Are you familiar with FBI special agents Kyle Serpent?
I'm familiar with the name. Is that?
Yes, I'm familiar with the name. Familiar with the name, familiar
with the name. Let's bring in Kyle Serafin.
He's the FBI whistleblower who helped expose government
censorship of our First Amendment rights.
Now, we only have this memo because a recently suspended FBI
agent called Kyle Serafin brought it to the public, and
we're grateful that he did. Kyle, thank you so much for
joining us tonight. He's the host of something that,
strangely, is called the Kyle Serafish.
Kyle Serafi, I can't thank you enough for speaking out.
I knew you guys were out there and I knew it was just a matter
of time. But you got a lot of guts
putting your face and your name to this.
You're doing a service on behalf of the American people.
And from the bottom of my cracked and broken heart
sometimes, thank you very much. Take a look behind the curtain
with a real whistle blower, an American patriot.
Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this
program has no time for comforting lies.
Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment
defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin.
Well, hello my friends, welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show.
Today is Wednesday, it is December the 18th.
We are closing in on the end of the year, we are closing in on
Christmas, and if you're checking your advent calendar,
we are just a few days away inside one week from the big
day. I know a lot of kids are pretty
excited about that. We got some wild weather here in
Central Texas. I was complaining to Joe Pags
about this yesterday. It was 70° Yesterday.
I went for a jog in a tank top as ridiculous as that felt in
nothing but Ranger panties and no sleeves.
And today it is in the 50s and it is pissing rain and it is
driving because we don't do half assed things here in Central
Texas. We get rain coming at us from
all directions and blowing across.
So it's ugly out. And if you guys are in a real
place with real winter and you thinking, oh man, it's really
cold and miserable here, Can we just say I'm a little envious of
you? I I dislike Texas schizophrenic
weather. We got kind of a schizophrenic
kind of all over the map Newsday.
So I'm going to cover down on a bunch of stuff.
But today's lead is going to be something that's just a little
bit silly because I just can't take it that seriously.
The story of Canada, our neighbors up in America's attic,
We're going to be talking about Donald Trump trolling them as
the 51st state. If you guys saw the thumbnail
today, it had the 51st state. It's the Canadian Maple Leaf
flag with a 51 on the inside. But I kind of think it's funny.
I think we should probably even consider doing it in real life
because there's a lot of unhappy Canadians and they might be
happier if they were Americans. They have a pretty unresponsive
government and that is the nature of the parliamentary
system. It's not exactly rule by all.
Justin Trudeau doesn't get voted in by a popular majority.
He has something like 32% of the votes the last time in his party
and they make these coalitions. So anyway, we're going to talk a
little bit about Canada. We're going to talk about the
concern the mainstream media has of Donald Trump going after
Canadians and Justin Trudeau and so on because they want to keep
the status quo. They'd like to maintain this
sort of global order of people that are on the hard laughed.
And it helps if you have American neighbors in the up in
the attic there if the snow. Mexicans continue to be
basically borderline communists. Then, then they get to win.
They get to at least say, look, look how good things are in
Canada. Remember, we used to always have
them say, well, they never have to pay for their medical care.
I've actually seen some pretty interesting videos of people
saying like, not only do I pay, but I pay out out the butt for
for medical care. And it's not something I want to
keep doing. All right, before we get too
deep into the weeds, let's go ahead and say thanks to a
sponsor because that's how this program gets done.
This is why we're still on the air.
Let's dive into this weird Newsday on a weird weather day
and hopefully we don't get cut off by the Internet services.
All right, so all of you that are out there in the chat, if
you guys are watching right now, make sure you have liked the
video. Make sure that you will
subscribe to the video. And we're actually out there on
YouTube again, which I've decided kind of against.
I went ahead and played the game just a little bit.
We're going to play within the rules and see if we can't grow
this audience a bit. So if you're watching there,
make sure that you've subscribed and turn the notifications on
and so on. Do all those things.
And if you guys ever get in a bind where you're like, there's
too many advertisements, not from me, but from from the the
outside services, you can always watch us at Spotify.
I'd like to see that because they give us really good data on
who you are. And it's kind of interesting to
see who you are out there. So Spotify always has a video
podcast uploaded after the fact. Just so you all are aware.
Let's do it. Here we go.
Donald Trump is going after Canada, but everyone else is
next. You know, I like to start at the
home page of CNN to see what the most trusted name in news has to
say. And I realized that we haven't
visited Stephen Collinson a little while.
He was kind of all over the map. He was the guy that I would see
crying about Donald Trump First things first, almost every
single day during the campaign. And he's kind of been a little
bit quiet, or at least I haven't been aware of his stories.
They haven't been that interesting of late.
So here's some analysis by my favorite analyst, Steven
Coulson, and a picture there of Donald Trump sitting next to
Justin Trudeau. Trump is stocking political
mayhem in Canada by intensifying a crisis that threatens to out
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Now, why on earth does CNN care?
I believe, like I said, that they're just trying to continue
with the sort of most favorite Canadian neighbor status.
They want to make sure that they have someone that they can do
that's America's loyal neighbor and ally.
And now we have a man, Donald Trump.
And they said this, I swear to God.
He says it's a preview of the belligerent strategy as he
scours the globe for a big second term win before even
taking office. He's bullying an embattled
political foe who he mocks as the governor of the 51st state.
So much Pearl clutching and so much outrage.
Donald Trump shows a willingness to plunge the allies domestic
politics. And that should be a warning to
strife, torn governments in places like France, Germany and
South Korea, where political chaos and internal divides make
it hard for them to fight back. What are we seeing here?
We're seeing an analyst at an American news station crying
about the so-called strife torn governments of places.
What they've done is that you've seen governments basically lose
touch with their people. All of the governments might
fall away from leftist policies, which is sort of like, oh God,
we better, we better all fall in line and just support government
for its own sake. Now, I always say this that
leftism is a is a religion. It's a religion that worships
government as its central deity. So whenever you start attacking
the governments that have embraced that you're going right
up against, you're doing a heresy.
That's what Stephen Collinson seems to be indicating here.
Couple things that he's really upset about Canada.
By the way, I just watched a video of Justin Trudeau talking
to to steel workers, talking about how he's protecting their
jobs by adding 25% tariffs on steel.
Donald Trump has threatened to impose 25% tariffs on Canadian
goods in order to coerce that government in Ottawa to work
more closely with, to have that sort of non, non protective
status against American goods. If you want to be on our team,
you want to be in that sort of North American free trade
situation, which was going on since the Clinton era, then you
got to take that down. That's what he said.
So he's just going to push it back.
He's like, oh, you want to tariff our goods, We're going to
tariff your goods. This is very, very bad.
Why? Because Americans in leftist
news organizations think that not only should we try to be
more like the European governments that we are
supporting, they kind of think that it's our job to give things
away at the cost of American businesses.
