
Let me just start with this bottom line up front.
Donald Trump will be on the ballot in Colorado regardless of
what these people have decided to do.
He's going to be on the ballot. I will.
I will personally guarantee it right now, and Ronna McDaniels
did the same. Washington Post 4 takeaways from
the Supreme Court in Colorado's disqualifying of Donald Trump
Tuesday will go down as a momentous date in American
political history, with the Colorado Supreme Court ruling
that a former president engaged in insurrection and is therefore
disqualified from the presidency.
All of that is bullshit. It's actual bullshit.
OK? The decision.
Whenever you hear things like this, this should actually tell
you that you know that it's not going to hold up.
You know why the decision, the first of its kind involving
Donald Trump, would keep him off the 2024 primary ballot in the
state over his role in the January 6th insurrection.
I am going to once again tell you, bottom line up front, this
is false. It's actually in the decision.
They've already told us that this will not happen, that this
is not going to be something that actually happens.
This is essentially A glorified press release that is allowing
of fundraising by a left wing organisation.
OK, it will not happen. I can.
I can personally guarantee you they've already told you in the
decision that it will not happen.
That's how I know the Supreme Court of Colorado said they want
to do something, but they're not going to do the thing.
That's why this is so disingenuous.
And that's why all these lefties are crowing.
They're going to try and raise money on it.
That's the entire grift. You guys want to know what the
gift is. The grift is I'm going to tell
you something that I'm never going to do.
Then I'm going to take money for that thing I'm never going to
do. And then you're gonna feel good
about giving me money, even though both of us know that
we're never going to do the thing you said.
All right, the state District Court previously ruled that
Donald Trump had engaged in insurrection.
Right. Because the District Court in
Colorado has standing to decide whether or not Trump is engaged
in insurrection. No, they don't.
It's all fantasy. This is cosplay.
But the relevant section of the 14th Amendment didn't apply to
presidents. That was what the lower court
said. That's kind of amazing too, they
said. Yeah, he's an insurrectionist,
but presidents can't be held liable for the 14th Amendment.
Alright, hot takes, that don't matter.
The state Supreme Court upheld the former finding and reversed
it in a four to three decision. OK, so there's four takeaways
here. They say the historical and
political impact may exceed the direct impact.
And what they've said is essentially that this group
crew, which is the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in
Washington, which is a left wing lunatic group that is used a
cool acronym and some words that they don't actually believe in
ethics and responsibility. What they think is that this is
going to have some far reaching consequences because it's going
to potentially enable and empower other states to do the
same thing. Now you might think that, Oh,
well, this is just one state. Actually they have this lawsuit
in multiple states they thought they could win in, including in
New York and I don't think they win any of them because the more
serious states realise that this is absurd.
But this particular constitution of seven judges who were all
appointed by Democrats, they basically are up for a 10 year
term and then they get reapproved.
And as my understanding it looks like they get voted on a ballot
afterwards, but they initially get appointed by this
Commission. Maybe it's the Commission that
does the voting. The Commission is put together
by the Governor. So this is a it's an indirect
gubernatorial appointment to be on the Supreme Court of
Colorado's SCOTUS. So it's not SCOTUS.
Supreme Court. Sorry, SCOTUS only refers to the
US Supreme Court. Do me a Fact Check on that,
folks. If you guys find otherwise.
I actually dug into this as much as I could.
I could care to dig into Colorado, which I don't live in,
and a Supreme Court that makes weird decisions from what it
looks like. It's appointed by the governor.
The governor has a board of people that he appoints that
basically give him a short list. He chooses from the short list
and then they either reaffirm them every ten years or not is
what it looks like. But it also they're on
Ballotpedia, which is one of the voting websites.
So it's kind of hard to tell that.
Anyway, long and short of it is, let's break down what they said.
Direct impact is that it could happen in another state.
I don't think that's gonna happen, but so be it doesn't
really matter if it does. The the court disagreed with the
judge who said that presidents were different, that they were
excluded from the 14th Amendment, which they're not.
