Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth, because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Sarrif. Hello my friends.
Welcome to the Kyle Sarrif and Show.
Finally, Finally we are up and rolling.
I'm sure it had nothing to do with us.
I'm sure it was just one of those lovely technical glitches
that just happens to happen on occasion.
Ryan just got back from the border so he is joining us
today. He's trying to stream, man, we
we tried this folks. I'm telling you, we started
launching this thing 5 minutes before our normal time only to
find out that we were going to be running 25 minutes late.
As you are seeing us live now, if you are not watching our
rumble channel and if you just happen to be tuning into the
audio or if you're watching this on replay, what you missed was.
A lot of mess. We saw some dark streams, we saw
some audio only we saw some nothing.
We had to restart the stream. So many of you are seeing this
in a weird delay. And of course we lost most of
our audience there. But so be it.
Some of you are worried about my mood and offered me peanuts.
I actually keep my own peanuts. I keep my own peanuts right here
on the desk, just in case. So we are rocking and rolling
here. It is August the 16th, it is a
Wednesday and we are going live from Liberty Hill, TX right now,
just about 25 minutes late. Sorry about all of those things.
We will do our best. Again, we're going to be talking
about counterintelligence today. I'm sure that's not a triggering
topic for the FBI. We're going to be talking about
counterintelligence agents, what they do.
What kind of cases have been run?
Couple of them that are notable that have been prosecuted
already that I can talk about. We're going to go through the
indictment of Charles Mcgonigle. We're going to be talking about
the one that he just pled guilty to and what he has not pled
guilty to yet. And we'll find out what that's
all about. It seems like the media it tends
to either be distracted by shiny objects or they are running top
cover and I can't tell which. Either one is plausible in this
sort of mainstream media Operation Mockingbird scenario,
something that that seems to be. Seems to be going on with a lot
of this stuff. I'm seeing a lot of media
obsession with things that are not the real story.
So we're going to dig into that just a little bit.
And we're going to talk about, we're going to talk about the
contrast of the previously top FBI violator of the oath, let's
say in in Robert Hansen. All right.
Before we do that, let's say thanks to Catholic Vote, those
people are keeping the lights on here.
And you know what's fun? Catholic Vote actually had a
mishap this morning as well. There is no loop.
In my e-mail, despite the fact that I promised you a loop every
day, if you sign up for the loop, there's no loop in the
e-mail. And I went into the Slack chat
for the Catholic Vote folks. I have an e-mail address with
them and I I get to peripherally be involved in the organization.
And I looked in there and there were 20 people saying, where's
the loop? So in the same way that you were
wondering, where's the Kyle Sarafin show?
They were wondering, where's the loop?
Here they are. Check them out.
You'll get the loop tomorrow, I guess.
Maybe it'll come later on in the day.
Maybe you can sign up in time to get today's loop.
Go to catholicvote.org, Catholic vote.
That's VOTE catholicvote.org. Put in your e-mail address, your
name, your zip code, and get the e-mail.
When they send it. And they blamed it on a new guy,
that's what they're saying. New guy was running the
scheduling program and it failed to send, so maybe it will send a
little bit later in the day. That being said.
Great people. We do appreciate them and we're
going to have some new promos for our friends over at Patriot
Coolers, but check them out as well.
Go to patriotcoolers.com. Use promo code Kyle Kyle.
Promo code Kyle, get you 10% off.
There's some of the cool stuff that they have as far as the
first responder and veteran gifts.
Good looking flags specific to EMS, to law enforcement, to
those who have been in the military.
Here is one of my Patriot coolers.
My wife loaded this one up. This one's got a sticker of my
buddy Soft Unit over in the Air Force.
That's my dead air sticker because I like dead air.
Suppressors rolled with me in a lot of states.
That thing has been with me probably in 18 or 20 different
states, Maybe more at this point because I take a Patriot cooler
with me when I travel. Use promo code, Kyle.
Get your own promo code. Kyle gets you a 10% off free
shipping over 50 bucks. You guys know the deal.
All right. See a lot of you guys sending
the the Super chats over there, sending the rumble rants.
Baby's going to get new shoes. Baby is not here yet, folks.
Baby is pending. The baby is pending.
Let's go ahead and launch into the show here.
Without any further ado, let's talk about Operation Grey Day,
which was the Robert Hanson case and code name Werewolf, which
sounds really lame. Will you bring up topic #1,
Ryan, and let's rock'n'roll. This was an article that was
written on spyscape.com. You can see their generic sort
of just footage of FBI agents moving things out of a box.
I don't know why they always think people are taking.
Why would you take a computer monitor?
It's a silly picture that looks staged on every level.
There is nothing in the computer monitor that we are taking.
I don't need that computer monitor.
This is the story of of FBI agent Eric O'Neill, who was
recruited when he was a new agent.
What are the stories that happened?
What are the issues that happened when you have a mole
hunt internally? Is that you got to figure out?
Is there a way? To get involved with the agent
who is in fact selling out the FBI without alerting them.
And generally speaking the problem is, is that they're they
usually have a lot of friends. I know that Charlie Mcgonigal
situation was a lot of people owed him favors.
A lot of people owed him some pieces of their career.
As we heard from our friend Steve Gray on this very program,
Steve Gray who used to work with him both at headquarters and the
New York field office. Steve said that Charlie
Mcgonigal was really big on collecting favors.
What he would do is he would find a disciplinary action that
should have been taken and he would kind of give that person
to pass, knowing that they would owe him something in the future.
And that can be a good management technique.
It can be shady. In the case of Mcgonigal, it
sounds like it was nothing but shadiness.
So if if we Scroll down through this article, what we find out
is that they basically went out and recruited this guy Eric
O'Neill and they gave him code name Werewolf because of
apparently something he did at the Quantico bar.
Many, many careers launched with shady stories at the boardroom,
as they call it, the bar at Quantico.
Apparently this guy was throwing his head back and howling at the
moon. So that gave him this, this
nickname of werewolf. And and then Grade A was the
call sign for the case. And the reason I tell you the
call sign specifically is that everybody in the FBI thinks that
they're doing really cool stuff catching spies.
They all want to have code name cases.
And, you know, it's things like angry snail or, you know, fiery
squirrel. They have these silly things.
They have lists. I've seen them.
There's automatic generated case names that you can have and the
computer spits them out. Or what they'll have is agents
will just sit around when they're doing nothing because
it's standard federal work. And they will literally like
game out. What will be the code name of my
cool case that I get and how? And you know what sounds the
coolest? It's as nerdy as you think it
is. I mean, it literally is as nerdy
as it sounds. So Operation Gray Day was.
Was the the, the operation that went against O'Neill.
Here's the other funny thing, everybody always wants to trump
up their capabilities. We're going to be having a
really interesting interview and I hopefully this not interrupted
by some of the weird technical glitches we had today.
We're going to be interviewing somebody in Moscow this
afternoon. Ryan and I will and we'll try to
play it for you tomorrow. That's going to be the plan and.