I'm seeing you guys in the chat adopt my favorite term, the snow
Mexicans. I'll go on record again and say
that snow Mexicans AKA Canadians, they don't really get
offended by that term. In fact because Canadians are
really a polite people and I think they just want to be left
alone. Probably a lot like most
Americans. Snow Mexicans, the real ones
will ignore it if you call them that and the ones that are the
most Pearl clutching and probably would be friends with
people like Stephen Colonson. If you find those kind of snow
Mexicans, what they will do if you offend them is they will go
find someone else to apologize to because Canadians are
inherently friendly people. I had a buddy that lived up in
Alberta for a little while and was working in the the oil
industry and he found that they were very lovely people.
I think most of them are probably aligned with the way
that we operate and so much so that we can kind of fight a
little. Funny thing.
This is from a guy named Tom Green.
Most of us don't realize, or we do realize and we're just not
Privy to it on a daily basis, that not only is Donald Trump
trolling the so-called governor of the 51st states, but
Canadians despise him. A lot of them do, so much so
that it is commonplace to see very unpleasant looking flags
indicating their distaste. So here is Tom Green, who's a
comedian but pretty well versed in what goes on in Canada as a
long time Canadian. And he's talking about something
that Americans don't see. The flags that say expletive
Trudeau. He's going to say it.
So if you're sitting at work, you need to turn down the volume
or put on your earplugs, your earphones so that you don't
offend your boss, especially if your boss happens to be a snow
Mexican. Enjoy this one.
You know what you would probably be amazed to see?
I don't know if this is so common in Canada that we just
don't even really. I don't even think to mention
it. Driving around everywhere in the
country, in the city, everywhere people pick up trucks.
Fuck Trudeau flags. It says fuck Trudeau Black Flag,
white letters Canada flag on it. People are mad.
And so it's not just like everybody in Canada is just down
with it. Now enough people are down with
it that he got elected, but he may not get elected the next
time. No, he may not.
It turns out if you don't do a good job in a nominal democracy
or some sort of democratic process, you probably won't find
your way back at the top of the ticket.
But you know who did? Donald Trump.
So what's amazing is we had this sort of push and, and I keep
seeing this over and over again, the left is still trying to
figure out what the hell happened and how do we defend
what we just did because it doesn't seem very defensible and
the most Americans don't seem all that in line with it.
This is kind of a fun little story that comes from NBC.
Trump says that his inauguration and his inaugural will all be
about unity. And they're already going to
predict that. That's a tough sell.
Well, The thing is, is that Donald Trump has brought in
people a big tent. We've talked about it here
before. There are plenty of folks that
you as a potentially conservative listen to this or a
independent minded person listening to this podcast.
You're, you're going, no, I don't want that person.
You got upset about a surgeon general.
We had this discussion yet the other day on social media.
You're upset about some of the folks that are in there.
He's got some pretty left wing types with some pretty left wing
ideas, at least historically. And it's been embraced.
That's what a big tent is about. Now, it's been my position on
this on the show, and we've said it a couple times, so I'll say
it again, that if you open the tent big, if you open it wide,
you're going to get diverse viewpoints and people that don't
necessarily agree with the so-called MAGA, right, the
conservative, right. That's what's supposed to
happen. That's how you open it up.
That's what unity would look like.
Unity would look like we kind of embrace a bunch of ideas, some
of which we want, some of which we don't, in order to compromise
in the areas that are most important to other people to get
the guy at the top of the ticket.
And that's what you should be seeing.
NBC is going to resist this. They are already part of it.
They're telling us it's a tough sell.
And I threw up another little headline on this particular on
this particular slide because it reminded me just how ugly it was
not too long ago. It's a headline from October.
You can see that right there. Trump loyalists spew racist,
vulgar attacks at Harris and Democrats at the New York City
rally. That was that Madison Square
Garden rally that you'll notice. We haven't heard anything about
that. Why?
The reason that Trump won't be able to have a unity in his
inaugural is because Trump is one of the most divisive figures
in American politics, so striking a unifying tone is
difficult. I don't think that's true.
I think that they have painted him as such.
They've basically sort of entered into a fantasy realm
where whatever they say is going to be what goes.
He's a guy that's trying to do a political makeover, they claim,
and he's cast himself as something notably off brand, a
unifier. Well, then we get that same
exact nonsense from Joe Biden, quite recently, in fact.
Didn't he step out in front of Independence Hall with a with an
armed guard Marine standing behind and lit by red and the in
a red and black image that will not soon go away?
Probably the thing that was the downfall of this particular
president's legacy. He did the opposite of unity.
He declared 50% of the country to be American enemies, the
extremists, which is just sort of like people we don't like or
agree with. And maybe that's why we've got
Democrats right now. It's kind of struggling to
figure out how do we message and why aren't Democrats trying to
defend the legacy of Biden? Here's MSNBC attempting to do
that. They're trying to say, why are
people not trying to run on Biden's legacy?
It's because he lost. Not only did he lose big by
having to drop out of the race, but then his surrogate dropped
out and failed, which is shocking to most of us because,
you know, I didn't think it was going to be fair.
Here they are trying to discuss, they're trying to re adjudicate
something because they just cannot figure out how did we
lose when we are the moral right again, it's a religious
conviction that they have about it.
And so religious don't have to look introspectively and decide
whether or not their messaging was bad because their messaging
is the is a moral ground. It has nothing to do with the
sort of factual or poll based or where the American people are.
The American people are supposed to because they've been told to
and otherwise they're going to be bad people.
So they're going to go out and keep telling us this.
The idea of defending President Biden's accomplishments and
legacy, it does seem like right now in the aftermath of the vice
president's defeat, a lot of even Democrats are kind of
running away from what what the White House did over four years.
Even though those inside The West Wing are confident that
history will regard them favorably, their legislative
accomplishments at the very least.
What is the challenge here for Democrats?
How do you navigate this? Well, a couple of things.
Number one, I mean, we have to really reflect on the fact that
President Biden in the first, it wasn't even the first four
years, it was the 1st 18, 19 months of this presidency passed
four major economic bills. We talked about this last week
on the show. Joe, Can you imagine where
America's economy would be right now if we had not passed the
American Rescue Plan after COVID and make sure that we could, you
know, get our, you know, reduce inflation as much as we possibly
could. And we look at where the US
inflation numbers are compared to some of the other
industrialized nations. I mean, we were doing far better
off during COVID. You can't always say that to
voters, but that's just the bottom line.
So and. By the way, that is so
important, Adrian, I, you know, I've been talking about, you
know, went, went, went overseas this weekend, talked to a lot of
business leaders, talked to a lot of political leaders.
They're all talking about basically the US economic
miracle. They're all, I got to say.
They're all downbeat because they're kind of asking how do we
get here, what you guys have in America, because that gulf is
widening between American prosperity and I'll just say it,
the EU and Britain's downturn. I mean, and my God, you, you, I
mean, you look what's happening in France.
