Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello, my friends.
Welcome to the Kyle Seraphin show.
We're about a minute and a half late, which always makes people
a little bit nervous in our chat.
You never know when someone might kick down the door over
here. So far, so good.
Thank God we've got Donald Trump in office.
I actually mean that in that very serious way because as I
was reflecting with Owen Shroyer the other day and Alex Jones, I
went over to the Infowars studio and sat down with those.
We were talking kind of off camera about what a difference
it makes because you don't actually have to worry about
that. That being said, we've still got
guys getting swatted. It is something that are
concerned about over there and obviously if it happens to you,
you have to be aware that there's still real dangers in
the world because when the left is injured, it is still quite
dangerous. It's a thing that can happen.
So we just got to be grateful for the things that we have, the
good things that are going on right now.
I'm going to kind of give you a little taste of what we're going
to get into today. We're going to be talking about
the Supreme Court and a ruling on ghost guns.
I think they got it wrong. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court
is mediocre on guns. It continues to be.
We're going to talk about constitutional carry, which is
coming down and being pushed around in the House right now.
Some debate going on about it. Of course, Tom Massey doing a
really good job of articulating the issues and in fact,
championing guns in general. Second Amendment should be a
pretty absolute right. You kind of have an absolute
right, pretty darn close to being able to say anything you
want in this country. You also should be able to own
firearms and make your own. That's my take on it.
We're going to talk a little bit more, we can't help it, about
the signal discussion. This will signal gate op versus
oops situation. We had a great conversation
yesterday with George Hill coming in and giving his take on
it. The more I listen, the more I
look, the more I read about what we are seeing both overseas and
domestically, it makes me believe overwhelmingly that this
was not an accident, that they didn't do this, you know, as
some sort of misunderstanding that someone screwed up.
We're going to continue to be able to watch it because if we
do see a big personnel change, if someone like Mike Walton's a
paying for it, that'll be a that'll be something that we can
we can hang our hat on and say, OK, yeah, they actually thought
he screwed up unless they were using it to, you know, kind of
squish him out. Either way.
It's just more depends to me on who is running the OP.
Is it being run inside by the Trump administration or if
someone else was doing it from the outside or if there's some
disloyal member of the of the cabinet staff, always a
possibility. I'm still leaning towards the
media is getting played on this that I just, I can't see it any
other way. I've been part of too many
Signal chats. So we'll we'll do more of it.
And there's no other way to do it because the media is obsessed
with it. It's on front page of every
single piece. So we'll talk further about
that. They tried to jam up Cash Patel
with some questions about it. Pretty funny.
We're going to talk about NPR, maybe the silliest, most woke,
goofy, state funded media that exists in America.
I used to listen to it with my father.
We'd listen to All Things Considered.
They used to make really great radio programming and for some
reason now they're just propaganda.
We're also going to talk about the propaganda of Voice of
America. A couple other things on their
tariffs. Tariffs are coming, they're
inbound, and we're not talking about those a lot. 100 days of
Donald Trump's first or second administration kind of coming
due. And we're sort of looking at a
retrospective there. So that's where we're going with
today's show. There's a lot involved in that.
As usual, I try to cram as much in there so I don't get bored.
Hopefully that means that you don't get bored, and that's what
we're going to do. As we're talking about Signal
and as we are talking about apps that are on your phone, you
might be thinking about your cell phone service.
So now is a good time as any to talk about it, folks.
You can check out Patriot Mobile if you want to support the
program and support yourself. It's patriotmobile.com/KSS.
Just because the election is one, there's still a massive
fight to restore our great nation.
That is obviously the case. We're only at the beginning
here. So you can take a stand with
Patriot Mobile. They are America's only
conservative and Christian wireless provider.
They offer you an opportunity to vote with your wallet.
You can do so without compromising on quality or
convenience. And they're not just about
providing cell phone service everywhere.
It's actually a call to action to defend your rights, including
the Second Amendment. With Patriot Mobile, you're
going to get outstanding nationwide coverage.
They operate on all three of the major networks.
And you'll also be able to say that if you have cell phone
service today, you can get it with Patriot Mobile.
Very easy to do. Their coverage is guaranteed.
The difference is that every dollar you spend is going to
support the 1st amendment, the Second Amendment, the sanctity
of live veterans, first responders, and other things we
care about. And switching is quite easy.
You can keep your number, keep your cell phone, you can upgrade
either one or both or neither. Do what you need to use KSS to
get a free month of service. They have 100% US based tech
support, so if you want to call them, it's 972 Patriot.
Use that promo code KSS for a free month of service.
That means you can get, I guess, 112th off the entire year's
bill. Check them out.
Switch to Patriot Mobile today. Defend freedom with every call
and text that you make. Thanks so much to them.
Let's get into it today on this Thursday, March the 27th.
All right, so let's go start something where the where they
say the very beginning, I don't know.
The very beginning is the Bill of Rights.
For me, it continues to be the most important thing that we do.
The Supreme Court is upholding rules requiring background
checks for ghost guns. I'm not a big fan of this.
I'm not a big fan of this at all.
And I wish that the Trump administration was stronger on
guns. I don't know that they ever will
be. It would be the nicest way for
us to see this go forward because they do have unilateral
control of the ATF and the rules that are put forward and whether
or not they choose to enforce them.
So even though the Supreme Court is going to continue on, and
even though, you know, this has already been decided that it
was, it was advancing. So the decision came from
arguments not made by Donald Trump's administration.
But it still bothers me that they don't really get it.
I don't feel like 1990s Democrats understood guns was
the same people that passed the the the assault weapons ban,
which was kind of silly. And Donald Trump's a New Yorker.
So let's just call things as we see them Again.
I don't have to cosign on every single thing that the guy does
because I'm not a cheerleader. That's not my goal here.
Supreme Court on Wednesday, that was yesterday upheld a Biden era
federal regulation on ghost guns.
Even that is nonsensical. There's nothing ghostly about
them. You can see them.
They're not invisible. They're not spectral or of the
spirit world. Their physical guns that you
just happen to make for yourself the way that Americans have done
for all time like always. Americans actually didn't used
to have factories, right? Like anybody who goes back into
their basic, let's call it called middle school history.
You heard about the cotton gin and Eli Whitney.
Didn't we hear about this kind of stuff?
You heard about Samuel Colt kind of revolutionizing and making
all men equal, right? God declared it.
And then you've got you've got Colt out there actually doing it
because people actually were able to own firearms for the
first time. It used to be that you had to
either make them or know someone who made them and do some kind
of bartering or trading. All guns were made at home.
Serial numbers are a relatively new thing.
I actually am going to have to get my buddy Steven Stampolilla
on here again to talk about some of the ridiculousness of
requiring a serial number because even the idea that a
serial number must be on a gun, it's a relatively new idea you
can find that you can buy. Well, you can't buy them
anymore, but you could actually hone.
You can have them if you inherited them from family
members going back only about 50 years ago, 50-60 years ago.
If you have guns that go back into the the 1950s or 1960s,
historical firearms, they do not have serial numbers on them.
The the concept that every gun must have a serial number is
based in the idea that at some point in time all firearms will
be used in a crime and therefore law enforcement will need to
track them. But I'm just going to tell you,
doing a trace on a serial number, it doesn't tell you what
you think it does. It doesn't tell you the
geolocation. These things are not, they're
not like satellite mapping programs.
It's a number that goes back to a database somewhere that the
ATF is not even supposed to have.
What happens is every time an FFL goes out of business, the
ATF goes in and swoops up, collects all these records of
4470 threes so they can find the last time that it was legally
transferred at a place that is required to do a legal transfer
on a federal level by an FFL. But that doesn't mean that's
what happens. I've got guns from all of the
I've got guns that I bought that you have no way to know that I
have until you find out out that you have them.
You know, I bought them from some private party, as you're
meant to do. In the same way that the
government doesn't track chainsaws or hammers or any
other tool. There's no reason that we need
to have these serial numbers. I think it's a bad take.
This was a 7 two majority. Neil Gorsuch wrote it.
They all sided together because they don't understand what it is
that they're talking about. They're they're looking at crime
as though that is the issue. But this is not the case for the
overwhelming number of firearms. And we don't have numbers on how
many guns have been built by people in their own hands.