The surveillance specialists that work for the FBI, I was an
agent specialist. We call them SOG, or the Special
Operations Group. They used to be called Mobile
Surveillance. Something Mobile Surveillance
team. ARM Mobile Surveillance Team not
armed. They have these different names.
There are two different varieties of it.
Some of them are armed, they're agents, some of them are
security specialists or surveillance specialists and
they love to call themselves the Ghosts.
I've seen this in multiple different articles.
By the way, nobody in the FBI calls them Ghosts.
They're known as SSG and they are a mixture of young capable
people who have no work experience that go to a like a
12 week surveillance course. And they learn how to follow
people around that aren't armed and are not dangerous, and
theoretically they're just gathering intelligence on them.
And then the other group of them are people that are armed.
We have a much shorter Academy because surveillance is actually
kind of part of the the the regular FBI Academy.
And so we go through and we follow people that are armed and
and people that are potentially dangerous.
And so we can have national security targets on occasion,
generally not. But if you happen to have like,
let's say a Green Beret who's doing something and and giving
away information, that's just something off the top of my head
that I remember we worked. If you have another law
enforcement officer that's involved in potentially doing
some national security. Failings.
If they work for another agency, if they work for the FBI, then
you'd tend to get the you'd end up with the agents on it because
that person may actually have a gun.
But they love to call these people ghosts.
They like to have these cool case names.
And I'm saying all this because a lot of this stuff is cosplay.
If you've listened to the show, you know that a lot of what the
FBI does is federal law enforcement cosplay and the
danger of cosplay that has real guns.
With this sort of silly attitude and this danger is that or this
sort of loose grip on what it is that they're actually doing, is
that sometimes they actually do get into the real scenario.
And if you were following the chat and our our previous
stream, which we had to reboot, Gerda Boyle came in and told us
that his friends who are in Memphis got an e-mail today, the
FBI has killed yet another person.
It'll probably be justified. That's usually how it works.
It's almost always justified when the SWAT teams get into a
shooting. But the question should really
be, are they provoking it through some of this cosplay by
showing up and kicking down doors, like they think there's
some sort of elite counterterrorism for.
So they're, you know, they're, they're SEAL Team 6 overseas.
Why are we going into these houses at 06 AM?
It never made sense at the Academy.
In fact, the legal instructors that I had, a guy named Mike
Bulzomi who was kind of legendary for sitting at the
Academy forever, he was one of those great presenters.
He said, why is it that we always go into houses at 6:00
AM? And the answer he answered his
own question was. Because.
Because that's what we've always done, because the FBI gets
involved in doing the same thing that they've always done.
That's cosplay that is playing instead of adapting to modern
techniques. Whereas most SWAT teams are now
involved in surrounding call out, the FBI is still kicking
down doors and going after people and and it's incredibly
dangerous. And of course it's resulted in
in the last seven days, literally today is Wednesday.
So in the last seven days we have had three people killed by
the FBI. And I would not be surprised to
find more of this. Part of that is the political
culture that we have going on and part of it is because they
won't adapt their techniques. So we'll talk a little further
about Hanson here. If you guys don't know the story
of Robert Hanson, he started spying on the FBI for the
Russians at least as early as 1985 and he got people killed.
He was giving information over the K GB and he continued doing
this after the fall of the Soviet Union under the the the
Russian Federation. He killed.
He like, got people killed. And he kept doing this for his
whole career. And the reason that they ended
up having this rush is because they were afraid he was going to
be able to retire before they were able to get him.
Does that sound familiar? It should sound familiar because
a story of Charlie Mcgonigal is they didn't get him until after.
They didn't get him until much further after.
He was already outside of the FBI.
Are we not concerned about this? Let's go on to the topic #2
here. This is the the story.
Robert Hanson died in prison, folks.
That's what it comes down to. Okay he.
He died in prison. And the only way that they were
able to catch him was after almost 20 years of him leaking
top secrets, top secret information to the Russians.
The the FBI is not good at this, you know.
And this is the thing that should most, most people should
be most concerned about. They have this is telling you
that in December of 2000, there's this FBI agent, Richard
Garcia. He gets a visit from somebody at
the Russia desk saying, hey, hey, you know Robert Hanson, you
know him no good, because you're about to.
They had to literally go through the Bureau and find people that
didn't know the guy. In order to do this operation,
what you're seeing on the screen right now is that is reporting
from the BBC that they're letting us know that, you know,
this is an old case. Obviously this happened, but
they're still reporting on it because we're dealing with the
the new story of our man, Charlie Mcgonigal.
Will you pull up? I'm going to skip ahead a little
bit here. Will you pull up the New York
indictment? That is going to be topic #5.
I want to read from the New York indictment, folks.
This is the one that we just heard that just got pled out.
He's facing up to five years based on what he pled to.
But I want to read the indictment here and what it does
and what it doesn't say because the media is covering this like
this is all of the the case over Charlie Mcgonigal.
They're acting like this is the entirety of what went down and
that he's now going to be just facing the sentencing.
That is not the case. All right, So let's bring this
up here. So Charles Mcgonigal and his
codefendant, whose name was Sergey.
Let me try this again. Shostovskov.
Shit, Stahkov. Sorry Sergei, I'm going to Jack
your name up but doesn't sound like you're a great guy.
Mcgonigle. Obviously former senior
official. He was the the special agent in
charge of counterintelligence at the New York field office
dealing with with CI cases. Literally in charge of running
spy anti spy operations in New York.
And and his his comrade here. Sergei was a former Soviet and
Russian diplomat going all the way back until like I think
1979. It's actually listed here in the
indictment. And the story goes like this.
They're buddies. And he's approached, they say,
beginning in 2016 until his retirement, he served as a
special agent in charge of New York's counterintelligence
division. But before that, he was working
at headquarters with our friend Steve Gray.
And he was working in some other places.
He worked Russian counterintelligence.
He was working all the cases that were out of there and so.
He had access to all of the information, classified lists of
Russian oligarchs who had ties to the Kremlin, people who are
being considered for sanctions going back to the 2014
international agreement that the US signed on to to to ban
transactions by these by these oligarchs.
And and his buddy started working for the Soviet Union in
1979, retired from the Russian Federation in 1993, end up
living in Connecticut in the United States, becoming a
naturalized citizen. Some of that's kind of
interesting. And then the other piece of it
that I found very interesting in this indictment, which I'm not
hearing a whole lot about, is the fact that this guy was
working as a translator in the federal court system.
I'm sure he speaks great Russian and English.
But we don't have any problem with a guy that had loyalties
and worked on behalf of the USSR and then the Russian Federation
coming and working in the US court system and working for the
United States Attorney's office in the Southern and Eastern
District of New York. You want to talk about
penetration? This is what it looks like.
Some of it is a self induced wound.
We allow these people to come in and do work.
I don't know how well the the vetting process works, but
apparently it doesn't work enough to keep a guy who's at
the top of the counterintelligence pool.
