1
00:00:04,040 --> 00:00:06,920
Hey guys, welcome to What's the 
Call the podcast where sports 

2
00:00:06,920 --> 00:00:09,120
meets side eye. 
We're here to breakdown the 

3
00:00:09,120 --> 00:00:12,040
matches, the meltdowns and the 
moments that make us pause and 

4
00:00:12,040 --> 00:00:14,480
say, what was that call? 
I'm Theo. 

5
00:00:14,760 --> 00:00:16,880
I'm Andrea. 
And we're glad you're here. 

6
00:00:17,120 --> 00:00:20,080
Whether you're sports obsessed 
or just here for the drama, 

7
00:00:20,120 --> 00:00:22,800
there's a seat for you 
courtside, so let's dive in. 

8
00:00:25,200 --> 00:00:27,640
Hi guys. 
Welcome back to another episode.

9
00:00:27,640 --> 00:00:32,000
We have an exciting 1 today. 
We have Tamara Pren back with 

10
00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:34,200
us. 
So yeah, welcome back. 

11
00:00:34,680 --> 00:00:37,800
Thank you so much, it's such an 
honour to be asked back. 

12
00:00:37,840 --> 00:00:40,200
I'm hoping this can be a regular
thing. 

13
00:00:40,200 --> 00:00:41,680
Definitely. 
Of course. 

14
00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:47,960
So do we want to jump into the 
Australian Open and everything 

15
00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:51,360
that we've just witnessed over 
the last two weeks, but also 

16
00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:55,040
three days, if that makes sense.
I feel like the tournament was 

17
00:00:55,040 --> 00:00:58,320
really boring up until then. 
Yeah, basically. 

18
00:00:58,560 --> 00:01:02,560
And I think that the final three
days were so interesting that it

19
00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:07,600
has just completely almost 
obliterated things that I found 

20
00:01:08,480 --> 00:01:13,520
somewhat interesting beforehand 
when it was like, I feel like I 

21
00:01:13,520 --> 00:01:18,320
had a lot of things to say about
those things maybe on Thursday 

22
00:01:18,320 --> 00:01:21,280
night. 
But the moment I wake up on 

23
00:01:21,280 --> 00:01:23,760
Friday, all of those things 
began disintegrating and 

24
00:01:23,760 --> 00:01:26,520
disintegrating. 
And now I I can't even remember 

25
00:01:26,840 --> 00:01:28,480
who the other players at the 
tournament were. 

26
00:01:29,240 --> 00:01:31,120
Yeah, we feel the same way, 
right, Andrea? 

27
00:01:31,120 --> 00:01:34,200
Like we launched this podcast 
what, like 3 weeks ago now. 

28
00:01:34,200 --> 00:01:36,640
So I mean, we weren't grasping 
at straws. 

29
00:01:36,640 --> 00:01:40,240
We, we covered like some like 
all the like jokes around the 

30
00:01:40,240 --> 00:01:42,400
tournament, but there was 
nothing but like no results 

31
00:01:43,160 --> 00:01:44,920
results because there were no 
big upsets. 

32
00:01:44,920 --> 00:01:49,320
And but I guess that sometimes 
that makes for those really 

33
00:01:49,320 --> 00:01:52,480
interesting final rounds, right?
If it's just like your routine 

34
00:01:52,480 --> 00:01:56,200
wins in the first few rounds. 
Totally. 

35
00:01:56,200 --> 00:02:00,480
I feel like that's something 
that I have been thinking over 

36
00:02:00,800 --> 00:02:04,680
the past few days because it's 
about what you're willing to 

37
00:02:04,880 --> 00:02:07,760
kind of sacrifice. 
I think when I think back to 

38
00:02:08,039 --> 00:02:10,840
when we last spoke after 
Wimbledon, that was like the 

39
00:02:10,840 --> 00:02:15,680
absolute bonfire of the seeds. 
And there were so many upsets. 

40
00:02:15,760 --> 00:02:21,680
And it brought out some really 
rich new storylines and allowed 

41
00:02:21,680 --> 00:02:25,160
us to think about players maybe 
in ways positive and negative 

42
00:02:25,160 --> 00:02:29,200
that we hadn't thought about 
them before in the build up to 

43
00:02:29,800 --> 00:02:34,440
what was, you know, ultimately 
compared to these men's and 

44
00:02:34,440 --> 00:02:36,720
women's finals. 
I mean, obviously it was hard 

45
00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:40,800
for Sinner Alcaraz to match the 
French Open just before. 

46
00:02:41,080 --> 00:02:44,800
And the less we say about 
Triantek and and Nessimova, the 

47
00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:50,160
better. 
But the concentration of the top

48
00:02:50,160 --> 00:02:54,880
seeds all being exactly where 
the draw really wants them to be

49
00:02:54,960 --> 00:03:00,840
in those final rounds did make 
really compelling match ups. 

50
00:03:00,920 --> 00:03:05,400
But it did come at the expense 
of several days of us thinking, 

51
00:03:05,400 --> 00:03:08,240
you know, look at this 
incredible upset or, you know, 

52
00:03:08,240 --> 00:03:12,960
we're seeing a new side of a 
player maybe in the top 30 doing

53
00:03:12,960 --> 00:03:14,720
particularly well. 
At the start of the season, 

54
00:03:14,720 --> 00:03:17,560
there was there was such a 
scarcity of that. 

55
00:03:17,680 --> 00:03:22,880
And it's like, would I give up 
the final four days that we saw?

56
00:03:23,280 --> 00:03:25,920
Maybe not. 
But I'm ready for a break and 

57
00:03:25,920 --> 00:03:29,640
some upsets at the French Open. 
100%, yeah, I think. 

58
00:03:29,640 --> 00:03:31,280
But I think that's what makes 
tennis interesting. 

59
00:03:31,280 --> 00:03:32,720
Like it could go either way, 
right? 

60
00:03:32,880 --> 00:03:37,440
Do you think the last few days 
of the tournament, the semi 

61
00:03:37,440 --> 00:03:42,600
finals and the finals made-up 
for the first week and a half of

62
00:03:42,600 --> 00:03:45,000
the tournament was more boring I
would say. 

63
00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:49,520
I think definitely because on 
both men's and the women's 

64
00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:55,680
straws, it presented one or two 
enormous talking points that 

65
00:03:55,720 --> 00:04:02,240
almost well satisfy us for the 
rest of the season or even the 

66
00:04:02,240 --> 00:04:05,520
next few seasons. 
With the example of Sablanca, 

67
00:04:05,520 --> 00:04:12,040
such a consistent world #1 And 
you see that she you know, she 

68
00:04:12,040 --> 00:04:17,440
can be broken down and she can 
be outsmarted by a player who, 

69
00:04:17,440 --> 00:04:21,800
although they both share like in
like the most bombastic hitting,

70
00:04:22,040 --> 00:04:26,600
was able to be her exact 
opposite in terms of the game 

71
00:04:26,600 --> 00:04:29,760
plan and the coolness. 
And when she was able to take 

72
00:04:29,760 --> 00:04:34,000
advantage of of things that are 
normally positives for 

73
00:04:34,000 --> 00:04:38,600
Sabalenka, her energy, her 
emotions, her confidence, 

74
00:04:39,080 --> 00:04:43,640
Someone who reaches as many 
Grand Slam finals and wins as 

75
00:04:43,640 --> 00:04:48,320
many Masters as Sabalenka be 
really unpicked is, I think, 

76
00:04:48,560 --> 00:04:51,880
super interesting. 
I feel like like last year, 

77
00:04:51,880 --> 00:04:54,600
we're going to get multiple 
Grand Slam winners on the 

78
00:04:54,600 --> 00:04:56,640
winners women's side of the 
draw. 

79
00:04:56,800 --> 00:05:01,360
I think Sabalinka absolutely can
win a Grand Slam this year, but 

80
00:05:01,360 --> 00:05:04,760
I think she will be one of four 
women who do. 

81
00:05:05,520 --> 00:05:09,120
So that's the interesting thing 
for the women and for the men's.

82
00:05:09,120 --> 00:05:15,880
I feel like it would be really 
unfair to not talk about Alcaraz

83
00:05:15,880 --> 00:05:20,000
making history, but you know, 
the Djokovic of it all was a 

84
00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:24,320
huge sort of re understanding 
for me. 

85
00:05:24,680 --> 00:05:29,480
And when I was watching his semi
final against Sinner I was like,

86
00:05:29,560 --> 00:05:34,840
this is the best. 
I feel like I've seen him play 

87
00:05:34,840 --> 00:05:38,600
since he was winning sets in the
2023 Wimbledon final against 

88
00:05:38,600 --> 00:05:41,720
Alka as that like incredible 
epic. 

89
00:05:42,080 --> 00:05:48,680
So to have both of those huge 
new considerations that I hadn't

90
00:05:48,680 --> 00:05:53,600
really had at the front of mind 
before going into the semi 

91
00:05:53,600 --> 00:05:56,880
finals and finals is like it was
worth it. 

92
00:05:56,880 --> 00:05:59,480
I'll take it. 
Totally 100%. 

93
00:05:59,520 --> 00:06:03,880
When I was watching the semi 
final match, my sort of take 

94
00:06:03,880 --> 00:06:05,880
from it was like, wow, this is 
really good for tennis. 

95
00:06:05,880 --> 00:06:08,920
It adds a really interesting 
story to the tournament. 

96
00:06:08,920 --> 00:06:12,000
I think it was amazing. 
You know, no one counts them 

97
00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:13,960
out, but I don't think people 
were really. 

98
00:06:14,320 --> 00:06:18,200
Predicting that, especially 
given his route to the final he 

99
00:06:18,200 --> 00:06:23,480
definitely has, is so impressive
and has made his own luck in his

100
00:06:23,480 --> 00:06:25,880
career. 
But like he did get quite lucky 

101
00:06:26,480 --> 00:06:29,560
on the road to the final with 
the retirement and the 

102
00:06:29,560 --> 00:06:32,560
withdrawal. 
I feel like such a fool, but I 

103
00:06:32,560 --> 00:06:38,040
was almost like afraid that we 
were going to see a really 

104
00:06:38,280 --> 00:06:43,080
dispiriting but perhaps totally 
predictable defeat to Sinner. 

105
00:06:43,280 --> 00:06:46,720
Or I thought he was going to 
retire in the final and we had 

106
00:06:46,720 --> 00:06:52,520
worst case scenario for that. 
And to have played the sets that

107
00:06:52,520 --> 00:06:56,800
he did in both of those matches 
where he was at his height, it 

108
00:06:56,800 --> 00:07:00,080
becomes just the rudest thing to
have thought in the Intel world.

109
00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:02,040
Like the disrespect that I've 
shown. 

110
00:07:02,040 --> 00:07:05,080
I must scroll on my hands and 
knees it's so bad. 

111
00:07:05,640 --> 00:07:07,720
But it's insane. 
Well, I remember you texted me 

112
00:07:07,720 --> 00:07:11,520
because you were like after the 
Alka Zverev semi. 

113
00:07:11,960 --> 00:07:14,920
You're like, oh, did we just 
witness the most insane semi 

114
00:07:14,920 --> 00:07:16,360
final? 
It's going to be followed like 

115
00:07:16,360 --> 00:07:19,200
by the least interesting semi 
final. 

116
00:07:19,960 --> 00:07:22,240
And I felt the exact same way. 
I was like, oh, it's going to be

117
00:07:22,240 --> 00:07:25,800
like a demolition. 
But no, it ended up being like, 

118
00:07:25,800 --> 00:07:29,560
from what I've sort of been 
reading, like one of, if not the

119
00:07:29,600 --> 00:07:33,200
like most insane men's semis day
ever. 

