Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends and
welcome to the Kylo Serafin Show.
Today is Wednesday, it is September the 10th, and I
appreciate you joining us for the program.
I want to talk about trust and the lack thereof in this
country. We have moved from maybe a, a
high trust society in many ways to a low trust society.
And I think that in many ways now we are in a post trust
society. I'm not confident that we can
earn it back. I had a post the other day that
I, I firmly believe and I put this out on social media and of
course you get some pushback on it, but I think a lot of people
understand what I'm saying. I don't like the idea that we
have to pretend that we were going to vote our way out of
this situation in this nation. And I also don't like the idea
that people think we did. And so for those of us that kind
of sit in the middle, I had a a very interesting discussion with
a former guest of ours named Amy Nelson, who I think is a
wonderful person. And we probably came from very
different places politically to get together and say that we are
both post partisan. I'm not bipartisan.
I'm not a partisan. I'm post partisan.
I don't believe that the parties do anything.
I don't think that they are, they are representing anybody's
perspective. And from the people that I talk
to, human beings are very nuanced.
And it's really, really rare that I find someone that says
that, that actually understands what's going on.
IA 100% sign on for all the planks or tenants that this
political party represents. I got to sit in on a, a Twitter
space yesterday. There was like 30 people in it.
It was disastrously low attendance and it was the Texas
GOP and A and a committee woman hosting a discussion with a
prospective state representative in the state of Texas.
And he met went on to talk about the ongoing issue.
Even in a red state like Texas, where the primary system is one
of the weapons that the party uses to eliminate any dissent or
any new ideas or anyone that's going to challenge the status
quo. Now, we've heard that before.
We heard that in Florida as well.
And so I'm not, it's not foreign to me.
But what I didn't realize with the messaging that came down,
and it is partisan messaging and it's stated essentially that we
need solidarity. We need to come together and
support the incumbent candidate against challengers from the
outside during the primary. When in reality, if we were a
group of people that were looking for truth and the best
answers for all things, what we would say is we want to accept
anybody who has a idea. And we want to debate that idea
on the merits during the primary system.
And since we don't see that and the establishment gets behind,
you know, whatever their normal candidate is, because that's a
known quantity, that is the status quo.
They throw all the money and the influence and the party
mechanisms behind it. You don't ever get anyone to
challenge it. And that means that I'm, I'm
beyond the ability to trust that system.
I'm post partisan. I can't look at a system and
say, oh, it actually actively avoids good answers or new
answers or challenging answers. And therefore what I'm going to,
I'm going to get behind him and say, yeah, rah, rah.
This is why I'm never going to see, you know, a political party
represent my perspective. And I don't think many of us do
either, if we're being totally honest.
If you were to evaluate the candidates in front of you, do
they represent you? The only ones that might are the
ones that are the closest to you, which by the way, was the
way our system was designed. I think it's broken
dramatically. And we didn't vote our way out
of this in November of 2024. And that's really something
that's hard for people to accept.
And it makes you look like you're some sort of down, mopey
black pillar, someone who's selling doom and gloom.
It's not doom and gloom. Actually.
I think it's actually liberating to say that national politics in
this country actually probably can't be saved, not in the way
that you thought. You can't just go out and vote
in a general election and then find some turn around.
And for all the executive orders that are being signed under the
Trump administration and they just capped over 200 of them,
that was something we talked about yesterday, 200 executive
orders. They can be flipped like a light
switch on the first day of the next party's occupation of that
of that job. So there's no solution there.
That's a ping pong ball that gets knocked around.
What that means is, is that I want to start looking more into
local politics on my personal end.
And I hope you guys are doing the same thing.
And this is obviously the same thing that we talked about in
November, that you weren't going to solve it.
You should know who your local candidates are.
We can observe more and more reasons why we must devolve to
the lowest levels, state and local government.
We can still talk about the problems nationally and then
they should be addressed locally.
So I think that's what we're going to try to do today a
little bit. And I'm going to, I'm going to
present an argument for you right up front.
This is an argument made by a guy named Andrew Branca.
I was on a, some kind of a podcast with him with, with Ron
Coleman on an election night. And so I was introduced to him
at that point in time. He has a, a pretty good sized
YouTube channel as well. So you guys may be familiar with
him as well talking about trust. And so he's going to talk about
I think cultural and economic trust.
I'm going to address the following claims during this
podcast. We're going to talk about
institutional trust to include things like public health,
primarily public health in this case for institutions, which
also covers down on education and science and some other
things. We're going to talk about Media
Trust, which I think we all agree is at an all time low.
All the the studies say as much and why that would be.
We're going to discuss things like governmental trust, another
institution and governmental specifically about what should
be a political stats. Just gathering numbers and
telling people this is something, these are the number
of dollars that were spent. These are the number of jobs
that were created. This is the amount of inflation
that we've observed. Things like that can't even be
without a political lean. And so they've destroyed the
trust in that. And all that gets to a broader
concept of if you don't know who the problem is, if you were
unable to articulate who are the movers that are manipulating
behind the scenes to make you not have any trust then and you
don't trust anybody. And in a post trust society,
what do we do with it? Donald Trump actually had the
answer to it. So I'll probably lead with that
as well. But before we get into any of
this sort of heavier topics for Wednesday, it's the middle of
the week. We can handle a little bit of a
burden, right? Let's start off with our friends
over at Patriot Coolers. Again, they are wonderful folks
that make a great product if you are so inclined.
And we use them yet again yesterday.
My wife does this thing called the Azure Drops and you guys
know it's like a, the grocery store goes to a, to a, a parking
lot. Then you go pick up all your
groceries there. So you get 25 LB bags of flour
and grain and stuff like that. And they always have frozen
goods that my wife gets and we end up putting them in our
Patriot cooler. It's the easiest way to do it
because it comes right off a semi in the frozen section.
It's already thawing out in the hot Texas sun.
We immediately throw it back in to our 50 quart Patriot cooler,
which sits in the back of the minivan at all times.
You guys can get your own at patriotcoolers.com.
Promo code Kyle saves you 10%. Maybe you want to get one
engraved like this one. I've been using this all the
time 'cause it's still pretty freaking hot here in Texas.
This is 40 ounces of of ice and water and I just usually load
that up 'cause I don't trust my kids to take their own water
bottles. Tote it with me.
When we go to the to the playgrounds, when we go out and
do anything outdoors, we go for a bike ride.
I just bring my own 40 oz keep it in the back of the car.
When we get there and their water bottles are empty, it's
like boom, there we go. Now we'll recharge you guys.
Keep it cool. Keep people from avoiding a heat
stroke. I guess you could put 40 ounces
of coffee in there if you were a complete savage.
That's the kind of thing I used to do when I was working in in
the surveillance world. Anyway, check them out.
Patriot coolers.com promo code Kyle.
There's a link in the show description if you guys want to
see the engraved options. And we're going to get into
today's program starting now. All right, little, little pull
from the water bottle there. And so let's let's talk about it
again. I gave you the the answer at the
end of yesterday's show and I'm going to do it at the beginning
of today's show. And I think the answer actually
is the same answer that we got in the book of judges.
If you look at times of human trial, the answer to low trust
or post trust societies is always trusting, not in human
beings. It's saying institutions of men
inevitably will let you down and it doesn't matter whether you
have a government that you think is inspired, it often times will
be LED astray, even if you have a, a good and, and worldly king.
And we do sort of do this thing where we now believe that our
president is sort of a regal figure that will come in and
bestow rain upon the parched wastelands.
And we'll go out there and stop crime and, and, and, and subvert
human nature, which is full of mental illness and, and anger
and, and, and frustration. Like that's not how it works.
But we can act like it for a little while only until we're
exposed to the true reality that that doesn't solve it and it
never does. And so for all those people that
are out there and doing it in sort of a trolling manner, they
post these on social media, Christ is king.
I wonder how many of them have actually considered that?
Because a lot of them put MAGA out in their, in their, their
profile too. And if you ask them a couple of
questions, they would tell you that Donald Trump is the
solution, even though they have the evidence right in front of
them in their own statement that says otherwise.
You're not going to find an earthly king that wins.
That's essentially the message that the New Testament brings to
us and that the only way that you were going to king get a
king that was going to solve the problems had to be both man and
God. Hence Christ is king.
I think that's the argument. I think Donald Trump is almost
there and he said it the other day and I really like the
message in so much as it is something that is not without
hope. If you guys remember the movie
The Matrix, which I I found to be kind of formative in my
youth. It's a story all about, it's all
about salvation. It's all about the the coming of
Christ and, and, and bringing someone who is going to take
humanity from darkness and light.
But if you recall, there was this moment where this
character, Morpheus, this sort of prophet character goes out
there and he holds out the 2 pills, right?
The blue pill and the red pill. And so, so many people have have
talked about it in a post matrix civilization in the last 25
years. It's been sort of a common
expression to be red pilled is to quote UN quote, see things as
they are. Isn't it interesting that seeing
thing as they are is unbelievably depressing, right?
There's the Matrix version of it, which is that that glossed
over. If you're living asleep and
you're plugged in and they're taking the body heat out of you
or whatever the heck the story was right?
It was draining human beings for their bioenergy.
They were a little human battery system and they were walking
around in this imperfect universe that was a creation of
of their mind and an architect and all those other kind of
stuff. And then you take the red pill
and you wake up into reality and reality is Bruce brutal and and
harsh and nasty and and lethal and and scary and dangerous and,
and full of, you know, lightning strikes and so on.
So waking up doesn't feel good. And amusingly enough, I think a
lot of people use the term red pilled like they suddenly
understand how things are going on.
Oh, everything's it's not good, though.
That's the real answer. To be red pill, to be awake, to
be alert to the situation is to go, yeah, this is not this is
not a winner. We're not living in a great
reality. But that means that you don't
necessarily have to win if you actually believe in that thing
that I see a lot of people sort of, like you said, put in a
troll manner and they say Christ is king.
Have they really thought it through that it actually is sort
of like acknowledging that suffering is is probably the
name of the game and that loss on Earth was the win?
Anyway, here's Donald Trump again.