And so, OK, that's fine. What's interesting to me is that
this, the state Supreme Court took up a bunch of stuff from
the US Constitution, and they're making rulings on the US
Constitution, but I don't know under what standing they have
because they're not. They're not U.S.
Federal courts. So why they would take that into
account is beyond me. And then it says that there's a
converging traffic jam in the Supreme Court about Donald
Trump. That tells you a lot about it
too, doesn't it, that the whole point is to jam up the Supreme
Court with a bunch of decisions about Donald Trump.
I mean, when you start throwing all these things, they fast
track the decision with counsel, Special counsel Jack Smith,
right? Claim of presidential immunity,
claim of 14th Amendment. Like all this stuff is gonna go
into one thing. And I assume the Supreme Court
is gonna have to just do this big sort of thing going like
what in the hell are you guys doing or not?
They may not. They may actually not have the
courage of their convictions. And the last one is that the
long running 14th Amendment effort reaches a milestone.
And that milestone is essentially that they are trying
to be able to rule on the word insurrection and that people can
be disqualified from office without ever being charged with
that crime. They're trying to do an end
around, legally speaking, they're trying to get a ruling
on something that they actually don't have.
The standing is what I would imagine the word they don't have
standing to go and do this. You can't rule on something in
this country that you have not been convicted of.
Like how could you ever rule that these are all civil cases,
by the way. So these are lawsuits that are
filed in civil court and I want to cover real quickly the
difference for you all. As you think about it, there are
two legal standards at play almost always.
One of them is in civil court, which you may be familiar with,
and the other one is in Criminal Court.
Now, Criminal Court, everyone kind of has heard this, but it's
worth hammering home that criminal courts, when they
convict you, they have to find you guilty beyond a shadow of a
doubt, right? Beyond any reasonable doubt.
Nobody should be able to doubt that you are in fact guilty,
which makes it even sadder when we get that wrong, which these
courts sometimes do. But that's the burden, it's the
highest burden that basically there is no reasonable doubt
against it, But that is not what civil courts do.
And that's what this was. This was a civil court, and the
civil court said that it has to be a preponderance of the
evidence. The the standard of
preponderance of the evidence is like it's more likely than not
that it happened. It's more likely yes than no.
OK And that's the big difference.
Rather than the shadow of a doubt, the reasonable doubt is
beyond all reasonable doubt. Boom.
We move to. It's probably true.
That's what they ruled in this, which is why there's no criminal
standing in these things. And they are trying to basically
get a ruling that that gets groundswell in public opinion in
a way that's very different. Let's cover Fox's version of
this, too, because why not? And then we're going to dig into
who these justices are, because I actually found one little
interesting tidbit that I don't think you'll hear anywhere else.
And I'll tell you why this is all bullshit.
All right, Colorado. Nixing Trump strikingly,
undemocratically unites experts. As Escalier clerk declares
lawfare, the Vega Ramaswami decided to bow out of the
ballot. Trump.
Sorry, Trump.
Trump. Trump's critic Chris Christie
also said the court's decision was bad.
And he generally sort of doesn't agree that people should be
doing this sort of thing. They're all kind of like, weak
tea on this. Honestly, at the end of the day,
it doesn't really matter. We might as well play it now.
Take a deep breath here. Let's play this video.
This is since Vivek is brought up, let's bring up the Vake
video. This is what his response was.
I'm going to go pull up the court decision, which we have
here as well. And I'm going to tell you that
they actually tell us in the court decision that this is
actually, this is grandstanding, but, you know, good on the fake.
He's capitalising politically on something that's out there in
the world. So let's run go #1 real quick.
They have just tried to bar President Trump from the
Colorado ballot using an unconstitutional manoeuvre that
is a bastardization of the 14th Amendment to our US
Constitution. This was a provision, Section 3,
that was designed to bar Confederate members.
People switched to the Confederacy from actually being
able to serve. That's very different than
what's at issue here, to say the least.
This is a hollowed out husk of what the country was built on.
The basic principle that we the people select our leadership,
not the unelected elite class in the back of palace calls.
That's Old World Europe, not the United States.
That's why I'm making a pledge today that I will withdraw.