And having 1600 turn up by police at crime scenes in 2017
and 19,000 pop up in 2021. None of those things matter.
There's already rules. There are already laws against
you using a gun in criminal activity, that's why they're
called a crime scene. So how you got the tool almost
becomes irrelevant to me. Or was it a stolen hammer?
Was he buying it at an Ace Hardware?
I don't care if you beat someone to death with a hammer, you are
probably in violation of a bunch of other laws and you decided
those didn't matter because you used a a tool at a crime.
This is the worst take. It continues to be a really,
really bad idea. But in any case, they're
supposed to review these. The attorney general supposed to
look at them. Pam Bondi's records on gun is
not very good People who are the the gun types, and I follow a
bunch of them. They're very, very cautious
about where you're going to see firearms pop up with with this
administration because it could go either way.
We could see a complete like deregulation of suppressors.
We could also see it go the other way because they don't get
it. The upside is Don Junior, Donald
Trump's son, is a gun guy, like a real gun guy.
He does gun reviews. I've seen videos of him take
takedown rifles and put them together.
That's pretty cool. It's cool to have somebody
that's at least in close proximity that came out of a New
York family and now actually owns like, you know,
suppressors, machine guns and so on.
All that stuff's good. But we don't have an AG who is
going to determine policy or help align policy and is going
to decide what to fight and what not to fight, what battles are
going to get involved in on the court side of it.
So here's Tom Massie. I think he's always the sensible
one. He's talking about the issue for
reciprocity, which is currently, I think it's called House Bill
38, but he'll tell it in just a second.
It's a bill where they're deciding whether or not we are
going to see concealed carry reciprocity across the United
States. By the way, this should have
been a very easy move directly after the the Oberfeld decision.
If you can go get married in Massachusetts and you have to
recognize that marriage in Texas with your two men or two women,
then there's no reason why an actual constitutional liberty,
something that has been that predates the Constitution, is a
God-given right as defined by our founders.
That thing needs to be codified across the nation.
And I'm not even crazy about you having to go get a permit for
it, But there's a couple of quick discussions, people who
decide to go get permits, and I've done it both ways.
By the way, folks, I've carried constitutionally, which is what
I do today. I don't have a Texas permit.
I don't feel a need to. I live in Texas, America.
Thankfully, Texas, after years and years of moving forward,
they actually used to be pretty retrograde on firearms rights.
They started fixing themselves in the 90s.
By the time I got out of the military in 2012, I went and got
myself my first constitutional permit or my my first state
issued permit rather. And then when I got out of the
FBII found that I didn't need to carry one.
I lived in Arizona for a little while and I've lived in Texas.
Both now constitutional carry states, which is to say your
permit is the constitution because you were born in America
and God gives you certain rights, including the right to
self-defense. These are things that I'm, I'm
not flexible on anyway, Tom Massie talking about this.
It's nice to have a voice who gets this, who understands who
owns belt feds or at least knows how to shoot them.
I also saw a pretty cool video of JD Vance shooting on the
other day. So, you know, there's something
to be said about having an administration that at least has
people that are gun types around it.
Tom Massey on on this retro, what do you call it, Reciprocity
Act. Mr. Chairman, I appreciate HR
38, Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act.
I intend to vote for it, but, and when it was first drafted, I
think it was more complete. But what what has happened is
we've had a Supreme Court decision and we've had some
activity by the states, sort of changes the nature of HR 38.
What were those? What is that activity?
Well, 29 states are now constitutional carry.
This will address Mr. Goldman's concern. 29 states are now
constitutional carry. HR 38 sets up a situation where
if you are in a state like Kentucky that has constitutional
carry and you travel to a state like California, which does not
have constitutional carry, I can I have in some ways more rights
to carry a gun in California than does a California resident
under the framework that's that HR 38 would establish.
Now, that was just, those were just a few exceptions here and
there to HR 38 when there weren't that many constitutional
carry states, but now there are 29 constitutional carry states.
What else has happened? Well, the Supreme Court
decision, Bruin says that every state now has to issue a permit.
So if I'm from Kentucky and I have constitutional carry, it
means I now have constitutional carry in every state under HR
38. It's there's also some sort of
this other issue that Mister Goldman, actually Mr. Nadler's
amendment got to that my amendment solves, because my
amendment, by the way, is just a statement of a bill that I have
offered, which is national constitutional carry.
National constitutional carry is the way it should go, by the
way, that's that's exactly what it says in the Bill of Rights.
And, and, and you find in that libs always have this issue.
People on the political left have this really hard time if
the state law favors what they want to do, let's say more
restrictive ownership of firearms and they're big fans of
states rights. It suddenly becomes something
they're really interested in. And then you find out that when
it comes to the national position on something, gay
marriage, right, states would outlaw that if they can go ahead
and get a they, they loved Roe V.
Wade, which was a national priority.
This was case law that was established by the federal
courts. Then they're suddenly like, you
know all about federal sovereignty.
The fact the matter is, if you're willing to play whatever
side suits you, you don't have any principles at all.
We either have a supremacy clause in this country or we
don't. Either the federal law doesn't
allow you to do things right and it does give you certain access
that you cannot restrict. Either it does or it doesn't.
Either federal law is the supreme law of the land or not.
If we can more narrowly and more aggressively tune back some of
those things because of local priorities, that should be the
case for everywhere. Which means a state should be
able to say now you can't be married and we don't recognize
gay marriage. I've always found these to be 1
to one. For some reason.
Left is always want to talk about cars.
There are so many more regulations on firearms than
there are on cars. And a lot of it, it's like, OK,
under what circumstance do you feel like you're entitled to
travel on federally funded and state funded and publicly funded
roadways when we're talking about something that you could
own in your own house? And many Americans throughout
almost all of the non urban areas do on their own properties
or on private properties where it has nothing to do with what
the public is. It's not like we're talking
about people going to public shooting ranges, carrying them
and doing things in public with them most of the time, and
they're carrying their own private property in a way that
you can't see it. I'm not a big fan of open carry,
by the way, folks, unless you have like a real dressy piece.
I've actually got a 44 mag revolver like right over here
sitting on the wall in case I ever need a 44 mag revolver from
the 70s. You know, it's got a big cowboy
rig and all that. I'm fine with you having a dress
piece. If you want to have a Kimber or
some sort of beautiful handmade Nighthawk custom that you wear
to a barbecue in 1911 or some other, you know, a logical carry
gun, knock yourself the hell out.
But in general, carrying a firearm and, and publicly
showing it like a police officer does, all it does is say I'm the
guy with the gun you need to kill first if something bad
happens. But concealed carry, which is
very, very common and actually is the way that most people
think about it. You hear the word CHL, concealed
handgun license or CCW, depending on what state you live
in. These things are a big deal.
They're they're really smart and they shouldn't actually be even
necessary because either you're able to own a gun and therefore
we trust you with your own God-given rights or we don't A
little discussion that's going on setting up maybe one of the
dumbest members and most illiberal.
Remember, this is a civil liberty to be able to do things
that God gave you the right to do by your by virtue of you
being born in the United States. This is a discussion of CCW
holders, CHL holders, people who actually go through an
additional background check so they can carry a concealed
handgun license. They've gone to the state and
say, hey, I'd like also additional privileges.
Some of those privileges include like you don't have to do a 4473
in those states. You can just show them that you
have one on file which is in fact your your concealed carry
license. How about this?
Do those people ever in any state represent more danger to
the public than the general public and at large?
Almost always. What you'll find is that CHLCCW
holders in the United States have a lower instance of crime
than even law enforcement officers.
Put that into your head. Background check.
Private citizens are less likely to engage in a criminal
violation of law than almost any other subset.
And I don't know of anywhere that actually is the case that
it's not true, as was discussed. Of course, Dan Goldman doesn't
have that information in front of him.
So let's go ahead and hear this little takedown.
We're going to do a couple of really good folks on the right
destroying folks on the left in Congress and in hearings because
it needs to be done. Can you give me an example of
any state where CCW holders commit homicide or any crime at
a rate that is higher than the general population does?
I don't have that data in front of me, but I'm happy to look
into it because you made some claims about how if we allow
this policy, it's going to unleash criminals or, you know,
violence upon the rest of the country.
