Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth, because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
Agent Kyle Serif. Well hello my friends and
welcome to the Kyle Serif and show.
Today is Monday, it is May the 6th and we are rolling live
right now on rumble.com/kyle Serif.
And you guys can join us over there in the live chat which is
already going. And I want to say thanks to
Eric, Jason and Derose for Marshall and the Troops.
Appreciate you guys. And if you guys want to join us
over on rumble.com/kyle Serif and you can give us a thumbs up.
You can give us a like, you can give us a follow if you'd so be
if you're so inclined. And then you can also subscribe
to the channel over there. Once you hit follow, you got to
do it on a browser. That means you can do it on your
phone. You can do it on your PC.
You can also subscribe to the channel.
It's like 5 bucks a month, $0.22 a show.
Pretty good deal. Then you can complain about the
music all you want. That's the rules.
If you want to complain about the music that we run before
before the show starts, you got to be a subscriber.
Otherwise you get no vote. And I'm leaving Eric in charge
of deciding about that. Folks, we got an interesting
show today. We're going to be talking about
all kinds of interesting stuff. Want to get into a little bit
about the Palestinian protest? I think I want to do kind of a
retrospective. We're at a good point now, far
enough away that we can talk about where it's going, where
it's been. I went up and pulled articles
going back to October of 2023. We'll kind of see how the media
coverage has progressed 'cause I think that's worth looking at.
We're going to talk about birth control, which has been a topic
that is something we talked about in our family quite a bit.
For some reason, there's a woman named Alex Clark.
Met her in person and she's an interesting character.
She's been doing a lot of coverage of this.
There was also some coverage in today's loop from Catholic vote.
So I want to do some discussions about hormonal birth control and
sort of the way that is moved thinking and maybe the way that
it's actually moved our society and then like so many other
controls the the left loves, it kind of has some racist roots.
That's disturbing, isn't it? Anyhow, going to get into that,
going to talk a little bit about the commies.
Going to talk about the last thing I want to get into is this
DOJ issue which Daily Signal which is Heritage Foundation did
a nice coverage of. And this woman, Kristen Clark
who ended up being sort of the overall authority that has gone
after the protesters that are, that are protesting abortion in
this country. The Civil rights division of DOJ
has a woman sitting in front of it who apparently lied to
Congress. And I want to get into kind of
the deeper aspect of what it actually tells us, some inside
baseball maybe as far as the commentary that you're not going
to hear anywhere else. So make sure you guys are
sticking around here. We're going to get started by
First off thanking our sponsors and particularly I want to say
thanks to Patriot coolers Patriot coolers.com.
That's where you go to the website patriotcoolers.com and
the promo code Kyle Kyle. Promo code Kyle and you can get
yourself a customized Tumblr like the one up here.
This is Nicole's Tumblr. She posted it over on True
Social. Look how good that is.
It's got the badge, the Suspendables badge.
I wasn't sure about the sizing when I when I went on the the
website. That's the 32 ounce Tumblr.
By the look of it, I've got two of those.
I don't have it in that color. It looks awesome and if you guys
don't have your own you can customize them that we have a
couple of different logos. We've got the last line sub
stack AR with the plume coming out of it.
You've got the badge. You got the Betsy Ross option.
You got the upside down American flag with the suspendables S all
different things you can choose under the customize section.
All you got to do is go to any of the tumblers, the hard sided
drink cups, coffee cups as well and you click customize.
You Scroll down a little bit to Suspendables.
You'll be able to add something like this and you'll see how
cool they look. Promo code Kyle Kyle lets them
know that we sent you at at patriotcoolers.com.
Big thanks to them, They've been supporting us for well over a
year now. It's awesome to have a good
sponsor that wants to just stick with you and knows what you're
about. And we said, hey, why don't you
just take our logos and start putting them out there for
people? Because that's what we want to
do. All right, let's get started.
Let's get started. I don't have a ton of videos
today. I don't have a ton of you guys
know what protesters look like. They're kind of smelly.
They kind of have the same colors.
Right now they are all running in black and white and red and
green, that sort of pro Palestine colors.
But this is the thing that I keep saying.
Why is it that it's the BLM, ANTIFA Marxist agitators?
They're they're the same people. They're not even, they're not
even hiding anymore. They don't even need to.
In any case, I created a little meme today for you.
If you guys want to see it, I'll throw it out on social media in
a bit. But it does seem like all the
pro Palestinian agitators, the Hamas supporters if you will,
are the same exact idiots that were tearing this country up in
2020. They're the same ones that were
starting fights with cops. They're the same ones that were
charging barricades and trying to take over buildings.
Today they're taking over university campuses 'cause
that's where the fertile minds are the ones that are easily
susceptible to sort of commie ideas.
But but yeah, they're the same exact people.
It used to be that they're going after the federal buildings
because we had a lot of weakness in the federal system.
Today they're pro federal, except they're kind of anti Joe
Biden. They're kind of all over the
map, aren't they? They're a little bit confused,
but are the they are the same people.
And I've got a little video that comes out of the University of
Utah that shows us that Taylor Hanson and Tenant Media pushing
that out earlier. So let's get into a first story
here. I wanted to go back a
retrospective, if you will. This one is coming from KCURNPR,
Kansas City. If you ever spend any time
listening to Kansas City, or if you ever spending time listening
to NPR, it doesn't matter where you are actually Kansas City or
anywhere else. What you'll find is is that the
apparently a huge percentage of the world are transgender.
Everyone else is gay or bisexual.
And and all of the biggest, most important woke causes are
constantly being highlighted and they're always trying to share
with you the perspective from a fair and balanced position of
hard leftism. You got to love NPR.
The fact that we all have to pay for it.
This article dates back to October 15th and it is entitled
Palestinians in Kansas City Call for Peace.
They worry over loved ones in Gaza.
Quote, we are terrified now. I used to live in Kansas City.
It's one of the many places I live.
I lived outside of Kansas City, actually.
I don't remember running into a Palestinian American population
there, but apparently there are hundreds of them.
It's not that big of a place. There were roughly 1,000,000
people living in Kansas City and the and the surrounding areas
when I lived there. And what I found out is that
hundreds of years earlier, they were, you know, like at least at
the turn of the century, there were a million people living
there as well. It's kind of a constant
population area. The the statement here is that
local residents from the local Palestinian community, as I
said, I've never seen it, but it must exist, 'cause they said so
on NPR, just like they said. There's trannies in Kenya.
They gathered on Saturday, obviously last year in support
for Palestine and to demand an end of the Israeli occupation.
Now when I say hard left coming from NPRI, mean that these
people are going to do it in words and in phrases.
There are 12345 paragraphs that are written before they actually
say what caused all of this. And that's worth noting because
this was only a week after the invasion that took place on
October the 7th of last year. They're talking about this this
person. I don't know if it's a man or a
woman. Someone called Faras Elg
Hussein, a Palestinian American living in Kansas City.
They always can find one. Every phone call we get, every
text message. Every time our phone rings with
an alarm, we're terrified that it's going to be the call from
our families overseas telling us that our family no longer
exists. Can we just take one second and
listen to that every single time we get a text or a phone call?
Whatever the phone goes off, we're afraid it's going to be
our family. Telling us our family doesn't
exist doesn't make any sense. It must have sounded good when
they wrote it up. It's kind of like the the little
thing from Pirates of the Caribbean.
I remember Johnny Depp, where they talk about, you know, like
no one's ever lived to tell the tale and he's like, then where
do the stories come from, I wonder?