120
00:07:33,480 --> 00:07:34,960
Thank God we're also not that 
old. 

121
00:07:35,040 --> 00:07:39,320
We don't remember that many. 
It was super compelling and it 

122
00:07:39,320 --> 00:07:49,440
was also a huge credit to how 
exciting the Grand Slam 5 set 

123
00:07:49,440 --> 00:07:53,800
format is. 
And you have these like drag out

124
00:07:53,800 --> 00:07:57,240
battles between Alcaraz and 
Zverev. 

125
00:07:57,240 --> 00:08:01,360
There is obviously quite a 
significant chasm in terms of a 

126
00:08:01,360 --> 00:08:04,760
ceiling. 
But in a Masters match, it's 

127
00:08:04,760 --> 00:08:07,680
like Alcaraz wipes the floor 
with him and they move on. 

128
00:08:08,200 --> 00:08:16,040
But the ability for Zverev to 
take advantage of his opponent's

129
00:08:16,040 --> 00:08:18,880
physical weakness, drag himself 
back into the match and allow 

130
00:08:18,880 --> 00:08:23,440
for a really punchy decider and,
you know, keeping perhaps in 

131
00:08:23,440 --> 00:08:29,000
vain hope alive just for a few 
more hours was super 

132
00:08:29,000 --> 00:08:34,880
exhilarating for the spectators.
Because it feels like suddenly 

133
00:08:34,880 --> 00:08:38,440
the chance is anyone's it's the 
person who is kind of the most 

134
00:08:38,440 --> 00:08:40,880
courageous on the day. 
And you think the the 

135
00:08:40,880 --> 00:08:44,760
physicality of A5 set match 
really allows for that because 

136
00:08:44,760 --> 00:08:48,800
you are just seeing the energy, 
the muscle conditioning just 

137
00:08:48,800 --> 00:08:52,080
drain out of these players. 
And in that first match, you 

138
00:08:52,080 --> 00:08:54,440
know, by the first set, it's 
fair of who is completely 

139
00:08:54,440 --> 00:08:57,200
incapacitated because he's the 
only one who's been playing for 

140
00:08:57,200 --> 00:09:01,680
the last hour and a half. 
But that physical aspect also 

141
00:09:01,880 --> 00:09:05,800
made it more dramatic in both of
the matches. 

142
00:09:05,800 --> 00:09:10,240
And that's something that I 
think Australia is always one of

143
00:09:10,240 --> 00:09:13,880
the most likely slams to bring 
that because of the elements 

144
00:09:13,880 --> 00:09:17,120
coming into play and because of 
the the extreme heat. 

145
00:09:17,120 --> 00:09:20,400
I'm not saying I want these 
players to be tortured for my 

146
00:09:20,400 --> 00:09:25,760
own enjoyment, but I do think it
adds another interesting wrinkle

147
00:09:25,760 --> 00:09:29,520
into the match up. 
And, you know, potentially that 

148
00:09:29,520 --> 00:09:34,040
is a major factor, particularly 
if you're facing Yannick Sinner.

149
00:09:34,200 --> 00:09:37,920
You know he is not someone who 
deals with difficult conditions 

150
00:09:37,920 --> 00:09:40,640
well. 
Which we saw earlier on in the 

151
00:09:40,640 --> 00:09:42,160
tournament. 
Exactly. 

152
00:09:42,160 --> 00:09:46,480
And if you're going up against, 
you know, tennis perfection and 

153
00:09:46,480 --> 00:09:50,000
that's actually something that 
you can wake up and you can 

154
00:09:50,000 --> 00:09:54,440
check the weather and be like, 
OK, this is it might kill me 35°

155
00:09:54,440 --> 00:09:57,360
or whatever, but it's definitely
going to be something that he's 

156
00:09:57,360 --> 00:10:02,240
going to hate as well. 
How can I take advantage of that

157
00:10:02,520 --> 00:10:06,640
to use it as like a weapon for 
myself? 

158
00:10:06,920 --> 00:10:11,960
So that physical dimension I 
think also really added to the 

159
00:10:11,960 --> 00:10:16,160
semi finals drama. 
Andrea and Tamara, what are your

160
00:10:16,160 --> 00:10:20,520
takes on medical timeouts for 
crap? 

161
00:10:20,720 --> 00:10:25,440
So I'm biased obviously, but 
apparently he threw up twice, 

162
00:10:25,760 --> 00:10:27,040
right? 
And so if they're worried about 

163
00:10:27,040 --> 00:10:29,680
a heat stroke, then he is 
allowed to take a medical 

164
00:10:29,680 --> 00:10:31,200
timeout. 
You mean Sinner? 

165
00:10:31,400 --> 00:10:32,920
No, sorry, I'm talking about 
Carlos in. 

166
00:10:32,920 --> 00:10:35,120
The semi final, Yeah, sorry. 
OK, yeah, for cramping. 

167
00:10:35,160 --> 00:10:37,120
OK, I didn't realize. 
Oh, it was. 

168
00:10:37,120 --> 00:10:41,080
It was post Puke Alcoraz, to 
quote our favorite tennis 

169
00:10:41,080 --> 00:10:43,640
podcast because we already give 
you credit where credit is due. 

170
00:10:44,920 --> 00:10:46,520
Yes. 
So obviously you're not allowed 

171
00:10:46,520 --> 00:10:49,440
to take a medical timeout for 
cramps, right? 

172
00:10:50,360 --> 00:10:53,480
And you know, he says he didn't 
know if they were, if, you know,

173
00:10:53,480 --> 00:10:54,920
if what he had was a cramp or 
not. 

174
00:10:54,920 --> 00:10:56,600
Whether that's true, I don't 
know. 

175
00:10:56,600 --> 00:11:00,880
But Carlos doesn't really like 
deploy gamesmanship in matches. 

176
00:11:00,960 --> 00:11:03,480
That's not his thing. 
I don't think so. 

177
00:11:03,560 --> 00:11:05,280
I believe him like freak. 
Out. 

178
00:11:05,280 --> 00:11:07,960
Freaked out. 
He was shouting at in German, 

179
00:11:08,040 --> 00:11:11,880
hard, like the tournament 
referee or whoever that was. 

180
00:11:11,960 --> 00:11:15,840
I was like, jeez, relax. 
Like there there's the argument 

181
00:11:15,840 --> 00:11:18,840
that they favour Alkaraz and 
Sinner. 

182
00:11:18,960 --> 00:11:21,440
I don't know if you guys have 
thoughts on that. 

183
00:11:21,560 --> 00:11:27,360
I think that when someone is a 
sort of charismatic and likeable

184
00:11:27,360 --> 00:11:30,880
a player on and off the court as
Alcaraz, he is someone who is 

185
00:11:30,880 --> 00:11:35,880
less likely to chew out a 
referee or, you know, not fess 

186
00:11:35,880 --> 00:11:38,440
up to a double bounce. 
He he's a good sport. 

187
00:11:38,880 --> 00:11:43,200
That being said, I think the 
cramp occupies a really grey 

188
00:11:43,200 --> 00:11:47,440
area. 
Cramp has a as a symptom of a 

189
00:11:47,440 --> 00:11:52,240
heat illness is treated at the 
discretion of the physio. 

190
00:11:52,520 --> 00:11:56,560
So that is above board and if 
you've been yakking into your 

191
00:11:56,560 --> 00:12:01,080
towel then that's a incredible 
like example of someone who is 

192
00:12:01,080 --> 00:12:08,160
suffering from dehydration. 
But I think there was some 

193
00:12:08,640 --> 00:12:14,600
question over he wanted the 
specific massage on the thigh 

194
00:12:14,640 --> 00:12:18,520
and he said in his press 
conference after I didn't know 

195
00:12:18,840 --> 00:12:23,400
if it was maybe a more severe 
injury in that particular area. 

196
00:12:23,400 --> 00:12:24,680
Right. 
I was like, oh, that's it. 

197
00:12:24,840 --> 00:12:28,480
He has a tear in his like 
hamstring or something, or his 

198
00:12:28,480 --> 00:12:30,800
quad. 
But then clearly it wasn't that.

199
00:12:30,880 --> 00:12:32,240
I do think he thought it was 
that. 

200
00:12:32,360 --> 00:12:35,680
I don't want to turn him into 
more devious character than he 

201
00:12:35,680 --> 00:12:39,520
might be, but I don't want to 
assume that he was being totally

202
00:12:39,520 --> 00:12:44,800
above board because I think 
players generally will look to 

203
00:12:45,080 --> 00:12:49,080
see what they can get. 
I'm 90% sure it's cramp, but if 

204
00:12:49,080 --> 00:12:52,960
I get this particular massage 
and you know, it actually is a 

205
00:12:52,960 --> 00:12:56,120
worse injury and I'm being 
checked out and they can sign 

206
00:12:56,120 --> 00:12:58,800
off on it, then fine. 
If I can get away with it, I 

207
00:12:58,800 --> 00:13:03,040
will. 
I think he was quite angry 

208
00:13:03,040 --> 00:13:06,280
during the final about what was 
happening with the closing of 

209
00:13:06,280 --> 00:13:09,280
the roof, which felt like a bit 
of a halfway house for me 

210
00:13:09,280 --> 00:13:12,520
because the roof was open about 
a, you know, centimetre. 

211
00:13:12,520 --> 00:13:16,840
And it's like, are you in or are
you out on this roof debacle and

212
00:13:17,240 --> 00:13:23,240
maybe pushing there and being 
like an injustice has happened 

213
00:13:23,240 --> 00:13:24,840
against me. 
It needs to be clarified. 

214
00:13:24,840 --> 00:13:28,600
This isn't very good. 
Maybe that gets the blood 

215
00:13:28,600 --> 00:13:32,880
pumping in a way, maybe thinking
I've got away with a little bit 

216
00:13:32,880 --> 00:13:36,560
of a massage here where it's not
strictly speaking what I'm 

217
00:13:36,560 --> 00:13:38,880
supposed to be doing. 
All of those things are things 

218
00:13:38,880 --> 00:13:42,360
that players are going to try 
and aim for, rather than being 

219
00:13:42,360 --> 00:13:46,440
like I'm going to exactly follow
the rules and maybe my opponent 

220
00:13:46,440 --> 00:13:49,000
isn't doing the same. 
I also just always have to crack

221
00:13:49,000 --> 00:13:54,720
up at the massage situation. 
I know like it's very. 

222
00:13:55,160 --> 00:13:58,080
In there, it's like voyeuristic.
I feel like I'm watching 

223
00:13:58,080 --> 00:14:00,560
something I shouldn't be 
watching and it's happening. 

224
00:14:01,200 --> 00:14:05,760
I'm like, look away. 
So that story did really well 

225
00:14:05,760 --> 00:14:10,840
for us on the website. 
That kind of oh, massage 

226
00:14:10,840 --> 00:14:13,760
cheating storm kind of way of of
selling it did really well. 

227
00:14:13,760 --> 00:14:17,320
So it went as the the kind of 
biggest story on the site. 

228
00:14:17,320 --> 00:14:20,840
And when that happens, you get a
little text kind of beneath it, 

229
00:14:20,840 --> 00:14:23,280
classic Daily Mail, sort of 
shouty capitals, usually some 

230
00:14:23,280 --> 00:14:25,960
kind of pun. 
And I loved the one my editor 

231
00:14:25,960 --> 00:14:29,880
put on it, which was, don't 
shoot the massager, like the 

232
00:14:29,880 --> 00:14:33,600
massager. 
And I was like, that is with a 

233
00:14:33,600 --> 00:14:36,840
picture of, like, Zverev 
screaming here and then the leg 

234
00:14:36,840 --> 00:14:40,000
being worked on there. 
And I was like, this is poetry. 