It would seem for that, maybe you'd have a point if there were
some state out there where, you know, it's standards are so low
that you have all kinds of criminals getting their hands on
CCWS and, kidding, committing terrible crimes.
But to my knowledge, there is no example of any such state.
To the contrary, the data shows that CCW holders are usually,
you know, 10 times less likely to commit crimes, including
violent crimes, than the general population.
Will the gentleman yield? Sure.
I would just point out the data on gun violence in states that
have LAX gun laws and states that have strict gun laws,
because what you will find is there's a direct correlation to
gun violence and the amount of gun violence in the states
depending on how strict and restrictive their gun laws are.
OK, but that's not the question on this bill.
We're talking about CCW holders. It's it's always false
equivalency. They always want to act like one
thing is happening when something else is going on.
And by the way, is it really Dan Goldman, Is it really a direct
correlation? Is there a one to one
relationship with the increased amount of firearm, you know,
laws and the decrease amount of gun violence, which is a made-up
turn? No, it's not.
It's it's complete bullshit. There's no question in my mind
that what he's saying. He's using false words.
And of course we can't have the debate we want to have.
We're talking about concealed handgun carry license holders.
We are not talking about generally the Speaking of
whether or not they're like the the use of guns.
Of course, if you have more pools, there are going to be
more pool drownings if you have more guns than maybe that.
But then you got to explain to me Illinois.
You've got to explain to me New York City, you got to explain to
me Philadelphia. You've got to explain to me
places where the laws don't actually line up with what
they're saying. And there's tons of this.
We're never going to get these people to make up their mind and
actually speak honestly about it, but we might as well talk
about it. Let me do a couple of other
little interesting stories. I got some Texas stories.
Then I want to get into the the NPR thing, which I thought was
kind of a fun little takedown. And then we'll get into this
ongoing signal versus the noise thing, which we just can't get
away from it. I'm I'm not mad that the media
is actually like obsessed with it.
It's kind of fun. This is something I've had a lot
of folks tag me on social media because they know I live in
Texas. This is the governor, Greg, Hot
Wheels Abbott. Yes, I'm going to start using
that because I love it. He put out a tweet yesterday.
I remember if somebody tagged me in or if it just popped up in my
feet. I think actually I follow Greg
Abbott 'cause I'm curious what's going on in Texas.
This is something that kind of I was aware of because of an
interview we did from our Sunday sit down session.
More on that in a second as well, because we've got a really
good one coming up for this Sunday.
Someone you've never heard of, I promise you.
Well, most of you never heard family members have if you
listen to the show, but we've got a, we've got a discussion
here. This is Greg Abbott tweeting out
that the Texas Funeral Service Commission, I'm not crazy about
government overreach. I'm certainly not crazy about
state control over funeral homes per SE.
But they sent a cease and desist letter to the epic compound.
Yes, I'm aware that there's an epic compound.
Yes, I'm aware that a Muslim organization has bought 405
supposedly acres and is developing something and trying
to have a self-contained Sharia law city.
I don't think it's that dangerous, mostly because
they're aware of it at the state level.
And 405 acres in the state of Texas is like a drop in a
massive, massive bucket. He says they are knowingly
breaking state law in many ways, including operating funeral
homes without a license. This is a crime, won't be
tolerated. He has a little press release
down there about the East Plano Islamic Center and the fact
they're going to try to shut down this Funeral Home.
I've seen some conservatives push back and say, hey, state,
why don't you stay the hell out of the business of people who
want to run a business. And normally I would agree with
you, but there's a problem when it comes to the some of the
things that the federal government and the state
government and your local government actually get involved
in. One of the things, even though
we agree here, this is a standard position that
government is the worst solution to all problems, even when it's
the only solution to the problem.
This is my general and standing thesis.
When you have a group of people, particularly a Funeral Home,
hospitals are the other one that is going to issue death
certificates. There's money involved in that.
And I'm not talking about permitting to put a body into
the ground. I'm talking about the discussion
that I had with my buddy Peter Johnson about when he was a cop
in Minnesota and how none of the cops had ever been to a natural
cause of death call, a dead on arrival call for members of the
Somali community. And that they they believed that
there was significant amounts of fraud to the tune of government
benefits. That means Social Security
payments continued on because if you don't file a death
certificate and it doesn't get recorded with the state, which
rolls up to the federal government, they keep paying
those Social Security checks. They keep paying pension checks,
death benefits, whatever else are skipped.
And you just keep seeing checks written out.
So if you're a Muslim group, then you've identified that a
weakness in the US system and you bring in a bunch of people
that don't have American culture and American customs and don't
have American ethnicity. They don't have an American
citizenship, a lot of them. And then you bring them in here,
you naturalize them in, and you want people to live on
generationally on Social Security from somebody else that
died and you don't want to report it.
This is the scam that has to be looked into.
So Governor Abbott getting involved in that.
I do like it for that very reason.
While we're talking about Texas stuff, before we do our next
sponsor, I just wanted to give you guys a political ad.
As I said, I'm kind of keeping an eye on things happening in
Texas and this is always troubling.
We saw yesterday Donald Trump go out and endorse Lindsey Graham.
I despise Lindsey Graham. I think the people of South
Carolina need to figure it out. I get it that you have open
primaries. I get it that Democrats can come
in and vote on behalf of Lindsey Graham because he might as well
be on their team, but something needs to go down.
We need a strong contender in there.
The second thing is in Texas, and I'm not going to be the guy.
Don't ask me to run for Senate. I have no interest in being part
of that. But somebody needs to run out
there. So find me the, the, the good,
the the best candidate to take down John Cornyn, who's scum.
He's doing this awful little thing.
Like look how MAGA I am. So here's a John Cornyn ad.
Do not fall for this stuff, folks.
This is a more Texas politics. It matters because even though
we have a A2 Republican Congress people, Senate seats, one of
them Ted Cruz, the other one John Cornyn, is he really a
Republican in any meaningful way?
Can he just retire and go be a bootleg John Lithgow somewhere
else? Here he is in President Trump's
first term. He made America great.
The unemployment rate is at its lowest in 50 years and markets
are at all time highs and GDP is growing.
And Texas Senator John Cornyn had his back.
And we're especially grateful to your wonderful Senators John
Cornyn and Ted Cruz. This is John Cornyn.
It's an honor to represent Texas in the US Senate in President
Trump's first term. I was Republican whip,
delivering the votes for his biggest wins.
Yeah. Yeah.
And then I was totally not with him because it wasn't really
expedient for me. But now I'm back with him
because he's back in the office. And if I need to run on MAGA
because that's how it's going to get me into office.
And that's what I'm going to keep doing because I'm 1000
years old and I don't know what else to do.
I don't want to retire and go be around my family.
Gross, dude. Just awful.
Get. Let's get John Cornyn out of
there. That's very much a position
piece, but I'm telling you, while I was thinking about
Texas, I thought about that. All right, let's let's talk
about one of our sponsors. This one is going to be for
silent. I just put all my stuff in.
Actually, I've got 2 phones in there.
You guys know one of the reasons why I know these Faraday
products are really important, especially at my desk because
I've got really high end monitors that their speakers
that play the sound so I can kind of mix things together and
I can actually hear incoming RF distortions on a regular basis.
They all cease when I put my bag into the silent Faraday bag.
So for whatever it's worth, they work really, really well.
And if you're around electronic, you might as well have one of
these. Doesn't matter whether it's big
government, big tech, corporate America, criminals.
Maybe you're working on sensitive electronics.
You want to make sure you keep those signals.
You want your privacy uncompromised 24/7.
You have to protect yourself. You can block all these things
by using a silent Faraday product.
They do block all incoming and outgoing signals.
I can attest to it. I literally leave my phone on
top of a on top of a monitor that tells me if it's getting
signals and I can. I can always hear it if you want
to make your devices invisible and say from the outside world,
if you want to stop them from flooding you with this kind of
stuff, You can always get their backpacks, their phone sleeves,
they even make a pair of pants that does it.
They do have a patented RF signal to blocking technology.
They work really well. I bought the cheap stuff from
Amazon when I was working in the FBII don't recommend them at
all. You can save money, but you're
also going to have something at leaks.
They always do Inevitably these don't.
I've tested them. I've tested them across many
miles on Texas highways. They work against the same stuff
that we used to do when I was working in counterintelligence.