Same kind of idea. In any case, this person
supposedly was born in the Gaza Strip, has already lost family
members. That's sad.
Like there's there's obviously sadness in this.
Lost a second cousin. It's a woman, I guess, lost her
husband and therefore children. I don't know if that's the
second cousin's husband or her husband, blah blah blah.
Here's where it gets down to it 6 paragraphs deep.
It finally says the rally comes one week after Hamas militants
militants killed more than 1300 people in Israel.
Oh yeah, and 27 American citizens, prompting the Israeli
government to declare war against Hamas again.
And in those days, since then, 2200 Palestinian civilians have
been killed and thousands more displaced.
How many militants were killed? Doesn't have that number.
Why does it only tell us that there were civilian deaths?
And how did NPR validate that one week after the fact?
It didn't. It didn't validate those
numbers. That's what propaganda looks
like. Propaganda looks like verbiage
that is emotionally triggering and doesn't have to have any
factual basis behind it. Israel cut off food, water,
electricity, fuel and medicine from the region, and yet those
people are still alive today and we still see people that are
agitating on their behalf today in the United States.
So that's also not true. The other interesting thing is,
is that all of the Muslim countries, the Muslim majority,
the Arab nations around so-called Palestine or the Gaza
Strip area, they don't want these people coming in either
because they are a force of of of dissent within their own
nations. Nick Friedas, who's a member of
Congress, a former Green Beret, did a really good video.
It's about 6 months old right now.
You guys can go find this on YouTube.
There's one that's called, I think it's called the Y minutes.
But if you want to go and and just look for him, just type in
Palestine and Nick Friedas, you'll find great YouTube
videos. It's about 5 or 6 minutes long.
So I didn't want to play it today, mostly because I don't
want to crib off his notes. But he does this great, this
great retrospective talking about the people living in that
area and the sort of chaotic problems that they've caused
going back for, you know, north of 3000 years.
It goes all the way back into the biblical Old Testament times
that these people were were an issue.
There's a reason why there is a wall being erected right now
between the Gaza Strip and Egypt.
They've they've increased their border security while the
American continent or while the American country here has has
given up patrolling our southern border and allowing people to
come in by the millions. You've got people in Egypt going
like I don't think we want this force coming into our area.
So it's quite interesting that these folks are Chad this Like I
said for me the big coverage was two things #1 handmade signs.
You're seeing it on the screen right now.
These are people that have made them with markers and crayons
and sketched them out with pencils.
So they've got that. And the second piece of it is,
is that it took six paragraphs, only a week later, 6 paragraphs,
they actually, to talk about the underlying cause of what caused
this, you know, this Israeli invasion and this Israeli
declaration of war. It was like, yeah, 27 Americans
were killed and also north of 1300 Israelis killed.
It turns out that Israel doesn't have to necessarily be that
proportionate, particularly because these people have been
electing terrorists to run their country or their little strip of
the area, that region within the the country for, you know, north
of a decade, decade and a half. All right, so the second article
that I saw here that I thought was quite interesting comes from
LA Times. This is coming from November,
November 4th of 2023, and you'll see again still the handmade
signs. They didn't get the machine
rolling yet to start printing this stuff out.
Hundreds rally at the Israeli consulate in Los Angeles calling
for a ceasefire in Gaza. Isn't it interesting that these
people are rallying in favor of a ceasefire when they're the
people they're supporting are the ones that kicked it off.
Doesn't that seem weird? And then the photos here, which
are photos from about the same time, looks like they were taken
by the Los Angeles Times. These are people who look like
they actually might be related to people in Palestine.
The more that this quote UN quote protest movement goes on,
the less and less we see people from Arab nations being
involved. And the more we see, like
obnoxious socialist, Marxist, white chicks with liberal arts
degrees or comparative literature degrees.
This one says hundreds of people protested outside of the Israeli
consulate in West Los Angeles condemning Israel's invasion of
the Gaza Strip and retaliate. They got it right up front here.
They're like, OK, we got to acknowledge this in retaliation
for Hamas brutal attack last month on its neighbor.
Yeah. Is it really a neighbor?
Haven't we kind of decided that Israel sort of is just like,
completely encapsulates this place?
It's just a rogue faction within Israel waving Palestinian flags
and chanting ceasefire now is it?
Look, anybody who's ever been in a fight knows you can start the
fight, but once the other party gets involved, it's now two to
tango. Especially when there are some
grievances and you know, 27 dead Americans and, you know, north
of 1000 dead Israelis, they get a chance to do their own hit
back. You don't get to punch somebody
in the face and then say, hey, hey, I give up.
You can only do that in America in a law enforcement setting
where you can literally shoot at cops, drop your gun, put your
hands on your head, and they will take you into custody and
not kill you there. That doesn't happen anywhere
else in the world. And when it comes to this kind
of social movement, it's pretty wild that these folks decided
that they're going to bother people on Wilshire Blvd.
In the middle of the day and marching across the 405 freeway.
This is going back to November of last year.
Again, we saw all these protests.
Now, this is fun because this actually escalates the third
paragraph here. Although orderly and peaceful,
the marchers spread out all over the streets, leaving one lane
open for cars to patch. Eventually they took over the
entire Blvd. Is that really orderly and
peaceful? It might be peaceful that they
are not causing violence, but there's nothing orderly about
stopping traffic when you'd have no ability or no permit to make
that safe for anybody and nobody knows what's coming.
When you stop traffic, the assumption is is something bad
can happen. They stopped traffic in Israel,
by the way. On October 7th.
They shut down traffic and then they went door to, like
windshield to windshield and murdered people.
There's plenty of video of it. So it's very interesting that
the exact same technique is referred to as orderly and
peaceful. Again, propaganda writers are
going to write propaganda. That's the nature of how these
people work. And of course they say that this
protest comes amid the escalating conflict between
Israel and Hamas militants who once again, they have to
acknowledge, launched a surprise offensive from neighboring Gaza
on southern Israel, October 7th. At least the Los Angeles Times
is doing the lip service. I think their readership
audience probably has a fair number of of Israel supporting
pro Jewish and or just a Jewish reading base.
Even though they tend to lean towards the political left in
that area. They at least have to pay a
little bit of lip service to truth and honesty in this case
quite interesting. Now we're going to keep going,
we're going to move a little bit more forward and as we get there
we get to The Intercept. Now The Intercept is left a hard
left depending on what they're talking about and they're always
going to kind of side in interesting fact, which I don't
think they're wrong and sort of they have this long form
discussion on the issues with the ADL of which there are
plenty. But this article is coming from
February of this year. So we've gone forward like 2 1/2
months how the AD LS anti Palestinian advocacy has helped
shape the US terror laws. Now of course the backdrop and
the photos of it are all showing people that are protesting
against. This is at Hunter College, where
they're showing this, but they're protesting in favor of
whatever's going on in the the Palestinian movement, the pro
Palestine movement. But they're talking about
something that I think is really important.
They're talking about the free speech application or
implications that happen when we have people that don't agree
with us in this country. That's the brilliance of the
American experiment. You're allowed to say things
that we hate no matter how awful they are, right up until the
point when you are no longer saying and you are now doing
things that are dangerous. I would say that line starts
getting crossed as you come in and start blocking traffic in
Los Angeles. But hear this out.