For the New York field office, which is the biggest field
office in the FBI, they they refer to themselves as as the
most important. They are right, you know, neck
and neck with Washington field office only because Washington
has all the stuff that goes on in Washington.
All the embassies and all the consulates are in New York and
so on. So the the Russian that he's
accused of dealing with his O log Deripaska, he's Russian
national. He's referred to as an oligarch
meaning a lot of wealth and close ties to the Russian state.
I'm I'm just scanning here through this indictment for you
guys to understand what they actually alleged.
Here's the actual sanctions we're talking about
International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the i.e.
EPA Codified under Title 50 of the United States Code, Section
1701 through 08. And they confer authority on the
president to deal with basically unusual and extraordinary
threats to national security and foreign policy.
They allow them to basically outlaw the movement of monies
and and and certain interests, financial interests, to people
that are deemed threats to the state.
They did this in 2014 under Obama when he failed to handle
Ukraine and Russia properly, and they had the first Russian grab
of Ukrainian territories. So this actually all kind of
runs together in what's going on now.
This was an emergency order by the president blocked all
property and interests that were going to be coming within the
United States and therefore within the possession of control
of the United States person. OK, this is where we're going.
the United States person, in this case, Charlie Mcgonigal,
probably also dealing with his buddy Sergey.
So the executive order produced the the distribution
contribution of funds, goods, or services to, for, or by the
benefit of any person whose property or interest are on the
block list. In this case, Deripaska.
All right. So that's the that's the the the
statute that's in play. That is the the allegation that
he was basically in violation of.
And what they do say is that he was connected to and moving
money around on behalf of this this this guy, Sergey, which was
benefiting this prohibited person.
They they have all these different things.
Deripaska was listed as Agent One.
I'm sorry, he was an agent of Deripaska, not actually
Deripaska specifically, but some of the stuff that's in here is
pretty wild, says. In 2019, he'd already retired
from the FBI, sought to retain law enforcement work under
sanctions. He was trying to get Deripaska
delisted from that, that particular sanctions document,
trying to keep him from having this financial, this financial
block that the United States had on him.
And the other thing he was trying to do is he was trying to
get the FBI to investigate. Deripaska's rival and find out
where he had $500 million set. That seems like a real problem,
trying to use the United States federal resources and you're
abusing your position inside the FBI in the counterintelligence
field where you had access to see everything.
He wanted to use that to go find Deripaska's rivals money.
So there's an engagement letter here between this law firm and
Deripaska saying that he's going to pay the law firm $175,000 per
month. $25,000 currently earmarked for certain other
professionals. These are direct quotes.
The law firm then retained Mcgonigal Okay.
So you see the cut out we're talking about?
He's going through the law firm. End of the day.
He ends up pleading guilty to this.
He pleads guilty to violation of that sanction.
He ends up pleading guilty to money laundering charges which
may result in up to five years in prison.
But what you're hearing the media say, what you're hearing
them say? Is that somehow this actually is
the totality of the case. What we heard was this really
solicious story about an Albanian former intelligence
official bringing bags of cash to an FBI special agent in
charge in New York. You remember that story?
That's the story that we keep hearing about.
That's the way the media is covering this story.
And those charges have not been pled to yet.
So you're getting this false story if you'll bring up.
Let me see, where's the? Breaking 911.
Bring up a topic #4, if you would.
Let's bring that article up because I want you to see how
it's covered and what it didn't, what it didn't cover.
So this is breaking911.com. This is the basic story that
you've heard. And what they're saying is, is
that he pled guilty to money laundering connections in his
2021 agreement, provided services to Deripaska, this
Russian oligarch, blah blah blah, they say here.
Here's the United States Attorney Damian Williams saying.
After his tenure as a highlevel FBI official who supervised and
participated in investigations of Russian oligarchs, Charles
Mcgonigal has now admitted that he agreed to evade U.S.
sanctions by providing services to one of those oligarchs, Ola
Dare Pasco. This office will continue to
hold those hold to account those who violate U.S. sanctions for
their own financial benefits. Okay Fine, the special agent
charged in in New York. The sorry, the assistant
director in charge over there says something like.
Economic sanctions are a critical component of US
National Security. They must be fully and fairly
applied. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
He tried to evade these serious criminal offense by entering a
guilty plea. He's accepted responsibility for
his actions. They are now committed to
rigorously investigating and reporting sanctions violations.
OK, so everybody did the right thing.
Everybody's an honorable person. Where do you hear in that about
the $225,000 that was that was alleged to be handed over in
$85,000 increments? You hear anything about it in
there? There's some back story here
about the the, the case in the indictment.
None of those things have anything to do with what is
going on with the 225, the Albanian and the trips to Kosovo
and so on that we talked about on Monday, right?
None of those things are what our interview with Alison
Guerrero was talking about. None of them.
And that's because there's a there's a second indictment and
the other indictment is sitting in the District of District of
Columbia. So let's pull that up.
That is going to be topic number six, my friend, if you'll pull
up that indictment, that's where the real dirty stuff comes in.
But I what I'm wondering is, are we going to hear more about this
or only are we only going to see the the hidden materials?
Are we going to try to see a media cover that says, look,
it's over, it's old news, he's already pled guilty.
So it's going on. You know, we're going to hear
over and over again about President Donald Trump and the
things that he was involved in, but we are not going to hear
probably much about this one. And in this case, this is yet
another ridiculous piece. He's charged with 1001
concealment of material facts, 1001 false statements and 1519
falsification of a record or document.
Do you hear anything in there about the receiving of money and
using his position for influence or going out and attempting to
abuse his authorities as an FBI senior counterintelligence
official? Because I don't, not in this
particular piece. Let's let's go into the the the
facts here, because I think the facts that they record do not
get reflected very often in what we in in what we just heard
there. Count 1 beginning no later than
August 2017, continuing thereafter to at least May 6th
of 2019. By the way that and covers the
time before he retired he was working for the FBI.
There, Charles Mcgonigal did knowingly and willingly falsely
conceal or cover and cover up by trick, scheme or device material
Facts, namely, consistently held aspects of his relationship with
Person A that he had a duty to disclose, to create an actual
and an apparent conflict of interest between his official
FBI duties and his private interests, including that he
accepted more than $225,000 from Person A.
They're charging him with concealing material facts, a
1001, a very, very light felony. This is the same as lying to the
FBI. That's what they're going to
accuse him of. What about the money he traveled
to Europe with Person A? He had ongoing foreign
relationships with foreign nationals that you are required
to disclose. There's just one count here.