235
00:14:40,000 --> 00:14:42,520
This is news poetry. 
Yeah. 

236
00:14:42,520 --> 00:14:44,360
I mean, they always deliver. 
OK. 

237
00:14:44,360 --> 00:14:50,040
So just like back to Novak, do 
we think he's going to win 25 

238
00:14:51,120 --> 00:14:52,760
and what would it actually take 
now? 

239
00:14:53,160 --> 00:14:59,640
I feel like that was a pretty 
good chance and those kinds of 

240
00:14:59,640 --> 00:15:04,040
chances do not come around all 
the time. 

241
00:15:04,320 --> 00:15:11,000
I didn't necessarily think he 
was going to win 25 before and 

242
00:15:11,000 --> 00:15:13,040
then after. 
I also don't think he's going to

243
00:15:13,040 --> 00:15:15,400
win it, but for a for a 
different reason. 

244
00:15:15,680 --> 00:15:19,400
I was on Sunday, I was like he 
could and that felt good to 

245
00:15:19,400 --> 00:15:22,760
feel. 
But I think that it's hard for 

246
00:15:22,760 --> 00:15:27,280
him because he is so clearly 
head and shoulders above 

247
00:15:27,480 --> 00:15:32,040
basically everyone else out 
there except for Alcaraz and 

248
00:15:32,040 --> 00:15:35,880
Sinner. 
In terms of his body, his 

249
00:15:35,880 --> 00:15:40,800
lifestyle, what he wants to do 
at 38 versus what a 24 year old 

250
00:15:40,800 --> 00:15:43,800
wants to do. 
He doesn't want to play loads of

251
00:15:43,800 --> 00:15:47,920
tournaments. 
He will, I'm sure, consistently 

252
00:15:48,200 --> 00:15:51,280
turn up to Grand slams, the 
occasional Masters. 

253
00:15:51,280 --> 00:15:56,680
But I know he's such an outlier 
and, you know, with barely any 

254
00:15:56,680 --> 00:16:00,320
time on court compared to his 
opponents over the past two 

255
00:16:00,320 --> 00:16:04,680
weeks, he still managed to play 
incredible, you know, super 

256
00:16:04,680 --> 00:16:07,360
competitive tennis in the final 
was. 

257
00:16:07,560 --> 00:16:10,240
I was like, shocked. 
I was like, that's it, he's got 

258
00:16:10,240 --> 00:16:13,440
it, but he clearly can't sustain
the level anymore, which. 

259
00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:17,000
Yeah, and I think it's going to 
be really hard turning up 

260
00:16:17,000 --> 00:16:22,400
because he didn't play warm up 
tournaments for the Australian 

261
00:16:22,400 --> 00:16:26,160
Open. 
And normally he does it's, it's 

262
00:16:26,160 --> 00:16:31,640
unusual to go straight in, you 
know, really, really cold with 

263
00:16:31,680 --> 00:16:35,840
very few warm up tournaments. 
So how many times can you do 

264
00:16:35,840 --> 00:16:38,760
that and reach the final? 
He's still going to want to play

265
00:16:38,760 --> 00:16:41,360
the big tournaments. 
It's going to become harder and 

266
00:16:41,360 --> 00:16:46,280
harder to get through the 1st 
and second weeks of those 

267
00:16:46,280 --> 00:16:50,680
tournaments if you're not 
regularly playing, even if you 

268
00:16:50,720 --> 00:16:56,600
are the great Novak Djokovic. 
So it does put him in an awkward

269
00:16:56,600 --> 00:17:01,080
position where he's going to 
want to keep pushing for that 

270
00:17:01,720 --> 00:17:06,640
elusive 25, but it becomes 
harder. 

271
00:17:07,359 --> 00:17:10,400
It just becomes harder for him 
every week, I think. 

272
00:17:11,640 --> 00:17:15,240
Yeah, I, I agree. 
I also, I, I do think that he 

273
00:17:15,240 --> 00:17:18,720
believed that he could do it 
this time and that it was the 

274
00:17:18,720 --> 00:17:21,359
opportunity. 
I mean, we've gotten some hate 

275
00:17:21,359 --> 00:17:25,640
for our stance on Djokovic on 
this podcast already, like from 

276
00:17:25,640 --> 00:17:28,200
week 1. 
But anyways, and we've also said

277
00:17:28,200 --> 00:17:31,000
like, there's no doubt, like 
statistically he is the GOAT, 

278
00:17:31,080 --> 00:17:34,640
like whether you like it or not.
And all respect to him. 

279
00:17:34,760 --> 00:17:37,440
And I loved his speech. 
I mean, he also said he had a 

280
00:17:37,440 --> 00:17:38,920
winning speech and a losing 
speech. 

281
00:17:38,920 --> 00:17:41,040
And he was like, let me just get
the losing speech out. 

282
00:17:41,040 --> 00:17:44,160
So he clearly like, I mean, you 
obviously always go in thinking 

283
00:17:44,160 --> 00:17:47,320
you can do it and winning. 
But I, I do think that he 

284
00:17:47,320 --> 00:17:50,160
thought he could like, really 
bring this one home. 

285
00:17:50,280 --> 00:17:54,360
I was surprised he wasn't more 
upset when he lost. 

286
00:17:54,840 --> 00:17:58,200
I guess because I'm so used to 
seeing players be super, super 

287
00:17:58,200 --> 00:17:59,560
emotional. 
In my mind, I'm like, OK, this 

288
00:17:59,560 --> 00:18:03,000
is one of his last chances to 
win a Grand Slam. 

289
00:18:03,200 --> 00:18:06,280
He didn't seem that defeated. 
Or maybe it's because he doesn't

290
00:18:06,280 --> 00:18:08,520
think of this as, you know, one 
of his last opportunities. 

291
00:18:08,520 --> 00:18:11,520
He probably now, because he beat
Sinner in the semi finals, 

292
00:18:11,520 --> 00:18:14,440
thinks he can he can win. 
I don't I think that was his 

293
00:18:14,440 --> 00:18:16,240
first time beating Sinner in 
five sets. 

294
00:18:16,360 --> 00:18:20,080
I think so best of five. 
But yeah, I was like I was I was

295
00:18:20,080 --> 00:18:22,400
shocked that he wasn't more 
upset. 

296
00:18:22,400 --> 00:18:25,760
But I guess I think that shows 
that he probably does believe, 

297
00:18:25,840 --> 00:18:27,480
you know, he can win another 
one. 

298
00:18:27,480 --> 00:18:29,200
He can win the 25th this year, 
I'm sure. 

299
00:18:29,520 --> 00:18:33,560
OK, so we make a call. 
Is he winning it or is he not? 

300
00:18:33,880 --> 00:18:38,640
My call is not, but with a bit 
of sadness attached to it. 

301
00:18:39,440 --> 00:18:41,560
Yeah, I do feel bad. 
It must be tough because like to

302
00:18:41,560 --> 00:18:44,840
give up on that mission if 
that's what it comes to for him 

303
00:18:44,840 --> 00:18:48,080
it it's hard, but I also think 
not. 

304
00:18:49,000 --> 00:18:50,800
Yeah. 
I don't think he's given up. 

305
00:18:51,040 --> 00:18:53,240
No, but I don't think he's. 
Going to do it that. 

306
00:18:53,360 --> 00:18:54,800
Way, I think. 
I think Wimbledon. 

307
00:18:54,840 --> 00:18:57,640
Wimbledon is probably his best 
chance of doing it for sure. 

308
00:19:02,520 --> 00:19:06,400
OK, Should we talk about Carlos?
Because ultimately he is the 

309
00:19:06,400 --> 00:19:09,880
winner here and we love Carlos, 
all three of us too. 

310
00:19:10,280 --> 00:19:14,360
He completed the career slam, 
which is really impressive and 

311
00:19:14,360 --> 00:19:17,840
he was the is now the youngest 
person to ever do it and he did 

312
00:19:17,840 --> 00:19:23,640
it with Rafa in the crowd. 
Who was the person who was 

313
00:19:23,640 --> 00:19:27,000
holding that record? 
It's completely amazing and I 

314
00:19:27,000 --> 00:19:32,080
was doing some very basic maths 
which I don't think is 

315
00:19:32,800 --> 00:19:35,640
necessarily the way to track 
Grand Slams. 

316
00:19:35,640 --> 00:19:40,160
But at this sort of current 
trajectory, in terms of the time

317
00:19:40,160 --> 00:19:45,560
that he's actually spent playing
top level tennis, he matches 24 

318
00:19:45,800 --> 00:19:49,760
Grand Slams. 
By the time he's like 33, if he 

319
00:19:49,760 --> 00:19:56,120
stays fit and firing and who 
knows how long a career if we 

320
00:19:56,120 --> 00:20:00,560
are seeing with Djokovic, could 
this 38 year old grizzled 

321
00:20:00,560 --> 00:20:07,560
veteran when #25 in 10 years, I 
think we're going to be talking 

322
00:20:07,560 --> 00:20:09,880
about careers lasting even 
longer. 

323
00:20:09,880 --> 00:20:14,480
And there are going to be more 
top players and even players in 

324
00:20:14,480 --> 00:20:18,200
the Top 40 who is still in the 
mix a little bit older just 

325
00:20:18,200 --> 00:20:21,000
because of how athletes are 
treating their bodies. 

326
00:20:21,000 --> 00:20:25,720
So this is someone who could 
really shatter all records. 

327
00:20:25,800 --> 00:20:29,360
And I think what? 
Is crazy about that youngest 

328
00:20:29,400 --> 00:20:35,880
career slam when is he's so much
younger than Nadal and Nadal was

329
00:20:36,000 --> 00:20:41,640
freakishly young when he won it.
And for someone to have chopped 

330
00:20:41,640 --> 00:20:45,520
it even further, you just think 
how long is he going to have 

331
00:20:45,520 --> 00:20:49,520
that record? 
It's an insane record to have 

332
00:20:49,520 --> 00:20:52,200
made. 
I I think personally what it 

333
00:20:52,200 --> 00:20:58,520
comes down to, and I think this 
is applicable to any career, but

334
00:20:58,520 --> 00:21:02,680
if you really, really love what 
you do, it doesn't feel like 

335
00:21:02,680 --> 00:21:04,800
work. 
And like, I feel like he's just 

336
00:21:04,800 --> 00:21:07,120
like the embodiment of that. 
He looks like he's just having 

337
00:21:07,120 --> 00:21:10,240
fun all the time. 
Like he can laugh off a missed 

338
00:21:10,240 --> 00:21:13,240
shot, a missed opportunity. 
And he doesn't like take 

339
00:21:13,240 --> 00:21:16,840
everything so seriously. 
And like, to me, I think that's 

340
00:21:16,840 --> 00:21:18,520
what it is. 
You have to like live, breathe 

341
00:21:18,520 --> 00:21:19,960
and just really love what you 
do. 

342
00:21:20,360 --> 00:21:23,080
Sort of like Roger as well. 
He never really looked like too 

343
00:21:23,080 --> 00:21:25,760
fatigued after all, like sweaty.
I don't know. 

344
00:21:25,760 --> 00:21:28,520
I, I think there's definitely a 
part of that to it. 

345
00:21:28,520 --> 00:21:32,360
I mean, he obviously also has a 
crazy amount of talent and then 

346
00:21:32,360 --> 00:21:36,080
also dedication. 
But that's sort of what I think 

347
00:21:36,080 --> 00:21:37,920
it kind of comes down to. 
I don't know. 