I pledge to withdraw from the Colorado GOP primary ballot
unless and until Trump Trump's name is restored.
And I demand that Ron DeSantis and Chris Christie and Nikki
Haley do the same thing, or else these Republicans are simply
complicit in this unconstitutional attack on the
way we conduct our constitutional Republic.
I refuse to be complicit in that.
I think what they're doing is wrong, and I think it's up to
Republicans to step up and stand up with a spine for our
country's future. That's really what's at stake,
whether we, the people, actually have a say in deciding who leads
this country. Yes, it would be easier for
other Republicans like me who are running in this race to say,
hey, if Trump is sidelined, there's our opportunity.
No doubt other candidates are probably privately celebrating
with their corporate sponsors. That's not the right thing to
do. I think the most useful thing
that every GOP candidate can do right now is to join me in that
pledge. I'll say that I will withdraw
from that Colorado GOP primary ballot until Trump's name is
restored. This belongs to the people, not
to the unelected Democratic cabal of judges in Colorado or
any other state. And I demand that Ron DeSantis
and Nikki Haley and Chris Christie do the same thing, or
else they're complicit in what this security state is trying to
do to shut down. I stand by that and I expect
them to do the right thing. OK, so good sentiment and we
agree with what he's feeling. But this was an emotional
outburst that has no bearing on reality.
Because Trump's going to be on the ballot, folks.
He's going to be on the ballot. I'm going to read you the
decision itself. Let's pull up the New York
Times. Little coverage of it.
They actually posted the whole document, which is worth your
time. But if we pulled the New York
Times, here's the opening from New York Times.
It literally says this, read the Colorado Supreme Court's
decision disqualifying Trump from the ballot December 19th.
Yesterday, Colorado top court ruled on Tuesday that former
President Donald J Trump is disqualified from holding office
again because he engaged in insurrection leading up to the
January 6th storming of the Capitol.
Love all their charged language. In fact, Fox News said it pretty
clearly. Laura Ingraham had a pretty good
little quote about it saying that they just keep using the
word insurrection so that they can bring up the 14th Amendment.
But as noted, he's never actually been convicted of that.
Nor will he. I'm sure.
So here we go. Let's read directly from the
words of this thing. They put out the first little
piece. It's like the executive summary.
It's called the advanced sheet head note.
This is the press release and what it says in this appeal from
a District Court proceeding under the Colorado Election
Code. The Supreme Court considers
whether former President Donald J Trump may appear on the
Colorado Republican primary ballot in 2024.
That is the issue that was being decided in this court.
The majority of the Court holds that Donald J Trump, former
President Trump, is disqualified from holding office as President
under section three of the amendment of the 14th Amendment
in the United States Constitution.
Because he's disqualified, it would be a wrongful act under
the Election Code for the Colorado Secretary of State to
list him as a candidate in the primary.
The presidential primary ballot and the ruling stays here as it
is right here. Are you ready?
The court stays its ruling until January 4th, 2024.
Subject any further appellate proceedings in the first little
press release, they let you know that they have issued a
statement that they will be suspending his name for the
ballot. And then they stay their own
opinion right now until January 4th.
And then we're going to read a little further.
We go down to Page 8, which I'll just read here.
You guys can just pay attention at home.
We're gonna go to Page 8 of their own summary and they say
the following, and I'm going to directly quote from this
decision. We are also cognizant that we
travel in uncharted territory again, that first of its kind
piece worth honing in on usually because they don't represent
anything constitutional. And that this case presents
several issues of first impression.
In other words, novel like we talked about yesterday with Doug
Mackey but for our resolution of the Electors challenge under the
election code, the secretary would be required to include
Donald Trump's name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, it
says. But for our resolution, the
Secretary would be required to put his name on there,
therefore, to maintain the status quo.