When we see things going after President Trump, they want to
charge him for every single statement that he made as a
false statement. And in this case, we have years
of false statements that were put out by Charlie Mcgonigal and
money and illicit travel. None of those things make any
sense. And he's getting a false
statement charge. He's getting a 1001 violation
charge. I'm going to give you the actual
execution of the scheme here. This goes on to this is
paragraph 18 says no later than August 2017, defendant Mcgonigal
met with person A again. This is the Albanian
intelligence officer required and inquired whether person A
could provide him with money. In September of 2017, the
defendant submitted an FD772 for upcoming unofficial travel to
Albania. Now when you work for the
federal government in a national security position, doesn't
matter if you work for the military, you work for a law
enforcement agency, or if you work for the State Department,
you have to file these forms when you want to travel,
particularly outside of the country.
What he did on this particular filing of the 772 is he failed
to identify the person A would be his traveling companion.
He failed to state that the lodging and accommodations would
be provided free of charge and the person that would be paying
them was in fact connected to the Albanian government.
He failed to the state that he'd be going to Kosovo in addition
to Albania. And he did not identify the
anticipated reportable foreign contacts, including Person B and
some other foreign nationals with whom he had ongoing
relationships. You can't maintain foreign
relationships. In fact, if you would move a new
roommate in and you have a top secret clearance, you have to
report on who that person is. You have to file that.
If you marry a foreign national, if you are friends with a
foreign national, if you have a business meal where you sit
down, have a a nice discussion with somebody from a foreign
country and you realize they are of that foreign country, you're
required to disclose that under the terms.
That's what a little guy like me would have had to do, as in as
someone working for the FBI, if one of my friends decided to
marry a foreign national and I was going to see them in any
ongoing contact. If I was going to go there, I
would have to report that. And this guy is out there flying
to Albania and Kosovo and not telling that the somebody else
is paying for his trip and his lodgings.
Isn't that interesting? And yet we're only dealing with
false statements. These are the lightest charges
you can imagine on this stuff. All right.
On this again in September, it says that he discussed working
for money with this individual and person A said he could
provide McConnell little by little.
We don't know. That's not a direct quote.
So I don't know where they got little by little ongoing, you
continue. He ends up going there and makes
arguments on behalf of a Chinese energy conglomerate.
We don't know which one specifically, but the belief is
it's CFSCEFC. So he goes on and he's dealing
with the Prime Minister of Albania.
He's meeting with Person B. They're talking about drilling
rights. They're talking about Chinese
interests trying to keep Russian companies from getting oil field
licenses in Albania. All the stuff is acting on
behalf of a foreign nation and representing interests that are
nonamerican While he's on this unofficial business trip, I
don't see any of that. Then we get to the substance of
it. You go down to paragraph 26
October 2017, outside a restaurant, in a parked car in
New York City. Defendant Mcgonigal receives
approximately $80,000 in cash from Person A.
And then later on in the fall, So somewhere in that same time
frame at the Person A's residence in New Jersey, he
receives cash payments again in the amount of 80,000 and
$65,000. I want to talk about
transactional espionage money with you.
There's a certain amount of money.
We talked about it a little bit on Monday in the interview with
Allison. There's a certain amount of
money that is too much and there's a certain amount of
money that is too little to be known as transactional espionage
money. I've run this by other people.
This is not just coming from my time at Washington field office.
Other people have found this to be the case.
If you receive a few $1000, it's not enough necessarily to sell
out and be considered money. That's for state secrets.
People are not going to assume risk for 5000 or $8000.
Generally speaking, that's not going to be the case.
They'd have to be pretty desperate and pretty low level.
And that's not the kind of person that Charlie Mcgonigle
was. He was a much higher level than
that. Now if you're talking about
probably 6 figures, 100 and 5200 and 5300 and $50,000, that's too
much money for transactional espionage.
The the idea is, is that people feed a certain amount of of
secret and they get a certain amount of money that goes on and
on. When you get the big payouts,
that's almost always a relocation or an end of service
or this is the culmination of a relationship and I'm demanding
that final payoff because that person knows they've just
assumed the maximum amount of risk.
This usually goes into the millions, the amount of money
that Robert Hansen is accused of receiving.
This is obviously in 1985 money to 2000.
It's like $1.5 million total. So very, very low just entering
into that seven figure amount. This is transactional dollars,
fifty and sixty $80,000 at a time.
This was the kind of money that Hanson was seeing adjusted for
inflation. You bump it up 8090 hundred
$1000 right around that that that amount of money, that's
transactional espionage money. That's what we would expect to
see someone who is trading US secrets, not influence of their
position, using their position to be able to to to exploit the
secrets that they had access to. And what we are not seeing are
any charges along that line for Charlie Mcgonigal and a five
year sentence. Remember Robert Hanson died in
prison. He was convicted in the early
2000s and he died in prison. I think he died this year.
But if not it was late last year.
That's a pretty new story. We actually have Robert Hanson
died in prison. You can actually have it up
here. Yep.
This is actually from this year, June, June 5th is when it was
reported that you can actually bring that up.
That is topic #3 Ryan. So you can see he died in June
of this year in prison, 79 years old, apparently very fat and
very unhappy, a very disgraced human being who spent 20 years
in prison. That's Robert Hanson's story.
And obviously people died because of what he was doing.
And that may be the case, a slight differential between what
we're talking about here. But the idea that you would use
your position in order to to make this, this, you know, this
kind of money that should be really troubling to everybody.
It also tells you what kind of a clown game is going on over the
FBI that they didn't sniff this guy out.
And honestly, the fact that Hanson was doing this from 1985
until 2001 should make you very concerned that they were
allowing the stuff to go on all the way through the fall of the
Soviet Union. If you'll bring up topic #13 for
me, I want to discuss another little case here, folks.
This is a case that I actually ended up working on.
This is over. Now.
It's it's over and done with. This former State Department
employee sentence for comps firing with Chinese agents.
I did limited work on this. I was part of the search warrant
that searched the the House of Candace Claiborne.
She worked for the State Department.
As I understood it, she was like a secretarial type, but it also
done some time overseas and she was involved in receiving money,
favors, gifts and favorable consideration by the Chinese
Communist Party for things that she was doing on behalf of them.
She had a low level, you know, she had the same clearance, but
she was a low level employee regarding that.
And one of the things that I had to do was I actually translated
the entirety, sorry, not translated transcribe, the
entirety of a false flag operation that was done.
They ran an undercover to her house, banged on the door,
pretended to be a Chinese person that was friends with the people
that were supposedly the Chinese agents that were working with
her. And she invited this person
right in. We had no idea that was going to
happen. So this person was wired up and
ended up talking. She ended up giving him all
kinds of information. The the crazy stuff about this
story was and she ended up getting 40 months in prison.
So she's probably it's 2019. She's probably right on the edge
of getting out now. She may have gotten out for
early release, so she may have already been released for this.
She was entrusted with privileged information.
Like all U.S. government employees, she had that secret
clearance, the top secret clearance rather and had access
to printers and things like that.
She chose to betray the American trust and you know the
accountability was basically 40 months.
Now, she was nowhere nearly as highly placed as someone like
like our buddy Charlie Mcgonigal.
But what she did have was a son who got admission into college.
He was homosexual and got himself involved in some really
dangerous activities, sexual activities overseas.