You look at what's happening in Germany.
You know, everybody in London this weekend were laughing.
They said, OK, so let's get this straight.
Italy is the most stable democracy over there and Greece
is one of the most stable economies things.
People actually listen to that program for news and they think
that they're going to walk away informed.
Is that not? Is that not shocking and
staggering? Listen folks, you idiots out
there that are that are complaining about the economy
that the entire election hinged on an economic principle and
inflation has screwed you up. You think you should be thanking
God AKA government for the American Rescue Plan?
How dare you not recognize the brilliance of what was
perpetrated upon you. How dare you not recognize how
good your situation is. Europeans wish to have such a
good thing. I mean, that's that's the
position of Joe Scarborough. He talked to Europeans and they
wish that they had a Joe Biden. Maybe we could voluntarily send
him there. I don't think he's going
anywhere. I don't think he has any other
capabilities in his life going to just wither away.
Let's send him over. Let's export Joe Biden so he can
solve their problems in the same way or whoever it is that's
pulling the strings of the Joe Biden, right?
Because that's really the question.
It's not just that he's got a pretty cool legacy going on
right now, right? How do you how do you defend the
Biden legacy? How about this one?
This is maybe and what should be the thing that goes down in
history as the most incredible turn of events.
We had no new wars, as exciting as that was.
And you know, I, I think that Donald Trump's foreign policy
was good and was actually probably better than most people
will give him credit for. Why?
Because the Israel, the, the Abraham Accords, the fact that
we didn't actually create more conflict in the Middle East,
which we are seeing happen right now.
Like in the last couple days before he goes in, they're
creating a brand new mess for him to fix.
The historical legacy of Biden is going to, they're going to
look back and they're going to say America was at war for 20
years with a group called the Taliban in Afghanistan.
And in short order, in like 6-7 months of being president, Joe
Biden pulled us out of there, left a power vacuum that within
seconds, it was measured in days before that country fell to the
people that we held it from for 20 years.
And it was the most tactically unsound withdrawal that could
happen. That was Part 1.
And then not to be outdone, in his last year, in the last,
what, 60 days of his presidency, we've seen the failure and the
weakness that we've projected. And yeah, it's because there's
an ongoing war in Ukraine, which we've funded, which we've thrown
unbelievable amounts of treasure into.
We're seeing Syria captured by a group called HTS, which is
functionally aligned with al Qaeda, you know, the other
people that we went to war with starting in 2001.
So we've had a hard reset on giving territory back to
terrorists. And here is Anthony Blinken
saying that the Syrian people are going to get to choose it.
They're going to get to choose it even though it was sort of
militarily conquered. This is an incredible legacy to
try to defend. This is why they're not trying
to defend it, by the way, on Syria, very focused on the
opportunity that now is before us and before the Syrian people
to move from out, out from under the shackles of Bashar al-Assad
to a different and better future for the Syrian people.
One that the Syrian people decide for themselves as a
different and better future, that they will decide for
themselves as they operate now under a new terrorist regime,
not the old one. OK, defend that all you want, if
you want. That's how you do it.
But remember, Trump's going to have a hard time with unity.
I got another fun thing. This is a story about poor
Kamala Harris, who, by the way, is still the vice president.
There's a great sort of like series of memes that are going
on right now on, on the the Twitter webs or whatever running
around saying that Donald Trump, by the way, he's not in office
yet, would not do anything about school shootings.
But if President Harris had existed, if, if Kamala Harris
had been elected, then she would.
And there's this brilliant little community notes Fact
Check in real time by regular people because we're not buying
this nonsense saying you, you know, she actually still in
office, 4 years of Biden, no solutions to school shootings.
It was never going to be about restricting guns.
But that's kind of what they want to talk about.
She still is equally irrelevant and ridiculous.
And here's a fun little story talking about her.
This is coming from NPR, so why not?
I like NPR sometimes. I've got some really interesting
pieces on there. We're going to cover another
piece of NPR later on. There was a time when Vice
President Harris's campaign seemed like it had the youth
vote all sewn up. You know, that youth vote, that
famously strong and powerful youth vote that carries so many
people into office. You know, the young people that
basically don't know anything about how the country operates,
as Jordan Peterson would say, doesn't, doesn't even know how
to clean their room, knows nothing about money, has never
paid a significant amount in taxes, has no skin in the game
when it comes to all these things.
Those really intelligent people. And I say that as someone who
just knew when I was younger, I was like, I just don't know what
the hell I'd be voting for. I don't know enough.
I don't have skin in the game. Well, we have some kids.
You got some people out there looking at a future.
You start understanding a little bit more.
She gave a speech on Tuesday to young community leaders.
I assume this is like young Obama types.
And she made the not so subtle reference to the initial youth
excitement about her presidential bid.
She reminded them of the context in which they exist.
Then she smiled and said, yeah, I did that.
This is a very clever reference, according to NPR, to the 2023
speech where she talked about something allegedly her mother
used to say. My mother would give us a hard
time sometimes and say, don't you know what's wrong with you
young people? You think you just fell out of a
coconut tree? The coconut tree meme speech.
What she doesn't realize, I guess, and maybe what NPR fails
to to note because it's actually listed in here, the the line
became a meme. The meme became a digital
rallying cry for young Democrats who are eager for a younger face
after souring on Biden's presidency.
Yes, they wanted that young face of Kamala Harris, a 60 year old
woman, because the 81 year old man was too old for them.
And so they embraced Internet hype for 100 days and then they
failed. The issue was never about
whether or not the meme or the coconut tree or the existing in
context. Imagine this.
I'm going to give you the same exact statement.
And I'm going to phrase it as a thing that my father used to say
to me. He never said this, by the way.
But if he had said it, it would sound like this.
I'd say, you know, my dad would always look at us when he was
young and he would say, why are you guys operating this way?
You have to understand that there are bigger effects that
are happening around you. You didn't just fall out of an
apple tree and then sprout into a full grown plant.
OK, that's really boring and dumb.
That's what she said, the coconut tree thing.
The difference is the noticeable difference is I didn't do this.
The weird laugh. So she's disingenuous, she's
awkward, she's weird, she's not authentic and they don't
understand that it had nothing to do with the actual message
they had to do with the messenger and how bad it was.
Scott Jenning is trying his best to educate people over at Cnni
don't know why. Just let him keep putting
forward, you know, disingenuous falsehoods.
Let them keep putting Elizabeth Warren types and Kamala Harris.
That'd be fine with me. I don't mind.
They're not electable because they're weird.
Because the thing that they accused, they had Tim Waltz, the
dancing Queen, as the man that was going to bring back
masculinity. A guy who couldn't figure out
how to load his own shotgun. So anyway, Scott Jennings is
doing God's work, I guess He's trying to bring sanity to a
group of people that again, they are holding on to religious
fervor. They are holding on to to dogma
that we are better and therefore we should win because we are
better. Who could be against us because
our God of government is with us?