We would test these things and it's almost back in the day, all
we would use is a is is tinfoil and an ammo can.
These are much more elegant looking, especially if you go to
like a business meeting. Go to slnt.com/K YLE.
Save yourself 15% again, silent.com slash Kyle saves you
15% plus you'll get free shipping on on your qualifying
orders. You want to stay ahead of what's
coming. You want to secure your privacy
today. If you're worried about EM PS or
any of your devices, They make all kinds of different stuff,
military compliant things, Berry compliant.
If you need it made in the United States, you could choose
your poison there. You can choose whether you want
to have it overseas a little bit cheaper.
You can have it made in America if you're that guy and you can
get it stepped up. silent.com slnt.com/K YLE link in the show
description as usual. Let's do a couple of other
little things Our Sunday special.
I don't usually tease them out my our Sunday sit down.
I don't always tease these out. I talked to a guy named Cameron
Smith. We just taped it yesterday.
I wanted to show you what it looks like, what we're going to
be talking about because when I saw these, I I immediately
wanted to talk to him. I saw a kindred spirit and since
we've got another Texas congressperson that's on this
one, I just going to give you kind of a visual.
If you guys have not seen this, go to our Spotify, go to Rumble
or go to YouTube and check out the visuals for the show at
about 30 minutes in and you'll see these are some of the
trading cards, the playing cards for this game that he's created.
This one is eye patch McCain, which you may recognize as a
very similar to Dan Crenshaw looking figure that sweet rhino
magic. And then it gives you some of
the abilities. These are trading cards that are
both kind of funny. They're a great joke.
They would make a great gift. But additionally, there's
actually a game there which we're going to talk about and,
and we get into in the the Sunday sit down interview, which
ends to be just kind of like 2 guys riffing on funny stuff.
You can see there's Alec Jones, quite funny to be honest.
He's kind of retarded. I sent this actually to Alex
Jones yesterday and he said he wants to have him on the show as
well because it's just really funny.
It's clever. It's stuff that if you pay
attention to the news, yeah, it's a real specific kind of
audience, but it's an opportunity to radicalize maybe
your teen children. It's an opportunity to have kind
of a, a beverage, like an adult beverage, sit down and play a
card. I see this as being Magic the
Gathering or a Pokémon or something like that, which I
didn't play those, but that crossed with like a cards
against you humanity. And for those of us that are
into the political sphere that we actually want to talk about
things that are ongoing. You want to have interesting
conversations, but also have a a sense of, of humor about it.
This is some of it. These are two other cards that
he sent me. These are the these are the the
transparent ones or the what do they call them?
Holographic cards. These are collectibles.
You could put this on your desk and just like be a conversation
piece. This one is Cornpop.
He's a hero card. Leave this kids alone talking
about petting the hair at the at the pool.
Freaking hilarious. And then Representative Omar
Brotherly, love, if you know, you know, these things are all
inside jokes for conservatives that have been paying attention
to what goes on in the news cycle.
So giving you kind of a little preview of what we're going to
get into. I think it's fun.
I think you guys will get a kick out of it.
And it's the opposite of what we're going to talk about next,
which is the woke nonsense that exists at NPR.
We just, we just can't get away from it.
So here you go. The woke boss of NPR was
squirming and backtracking in Congress as she's grilled about
calls for whites to pay for reparations.
These these theatrical hearings are a little bit troubling.
This is coming from the Daily Mail, so from folks overseas.
More on overseas stuff in a minute.
Her name is Catherine Mayer. We've played clips of her
before, if you guys are familiar.
She's pretty. She's a tall, blonde, pretty
well spoken white lady who talks about the most woke leftist
garbage. This is like Steve friends
enemy. I'm sure she goes to brunch with
her lady friends and wishes that she could convert her kid into a
transgender person. That's just my guess from
listening to NPR over the years, and they have gotten more and
more focused on trans and gay nonsense to the point where one
would have to assume, I think I actually said this to Alex
Jones, that if you listen to NPR, you would believe that 60%
of the world has a gender that is not matching their born
gender and they have a sexual orientation that is not
heterosexual. You would think that if you
listen to NPR, it wasn't always like that.
They were always on the left. But it's kind of funny.
So the question came up, is there political bias at NPR?
And of course, this woman who has spent a lifetime, she's the
CEO over there. She's the she's the person that
runs it all. She got owned by Jim Jordan,
which is not hard. Jim Jordan does a pretty good
job in hearings. That's his that's his Olympic
sport. And then also by freshman
Congressman Brandon Gill. And I know Brandon a little bit.
We work together on police state.
I coached him in some of the acting roles.
Brandon's a really, really, really sharp guy and he's Dinesh
D'souza's son-in-law. So that's also relevant.
He's representing Texas, so there's another Texas win there.
And he's a good, he's a, he's really good at this.
I mean, he comes in, he comes from a sort of journalistic
background from, from running a, a website that did that for a
while. So he is also just like the
folks we should send him some of these training cards.
He knows all of these little inside scoops.
He's got his staff working really well to pull all the
great quotes and they're doing the things that the leftist
always try to do, jamming you up for your own words.
He's just making these people deal with like the Saul Alinsky,
you know, make them face their own standards.
And it's really fun to watch. So we'll start off with Jim
Jordan talking about the question.
Just a real simple setup. Is there political bias at NPR?
And, of course, her denial. And then we'll get into Brandon
Gill in a second, crushing her down, which is really enjoyable,
too. So Jim Jordan first.
Former senior business editor for NPR.
How long do you work at NPR? I believe he was there just over
25 years. 25 years award-winning journalist.
Did you win any awards? I our time to.
Peabody Award. That's pretty important, isn't
it? A pretty distinguished
journalist, right? Certainly.
And I wrote, he wrote a long story about what you do at NPR.
Is NPR biased? Congressman, I have never seen
any instance of never of political bias determining
editorial decisions, no. Well, Miss Burt, Mr. Berliner in
his story a couple last year wrote.
I've in the DC area editorial positions at NPR.
He said he found 87 registered Democrats, 0 Republicans.
Is that accurate? We do not track the numbers or
the voter registration, but I find that.
Was a war winning journalist who worked 25 years at NPR Mr.
Berliner? Was he lying when he wrote that?
I am not presuming such. I just don't have.
We don't track that information about our journalists. 87 to 0
and you're not biased. I think that is concerning if
those numbers are accurate. Yeah, it is a little concerning,
isn't it? Wouldn't you be worried about
that? OK, fine.
That's fun. And then and then we get to the
real setup, which is that she's just a goofy lady who has the
most woke, stupid ideas that you could ever have.
Here's Brandon Gill just leveling this poor woman who,
you know, she's very polished when she speaks, is she not?
I mean, you can hear her. She's very comfortable lying
because she's been paid to do this for a long time.
This is the space she operates in.
That's what propaganda operators look like.
And so here we have Brandon Gill laying it out, reading some of
the tweets that she just is like, no, I don't recall that.
This is classic. This is what they do on the
hearings. That's why these things don't
actually mean that much. But it is great for a sound
bite. It's nice to see a freshman
congressman coming in and starting with the fire and not
pretending to be someone like Jasmine Crockett.
Maybe a little to that in a second too.
Miss Maher, I I want to start from with you.
Just generally, would you say you generally agree or disagree
with the following statement? The history of all hitherto
existing society is the history of class struggles.
I would not say I agree with that.
That's good to hear. It's it's interesting because a
lot of your thinking, as expressed by your public
statement, is deeply infused with economic and cultural
Marxism. Do you believe that America is
addicted to white supremacy? I believe that I tweeted that
and I, as I've said earlier, I believe much of my thinking has
evolved over the last half decade.
It has evolved. Why did you tweet that?
I don't recall the exact context Sir, so I wouldn't be able to
say. OK, Do you believe that America
believes in black plunder and white democracy?
I don't believe that, Sir. You tweeted that in reference to
a book you were reading at the time.
Apparently, the case for reparations.
I don't think I've ever read that book, Sir.
You. Tweeted about it.
You said. You took a day off to fully read
the case for reparations. You put that on Twitter in
January of 2020. I apologize, I don't recall that
I did. No doubt that yours your tweet
there is correct, but I don't recall that.
Do you believe that white people and inherently feel superior to
other races? I do not.