And so he was facing indictment overseas and the Chinese let him
slide specifically because of this connection, because of the
the relationship that she had developed with them.
So they actually use that over her.
And when you're compromised, the first thing that's trouble,
Ryan, are we still doing that? We still have the press release
up. Yeah, you can throw it down.
The, the thing about being compromised is this.
Once that someone gives you money, I want you to think about
this. You've received money, cash.
Maybe that's deniable at some point.
As that goes on, they now probably have a documentation of
it. We've heard about this in the
10/23 with the Biden administration, the idea that
these people were buying off Hunter Biden and Joe Biden and
they kept a record of it. You don't want to give money
like cash as a business over to someone and not be able to get
the thing that you paid for. And that's the problem with
cash. It's gone unless you documented
that meeting, unless you recorded it, unless you have
something that will show what was going on, whether they be
emails, whether they be text messages, phone calls and so on,
saying that you got the thing you want.
The leverage that they had in, in this case of this this woman
who's working on behalf of the Chinese was that her son was
facing prosecution and he was basically stuck overseas until
she did what they wanted. They let her go, but then they
always know that about her and they can always go back and show
the paper trail to the US government so they can use that
to further exploit you. Once you allow yourself, you
open the door up to exploitation, then you are
always open to exploitation. This is what the concern should
be about Charles Mcgonigal, and it's a biblical piece.
People who could be trusted in small matters can be trusted in
great matters. People who are not trustworthy
in small matters also not trustworthy in great matters.
So we know that this guy was willing to take money, that he
was willing to compromise his ethics, that he was willing to
go and work against US interest, that he was willing to lie to
his own agency, falsify forms. So then the question should
always be what else was out there.
And if you think that there was this like very competent
investigation, you remember how big Hansen was.
There were two big spies that were caught Alter James and
Robert Hansen. They had a big trial and they
were sentenced for the rest of their lives.
That was it. Life in prison, you don't get
out. There was treasonous behavior
and they were prosecuted under the Espionage Act.
I don't see anything mentioned about that in this case.
And yet he was using his official position.
He was using his ability to gather information at the
highest level of the the counterintelligence sphere.
You don't even have to ask at that level.
Like they don't need need to know.
They're not worried about what keystrokes someone like Kyle
Seraphin or Gerda Boyle or Steve Friend is doing.
When we go and look at a case, even if it's peripherally
related to what we're going, we're working on, there's a
there's going to be a record of it.
We may have to answer questions. Hey saw you were in this file.
Why? Why were you doing that as the
as the chief guy in the New York field office running the
counterintelligence division, that's not coming up.
You're the guy asking the questions.
You're not the guy getting asked questions and the FBI is not
prepared to be able to handle these kind of things.
This is the highest level person who has been accused of
betraying the oath and they're sweeping it under the rug like
it's no big deal 1001 charges and where's the Farrah?
We're hearing a lot about this and this is going to be relevant
because tomorrow hopefully we have the interview with our with
our undisclosed guests. I don't need to have any more
technical difficulties with our stream, but fair violation is
something they're holding over the heads of people like Michael
Flynn, unregistered foreign agent.
And we're hearing a little bit about it and Hunter Biden, but
we're not hearing it in a big way.
How come he's not being charged with Farrah if they're willing
to go after people on the conservative side and with a
Charlie Mcgonigal? He was acting as an unregistered
foreign agent. Did he file fair paperwork?
They love that charge. Right now they're happy to levy
it against people. And yet we're not seeing that.
We're not seeing allegations of espionage, and we're seeing
money that looks an awful lot like transactional espionage.
I'm not the only person that thinks this.
Steve Gray was wondering about it.
Allison from Monday's interview was also talking about it
briefly. These are legitimate, serious
and ongoing concerns. You have to wonder why this guy
is getting the pass. And then we'll contrast it
because we always have to. Let's contrast it with what's
been going on in Trump indictments for now,
indictments. I think there's like 90 counts
going on it. We pull up topic #11 for me,
this is this is MSNBC. They're not just obsessed with
Trump being indicted, they're obsessed with Fox News being
obsessed with Trump. I just pulled this graphic up.
This was just me looking this morning for background research.
Fox News Trump Stockholm syndrome is in full effect after
his fourth indictment. That was the lead story on
there. They can't get enough.
Then you look down. Trump lovers rage over Fox
debate restrictions from an old debate in 2016.
Fox News is getting pummeled by former evangelist and it could
get worse. They love talking about Fox.
Fox is always talking about Trump.
So we are going to just do this nonsense where we're going to
bring up one guy's story and we're not going to talk about
something that is really a legitimate betrayal of the
country. If anybody thinks that the
conspiracy to defraud American voters from an election that he
ended up not getting into the presidency for is the biggest
crime and scandal, I think you're a crazy person.
You don't have to love Donald Trump to look at the the
unfairness that is being waged against the guy.
And in the meantime, why is the media running top cover for the
FBI? And why are we not hearing about
a third person now being shot in seven days?
Shouldn't that be a breaking story everywhere?
How is it that they just sweep the stuff under and they don't
talk about it? We're going to make sure that
people are talking about it. I'm going to make sure that we
share this. And then and the other piece of
it is that they're running people overseas, which we'll be
talking about tomorrow. And that I don't want to tease
it out too far because I want to make sure this thing actually
does happen. The, the interesting thing with
all of the stuff in Trump's indictments is that they are
running both federal charges and state charges.
The obvious danger of a federal indictment for them is that if
he actually wins, he could pardon himself, right.
The state charges are sort of insurance against that.
And so you're seeing all this breathless talk in the media
about how they can do that. If we can bring up, let's see
here, the Mark Meadows situation, What is that from?
That's going to be under topic number, topic #7, if you would,
Ryan. This is coming from a BC news
today. They actually just released this
yesterday. Mark Meadows is seeking to move
his case, the indictment against him from Fulton County, which
was in the Atlanta case here that the sort of prosecutor that
wants to be a budget rate. Cardi B, the Fulton County
election case, they want to move it into federal court.
And there's some really interesting implications for
this. And obviously, I think Trump's
going to probably want to do the same thing.
If they can get all these things out in the open and you know
they'll deal with the the, the present presentation, the
arraignment and so on, they're going to want to try to move
venue. So this this article says former
White House chief of staff Mark Meadows officially filed on
Tuesday to move the case brought against him by the Fulton County
District Attorney Fannie Willis. Again, our our friend the budget
Cardi B into federal court just a day after he was indicted
along with the federal with Trump, President Trump and
seventeen others on charges of attempting to overturn the
election. So 19 different people,
theoretically they can move all these into federal court.
And So what is the argument here?
His attorney says Mr. Meadows, nothing he is alleged to have
done is criminal per se. He's arranging White House
meetings. He is conducting state officials
or contacting them on behalf of the president.
He is visiting a state government building, setting up
phone calls with the president. All things you would expect a
chief of staff for the president of the United States of America
to do. Those are all things that would
make sense. And so why would you do this?