This is this is the right focus. I'm not even sure if Donald
Trump realizes that, you know, maybe taking this out of context
is not fair to to his perspective watching it.
But I'd like to believe it is. And I think a lot of people can
look at this and go, OK, got it. Even if the messenger is quite
imperfect, and even if the messenger didn't even understand
how important the message is, this is still it.
So let's bring religion back. Let's bring God back into our
lives. Thank you all very much.
Thank you very much. Great honor.
Thank you. All right, so let me make the
argument opening up and this is again, I led to it earlier on.
It's Andrew Branca or Branca, He has this program.
This is a little short talking about trust, and this is going
to go into the broader context of discussing trust and the lack
thereof. And then I've got like maybe
let's see 5 or 6, maybe 7 news stories here that I think
illustrate that all coming from major publications.
So there's ACNN story, there's an NBC story, there's an MSNBC
story, ABC, New York Times has a good one, and then also CBS.
So all of the the major media outlets are actually talking
about trust or lack thereof, whether they actually intended
that or not. Again, sometimes we see these
themes running through news threads, and I pulled the ones
that I thought were the most salient.
There's also a bunch of other things that are being discussed
right now that I think are distractionary at the top of all
these pages. So let me start with this little
short. Let's evaluate the concept of
what he talks about high trust or low trust and then I'm going
to make the argument for post trust.
Folks, it's like you've we've all driven around the
countryside at one point or another, right?
And you and you go past the little farm and they'll have a
table or they'll have a shed and there's a bunch of corn and
tomatoes and cucumbers and melons in the shed for sale.
And there's nobody manning the shed.
They have a little sign up that gives the price for the items
and they have a box you can put the money in.
And there's not much to keep anyone from stealing the money
out-of-the-box, much less taking the produce and not paying for
it. In a high Truss society that
works. In a low Truss society, they rob
you blind. They think they'd be an idiot
not to just steal all all this stuff.
That's the difference between a high trust and a low trust
society. In a high trust society, your
kid can ride his bike to the convenience store and lean it
against the wall and go inside and buy a candy bar and have
some expectation the bicycle will still be there unlocked
when he comes back out. In a low trust society, the
thieves figure out how to break every bike lock, so even having
a lot becomes pointless. And whether you your society is
high trust or low trust, I was going to say it's a matter of
choice. I don't really think low trust
societies can become high trust, but I think high trust societies
can be degraded into low trust societies.
And that's what happens to America when you import 10s of
millions of low trust cultural third world migrants into a high
trust society. They rob you blind.
All right, I'm watching the chat as this is playing right now and
our live chat is discussing that many of you live in areas where
this is a reality, where there are in fact these farm stands
and I've seen them in places that are blue ish, right?
Like what we would call blue areas or or Democrat voting
areas. They existed in Hawaii when I
was there. If you go into small areas,
often times what it comes down to is population density.
And it also comes down to sort of cultural homogeneity.
And if that's something that is accepted.
There's places in Connecticut that I've seen this.
My mother in They'll just leave out several dozen eggs from the
morning, you know, from the morning harvest of it.
And they'll go into their, their, their chicken coops and
they'll pull them all out and they'll set them out on the farm
stand. And throughout the day, people
will come in and put money into a jar and take fresh eggs from
this little farm that's on the side of the road.
So that's the thing. It could be, it can happen in
blue areas, it can happen in red areas.
It's not unique to politics, but what it does seem to be unique
to is that it only happens in small little regional areas.
It doesn't happen on a national scale.
So for all of you that are experiencing these little Oasis,
I think they are more common than than Americans would think,
but not for the the vast majority of our population.
All right, the first story I want to talk about is from CNNI
thought this was quite interesting.
And this is the degrading of what should be a political,
Simply put, numbers that our government calculates in order
for it to do its job. And what we found is because we
live now in a low trust or even a post trust society, we can't
even get numbers to be without some sort of an agenda.
The headline goes, Massive job revisions are a stain on Joe
Biden's legacy, too. Oh, they put the word too in
there because they also mean that it's also a stain on Donald
Trump's legacy or on Donald Trump's current work.
Quite interesting. The past two months of job
reports and a slew of recent employment data have made it
clear that America's labor markets have been substantially
weakened. Remember, this was also on the
heels of yesterday's story talking about how black women
are a bellwether for employment in the United States.
I don't think that's true. I don't know why someone would
make that argument. I don't understand why somebody
would get out there and be a congresswoman like Ayanna
Presley and try to make that point to people, but to
highlight things about race because that's what she does.
Many of the many of President Donald Trump's critics have
leveraged data. So This is why it's it's it's
partisan because you have critics using the data to claim
that it's all his fault by imposing unprecedented tariffs
and and strict immigration enforcement operations that have
slowed down an otherwise healthy economy.
And although Trump's policies may have contributed to some of
these dismal employment datas in years, some of the most dismal
employment data in years under his watch, he may not be as
blame deserving as his critics have stated.
He's still to blame. Of course, this is CNN, of
course, so we can't just ignore. But what we are going to also
say is that, as it turns out, the labor market inherited from
former President Joe Biden was not as solid as the economist
thought before Tuesday, when the Bureau of Labor Statistics
released its preliminary annual benchmark revisions between
April of 2024 and March of 2025. And during that year, over that
time frame, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said 911 fewer jobs
were added compared to prior estimates.
So they rush a number to press, and it seems to have a partisan
meaning. We're doing a great job.
We've added a million new jobs to the economy.
Look how awesome we are. Look how great we've done.
And then quietly they go back and they do the revision.
This is the same thing as putting a slanderous and
salacious headline up front and then doing the retraction and
the correction. You know, on page 8, headline on
the front page, Joe Biden adds tons of jobs retraction.
Page 8A. Year later, Joe Biden economy
not quite as good as we originally intended.
And then you end up having people try to parrot that
mouthpiece information. They want to go out there and
say, yeah, like, Joe Biden did a great job and look how terrible
Trump is because of these things, when in reality, we
should be looking at this group called the Bureau of Labor
Statistics. Of course, Donald Trump sort of
fame famously fired people that were involved in some of these
statistical claims and and rightly so.
But did that solve the problem that you actually have a
partisan goal with numbers that should just be math, simple
math, not racist, white supremacist math.
Some people on the left might want to make it.
It's just an estimate that shouldn't have any.
And then shouldn't you always err on the low end?
Unless you're getting political pressure to make someone look
good and someone not, here is our Treasury Secretary having a
discussion on Meet the Press, which is obviously quite
left-leaning on NBC, and he's pushing back about the claims
that are being made. All of this is a degrading of
trust. Even the fact that you have to
have this argument says that we can't even trust simple numbers
that our government should do, which shouldn't have anything to
do with with anybody. They're just either factually
true or they're not. And if they're not, then why
aren't they, Mr. Secretary? You know, the economy did add
nearly half a million manufacturing jobs under former
President Biden, in this case since April.
Again, you're actually losing manufacturing jobs.
Is that problematic for your policy?
A couple of things, Chris, we're we're going to get the revisions
for last year next week and there may be as big as an
800,000 job downward revision. Again, this would be the second
downward revision. So I'm not sure what these
people who collect the data have been doing.
It's good. We we need good data.
Secondly, what we are seeing is the jobs that are being created
are going to either native born or legal Americans the most.
The jobs created under the Biden administration, they went to
illegal aliens. Well, and I, I think that there
would be a lot of debate over the fact that they went to
illegal aliens, but let's keep no, no, no, no, no, that, that,
that that's, that's the fact. OK.
And is there evidence to say that?
Yeah, there's certainly some anecdotal data points that pop
up. We talked about a, a Hyundai
factory the other day in the Carolinas, right.
And they had 450 people that were being arrested and and
carried off. What I sometimes gain from from
the comments is looking at the problem in ways that I hadn't
previously done. One of our, our commenters and
you know who you are, stated that that was likely only one
shift. And if there are 1200 plus
people working at that factory, and that was the claim that the
news article actually made 1200 plus people, then you would
imagine that roughly 400 ish people would be on each shift.
And there are three shifts if you are running a 24/7
operation. So they came in for an 8:00 AM
or a 9:00 AM, you know, knocking and, and raid it to go pull
people off that were here illegally.
And that may only have been one shift to the point where you
could have the majority of those 1200 people working illegally.
And by the way, they were not Hispanic workers, which is often
the case when you think about ICE raids.
These were mostly it seemed like Korean workers.
So Donald Trump went on to say things about, hey, you can send
your, your high intelligence and your high capabilities.
You can bring your high skilled workers in and you can sponsor
visas here. And we're more than happy to
have, you know, a, a movement in of high capabilities and people
that are going to be part of our society and that want to add
something of value, particularly if they have an intellectual
capability. But what you can't do is you
can't bring in illegals that are going to work for cheaper and
they're going to work in substandard conditions that
Americans wouldn't wouldn't accept and that we wouldn't
otherwise allow. Kind of interesting to consider
that as many as all of those workers could have been illegal
for all we know. They just grabbed one shift of
it. And so the Treasury Secretary,
they're talking about how many of these jobs were in fact
people who had no right to work in this country at all.
That means that the countries that the companies that are
hiring them are in violation of U.S. law.
And obviously also the people are.
And odds are they're finding a work around there, which means
they're either stealing somebody's identity, which we've
talked about the E-Verify system not functional and so on.
So you got to gas like the people you have to, and that's
how you end up with this story. Now, I'm not a huge Mike Johnson
fan, as you guys know, from the minute he was named, I didn't
think it was great. I was a big fan of no one for
speaker because if you don't have anybody in the speaker's
chair, then they don't pass any of these bloated appropriations
bills. And we don't have to even be
lied to in the 1st place that we're going to get single issue
appropriation funding. That never happened.
That was the entire reason why Mike Johnson was supposed to be
there. And he's supposed to be this
like, you know, liberty oriented Christian man from Louisiana.
And he, and he's got kind of a Smithersy little way of, of
talking about it. And, and everything he says
sounds quite good. And, and he's, he's so
reasonable right up to the point where he says, like FISA is a
necessary evil, that we have to have it and that we're, we're
pro FISA now. Remember, he walked into a skiff
comes out and suddenly he doesn't want to be the guy that
goes up against FISA. 7O2 We know that we're going to already
get another continuing resolution because that's what
Congress does. We're looking at the end of the,
the, the fiscal year coming up and they'll just do what they
always do. They kick the can for a little
bit until you forget about it. And then Smithers is going to
introduce whatever the the big funding package is.