What's the status quo? The the way it's always been to
maintain the status quo. Pending in your review by the
Supreme Court, the US Supreme Court, We stay our own ruling
until January 4th of 2024, the day before the Secretary's
deadline to certify the content of the primary, the Presidential
primary ballot, if review is sought in the Supreme Court
before this day expires. In other words, if they request
a review, not that the the Supreme Court agrees to take it,
but if they if review is sought is what it says before this day
expires on January 4th, 2024, then the stay shall remain in
place and the Secretary will be continued to require to include
President Trump's name on the 2024 Presidential primary ballot
until the receipt of any order or mandate from the Supreme
Court. Did you guys catch that?
They just said we believe this thing and we're going to do
nothing about it because we have an order that says he should be
removed. But what we order is, is that
our order should be suspended until somebody else looks at it.
Because our decision is suspect and it's weak and it's crap and
it's going to be challenged right away and we know that.
We're just putting it out there so we can make a headline.
This is a press release. This could have been drafted by
Jen Saki, like sitting in a hot tub drinking margaritas, because
this is a like a wet dream of fundraising for Democrats.
But it has zero bearing on what's going to happen in
Colorado. They are opening this is that
321 thing. This is when you walk up and you
say something really absurd like, hey, I'd really like to
take you home and cut your head off and someone goes like, Oh my
God, what? And you're like just kidding.
I just like to take you out to dinner for a date.
Like you step back like 2 steps and be like, hey, but if you're
doing wild stuff, like, maybe I am too.
That's three, two, one. That's a really crazy idea.
That's exactly what they did. They just said, hey, we're gonna
knock Donald Trump off the ballot.
You won't be able to vote for the guy.
And people are like, what? And like, just kidding.
We're actually gonna say that back.
We're not gonna do that. We just said is that we believe
that we're not gonna do anything about it.
And then you go, oh, really? And then they're gonna try to
move it one step forward. This is the same thing that
happened with the New Mexico gun laws when they're like, we're
banning all guns in public parks and we're gonna suspend your
ability to carry firearms and you go, what?
And then people that are sort of like lunatic liberals, like a
David Hogg, David Hogg comes forward and says, like, yeah,
like that's too crazy even for me.
I just believe in common sense, gun control, This is a three to
one step forward. It's three steps forward.
It's two steps back and they're going to test one step forward
again, which will still put them two steps ahead.
OK, that's what's going on here. It's nonsense.
He will continue to be on the ballot.
He shall remain in place and he will be required to put Donald
Trump's name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot
until receipt of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court.
All they have to do is ask. And Ronna McDaniels has already
said that the GOP National committee is like the the the
GOP at large is going to challenge this, which is the
right answer, of course. So it doesn't matter what Vivek
says and it doesn't matter if Chris Christie backs it or
anyone else. None of that matters.
This is 100% going to be a nothing.
But what it is about is what these people that CREW are
trying to do and that is worth looking at.
So we're gonna pull up their web page right now.
CREW again, this is the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in
Washington. They have this as their lead
piece. And Ryan, do you want to show
the little pop up that comes on if you were to to pull up the
CREW website? What do we see right there?
There it is right there. CREW successfully barred Trump
from the Colorado about it, completely ignoring the reality
of what that order means. But they're going to raise on
it. Do you guys want to get $500 or
chip in any other amount? 2551 hundred two, $5500.
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Trump is disqualified from
holding office because he incited the insurrection.
That's the top line. And then the real line on Page 8
is just kidding. We're not going to do any of
this crap. None of this is actually going
to happen. It's worth noting how much you
are being gaslighted and that's why when I have how low can you
go? This is really pretty low.
Stuff like this is not a search warrant and this is not using
legal process. This is literally fantasy world
where they have cosplayed. Let's cover down on who these
judges are by the way, because I think that's worth our time.
There are 7 justices on three that voted in dissent.
Brian Boatwright, Carlos Samour junior and Maria Burkhalter, all
three of them have one thing in common, folks.
You know what that thing is? They all went to law school in
Denver, at the University of Denver School of Law.
That's kind of interesting. Why did all three of those
people go to law school in Denver, in Colorado?
Well, is that something different than the four people
who voted in favour? And it turns out that being a
Colorado liberal type who went to a law school in Colorado
leads you to a completely different side of the coin.