Here's what he's saying. This is precisely the kind of
state interference in a federal officials duties that the
Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution prohibits
and that removal and and the removal statute Shields against
this. So the Supremacy Clause is the
argument they do this in actual in in cases where federal agents
are involved in a shooting and then charged locally with
murder. Many people are never going to
be familiar with this the concept of qualified immunity.
But if you were to go and be a federal agent, whether you be a
TF or DEA or FBI or you name it or HSI or so on, and you carry a
gun for a living and you end up having to shoot somebody.
And what they can do is they can actually charge you locally with
murder or homicide of some kind, right, Second degree, first
degree, third degree. And they can do that.
And the federal government can petition to pull that into
federal courts. They change the venue and then
they can dismiss it under the United States Attorney saying
that you had qualified immunity, but you might otherwise face
state charges. So there is a role for that.
And what you would basically argue is that they were doing
their duty as federal officials. One of the most sort of
interesting versions of this happened when it was either
Border Patrol or somebody under DHS was engaged in a
surveillance from the border. If you listen to our Victor
Avila article or our our interview rather you heard that
he was talking about the functional equivalence of the
border as long as you can maintain eyes on somebody that
is doing smuggling or drug trafficking or gun running or
whatever. And so they had the surveillance
team following someone from Tijuana up the the California
Highway system away from the Mexican border.
And when you're running surveillance, sometimes you're
going to be running directly behind somebody.
Obviously, there's going to have someone who's going to have an
eye on them. But often times what you'll do
is you'll run in parallel and you will parallel these people
on a second Rd. that goes the same direction.
And California, there are multiple northbound highways,
some of which are smaller than others.
I think the person was northbound on the five doing a
standard pursuit and then somebody was on one of the
parallel routes which I cannot remember off the top of my head.
But there's several of them rolling at a very very high rate
of speed 100 miles an hour plus and hit somebody in a T-bone
collision that pulled out into traffic.
The person was correct and turning the the agent was
driving at a very very high rate of speed ended up killing the
person that they T boned and the the state wanted to go after
this agent for doing the job that they were supposed to be
doing. Surveillance is inherently
dangerous when you drive like this and what happened was it
was scoped under the federal employment statute.
They pulled this into federal courts, said this person was
operating in their duty and therefore had qualified immunity
for the the homicide, which would have been negligent
homicide or reckless endangerment or whatever that
the state was trying to charge and that person was not able to
be charged in the state system. This happens all the time.
And the argument is this is supremacy clause, which I think
I have the actual supremacy clause, You guys can see it.
Pull up topic 9 if you would. I think that's going to be it.
Topic 9 is going to give you guys kind of a taste.
Here we go. So the Supremacy Clause is
Article 4. Paragraph two of the United
States Constitution, commonly referred to as the Supremacy
Clause, It establishes that the federal constitution and federal
law more generally take precedent over state laws, even
the state constitution. It prohibits the states from
interfering with the federal government's exercise of
constitutional powers and from assuming any functions that are
exclusively entrusted to the federal government.
In other words, if somebody's executing their duties under
federal law as a federal official, then they are not
beholden to anything that goes on with the state outlaws.
One of the good examples of this, if you were going and
doing a recording of someone that you have the authorization
to do as a federal government employee, even though there may
be a two party consent requirement in the state, you're
in for recording. In other words, I know and you
know that I'm recording. I can still do a one party
consent or a no party consent if I have the right warrants
because the supremacy claw allows me to move beyond what
the state allows in this case. It doesn't allow the federal
government to review or veto state laws before they take
effect. It simply allows them to ignore
them and then they have case precedent that will allow them
to go beyond that. McCullough versus Maryland was
the story where this happened. They were two solicitors that
were going and making an argument, Daniel Webster on
behalf of the federal government and Martin Luther on behalf of
the state of Maryland. And this is where they actually
established this under the Marshall Court.
This is a very old piece of case law that says the federal
government has the ability to do this sort of thing.
And what we have in the case of A of trying to pull these things
away is that is sort of this constitutional argument.
There's a lot of constitutional arguments that are going to come
up with the Trump indictment, and this is one of them.
Can you in fact bring this under federal prosecution and then
make the constitutional arguments that this person was
acting within the scope of their job?
The problem is, is that we have a weaponized DOJ and a Biden
administration that's going to actually argue against that.
And what you may have heard yesterday is that Fannie Willis
was asked very directly and point blank, are you working
with the special counsel Jack Smith, who brought the
indictments in Florida and in the District of DC, the federal
indictments? And she sort of demurred.
She refused to answer such things.
This is a real problem, I would say.
This is a problem that allows us to move into a space where you
know what? What do you, what do you do when
you start pitting a federal government that is supposed to
be somewhat adversarial, in this case, that is supposed to be
able to preserve the Constitution and it is not
agreeing to its specific responsibilities under there.
So this is, this isn't the ongoing fight that we're dealing
with and it continues on. I want to play this, this video
that we put up. This is something we talked
about just like sort of the unhinged left and sort of the
way that things work. This is video #1, if you would,
coming from It's coming from CNN.
This is a former Republican elected official in Georgia.
And what you're seeing is that unified.
You know, I always ask, are are the rhinos the real Republicans?
Are they the ones that are actually emphasizing it?
There was so much insanity about Donald Trump getting into office
that it's almost impossible to remember all of it.
So we're going to refresh your memory a little bit here.
And they're showing that even though the Republican Party
should be united around the guy who is the forerunner in the
primary, there's this concerted effort to move it.
And whenever you bring a Republican on CNN, we know that
something is not on the up and up.
If you want to roll video clip number one for me, right?
This feels different. You know what?
Donald Trump did his did his most damage in Georgia.
He sucked the soul out of the Republican Party here.
He sucked the morality out of the Republican Party, the fiscal
responsibility out of the Republican Party.
He's he sucked our winning percentage out of the Republican
Party. He's taken everything from us
and it is our turn to take it back, right?
It's our turn to win elections based on the policies that we
think we're better on. This is the prime spot for us to
take Joe Biden to the woodshed and call him out for not running
the border, right. Not protecting our communities,
not putting our best foot forward internationally.
These are our moments in time. But if we make this about the
three ring circus of Donald Trump, we will lose, lose and
lose again. You make a good point that you
make a good point when CNN agrees with you that we need to
get rid of Donald Trump, that Donald Trump is the very, very
bad man. He's the problem that we have to
deal with. You know, you might be on the
wrong side. Donald Trump has been indicted 4
* 2 state and two federal. And rather than see the party
rally around and say this is a Banana Republic, this is not
okay. They're able to find plenty of
people who look nice in a suit and speak articulately that
could be marched out in front of a CNN audience and say, look,
we're we're not the crazy people here.
It's Donald Trump with the three ring circus that he's running.