Another omnibus. We were told no more of that.
Obviously that didn't happen. That doesn't mean that they
can't gaslight about what this guy is talking about.
So this is an NBC story, we've got CNN and and this is MSNBC.
Mike Johnson is trying to sell Americans on the benefits of
being occupied. The speaker believes that
Chicagoans should bend the knee to the president who's promising
aggression in the city. He says if you don't believe
that, then you're not fully American.
I don't think that's exactly what he said, actually.
Speaker Mike Johnson on Tuesday told Democratic mayors who run
cities that Donald Trump is threatening with troops to stop
resisting. Yield man, said Johnson.
Republican Louisiana, let the troops come to your city and and
show how crime can be reduced. It's a moral boost, a morale
boost for the country, and it's as safe and it's a right for
everybody to be involved. OK.
They make an analogy here from 22 years ago when Dick Cheney
said that U.S. troops invading Iraq would be greeted as
liberators. I think those of you who went
there had various different experiences of that particular
that that particular welcoming. We've heard Republicans make
preposterous claims that a people, in this case American
people, would welcome AUS military occupation.
Well, here's the facts. People do when things are bad
enough. But why wouldn't they?
We're talking about going into Democrat run areas where
Democrats who by and large believe that government is the
answer to the problems. And if things are bad enough,
turns out this whole course of Cloward Piven discussion that
we've had for the last couple years, if you overwhelm the
local system, then people look around and they go, yeah, I
think the answer might be a federal solution, whatever that
is. Oh, the National Guard.
Great. There's a big problem with that,
though, because what happens when you invite National Guard
troops that the entire American population is going to have to
fund out of our our vast coffers?
Then what happens when they get something under control?
Let's say they do a decent job of it, and they end up, you
know, sort of lowering crime locally.
Are you going to have the same police force that failed before
step back up and take it over? You can't be there forever.
We've proved that you can't permanently occupy Chicago with
a National Guard. At some point you're going to
have to realize that the problem is not simply an institution
issue. It's not a government issue.
It's not going to be a a political solution to it.
It's not that if you just had the right criminal justice
system that we could get it done right.
It's that you have a cultural problem where people are OK with
violence and taking things from others, but you can gaslight
during the meantime. And you can act like what's
going to happen is if you brought in a bunch of National
Guard troops or if you brought in a bunch of ICE agents to go
in and reduce the number of people here illegally, many of
whom are involved in crime, whether they're victims of crime
or whether they're perpetrating it.
Like, I don't want a captive victim population and I
certainly don't want a bunch of predators.
The the left wing argument that I use regularly for people when
they talk about illegal immigration some sort of
favorable way and they think it's just or righteous or it's
compassionate and it's humanitarian.
It's not. Having seen it directly outside
of Washington DC, which in theory should be one of the most
lawful places in the United States, which would make it one
of the most lawful places in the world, and it's not.
You can go within walking distance of Washington DC.
You could walk from the Capitol in under a day.
You could walk to a place where it is completely run by Ms. 13
guys, at least it was when I was working there.
You'd bring in, let's just give an example, 100 illegal aliens.
And we brought in millions of these people.
Of that hundred, you only need one of them to be predatory.
That's willing to kill and maim and destroy families and
individuals that has nothing to lose and they will extort under
under the threat of violence from every single one of the 99.
And they live like a king. They now have 99 people that
work for them that pay them 20 bucks a day or 20 bucks a week.
Small little businesses that are getting extorted for small
little amounts, but that adds up on a weekly basis times 52 * 99.
Start doing those numbers. You realize that that's a six
figure income from just being the bully and the gangster that
controls all those folks. Now they are in a place that
they have no access to law enforcement.
They have no recourse to culture.
They don't understand the language.
Then they've got the same problems they had where they
started, except they're worse off.
They don't even know the rules that exist in the United States.
And then every once in a while, that guy who's at the top of the
chain, he ends up killing somebody, throws their body in
the park. And we find it a couple years
later, and there's nothing we can do about it.
And everybody lives in fear. They left one crappy third world
nation. They came to the United States
seeking freedom and hope. This is the liberal dream.
This is what the leftist wanted. They get here and then they're
abused and they're taken advantage of.
There's nothing we can do about it.
So the solution might have to be pretty, pretty drastic and
aggressive. If you say that, though, then
you're invading and you're stopping people's First
Amendment liberties. You're you're you're somehow
doing something awful because you're parking on a public St.
outside of a church. This is an interaction between
the quote UN quote borders are this is Tom Holman talking to
Mika Brzezinski, who's making an argument illogically about
parking spaces being the thing that is a threat.
And I think he sets her straight.
So a lot of people thought this was a a nice little back and
forth here in so much as it's a little bit closer to the truth.
I see on the show this morning you have Governor Healy talking
about ICE doing enforcement operations at a church.
False. Didn't happen.
They were parked there. They did not do an operation
there, she said. They were parked in a public
space legally. But, but, but to say that and to
push that out there puts fear in the immigrant community.
So let me tell you, to do that puts fear in community to park
the ice. They're on a public St.
They're on a public St. waiting
to respond to a criminal alien release.
Pulled aside the road. Let me tell you, in the last
couple of days what's happened in Boston.
They've arrested Victor Gomez Paris, a 33 year old criminal
alien from Guatemala with charges of aggravated rape,
assault and battery with dangerous weapon, indecent
assault and battery on a victim 14 years or younger.
They arrested Kaylee Espinosa, a 33 year old criminal alien from
Colombia with charges of aggravated assault on a pregnant
victim. They were arrested Joshua
Gonzalez, a 23 year old criminal alien alien from Dominican
Republic with charges for trafficking heroin, morphine,
opium, resisting police, disorderly conduct and drug
distribution. They also arrested Samuel
Armando Barrera, a 20 year old criminal illegal alien from
Guatemala pending charges for assault and battery on a child.
So Mayor Wu and and and Governor Healy, they all be colonized and
thanking them for making their streets safer to to protect in
their communities and taking these people off the street.
They've turned a blind eye to this or sanctuary city
sanctuaries, cities and sanctuary states or sanctuaries
for criminals. Give ICE access to the jail to
arrest a bad guy in the jail rather than have them go in the
community to find them. Because when you go in the
community and find them puts ICE officers at greater risk.
It puts the community at greater risk.
It puts the alien at greater risk because anything happened
on street arrest. This is what we're trying to do.
We're trying to prioritize public safety threats.
When you got the members and mayors who are releasing these
public safety trusts every day into the community, that causes
the crime rate. And we've seen some terrible
incidents in the last few days where innocent victims are
murdered. This past year, I've seen
innocent Americans raped and murdered by people who are not
supposed to be here. That seems like a really
straightforward answer. And Tom Holman's one of those
guys that I think fits into the sort of higher trust category.
And the, and the reason is because what does he have to
gain? He's already got a retirement.
He's not out there looking for media attention per SE.
I don't think he necessarily enjoys it.
He's not the most eloquent of speakers, although his message
is quite strong. It's clearly passionate.
You know, he's like the kind of guys that you thought were
working for Border Patrol that actually wanted to do the
mission. It's not about Animus.
It's not about hatred of something else, although that is
how it is often spun. So we're going to cover some of
that and what the spin looks like in one second.
Yes. All of you who are watching Mika
Brzezinski's face, it is frustrating to watch.
It's it's obviously very smug, but they don't know what to say.
And if you look at her, her male Co host that was sitting in
there and standing in for Joe Scarborough, he's just like,
whoa, what do you even say when someone brings to you the facts
of the types of people that they were arresting?
And yes, the, the siren in the background is, is pretty perfect
when you're doing a stand up on the street and you're living in
a place where sirens are non-stop.
That is only a thing that you experience when you are in a, an
urban area in America. You don't see that in rural
areas. It's very uncommon when a, when
a, when a police or an ambulance siren goes by in rural
communities, everybody looks up because nobody expects it.
It's not common. But in urban areas, it's just
part of the background soundscape.
So for whatever that's worth. All right, Speaking of being in
urban areas, Speaking of people noticing what's going on, we can
talk about how the fact that all of you are carrying a tracking
device in your pocket. Yes, maybe you're using it to
call 911, or maybe you're just being tracked by government
agencies and big tech and corporate data brokers and cyber
criminals and the like because you have a constant and
pervasive digital footprint in the the FBI.
When we were doing surveillance, we refer to it as ubiquitous
technical surveillance because you were all putting out
significant numbers of signals every single day.
If you want to shut them down, which you can if you want to
have a little bit of Peace of Mind, if you want silence, you
can check out my friends at silentitsslnt.com/kyle.
Faraday products are blocking all the wireless signals that
come out of your phone, and you guys can test them yourself.
It's quite easy to do. You can connect things to
cellular, to Wi-Fi, to Bluetooth, to GPS, to RFID, to
near field communications. All of those things do not
penetrate their signal blocking technology sleeves and their
backpacks and their other bags. And that means you get to be
control of your own signal. If you guys want to do that,
it's slnt.com slash Kyle. Save yourself 15% on any of your
orders. You get free shipping on
qualified orders. They by no means are the
cheapest option because their options actually work.
There's an opportunity to buy something cheaper and you will
find that they almost all have leaks.
And I know that because I used to test them.
We would buy them with government funds and find out
that the Chinese stuff was not nearly as good as someone who
actually cares about their product.
And it does cost a little bit more to do it.
If you want no bread crumbs, if you want no remote access to
your information, if you want no tracking on your cell phones,
the same technology that special operations and intelligence
professionals use all over the world.
You guys can buy it. It's accessible to you.
It's in a very nice form factor, easy to use.
Check out the E3 everyday backpack, which is something I
have right there. It's my favorite travel bag
right now and it's very well laid out.
It's thoughtful. It has really cool smart
designs, like even the buckle in the chest is magnetic and snaps
into place when you have one hand operation.