Last October, as protests against Israel's war on Gaza
swept across US campuses, 2 prominent pro Israel groups
wrote to their nearly 200 universities and college
administrators urging them to investigate their students for
possibly violating federal laws by promoting pro Hamas anti
Israel messaging. We obviously had the house
passed something similar about this this sort of anti-Semitism
bill. The Anti Defamation League or
the ADL and the Louis Brandis Center for Human Rights Under
Law suggested that members check out Students for Justice in
Palestine, the largest Palestinian solidarity campus
organization in the country, which may have been violating a
law which prohibits people from providing what they call
material support, a broad category that includes money and
as well as services and other assistance to US designated
terror groups, ADL said. We can't sit by while these guys
are doing this, potentially materially supporting, Look,
when you're a non government organization like the ADL and
you have a specific political agenda, you're allowed to lobby
and to make noise about things that are potentially
problematic. But the idea of material
support, which we talked about a little bit here, I want to hit
it to you guys. Again, there's a nuance here
that is so important and very few people are ever going to
grasp it, mostly because most people have never been part of
counterterrorism investigations. Material support of terrorism is
the go to charge that you get people locked up on federal
terrorist charges. We rarely have overt terrorist
acts. It's almost always material
support of terrorism. You remember we talked about the
guy, the the kid, the 18 year old who wanted to have a flaming
sword and hit his dad with a lead pipe and take his guns and
shoot up a church in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho.
That was material support of ISIS.
That's what they got him on. That was the actual charge.
It's not bad idea theater. They literally have to see that
you provide material support, which is almost always money.
The problem comes in America where money is equated with free
speech because of Citizens United.
We have Supreme Court precedent that states that your money that
you give is your speech right up until you give it to an
organization that is dedicated to or or that is designated
rather as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, an FTO by the
United States State Department. So that only works for foreign
entities at this point. The State Department is outbound
focused. They are our mechanism of
diplomacy. The State Department declares
who is an FTO and the FT OS cannot receive money and
therefore your support of them in this country does not
constitute free speech, at least as is currently stated.
That's problematic. We have a fundamental
inconsistency in our legal standing right now where you
cannot give money except or you can give money and it is your
speech but you can't give it in instances where it's supporting
a group that the state the state of the United States with the
with the federal government has declared to be a a problematic
actor overseas. We don't really vote on that
stuff guys. We don't have much say in how
the state department operates. The state Department is an
executive agency but it's also part of that sort of
administrative state that deep state mechanism where people
have been there for many, many years.
And I'll tell you something that surprised me the most the first
time I went into the United States State Department.
We we talked the other day about the the the IC badge.
The intelligence community badge is the generic looking badge.
It doesn't have any markings on it.
It's got a steal of the United States, and it's bluish.
And you can roll into Langley, you can roll into NSA, you can
roll into NRO, you can go into all these different intelligence
community organizations. The State Department is actually
one of them that you can get in. I I only know that 'cause I did,
I used my IC badge and went in the one thing that blew my mind
there, and I would have never known this had I not gone in.
There is almost every single region and every single country
has what's called a desk. There's a China desk.
There's a Russia desk. There's a Cuba desk.
There's all these little areas and they focus on policy and
what is happening in those areas in order to, you know, sort of
influence state craft that the the executive puts out and
theoretically they're supposed to advise and then the the
president makes a decision, sends that information back and
then they go and implement whatever the president says.
That's the way it's supposed to work.
What's wild is every single desk is populated almost entirely.
Now, there may be some desk that I didn't see, but the ones that
I saw were populated almost entirely by people that were
born in the country that they're advocating for the United States
on behalf of. So what does that mean?
That means that ethnically, Chinese people, people born in
China, are running the China desk for the State Department.
Ukrainians are running the Ukrainian desk.
Russians are running the Russia desk.
People in the Balkans are dealing with the Balkans people.
Part of that makes sense, like they're the most expert, they're
the most interested, they have the family members and the
connections. But also don't they have the
biggest conflict of interest there?
Ain't that weird. It's weird to me.
And I don't know if there's a Palestine desk.
I didn't actually see one there. But I can guarantee you that the
people that are advocating in the various Middle Eastern areas
are also, generally speaking, going to be from those
countries. And we're at this very weird
problem with material support. Because if America believes in
free speech, and we believe that money is speech, then why can
you not give money to sport organizations that maybe I hate?
That's the real problem on the political right.
We are burdened by principle. We're burdened by the concept
that our ideas are supposed to make sense with each other.
I like to give the example of my father-in-law who has this,
like, really goofy idea about guns.
He doesn't trust the government in theory, although apparently
now he does. He's more and more becoming a
status, which is like the opposite of his old ideas, I
guess, because the state is now implementing more and more
leftist ideas. But my father-in-law used to
always tell me that, like, he didn't like the idea that
private ownership of guns, but he also didn't trust the police.
That's really hard to justify in your mind if you don't believe
in the police, which is that that kinetic organization that
can enforce and use violence on the population to to get the
population to obey government rules, but you also don't trust
the government. Why on earth would you believe
that only the police, only the government, would be the ones
who can own guns? That they seem like they're at
odds with each other and they and they're comfortably living
in that world on the political left.
There are many of their ideas that don't seem to make sense to
each other, like they champion victim groups.
And who has been more victimized, at least in the
last, I don't know, let's say, 100 years?
Who's been more victimized than the Jewish people who were
massacred by the Germans? And then strangely, like, it's
just not in fashion to talk about that anymore.
It's now fashionable to talk about this new group, and so
they're talking about Palestinians.
The thing about it is, is that if you're on the political
right, you have to be able to champion people speaking things
that you hate. You have to be able to say that
people. And this is an old liberal idea,
by the way. This is something that even like
the the ACLU used to defend, you used to be able to say it's OK
that you don't agree with me. I want our ideas to be at odds,
not our bodies. And that's less and less the
case, which is why we're getting more and more movement towards
political violence. That's why more and more we're
seeing things like this. This is the Mayday protest in
Seattle. Mayday, also known as
International Workers Day. International Workers Day is
synonymous with Marxist and communist.
It goes all the way back to I think like the 1890s was the
first version of it, where they were pushing this sort of
Bolshevik idea that they were pushing that there should be
this work. As the world unite, I want to
touch on this in one second. First I want to, I want to throw
out a a little read for our sponsor and this one is going to
go to Mad Hat Jerky. This is a good time to think
about snacks. You know what those people need,
those hungry protesters. They need snacks.
They need high quality snacks. And they're not getting it.
They're complaining. They want meals to be brought to
them. You guys get your own at Mad Hat
Jerky 'cause you're a capitalist who believes in spending your
money on where you want Mad Hat jerky.com/kyle 20% off.
If you use the promo code Kyle, Kyle 20% off.
That's a pretty good amount. You guys can figure out what it
is that you like. My favorites.
I've said it before, but I like the original.
It's actually very good. When you have an original that
really rocks, that's helpful. Can check out the original,
check out the black truffle, and check out the the roasted
garlic. All three of those are my top
three faves. Depends on if you want a little
bit more or you want a little bit more spice.
Matt hat jerky.com, Matt with two T's hat with
1tjerkyspelledout.com/kyle and get yourself squared away.
Once you figure out what you like, you can get a subscription
on there and have it regularly sent.
You don't have to think about it.
That's the way I operate. I have to set up a subscription
on mine. I'm just, I've just decided what
I'm going to do and I'm going to do like 12 ounce bags.
So that's the way I work. OK?
I want to get into this this mayday.
Why in the world are the are the commies?
Because that's what they are, the mayday protesters and I
remember these going back to when I was in high school.
They used to have these big riots every every May 1st right
in Seattle of all places. Same story in Portland.
It's kind of spilled into that space, that Pacific Northwestern
protest zone which I had to go deal with when I was in the FBI.