It's the man that we've been basically fighting tooth and
nail against since 2015 that we've been shrieking that the
sky would fall, that we are going to be dealing with an
unprecedented, unacceptable removing, you know, political
environment in the United States, that it's racist and
it's sexist and it's homophobic and it's bigoted.
And he's now been accused credibly of sexual assault, even
though the lady who who is speaking about the sexual
assault there is nuts, right. This got this lady, Jean
Carroll, whatever her name is, that was in New York.
And then and now they're going to, you know, the fact that
there was a civil finding against Trump is enough for them
to act, trot out their, their stories.
Meanwhile, how about the credible allegations against Joe
Biden that we hadn't decided to just bury and quash More about
that at the end of this week as we move forward, may have some
very interesting information, stories that you are not totally
familiar with. It's certainly not from the
first hand source, but we're going to be bringing you some
some questions about, well, why is it that they want to paint
this brush so broadly? Why do they have to keep that
focus specifically on there? I've got a video that we're
going to play for a second, right?
Had to step away for just a moment.
We got a video that we're going to play that's going to remind
you of just how unhinged and how scared.
And moreover the things that are going on in Michigan right now,
the electors that are being prosecuted for the false slate
of electors, which is essentially a a faithless
electors case, right. These are people that they
thought were going to basically vote against what the state said
that that hadn't been settled by the time that Michigan sent
these things or that people decided to show up and run
against them. The the case, the Supreme Court
case was actually settled in 2020 and it was the result of a
case brought Chiaflo versus Washington, the socalled
faithless elector case that we brought this up in the
constitutional discussion of whether or not Trump would be
able to make this argument that that in fact it hadn't even been
settled yet. They were trying to figure out
whether or not the electors, going from the what do they call
the the Electoral College, could vote against the recommendations
of their party. They they wanted to to know, can
we send electors and can those electors actually make up their
own mind? That wasn't settled law under
the Supreme Court, which does get to have that judicial review
process that didn't actually get settled until until 2020.
So I want you to step back to 2016 and remember just how
unhinged these people have been. If we'll play video clip #2.
I saw this training again. I think Matt Couch.
I'm going to give a little hat tip here.
Matt Couch from Red Voice Media was was scrolling this across
his Twitter feed. And when I watched it I went, Oh
my God, I forget somehow how crazy things have been for the
last eight years, how unhinged. We've seen this.
So let's watch this little quick video clip and just remember,
first of all, it's clown like because we can see how silly
these people are. But more importantly, look at
what they were asking to happen. Is this not the insurrection
that they were all running against clip number two
Republican members of the Electoral College?
This message is for you. As you know, our Founding
Fathers built the Electoral College to safeguard the
American people from the dangers of a demagogue and to ensure
that the presidency only goes to someone who is, to an eminent
degree endowed with the requisite qualifications, an
eminent degree, someone who is highly qualified for the job.
The Electoral College was created specifically to prevent
an unfit candidate from becoming president.
There are 538 members of the Electoral College.
You and just 36 other conscientious Republican
electors can make a difference by voting your conscience on
December 19th and thereby shaping the future of our
nation. I'm not asking you to vote for
Hillary Clinton. I'm not asking you to vote for
Hillary Clinton. As you know, the Constitution
gives electors the right to vote for any eligible person, any
eligible person, no matter which party they belong to.
But it should certainly be someone you consider especially
competent, especially competent, to serve as President of the
United States of America. By voting your conscience, you
and other brave Republican electors can give the House of
Representatives the option to select a qualified candidate for
the presidency. I stand with you.
I stand with you.
I stand with you in support and solidarity with conservatives,
independents and liberals and all citizens of the United
States. They stand with you just letting
you know. Also, the Constitution does not
say that they can vote for any qualified person.
Do you notice that they quoted The Federalist Papers, by the
way, and acted like that was somehow law?
The Federalist Papers were arguments on behalf of the
Constitution and the Federalist system.
They suddenly like federalism, Leftist suddenly like federalism
whenever it backs their purposes and deny elections whenever it
suits their purposes. I don't know how half those
people were, but Deborah Messing, the woman from Will and
Grace? That's just so sorry eyed right
there about the idea of it. Look how sorrowful and and
somber and serious these people are about how bad Donald Trump
was going to be. That was 2016.
That was a group called Unite for America.
I went and looked for their page and they actually have a funny
little thing. There's just like a bunch of
nonsense. Nobody responds to it.
I don't know if it's dark money or where it comes from or who's
finding it, but it it does tell you that the the narrative being
pushed is is totally ridiculous. We're going to pull up our last
topic here, kind of go out on kind of a silly note because
everything else seems so screwed up and and stressful.
How about this one right here from the Guardian?
My wife sent me this and she started laughing.
I guess Gavin McGinnis was highlighting it, talking about
the the beta male cabal. This is from a guy named James
Ball. It's unrelated anything else
we've been talking about here, but it does tell you how scared
they are of people thinking on their own and coming up with
ideas that are contrary to the mainstream media.
It says everything you've been told is a lie inside the
Wellness to fascism pipeline. A guy named James Ball.
I pulled up this guy's this profile fixture last night, my
wife and her sitting in bed and looking at it and I go, I don't
know if that's a dude. I don't know if that's a female.
I don't know what that is. Is that a, a transgender person?
Is that a male represent you know, female representing as a
male. It's all really silly it.
And and so come to the conclusion, since there's no
significant amount of work talking about his brave and and
courageous transition, that I assume that this is actually a
regular dude with a little pink banner behind him who is
incredibly effeminate features and a soft doughy body.
Who is really scared that people who are interested in meditation
and people who are into doing yoga and some other things are
going from namaste to NA? I don't think I trust the
government. This is, this is apparently the
real scary thing. This actually goes right in line
with some of these pieces that you've seen out there that say
there is a direct connection between working out and like
right wing extremism and you know being a gym rat can turn
you into a fascist and all the other stuff.
They literally say that there is a Wellness to fascism pipeline
and essentially what it came down to is a bunch of people who
are interested in meditation and yoga and Reiki and you take your
pick of like sort of traditionally left-leaning self
help and practices. These sort of spiritual but
nonreligious practices have found themselves doing something
that everybody else did too. Because this is a universal
thing. There's a universal distrust of
government institutions to include the media right now, And
I think what we talked about touches on a lot of that.
They are not sharing with you the full narrative.
They're not sharing with you the information that you might need
to make an intelligent decision. They're trying to spoon feed you
a government line of garbage. So this guy is super worried
that there's a radicalization of nice, middleclass, hippieish
groups turning into fascists because they are now looking
around going, man, is there child trafficking going on?
And apparently that's believing in an actual trial, trafficking,
which totally happens. The movement of children
illegally for work and for sex is now a right wing lunatic
position, even though it's documented by federal law
enforcement cases. I mean that's that's the world
we're going to live in. These people are going to just
go out there. You're the idea that you would
say, hey, maybe the election wasn't legit.