You don't you? You tweeted something to that
effect. You said I I grew up feeling
superior. Ha.
How wide of me? Why did you tweet that?
I think I was probably reflecting on what it was to be
to grow up in an environment where I had lots of advantages.
It it sounds like you're saying that white people feel superior.
I I don't believe that anybody feels that way, Sir.
I was just reflecting on my own experiences.
She was just reflecting on her own experiences of feeling
superior. It's pretty good.
He skewers her to this. I'll post this over on on local
so you guys can see it as well. I think it's one of the really
good takedowns. And of course it was it was
shared around as one of those viral moments.
But good for him as a as a freshman congressman just coming
in. I want to see good people do
good things. I was cautiously optimistic that
he'd do a good job and he's really holding a lot of feats in
the fire, so good for him. If you guys want to support us
you're seeing over there, you could be on rumble.com/kyle
Seraphin. We may be suppressed, but we are
still going to be here live at 0930.
If you guys want to watch the program live, it's an option for
you. You can also watch us over on
YouTube where it's youtube.com slash at Kyle Serif and you got
to put the ad sign in there. So if you want to do that, you
can also find X the same way. Our locals channels where we
have a subscriber base. And if you want to support the
program financially, you can totally do that.
And we really appreciate it. You get a couple of perks like
you get our our show a little bit early and you have your own
private chat there. We do a call in show on Thursday
nights, which we'll do here. And then lastly, Spotify, Kyle
serifandshow.com. You saw it on the screen.
You guys can go there and go to kyleserifandshow.com.
It'll take you directly to our Spotify link.
It's just a cheat code for it. And if you wanted to share that
with a friend, hey, check out a Kyle Serif and show episode.
You can take them right to the main page there.
Lastly, if you guys will like and share and make sure you're
subscribing, we always appreciate that.
It's a big deal here. If everybody shared one time to
one person who actually went in there and and looked at it, we
double our audience and I think that'd be good.
We're touching stories that not everybody is touching on.
I think that's what's useful. We're not going to get sucked
into the mainstream media drama all the time.
And mostly what I'd like to do is just debunk that stuff.
So I hope you guys appreciate that that let's go and say
thanks to our friends over at my Patriot Supply as well.
While I'm thinking about it, folks, this is the the offer
they have right now. I love this offer because it
gives you a lot of flexibility. It's a 72 hour food pack.
You get four of them for free when you buy the one month food
pack. OK.
When disaster strikes, the first thing that happens is grocery
stores get emptied. Usually it happens overnight.
The worst time to prepare for any emergency is going to be in
the aftermath. It's already too late by that
time. Smart Americans, they do trust
My Patriot Supply to help them prepare before the crisis.
We always say prepare so you don't have to repair.
Prepare like kyle.com is the website.
If you go there, they're making it easier than ever.
You can get the four week emergency food kit.
You'll get 4 free 72 hour food kits along with it, almost two
weeks of free bonus meals. That means you can scatter them
around the places you want, vehicles, go bags, and so on.
You can stash them at locations you might want to run out to,
like your cabin in the woods or your secondary home or whatever.
With each of these kits, you're going to get 2000 calories per
day. The meals are easy to prepare.
They last for up to 25 years, so you have Peace of Mind that you
don't have to use them right away.
You just hold on to them. It's an insurance policy that
you hold on to there. There's no last minute panic
buying. There's no empty shelves you
have to worry about. You know you got food available
to you. Stock up now before the deal
disappears. You can get them if emergency
hits, it's going to be too late already.
Prepare again. That that keyword prepare like
kyle.com show notes. We'll have it again.
Prepare like kyle.com. You can claim the four free 72
hour food kits plus you can get that one month.
Check them out. This is a good this is a good
deal. I like this one because it's an
entry level and it also gives you a couple of pieces of
flexibility. Prepare like kyle.com.
I'm going to carry on here. Let's see, I got some other fun
stuff in here. I had Trump talking about Ashley
Babbitt and I think this is interesting because again, we're
re adjudicating a lot of stuff from the from the last
administration, January 6th that happened on Trump's first term.
There's a lot of wrongs that haven't been fixed.
Again, I'm focusing in on Congress people that suck.
We've got some new blood in there.
I'm focusing in on stuff that's happening in the state of Texas
for some reason. There's a lot of that going on.
And then we're getting this sort of like we have to re adjudicate
January 6th. We have to re look at Crossfire
Hurricane, which he just did the the declassification on.
Trump is talking about Ashley Babbitt in an interview and
seems to hold the same opinion that I do.
The interviewer here, I was from, I think, Newsmax, and he's
staying something very simple. This was not a justifiable
shoot. So we watched weaponized
government cover up for itself, as you'd expect.
Trump is actually talking in about how, yeah, we got to look
into this kind of stuff. We can't just let these things
slide. And he's kind of saying that
they want to investigate it. I would love for this to be the
case because there should be justice for it, just like there
should be justice for my friend Garrett O'boyle.
He was investigated improperly by the FBI, found that he didn't
do the thing that they said, and he still hasn't been hired back
in the same way that he got to make right by the rest of the
FBI. Whistleblowers, we're already
seeing it over at the IRS. It needs to be done here.
Obviously, I benefit from that. But more importantly, America,
if you want people to come forward and call out
malfeasance, you can't let these people just disappear into the
ether. So we're going to hit that real
quick. Here's Trump talking about
Ashley Babbitt. I just think this is a useful
clip to tells you about mindset. Ashley Babbitt.
It was a bad shooting, My father being terrible.
Anybody. It's a terrible thing.
I don't know if you know this, but the Department of Justice
right now is still kind of fighting that case.
The family of Ashley Babbitt is suing the government wrongful
death. The DOJ right now officially is
still opposing that lawsuit, trying to justify it.
Shouldn't that be something that can just be settled at this
point? Well, I'll look into that.
I mean, you're just telling me that for the first time.
I haven't heard that. I'm a big fan of Ashley Babbitt,
OK. And Ashley Babbitt was a really
good person who was a big MAGA fan, Trump fan.
And she was innocently standing there, they even say, trying to
sort of hold back the crowd. And a man did something to her
that was unthinkable when he shot her.
And I think it's a disgrace. I'm going to look into that.
I did not know that, no. And the officer who shot her,
Michael Byrd, is still on duty. They gave him a raise and they
gave him a medal and I believe a promotion.
I think it's a disgrace. He's a federal employee.
Would you? Yeah, he is a federal employee.
The problem is he works for Congress, folks.
That's what the issue is here. And so Congress having a law
enforcement branch, it's always been a problem. the US Capitol
Police, I don't understand how they exist.
They should have zero law enforcement authorities, not
real crazy about them being able to carry a gun.
Maybe you put them under the city of DC there.
There's a problem here when you have executive authorities that
have vested in Congress. This is a conflict.
This is an actual constitutional crisis.
It's not all doom and gloom. It's not all sadness.
I wanted to play you one funny clip right now in the middle
while we're going because we can kind of heavy we're kind of
talking heavy on civil rights and this kind of thing.
This is something I thought was quite funny.
This is Donald Trump talking about fertility has nothing to
do with anything else out there other than he said he was going
to push forward more babies and IVF.
I'm not a big fan of that either.
I think IVF is actually pretty evil.
Even those of you who are conceived by that or that was
the only way you could have a baby that God's plan is far more
important. I also think that it opens up
the door for abuse. It opens the door for that thing
we talked about earlier where gay couples can go in and buy a
baby and surrogacy, and there's a lot of nasty things that come
in with the undercurrent. It sounds good on paper right up
until you get to the point where there's designer babies being
bought by people who ought not to have them, including people
celebrated by the right like Dave Rubin.
I don't want that for for the babies because what it means is
that you're not thinking about another person, you're actually
thinking about yourself. Narcissism always ends up badly
anyway. Donald Trump has a moment of
self reflection where he calls himself the fertilization
president. And it's really funny to me.
It's just like a really human moment.
Sometimes you just say something out loud and you're like, crap,
I'm going to own it. And he does.
This is the charm. I think that people see
personally with a Donald Trump that he can kind of laugh at
himself. So he does this.
He gets a, he gets a belly laugh from the whole room, regardless
of what side of the political aisle you're on.
This is just kind of charming. Even if I don't like the
politics that are being discussed, I do like this.