348
00:21:38,040 --> 00:21:44,640
I think if anyone in any field 
has that kind of ability to keep

349
00:21:44,640 --> 00:21:51,680
those energy levels and project 
even the illusion of enjoyment 

350
00:21:51,720 --> 00:21:56,760
and passion and be able to, you 
know, smile their way through 

351
00:21:56,760 --> 00:22:03,120
things, they are going to be 
able to draw upon that in more 

352
00:22:03,120 --> 00:22:11,200
challenging times. 
His five set record is 15151. 

353
00:22:11,200 --> 00:22:16,480
And it's and it's Mateo. 
It's Mateo, Yes, yes, the. 

354
00:22:16,480 --> 00:22:19,440
Hammer will return in 20. 26 the
hammer. 

355
00:22:19,440 --> 00:22:21,800
Let's go with the clap. 
Come on, Matteo. 

356
00:22:22,560 --> 00:22:28,920
And so that I think is part of 
the reason there are a lot of 

357
00:22:28,920 --> 00:22:35,440
reasons why he's been able to 
absolutely make a long 5 setter 

358
00:22:35,440 --> 00:22:39,280
and something another thing that
Cinna has not yet added to his 

359
00:22:39,280 --> 00:22:40,960
game. 
It's really these like 

360
00:22:41,040 --> 00:22:46,560
incredibly long drag out contest
he is challenged by. 

361
00:22:47,600 --> 00:22:52,200
But if you are down and out back
end of the fourth set really 

362
00:22:52,200 --> 00:22:59,760
struggling and you are able to 
still feel genuine enjoyment in 

363
00:22:59,760 --> 00:23:04,520
your shot making and you can 
draw upon the crowd and you can 

364
00:23:04,520 --> 00:23:07,920
smile your way through it. 
That has got to be helpful at 

365
00:23:08,040 --> 00:23:10,400
digging you out and getting you 
over the finish line. 

366
00:23:10,400 --> 00:23:14,360
So in terms of things that are 
good for tennis, he is really 

367
00:23:14,360 --> 00:23:18,840
good for tennis in a way that I 
think other players who would be

368
00:23:18,840 --> 00:23:23,960
as consistent as him might be. 
But I don't think anyone is 

369
00:23:25,160 --> 00:23:32,040
upset to see him at another 
Grand Slam because he plays such

370
00:23:32,040 --> 00:23:38,760
an inventive and varied game 
that is just super interesting 

371
00:23:38,760 --> 00:23:41,320
to watch. 
The absolute bag of tricks and 

372
00:23:41,320 --> 00:23:45,440
the drop shot and the forehand's
incredible and the serving gets 

373
00:23:45,440 --> 00:23:48,560
better and better. 
And you think this is someone 

374
00:23:48,560 --> 00:23:52,720
who's so watchable? 
It's not just about results, 

375
00:23:52,720 --> 00:23:57,680
It's really charismatic, Dennis.
So do we think that Carlos is 

376
00:23:57,680 --> 00:24:00,760
going to surpass Tchaikovich 25 
slams? 

377
00:24:02,120 --> 00:24:06,040
For sure. 
I think barring like a major 

378
00:24:06,040 --> 00:24:12,840
injury, because Djokovic has had
a comparatively injury free 

379
00:24:12,960 --> 00:24:19,040
career compared to top level 
athletes in any sport and 

380
00:24:19,040 --> 00:24:24,360
obviously that would be super 
disruptive, but I don't know. 

381
00:24:25,160 --> 00:24:28,680
I'm also I'm so bad when it 
comes to recency bias. 

382
00:24:28,840 --> 00:24:31,520
I might. 
He's never going to lose again. 

383
00:24:32,240 --> 00:24:35,320
I think we all are because he's 
just like what do you like Pull 

384
00:24:35,320 --> 00:24:39,840
has pulled off in like the last 
2 1/2 years is crazy. 

385
00:24:40,760 --> 00:24:44,640
But as you say, I think barring 
any injury, any major. 

386
00:24:44,640 --> 00:24:46,840
He's there. 
He's there, but I think he can 

387
00:24:46,840 --> 00:24:50,880
get to 30. 
I Yeah. 

388
00:24:50,880 --> 00:24:53,080
I'm sorry I say really crazy 
shit, but like I. 

389
00:24:53,080 --> 00:24:54,640
We're we're jinxing him right 
now. 

390
00:24:54,640 --> 00:24:56,600
We need to. 
Knock on away manifesting for 

391
00:24:56,600 --> 00:25:01,520
him it's all like very positive.
How many does Serena have? 

392
00:25:01,800 --> 00:25:04,600
Serena has 20. 
How many does Margaret Court? 

393
00:25:04,600 --> 00:25:06,480
I mean, 24. 
Count her 24. 

394
00:25:06,600 --> 00:25:07,600
OK. 
Oh, wow. 

395
00:25:07,600 --> 00:25:08,280
OK. 
Yeah, they're. 

396
00:25:08,280 --> 00:25:11,240
All on 24. 
I need to look into the 

397
00:25:11,240 --> 00:25:15,520
specifics of this, but my, I was
talking to my boyfriend, he was 

398
00:25:15,520 --> 00:25:19,360
like, I think 24 and one set 
puts him ahead of Margaret 

399
00:25:19,360 --> 00:25:21,720
Court. 
And I was like, I'm not sure how

400
00:25:21,800 --> 00:25:25,120
that really works. 
But I think Djokovic would be 

401
00:25:25,120 --> 00:25:29,520
thrilled to know that you have 
officially named him the GOAT 

402
00:25:29,520 --> 00:25:34,600
for that one set that. 
He PSA, Novak, PSA. 

403
00:25:34,640 --> 00:25:38,760
I'm dead. 
That is very good point. 

404
00:25:38,760 --> 00:25:41,520
And yeah, going back to Carlos, 
do we think he's going to 

405
00:25:42,240 --> 00:25:44,080
complete the Calendar Slam this 
year? 

406
00:25:44,600 --> 00:25:48,760
Calendar Slam is winning all 
four slams in one year, just for

407
00:25:48,760 --> 00:25:53,440
those who don't know. 
I think it's really hard to 

408
00:25:53,960 --> 00:25:59,760
imagine and I don't doubt that. 
And defeat to Djokovic will have

409
00:25:59,760 --> 00:26:02,680
given Sina serious food for 
thought and. 

410
00:26:03,960 --> 00:26:06,600
That's probably Sina's out here 
scheming like. 

411
00:26:06,760 --> 00:26:11,600
He's going to be taking that out
on opponents from Dubai to Miami

412
00:26:11,680 --> 00:26:15,040
to Rome. 
Is there going to be just shells

413
00:26:15,040 --> 00:26:19,560
of players left crying on the 
courts as he works through being

414
00:26:19,560 --> 00:26:21,840
beaten by a 98? 
Year old in his press 

415
00:26:21,840 --> 00:26:23,960
conference. 
I was like damn. 

416
00:26:24,280 --> 00:26:26,120
I mean, that was a big loss for 
him, yeah. 

417
00:26:27,000 --> 00:26:28,240
And I get it. 
Very big. 

418
00:26:28,240 --> 00:26:29,720
Loss. 
So do we think they're going to 

419
00:26:29,720 --> 00:26:32,360
split the Slams again? 
Well, maybe Djokovic wins 

420
00:26:32,360 --> 00:26:33,560
Wimbledon. 
I don't know. 

421
00:26:33,560 --> 00:26:38,160
I think they are going to split 
the Slams again unless Djokovic 

422
00:26:38,160 --> 00:26:44,880
wins Wimbledon, just because 
everyone else does look so far 

423
00:26:44,880 --> 00:26:47,320
away from being able to. 
The gap is. 

424
00:26:47,320 --> 00:26:52,560
Crazy. 
The gap is sort of making me sad

425
00:26:52,720 --> 00:26:59,440
when I compare it to the top 10 
on the women's side. 

426
00:26:59,600 --> 00:27:03,240
And I think it will be good in 
the long run that we have had 

427
00:27:03,360 --> 00:27:07,240
just one break from a final 
between Alcaraz and Sinner. 

428
00:27:07,240 --> 00:27:11,240
You'll just wanted a bit more. 
And This is why we're all crying

429
00:27:11,240 --> 00:27:14,600
out for the third man. 
Who is he going to be? 

430
00:27:14,600 --> 00:27:17,360
It's the old third man has come 
back. 

431
00:27:17,360 --> 00:27:21,400
He's the he's tennis's perennial
third man. 

432
00:27:21,400 --> 00:27:24,440
Is he going to be the third man 
in 10 years like he joked about?

433
00:27:25,280 --> 00:27:31,120
But we do need a a proper third 
man to consistently take, you 

434
00:27:31,120 --> 00:27:36,960
know, one of them out so that we
can have some kind of challenge.

435
00:27:37,440 --> 00:27:43,840
And I think that without that 
the the ominous dud slam that we

436
00:27:43,840 --> 00:27:47,560
experienced before the semi 
finals is going to be a more 

437
00:27:47,560 --> 00:27:51,000
regular thing because we are 
just going to be like when is it

438
00:27:51,000 --> 00:27:53,080
time for Sinner and Akaras to 
play again? 

439
00:27:53,200 --> 00:27:54,880
Which? 
Like Andrea said, is not 

440
00:27:54,880 --> 00:27:58,040
necessarily good for the sport. 
Like it's a bit of variation. 

441
00:27:58,040 --> 00:28:01,040
No, we need more intrigue. 
Even when the big, you know, big

442
00:28:01,040 --> 00:28:05,040
three were around, at least you 
know Vavrinka could beat them at

443
00:28:05,040 --> 00:28:06,360
any point. 
I feel like there was way more 

444
00:28:06,360 --> 00:28:09,480
competition for sure, despite 
all of them for the most part 

445
00:28:09,480 --> 00:28:12,240
dominating Chilich. 
When a slam, you know it's this 

446
00:28:12,240 --> 00:28:14,960
level of domination is a bit 
boring. 

447
00:28:15,080 --> 00:28:17,600
Yeah, we're going to need 
everyone to step it up, please. 

448
00:28:17,600 --> 00:28:20,240
Rest of the field, Yeah, Here, 
us. 

449
00:28:21,040 --> 00:28:25,200
Maddie, this is who we're 
appealing to you directly, 

450
00:28:25,680 --> 00:28:28,560
please. 
I wrote something just before 

451
00:28:28,640 --> 00:28:33,800
the Australian Open being like, 
if we can't have a true like 

452
00:28:33,800 --> 00:28:37,640
challenger, can we have some 
sort of like holy fool pretender

453
00:28:37,640 --> 00:28:43,960
who can just come and disrupt 
and give us something fun and 

454
00:28:43,960 --> 00:28:47,040
unexpected? 
And obviously I was like, that 

455
00:28:47,040 --> 00:28:51,240
needs to be Danielle and Bublik.
They are the Oh my. 

456
00:28:51,320 --> 00:28:55,000
God, we love them. 
And I think both of them 

457
00:28:55,960 --> 00:29:00,840
obviously back end of the year 
and that's where Bublik has 

458
00:29:01,200 --> 00:29:04,000
built up a load of points at 
Wimbledon. 

459
00:29:04,000 --> 00:29:09,360
He has nothing to defend. 
There are still chances for him 

460
00:29:09,360 --> 00:29:14,880
to sort of go in and and 
disrupt, I feel, and I would 

461
00:29:14,880 --> 00:29:21,160
love for him and Medvedev to 
just be sprinkling discontent 

462
00:29:21,440 --> 00:29:26,120
amongst the top ten players 
because even though they are 

463
00:29:26,280 --> 00:29:30,560
both very talented, they're both
in different ways surprise 

464
00:29:30,560 --> 00:29:33,520
packages. 
And I think Medvedev's 2025 was 

465
00:29:33,520 --> 00:29:36,360
very rough. 
I think he does deserve a little

466
00:29:36,360 --> 00:29:39,840
bit of a comeback in 2020. 6 And
he's just so entertaining. 