This seems to be kind of the way that it's operating.
Anyway. He's trying to educate them.
They're resistant. CNN may get some ratings simply
because this man keeps going out there and saying things that
seem pretty true. Right, if your messengers are
incorrect, then it doesn't really matter what the 1st 2
bullets are. It's that authenticity.
And then what's the first clip we played tonight?
Kamala Harris, who popped out and she saw her shadow.
So we'll get four more ears of word salads.
It if if this is the road Democrats want to continue to go
down, people who are going to use cliches, pablum and sort of
just word salad answers to really important questions that
everyday people have. They will continue to lose.
However, if they take his advice and get authentic candidates who
may sometimes say things that are a little contradictory or
maybe it's a little raw, people will forgive your warts and your
contradictions if they think you're being real.
I think he's on to something. Yeah, I mean, there's something
to that. I mean, Joe Biden himself is
like at command being thinking about this.
Like right now, like, I don't. I just honestly don't.
These guys, by the way, coming to this conclusion here in
December as Joe Biden is going out the door when the rest of
America came to this conclusion months and months and months and
months and months ago is the funniest thing I've heard.
I. Also just say he is not
governing that way right now with the last few weeks that he
has left. That's very telling.
At least the people around him should be thinking about these
things. You need to prove democracy
proof, for lack of better world word, this coming administration
I mean. You need to democracy proof the
coming administration. You need to insulate the tyranny
of the majority. Well, they don't like it because
the majority actually sided against them.
But never, never mind that, never mind any of those things.
Let's just get focused in on the ridiculous.
And what's amazing is that James O'Keefe just put out some quote
UN quote new journalism. Another one of these sort of
like go on a date and then hidden camera film somebody in
Washington, DC, where the big reveal is that a person who's an
administrative analyst for the National Security Council, What
did he share? Joe Biden is functionally dead
and he doesn't actually do anything.
Shocker. We all figured this out when he
dropped out of the race because we knew this for years.
We knew this when he ran in 2020.
Anyway, again, mainstream, even some of the most like large Con
Inc type folks that are insulated against being
ridiculous, it doesn't stop them from just saying things that are
obviously true that everybody already said, agreed to and
moved on. They're over here adjudicating
it on CNN. We're not any better necessarily
on the political right, for whatever that's worth.
Just so we're all on the same page.
We are going to talk a little bit about the things that Joe
Biden is doing and not doing in the solution to the gun problem,
which they have, which is coming up next.
But first, I'm going to go ahead and break over to my buddies
over at Patriot Mobile because folks, the reason he lost,
Americans have been tired and frustrated by a stalling economy
and inflation and endless wars. You know, the things that
apparently that the Europeans loathe.
No, I'm sorry they they lost for there's been a relentless
assault on our values. Thankfully, there are companies
like Patriot Mobile that still believe in America and our
Constitution. We're proud to partner with
Patriot Mobile because they are on the front lines fighting for
the 1st and the Second Amendment.
Talking about that in a second, the sanctity of life and for our
military and our first responder heroes.
You can take a stand for conservative causes.
You can put America first by switching to Patriot Mobile.
You can do it today. They get the same nationwide
coverage because all the same big providers, they use the same
big three networks and they back their service with a coverage
guarantee. They have a 100% US based
customer service team that will find the best plan for your
needs. You can keep your number, you
can keep your phone, you can upgrade.
You can toss those things out. You can do so by going to
patriotmobile.com/KSS. Remember, this is a different
promo code KSS for Kyle Seraphin Show or you can call them up at
972 Patriot relatively easy right now.
You can get a free month of service when you use that offer
code. It's KSS.
Don't get fooled by other providers that are pretending to
share your values. They don't and they can't.
You can join us and switch to America's only Christian
conservative mobile network at Patriot Mobile again,
patriotmobile.com/KSS, patriotmobile.com/KSS or 972
Patriot for that free month of service.
All right, so we're going to talk about the Second Amendment.
I promised it. Let's do that.
We're talking about the gun, the situation.
We're back in the news talking about it.
You notice that they didn't have as much of a big gun issue.
For some reason, I thought they were going to about Luigi
Mangione because he went and shot somebody in New York City
and I thought we were going to hear about suppressors and
assassins and 3D printed guns and danger and all that, and we
didn't. Interesting.
More on that a little bit later. The lionization of a guy who's
being charged with first degree murder in New York.
We have to wait until it is a confused, suicidal young girl.
CNN covering this one small, tight knit community in Madison,
WI, reeling from the the school shooting as authorities
continued to seek answers. I am troubled at the answers
they might be able to find and I think they are going to struggle
at least a little bit. Why would that be?
Because you've got the police chief out there who can't even
figure out what the right pronouns are for a little girl
whose name was Natalie, but apparently went by the name
Samantha. I don't know why neither do you.
Why this gets included in all these pieces is really bizarre.
It's like, what relevance does that have?
You had a young child that was suicidal.
Apparently there were a combination of factors that were
the motivation and they are trying to determine that at this
moment. They declined to give a lot more
answers. This is not shocking to us.
They've had students in the In the Abundant Life Christian
School go out and talk about it. Here's what they broke down in
CNN that I find very interesting.
The victims the names have not been publicly revealed there was
a full time member of the staff, a teacher and a teenager and
then the the young gal herself 15 year old was the shooter the
weapon. Here's what we got to get
focused because we got to talk about gun control.
That's going to be the big piece the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives is tracing the weapon.
This is what they do. By the way, if you've never seen
it, every single time that there is a decent sort of attention
span a a national priority story that involves a firearm, the ATF
announces that they are quote UN quote responding.
I put it out on Twitter the other day.
There's always an ATF guy on scene.
They don't have any federal Nexus to investigate it.
But what they do is they show up and then they do something
called tracing the weapon. The weird thing about tracing
the weapon is their ability to do that is actually not allowed
under federal law. They're not actually allowed to
do this. They have this like half assed
version where they go and they collect all the records from
federal firearms licensees, the people that run gun stores.
And they take all those forms 4473 that you make and you fill
out whenever you go and buy a gun.
And they take them and they keep them in this sort of like paper
warehouse that they were able to look through and find and fairly
short or order considering how stupidly that is organized
because they're not allowed to have a national database of
firearms. But they do have this sort of
default version of it. And that's what they do to chase
the weapon. So what they want to do is find
out the origin, the weapon, who purchased it and how it got from
the manufacturer all the way into the hands of a 15 year old
girl. News flash, the story has
already been sort of put out there.
It was given to her by parents who seem really, really, really
in the in the a sad situation of bad decision theater court
records of obtained by the Washington Post show that Roop
now this is the girl's name. Natalie Roop now had a turbulent
home life that she'd been enrolled in therapy.
And the documents revealed that her parents divorced and
remarried multiple times. I don't know if that means they
remarried to other people multiple times or if they
married each other multiple times.