This makes me kind of smile. It makes me think, OK, maybe
it'll all be all right. You're doing great on it and
we're going to have tremendous, tremendous goodies in the bag
for women too. The women between the
fertilization and all of the other things that we're talking
about, it's going to be it's going to be great.
We're joined today fertilization.
I'm I'm still very proud of it. I don't care.
I'll be known as the fertilization president.
That that's OK. That's not bad.
I've I've been called.
I've been called much worse. Actually.
I like it, right? I like it.
Thank you. Like I was just smiling.
I was listening to it. I wasn't even paying attention.
I heard him go like, actually I gotta like it, you know, like
whatever the fertilization president and he's buddy with
Elon, the other fertilization king out there making babies
left and right. So yeah, you know, Trump's got
babies. He cares about babies.
I think that's funny. I think being called the
fertilization president, you could do a lot worse.
They've called him Nazi and a fascist and literally Hitler and
all the other terrible things. So anyway, that's such a regular
thing to do. I, I got a little tear coming
out of my eye cause a baby. It's just good.
It's, it's so human. It's a real thing.
And that's the opposite of what you see with these other people.
Anyway, I want to go to like this like fake scandal that's
going on that continues to be rolling.
I want to do a contrast for you here.
The contrast is media outrage talking about the signal
scandal, the signal gate, all this BS.
I am still firmly in the camp of this is not a real scandal that
this was an operation that was set up and I, and here's why.
Number one, I see 0 reactions. I don't see anybody throwing a
thumbs up emoji or like 100 bro or whatever that people do.
That is how men have, no matter, serious or otherwise.
I have worked with people in the national security sphere.
I have worked with politicians, I have worked with journalists
and reporters. Regular people respond and react
on social media and on Signal chats and group chats on
iMessage differently than they do in like their professional
life where they are typing up or having minute meetings of a
memo. I've also seen some some of
these AI models analyze this conversation.
One of them said, somebody tweeted at me, I get it.
They said 80% chance this was scripted, that it stays within
the verbal parameters of the way these people talk.
But also, it really looks like it's trying to imitate it.
The only thing that's going to convince me that this was a
legitimate mistake, and I'm not even sure that that even does,
is if they decide to fire Mike Waltz, which has been discussed
for some reason. People are talking about Pete
Hegseth. Here is the here's the case
against Pete Hegseth, which is really an interesting take a guy
who apparently didn't set up the group who dropped this into the
group. And then we're going to debunk
it because as as I said, it's a media talking point round, which
means it's a leftist political talking point to Pete existed
the following team update time now 11:44 ET.
Weather is favorable. Just confirmed with CENTCOM.
We're a go for the mission. Then you've got 1215 ETF
eighteen strike or launch. Then you've got 1345 trigger
based says that there's a strike window opens terrorist target at
his known location should be on time drone strike launch and
they say the type of drone. None of these are are specific
vehicles. These are none of these are
specific tail numbers. None of these are specific call
signs. None of these are telling you
the routes. They're not telling you the
locations. They're not telling you the
spins, the frequencies under which they're going to contact
each other. They're not telling you the the
combo plan or any of the contingencies.
You don't have the the pace acronym primary alternate
contingency emergency comms. You've got no drop deadline
where they might have an abort plan.
They don't have anything on here that this is like sort of like a
rough outline of like what we're going to do.
And by the way, none of this stuff is confirmable until after
it happens. You'd be batshit crazy as a
journalist to publish this. This is one of those things that
continues to look to me. It continues to look like
someone set them up, set up the Atlantic to run this thing where
now we are talking about Signal and how we feel about Europe and
whether or not the Houthis are serious as a fighting force.
By the way, interesting. Speaking of propaganda.
And NPR found this on the other propaganda outlet, Voice of
America. UN experts say that Iran has
transferred Yemen's Houthi rebels into a potent military
force. No mention by the way of anti
aircraft capabilities. They've got, you know, machine
guns and they've got like abilities to go and strike ships
sort of unless we decide to thwack them.
So my buddy George Hill referred to it.
So you've got like maybe a fraggo is what they would call
this is a fragment of an order, but it's not even a fraggo
because it has no specifics to able to launch it.
So that doesn't stop these people from talking about it.
In fact, in the middle of the hearing that Cash Patel was hit,
they said, are you going to open up an investigation, Sir, into
this leaked classified material? I'm going to give you even more
on that in a second. Patel just smashes this down
again. We're doing smashes and hearing.
So here it is. Another day has passed.
You actually was the night before the hearing.
Now that another day has passed, you believe that it's now time
potentially for the FBI to open an investigation into this.
I'm not going to comment on that because you're the director of
the FBI. You don't believe it's
appropriate to comment on that because there's a process in
place, there's an ongoing litigation, and the National
Security Council is reviewing this matter.
And I'm not going to discuss any open or closed investigation.
Ongoing investigation. Literally the lawsuit happened
today or yesterday afternoon. And the idea that you don't have
an opinion on this at this point is frustrating to me.
No, it's not. I'm not going to prejudge any
matters. And the men and women of the FBI
will reclaim all the balls and strikes claiming my time.
Not you, Sir. I, Mr. Chairman, I'd.
Gentleman's recognized you have 4 seconds remaining.
No, I have more than that, gentleman.
'S time has expired. You got 4 seconds, you have two
seconds as you complain. Piss off.
We're moving on. What he said is they're going to
call balls and strikes. That's fair.
Listen, this is an issue that is going to be very complicated by
something that was passed under Barack Obama or signed into law.
One of the last things we're going to talk about is executive
orders and the hundreds of them that the 100 plus that Donald
Trump has signed in, in the beginning of the Barack Obama
administration in 2009, there was an update to an executive
order. It was 13526.
Go out and read it yourself, 13526.
And then the question about Espionage Act, which is what
everyone's talking about, what it says specifically in the
Espionage Act is that you cannot pass National Defense material,
classified material, etcetera, etcetera, to people who are not
authorized persons. That's the, the letter and the,
and the verbiage of the statute. The problem with the Executive
Order 13526 is it tells you who has the ability to authorize to,
to classify and declassify. And that means that the
president and the vice president basically have the exhaustive
authority under the executive, but it's also been subjugated to
information that belongs in the purview of agency heads and
department heads. In other words, cabinet level
people and folks that are the head of their particular agency.
If there's classified material that originates and is
derivatively classified underneath that particular
agency, think National Geospatial agency, right?
NGA, they're a map based agency. They do Geo int or, or a
geographic intelligence or a geospatial intelligence.
Those people they could actually classify or declassify.
And I don't know how big the process is, but at the end of
the day, the process is just policy.
It doesn't mean that it's necessarily force of law.
The executive branch determines what is and what is not
classified. So you can read someone in.
You could not read someone in. They do this all the damn time,
folks. There's a thing that's called
Pam. I'm going to just educate you
very quickly. When you want to run a really
good double operation, when you want to run somebody against
the, they, they think that they have penetrated the United
States government. We're going to turn around and
run that person against the country that seems that they
penetrated us. This idea of Pam or also known
as passage material is that they quietly declassify things that
were otherwise classified. They can leave classified
markings on them. They can make it look legitimate
in order to run an operation to smoke people out as moles, in
order to pass fake information that is now outdated.
It's it's previously classified or currently classified, but it
is, but it is outdated material. They can use it for all kinds of
things to be able to establish bona fides to get false
information, as George Hill called it, haversacking, where
you're basically dropping a bag or a knapsack full of documents
that we owe. Gosh, that the enemy found it or
this journalist happened to be part of it.
A digital haversacking operation is very, very likely in this
case only because they're never going to confirm it, which we'll
find out. If they don't confirm that, that
there was a mistake made, and I'm talking about confirm
through actions like getting rid of people, then you look at who
was on there. The journalist was the last guy
to be added. It looks scripted.
He couldn't run anything until after the fact and even funnier
when he decided to run something.
Here's Goldberg saying the should that we got.
Sorry, I didn't say it that way. The things that we got were too
classified. We could never show them the
American people. We would compromise those
people. We care so much about the
military. Sure.
The Atlantic, you really care about the military only when it
hurts Trump. And then a couple days later
they're like, by the way, here's all the Signal chat.
We're going to put it out there in the world.