They even the even the analysts that were working for the FBI,
they said this is Portland and we love our activists.
It's like do you. It was a like a six foot, seven,
like 290 LB effeminate, gayish guy telling me that they love
their activists in Portland. And I'm reading this story.
This story comes from is this from local news?
This is from a local Fox affiliate in Seattle.
OK, this goes all the way to just a couple days ago.
So we've now gone from October of last year right down to May
Mayday. Protests in Seattle include pro
Palestinian supporters. Here's where it's going to get
really funny for me. Like I said, your free speech
line is right up until the point when you stop being peaceful.
And we heard about this during the BLM stuff, right?
They had to claim that it was mostly peaceful.
Fiery, but mostly peaceful. Does that remember like you?
You ring some bells back there. Look at this opening line here.
Seattle workers and activists around the world marked Mayday
with largely peaceful protests Wednesday over rising prices and
calls for greater labor rights. Pro Palestinian sentiments were
also on display. Why?
What does the Palestinian sentiment have to do with
workers of the world unite? It's almost none.
I don't know that there's great industry there.
It doesn't seem like this is an autonomous little region that is
governed by a terrorist organization which has put
billionaires into high rise apartments in Qatar.
The founders of Hamas and all the big names there have left
and absconded with literally billions with AB dollars to go
live fancy lives in safe and lovely places.
Meanwhile the the so-called plight of the Palestinians
continues as they struggle to have like basic ends meet.
Why are those people being lionized by the commies and why
are we already going to the largely peaceful protest?
Remember it was mostly peaceful before.
I would suggest to you that if this is where Fox 13 landed in
Seattle, and I'm sure they live on the political left, Fox or
otherwise, if it's if it's largely peaceful now instead of
mostly peaceful, that's where we're going to live.
And this doesn't ever. And so they go on in this
article and they talk about how they've been campuses from
Columbia, which we've shown you. UCLA, which we've shown you
University of Texas at Austin, that's down the street from me.
We didn't show you any of that. But there's the same they carry
out people, they drag them out like toddlers.
Portland State University in Oregon, that's no surprise.
University of Washington in Seattle, hundreds of people
being taken into custody. People get taken into custody
when they break the law. And you know how tolerant they
are in most of these places, especially in Seattle and
Portland. So if they're picking people up,
there's two possibilities. One, local law enforcement has
decided that this is too far and they're not going to do 2020
again, which was incredibly disruptive to businesses.
You know, I don't know if downtown Portland, maybe
somebody will send me a picture, but when I was there, it didn't
look like downtown Portland could recover.
It wasn't quite as bad as Beirut in the 80s, but it was bad.
Everything was boarded up. There were, there were signs on
the windows that were begging the mostly or largely peaceful
protesters to not destroy And ransack.
They said we're on your side, Just let us sell Patagonia
stuff. That was the Patagonia store.
We're on your side. Please don't loot the Apple
store again. These people were were moving,
you know, sort of that that they took their rage out wherever it
was because it wasn't about rage and it wasn't about moving that
needle. And what's really interesting to
me is I don't think it's about workers.
What conditions do American workers not have that people in
the 1919 Mayday riots in Cleveland?
What what conditions do they not have met?
The interesting thing is a lot of these movements, it's the
political left continues to be what they call a progressive
movement and progressives don't know when to stop.
That's really the thing. Once the goal is achieved, they
keep going onward. First generation feminism,
second generation, 3rd wave. It continues to go on to the
point where now quote UN quote, feminists are arguing for men
with penises to be in women's locker rooms.
That's how far gone you are when you don't have a hard barrier
because your ideology is is so malleable and you're so able to
to handle that cognitive dissonance of things not making
sense. Eventually you get to crazy town
and I would argue to you that all the workers movements, the
greater labor rights, we have the most safe conditions for
workers in history to the point where it's actually so
detrimental to businesses it makes no sense.
The only thing that doesn't exist is a universal basic
income and a universal wage that is livable for every job.
Not every job is supposed to be a living wage.
When you're a 15 or a 16 year old, the way that my first job
was working at a baskin-robbins, you're not supposed to be able
to support a family on it because you're 15 or 16.
You're supposed to be living under someone else's roof.
You're getting job skills, you're getting customer service
experience. You get something of value in
addition to just the wage. The wage is just sort of like
the nominal requirement. You're actually working the same
way that people used to do in in apprenticeships.
You're learning how business and human beings and people and
adults that are not your family operate.
Real simple, straightforward. The claims that we don't have
the safest work environment in history.
We have OSHA on the federal level, We have state labor laws,
we have state minimum wages. We have all of these
requirements. We have health inspectors that
come in. We have job site inspectors, we
have building conditions inspectors there.
There are ways to shut down all of these things if they are not
safe for the workers, which is why I would say that the workers
rights movement has moved on from its capability.
It doesn't need to be there anymore, which is how they end
up picking up all this garbage and why they end up supporting,
you know, other general economy causes which have nothing to do
with them. There's nothing about
Palestinians that has to do with workers rights in the United
States. Nothing.
Zero. It doesn't stop these people.
There's no cognitive dissonance. The, the, the marching goes on
ever forward. And you get to the point where
you have this story from Breitbart, which is just two
days ago. It says the University of
Chicago thinkers like the University of Chicago has some
of the great, the most incredible minds in this country
and maybe in the world. When you go there, you can feel
how high the IQ is on that campus.
And yet anti Israel encampment demands HIV tests, dental dans
and Plan B. These are the demands of the
maniacs. What on earth does that have to
do? What in the world does it have
to do with what's going on in Palestine And the fact of the
matter is it's nothing nothing whatsoever.
An organizer involved in the anti Israel pro Hamas encampment
obviously this is a right leaning publication here
released a list of needs supplies and they included plan,
BHIV test, Vaseline and much much more.
I had to go look I I sort of know as a medic I guess I've
I've I've been around as someone who went through a health class
in high school. I know what a dental dam is in
my head. I sort of it's like a polymer
sheet that is worn on the woman's genitals so that oral
sex can happen without a fluid transfer.
What the hell? And by the way, the weirdest
thing from today's research. This morning as I was putting
this together, the CDC actually has an entire website including
many graphics which I have spared you on the visual channel
of how to apply a dental dam and how it works and how to create a
dental dam. If you only have a condom, you
can actually cut the condom at the top and the bottom and flay
it out and and make like this rectangular you cut down the
slit, you have a rectangular little barrier.
Yuck. Why is our government spending
money on that in a time when we are so safe that our government
is telling people how they can have non procreative oral sex in
a way that sounds horrible. Sounds like you're going to get
all kinds of gross stuff in your face.
This is what they're demanding at this pro Palestine, pro
Hamas, anti Israel camp because it's never about the thing.
It just starts in one place and it moves forward.
I see you guys in the chat calling out the Soros
Foundation. Yes, the Open Society
Foundation. Yeah, the money behind it is all
disruptive. The interesting point to me is
not that there's money behind it of people that are that are, you
know, anti American and generally speaking don't care
about our conservative values, don't care about our
constitutional values. The interesting thing to me is
that there are children that are willing to participate in it.
And where does that come from? Because that's that's the dark
place that I want to go with this.
One last little piece here you'll remember the exact same
situation happened under the George Floyd protest in 2020,
the so-called Summer of Love. I found this.
This is from a website called In Defense of Marxism, which is
pretty funny. This is going back to June of
2020, right in the middle of the weird stuff.
I was dealing with these people in Washington, DC when I was
working for the Washington field office for the Bureau.