It's not really clear. But it says that their custody
agreements forced her to move between their homes every two to
three days. So an unstable home situation
may be responsible for this girl's really sad outcomes.
For those of you that have been children and grew up through
divorce situations, you know exactly what's going on there.
It seems like family of the shooter should be the number one
priority to talk about because family and stability in family
makes a huge difference. There was a video I watched the
other day and I didn't actually grab it.
I didn't think to it would actually be hard to watch in a
podcast format. But it's a, it's a toddler or
even a sub toddler, like an infant sitting there in the, you
know, first year of life playing with toys, probably probably
like 14-15 months old, non verbal.
And the toddler is sitting on the parents lap playing with
toys. And then someone comes in.
It's a woman by the way, it's not a man, but a woman comes in
and starts a verbal altercation with the man with a mom.
And when that verbal altercation happens, the toddler is unable
to play anymore because all human beings have the same
instinct. We all look around and we're
looking for threat. And when you were that small,
it's incredibly disruptive. And we know this from watching
our own children. If you have conflict in the
house, the children are more on edge.
They are more likely to engage in conflict with each other.
They are more likely to be edgy. They're more likely to be
distracted from otherwise sort of childlike activities and
play. If you fill a child's life with
turmoil that comes from divorce and, you know, adult
relationships that are not stable, then they're going to
have an instability. A very, very small number of
them will result in something like this.
But to act like it's the gun fault, which is what they've
decided to do, that's the way you got to do it.
So of course, we're going to hear David Hogg pop on the
screen and talk about it. He's the survivor of Parkland
shooting. There's some questions about
that. His dad was apparently an FBI
agent and he is running for DNC vice chair because politics is
the only way this kid is going to be able to make money.
He stands on the graves of his fallen classmates.
He's going to do it again. And so.
And here he is talking about why the Democrat Party has done a
great job and why Republicans are evil again.
It's a religious argument. It continues to be.
They don't need to have facts on their side.
You don't hear him campaigning for home life, for better
families or less divorce, which would be the right way to go,
and not less abortions and more responsible people.
It's this. Well, shootings have happened
418 since you made that speech. It's, I would say it's
unbelievable, but it's not because unfortunately this has
been going on for so long, since before I was born.
I was born a year after Columbine.
But I think the thing that disturbs me the most is how our
politicians have continued to fail us.
Our parties have continued to fail us as well.
Certainly the Democratic Party has gotten better in recent
years on this issue. But part of the reason why I'm
running to be vice chair is because I want a party that acts
with courage to address the issue of gun violence.
Not in a, in a, you know, not in a small symbolic way, not in
just, oh, this past this tiny, long way, but a way that
actually makes sure that there isn't, you know, half the number
of school shootings, but that there are no school shootings
anymore. And I can tell you right now for
for a fact, if Democrats had 60 votes in the Senate, we're still
not going to get major gun control passed because I know
our party in the politics within or they're going to say, well,
this is too controversial for us to pass because of these states
that it took for us to get to 60 votes.
I want to help build the Democratic Party, not one that
I'm just calling out publicly, but one that I'm actively
working, trying to fix on the inside to make sure that what
happened to my classmates is never happening again.
And our party is one of the best ways of doing that.
But we have to be bolder. We have to go further on the
issue of gun violence and not just address how does somebody
get a gun like the AR15, but address the hatred that drives
so many of these school shootings, address the the
poverty that drives so much gun violence and the desperation
that drives gun suicide. We have to address this from the
top up and the bottom down. I'm curious, if you just
acknowledge that there's a sort of a mental illness, a
depression, a financial incentive for crime and so on,
then doesn't that kind of indicate that the person behind
the gun is the only thing that matters?
Does the gun really matter? They have to demonize the AR15,
which is really funny. The funny thing is, and some of
you may realize this if you're gun people, but if you're not a
gun person and you've been sort of just watching from the
outside and seeing the the demonization of the so-called
black guns. The best part about it is some
of the biggest school shootings that have ever happened happened
with like 9mm handguns, like a Glock, which is what it sounds
like happened here. That also was the case at
Virginia Tech, which was an incredible number of people who
were killed. Handguns are highly effective at
doing that. In fact, in Virginia, a handgun
that can accept more than 20 rounds in the magazine is
considered an assault weapon. When I used to live in Virginia,
I used to laugh because I would go to meetings where Jerry
Conley was speaking with the Moms Who Demand Action, and I
would have an assault weapon on my person because I have 33
round magazines that'll fit into my clock.
It turns out you can make the magazine as big as you want, it
just has to fit into the magwell.
And then behind it can be a freaking drum if you want.
But they're willing to demonize something that Democrats
actually made the National gun of America, right?
The assault weapons ban in 1994, which Joe Biden likes to stand
on and talk about how great it was and what they did and how
they got it passed and all this kind of stuff.
Nobody was buying mass amounts of AR fifteens.
There are two things that changed the game.
Number one is the assault weapons ban that changed the
game, where people were like, oh, you're banning this.
I'm going to go ahead and have to get a couple of those.
Definitely going to get those as soon as, as soon as that bill
sunsets, we're getting some. And they did and I did.
I was one of those people in 2006, got my first AR at a gun
show, which is the last time I've ever bought anything at a
gun show, by the way. They're not the great, greatest
way to get it done, but they made it the enemy.
It's Harry Potter style. It's like they were, there were
many options, but they chose that one to be their enemy and
that made it to be the thing that many people wanted.
And then the second thing is the innovation of technology and the
global war on terrorism and the fact that so many veterans came
home and had experience using platforms that were similar to
that. They had been trained on a
weapon system in the M Fours and the M16 types.
OK, So they went in and they said, well I want to use a
weapon system that I'm most familiar with, and this is one
that I am. One of the folks that that
support our program and also don't have a problem with your
AR15, they're not going to come and try and take it.
In fact, they're quite the opposite.
They support veterans, including veterans who have disabilities
and have given a lot for this country.
My friends over at Patriot Coolers.
And if you guys don't have one of these things, if you're in
the market, don't buy anything you don't need.
But if you're in the market for an outstanding product, this one
is really, really good. And I left it in my garage for
about a week and I forgot that I had it out there.
I thought it was actually up on my wall and I found it again and
I've been very excited to find my major, which is their large
40 ounces of refrigerated slash thermal insulated coolerness.
You guys can get a Tumblr from Patriot Coolers using promo code
KY Outley. They can be engraved or not
engraved. If you want the Kyle Seraphin
show edition, which is to say we have the suspendable badge or
you can put the flag on there. They look outstanding actually
here, reach down and grab another one.
Look at this one. This one is actually also quite
good. This is the 30 oz.
You can get the 30, you can get the 40, you can get a 20, you
can get a 19, you can get a 16. You can get a water bottle.
They have all kinds of really great stuff.
They're great gifts. They're probably on the very
edge of being able to get it out for Christmas right now.