Here we go. Didn't publish this.
And I continue not to publish it because it felt like it was too
confidential, too principled, technical.
And I worry, honestly, that sharing that kind of information
in in public could endanger American military person three
days later. At a certain point, you have to
let the citizens of America just look and, and, and and
understand what what's going on. And that certain point was three
days later, dude. OK, cool.
I get it. Yeah, that must make sense.
That's why you got guys like Ted Lieu, who's not a very honest
operator working out of California.
We got 2 California types out of here, too.
We had Kevin Kiley earlier who was asking the reasonable
questions to Dan Goldman about, hey, how come you don't talk
about concealed carry holders? Same thing.
Now you've got Ted Lieu. He's the other side of the coin
in California, representing the majority of California, which is
really bad takes. Apparently Pete Hagseth has to
resign because somebody, quote, UN quote, accidentally added
this journalist who was totally scrupulous and would never
publish anything but suddenly published it three days later.
Here we go. Secretary of Defense Pete Hexat
should resign. He recklessly texted operational
details of military strikes, including time, place, location,
and sequencing of those strikes to a journalist.
Had that information gotten to the Houthis, American pilots
could have been shot down. Navy sailors could have been
targeted. His reckless actions endangered
the lives of American troops, endanger a national security and
makes it so that our allies don't want to share sensitive
classified information with us. Any who freaking who Voice of
America again, Iran is making the Yemen Houthi rebels into a
very potent military force. We have to believe that they're
super capable even though they don't have anti aircraft
capabilities, even though our fighters flew in there with no
specifics. You want to know the the final
take on this one as far as I can tell.
Were there any names? Were there any specifics?
Were there any targets? Was this actually something
classified? There's actually a thing that
has to be included for it to actually fall into the fully
classified realm. People talk around, whether you
like it or not, whether they should do it or not.
People talk around classified material all the time without
getting specific, without specifics.
Often times the material itself is not in fact classified.
It's the sources or methods that indicate how that information
was gathered. Saying it is no big deal.
How you got it might be classified because you were
doing a signal intercept. You were listening in on a phone
call between two people. And by telling people the
information you got, which is just stuff that's being
discussed in an open air market the way that you got it because
you had some satellite, you know, dropping in and reading
lips or whatever the hell. You were using shotgun mics from
outside and you had some undercover source.
That is the way that you would actually expose and that's why
it's actually sensitive. This is a real simple thing.
Do we have any specifics? Tulsi Gabbard debunking this.
I think this is the definitive answer.
Again, I'm not a cheerleader for the Trump administration.
You'll know I'll I'll tell them when they're wrong, especially
on guns. But this one seems stupid and
it's really funny that they're so distracted by it.
Were there any names in the single chat?
No. Any targets?
No. Any locations?
No. Was there a unit name or
location of that unit? There was not.
Were there any routes described in the single chat?
No. Wouldn't an operational plan
contain that type of information?
Every operational plan I've ever seen has contained that
information. Thank you.
Shifting to the real threats to America, the southern border.
I really like those, I like it when they end with the cheers,
but seriously, is that not a mic drop moment?
They can't let it go, they're going to be distracted by it.
This does seem to be the reason why you would do this in the 1st
place, at least to me. Caitlin Collins, who is
definitely not Scott Pressler and definitely not a man.
Caitlin, I don't think she actually is a man.
I think Caitlin Collins is totally woman based on seeing
her previously when she worked the Daily Caller.
I do think that she's gotten like full lefty.
She's now aspiring to be the CEO of NPR, basically, like we just
saw Catherine Mayer, but here she is talking to Doug Collins.
They're supposed to be talking about Veterans Affairs.
She can't help herself. She just can't help herself.
She needs to get an answer from a cabinet member about this
signal thing. If this was the purpose in the
in the end, they're doing a great job of getting them
distracted about something that matters not at all.
Do you believe that a mistake was made here though to have
this conversation, to add a reporter and to have it on an
unsupported, you know, classified group setting?
Caitlin, as I've just told you, I've just answered the question.
I wasn't part of it. And, you know, I'm not going to
speculate more than what the President's already talked about
and those who've been involved have talked about, but would
love to talk about the veterans. Yeah.
And I do have questions about the the veterans, but given what
we saw with the the group chat and how this was used, you are a
member of the Cabinet. You obviously know these other
members, several of them who were in there.
Is this typical for the cabinet to have conversations over
Signal? Is this something that you use?
Well, Caitlin and send you undoubtedly do not want to talk
about the VAI have a question as VA secretary is cabinet.
I want to ask you because I've been curious about this because
my job is to take care of veterans and I would like to
know why CNN is hostile to veterans, especially one in
Florida where you just had a $5,000,000 defamation suit
taking offense at a veteran who was trying to help people.
In fact, one of your employees actually said we're going to
nail him. I have a question for you,
Caitlin. Is that employee still employed?
Are you really concerned about veterans?
So if we don't want to talk about ventures, now you want to
talk about everything else? I'd like to hear from CNN as the
veteran Cabinet secretary, why CNN seems to have a problem I.
Don't know why, I just like watching her go like someones
hitting me in the face on my own show.
I don't like this. It does make for some pretty
good TV when somebody turns around on you.
I do love being on in interviews and then turning around and
interviewing the the person who's interviewing me.
That's sometimes fun. And I usually don't get into
hostile interviews because people don't want to jump in
with me. Maybe they just like I don't
have a high enough profile. I would enjoy it.
I think interviews and and conversation like that can be a
blood sport. So that's pretty fun.
But let's put it up here. What are they not talking about?
They're not talking about tariffs, which we were hearing
about being the dumbest thing and the scariest thing and oh so
bad. Donald Trump's going to have
tariffs. God forbid we have that happen.
The 25% tariffs are coming in on 4 and cars, by the way, that's
not going to affect almost any car that most Americans buy.
I was looking for a car. Mercedes makes cars here, BMW
makes cars here. If they make them overseas and
you want to pay more money, OK, there it goes.
Then you have to pay more. Ferrari, Bugatti, Lamborghini,
Maserati. If you want to buy a super high
end luxury car, you probably don't care about paying 25%
more. You're buying it not because you
need the performance, but because you want to have a
status symbol. OK, your status symbol just got
more expensive and you can pay down some of the debt.
But if you're buying a a Japanese import, most of them
are made in the United States, which is the whole point of this
stuff. Bring these things in
domestically. Have the things that are made
domestically be shielded incentivize businesses to bring
and invest here. There's been several movements
by car manufacturers from overseas to to put actual new
facilities in the United States because of these of late like
them. Note they have announced one I
just missed it. I can't remember who was it was
Kia or Honda, Hyundai or something like that.
Just built a brand new, a brand new plant where announced plans
to build a plant, brand new plant, which means American
jobs, American manufacturing. It defends American people in
the middle class who have mobility.
And so you're not hearing them talk about this and demonizing
that. I think all that is like this
seems to be the problem. The news media is easily
distracted. So they go with that.
And then of course they either do that or they do the emotional
appeal. I just ran down another story.
This is from NBC and I found this to be quite interesting as
well. Things that are not being talked
about that much because you can't hear about it.
But how about the people on at ICE are now on track to
basically get rid of at least a million if they continue at the
same pace for the next 4 years. That's not nothing.
Deporting 1,000,000 people. I'd like to see more.
And so would you. And so that's why you have these
crying things coming from NBC. This is a big deal.
A man has been detained by ICE for more than two years, claims
his US citizen is a quote, UN quote nightmare.
His name is Mario Renee Lopez. He's being held at a facility in
Virginia. Said that he obtained
citizenship as a minor from his mom, who was naturalized in
1998. And then in the first paragraph,
I identified, sorry, the second paragraph, I identified
something. It looks like it's a problem.
And I ran it by my friends over at CIS.
And they're like, yeah, there's a lot of stuff you have to ask.
By the way, this guy is a convicted criminal.
He spent 7. Years in prison.
So he's not like the guy that I want to go to go to bad for.
Again, you're making the mainstream media defend
criminals or people that have been, you know, at least
convicted of crimes that came here potentially illegally.
Here's the funny story, 2 paragraphs.
I'll just read it to you right away.
I see problems with it. It's called derivative
citizenship. That's the the process that he's
claiming. It means that your parent was
naturalized and therefore you are also naturalized.