And there was no good answer on the federal side, which is
probably good. It's not really a federal issue,
but the city of DC just let people run wild and take over
places, says the protest movement sparked by brutal by
the brutal police murder of George Floyd.
I think that is very, very highly suspect, at least the way
that they framed it. Yeah, he was an unarmed black
man, but that doesn't change the fact that you bring people into
custody anyway. That sparked protests in over 20
countries. And here's the key workers and
youth marched and demonstrated against racism, which has
nothing to do with labor conditions at all, and no
argument was even made. They didn't even They don't even
have to make the argument. So the question is this.
Why are they able to so quickly link racism, Palestine, any of
these other sort of leftist causes?
Why do they link it with Marxism right away?
And I think the answer actually is coming from The Daily Signal.
We're going to go there in just one second.
First, I want to just say if you guys want to sponsor the
program, if you want to support the program, you can go to
mypillow.com/kyle again, mypillow.com/kyle.
I am on the the regular guy. I refuse to pay for shipping if
I don't have to. I'd rather wait.
And in this Internet age, I expect things to just pop up my
door like tomorrow. It's going to be really good for
me to move further out of civilization.
My my towels have not arrived from my pillow so I'm I'm
eagerly awaiting the what they call bath sheets, the huge huge
towels because I'm in need of some new towels and they're
inbound. I use my own promo code when I
did. So folks, you can use the promo
code Kyle Kyle Promo code Kyle 4 letters Saves you up to 50%.
Think in my case I think we saved like 30%, Knocked it down
pretty good. Check out mypillow.com/kyle if
you guys are in the market for new bedding or for any of the
the various different tools out there.
And thanks to Rose for who always, who always throws the
links in the chat. I do appreciate that, Rose.
It's very thoughtful. All right, here's where I think
this goes. Like I said, Marxist.
They're, they're happy to find common cause with everybody.
This is an interesting piece from The Daily Signal.
This is written by a woman named * Parker.
I'm assuming a woman. That makes sense to me.
The article says no, Demonstrations today are not
like the 1960s. A lot of people have tried to
make this parallel, that this is exactly like the American Civil
rights movement. I know that the people that are
in these protests like to fashion themselves as fighter
for civil liberties and for civil rights, but they're not.
And there's a really important undercurrent that is missing,
says the Current demonstrations on college campuses against
Israel remind some people of the unrest on college campuses in
the 1960s that famously added pretty badly at places like Kent
State. Not a real good thing, but the
comparison is not a good one, says Parker.
The unrest of the 1960s was defined by the war in Vietnam
and by the civil rights movements.
There is a moral justification that is in there that is missing
right now. When you say there's a war over
in in Gaza and in Israel, is that not the same thing?
People are not being treated well.
The civil rights movement is really the big piece here.
I think they both had practical personal impacts on young
Americans in their own country. American soldiers were fighting
and dying in Vietnam. There was a real life and death
impact on all Americans, and specifically the youngest
generation Americans. The military draft was
operative, so on and so forth. The official number of American
soldiers killed in Vietnam stands at 58,220 and although
there were legitimate moral concerns about American
involvement in the war, the moral concerns were accompanied
by Americans having real skin in the gang.
Which is a real possibility, by the way, if this continues on.
Also, the civil rights movement had a real personal moral impact
on all Americans. The youth are always highly
sensitive to the moral failings of those around them.
When properly tuned, young people will have a very strong
sense of justice. My daughters are a great
reminder to me of this. My young daughters, my 5 year
old, knows very clearly when things are not fair.
How many times do you remember that when you were a kid?
It's not fair. And what is the job of adults?
The the job of adults is to temper your expectations of
fundamental fairness. You have to know the world is
not fair. So what is your job?
Your job is to go out and live in a way and model behavior that
is more fair. That's what we do for our
children. If we're doing it right.
Where does that fairness come from though?
This article continues on, talks about some of the reality of
segregation and Jim Crow's, but it says here, and this is the
real key, I think, to this article, but also to our
understanding of what we're looking at in contrast to the
woke activism of today, which is totally political in character.
The movement, and they're saying the movement in the 1960s was
led by a charismatic and articulate black pastor and had
a religious moral tone that was rooted in Christianity.
That's the big difference. It's the biggest difference
right now. Today it is a 100% political,
that is to say leftist, that is to say a a a non godly religion.
I have a little piece that I did with Edify the folks over at
Catholic Vote. They did a nice little sort of
Prager U style thing. It's my contention that leftism
is a substitute religion, and I think these protests indicate
the same. It's a substitute religion that
has its own God. It's an imperfect God because
it's the God of government. When all the good things flow
from the government, why would you not consider that to be the
thing that you worship? They have their own sacraments,
do they? Not?
Sacraments like abortion? Climate Paganism.
Chaining yourself to the ground Marching.
These are all sacraments being arrested for the cause.
And this isn't the cause where you're saying, listen, black
people should be allowed to sit and have lunch at a lunch
counter around white people. That seems like a moral good.
It's rooted in a in a fundamental equity.
You're talking about people that have no jobs, that are saying
give us dental dams so we can have oral sex in our crappy
tents on a college campus that we don't even attend.
We know that doesn't make any sense.
There's a priesthood. These are government workers and
the media that are the acolytes of it that are out there pushing
this message. Political leftism.
By all accounts, including by the Title 7 definition that the
United States government uses to define religion, it would count
as what we would call a sincerely held belief system.
It doesn't have to make any sense.
That's why Pastafarians are a real thing.
If you guys have never heard of the Pastafarians, go look up the
Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
It's simply a joke. It's simply a hyperbolic proof
that you can have completely illogical and nonsensical, you
know, theocratic ideas and you can go out there and and be
protected in America. That's the whole point of our
system. But the other thing was, is that
they were also rooted in a non violence.
The non violence comes from that Christian worldview that we
would accept suffering on ourselves in order to change the
hearts of others. That's a Christ focused idea.
Does that mean that everybody in the civil rights movement was
great and peaceful? No, of course not.
But they showed that you actually triumphed over physical
aggression by showing how evil it was, the contrast in the
world. And that's not what's going on
right now. These people are willing to take
actual aggression. They're not passive aggressive.
They're aggressive, aggressive stepping into traffic like a
like a Marxist speed bump as I saw flying across in the chat
earlier, being a Marxist idiot who steps into traffic and stops
people who are trying to get to work, That's problematic.
There are better ways to do it. And by the way, the thing that
you were supporting has nothing to do with the ideas.
The people that are going out there and making the movements,
they are not based in a in a unifying principle.
That's why the civil rights movements were were much more
amenable to people that would otherwise not be persuaded.
They'd be like, oh, you're a bunch of leftist.
It's like, well, you're a bunch of leftist who also believe in
the same thing. I believe, and you're showing me
that what's going on in society is not living up to the value
systems they have. The civil rights movement
challenged people to look at their own Christian faith and
say, are we living up to it? Is it happening?
And this country, whether you like it or not, is a Christian
nation, at least by the majority.
The numbers don't lie. That's why it is.
That's why these young people who have no religion are looking
out and saying, OK, communism is our is our jam Marxism.
They have a pretty name for it. I went to a website which is
called the Victims of Communism. I found this very interesting.
This is a quote they had and they talk about the the six
things that are required for all socialized or communist
countries. How many of these start lining
up? This is a a quote from a a
political prisoner being held in Romania like 100 years ago.
Because the collective took everything, all property, our
house, our farm, everything became property of the state,
everything in your life you had to do as they said to do it.
The communist ordered everyone to think what they thought.