The people who voted in favour of this particular motion, the
4/3 split, there they are, right there, going from left to right,
from left. If you'll just leave that up on
the screen there, right from left to right, we see Monica
Marquez. Where did she go to school?
You think School of Law, huh? I'm looking.
I'm looking.
Did she go to Harvard? Is that where she went or did
she go to Yale? I know she's listed on both of
these things. Sorry.
Bah Bah Bah Bah Bah Bah Bah Bah Bah Bah.
One more second here folks. I had these all laid out and
then of course their BIOS lead to a bunch of different
nonsense. She was a was teaching at the
Yale Latino Law Student Association.
She won their public service award.
So she has ties over there. But if my memory serves, I think
she actually went, no, no, she did.
She went to Yale. OK, so Yale there.
William Hood is gonna be on the far right hand side.
He's the bald guy that's pictured right there.
And he went to UVA. He went to the University of
Virginia School of Law, another East Coast school, and we're
going to go to the top. That's Gabriel, Richard Gabriel.
He's wearing the glasses there with the silly moustache.
And he went to the University of Pennsylvania Ivy League school.
He went and did that. And then our last girl, Melissa
Hart, she's kind of the frumpy hair on the right at the top.
And she actually went to Harvard and she was the the editor for
the Harvard Law Review when she was there.
So you've got maybe adjacent schools and then you've got
three that dissented that all went to school in Colorado and
Denver and are actually Coloradans.
Is that a term Coloradans? I think it is.
I think that's really interesting.
I just think it's interesting that when you choose where
people went to school, you find out a little bit about them and
you find out a little bit way they think.
It turns out where you send your kids to school makes a big
difference. And this is one of those things.
This is just a strange little strange little tidbit.
It's one simple factoid, but it does tell us a lot about where
you should be sending your kids or where you shouldn't be.
Let's let's wrap up Weird Wednesday with something that's
kind of fun. This is from Libs of TikTok and
live the tick Tock. We're gonna play a video here of
the world that they think this is the way a lot of these loony
lefties have been thinking about stuff.
It's about violence. It's about weirdness.
It's about how angry they are about Donald Trump or anybody
disagreeing with them. So we're going to play video #2,
video #2, Let's go ahead and roll roll video #2.
And I think we lost mikes to to Ryan, so let me just send it
right over to him. We're going to roll video to.
Really overly dramatic or anything.
Can we just start stabbing transphobes at this point?
Like we have such a big problem of transfer, with people being
fucking idiots and not getting their shit kicked in, can we
just start kicking their shit in?
It would be so much easier for everyone in the entire world.
Would be so much better if we could just stab a transphobe,
say something transphobic. You get stabbed.
The world would be beautiful. Yikes, right?
Alright, so it's weird. Wednesday we dug it a little bit
deeper. We've got some video of this guy
getting ready for this TikTok video.
You wanna play Video 3? Hello.
Come on, girl. Precious, come on.
It 4 Who? I got a yummy, OK.
Peace. All things precious.
How are you up there, you little shit?
Come and get it, pretty girl. Hi.
See. Purchase.
Please come, come, he told me. I see.
Come on. Hopes and dreams see.
Will you fuck me? Come on, take that bump.
Come on. Come on.
Come on hard, her fucking soul. Oh,
I over you.
Come on, guys. You guys don't like Que Lazarus.
That's Goodbye Horses. That that song has a special
place in my heart. What you just saw there,
obviously, was the the gentleman who was angry about transphobes
getting ready. It's a little bit of a throwback
to the 80s. Some of you may remember that.
That's the way we used to look at people who had
autogynephilia, who fantasised about themselves dressed as
women. I told you it's weird.
Wednesday, I wasn't gonna let you guys down.
I really wasn't. It's weird, right?
That's weird. If you dress up and have hangy
shit hanging off your glasses and you got things swinging and
dangling and you wanna stab people that don't agree that you
are the thing that you believe you are when you're doing the
tuck. By the way, that's the name for
it. That's the official name TM the
Tuck. Yeah.
How do I know that? Because when I was in the
military when I was enlisted, I had a a marine that came over
the Air Force with me and every Friday he would do the tuck and
play Q Lazarus really loud in the barracks and walk around
completely naked doing the tuck and banging on guys doors.