467
00:29:40,560 --> 00:29:43,120
You need like the clown sort of 
troll energy. 

468
00:29:44,160 --> 00:29:50,040
I briefly lost it with him after
the US Open because I was like, 

469
00:29:50,120 --> 00:29:51,720
too far. 
You've taken it too far. 

470
00:29:52,040 --> 00:29:56,120
You've terrorized A Frenchman. 
All he did was be better than 

471
00:29:56,120 --> 00:29:58,080
you. 
You've terrorized an umpire. 

472
00:29:58,120 --> 00:30:01,760
You know, you've used Riley and 
Palka as a useful source. 

473
00:30:01,760 --> 00:30:04,080
I don't think that's helping. 
That's not good for tennis. 

474
00:30:04,760 --> 00:30:09,120
But since then I had a little 
pause and I I am unfortunately 

475
00:30:09,120 --> 00:30:13,000
back on the Med of a dev. 
Yeah, I mean, he is just too 

476
00:30:13,000 --> 00:30:15,680
humor, honestly. 
It's so good. 

477
00:30:16,760 --> 00:30:23,080
Should we discuss the women's 
final and just the result there 

478
00:30:23,080 --> 00:30:27,160
and that whole story? 
Because there's a lot there 

479
00:30:27,400 --> 00:30:30,080
which I don't know. 
We don't want to get too deep on

480
00:30:30,080 --> 00:30:35,840
it because it's quite heavy and 
this is meant to be fun, but 

481
00:30:36,000 --> 00:30:39,800
also it's very, very important. 
Also, Congrats, first of all, to

482
00:30:40,600 --> 00:30:42,280
Elena Rabackina. 
She is. 

483
00:30:42,280 --> 00:30:50,040
So talented and I think it was a
bit of a an aberration that she 

484
00:30:50,040 --> 00:30:53,720
hadn't won a Slam since she won 
Wimbledon. 

485
00:30:54,840 --> 00:31:00,280
But it's something that I want 
to think a bit more about and 

486
00:31:00,400 --> 00:31:05,560
maybe write about is both of her
experiences winning a Grand Slam

487
00:31:05,560 --> 00:31:09,680
have kind of she's been victim 
to like off court stuff as well.

488
00:31:09,680 --> 00:31:14,320
So for 2022, that was all of the
Russian stuff and the 

489
00:31:14,320 --> 00:31:16,200
Belarusians and Russians not 
playing. 

490
00:31:16,200 --> 00:31:20,680
And was she going to be used as 
a political pawn as if someone 

491
00:31:20,680 --> 00:31:23,440
can control if they're used as a
political pawn, they are 

492
00:31:23,440 --> 00:31:25,640
literally a pawn in that 
scenario. 

493
00:31:26,720 --> 00:31:34,360
And then with this win, it was a
year on from her coach being 

494
00:31:34,720 --> 00:31:39,000
banned from the sport. 
It was the similar time of the 

495
00:31:39,000 --> 00:31:44,360
year and the Australian Open 
offers a prize for coaches. 

496
00:31:44,360 --> 00:31:49,120
So whereas he had been 
ostracized last year, this year 

497
00:31:49,960 --> 00:31:54,520
he is literally being applauded 
by the stadium and collecting a 

498
00:31:54,520 --> 00:31:56,560
plate. 
And that's just like almost a 

499
00:31:56,560 --> 00:32:03,760
comedic contrast between where 
he is in, I guess, kind of 

500
00:32:03,760 --> 00:32:08,760
public consciousness. 
It's a challenging thing for the

501
00:32:09,280 --> 00:32:15,000
sport and fans to kind of 
grapple with because Rebecca has

502
00:32:15,040 --> 00:32:20,680
made it really clear that she is
a really unhappy with the WTA 

503
00:32:20,680 --> 00:32:27,120
investigation into claims that 
he was displaying abusive 

504
00:32:27,120 --> 00:32:30,520
behaviour towards her. 
And she's been really, really 

505
00:32:30,520 --> 00:32:32,880
angry about that. 
You know, she won the WTA 

506
00:32:32,880 --> 00:32:38,720
Finals, but there was a photo op
and she shunned the possibility 

507
00:32:38,720 --> 00:32:42,640
of posing with the CEO. 
And, you know, it's not a happy 

508
00:32:42,640 --> 00:32:46,200
relationship that she has with 
her own tour at the moment. 

509
00:32:46,600 --> 00:32:53,200
And that is a bit of a challenge
for the sport and for the fans 

510
00:32:53,200 --> 00:32:57,080
as well, because you you want to
believe her that she's happy and

511
00:32:57,080 --> 00:33:00,600
she's certainly playing, you 
know, the best tennis of her 

512
00:33:00,920 --> 00:33:03,160
career if she's won another 
Grand Slam. 

513
00:33:03,160 --> 00:33:08,160
But, you know, they were very 
serious allegations from a lot 

514
00:33:08,160 --> 00:33:11,080
of different sources. 
And you kind of think, well, 

515
00:33:11,080 --> 00:33:14,200
that's really hard to imagine 
too. 

516
00:33:14,680 --> 00:33:19,800
I feel like last time I was on 
the podcast, we talked about the

517
00:33:20,320 --> 00:33:25,960
fan account that people think is
her coach, Stefano Bukov, just 

518
00:33:25,960 --> 00:33:28,800
pretending to be a fan since her
win. 

519
00:33:28,800 --> 00:33:32,120
Obviously there is a lot of 
congratulatory content geared 

520
00:33:32,120 --> 00:33:34,960
towards her, but there's a lot 
of like, can't believe people 

521
00:33:34,960 --> 00:33:37,840
said Bukov was a bad coach. 
And I'm like, it is very 

522
00:33:37,840 --> 00:33:41,480
interesting. 
He's so invested in a coach. 

523
00:33:41,480 --> 00:33:48,360
It's very rare that coaches do 
have such vocal fans, but not 

524
00:33:48,400 --> 00:33:50,760
just because I'm not a I'm not a
master tactician. 

525
00:33:50,760 --> 00:33:54,760
So maybe This is why it doesn't 
spring to mind for me to lay all

526
00:33:54,760 --> 00:33:56,480
of the praise at the feet of the
coach. 

527
00:33:56,480 --> 00:33:58,280
But a? 
100%. 

528
00:33:58,280 --> 00:34:01,120
Yeah, No, I think you're right 
to be a little suspicious of 

529
00:34:01,120 --> 00:34:03,320
that. 
Be like in tennis, the coaches 

530
00:34:03,320 --> 00:34:06,800
are not not a big thing at all, 
no. 

531
00:34:06,920 --> 00:34:09,159
It was a great final, I thought 
it was. 

532
00:34:09,239 --> 00:34:12,239
And she was, she was a. 
Genius with how she kind of 

533
00:34:12,239 --> 00:34:13,760
worked out. 
She was. 

534
00:34:13,760 --> 00:34:17,600
How she was going to play. 
I think also just like her 

535
00:34:17,600 --> 00:34:20,880
celebration or non. 
Yeah, her non celebration is 

536
00:34:20,880 --> 00:34:23,800
wild to me, but she's always 
been that way. 

537
00:34:23,800 --> 00:34:27,000
She has, Yeah, I don't think so.
It's not just this tournament. 

538
00:34:27,000 --> 00:34:30,080
It's also an interesting 
contrast to Sabalenka because if

539
00:34:30,120 --> 00:34:34,199
Sabalenka had won, it would have
been the classic, you know, 

540
00:34:34,199 --> 00:34:37,880
dramatic moment, which I mean, 
we're here for Sabalenka. 

541
00:34:37,960 --> 00:34:40,760
We like her, but like I did, she
cracks me up as well. 

542
00:34:40,760 --> 00:34:43,880
Like, I mean, obviously it was 
really sad for her not to win, 

543
00:34:43,880 --> 00:34:46,800
but I do think Rebecca, 
obviously she totally like what 

544
00:34:46,800 --> 00:34:49,360
you said, like so impressive 
that she went and just took it 

545
00:34:49,639 --> 00:34:53,440
after like losing the second set
and then just like locking in in

546
00:34:53,440 --> 00:34:56,360
the third. 
But Sabalenka at the end, like, 

547
00:34:56,360 --> 00:35:00,320
you know, they they had like the
non celebration of Rebecca and 

548
00:35:00,320 --> 00:35:03,160
then they like cut to Sabalenka 
just like under her towel and I 

549
00:35:03,160 --> 00:35:06,480
just it cracked me up. 
But like sad for her, but it it 

550
00:35:06,480 --> 00:35:08,320
just cracked me up. 
She just looked like a ghost and

551
00:35:08,320 --> 00:35:11,440
I was just like and like clearly
like she just obviously players 

552
00:35:11,440 --> 00:35:13,080
do that a lot. 
They hide behind their towels, 

553
00:35:13,080 --> 00:35:15,320
but it's just the way the 
contrast I was. 

554
00:35:15,320 --> 00:35:18,160
Just like the contrast. 
Opposite players, opposite 

555
00:35:18,160 --> 00:35:21,200
personalities, Very, very 
different. 

556
00:35:21,560 --> 00:35:26,800
But then she cried in her press 
conference, so she does show 

557
00:35:26,920 --> 00:35:29,080
some emotion. 
Yeah, I think she's just doing a

558
00:35:29,080 --> 00:35:31,120
big introvert. 
Yeah, yeah, yeah. 

559
00:35:31,120 --> 00:35:32,600
And it's. 
Probably, you know, it takes a 

560
00:35:32,600 --> 00:35:35,160
while for the emotions to come 
out, but. 

561
00:35:35,560 --> 00:35:37,960
Totally. 
And I think if you're capable of

562
00:35:37,960 --> 00:35:41,240
doing that on court and using it
as like a real position of 

563
00:35:41,240 --> 00:35:43,960
strength to be like, I'm going 
to keep cool, I'm going to be 

564
00:35:43,960 --> 00:35:45,520
composed. 
You're right. 

565
00:35:45,520 --> 00:35:48,040
It must take actually quite a 
long time if you're doing it as 

566
00:35:48,040 --> 00:35:52,480
such a big moment in such an 
intense way for that to kind of 

567
00:35:52,480 --> 00:35:56,200
break down and the kind of 
shoulders to slump even a little

568
00:35:56,200 --> 00:35:59,360
bit. 
I cannot imagine being able to 

569
00:35:59,560 --> 00:36:05,000
be so level and just like. 
Yeah, crazy. 

570
00:36:05,480 --> 00:36:08,440
OK, so another storyline that 
sort of came to light over the 

571
00:36:08,440 --> 00:36:12,760
weekend was that Craig Tiley, 
tournament director of the 

572
00:36:12,760 --> 00:36:16,240
Australian Open, who he is 
rumoured to be leaving the 

573
00:36:16,240 --> 00:36:19,040
Australian Open and maybe be 
going to USTA. 

574
00:36:19,480 --> 00:36:22,240
So maybe it was just a bit of a 
like mic drop moment. 

575
00:36:22,240 --> 00:36:27,320
Like he floated a few ideas for 
the future of the tournament 

576
00:36:27,320 --> 00:36:31,280
rather over the weekend and like
5 sets for women from 

577
00:36:31,280 --> 00:36:34,640
quarterfinals stage onwards was 
one of them. 