There was no freedom of speech, there was no freedom of
anything. If you said something the
communist didn't like, you were arrested and sent to prison.
There's a strong movement in this country of young people
that feel this way. And like I said, you can go all
the way back to the beginning of the first Mayday riots and the
and the Mayday movement, which is the 1890s.
But this is a little Wikipedia article.
I typed in Mayday riots looking for something about Seattle and
then in the in the early 2000s. And instead I got this thing
about Cleveland in 1919 series of violent demonstrations.
It was in Cleveland, OH, an industrial city.
The riots took place by a socialist organizer, Charles
Ruthenberg Group of Unionists and socialists and communists
and Industrial Workers of the world unite.
They were all protesting against the conviction and American
intervention in the Russian Civil war against the
Bolsheviks. This is a piece I found from
this. Victims of Communism says these
regimes possess 6 key characteristics.
These are the characteristics I would argue that leftism has
really Co opted and This is why they've gone too far.
The idea of liberalism is not tragic.
It's a good foil to like overall that sort of the static position
of of conservatism, liberalism and conservatism in conflict
equals probably a a pretty good outcome.
That's why the American experiment has been OK the
political left and the right kind of hashing out their ideas
and policy. That's not what happens when one
moves too far. This article I'm just reading
off the screen here. It says these regimes possess 6
key characteristics #1 unofficial ideology #2A1 Party
authoritarian state. How much do they love that idea
#3A Monopoly on violence. That's the key.
That's ownership of the police. That's why weaponization of our
government is such a problem #4. Control of all information, mass
media including books and radio and television and movies and
now the Internet #5 Government planned and centrally controlled
economy. Go look at the Green New Deal
and some of these other ideas. And lastly, the use of Communist
Party controlled terroristic security services.
That's the that's the final implementation.
When you have all monopoly on violence, then you can also have
this sort of terroristic Security Service, which I would
argue to you is our FBI at this point.
Not because everybody in there is a terrorist, not because
everybody in there is doing something that's evil.
They don't even think they are. What I'm getting at is that it
is the state sanctioned arm and it is weaponized.
It is being run by a DOJ and the DOJ is wholly captured.
It's an ideology captured organization and they are the
ones that have the monopoly on violence in this country.
Really, really, really dangerous stuff.
Super scary to me. I'm going to bring up Catholic
vote because we're going to talk about something that's out there
that's going to sew some of the stuff together.
If you guys want to support Catholic Vote, you can go to
catholicvote.org. You'll notice in the show notes
today that there is a link to thestore.catholicvote.org and
that store is a place that you can actually buy this new book,
which I think I have. Maybe I do.
Did I grab it on the screen? I'm not sure.
If I put it on the screen. I didn't put it on the screen.
There's a a new book that's coming out.
It's pre-order only right now. It's called For God, Country and
Sanity, How Catholics Can Save America edited by my friend
Brian Birch. I have a chapter in there that
you guys might find very interesting.
There are many other chapters. Well it's 13 different chapters
from 13 different authors, all of whom have a Catholic
worldview. I think that it will resonate
with many of you if you guys want to pre-order the book, it's
not very expensive. It's like 16 bucks and you can
get a little taste on all this stuff.
It's a lot of different people. I'll throw it on the screen
tomorrow. You'll see the cover's great.
It just shows that Liberty and Lady Liberty, specifically the
the Statue of Liberty, is under assault by all these different
groups, whether they be the woke types, whether it be the Marxist
types, whether it be the the, you know, all cops are bastards
slash anarchists. There's an awful lot of people
out here that are taking shots at it because America is
vulnerable and America's vulnerable because it's lost
that focus. Like we talked about in the
civil rights movement of that Christian worldview, when you
don't have principles, then you are susceptible to all kinds of
nonsense. And this is one of those things.
All right, I want to get deeper into this.
You'll see why this relates. Like I said, Catholic Vote, one
of our sponsors but also the publisher of The Loop.
This coming out of today's Loop and I think it's worth our time
to discuss it, says a poll over half of Americans concerned over
reliability of election news coverage.
Just real quick in the chat. Which half of America do you
think is worried about election news coverage?
Is it people on the political right or people on the political
left that are worried that we're going to get bad coverage and
it's going to be nonsensical? Because this is this would be an
interesting test for you guys out there.
Either put in the comments, but you can also throw in the chat
Right now. According to a new poll, over
half of Americans are concerned about new sources that will
report inaccurate information about the 2024 election cycle.
Republicans are more likely to feel this way compared to
Democrats. What do we think all?
Wow. Republicans are interested in
getting closer to the truth with a capital T Republicans don't
want just feel good news. 53% of Americans in total.
So more than half, but not much more, say, quote.
They're extremely or very concerned that news
organizations will report inaccuracies or misinformation
during the election, so sayeth The Associated Press on
Wednesday of last week. Per the AP, 47% of the
respondents expressed serious concerns that news outlets would
report information that has not been confirmed or verified.
Why would that be problematic? You think, having unconfirmed
reports, that would be called misinformation, By the way, by
our government, Misinformation is things that is information
that's wrong, but it's on accident.
It's not in purpose. We didn't, we didn't intend to
mislead you, but we did because we reported something
inaccurate. That's the claim.
Hmm. 47% are concerned about that.
Do you know what's really interesting?
One of the things that I exposed as a whistleblower that I had
people come and share with me documents indicating the FBI's
what is it called the. It's the P something or other.
It's it's a it's an organization out of headquarters that was
looking. It was part of the election
crimes Task force. They put out this pamphlet, this
informational 1 sheet to agents, the people that have the guns,
the people that have the monopoly on violence in this
country. Right.
At least the legal monopoly and that one sheet said that
information, misinformation and disinformation are actually
federal election crimes. That's false, by the way.
But that's what happens when you have people that have an
ideology that have no background in constitutional law, do not
even understand the requirements and what the agency is supposed
to do. But they know that they're
pushing that that concentrated ideology forward and they're
willing to use the the legal and state mandated means, which
include violence, to be able to go out there, do that.
By the way, if you could be arrested for misinformation.
Oh wait, we already did that in this country, didn't we?
We had Douglas Mackie on here talking about how his meme,
which was a joke and obviously a joke, they referred to that as
conspiracy against rights. Oh, weird, because we're
actually prosecuting Donald Trump under the special counsel,
under conspiracy against rights, something that's made-up.
Donald Trump is allowed to have ideas, even if they are wrong,
and he's allowed to vocalize them like every other American.
And he's allowed to take actions based on the belief that they
are correct, even if it turns out that they are wrong later
on. And we are now seeing that being
prosecuted in this country. Over half of Americans are
concerned about the reliability of election news coverage.
Why would it be that people on the political left are not as
worried about this sort of thing?
Why are they not worried about inaccurate information?
The people who apparently have the most trust The most trust in
the news were 13% of black adults, 9% of Hispanics, and 3%
of whites. It's very weird.
Have a great deal of confidence in the news that they obtain.
Younger adults are less engaged in election news, and they also
have less confidence in the media than the older people.
But older people have more concerns about inaccurate
information. Interesting.
You mean like the older you are, the wiser you are, and the more
Wiley you are, the more that you have life experience, the more
likely you are to do what we talked about here.
You know that you want to believe things, but you also
trust no one. Maybe you grew up and watched
The X-Files in the 90s like I did, and you know that that's
the right answer. That is the right answer, by the
way, for the left and the right. We're all on the same page here.
We should all distrust the means of government that is pushing
this information out because it can't be trusted.