If you guys do fast shipping, you can probably get that done
because they ship from America and not from overseas.
Patriot coolers.com promo code Kyle.
Save yourself 10% on that and get free shipping over 50 bucks
by two, one for you and one for a friend.
You'll be happy you did. Only if you're in the market,
though. That's what we say.
All right, let's keep pushing on.
Speaking of Jerry Connolly, which I brought up a little bit
earlier, I didn't know that he had cancer.
Did you guys know this? Jerry Connolly apparently
announced this. I, I noticed it.
I mean, the guy has lost a lot of weight.
He was a big fat guy with a dumb mustache, but he's lost weight
and not in a healthy way. And apparently on, I guess
November the 7th, he announced that he had cancer.
And it's esophageal cancer, which doesn't sound like a
really good thing or a fun way to exist.
And I guess he had a little win because Democrats are turning
over that, that that great messenger.
We're going to have the fresh faces by letting old white guys
who have 1970s mustaches and are dying of cancer instead of the
AOC types, you know, continue you as you wish.
He's not, he's not very lovable. He's not very honest when you
listen to him talk. He's not very informed or
educated on all of the stuff he talks about.
But so be it. He's a Democrat veteran, which
is to say that he's been in the Democrat Party for a long time,
not that he served America. He fed it off.
A challenge from progressive Republican AOC Alexandria Ocasio
Cortez on Tuesday to be the top ranked member.
Isn't that pathetic too? By the way, I think he's like 74
years old. He's being challenged by this 30
something. This is this is how serious the
Democrats are. It's it's A or B.
It's either someone who has the the experiential equivalent of
being a child. She worked in a restaurant and
now she is a Now she's a Congress person and a social
media star or a guy that's been in Congress for 1000 years.
Those are their two choices. Good deal.
He served on the Oversight Committee in O9HE led the
subcommittee on government operations since 2013.
He announced that he has cancer. This is all of the story here.
And he won. He won the vote to become the
ranking member of the House Oversight Committee.
So we can expect the opposite of oversight from what he does.
They're not particularly interested in doing real
oversight. Why?
Because they're the same kind of people that have to defend the
ridiculous and pathetic legacy Joe Biden.
They're the ones that are really excited.
They kind of work hand in glove with the people like, I don't
know, Republicans that want to pass dumpster fire spending
bills. I'm sure Jerry Conley is 100% on
board with this. Supposedly we got a big win if
you listen to Mike Johnson. But I've got some some news from
some other people. This tactic, this technique,
you'll notice what day it is today.
It's Wednesday, December the 18th, isn't it?
Stand by because Nostra Thomas, AKA Thomas Massie is going to
give us a little insight into this.
First, let's hear a little bit about the CR which is going on
government oversight. It seems to be a real myth, at
least on the Democrat side and for what you guys like to call
rhinos. But I would call the real
Republicans the real people. You are not real Republicans if
you're conservative. Real Republicans want to spend
money, and that's why they congratulate themselves when
they set up a spending bill to spend more of our money right
under the gun and break their own promises because they hope
that your, your, your memory cycle is not long enough to
recall it. Some Republicans are pissed, but
here's Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House, congratulating
himself on a job well done, doing the thing that he promised
he wouldn't do. Standby, because I got the
receipt on that. Just one second.
First, let's listen to Mike talk about.
It new spending, but we we fought them off from that.
We did add $231 million in new Secret Service funds, but
everybody understands that that's critically important
right now. We added strings attached to it.
We said it was contingent upon the Secret Service participating
fully in our oversight responsibilities and
investigations right now. And I am certainly hopeful that
they will, that they will need to if they expect to have the
additional funds. Also, we made sure that that was
kept within the spending cap. So it's not new money, but that
will, that will help us. We did expand our our task
force, as you know, on the assassination to add the second
assassination attempt. And I think that's really
important. But overall with the with the CR
as, as our leader just noted, we have, we have broken the
Christmas Omni and I have no intention of going back to that
terrible tradition. So there won't be a Christmas
omnibus. If somebody asked me in the
hallway a little while ago, will there be mini buses?
I don't, we don't want any buses.
We're not going to do any buses. OK, we'll, we'll deal with that
in the lame duck and I'm going to hope, I'm going to plead, I'm
going to urge the Senate to do their job as a leader, Scalise
noted. We're.
Not going to have any buses. They're just doing ACR.
This is such a depressing moment to read this stuff and to listen
to them. Why do they say CR?
Because if they said continuing resolution, then that would be a
little bit more. And then you realize, what are
they continuing? They're continuing the spending,
but they've also added to it. What's the difference between
that and a minibus or an omnibus duration?
It's more of the same. Here's ABC News reporting on it.
Congressional leaders have finally released the short term
government funding bill to avert a shutdown at the end of this
week. I actually hope they shut it
down. I don't care.
The measure will fund the government through March 14th.
So they've just kicked the can down for another three months
because these people, they have one job to do, run the power of
the purse, and they're too busy doing everything else,
investigations and oversight. Yeah, some of those things are
important, but do your job first.
You know it. It's predictable.
It happens every single freaking year that you have to put a
funding bill in for what the federal government is going to
spend, and they don't do it. I don't know why that they can't
just like and they have to do it in these insanely long bills.
This bill was pictured on a desk and it's about 8 inches tall in
single leaf paper. It is 15147 pages long.
There's no way they get through all this stuff and they bury
little things in like obscure language.
I saw a report on Twitter today saying that one of the things in
there is that it's going to change the way that the federal
judiciary is able to look at subpoenas into congressional
records and they want to eliminate and quash all requests
for records. I'm sure that's part of it.
It was a little, you know, like I don't have the context of how
it came out, but it seems like they were defining it pretty,
pretty broadly, which does tend to overreach.
If they're saying that the the judiciary can't look into it or
the executive can't investigate, that's strange.
The measure includes 104, a $100.4 billion in disaster
relief because they ran out of money because they gave our
money to illegal aliens, $10 billion in economic relief for
farmers. So they're giving the payoff
there in subsidies. It reauthorize, reauthorizes the
Department of Homeland Security unmanned aircraft systems
program, which I'm sure is the reason why we're seeing these
drones out there. It counters the potential threat
of drones and allows Homeland Security to have all kinds of
coordinated systems to address them.
The farm bill goes for a year, by the way, when they signed it
in. So not everything goes on just
till March. It grants DC control of RFK
Stadium so they can move the NF LS commanders from Maryland to
DC. I'm sure that's super important.
That's why you have to stick that in so everybody gets a
little bit of something. Ana Paula Luna was talking about
how they basically stuck all the things in that she was trying to
get on a separate bill. And so she has to vote in favor
of it because her constituents need the things that are in the
bill, but she doesn't like the rest of it.
That's that's what they do. They just shove in.
Everybody gets their piece, but then they also put in the big
piece. You know who predicted this?