Anyway, slnt.com slash Kyle, save yourself 15% on any of
their products and everything that I've so far and I've
probably got about 6 of their their products in this room
alone. They all work great.
There's a reason why they have military contracts for people
that have sort of no fail missions with millions of
dollars of technology at risk. We're going to continue pushing
onward with the argument that Meek is essentially making,
which is that you're kind of a racist.
Yeah. If you want to go out there and
enforce laws, if you want to go out there and try to establish a
higher trust, I don't think you can do high trust at a nation
that is now in a low trust moment.
But locally, you can come in and you can change that.
And that's the same sort of argument that I would make as
you see people in the chat saying, hey, in my area, we
actually have that. We have people that will do
roadside stands in our area. You can have an honor system
based transaction when it comes to buying produce or, or, or,
you know, goods. You don't have to have an
ironclad contract or someone with all the deodorant hiding
behind the, you know, a glass door just to take a $3 product
down because you're going to lose everything from what they
call shrinkage. Isn't it funny they call it
shrinkage? What they mean to say is lost
due to theft. Shrinkage is the is the industry
term for it. And if you notice that there is
a problem, maybe we could push back on you.
And so we'll have CNN be the push back.
This is arguments from Jasmine Crockett.
Yesterday I told you she was correct that the police do not
prevent crime. They can deter it, but they
cannot prevent it. Today she's making an older
argument. This is from a much older show.
This is in the 1st 100 days of Donald Trump's presidency.
And she goes to the obvious thing that they all do, which is
that it must be racism. It must be racism if you notice
that there are some problems in this country at a national
level. And if you really want to know
who the criminals are in this country, you can Google it.
You don't have to trust me. But the people that commit 80%
of the most violent crimes in this country are white
supremacist. Yet for whatever reason, they
sit and they serve at the pleasure of the president.
They are the ones that were there on January 6th tearing our
democracy down physically, and now we have them tearing us down
right here from within misses. I would like to see a study that
that considers the nail length this new sort of thing.
I've there's always been women who have had longer nails of
various lengths and I don't know what the lure is.
Men, I don't I don't think it's for us.
Maybe you guys can tell me in a comment below.
Men, are there any of you that are like, ah, a woman with extra
long nails is particularly attractive to me.
That's what I'm looking for in a mate, in a partner, someone.
I guess it shows that you're unable to do anything manual or
physical labor, that you can't even wipe your own butt.
I guess that's what it shows that you are so privileged that
you're unable to do anything with your hands.
You've incapacitated your own fingers from the reasons that
you have them and the reason that God created your hands the
way they had. Maybe that's the case.
Maybe that's just like it's a big flex for money, but I, I
feel like there's probably a really interesting psychological
correlation study between like detachment from reality that
other people live in and the length of the nails that you put
on and your ability to do any work.
We should get that study done. I would like to see it.
I would like to see the results. In any case, CNN is a very good
luck look. They like to present themselves
the most trusted day of the news.
They want to be in the middle, allegedly.
Like I don't think anyone honest believes that there was probably
a time when they were closer to the middle.
I remember that time. I remember watching the first
shots of the first Iraq war on CNN.
And it was a it was a groundbreaking thing they could
do. They brought, you know, infrared
cameras and night vision and they went out into war zones and
they showed the first stud missiles flying in the Patriot
missile intercepts and the tracers flying through the sky
and all the wild stuff that happened, you know, with Bush
one point O and they were the most trusted name in news
because they were constantly on it and they sent people
everywhere and you go amazing. And now they've got people like
a sitting congresswoman and this podcast host who are making the
same argument. In 2025, in my lifetime at 43
years old, I can pretty honestly say that I lived in a, a
significantly post racial America.
And I think all of you did too. There's a reason why a lot of us
think that maybe peak US culture, even though we lost a
lot of the, the, the institutions of the Republic 100
years ago or 120 years ago, a lot of those things may have
happened. But when it came to like peak
America culture where we thought we were the good guys, we had
the maximum amount of freedoms, we had all these different
opportunities. There was huge amounts of
hopefulness, especially on the, the end of the Cold War.
And everybody looked around. It was essentially a post racial
America. And that was like at the end of
the 90s. And it was about that time when
people started looking around and going like, wait a minute,
what if all these people in these established positions been
doing with all of our money, what have they been doing with
the power that they've had as we were focused on external enemies
or serving the nation or building up our own individual
wealth or raising good kids or whatever it was that people did
in the 60s and the 70s and the 80s where they were trying to
live, you know, their freest and best lives.
And in the 90s, it kind of peaked out.
And then suddenly people went like, holy crap, we're about to
have $10 trillion. In, in, in a federal debt.
How is that? By the way, we're coming up on
40 now and $10 trillion seems quaint.
And it was a really big deal at the end of the 1990s.
In any case, I don't know how you go from the time that I was
a teenager and when I was running through high school
where it didn't matter what your skin color was.
And I don't remember anyone talking about it because it was
we were beyond that. We had already gotten beyond
that for a long time. And the only thing I can really
point to is that Barack Obama became president under some sort
of auspices of fixing something. And what he did was he
reinstituted A racial grievance culture so that you have people
like this who make a living talking about crazy stuff.
Here's another white supremacy claim from CNN.
It's. Not about, it's not.
It's about, it's about making sure that there is white
supremacy in this country. And if we're honest, we will say
that it is about we will make sure that people who DEI is is
really all these cold words. You you used to use woke.
I asked you to define what woke meant.
You couldn't really define it. Oh, I did tell me what it means.
Again, woke ideology is taking extreme views of American
culture and trying to tear down America from the inside out and
go outside of our cultural norms and invade every corporation
university. What is and other other.
Institutions, what is DEI tell me?
That's incorrect because I what, what you just said there would
also be really problematic to my claim.
No, no, that's exactly what it is.
The woke thing is just an erosion of all the sort of
greatness that we actually had. And again, that that greatness
probably covered over, which is why I think it's interesting.
I talked about the Matrix at the beginning of the program.
We did have a lot of sort of living an illusion where people
thought things were probably better than they were, but the
the sense of it was that they were better.
And over the last 20 something years, we've seen a massive
demographic change in this country.
And along with it, as the argument goes, you bring in 10s
of millions of people that have very different culture because
of your guilt, because of all the sort of claims that the, you
know, white supremacy. How do you alleviate white
supremacy? We bring in people who are not
white. Well, is it even about skin
color? Because I don't think it is.
And, and having served in the military and many of you have,
having served in law enforcement on side by side by people who
have very different skin tones than me.
It's not about skin tone. It never has been.
It's about culture. It's about people that like
agree with me at a fundamental level that women and children
should be protected. That's a Western idea.
They think that they serve God and then man.
Second, that government is not the end goal that it's supposed
to be. In God we trust, not in God
Vermont, we trust. Those people sort of act a
little differently. They kind of act more like
whatever. I act like they think that they
have individual sovereignty and agency.
They think they're responsible for their own decisions.
They think that no one is coming to save them.
It's up to us, but also it's up to us to take care of our
neighbor and be our brother's keeper if we can be, if we have
the ability. Like it turns out, like a lot of
the people that I work with, if you share those values, it's
irrelevant what color skin you have or what sort of melanin
content you have in your skin. It's completely irrelevant.
It's about this cultural belief that there is a good and a bad
and moral relativism is not it. That's not acceptable.
That there are some things that you ought not to do, that you
ought to be punished for it, that if you are outside the
bounds of society, regardless of what you look like, you can't be
part of ours. So we're going to go out there
and police our own. That happens locally.
Or you could just make the argument that anybody who has a
bad lot in life, it's not their fault.
And so we've been told. We cannot acknowledge that there
are certain true thing. Think about this.
Yesterday I said to you that there's not a single black woman
that I've ever met that I would want to be my boss.
And my wife cringed. I don't blame her 'cause I
thought about it afterwards. And I went, oh, that sounds kind
of like a, that sounds like a thing that you would get really
yelled at for. But then I went back and
thought, I've had one black female boss and she was effing
awful. She was absolutely atrocious.
She was a staff Sergeant and she was a tech Sergeant actually in
the US Air Force. She was the one of the worst
bosses I've ever had, only to be beaten out by a blonde haired
white lady who was also my boss. Because my my add on to that is
I don't want any black women to be my bosses.
I don't want any women women to be my bosses period.
Because I've had terrible women bosses and I can't think of any
of them that were really, really good.
This doesn't mean that they aren't in existence, I just
haven't experienced them and I just don't really need to try
that out anymore. I'm good with it.
It's really simple and it makes people cringe.
They go Oh my God, can you say that?
You can't say that you don't want women to be your boss.
Why not? What if that's been the
experience that I have? What if everything that I've
learned in 25, let's see, I started working my first job.
I was probably 15 years old, 14 years old, something like that.
I've got, I've got almost 30 years of work experience.
That said, this was that's not, doesn't work for me.
That's just not the way that I operate.
The worst bosses I've had were women.
I had a woman who was my boss who was a couple years older
than me when I worked at A at a pool and I walked off the job
because of her, because she walked up to me and talked to me
like a toddler. She said, Kyle, how do we sit in
chairs? I'm like, what?
How do we sit in chairs? I'm like, I don't know.
We've never sat in a chair together and I don't really
intend to. No.
Kyle, how do we sit in chairs? It doesn't matter because my
competency at this job is beyond whatever your concern is about
me sitting in a chair. I had the the the pool record
for fastest safe backboard for a spinal injury at the bottom of a
pool. One man, you know, like coming
off the chair from the lifeguard stand, pull somebody out of the
bottom on a breath hold, draw them up, flip them over, bring
them into a place where they could get rescue breasts, take
them and put them onto a backboard with a partner that
was on the deck. We did it in like under 90
seconds, no problem from the time of the of the emergency
happening to the be able to pull them out.
And she's worried about whether or not I have my knees off the,
you know, sitting in one of the loops of metal because it's an
uncomfortable chair with no padding.
I still remember this. I was, I was 17 or 18 years old
at that time. It's like, Nope, that sucked.
If you, if you recognize that problem, though, if you
recognize that there are just some things that you'll just
learn and you go, OK, well, these people are not my people.