They've proven it. You want to know how check this
weaponize craziness out. This is it.
A report that I touched on the other day.
I want to get deeper into it. We're going to probably run over
the hour simply because of this story.
This is coming from Mary Margaret Olhan reporting
exclusive. Conservative leaders are calling
on DOJ's Kristen Clark to resign following the Daily Signal
report. This came out on Friday
afternoon. Now conservative leaders are
talking about the issue with this woman.
Kristen Clark is the head of the DOJ Civil Rights Division.
She's the one who set the policy of going after people for face
Act violations, including Mark Out, who we've had on the show.
She's the one that's been doing the, like setting the policy for
prosecutions of pro lice, of pro-life activists that have
been standing outside of abortion clinics that are not
engaged in mostly peaceful protest.
They're engaged in totally, totally peaceful protests, and
yet she's not a real peaceful person from what we saw in
there, apparently to a 2006. She didn't.
She didn't talk about an arrest when she was being nominated and
confirmed in the Senate. Tom Cotton from Arkansas, 2021,
asked her point blank, Have you ever been arrested?
And her answer was no. She said no, I have not been
arrested. She didn't disclose it.
It was expunged, but being arrested is being arrested.
Look, I was arrested when I was in the Air Force.
I was arrested and I was thrown into a cell and I spent the
night there. The end result of it was
nothing. The end result was like a letter
of reprimand. The same day that I got a letter
of commendation from the same supervisor, the same NCO that
wrote me a letter of reprimand also wrote me a letter of
commendation the same day. One for owning guns and having
them locked up in a trailer that was like sitting behind
Constantino wire. And then the other was for
performing above job duties. And I'm performing above rank
for like 6 months and essentially doing his job.
But I I did get arrested and I did disclose it to the FBI on my
background check because it happened.
And there's paperwork that documented in the same way that
the FBI does a background check on every single political
appointee that every single presidential administration
comes in and puts out. Kristen Clark had one of those
background checks. I would almost guarantee you
that it came from a group called the Spin Squad Spin out of
Washington field Office. I know people on that squad.
I know a couple people in that squad.
They're usually, like, getting close to retirement and they're
bored. And what do they do?
They go out and conduct interviews.
They do background checks on political appointees.
That's the entirety of the spin Squad.
I don't know what it stands for, but it is an acronym of some
kind, just like everything else. You know what's real weird?
The Spin squad is actually pretty good at what they do
because they're not on any time limit.
They have very seasoned, experienced folks that know how
to do this kind of stuff. And what do they do?
They go and they send leads all over the country.
I've done interviews on this kind of stuff.
We had a federal judge that was being nominated in our area and
I went out and did some interviews at family, friends of
hers or people that knew her as a child.
That's what you do when you do a background check for a high
political position like this. This woman, Kristen Clark, she
definitely had a file created by the spin squad, like I said,
almost assuredly from Washington field office where I used to
work. And it would have included an
NCIC report showing that she was arrested in 2006 for stabbing
her husband with a kitchen knife, a guy named Reginald
Avery. Now she claimed that he was
domestically abusing her, that it was a self-defense, but she
was arrested for it. None the less, that's an arrest
when you don't tell people of your arrest and the fact that
you've decided to defend yourself with a steak knife.
Maybe it was totally justified, maybe it wasn't.
Shouldn't that have been something brought up?
In fairness, shouldn't that have been part of the advice and
consent part when they when they nominated her and she was
confirmed to run the Civil Rights Division, having a
violent stabbing in her history? Like I said, maybe she was
righteous, but maybe she wasn't and maybe it was a political
move that that dropped that thing off.
A lot of weird things happen in in households we're seeing right
now, guys like Mike Glover facing a domestic violence
charge. A lot of things happen in
households that we can't understand.
I don't jump into, like I don't understand what went on with
Steven Crowder. I don't get into that either.
There's a lot of things that that belong outside.
There should be an apolitical organization.
But if you can't trust your judiciary to do their job, which
is say yes, there was objectively paperwork staying.
This woman was arrested and she lied and said no, I've never
been arrested. You've now lied in front of
Congress. Here's the real problem.
Our FBI definitely had this information.
I will, I will, I will assert there is zero possibility that
they did not know that she was lying.
Did they give that to Republicans?
Did they have access to that? Did the DOJ just say we're going
to cover this thing up and we're going to paper over it?
We're going to bury this, this information so that we can get
our person in because we prefer to have Kristen Clark running
this organization so she can run after Catholics that are
pro-life captured. Ideology, folks, this is what
weaponized government looks like.
Real scary. Really, really weird.
I don't like it. And I know for a fact like that
is the way that those organizations run.
That is, the way that those background checks happen.
There's no chance they wouldn't have an NCIC.
That's the most basic level check, and it would show it.
It would show that there was a stabbing, that there was an
arrest, and what it was for. Even if the charges were
dismissed, even if it was expunged, it would show up.
So what other things are out there?
Who else has been confirmed with background checks that were
covered up by a DOJ that the FBI maybe did their job, maybe
decided to bury it in there? Like, I have to imagine the FBI
agents don't care. Like they don't.
I didn't care when I went. In fact, the people you meet on
these background interviews, they're really, really lovely.
They're almost always very nice. Even if they don't agree with
anything you say politically, they're usually friendly.
And why are we tolerating somebody in the Civil Rights
Division of all places? Just because she's like a
diversity hire doesn't mean she should sit there.
If she was lying about. That feels like a big problem to
me. All right.
Last thing I want to touch on was this piece about birth
control. They were requesting it in the
camps. Kind of an interesting thing to
see an alignment with the folks. They've a lot of these
movements, like I said, they've gone so far that they've
actually internalized the problem that they that they said
that they were going to fight against.
There's a lot of talk right now about hormonal birth control.
The so-called the Pill, TikTok is deleting certain things,
talking about the harms of hormonal contraceptives.
Washington Post ran a cover article discussing it.
There's this article from this woman named Katie Breckenridge.
It's also covered in today's loop.
This is from angelesnews.com. This is the particular article
evidence mounts for why women should do away with quote UN
quote the Pill. And there are people on the left
and the right and there's certainly a lot of women that
are starting to re evaluate where this thing came from.
Even the left-leaning feminist scholars are starting to ask
these questions says, you know, the pill has changed the view on
what it means to be a female, the value of motherhood and what
kinds of health outcomes we're willing to accept for
consequence. Free sex.
Well, either way there's never consequence free sex.
There's always something that happens.
There is some version of a of a psychological connection that
happens. You can't get away from it
unless you just break. But I found it very interesting
that this article ties in that Margaret Sanger was one of the
first people to really push the effort to eliminate poor people
and mental illnesses and people who had disabilities by putting
them on the pill. It was a chemical sterilization
option. And here you go.
From a left-leaning source like history.com.
It says the first birth control pills used were on Puerto Rican
women as Guinea pigs. Go figure.
Would you imagine that the political left would lionize the
efforts of Puerto Rican women using birth control?
But would you also feel like they want to cover up the fact
that some of them died in the original experiments and Novid
was the first one that they were pushing out there.
They had three women died during the testing phase of that drug,
and they didn't investigate their deaths.
They're just fine with it. So many of these, quote UN
quote, control mechanisms, whether it be birth control or
gun control. I'm sure there's plenty of
others. They all have these very racist,
bizarre roots. It's coming from history.com.
Sanger thought that women would never be free until they had the
ability to control their own bodies.
But her views on birth control were also rooted in philosophies
that would raise modern eyebrows.