578
00:36:35,400 --> 00:36:38,280
What are you guys as thoughts on
five sets for women? 

579
00:36:41,640 --> 00:36:48,240
OK, silence, silence, silence. 
OK, maybe that is the answer and

580
00:36:48,240 --> 00:36:49,320
we don't even need to talk about
it. 

581
00:36:50,160 --> 00:36:53,640
I do. 
I do love that he has left that 

582
00:36:53,640 --> 00:36:58,040
for Yeah, he's like, yeah, he's.
Just like, bye, I'm going to 

583
00:36:58,040 --> 00:37:00,280
drop a bomb and you guys deal 
with it. 

584
00:37:00,280 --> 00:37:04,200
And it's like that is a very 
worthwhile idea to explore, but 

585
00:37:04,200 --> 00:37:06,800
the headache that is going 
through the player consultations

586
00:37:06,800 --> 00:37:08,760
for that one, someone else can 
handle that. 

587
00:37:09,200 --> 00:37:11,160
That's that's absolutely fine by
him. 

588
00:37:11,520 --> 00:37:15,440
I think if it's going to happen,
and I wouldn't be against it 

589
00:37:15,440 --> 00:37:21,000
happening in later stages, but I
think it becomes much more 

590
00:37:21,000 --> 00:37:26,520
valuable if that is the position
and format taken up by all of 

591
00:37:26,520 --> 00:37:28,560
the Grand Slams. 
No, it has to be. 

592
00:37:29,240 --> 00:37:32,480
Denigration maybe if the other 
slams. 

593
00:37:32,600 --> 00:37:35,880
Something I was thinking about 
the other day was, you know, the

594
00:37:35,880 --> 00:37:40,880
kind of transformation of the US
Open mixed double S into much 

595
00:37:40,880 --> 00:37:44,560
more of a kind of, you know, 
star-studded match up, but maybe

596
00:37:44,560 --> 00:37:48,400
slightly less prestigious, 
whatever that means for, you 

597
00:37:48,400 --> 00:37:52,200
know, mixed double S Journeyman,
if they exist at Grand Slams. 

598
00:37:52,200 --> 00:37:56,440
And I was thinking even less of 
the Australian Open mixed double

599
00:37:56,440 --> 00:37:59,880
s than I did before because I'm 
thinking about the US Open and 

600
00:37:59,880 --> 00:38:03,600
how it's kind of a bit, it's, 
you know, borderline exhibition.

601
00:38:03,600 --> 00:38:07,040
And I think this is what happens
if they're all kind of schisms 

602
00:38:07,040 --> 00:38:11,240
in how like Grand Slam, you 
know, main events rather than 

603
00:38:11,240 --> 00:38:14,040
like fan events or exhibitions 
before operate. 

604
00:38:14,480 --> 00:38:18,760
You're going to start thinking, 
OK, well, maybe this part 

605
00:38:18,760 --> 00:38:22,760
doesn't matter as much, or like 
what makes this a real Grand 

606
00:38:22,760 --> 00:38:27,080
Slam title because I work way 
harder for what I want in 

607
00:38:27,200 --> 00:38:31,880
Australia than what I'm doing in
in France. 

608
00:38:32,080 --> 00:38:34,080
I agree. 
I think it would have to be like

609
00:38:34,240 --> 00:38:36,840
a clean sweep across the board 
if they're all like they will 

610
00:38:36,840 --> 00:38:39,280
have to do it or none of them do
it because otherwise it. 

611
00:38:39,520 --> 00:38:41,560
Yeah, like exactly what you just
said. 

612
00:38:41,960 --> 00:38:43,000
Yeah. 
Andre, what do you think? 

613
00:38:43,880 --> 00:38:46,480
I, you know, obviously I'm not a
player, a professional player by

614
00:38:46,480 --> 00:38:50,200
any means, but I do think it 
would be kind of weird to play 

615
00:38:50,200 --> 00:38:53,080
best of three up until the 
quarterfinals. 

616
00:38:53,120 --> 00:38:57,520
I think momentum is everything. 
And yeah, I, I can imagine it 

617
00:38:57,520 --> 00:39:01,720
being a little bit jarring, like
preparation would be different 

618
00:39:01,720 --> 00:39:04,000
suddenly, you know? 
Yeah, it's, it's a, it's a 

619
00:39:04,000 --> 00:39:06,760
different, it's a very different
game to be playing best of five 

620
00:39:06,760 --> 00:39:09,000
versus best of three. 
So I don't know. 

621
00:39:09,000 --> 00:39:11,880
I'd be interested to hear what 
players think about that. 

622
00:39:12,240 --> 00:39:17,440
I don't know why I was when 
after she went out so early last

623
00:39:17,440 --> 00:39:21,160
year at Wimbledon, I was in a 
the press conference for Jessica

624
00:39:21,160 --> 00:39:24,000
Pegula and someone asked her 
about 5 sets for women. 

625
00:39:24,520 --> 00:39:28,160
She was so funny about it. 
She was like, I think the men 

626
00:39:28,160 --> 00:39:30,800
should play three sets. 
I don't know what you're talking

627
00:39:30,800 --> 00:39:32,840
about. 
You know, they have too much 

628
00:39:32,840 --> 00:39:36,400
time over 5 sets. 
They can mess around. 

629
00:39:36,640 --> 00:39:40,520
There's far less jeopardy. 
Three sets is far more exciting 

630
00:39:40,520 --> 00:39:42,880
because you have to get it done 
quicker. 

631
00:39:42,880 --> 00:39:46,440
You don't have this time. 
And I feel like the reputation 

632
00:39:46,440 --> 00:39:49,520
of Alcaraz, you know, having his
five set record and being able 

633
00:39:49,520 --> 00:39:52,600
to just kind of think about 
whatever, where am I going for 

634
00:39:52,600 --> 00:39:57,320
dinner in sets two and four and 
not having to deliver the hammer

635
00:39:57,320 --> 00:40:00,840
blow. 
Is she she she made a very kind 

636
00:40:00,840 --> 00:40:06,840
of 21st century tech comment 
where she was like, we want to 

637
00:40:06,840 --> 00:40:09,560
try and get people into tennis. 
It's too long and too boring. 

638
00:40:09,560 --> 00:40:11,080
I don't really watch 5 set 
tennis. 

639
00:40:11,080 --> 00:40:15,200
And I was like, that's crazy. 
I think it's absolutely insane 

640
00:40:15,440 --> 00:40:18,280
as well. 
Like I love watching 5 setters. 

641
00:40:19,080 --> 00:40:23,960
A good a good five setter is 
incredible. 

642
00:40:24,720 --> 00:40:27,200
But the general public thinks 
it's too long. 

643
00:40:27,520 --> 00:40:29,400
But I don't know. 
Do you have to just be like a 

644
00:40:29,400 --> 00:40:31,400
die hard tennis fan to enjoy 
five sets? 

645
00:40:31,400 --> 00:40:36,760
Like like, I don't know. 
I think the men's semifinals 

646
00:40:36,760 --> 00:40:43,560
day, Alcora Sinner, Roan Garros,
these are incredible because 

647
00:40:43,560 --> 00:40:47,160
they and they are not your 
average 5 setters. 

648
00:40:47,560 --> 00:40:51,400
Just the possibility that they 
can exist is maybe worth sitting

649
00:40:51,400 --> 00:40:56,040
through five sets of Medford dev
against Benjamin Bonzi, which 

650
00:40:56,040 --> 00:41:00,320
I'm sure you know, save for 6 
minutes screaming at the umpire 

651
00:41:00,320 --> 00:41:03,960
is probably not the most 
scintillating clash of all time.

652
00:41:04,320 --> 00:41:07,640
But I think there would be a lot
of people who are like, I don't 

653
00:41:07,640 --> 00:41:11,400
think it is worth it waiting 
around for maybe 3 or 4 * a 

654
00:41:11,400 --> 00:41:15,840
year, an epic match when 
actually it's prolonging two 

655
00:41:15,840 --> 00:41:19,480
players who maybe should have 
just got it done a little 

656
00:41:19,480 --> 00:41:26,400
earlier. 
The Hilo. 

657
00:41:26,400 --> 00:41:31,240
I love a good WAG story. 
Did you see the story of Morgan 

658
00:41:31,240 --> 00:41:34,440
Riddle, Taylor Fritz's 
girlfriend, out earning him in 

659
00:41:34,440 --> 00:41:37,480
the Australian Open? 
She's an influencer. 

660
00:41:37,480 --> 00:41:40,040
It's just, yeah, it's wild. 
It's wild. 

661
00:41:40,840 --> 00:41:46,240
I thought that was so 
fascinating because I've always 

662
00:41:46,240 --> 00:41:54,080
been like, oh, it could really 
fuck up their money flow, like 

663
00:41:54,080 --> 00:41:56,520
the Wags money flow because 
they've planned, you know, 

664
00:41:56,520 --> 00:42:00,120
content for a tournament or 
maybe they want to do 2 weekly 

665
00:42:00,120 --> 00:42:02,880
vlogs of a Grand Slam rather 
than one. 

666
00:42:02,880 --> 00:42:06,520
Or maybe they have content 
opportunities later on in the 

667
00:42:06,800 --> 00:42:09,360
week. 
And it's so dependent on, you 

668
00:42:09,360 --> 00:42:12,000
know, how their partner 
progresses in the draw. 

669
00:42:12,000 --> 00:42:14,120
So I always thought that was a 
little unfair. 

670
00:42:14,120 --> 00:42:16,960
You know, Taylor, why aren't you
thinking of content when you're 

671
00:42:16,960 --> 00:42:18,880
flopping in the third round or 
whatever? 

672
00:42:19,400 --> 00:42:24,160
But I think that clearly what it
does with that added precarity 

673
00:42:24,160 --> 00:42:29,640
is Wags then have the ability to
kind of front load their content

674
00:42:29,640 --> 00:42:34,960
and be like, I know I'm going to
Wimbledon, so I'm going to book,

675
00:42:34,960 --> 00:42:38,880
you know, these brand deals that
I can shoot before the 

676
00:42:38,880 --> 00:42:42,520
tournament even starts or I can 
attend these events or whatever.

677
00:42:42,760 --> 00:42:46,560
So they can really hedge their 
bets rather than relying on the 

678
00:42:46,560 --> 00:42:51,080
tournament to help them kind of 
extend the content that that 

679
00:42:51,080 --> 00:42:54,640
they can get. 
But I think that generally the 

680
00:42:54,640 --> 00:42:59,960
precarity in how much you can 
make from a tennis tournament is

681
00:43:00,640 --> 00:43:03,240
super interesting. 
Obviously for a top player like 

682
00:43:03,240 --> 00:43:07,240
Fritz, nobody is like, oh Boo 
Hoo, you missed out on an extra 

683
00:43:07,480 --> 00:43:12,120
100 grand by going out around 
earlier than you thought you 

684
00:43:12,120 --> 00:43:14,800
would. 
But something that made me think

685
00:43:14,800 --> 00:43:19,400
about this recently was during 
the one point Slam, when the 

686
00:43:19,400 --> 00:43:24,720
final was for that $1,000,000 
check, was between the ordinary 

687
00:43:25,080 --> 00:43:29,880
guy who had played a bit of 
college tennis who won it, and a

688
00:43:29,880 --> 00:43:33,440
player just outside of the top 
100 called Joanna Garland. 

689
00:43:33,440 --> 00:43:37,080
And she was like, this money is 
going to be life changing in 

690
00:43:37,080 --> 00:43:39,920
terms of what I can do on tour 
in a year. 