Maybe, maybe I don't want to get a COVID vaccine because I
believe in other wellnesses. What's funny is when I was
growing up, the people that didn't want to get vaccines of
any kind, they were not getting all the childhood vaccinations,
MMR. They weren't getting smallpox
and all that. They were all on the political
left. They were like crunchy Lib kind
of woo woo types, right? They were all leftists.
They were Uber Lib hippie types and now that's considered to be
a right wing fascist, dangerous white supremacy thing.
How funny when the common cause happens for people who just
basically look at the government and go, I don't think we trust
you. That should be just about
anybody who's worked in the federal government.
It should be just about anybody who served in the military that
looks and sees the inefficiencies and the
ineffectiveness. That doesn't mean that you don't
love the country and it doesn't mean that your oath is gone.
It means that the implements and the mechanisms for executing
these types of things are not inherently trustworthy because
you've seen how the sausage is made and it's not made well.
It's made of a bunch of corrupt and ultimately individually
greedy people, the Charles Mcgonagall types who are out
there looking, how can I use this position to enrich myself?
How can I tell people how great I am and use that?
And and at the end of the day, we've had a couple of people
from the the retired agent community.
And when I say we, I mean the suspendables, the Gerda Boyles,
the Marcus Allens, the, you know, producer Phils, the Steve
Friends, we all look around and go Where is the massive outcry
of these people. And ultimately what we've seen
is that people who are collecting a government pension
are scared to speak out for fear of losing that government
pension. Phil said something on True
Social the other day. He said that the employees of
the federal government are bribed every two weeks with an
unlimited supply of Federal Reserve notes.
You guys may have seen that and he's exactly correct.
There is a tremendous fear that even though even though you
think there are things that are going on wrong and you have
probably credible evidence and experience and anecdotal time of
all the different little minor corruptions that have gone on
and it leads to a bigger narrative, those people are not
speaking out. Why?
Because they're afraid they're going to lose that pension that
comes from OPM. They're afraid that they will
find themselves PNG from the government circle and they will
no longer be able to go out there and get lucrative jobs.
They will no longer go out there and sell the influence they had
to their prior employer and say how great they are.
Little do they know that this Wellness to fascist pipeline is
actually a pretty big movement of people on the left and on the
right. And it's a lot of people that
are looking and saying if you want credibility, come out, blow
the whistle, come out and say give credible allegations of of
wrongdoing, talk about what is screwed up.
But the fear is, is that you'll be destitute.
And the government, as my buddy Gerda Boyle said so clearly is
more than happy to crush you for doing such things.
Let's shut that down here. We got a big interview coming up
this afternoon, which I am very excited to share with you
tomorrow. I'm not going to say anymore
about it other than you're not going to want to miss tomorrow's
show. I talked to Miranda Devine about
it on text messages last night, and she was like, oh man, I'm in
for that. There is going to be, we're
going to shake some things up, I think.
And I'm definitely going to have an FBI investigation opening to
me on the counterintelligence front if I don't have one
already, simply for engaging in this interview.
So let it happen, but it be we don't shy away from things like
that. We are not scared of the FBI
here. We've seen how the sausage is
made, and it is made by people who are less competent than many
of you think. Doesn't mean they can't shoot
you dead in your house. Doesn't mean that doesn't wake
me up in the middle of the night sometimes and have me sitting on
my couch looking out the window. But it's not a thing that we can
live in fear of because the government should not lead us to
a position of fear. We can't accept it.
It's totally unacceptable. And as many of you know, our
hashtag, Are you suspendable? Hashtag are you suspendable?
Is how we say that you ask your your neighbors and your friends
people who are following you anywhere on social media.
Let them know it's time. You have to be suspendable.
All right folks. You've been listening to the
Kyle Sarafin Show despite technical difficulties streamed
live from Liberty Hill TX. And we do want to thank you for
listening. Thank you for sticking around.
Look like they were what 600 plus of you that made it over to
the second stream despite a false start and some will say
very curious feed issues that we were able to shut down the feed
and restart it and and change keys and it managed to work.
So maybe that was just what happens on Rumble when you try
to schedule out your your thing in advance, or maybe when you
schedule a feed that is called counterintelligence with
pictures of former FBI agents. The FBI doesn't look kindly on
it. We'll find out.
Or maybe we never will. That's the way it goes.
The show will continue. It continues to grow.
We have reached 655 star reviews on Apple as we requested.
Thanks so much for coming through folks.
Let's get it up to 700. Our goal is 1000 by the end of
the year. This was a producer Phil's dream
for the show. We are well on track to making
that happen. Leave us a 5 star review on
Apple. You can scroll right down and
you click on it. If you have an iPhone, you can
click through it. If you were on a Macintosh, you
can click through it. You can see one just like this
one. This is coming from.
Who's this coming from? This is coming from PAP 121319.
I don't know what those numbers mean.
It says Kyle is on fire. I saw you first on Dan Bongino.
You're on fire today and I appreciate your call to action.
This must have been from Wednesday of last week.
So one week old now. FBI SWAT teams killed someone in
Albuquerque yesterday, another in Utah today.
The FBI is so corrupt is beyond hope.
Thank you for all you do for us. I hope you Steve friend and all
the other suspendables keep up the good work.
We'll keep doing it. You keep doing it.
Pat thanks for that review. And of course as we found out
today, no details yet but another person killed in Memphis
by FBI SWAT. So ongoing killing it's just the
this is that's far too frequent in a seven day period.
That's actually the most I've ever heard of since I started
paying attention to the FBI which was probably in 20/14/2015
as I was making my applications in.
Very scary stuff. We'll say thank you to to your
Five Star review. Send us another one.
Anybody out there that wants to send it and have it read, we
will read them on the show and we want to say thanks to Ryan
Matta who made it in today and struggled through our tactical
difficulties. Follow him on Twitter at Ryan
Mata Media. MATTA Ryan has some really
interesting stuff from down on the border.
I know he's been going through terabytes of data that he's
going to be sharing with you, so you guys will be seeing that.
And you can also catch him on his LFATV show, which is called
Mata Of Fact. You'll find that at 2:00 Eastern
Time on Rumble as well. Go ahead and look for Ryan Mata
Media on Twitter or follow him here on LFATV.
You can find him on that that Rumble channel.
Folks like this channel. As you're leaving, please scroll
on down, make sure that the thumb is green and it says that
you enjoyed what you saw out today.
Share the link if you want to see this channel continue to
grow and we do really appreciate all of your subscriptions.
We are adding some custom emojis for all the subscribers that are
actually available in the live chat, as you guys discovered
today, when you go to play with those things.
So by all means, subscribe to the channel and we will see you
again tomorrow, probably with some pretty groundbreaking
stuff. I'm very much excited about it.
Do not miss tomorrow's show. We will try to troubleshoot it
ahead of time and we'll see you then.
Thanks for listening to The Kyle Seraphin Show streamed live
weekdays on rubble.com/kyle Seraphin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth, Social and Instagram at Kyle
Seraphin.