That's a nice way of saying that historians contest a long
standing myth that Sanger thought non white people should
be prevented from procreating. Oh, that's a myth apparently.
But they do agree that Sanger supported eugenics, which is the
same thing. Like I said, they're apologist.
It's pretty many a theory that, quote, UN quote, undesirable
populations could be reduced or eliminated by controlling their
breeding. Yeah, Margaret Sanger was behind
it, just like she's behind. Like all the all the the the,
what do you call them, the abortion clinics that are
hanging out there in black neighborhoods and other poor
neighborhoods. Isn't that interesting?
And we've got a black lady in charge of the Civil Rights
Division that decided to go after Catholics who are
protesting out in front of them and trying to make these women
walking in there aware that the person that they are carrying is
another unique human life and that is not God's plan for them.
It's just interesting, it's just interesting to me when we loop
together that these movements get Co opted by Marxists.
The Marxists are godless by nature.
They don't have a North Star. They don't have a objective sort
of this is right, this is wrong operational morality idea and
the and when you think that the ends justify the means that
maybe you're OK with a couple of Puerto Rican women dying and
making sure that the the the people that are a little bit
lesser on the socio political scale don't breed.
And maybe we should get rid of a lot more blacks in this country.
Like is that really the the argument that we're going to be
hearing. But these things all are they
come right out of one another. They lead one after another and
it almost always starts with a lack of God and it ends with
anybody that we don't like can be killed.
And it doesn't matter whether they're unborn children or
whether they are women or whether they are just people
that are in the way politically. It's kind of scary stuff.
Like I said, they're always Marxists at that root, but that
always comes back to this godless evil worth knowing,
worth knowing where these movements start and where they
end up. You guys, you can support a lot
of your sort of red pill knowledge, if you will, by
getting the the loop. You're going to get a lot more
of this kind of stuff in the loop from Catholic boats.
I'll just plug them one more time.
Let me also say, if you guys want to support my buddy who is
a objectively awesome human being, the O'boyle family and my
friend Garrett O'boyle, you can support the merch store by going
to the dash. suspendables.com. They're the opposite of the
godless heathens. They are the opposite of these
Marxists. They are capitalists, slinging
T-shirts and other merch items, hats and pins and so on.
Go to thedashsuspendables.com. Use the promo code Kyle 'cause
you are also a capitalist. You want to save 10% on your
own, 10% off using promo code. Kyle the Dash suspendables.com.
If you want to support the merch store, you can wear stuff like
this one here. This is the new TKSS or Kyle
Seraphin Show the Kyle Seraphin Show shirt.
It's got the badge. It's got the logo on the back.
This one's in blue. I'm a big fan of the blue.
I'm a big fan of the red, like the OD green.
I can't figure out which I like the most.
I think the one that I like the least is the Gray one, but it's
also the one that shows up the best so I I don't hate it.
And the black on black is really cool too.
Anyway, check out their comfortable T-shirts.
I'm wearing them every single day.
So you guys know that's the uniform for the show.
The Dash suspendables.com and support the merch program.
Let's do a five star review before we get out here.
I I did have some videos I showed.
You know what this is? This is where this stuff goes.
I'll just show you right now. This is where this goes right
now. This was at a graduation at the
University of Michigan. In the University of Michigan
Theatre and Music Department, a bunch of pro Palestine people
started marching through. If it doesn't make it in the
theatre graduation, all it tells me is that the older and the
wiser, the the sort of cagey parents that are paying for this
stuff, they know. They know what's going on here.
Let's try this one out real quick.
Yeah, they're drowning out the pro Palestine from the river to
the sea crowd by just marching and calling out USA.
That's not a theater graduation. You can imagine.
By the way, it sounds really good to chant USA.
It feels pretty good compared to hearing people doing some, like,
Marxist nonsense. All right, I got one little
taste. Palate cleanser.
We'll do that right after This is do the Five Star View first.
And there's two of them. I wanted to read them because
they for for one time in history, things have all
aligned. This is a very recent one.
This is from Jaybird and Don Dowling, and they're both people
who deliver packages for a living, Jaybird says.
When I go on dates, I always tell them I work for the
government, I'm a letter carrier for the USPS and my job is more
dangerous than an FBI agent. Jaybird, you've said that
before. I've said it to.
You know why? You're right.
It is more dangerous to be a letter carrier 100%, especially
in some neighborhoods. And then Don Dowling saying
happy 300th anniversary or three hundredth episode rather TKSS 5
stars. Your show has become a daily
listen. While I work, I'm a FedEx
Courier for 40 plus years now. I realize I miss some of the
visuals here, but still a great show.
We appreciate you listening and the Five star review.
You guys can leave your own if you want to do so.
On Apple, the show link is in there.
If you're listening on Spotify. It'll prompt you for questions,
comments, sarcastic remarks. Don't don't leave out the
sarcastic remarks, especially if you're doing something that's
more dangerous than an FBI agent.
So we do appreciate all those as well.
Let me throw a little fun video at you.
I found this this weekend. I think we're going to do a
series of these. This guy's name is Tyler
Champagne. I think I'm saying it correctly.
He's on Instagram, which I hate. But I love this video because if
you have a toddler and you are instructing them in the ways of
the world, there is a phase when they don't digest your Christian
values, or any other values for that matter.
They're just toddlers. And this guy has the Toddler
Motivational podcast Episode one.
This is the first taste of it. Sink into this for a moment.
Just remember, break the mold. Mom, you're old.
I'm the reason your coffee is cold.
I don't sleep at night. Sleep is for.
Elderly people like my parents in their 30s.
When I'm sleeping, I'm not causing chaos, right when I'm
awake, I can continually cause chaos throughout the day.
Concentric circumference. Want to know what I had for
breakfast today? I licked 1 Grape.
That's all I need. I don't eat food.
Food is a waste of time when I'm chewing, when I'm swallowing,
not causing chaos. OK?
Licking a grape gives me enough energy to torment my parents for
an entire morning. I don't swallow water.
OK, another waste of time. Time equals chaos.
I hold water in my mouth for a little bit and then I spit it on
my shirt. I don't need to drink it to
become hydrated. I took a 10 minute nap in the
car today. That's all I need.
My parents wanted me to nap longer.
Guess what? Highway speeds.
It's like napping. It's like 60 times the amount of
sleep. It's like napping in dog years.
Today my mom tried to put my pants on the right way and I was
like, excuse me, miss. I don't subscribe to the
traditional pants system. I'm a pockets on the front type
of guy. Break the mold, Mom, you're old.
I'm the reason your coffee is cold.
If you have a toddler, if you raise a toddler, you know
exactly what he's talking about. Especially the hydration theory
of just putting it in his mouth and then spitting it out.
Why do kids do that stuff? Yeah, clearly this dude Tyler is
raising a child that is on the Steve friend diet of even 1
almond. You start with liquid grape and
you work your way up to 1 almond.
Anyway folks, make sure you are following the show over on
rumble.com/kyle Serafin. Make sure you've hit the like
button. Follow subscribe if you are so
inclined. If you want to vote on the
music, make sure you're subscribed.
Otherwise, we don't care what you think we do.
But we don't. We don't, do we?
Again, thanks to the chat moderators for doing their jobs.
You guys can see it scrolling across the screen.
We'll see you again tomorrow for another Kyle Serafin show.
I'll say this. God bless you.
Don't be a Marxist. We'll see you tomorrow.
Thanks for listening to The Kyle Serafin Show streamed live
weekdays on rubble.com/kyle Serafin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth, Social and Instagram at Kyle
Serafin.