Tom Massie, AKA Nostra Thomas. Here he is calling out the the
things that have been going on for years.
He talks about seven years ago. You, you won't be able to see
this if you're just listening, but the date on the screen is
2019. That was five years ago.
So in the last 12 years he's been seeing this happen over and
over again. They always get it right about
the time of December 20th, right about the time when the recess
is going to basically let him out and they say vote for this
bill or you don't get to go home for Christmas.
This is the, this is the game. And they think we don't pay
attention. We have.
We have broken the Christmas Omni and I have no intention of
going back to that terrible tradition.
So there won't be a Christmas omnibus.
If somebody asked me in the hallway a little while ago.
Will they be many buses? We don't want any buses.
We're not going to do any buses, OK?
And I've seen this play call like four times in the seven
years I've been in Congress. They've punted the ball until
December 20th. And what they'll do is they'll
come in a in a closed room with us and they'll say, OK, now
we've got the really big omnibus.
And if you vote for this, you can go home for Christmas.
But if you don't vote for it and it fails, we're going to make
you stay here over Christmas and New Year's.
And it's almost like a dystopian future.
I've been in the closed room where they start chanting vote,
vote, vote, vote and people run up there and vote for something
they've not read. CRCRCR.
Oh, you want to go home for Christmas?
We'll vote for this and we'll let you go see your families and
your new grandbaby and you can watch your two year old open
presents. But if you don't, you're going
to stay here with your your leadership and their leadership
and wait. And wait for a bunch of
geriatric senators to send over the answer, by the way, that I
made another prediction that it would end right before
Christmas, that it wouldn't go till next spring.
Because, and we've talked about this on your show, Brian, for as
long as I've been coming on your show, which is at least 12
years. Every year, every year, every
year, they do the same. Play Christmas, Christmas Eve's
shut down panic because here's what they're doing.
They're taking our families hostage.
The hot of the the families of congressmen, Congressmen in
Washington DC on December 20th, which is when this CR expires.
And they're going to either put another worst CR that's probably
going to have Ukraine and everything else attached to it,
or they're going to do the full on omnibus depending on how the
election comes out. So that was that last little
thing you heard was him in October.
He just keeps predicting the same stuff because they play the
same same, you know, playbook. And they assume that 12 months
later that Americans just forget.
The pattern is very easy to observe.
It's really gross. It's also like really lame and
lazy, but it works because most Americans are not engaged in
this. I actually had a conversation
with some of my best buddies from high school.
I have a really interesting group of friends from high
school. Got one that works in
technology. Got another one that is kind of
an entrepreneur type and he's worked in oil fields and done
some other thing. Another one is a physician.
And then, you know, and I'm in the group there and we're
talking about this. And I said, despite all the
information that Americans have and they have incredible amounts
of information, way more than we had when I was growing up,
there's no evidence that anybody is actually using that
information to do anything. One of them is about medical
labs and research. We're talking about how I don't
actually run labs on myself and I have no idea.
I haven't been to a doctor in like 8 years.
I don't know what my health situation is in my body other
than how I feel. And that's all I, I gauge it on.
I gauge my appetite, I gauge my, the way that I can do physical
activities. I said, a lot of people go out
there, they get all this information and what do they do
with it? There's no evidence that we're
actually a rational people because despite all of that
information being available to us and, and in our within our
grasp, nobody does anything with it.
Like nobody's out there actually making actions happen related to
that data. So we all know that Tom Massie
is right and we all know that he's calling out these people
for doing the thing that they keep doing.
And it doesn't stop the fact that it happens every damn year.
All right, I guess like that, that is the thing.
What are they called? Like, like insanity, That
insanity is just doing the same thing over again, even though
you have evidence that it won't work out and you just think it
will, like for no particular reason.
Here's a good example of insanity that's popping up in
anytime I can do a climate piece I want to.
This one's from CBS. It's really fun because if you
watch the way that they're doing it, it's the same reason why
they don't have any trust from their listener group.
They're basically acting like people are dumb and can't read
their own words. And I guess most people read the
headlines. So here's the headline.
Coal use hitting all time high in 2024 which is on track to be
the hottest year ever, Report says OK.
They're literally doing the fallacy of a correlation instead
of causation in in the title. This is dated today.
Coal use hits all time high in 2024, which is on track to be
the hottest year ever. So hottest year ever.
Highest coal use. There's no evidence that those
things are linked together. The best part of it is, is it
has nothing to do with what's going on in the United States.
For all of their anger, world coal use sets an all time high
use International Energy, the International Energy Agency said
on Wednesday. And it's all but certain to be
the hottest year in recorded history, despite calls for
humanities to halt burning the filthiest fossil fuel, driving
climate change, they say, with no sense of irony and 00
implications that there may be some contention there.
Energy walk jaws expect that global demand for coal will
continue to reach record highs for the third year in a row.
Scientists warn that planet warming greenhouse gases will
have to be dramatically slashed to limit global heating to avoid
catastrophic impacts on the Earth.
And humanity, remember which one is first?
It's really important that we protect Mother Guy Earth, these
pagans say, and humanity second. Now, why on earth would these
people be using more coal? And what can we do about it here
as good Americans? How do we fix this?
Well, it turns out it would be dependent on China, which for
the past quarter century has consumed 30% more coal than the
rest of the world's countries combined.
I'm going to say that one more time because it's about four
paragraphs deep and below the fold.
It would be dependent on China, which for the past quarter
century has consumed 30% more coal than the entire rest of the
world combined. 30% more. Why?
They're the biggest user. You think that we have any
ability to affect whether or not China is going to use coal?
No, we do not. Their demand for electricity,
which is the most significant driving force, has caused the
increase, and they've burnt a third more than the entire world
carbonized in their power plants.
Beijing has sought to diversify its electrical sources with a
massive expansion of solar and wind, but it's still going to
hit 4.9 billion tons, which itself is another record and
also has no causal ability to say whether or not it is.
So the United States has no ability to affect this.
That's the best part. The other thing is for all of
your climate Pagan friends out there that are talking about can
we get electric cars, we all need to do this thing.
How do they think that those electric cars are charged?
Apparently people have never thought of this.
It's amazing. People in my own circle have not
paid attention to how in the world the electricity is
generated. Unless you are looking at a
electric power plant that's running off nothing but solar
and wind, which is basically none of them, unless you have
nuclear energy, which is a possibility in some parts of the
area that you are. A lot of them are going to be
either come from coal or natural gas.
They are going to be burning. That's right, fossil fuels.
So the fossil fuels, here's how we want our fossil fuels.
We want them laundered to us in the same way we want kind of
fake information laundered to us in the same way that we believe
that the government is the right solution.
I'm just talking on behalf of the political left here.
It has to be laundered to you. They have to burn the fossil
fuel or, or what otherwise ignite it.