691
00:43:39,920 --> 00:43:44,120
And it's like, yeah, I think for
a lot of the players who are 

692
00:43:44,120 --> 00:43:49,040
maybe in, I don't know, outside 
of the top 70 who are still 

693
00:43:49,680 --> 00:43:52,840
going to slams, but maybe going 
out in the first rounds or so, 

694
00:43:53,040 --> 00:43:56,240
you're grateful for the check. 
But it's kind of you're like, 

695
00:43:56,240 --> 00:43:59,360
OK, I've got to go somewhere 
else quickly because this really

696
00:43:59,680 --> 00:44:03,080
makes a huge difference in my 
season that I haven't made the 

697
00:44:03,080 --> 00:44:06,480
second round. 
Yeah, it's, it's a very tough 

698
00:44:06,480 --> 00:44:10,280
sport if you're in the top 70, 
which is, you know, still an 

699
00:44:10,280 --> 00:44:15,560
amazing ranking to have, but 
it's just financially, right, 

700
00:44:15,560 --> 00:44:17,000
It's not really that 
sustainable. 

701
00:44:17,120 --> 00:44:20,240
It's super tough and you can see
you can see why some of them are

702
00:44:20,240 --> 00:44:23,800
like wanting to emulate Morgan 
Riddle, like they're wanting to 

703
00:44:23,800 --> 00:44:29,360
have a really great social media
profile and expand their revenue

704
00:44:29,360 --> 00:44:33,800
streams from beyond just kit 
sponsors and for sure make it a 

705
00:44:33,800 --> 00:44:35,800
tennis tournament. 
They're going to be, you know, I

706
00:44:35,800 --> 00:44:37,800
saw that Zizu Bugs is now big 
on. 

707
00:44:37,800 --> 00:44:40,880
Tick tock is like always on my 
front page. 

708
00:44:40,880 --> 00:44:45,360
I'm like Zizu like he's he posts
like 3 * a day. 

709
00:44:45,360 --> 00:44:49,200
I feel like I don't know. 
But honestly like people shit on

710
00:44:49,200 --> 00:44:51,560
Morgan. 
I like respect. 

711
00:44:52,120 --> 00:44:55,360
I respect her so much. 
Like I'm a very big fan and when

712
00:44:55,360 --> 00:44:59,840
you look at what she has to do 
or has to OK, has to do is maybe

713
00:44:59,840 --> 00:45:03,040
a bit far. 
But the way she sets up going to

714
00:45:03,040 --> 00:45:06,800
Wimbledon or you know, I she 
loves the Australian Open. 

715
00:45:06,800 --> 00:45:12,200
So going to the Australian Open 
and there are just tie insurance

716
00:45:12,200 --> 00:45:17,000
and events and you know, these 
sponsored posts and whatever and

717
00:45:17,000 --> 00:45:20,840
you're like, this is really big.
And Wimbledon for a couple of 

718
00:45:20,840 --> 00:45:26,320
years doing the Wimbledon 
threads little fashion show that

719
00:45:26,320 --> 00:45:31,360
she did the year before last 
when she was still doing 

720
00:45:31,400 --> 00:45:35,760
Wimbledon threads. 
She really outlasted Taylor in 

721
00:45:35,760 --> 00:45:38,160
her time. 
No, she did she in the complex. 

722
00:45:38,240 --> 00:45:40,880
She Yeah, because when she 
partners with the tournament, 

723
00:45:41,280 --> 00:45:44,400
like, they keep her there the 
whole time, which is crazy, 

724
00:45:44,680 --> 00:45:46,240
honestly. 
But like, you know, I was 

725
00:45:46,240 --> 00:45:49,520
thinking like, oh, would you 
want to shape your career around

726
00:45:49,520 --> 00:45:53,520
your partner? 
To me, like that was always a 

727
00:45:53,520 --> 00:45:58,800
bit of a maybe not because it 
can end badly, but you know 

728
00:45:58,800 --> 00:46:01,560
what, credit to her. 
Like she's just done it. 

729
00:46:01,560 --> 00:46:05,000
She's like done it for herself. 
All the people in the past may 

730
00:46:05,000 --> 00:46:13,560
have missed a trick. 
But no, I mean, honestly, like 

731
00:46:13,560 --> 00:46:15,760
she's done so well. 
And what what I will say, like 

732
00:46:15,760 --> 00:46:18,800
her main mission and she says 
this is to bring more visibility

733
00:46:18,960 --> 00:46:22,000
to tennis because especially in 
the US, like we've discussed 

734
00:46:22,000 --> 00:46:27,000
before, it's like not really one
of the top sports unless it's 

735
00:46:27,000 --> 00:46:29,840
like the US Open, people don't 
really talk about tennis that 

736
00:46:29,840 --> 00:46:32,200
much. 
And I do think that she's like 

737
00:46:32,200 --> 00:46:36,160
brought more especially like 
younger audiences and female 

738
00:46:36,160 --> 00:46:39,960
audiences to the sport, which is
also something that we're trying

739
00:46:39,960 --> 00:46:42,440
to do. 
So you know, Morgan, call us. 

740
00:46:43,280 --> 00:46:46,600
And I think she's she's inspired
other Wags to do the same. 

741
00:46:46,680 --> 00:46:50,200
So you know it has this knock on
effect which is. 100% something 

742
00:46:50,200 --> 00:46:54,920
popped up on my explore page 
over the summer and it was this 

743
00:46:54,920 --> 00:46:57,800
girl being like when your 
boyfriend a tennis star, 

744
00:46:57,800 --> 00:47:02,280
whatever, and pictures of her in
Monaco and he's like hitting 

745
00:47:02,280 --> 00:47:03,520
shots. 
I was like, not to be 

746
00:47:03,520 --> 00:47:06,400
derogatory, but which player is 
she talking about? 

747
00:47:06,480 --> 00:47:08,080
I remember this. 
I remember. 

748
00:47:08,080 --> 00:47:12,360
This I was like Click. 
I was like Valentine Vasharo, 

749
00:47:12,360 --> 00:47:13,120
like. 
Are you? 

750
00:47:13,680 --> 00:47:17,320
Like, oh, the guy who always 
gets into Monte Carlo Masters 

751
00:47:17,320 --> 00:47:21,080
just because he's like their 
only homegrown player, actually 

752
00:47:21,080 --> 00:47:24,440
born in Monaco, but you know, 
he's their homegrown player and 

753
00:47:24,440 --> 00:47:29,240
then boom, he is one of my 
favorite players now, now. 

754
00:47:29,560 --> 00:47:32,680
Yeah, the whole. 
Captivated by that whole story 

755
00:47:32,680 --> 00:47:37,120
is just absolute catnip to me. 
And I was so happy to see him. 

756
00:47:37,120 --> 00:47:39,600
I think he reached the third 
round and I was like what a 

757
00:47:39,680 --> 00:47:45,040
great suitable consistent result
for you at your like first main 

758
00:47:45,040 --> 00:47:47,200
draw Grand Slam. 
So I was, I'm very proud of 

759
00:47:47,200 --> 00:47:49,680
that. 
But I was also like, you go, 

760
00:47:49,720 --> 00:47:54,120
Emily, you were hustling when 
your boyfriend was 210th in the 

761
00:47:54,120 --> 00:47:55,960
world. 
I'm sure she has another job, 

762
00:47:55,960 --> 00:47:58,800
something else to do. 
But like, why not be like, this 

763
00:47:58,800 --> 00:48:00,480
is my life. 
This is what's going on. 

764
00:48:00,680 --> 00:48:03,520
Cultivate a little brand. 
And then, Oh my God, suddenly 

765
00:48:03,520 --> 00:48:09,400
he's in the, you know, he's in 
the top 25 and you would there 

766
00:48:09,400 --> 00:48:13,760
in the trenches and now you are 
looking for a spot at the WAG 

767
00:48:13,760 --> 00:48:16,560
top table. 
Totally, and I think own it like

768
00:48:16,560 --> 00:48:21,320
I think also a lot of the, you 
know, girlfriends wives feel 

769
00:48:21,320 --> 00:48:24,280
like they shouldn't over shadow 
their partner in a way, right. 

770
00:48:24,520 --> 00:48:26,600
The whole spotlight should be 
left for them. 

771
00:48:27,200 --> 00:48:31,120
And you know what? 
Nah, they should be right there 

772
00:48:31,120 --> 00:48:33,000
with them if they if they want 
to. 

773
00:48:33,520 --> 00:48:37,040
It's a team effort also I think 
for a player, right, your 

774
00:48:37,040 --> 00:48:40,120
relationship, your stability at 
home is really important, so 

775
00:48:40,120 --> 00:48:42,480
important to your game. 
So, you know, they're, they're 

776
00:48:42,480 --> 00:48:44,640
part of the team as well. 
Yeah, and they need something to

777
00:48:44,640 --> 00:48:47,120
do while they're sitting 
courtside clapping. 

778
00:48:47,480 --> 00:48:50,200
Yeah. 
And just to be completely Craven

779
00:48:50,200 --> 00:48:54,760
and capitalist, but like it's 
also valuable to the player in 

780
00:48:54,760 --> 00:48:57,120
terms of how they want to market
themselves. 

781
00:48:57,120 --> 00:49:00,960
Like if you create an attractive
little little power couple, 

782
00:49:01,400 --> 00:49:04,480
that's that's pretty 
interesting. 

783
00:49:04,480 --> 00:49:08,360
I, I mean, I, I do really like 
Fritz. 

784
00:49:08,400 --> 00:49:12,960
I would love to see Morgan 
Riddle, you know, kissing that 

785
00:49:13,200 --> 00:49:16,320
Wimbledon trophy. 
But you know, in terms of 

786
00:49:17,000 --> 00:49:21,400
watching his game, it is as 
consistent as his strong 

787
00:49:21,400 --> 00:49:22,280
results. 
There is. 

788
00:49:22,720 --> 00:49:25,560
I don't think there would be 
much putting him, you know, on 

789
00:49:25,560 --> 00:49:29,440
the cover of the New York Times 
style section if, you know 

790
00:49:29,440 --> 00:49:32,520
genius marketing morgues hadn't 
dragged him kicking and 

791
00:49:32,520 --> 00:49:34,280
screaming into a totally 
different. 

792
00:49:34,280 --> 00:49:39,480
Side of tennis OK, so we just 
have a couple more questions, 

793
00:49:40,200 --> 00:49:43,960
but we just wanted to understand
like on a day like Friday, which

794
00:49:43,960 --> 00:49:51,400
was insane, how do you manage 
like reporting and writing live 

795
00:49:51,400 --> 00:49:53,360
when everything is kicking off 
like that? 

796
00:49:53,360 --> 00:49:57,640
Like, and how do you manage like
the emotional detachment of like

797
00:49:57,640 --> 00:50:02,400
being a fan, but then also like,
you know, having to write your 

798
00:50:02,400 --> 00:50:06,160
pieces? 
Yeah, there have been many times

799
00:50:06,160 --> 00:50:09,160
when I've had to sort of tuck 
fandom in the back pocket. 

800
00:50:09,160 --> 00:50:11,480
I'm a very emotional person as 
well. 

801
00:50:11,480 --> 00:50:15,120
So there have been one or two 
live blogs when I'm like weeping

802
00:50:15,120 --> 00:50:18,000
whilst typing and I'm like, you 
must keep going. 