Whatever they look like, irrelevant.
Their culture is not the same. Their values are not the same.
Then you're a real problem. Tucker Carl's can can say it.
He's worth 10s of millions of dollars and so who else can say
it? Can you say it at your job?
Are you free to just have an idea that is based on the
experiences of 20305060 years of working?
Can you have a thought? How many of you have heard women
admonish you? And it's almost always women.
I'm sure there's men that do it too.
That's not politically correct. I hear my own mother say this
because they got indoctrinated with this idea.
There are things that we cannot say, even though we all pretty
much think they're true about If you import a bunch of people
that don't have your cultural values, you degrade your culture
in this country. I don't like the way that he
uses the word white in this particular segment, only because
I think that it is a little bit too narrow.
But I know what he means by it and I don't disagree with what
he's trying to say. Here's Tucker Carlson going on
Piers Morgan talking about the issue in Europe.
We have the same problem here right now.
Well, the whole point is to humiliate and degrade the
indigenous population of the British Isles, the white
population. I mean, that's the whole point.
And are they really going to do something about it?
What would it? What would that be exactly?
You'd really have to force a lot of people to go back to their
countries of origin, millions of people.
And you need to do it really soon.
And are they actually willing to do?
That I I really, I don't know, but these are existential
questions that we have been browbeat into ignoring for
decades. But the question is like, is
Ireland Ireland? If it's majority non Irish, Oh
shut up, they're Irish. No, they're actually not Irish.
Same with the UK, same with England, Scotland, Wales.
Like it's all changing so fast. Nothing like this has ever
happened in all of history, except when, say, the Mongol
swept across the steppe and raped everybody.
Like that was true demographic change on this scale, but even
that wasn't as profound as what we're seeing in every white
country around the world. I would say the West, but
Australia and New Zealand also. So like, what is that now?
My brain is not big enough to understand what that is, I
think. I mean, I have a lot of theories
about it, but I don't know if they're true.
All I know is what the numbers are.
And that's real. And no one feels that he can say
it. Everyone's like, oh, well, if
that were happening in China or India or Malaysia or Senegal, it
doesn't matter. You'd be like, what the hell is
that? Like the population's totally
different. Look at graduation pick, I don't
know, King's College, law School.
And look at the graduation picture for the last 30 years.
Who's in it? Just like, let your eyes tell
you the truth for once, like this is a total change in
population. Is it better?
Is it worse? Can't have that conversation.
Who's who's pushing this? Does the population want it?
Population clearly doesn't want it.
There's no polling that's meaningful on the subject.
I mean, there's no referendum on it.
You don't get to decide. You've got no voice in it other
than you get to go to jail if you complain loudly enough about
it. What is this?
It's, I think it's the biggest and darkest thing that has
happened in the last 1000 years for sure.
And I think it's leading somewhere really, really bad.
It's not happening by accident. That's obvious because it's only
happening in white countries. I mean, I think that oh, shut
up, white supremacist. In fact, I'm not a white
supremacist. I'm just noticing what the
Hell's going on, I think. I love that Piers Morgan's like,
oh boy, what am I getting myself into?
And he loves being controversial.
Well, I think. And he says shut up, white
supremacist, because that's the push back.
That's the push back. That's that's completely
acceptable. Let's take a quick pause real
quick and we'll do a Spotify break here.
So Spotify ad, if you guys may hear one of those again, I say
Spotify, but it just means if you're on the audio, you may
catch a, an audio ad right there.
So, yeah, what what runs that and why can't you talk about it?
This is a bigger problem than just population, demographics,
movement, what what somebody said the other day, the great
replacement theory is not a theory anymore.
It's just the replacement. It's happening in Britain.
There's incredible statistical information that comes out.
And in theory, as Tucker just said, the numbers are actually
not emotional. They're just numbers unless
you're trying to slant them a certain way.
Now, do you think, are they like the Bureau of Labor Statistics
numbers where they are fudging them to make one thing look
better? They're trying to.
No, I think they're trying to actually downplay these things.
Remember, we can't get an accurate count of how many
people illegally came into our country.
Even over the last four years, forget the last 30.
We've seen a complete transformation from people even
on what's called the Democrat side, the left side of the
aisle, who theoretically, not long ago Bill Clinton era, would
have told you that people coming here illegally needed to be
deported. In fact, Barack Obama said it
quite clearly. We have laws.
We are a nation. There are rules.
This is not Vietnam, right? Like the the Lebowski argument,
you can't just do whatever you want.
The border has to mean something, so we deport you.
That seems straightforward. So it gets really, really
muddled and all that stuff. Whether, you know, again, the
reasons behind it, I don't know how to speculate on it.
My wife and I were having these conversations and it was like,
well, who's running this? People want to jump to
conclusions. I watched Jesse Kelly say
something the other day. It's the communists.
The communists have this theory. Communists are like teenagers in
an intellectual debate. They're intellectual teenagers.
When you have a discussion with someone who legitimately
believes that communism is a good idea, they're about as
solid as someone who has almost no life experience and
everything is paper thick. You can punch holes through it
like you can through wet Kleenex.
Every single argument holds up to 0 scrutiny whatsoever, so it
sounds really good. Kind of like when you were 16
years old. You know, when I had my first
and second job and I thought, yeah, I know exactly how the
world works. I've got all these great ideas,
but I have no experience to test them.
And once you test them, you realize, like, I actually don't
know anything. I'm, I'll complete moron.
Many of you, especially my men out there, know that this is
true. Not just when you're 1415 and 16
and you're mouthing off to your parents, but it continues on
until you're in your 20s. So for a lot of US, 2526, when
the when the when the frontal cortex starts developing to the
point where we actually can make better decisions, we go like,
oh, I was a complete moron for the entirety of the time that
I've been standing on this earth.
And all of my arguments were dumb.
That's why I thought punk rock was really cool and damned the
man and saved the empire. And that stuff was really
emotionally appealing, but it was dumb.
If you're honest with yourself, you know that.
And if not, you grow up to be a communist or an anarchist and
you think that's an answer. Here's a kind of a sober looking
voice. This is Robert Malone.
Robert Malone looks like the kind of guy, he looks like the
most interesting man in the world.
If he was not Hispanic, right? The most interesting man in the
world that Dos Equis commercials, He looks like a guy
that would have gravitas. And he's saying something that I
think is really important here. We haven't talked about the
concept of fifth generation warfare in quite a while.
We were really big on it during the election season because it
was really obvious. 5th generation warfare is is
asymmetric. You know, Infowars, if you will,
he's talking about who's controlling this stuff where
it's not really obvious. And so we have all these
villains. I've seen all these people call
about, like the deep state gangsters, and all these other
people are going to get arrested.
Wow. We need Fauci in jail.
Like, ah, we need Brennan. We need comedy, we need Biden.
Like all these people need to be locked at why?
Who's really pulling the strings.
He's asking relevant questions. I think this is actually worth
listening to. So I'm going to run this a
little bit longer than I might normally consider the question.
Are you even looking at the right bad guy or are you getting
manipulated as part of the entirety of it?
If everything is a psyop, isn't the things that you've come to
the conclusion of, isn't that the psyop too?
We did a whole thing about the Kansas City Shelf.
You guys should go back and look at that episode at some point.
I'm going to go review it because I bet you there's some
really relevant clips that play out real today.
Anyway, here's Robert Malone talking about it.
In true 5th generation warfare, you do not know who your
opponent is. Example.
Who is responsible for who's the puppet master behind the COVID
crisis? Have we as we've experienced it?
Who is it? Anybody here know?
Was it Klaus? No.
There's something above Klaus. Was it Biden?
Was it Tony Fauci? These are all surrogates.
OK? You don't really know who is
managing the message that has been propagated on you.
That's fifth generation warfare. Over the last three years,
Western governments, non governmental organizations,
transnational organizations, Pharmaceutical industry,
corporations, media and financial corporations have
cooperated by a public private partnerships, which I assert is
a euphemism for fascism, to deploy the most massive globally
harmonized psychological and propaganda operation in the
history of the world. OK, over the last three years
you have been subjected to the most massive harmonized,
globally coordinated propaganda campaign in the history of the
Western world. Full stop.
With this campaign, the governments of many Western
nation states have turned OK. This is key military grade
psychological operations, strategies, tactics,
technologies, and capabilities developed for modern military
combat against their own citizens.
These are inconvenient facts. Right.
The first thing he said as he was doing this looks like almost
like a Ted talk. The first thing he said was, is
that in true 5th generation warfare, you don't even know who
the enemy is, and if you think you do, you've probably been
hoodwinked. Who is it?
Who did it go to? Is it Israel?
Is it the Jews? I hear that all the time.
That seems awfully simplistic. Is it a bunch of, you know,
individual billionaires that are out there?
Is it Bill Gates? Is it George Soros?
That seems simplistic. It's the same sort of arguments
that people make against the so-called deep state, the
administrative state that we argue about here.
The administrative state doesn't have a ruler.
It doesn't get orders. There's not a text message or a
group chat where everybody in the deep state goes out and does
one thing. It doesn't happen that way.
It's a bunch of people who have been ideologically shaped and
refined to do certain things because of their life
experiences, because they've been rewarded for these types of
behaviors and they all independently come to the same
conclusion. That's how we ended up with this
funny little story that Steve Baker covered.
If you guys haven't checked out The Blaze, check out my My Ex
feed and and, and check the story out.
The FBI is still infiltrating Catholic groups in Louisiana and
they are policing speech to the point where they are taking
members of a conservative Catholic, a traditionalist
Catholic group. They are pulling them out
individually and interviewing them and saying, look, you
haven't said anything that was over the line yet in this chat
group that we weren't invited to because we're part of the
federal freaking government. But you're close.
The things you're saying are on the line as though there was a
line as though there was a line that you cannot say certain
things to your friends. There's no group chat that I
think that tells all the FBI agents, hey, a holes today we're
going to go after these guys. It's just a bunch of independent
Co aligned interests that work in the same types of
organizations. It doesn't have to be the FBI.
It could be every single government agency.
I said something to a friend the other day and I said you work
for a garbage organization. And he was like, well, the FBI
didn't used to be like this. It used to be better.