But the key is where were you living?
What was your resident status and what was going on when that
parent was in fact naturalized. They make a bunch of analogies
here, but they don't handle the specifics of why DOJ is going
after this. Here's what it says.
Maya Renee Lopez is being locked up in an ICE detention facility.
Very hard to experience because he can't be with his family.
The conditions are tough. But above it all, it's very hard
because he insists that he's AUS citizen quote, came to the
United States when I was 12 years old with a permanent
residence because my mother was a legal resident and she put in
the papers and then came in to pick me up in El Salvador.
His mom was naturalized in 1998 when he was like 16 years old.
Then she went to El Salvador and brought him back here.
As I understand it, it's quite simple.
You actually have to be in the United States when your parent
is naturalized if you want to get the sort of derivative and
then you have to ask for it. You have to actually file
paperwork and make it happen. My mom became a citizen.
I was a minor. I automatically got derivative
citizenship from my mother for no reason.
I'm being detained. That's not really how the system
works there, chief. OK, for whatever it's worth, ICE
detained multiple times. There are all kinds of
situations. Automatic acquisition of
citizenship by parents. There's nothing that happens
automatic in the government. Imagine this.
Any of you who have ever gotten a government document, how about
you had ADD 214 because you got out of the military, You
automatically are supposed to get it, but many of you don't.
I didn't get it. I had to go ask for ADD 214.
And then when you get it, it automatically shows up and it's
wrong and it's got stuff on there that's not accurate and it
misses some of the things that you got.
And your awards and your ribbon rack is not correct.
And the schools that you attended are not all in there.
The training you had, your deployments, your days overseas
and so on. Like I said, I got this thing
right over my shoulder right here.
It's right back there. It's an American flag with a
thin blue line on it. Came from my unit in Washington
DC when I was working for the FBI by smart people.
The guy who did it, military veteran Wes Pointer.
Good dude. It's the most FBI thing I own.
Why? Because the dates that are there
that says thank you for your service to our unit are not the
dates that I actually served in the unit.
It's the dates that my supervisor was at the unit,
which is hilarious. It's freaking hilarious that he
put his own dates down on my plaque because they missed it by
6 months. I'm just telling you, this
happens all the time. There's nothing automatic in the
government. So the fact that he thinks that
he automatically was a citizen simply because his mom got it
and then they went and got him in in in El Salvador, it's just
funny to me. And again, the opportunity cost
is they're covering this with emotion.
They're just, they're kind of skewing it.
There's no media bias, though. Not at NPR and certainly not at
NBC. Sure.
I wanted to give you contrast about this stuff, this big
scandal that we're having about Pete Hegseth about about Waltz
and other things. How about, how about is the
Trump administration really that scandalous?
Because we really haven't solved this problem yet.
Remember when Lloyd Austin was the Secretary of Defense and we
disastrously pulled out of Afghanistan after 20 years of
war and we left a bunch of people dead?
Why don't we just hone in on the fact that they brought in
125,000 people ahead of no business being in the United
States? God knows who they are.
Maybe they're the ones that are out there in that Islamic center
in Texas. But yeah, killing off 13 people
who are service members, no big deal to these guys.
I don't want to hear anything about, like, the fact that he
published a quote, UN quote war plan when in fact nothing
happened. Meanwhile, here's a legitimate
war plan that they did. They ended the war and they
killed off Americans, and there's been no justice on that.
So again, spare me with this sort of outrage nonsense.
But do you have regrets about the withdrawal from Afghanistan?
I support the president's decision.
Do you have regrets of about their withdrawal or how the
withdrawal occurred from Afghanistan that cost the lives
of 13 of our service members? I don't have any regrets.
You don't have any regrets? Secretary Austin is very
telling. Secretary Austin, has there ever
been any accountability for anyone within the Department of
Defense for the deadly, botched and embarrassing withdrawal from
Afghanistan? Any accountability?
Hey listen, our our our troops evacuated 124,000 people off
that airfield. Has anyone been held
accountable? No.
If a Navy captain grounded a ship, what happens immediately?
Typically that that captain is removed.
That captain is removed. Has anyone been held accountable
for what happened in Afghanistan?
To my knowledge, no. You don't regret it.
No one's ever been held accountable, Mr. Chairman.
This is why this Republican majority must provide the
accountability that this administration wants to sweep
under the rug with what happened in Afghanistan.
That's right. There needs to be
accountability. That's why Ashley Babbitt needs
to be revisited. That's why hurricane crossed by
hurricane needs to be revisited. That's why FBI whistleblowers
need to be made whole. My buddy Steve friend, you're
about to if you guys are on Rumble, we're going to send you
over to the American Radicals podcast if you want to listen in
on there. Garrett A Boyle, Steve friend.
Both of them not made whole. Seraphin family not made whole.
We survived. We made it through.
I'm grateful that we have the situation we have, but let's see
some things fixed. Let's see gun rights fixed.
Let's see a bunch of stuff that's going on.
Let them talk about Signal chats.
I couldn't care less. I think it's funny.
I got a last little piece here for when woke goes wrong, when
you decide to cast the wrong guy and the wrong DEI cast member.
So a little funny thing about Harry Potter, apparently it's
going to be ATV show about it. Before we do, we'll say one more
time. Rumble.com/kyle Seraphin is
where you see the show live at 0930 Eastern Time.
It's 8:30 in Texas, America. That is not a battle plan.
That is a fact. You can also join us on YouTube.
It's at Kyle Seraphin or X at Kyle Seraphin.
Find a streaming there live as well.
If that's where you want to do it.
Make sure you guys like the the video if you're doing it, share
and subscribe and so on. If you want to be part of the
locals, we're doing our call in show tonight where you guys call
in and you set the agenda. Make sure that you are are
subscribed up if you want to be part of that and you'll get the
phone number. And then lastly on Spotify, Kyle
seraphinshow.com if you want to watch it after the fact with no
pop up ads and no interruptions and you want an easy way to do
it. That is our favorite way to do
so. It's better than iTunes for me.
It's better than it's better than Spotify and so on because
you won't have anything interrupting you and you get
video or audio or both. You can switch around.
You can change it up as you go. Here's your palate cleanse of
the day. A little funny thought about
what happens if you choose a Harry Potter character and you
choose the wrong guy. Should we, should we really be
making Snape the black guy if you're only going to have one
black teacher at Hogwarts? Have you heard this?
There is a black guy who just got casted to play Snape in the
new Harry Potter TV show. Did you hear about it?
I heard about it. I kind of think it's a bad idea
idea, but hear me out. Hear me out.
What do we know about Snape and Harry Potter's relationship and
why is this going to? Go bad.
Harry doesn't trust Snape for some reason, and he can't figure
out why. Yeah, it only works if Harry's
Black too. Yeah, it's going to be very
awkward. And Harry walks in and sees the
one Black teacher at Hogwarts and goes, I don't know what it
is about him. I just can't trust him, you
know? You know what I think?
I bet you he's the guy who stole the sorcerer's stoke.
People are like, why do you think that, Harry?
I don't know. I just have this feeling.
Snipe kill Dumbledore. What are you talking about?
Did you see it? No.
Just look at him. Also, he is the T-shirt of.
The Dark Arts, you know, literally until the last movie.
There you go. OK, But for seven movies, it's
just Harry going like, I don't trust him.
He's the only guy who could teach the Quidditch players how
to dunk. I think he had something to do
with killing my parents. Why do you think that, Harry?
I think he just associates with some bad characters.
Do you have any proof of that? It's a feeling.
So I think we could all agree this is a bad casting.
That is a bad casting. Don't do that, folks.
Don't, don't be woke. Don't do woke casting.
Just keep it. Keep it right.
All right, that's it for the day.
I hope you guys have a great, fantastic day.
Again, if you're watching over here on Rumble, you'll go to the
American Radicals. If you guys want to see that,
make sure you share, make sure you are, make sure you're tuned
in here and we'll see you tomorrow for Friendly Friday.
I expect Steve Friend will be back here to go visit his
parents. So we're going to get him on and
we'll see. I had a pretty funny hot take
from him earlier today. I'll make sure he saves it for
you tomorrow. God bless you.
See you soon. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Serafin show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Serafin Bobble Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at
Kyle Serafin.