803
00:50:18,360 --> 00:50:23,920
But in terms of like covering 
the Alka where I was Vera of 

804
00:50:23,920 --> 00:50:28,080
things unfolding on court is is 
really fun because you start 

805
00:50:28,080 --> 00:50:30,560
with one thing and then for 
online, you can just build it 

806
00:50:30,560 --> 00:50:34,280
out and add in these interesting
little details where you see 

807
00:50:34,560 --> 00:50:37,800
moments elsewhere. 
And unfortunately I was not down

808
00:50:37,800 --> 00:50:40,080
under. 
So I think the most important 

809
00:50:40,080 --> 00:50:47,320
thing when you are doing a story
like that, so for example, you 

810
00:50:47,320 --> 00:50:50,000
know, you're writing about what 
someone was saying in German. 

811
00:50:50,000 --> 00:50:54,920
And so I had first seen the 
argument on a little clip on 

812
00:50:54,920 --> 00:50:56,520
Twitter. 
And you don't know if the person

813
00:50:56,520 --> 00:50:58,840
who has captioned that is just 
taking the piss. 

814
00:50:58,840 --> 00:51:01,960
They hate Zverev and they want 
to make him look like he's being

815
00:51:01,960 --> 00:51:04,920
a diva when actually he was 
saying, you know, can I go to 

816
00:51:04,920 --> 00:51:07,040
the bathroom now just in a 
really aggressive way or 

817
00:51:07,040 --> 00:51:09,000
something like that because I 
don't speak German. 

818
00:51:09,360 --> 00:51:13,000
So I think the important thing 
about working quickly in the 

819
00:51:13,000 --> 00:51:17,600
moment is making sure to like 
multi source things and really 

820
00:51:17,600 --> 00:51:22,600
make sure that the accuracy 
falling for something that 

821
00:51:22,600 --> 00:51:26,600
you're not able to verify. 
And so things like, you know, 

822
00:51:26,680 --> 00:51:32,920
working out had Alcaraz vomited 
or not the glamour of my life. 

823
00:51:32,920 --> 00:51:36,720
You're like, OK, let me see if I
can find, you know, a commentary

824
00:51:36,720 --> 00:51:40,800
clip rather than just a stale 
image or, you know, because it's

825
00:51:40,960 --> 00:51:44,240
there are so many that are 
luckily not professionally, but 

826
00:51:44,240 --> 00:51:48,120
there are so many made-up things
online that I've just fallen 

827
00:51:48,120 --> 00:51:49,680
for. 
I am so gullible. 

828
00:51:50,560 --> 00:51:52,640
So I think, I think all of us, 
yes. 

829
00:51:53,240 --> 00:51:57,440
Always check and double check 
and triple check your sources 

830
00:51:57,440 --> 00:52:02,480
and your quotes and make sure 
that you're, you know, you're 

831
00:52:02,480 --> 00:52:06,960
finding the, the German site 
that has taken the quotes, for 

832
00:52:06,960 --> 00:52:10,160
example, and then translating 
those rather than just being 

833
00:52:10,160 --> 00:52:12,480
like, Oh, whatever they say on 
Reddit is true. 

834
00:52:12,480 --> 00:52:19,200
And so I think it's the ability 
to be like, I know I have to do 

835
00:52:19,720 --> 00:52:24,840
different things at the same 
time, but I can't let that quest

836
00:52:24,840 --> 00:52:30,960
for being the fastest and having
the quotes first be at the 

837
00:52:30,960 --> 00:52:33,720
detriment of having the right 
quotes. 

838
00:52:34,160 --> 00:52:40,440
So my first real jobs in 
journalism were live blogging 

839
00:52:40,600 --> 00:52:43,640
and actually the Winter 
Olympics. 

840
00:52:43,640 --> 00:52:46,040
So I'm like, oh, it's my four 
year anniversary of getting a 

841
00:52:46,040 --> 00:52:47,480
job. 
I'm so happy. 

842
00:52:47,880 --> 00:52:51,880
I still quite like the thrill of
doing live written coverage 

843
00:52:51,880 --> 00:52:55,040
because it's almost comforting 
how limited you are. 

844
00:52:55,040 --> 00:52:59,120
You're like ione, I'm a person 
with a pair of eyes and some 

845
00:52:59,120 --> 00:53:01,240
hands and I I, you know, if I 
miss something, I miss 

846
00:53:01,240 --> 00:53:04,160
something. 
But it's like looking for the 

847
00:53:04,160 --> 00:53:09,960
little detail that keeps people 
interested in live text coverage

848
00:53:09,960 --> 00:53:13,960
that is like maybe a little bit 
of context that they missed or, 

849
00:53:14,280 --> 00:53:18,600
you know, at finding a video 
that's, I don't know, maybe only

850
00:53:18,600 --> 00:53:21,640
going around tennis Twitter and 
not on the mainstream yet or 

851
00:53:21,640 --> 00:53:24,800
whatever. 
And so like, I quite like 

852
00:53:25,000 --> 00:53:27,360
working quite quickly and 
looking through things quite 

853
00:53:27,360 --> 00:53:31,080
quickly. 
So it means that hopefully I'm a

854
00:53:31,080 --> 00:53:34,800
little better at putting my 
emotions on the back seat and 

855
00:53:34,800 --> 00:53:38,520
not being like, I can't believe 
Zvera was complaining. 

856
00:53:39,360 --> 00:53:41,800
He's what a what? 
A diva as opposed to? 

857
00:53:41,800 --> 00:53:44,520
That's what I would. 
Know Sarah being a diva, that's 

858
00:53:44,560 --> 00:53:46,280
a. 
That is a legitimate complaint. 

859
00:53:46,280 --> 00:53:48,320
You've got to. 
You've got to be like, OK, what 

860
00:53:48,320 --> 00:53:51,520
if Alcaraz was doing this? 
We can't just baby girl Alcaraz.

861
00:53:51,520 --> 00:53:55,600
We have to apply fair. 
Yeah, objectivity. 

862
00:53:55,920 --> 00:53:57,240
Fair. 
Objectivity. 

863
00:53:57,360 --> 00:54:00,120
Well, respect, because I 
wouldn't be able to to maintain 

864
00:54:00,120 --> 00:54:02,920
that objectivity. 
No, no, me neither. 

865
00:54:07,800 --> 00:54:10,000
OK, so should we do our final 
call? 

866
00:54:10,280 --> 00:54:13,640
Let's do it. 
What is 1 storyline that we're 

867
00:54:13,640 --> 00:54:18,800
excited to follow this season? 
I think the storyline I am 

868
00:54:19,280 --> 00:54:23,040
looking forward to, but also a 
little nervous about is the 

869
00:54:23,040 --> 00:54:29,040
return of Jack Draper, who had 
the most amazing front end of 

870
00:54:29,040 --> 00:54:33,680
the year and, you know, won his 
first Masters. 

871
00:54:33,760 --> 00:54:40,600
And does to me still seem like 
one of the more realistic 

872
00:54:40,640 --> 00:54:45,280
candidates, the non public and 
Medvedev candidates to challenge

873
00:54:45,520 --> 00:54:50,320
that top two set up that we have
at the top of men's tennis. 

874
00:54:51,160 --> 00:54:55,880
And he has been out for a 
really, really long time. 

875
00:54:56,120 --> 00:55:00,920
And I think it's become more and
more concerning with every 

876
00:55:01,440 --> 00:55:05,080
opportunity or planned comeback 
that he has had over the past 

877
00:55:05,080 --> 00:55:07,600
few months that he's just said, 
Nope, I'm not ready yet. 

878
00:55:07,840 --> 00:55:12,440
So he didn't make it to the 
Australian Open, but is, I 

879
00:55:12,440 --> 00:55:19,000
believe, still on track to make 
his return at the Davis Cup next

880
00:55:19,000 --> 00:55:22,000
week. 
So it will be really exciting 

881
00:55:22,000 --> 00:55:25,880
having seen how well he did at 
his peak. 

882
00:55:25,880 --> 00:55:32,440
At his fittest, he has a lot of 
points to defend but he is super

883
00:55:32,440 --> 00:55:35,040
exciting and very, very good for
British tennis. 

884
00:55:35,040 --> 00:55:38,920
So his absence I think is really
deeply felt and it will just be 

885
00:55:38,920 --> 00:55:43,120
interesting to see how he gets 
on after being out for such a 

886
00:55:43,120 --> 00:55:45,600
long time. 
For sure and I also just I think

887
00:55:45,600 --> 00:55:49,240
it's worth saying like good for 
him for staying out and wanting 

888
00:55:49,240 --> 00:55:52,440
to like be 100% before he comes 
back because otherwise it could 

889
00:55:52,440 --> 00:55:55,120
set him back a whole lot more on
my end. 

890
00:55:56,320 --> 00:56:00,400
Mine is going to be who he's 
going to fill that third man 

891
00:56:00,400 --> 00:56:04,320
spot. 
That's what I'm excited to see. 

892
00:56:04,320 --> 00:56:06,240
Whether it's going to be like, I
don't know. 

893
00:56:06,520 --> 00:56:09,320
I would like it to be like a 
roster of different people and 

894
00:56:09,320 --> 00:56:11,400
make it fun rather than just 
one. 

895
00:56:11,680 --> 00:56:13,280
But who knows? 
We'll see. 

896
00:56:14,080 --> 00:56:18,360
What about you, Andrea? 
Mine is I want to see whether 

897
00:56:18,360 --> 00:56:21,080
Amanda and Esmova can can win a 
Slam final. 

898
00:56:21,440 --> 00:56:25,400
She made it to two last season, 
so let's see what happens this 

899
00:56:25,440 --> 00:56:26,880
this season. 
Obviously the women's game is 

900
00:56:26,880 --> 00:56:30,280
always a bit more interesting in
that sense, right? 

901
00:56:30,280 --> 00:56:33,080
It's it's more up in the air. 
I hope for her she can. 

902
00:56:34,400 --> 00:56:37,120
Yeah, we'd love to see it. 
Also like the variation of 

903
00:56:37,280 --> 00:56:41,040
winners on the women's side, 
given all we just discussed. 

904
00:56:41,360 --> 00:56:42,720
Yeah. 
OK. 

905
00:56:42,720 --> 00:56:45,120
So that concludes this very 
exciting interview. 

906
00:56:45,200 --> 00:56:48,080
Thank you so much tomorrow for 
coming on. 

907
00:56:48,360 --> 00:56:51,800
We would love to have you back 
anytime. 

908
00:56:52,120 --> 00:56:54,120
It's such a pleasure. 
Thank you so much for having me.

909
00:56:54,160 --> 00:56:59,080
I will come back anytime. 
And yeah, everybody listening, 

910
00:56:59,080 --> 00:57:06,160
don't forget to like, follow, 
subscribe wherever you get your 

911
00:57:06,160 --> 00:57:10,560
podcasts and on social media, 
Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, 

912
00:57:11,080 --> 00:57:13,640
we're there. 
Thanks to all our new listeners 

913
00:57:13,640 --> 00:57:17,920
for tuning in as well. 
And be sure to come back next 

914
00:57:17,920 --> 00:57:22,920
week because we have a very big 
episode dropping with a pretty 

915
00:57:22,920 --> 00:57:26,760
big name in tennis. 
So yeah, can't wait to see you 

916
00:57:26,760 --> 00:57:30,600
then. 
Thanks for listening. 

917
00:57:30,840 --> 00:57:34,400
That's it from us this week. 
If you enjoyed the episode, make

918
00:57:34,400 --> 00:57:37,200
the call, follow rate and share 
it with someone who loves the 

919
00:57:37,200 --> 00:57:38,680
drama as much as the. 
Sports. 

920
00:57:38,880 --> 00:57:42,200
Send us your voice notes, hot 
takes, and soft launch sightings

921
00:57:42,320 --> 00:57:45,640
at What's the Call Pod. 
Until next time, what's the 

922
00:57:45,640 --> 00:57:46,120
call?