But obviously, yeah, you know, it's you think just the FBI is
garbage. And then I said no, no, you you
misunderstood what I meant by the word organization.
I mean, the entire United States government is a garbage
organization because it is full of people that do garbage stuff.
Our Chad is using the word siloed.
Yeah, they're siloed. They all have the right ideas.
They all know what to do. It's like independent terror
cells. They don't need to have, they
don't need to have universal command and control mechanisms.
No, you just, you know what the principles are, and then you go
out and execute it. The mission as you see fit.
Brings me to the story because Robert Malone brought it up.
Obviously, Robert Malone was a big voice during the the COVID
nonsense that has gone on for the last couple years.
I didn't realize that it was still ongoing here.
You now will learn it too. For some of you who have moved
on from this, some of us moved on from it right after we got
COVID and now we had to deal with the social implications of
it. We had to deal with the
financial and the economic and, and the employment based
consequences of COVID. But my COVID experience was done
when I survived it the first time.
And I used survived in some air quotes here because I got sick
for a couple days like a bunch of other times that I had the
flu and it sucked and then I was fine.
The CDC finds a 4% drop in the US death rate in 2024 from COVID
because they're still tracking it.
Experts say the decline may be due to COVID.
COVID fell out of the top ten causes of death for the first
time since 2020. The ongoing lie and the reason
why we don't have any trust in our government is not because
they just give us false Labor Statistics and they tell us that
more people got jobs than they did in order to make certain
people feel better about the work they did.
AKA Joe Biden, AKA make Donald Trump look worse.
A silly and partisan thing that is.
Not only are they doing that, the United States is talking
about a death rate that has decreased by 3.8 in 2024 as
COVID fell from the top ten leading causes of death for the
first time in four years. Did you know that COVID was when
the top ten leading causes of death in America last year?
I did not I didn't. I don't think it was ever the
top leading cause of death. That's my personal opinion.
I just say that anecdotally because I know people that have
died from heart attacks and I know people who have died from
strokes and I know people who have died from the flu, from
emphysema, from various different pulmonary conditions,
COPD type symptoms. I know people that have had died
from complications from diabetes and amputations.
I know people of all those. I know people who died in car
accidents. I know people who died in
gunshot wounds. I've held people who have died
from gunshot wounds. I've never seen anybody die from
COVID. Now, I didn't work in a hospital
during the COVID time, so obviously I have a a limited
data set. But you'd think anecdotally that
I would know a neighbor or a member of my family who died
specifically because it was COVID specific that ended their
life. And maybe I know someone who
knows someone, but I personally don't know anyone who did.
And that's kind of wild to me. I know people who we believe
died from the shots who's had a a nasty and horrific backlash
after receiving those those injections.
And maybe that was COVID. Maybe I just misunderstood it.
It's possible. But I'll tell you what, if it
was in the top ten leading causes of death, it stands to
reason that of the people that I know in the world of which I
meet and talk to and deal with, tons of them should know
somebody who's died from it. Again, I had friends who worked
in emergency rooms and they knew people who died from it.
So I'm 2° away at best. The report found that overall
deaths fell from 3.09 million in 2023 to 3.07 million in 2024.
Additionally, the report showed that the three leading cause of
death stayed the same for 2023 and 2024.
Oh wait, so there was consistency.
And those leading cause of death were heart disease as the
leading cause, followed by cancer and then unintentional
injury, also known as traumatic injury.
So the top causes stayed the same, but we had some big
change. Remember, for a while, COVID was
the top cause, and that's pretty freaking wild.
One of the top causes of death is not murder in this country.
We actually do have that benefit.
Homicide, death by another person's hand is not one of the
leading cause of death. But you wouldn't know that based
on what you've been seeing on the news because we are now
having this new discussion about race, of which CNN is letting us
know that race had nothing to do with it.
They're telling us that there's no way for us to be able to
solve the problem of human violence.
You've heard other people say now the left is actually saying
police don't prevent crime. I agree.
They don't. They actually deter it
sometimes, which I guess is a subset of prevention, But all we
can do is punish people and then lock them up.
So there's this discussion right now about something that is not
a leading cause of death. It's not the most leading cause
of misery, but it is a massive problem with trust.
Because in the case of heart disease, who's at fault?
Maybe you, maybe your genetics, maybe your environment, maybe
your financial situation. What about cancer?
Same story. Could be environmental, could be
the way that you lived your life, could be the things you
were exposed to intentionally or otherwise.
Unintentional injury. Often times it's your fault or
someone nearby, but it's not unintentional means it wasn't
like they didn't go after you. Car accidents, you fell off a
Cliff, you you fought with a lawn mower, you shot tannerite
when you were too close, took your head off I I don't know,
but murder is specifically something that is a trust issue.
It's another human being that is in your society that our society
has either not found to be unsafe yet or has let out
because they don't know how to deal with people that are unsafe
yet. And so they're wandering around
and then they break the ultimate trust.
They take someone else's life. They infringe on your liberty to
the point where you no longer ever have liberty again.
That's a massive trust break. And here's Van Jones saying that
we just don't know how to solve this problem.
We don't know why that man did what he did.
We don't know how to deal with people who were hurting in the
way this man was hurting. Hurt people, hurt people.
What happened was horrible. No one mentioned the word race,
white, black or anything except him.
I'm confused that we don't know how to solve a problem we came
up with solutions of. Of course they were terrible
solutions for all kinds of things that didn't involve other
people. And it turns out people are
actually really easy to contain. You don't need something
microscopically small to stop human beings from coming for
you. We can use chain link fences.
They won't stop mosquitoes. They won't stop viruses.
They won't stop ping pong balls if fired properly.
They won't stop poison darts by indigenous tribes.
But I'll tell you what. Chain link fence, It's not
permeable by human body. We figured out how to do that.
Somehow. We figured out how to stop a
virus that didn't stop a virus. This is a fun little thing.
This is why we don't have trust in a lot of ways.
You're not going to be able to make a recommendation to me
because we had guys like Anthony Fauci and this is a really wild
compilation, folks. So if you have never heard
things like this, the flip flop, we all remember it.
Have you ever heard it strung together on why we don't trust
the medical institutions again? What did I say?
We were going to have problems with our media, Van Jones
clearly lying about certain things.
We do know how to stop those people.
You put them in jail forever. You put them in an institution
forever. There are mechanisms to to make
human beings not be able to interact with other human beings
totally doable. We have financial problems.
We've got we've got calculations of statistic problems.
We've got public health as a crisis because nobody believes
the people that are talking about it, The people that are
theoretically in a position of high trust betrayed it.
Here's a great example of that. And This is why we are in a
trust crisis. This is why I think we are post
trust in America. It's not low trust.
As a nation we are post trust because they've destroyed our
ability to trust them. This is not rocket science.
We know exactly what we can do and what we should be doing.
Please wear a mask. No reason to be walking around
with a mask. I often myself wear 2 masks.
There's an e-mail from you including.
I do not recommend that you wear a mask.
Everybody should be wearing a mask when they're outside.
People should not be walking around with masks.
I wear a mask when I'm outside. You don't need a mask when
you're outside. Wear a mask at all times when
you're outside. So even if you are vaccinated,
you should wear a mask. If you are vaccinated, you do
not need to wear a mask. Doctor Fauci, thank you for your
clarity. You wear a mask, you can
decrease likelihood A transmitter or a inquiring
COVID-19 506070 maybe 80%. Said masks work at the margins,
maybe 10%. You're a master communicator.
Wear a mask all the time, consistently when you're
outside. It's not like I always wear one.
Always wear a mask. We do not recommend people
wearing masks. Children should still wear
masks. At least one mask.
You don't need to be walking around with a mask.
Absolutely. We should have universal wearing
a mask, mandating masks. Yes, let's do it.
If it doesn't happen nationally, then I think that the mayors and
the governors should do it. Mask mandates did nothing.
Forget the politics, look at the data.
Mask mandate states fared no better than states without mask
mandate. This is a 10 minute compilation
of insanity and I'm going to put it over at kyleserafin.com.
It'll be up on the the free post.
So if you guys want to just go over there and do it, if you
want to share the link to it because you can't find it other
places, I, you know, I found it over on social media useful
compilation of just how ridiculous the double talk was.
Now remember the answer to people on the political left,
This is the difference between left and right, by the way, it's
not, you know, in theory it actually exists like this.
I'm not confident that we actually have that in our
political parties. Hence I'm post partisan as well.
But if we were going to go over to the left, the answer should
be more government, government restrictions, government
control, cede some of your individual liberty and your your
control over your resources and a larger group, the US
government, federal government, state government, whatever will
come in and solve that problem. The alternative is on the right
hand side where you say maximum liberty, trust in God, trust in
your neighbor, act properly, hold your community accountable
through societal pressures, things like shame, right?
Things like, you know, encouraging virtue, rewarding
virtue and so on, individual and private charity, so on.
If you do those things, then you're going to be better off.
So the left always, sorry, here, this is my left, I'm on the
screen. The left is always going to lean
more aggressively towards a governmental solution.
You know, we're in a bad spot when they say that we can't
solve the problem of violence. These are the same people that
saw that we needed healthcare counselors.
We needed all kinds of compassionate releases and no
bond. And maybe if we didn't make
people broke, then this would work.
Here's Chris Cuomo telling you that there's there's there's no
way to solve the problem of mental illness.
Well, how come it's such a new, interesting issue?
And how come it was solved previously?
Yeah, imperfectly, but they had better, we had way better
control of this prior to Ronald Reagan shutting down the
institutions. There was a mechanism for it.
People just thought it was sort of distasteful and they got
conservatives to go along with it because conservatives say,
oh, well, you know what? More government is bad.
Generally speaking, yes, except in maybe in this case.
It's posturing that we can punish our way out of this.
We can't. The desperate and homeless, the
unmedicated and untreated. All those who refuse care or are
uncared for and sometimes violent.
It's on us for being all about feelings and not fixes.
In fact, here is what no one is saying.
You want to know the truth? We broke the system that kept
this from happening and we broke it on purpose.
Do the homework, I'll do it for you.