And then just and he was he was our team Sergeant.
So like he was the boss he would just mess with people and I
would die laughing because that is such a strange thing to do
when you're a 30 year old man like knocking on the door of 18
year old boys and scaring the hell out of him.
But you know what? It's pretty weird.
And we knew it was weird. It was weird on purpose, as a
joke. There are people doing it for
serious right now. And those people are the ones
that are voting for the looney left positions.
They're the ones that think that Donald Trump shouldn't be on the
ballot because anybody who doesn't agree with them should
be stabbed and maybe they wanna make a woman suit out of you.
I don't know. I just kind of miss the world
where things made sense, which is that if you do weird stuff
like Buffalo Bill just did there.
Jamie gum. Yeah, I'm.
I'm kind of a Silence of the Lambs kind of guy.
If you do that, you know, maybe we don't take you seriously as a
society and maybe we go check your basement to make sure that
you don't have some senator's daughter down there that you're
starving to death and trying to to dehydrate until you can skin
her. Yeah.
Are all trans people trying to do that?
No. A lot of them are sad and self
loathing and all the other kind of things.
But there's real weirdos out there folks.
And for Weird Wednesday, we just brought it to you.
Look at this guy. He's not well.
Nobody is confusing you for a chick.
They're confusing you for Buffalo Bill and they're
wondering what's going on in your basement there chief.
So there it is. You guys have had the entirety
of our Weird Wednesday show. I do appreciate you guys
sticking around and enjoying it. Hopefully you are now put to
rest that you are not going to freak out.
Lemon Zinger was not interested in the visuals, but so be it.
I hope you guys understand that this is not going to happen.
Trump is not being removed from any ballot.
That's the most important thing you should walk away with.
And we should at least accept that this is cosplay.
Very similar to doing the tuck and dancing around tack Penis
doesn't wanna picture anybody in a bathtub.
I'm not mad at you. That's fine.
All right, well, let's let's do a five star review here.
I think that's the right way to go.
We'll thank all of you guys for joining us on the audio podcast,
which continues to grow. And we continue to have more and
more of you leaving five star views.
The link is in the show description and we will read
yours. Just like Fez Knicks which says
great show, five stars. One of the three podcasts I
listen to daily with Ben Shapiro and Dan Bongino.
That's pretty high praise there, Mr Cesnik or Miss Sesnick says.
I know that you are like me and proud of your service, but
ashamed that this is not the country we fought for.
Keep up the great work, man. Is it ever.
You know, the country I grew up in knew that Jamie Gum and
Buffalo Bill were straight up weirdos.
And today we're trying to celebrate those people and
putting them on the lawn of the White House and letting them
celebrate in a costume for Easter.
Very, very strange. Whatever 77 says, even if the
ruling will almost certainly be overturned.
The Colorado court decision represents law fair to obstruct
the election. It's unacceptable across a huge
light, white, red light. I totally agree with you.
Yeah, it's totally a red line, but it's also worth not getting
our panties in a bunch about it. It's not beyond the political
left. Let's understand that reality
still triumphs. Folks, thanks for following us
today. Thanks for being with us today.
Appreciate you guys putting a like on rumble.com/kyle Serafin.
If you guys listen to our audio channel and you ever want to see
the visuals of what we're getting into, that's where you
go. rumble.com/kyle Serafin. We appreciate all of your your
attention and we'll see you again tomorrow.
We've got something really wild coming tomorrow, so watch the
Twitter feed at Kyle Serafin on Truth or on X.
Check those out because we're going to bring something fun to
you. I think we're going to do a
double team. And we're going to have Steve
Friend and Gerard Boyle from the American Radicals.
We're gonna put a a double stream to both channels.
We're still working on it. We're going to get the details
finalised, so watch the watch the Twitter thing.
We'll see you again tomorrow. God bless you.
Thanks for listening to The Kyle Serafin Show streamed live
weekdays on rubble.com/kyle Serafin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, True Social, and Instagram at Kyle
Serafin.