Then it has to turn turbines or whatever they're doing, whether
it be melting, you know, pushing water up and then steam and so
on. They have to do something that's
going to turn, something that's going to take the potential
energy in the fossil fuel into kinetic energy.
Then they have to store that in some sort of a battery or some
sort of harnessing device. Then they're going to send it
across wires and there's a drop in energy every single time you
do it. And once it's been transmitted
all the distance from wherever that power plant exists to
wherever you are, then they're going to take it and they're
going to load it into a battery. And the battery is going to take
it, and then it's going to transmit it into your car, into
the wheels. Or you can have that power plant
under the hood. That's what an engine is.
Yes, there's a refinery process, but that happens for all the
other things too. It's like, how have people not
figured out how this all works? Maybe it's because the very,
very serious journalists that are out there are trying to sell
us something that's false. They're trying to push agenda
over reality. I got a good example of that.
It's from MSNBC. It is fantastic.
It is another concern to why Donald Trump will not be a
unifier. This is Nicole Hannah Jones.
You'll know her from being a famous racist and writing a
thing called the 1619 Project, which is not factually accurate.
It doesn't have to even be true, but it is her feelings about how
some things in history could be slanted so that we can have
important conversations. Not factually accurate
conversations, but important once nonetheless.
Kind of like getting rid of fossil fuels.
The other thing that we need to do is get more racism because
racism fuels an entire industry of dumb people that don't have a
job otherwise. But remember, Donald Trump is
dangerous. We have to go ahead and talk
about this. This is why he can't unify us.
It turns out he can't unify us because we have people like this
that refuse to actually join the rest of us in reality and say
that 2024 America and 2025 USA in the future, in addition to
maybe having a 51st Canadian state also doesn't have this
surplus of racism. It just doesn't exist in the
same way that we can't affect fossil fuels.
But also journalists. Here they are.
By asking you, you know, at this point, it might even be somewhat
of a badge of honor that the 16/19/19 project has basically
been singled out by Donald Trump in terms of he's threatening to
stop funding to schools that engage that as part of their
curriculum. What does that say to you?
Not just as the creator of the project, but as someone whose
background is rooted in journalism and storytelling and
truth telling. Well, I think what it says to me
is that we are facing an epic battle in the next 4 years with
an administration that we know. I mean, as you just laid out,
has a history of attacking journalists, of calling for
violence against journalists, of suing journalists, of
surveilling journalists and also seeking to legislate against the
work of journalists, which is what Trump tried to do with the
1619 project. No, he just thought that you're
garbage. Remember, the word journalist
can be synonymous with priests. They are the acolytes that serve
the sort of the ministers of government.
The whole point is they really want people to be able to listen
to the good word that they are preaching.
And you cannot question it in any way, shape or form.
If you do, you are a a heretic. And heretics have to be
excommunicated. They have to be removed from
polite society and they are very, very bad people.
And so if you happen to be some of those people that make a lot
of money and you want to get behind Donald Trump, then you're
part of the problem. This is the last little clip I
have here from Rob Reich. He's the former labor secretary.
The best thing about him is he's a multimillionaire.
All estimates that I could find online said his net worth is
between 4:00 and $5,000,000. He is going to tell you, though,
that is a former government official.
As a professor and as an author, he is very much in touch with
the everyday man like you, the everyday woman who lives in real
America. And that's why Elon Musk is a
real big problem. I don't know if you guys seen
Elon Musk, but I would hang out with him over this guy every
day. So here's the last little Ted
again. It's always about the same weird
narrative that our billionaires are good, our millionaires are
good, and everybody else is bad. If they don't agree with us,
it's religious. I think the biggest problem with
having so many billionaires at the top of government is that
billionaires don't exactly know how a normal people live.
But secondly, and perhaps more importantly, the way people get
to the top of the Trump administration is by providing a
lot of money. I mean, Elon Musk contributed.
The latest data I've seen say that Elon Musk contributed
something in the order of $277 million.
And he goes on to talk about how that's a really good return on
investment. I'm sure Elon Musk does things
only thinking about money. That doesn't seem to be the
case. Even if it tends to work out his
way. Sometimes things in the in the
world actually work out in our favor.
Doesn't mean he's a good actor all the time, but a lot of the
stuff he's done have been objectively good at sort of
breaking down some of these nonsensical narratives.
All right, that's what I've got for today.
I actually have some more things we'll cover down on, but we'll
just do it tomorrow. We're going to talk about Luigi
with the squeegee Maggione and how he's being sort of
worshipped as a cult. Why it's going to be difficult
for people in New York to be able to convict him.
There's some reasons why they're going to have trouble.
They actually probably overcharged him with what they
did. So all of that tomorrow, stick
around for that. We'll be doing the call in show.
If you want to be part of that where you can discuss the things
that you guys are interested in, we'll do it on Thursday.
It's Thursday nights at 8 Eastern.
That's 7 Central. And we do the call in show over
at local. So go to kyleseraphin.com, Kyle
seraphin.com in order to join us on locals and you can be a
subscriber to be able to be part of it.
I got a palate cleanse for you today.
That's just a good reminder from a former Navy SEAL.
His name is Chad Wright and he's kind of just saying it without
saying it. You can carry a gun because
you're an American, because you have certain liberties that are
not dependent on politicians. Which is a short way of saying
no matter what state you live in, carry a gun and don't be a
bitch. Which is kind of like what the
meme says here. He is telling people he doesn't
give a crap about what the gun laws are.
This is the America that we need to go back to in 2025.
The right to keep and bear arms. I'm going to carry my freaking
gun however I want to. That's correct.
You think I need your permit to conceal carry my gun?
Screw you. I will disregard any law that
goes against my fundamental rights as an American citizen.
I carry guns everywhere I go across state lines.
I don't give a crap. I don't even look at the law.
And I may wind up in prison one day.
I don't freaking know, but I don't care because I will not
obey a law that violates my right to keep and bear arms.
And here's the second thing for you listeners.
If you do not carry a gun as an American citizen every single
day, everywhere you go, you are neglecting your duty as an
American citizen. You are failing to exercise your
rights. And actually, I would go as too
far as to say one of your most important rights, rights.
So if you aren't carrying a gun, if you're listening to this,
look at yourself right now. If you are not carrying a gun or
you are not within arm's reach of a gun, you are wrong.
You are dead wrong. Guess what, man?
That's it man. Go out and be protectors.
Women, protect yourself. Hinge against all kinds of
retarded things that are going on in the world.
This is Christmas. That means that people are going
to act stupidly. Maybe you can also wish them the
grace and peace of the one true Savior in the season instead of
doing the Merry Christmas. I Merry Christmas someone from
Chase Bank the other day and it was a nice thing to do.
All right, God bless all of you. I hope that you have a better
weather than we're having here in Texas and I look forward to
seeing you again tomorrow morning on Thursday here on the
Kyle Seraphin show. Make sure you share this
episode. Give us a comment and I will see
you then. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Seraphin show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth
Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.