I did it for you. Since the 1960s we have been
doing less and less to deal with those who can't control
themselves. Shifting responsibility to
states. Closing large mental
institutions that were underperforming instead of
improving them. Cutting funding, not forcing or
enforcing insurers to cover what is needed.
And you know who did the most to create the least care for the
mentally ill? The same party now demanding
action. President Reagan made moves to
shut facilities and force patients out by cutting federal
spending in legendary ways, reducing mental health to a
memory hundreds of millions of dollars in the 80s so more
mentally ill people ended up on the streets and in communities
and committing crimes. Yeah, that's probably true.
That's that's a partial truth, which is how you get the best
answer. That's how you get to blame
somebody like Ronald Reagan. Now, look, Ronald Reagan was far
from perfect. And you go back and look at his
legacy once you get away from sort of the, the, the luster of
his his presidency, like he was terrible about guns.
For people who actually care about those sort of things.
I'm one of them. And, you know, this is not a
good legacy, but the answer that you shouldn't have federally
funded mental health care or federally funded, you know,
institutions, that makes perfect sense to me.
That is a conservative position. So he's not outside of the RIM.
The difference is it's supposed to be picked up by the local
communities. And the sad thing is, is that
you have this ridiculous idea that if the federal government
doesn't do it, then it can't be done.
That is something that the left makes an argument about
regularly. I don't trust their argument.
It doesn't need to be federal, It should be local.
It should be community, it should be churches.
The thing that made me realize that we don't have an answer and
we can't punish our way out of it.
There's this question that the CNN panelists were talking
about. I wonder if I have that clip
too. Good.
I don't because I actually didn't want to hear it.
Again, the argument was is like, well, how do we spot these
people? We used to be able to do that
because they were in your family.
And when you had somebody in your family, if you had the
village idiot or if you had, you know, the family's crazy person,
the black sheep who did things that were dangerous and
illogical, that was always out there, you know, causing
problems. We knew who they were because we
were around them. We didn't send them off into an
urban area to go live on the streets.
We didn't let them go move into some urban area on their own
when they couldn't take care of themselves and then just think
society will take care of them. Our government is charged with
this problem. They were our problem because
they're our family member. So breaking up families and
having less generational family support is actually the craziest
part of it. That's how you end up with that.
That's how it didn't exist. In the same ways, they've always
been people who are mentally ill, I'm sure of it.
They've always been people that were dangerously mentally ill.
But how do they get mitigated? Previously, the people closest
to them spotted it earlier. You think you don't know in your
house if somebody's crazy? If my wife starts telling me
that the toaster is giving her secret messages and that she's
going to have to drown the kids in the bathtub, we got a real
problem here. I'm not going to be leaving her
alone with my kids, right? If you have a a brother growing
up that's like that, and then your answer is as well, tough
shit man, you're on your own. Society will take care of you.
Because I don't have the bandwidth.
That's not the answer. And it doesn't have to be
government. It turns out it's just you.
Last night I was talking to people about that moment that
you had. If you're looking around on a
bus and something bad happened to somebody, If you're looking
around in the street and somebody's being, you know,
attacked or threatened and you're thinking, God, should I
do something? I'm going to give you a little a
little pro tip here because I've had that moment in my life.
I've had that moment when I worked in government.
I've had that moment when I was just standing in my life on the
street just as a guy. The fact the matter is, is if
you hear that little voice asking, hey, should I do
something right now? God's giving you the hint.
I've done an entire speech. I was out in in Idaho and I
talked about it, Isaiah 6-8. It's like, here I am.
I'm available for tasking. What does that voice sound like,
though? Is it like, Kyle, go out there
and do the thing. Please step up.
It's your turn. You're being called.
No, it's like, should I do this? Who said that?
It's time to act. Yeah.
You have a responsibility to people in your family.
You have a responsibility to your to strangers that are your
neighbors that you meet. Theoretically, we should all do
that anyway. Why do we not trust the voices
that we used to cede authority to?
We used to cede agency to authorities, people who had
money and power and influence and capabilities to do all kinds
of stuff. We're like, well, they they know
what the right thing is, right? They're doing the right thing
for us. What about this guy?
Why did we hear this message? And the message ended up being
loud and clear for a lot of us. You have turned away from me.
You've put your trust and your faith in the wrong things, and
so I will reveal them to you as being liars and frauds right in
your own eyes. Here's a compilation that is
truly. I'm sure we've seen things like
this before. This was a wake up call for many
of us because previously maybe we weren't paying attention and
we didn't get it yelled at as we come into what we're in
September right now, which means we must be entering into a
winter of serious illness and death, right?
Isn't that what we heard under the Biden administration?
For all of us that didn't get shots here, we are still alive.
How did that happen? Maybe because everything they
said was a lie and it was obvious to it and that was a
gift in its own way. It woke a lot of people up, but
it did move us away from trust. How can you trust anybody that
was in this compilation 20? One, we should be able to
manufacture a lot of vaccines and and that vaccine key goal is
to stop the transmission, to get the immunity levels up so that
you get almost no, almost no infection going on whatsoever.
Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting
themselves, but reducing their transmission to other people,
allowing society to get back to normal.
We can kind of almost see the end where we're vaccinating so
very fast. Our data from the CDC's today
suggests you know that that vaccinated people do not carry
the virus, don't get sick. Now we know that the vaccines
work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated
person. A vaccinated person gets exposed
to the virus. The virus does not infect them.
The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else,
cannot use a vaccinated person as a host.
If they'll get more people, that means the vaccines will get us.
To the end of. This.
Essentially, vaccines block you from getting and giving the
virus. Fully vaccinated people are at a
very, very low risk of getting COVID-19.
Therefore, if you've been fully vaccinated, no longer need to
wear a mask, when people are vaccinated, they can feel safe
that they are not going to get infected.
We have all the vaccines we need.
We just need our people to take it a for their own protection,
for the protection of their family, but also to break the
chain of transmission. You want to be a dead end to the
virus, so when the virus gets to you, you stop it.
You don't allow it to use you as the stepping stone to the next
person. I think given the country as a
whole, the fact that we have now about 50% of adults fully
vaccinated and about 62% of adults having received at least
one dose as a nation, I I feel fairly certain you're not going
to see the kind of surges we've seen in the past.
How bad is that? New York Times today, front page
vaccines and the CDC chaos exposed tension between Kennedy
and Trump. Is that what it exposed or these
hearings exposing that there is a entire industry of people that
are dead set online to you about information because if they were
just being reporters of of statistics, then people would be
able to make good decisions. I don't think it shows anything
of the sort. Here's the New York Times.
While there's no evidence of a break.
Listen to me. I swear to God, they just said
this. CDC and vaccine chaos exposed
tensions between Trump and Kennedy talking about RFK Junior
and Donald Trump. The next line in their sub
headline is while there's no evidence of a break between
them, HHS Secretary Robert F Kennedy has caused consternation
among President Donald Trump and his and his aides.
There's no evidence, but we are going to make a, a claim.
That's the fundamental basis of a post trust.
They're they're not even hiding it.
They're saying, listen, what we're saying is our opinion
based on no evidence because we feel that's true.
By the way, we have a bunch of other things we'd like to push
on you. HHS Secretary Robert F Kennedy
junior has faced A tricky moment on Tuesday when he released a
report outlining Donald Trump's Make America Healthy Again
strategy. Asked by a reporter if he agreed
with Mr. Trump's comment that vaccines work, pure and simple,
Mr. Kennedy, a famous vaccine skeptic, at first ducked the
question. And he said, I agree with that.
Finally, Trump's top domestic policy advisor, who presided
over the event Bank of gavel, bringing questions to a close.
It was an awkward scene, capped with a particularly fraught 2
weeks with the president and his celebrity health secretary.
There's no evidence that Mister Trump is going to break with Mr.
Kennedy. But the secretary has lately
caused consternation among his aides.
Got it. So it's just our feelings,
nothing to do with what actually happened.
It's nothing to do with reality. Let's see if we can drive a
wedge between this. This is Bernie Sanders.
He's.
Standing on a podium that says vaccines work and we are now
going to have a war on truth and on science and on other things
that we also think are very good.
And we are going to do it by doing lies for years and years
and then ignoring the lies. Let me be as clear as I can be,
We are now witnessing a full blown war on science, on public
health, and on truth itself. That is what we are confronting
right now at this unprecedented moment in American history.
It is important to share the facts as clearly as we can, so I
will take this opportunity to make a very simple point.
Can't be simpler. Vaccines work.
Period. And I will be surrounded by
people who are wearing white lab coats even though they are not
in a lab because that makes them look very medical like.
That's what we will do. NIH whistleblower details the
clash over childhood vaccines with the Trump administration.
We became inconvenient. Says this whistleblower, not
ironically using the term no air quotes around the word
whistleblower. By the way, this NIH
whistleblower, this is a story from CBS News, a former top
National Institutes of Health leader who says she was removed
from her positions after a dispute with the Trump
administration officials details internal clashes at the elite
medical research agency on Monday and warned of an agenda
that poses a quote substantial and specific danger to public
health and safety. By the way, those are words from
the statute to be listed as a whistleblower.
So she's actually quoting the statute and claiming
whistleblower status. At least she's doing it in a
clever way. Dr. Janine Marrazzo described in
an exclusive interview with CBS News that she was being silenced
when she and her colleagues tried to oppose efforts pushed
by HHS Secretary Robert F Kennedy Junior to cancel vaccine
research and clinical trials. Ultimately, we were disregarded,
she said. We became inconvenient.
She filed A whistleblower complaint with the US Office of
Special Counsel. Good luck with that, honey.
Last week, alleging a legal retaliation, she was placed on
leave and reassigned on a in April.
She's been in the role since August of 2023.
And she succeeded Anthony Fauci. She was the replacement for
Anthony Fauci, who served as the NIAID director for nearly four
decades. Well, as the chief medical
adviser to former President Joe Biden was not unexpected, she
said of her removal, But it was still a body blow.
Yeah, I agree, being a whistleblower sucks.
Going out and speaking out against your agency sucks.
What about when your agency is fully comfortable with lying?
This is not NIH. This is a discussion of the CDC.
This was a hearing. This is a man named Toby Rogers.
He's a PhD in something I'll have to look up right now.
And he's talking to Ron Johnson, who led this hearing about
vaccines and efficacy and sort of the damning information that
some of us had access to really early on.
How did we know? How did we know not to trust
people like this lady who's worried about becoming
inconvenient but apparently also doesn't want to give information
that's not partisan and just letting people make good
decisions? Doctor Rogers, you have
something. That's Scott, I think you wanted
to say something. Yeah.
I want to add to this debate. So I watched every single
meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization
Practices in the Vaccines and Related Biological Products
Advisory Committee in 2021-2022 and 2023, when all these COVID
shots were being authorized for use in this country.
And after a while, the CDC's own research showed that the
protection from the vaccine, if any, was between months two and
six. And by 6 months, it showed
negative efficacy. So I'm watching the hearings on
my, you know, computer screen at home.
I'm yelling at the screen. The COVID shots have negative
efficacy after six months. Tell me how a shot with negative
efficacy is saving lives. And it has the worst side effect
profile of any vaccine in human history.
So how exactly is a vaccine with the worst side effects and
negative efficacy saving lives? That's a preposterous claim.
What ended the COVID pandemic was the Omicron variant that was
more transmissible but less lethal.
The vaccine. How many people had helped?
I I think it's an open debate. It could be a net negative.
Well, maybe we can look at the clinical trial data in which 21
people died in the in the vaccinated group and 17 died in
the placebo group. I do want to, again, I believe
the first study that came out of showing negative FC came out of
Denmark. But Doctor Scott, you said you
want to say something so. Is everything better because we
did a hearing? Does it change anything?
Doesn't seem like it I've. Come to realize that those
hearings are performative. They're they're theater.
And, you know, they're not the kind of debate or open
conversation that that democracy would give us at its ideal.
And then it's all of us senators are taking hundreds of thousands
of dollars, including in, in some cases, millions of dollars
around the Pharmaceutical industry.
So they don't want to hear the answers to the questions that
they asked me. There you go.
It's scripted. Everybody's trying to get their
sound bite. You got the people on the left,
they're telling you that there's a whistleblower and we're
inconvenient and they don't care about facts.
And there's chaos, even though we can't prove any chaos and
nobody sees any chaos. There's no evidence of chaos.
But there is chaos because we believe there's chaos.
And the other side's like, hey, there's some data we think is
really important, but we don't have access to all of it.
And so we'd really like to be able to discuss it.
Can we have that conversation? Is that reasonable?
RFK Junior went out and had a little discussion about one of
the things that has changed that apparently is really, really
bad, which Americans in general should actually be excited
about. Less propaganda.
How many of you guys have seen to the point where we can make a
joke about it, pharmaceutical advertisements in your life?
That's relatively new, as far as I can tell.
And the reason is, is because there was a change in the
ruling. This is just a an edict that was
put out by the federal government, what the FDA had to
say and what this the FCC required them to do.
They didn't have to list all the side effects.
And if they did, it would be so long that people might be like,
oh crap, maybe I don't want to take this.
Isn't more truth the answer? It would be in a high trust
society, if we could actually believe that there's some reason
to believe what we're seeing on TV.
People still believe it, but not people who are in the post trust
part of it, not people who've been red pilled to the point
where they open their eyes and go, no, you're freaking liars.
We know you're liars, by the way.
How is it that something that is supposed to help my depression
also has a side effect of suicidality and homicidal
ideations? That doesn't seem like it's
really helping me. I mean, they're comical.
Apparently they're going to change some of these rules.
I don't think it's a fix, but I think it's a start.
It's at least acknowledging that this problem is that there's a
big, big trust gap. The.
President just signed an executive order.
Making some news here when it comes to pharmaceutical ads.
The president just signed an executive order.
That's an historic change in the way that pharmaceutical
advertising is done on television.
And the order basically reinstates or gives us now the
the opportunity to reinstate the 1997 rules.
Prior to 1997, pharmaceutical advertisers were required to put
all the side effects on their ads.
Many of them didn't advertise because it lengthened the
because of what it did to the length of the advertising and
that the removal of that requirement.
In 1997, FDA changed the rule to allow them to report the side
effects on a website or on a telephone and they know they
only had to report a few of them on television and that triggered
a proliferation of these ads. We there's only two countries in
the world that allowed to direct to consumer advertising by
pharmaceutical companies on television.
We're one of those countries. New Zealand is the other.
It's had a disastrous impact on human health, on people's
relationships with their doctors, and really on the the
entire gestalt where Americans are led to believe that there's
a pill for every ill and that you don't have to exercise, you
don't have to pay attention to your diet.
Whatever goes wrong with you, you can fix with a drug.
That seems like the the the end goal, which is that if you just
cede your authority, if you cede your agency, if you no longer
take any responsibility for the things, that something will take
care of it for you. There's a doctor out there who
knows the things. We've actually seen that
argument made by Stephen Colbert in the last couple days on TV.
You're a doctor. You're supposed to tell me what
to do. I'm supposed to lie about
whether or not I did it. That was his joke.
Hilarious. Seed your agency.
Let somebody else tell you how to handle your business.
Don't worry about taking responsibility and definitely
don't take responsibility for somebody else that would involve
like community. Meanwhile, you have the same
exact people saying that community should raise your
kids, that it takes a village and so on and so forth.
This is why I think the quote UN quote communist and even the
leftist ideology in general, it is teenage, it is paper thin
logic that doesn't even stand up to scrutiny against itself.
Like at the first level, the iterations don't play.
The only sort of coherent ideologies are that man's not in
charge. If you believe that God actually
runs things, then you don't actually have to despair.
You don't have to win here on Earth.
That's really hard to believe. It's really hard to to live as
though that were the case. But that's what Christians are
called to do. That's what Western civilization
is based on. And all of it is based on this
fundamental belief that the future is worth, you know,
protecting and that your time is to go forth and multiply.
And everything on the left goes against against that.
It says you should, you should be infertile.
You should try to worship the planet.
You should not have babies. You should not raise them.
Somebody else should good. You shouldn't have values that
actually prioritize good and evil and say that this is what
is right and this is what is wrong.
This moral relativistic nonsense, nihilistic.
And then meanwhile, our government's going to
investigate you if you have nihilistic ideas, and they're
going to investigate you if you happen to be too Catholic, if
you're too Christian, if you're too conservative or too
fundamentalist, if you're a radical traditionalist who
actually believes that, like, oh, well, like things actually
worked for a while. And we were getting better at it
as technology came on. And so all that had to do was
break this, this trust issue is not going away.
But the answer is actually more local than it is to be, to be
more national in focus. And the funniest thing about it
is I guess at the end of the day, it actually is the biggest
system is never going to be federal government.
It's always got above, which makes it even harder because the
federal government wants to quantify it.
You can't really not lie about the number of miracles that have
happened because how can they quantify it?
You can't number the way that people worship and experience
things in their own life. So it takes the trust category
directly away from the people that would like to be able to go
out there and and have an artificial means of holding it.
All right, that's the program today.
I actually have a little bit of a Bill Maher comedy routine at
the end. I think some common sense goes
in. Even people on the left, there's
plenty of people on the left that are not completely absurd.
Most of them tend to be a little bit older.
It turns out the younger ones don't get it.
Before we get to the palate cleanse.
If you're watching over on YouTube, make sure you subscribe
to the channel. I'd appreciate it if you did.
Make sure you guys have hit the like button wherever you're at.
If you're over on Rumble, if you're on YouTube, if you're
watching on X, hit the like, hit the whatever it looks like over
there. And if you want to join us for
the community end of this thing, it's at locals.
It's Kyle seraphin.com. If you want to share it with a
friend, you could do it on Spotify, which is the easiest
and I think probably the best platform now.
It's Kyle seraphinshow.com. If you've never used Spotify.
I'm actually a big fan of it. I've been kind of advocating for
them because they crush it. They give you all the options,
video, audio, skipping around, speed.
It cost you nothing, cost nothing to be part of our
program over there. You can just simply follow on
and more and more people tend to watch it.
So we get really good data out of it.
That's the upside for me. I get good data, which means we
can market the program. All right, we appreciate all of
you guys for watching. Let's do something fun.
How about Bill Maher talking about a Supreme Court decision
and discussions of something that shouldn't even be a
question? Imagine how low trust you have
to be, where we're going to negotiate whether or not you're
a man or a woman, and we think that we should be instructing
little baby children with insanity.
Trans in school. That Supreme Court is hearing
about the case in Maryland about someone who about it a couple of
religious people. It's really a religious base
case. They do not want trans books
that teach kids that some people are trans in the schools.
And here's Justice Amy Coney Barrett.
She's quoting from one of the books.
When we're born, people make a guess about our gender and label
us boy or a girl based on our body parts.
Sometimes they're right, sometimes they're wrong.
I think that's bullshit, OK? No, they're almost always right.
If you have a Dick, you're almost always a boy.
And this and you know, I think it's OK to teach kids, you know,
for there's a default setting for humans.
And if you're not part of that default setting doesn't make you
a worse person. These things happen.
I mean, it's on the right. They don't even believe the
trends is a thing. It is a thing, but it's not a
thing that happens like this where, well, we don't know, jump
ball, every baby certificate and even even Elena Kagan, one of
the most liberal judges said. I suspect there are a lot of non
religious parents who also weren't all that thrilled about
this. This is the kind of issue, you
know, it's one of those 8020 issues that the Democrats have
been on the wrong side of. It's not 8020, it's like 98 two.
And if you're part of the 2%, it used to be that your family
would help you and they would help make sure that you
understand that the toaster is not giving you special messages
and that your penis doesn't mean you're supposed to flip it
inside out and try to pretend to be a girl.
It's just like we used to do that.
Anyway, here's the answer. So let's bring religion back.
Let's bring God back into our lives.
Thank you all very much. Thank you very much, great aunt.
So simple. Hope you guys have a great rest
of your day. God bless you.
Thanks for listening and I look forward to seeing you all again
tomorrow. Who knows what the wild times
will bring? Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Seraphin show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth
Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.