1
00:00:14,760 --> 00:00:18,440
Welcome to the APM podcast. 
APM is the chartered body for 

2
00:00:18,440 --> 00:00:21,800
the project profession. 
My name is Emma Devita and I'm 

3
00:00:21,800 --> 00:00:25,200
the editor of Project APM's 
quarterly journal and your host 

4
00:00:25,920 --> 00:00:29,240
in this podcast for exploring 
the world of systems thinking. 

5
00:00:29,880 --> 00:00:33,200
Ever been daunted about the term
or what it might mean exactly? 

6
00:00:33,560 --> 00:00:37,200
Then we will enlighten you. 
Helping me explain everything 

7
00:00:37,200 --> 00:00:40,680
and how you can put system 
syncing into practise and what 

8
00:00:40,680 --> 00:00:44,000
advantages it gives you in your 
projects are the coauthors of 

9
00:00:44,000 --> 00:00:48,400
APM's new guide, Doing the Right
Project Using Systems Thinking 

10
00:00:48,400 --> 00:00:51,440
to Select the Right Project, 
which you can buy on the APM 

11
00:00:51,440 --> 00:00:56,600
website to apm.org.uk. 
So joining me are Andrew Wright,

12
00:00:56,680 --> 00:00:59,920
leader of the APM Systems 
Thinking Interest Network and 

13
00:00:59,920 --> 00:01:04,120
managing partner of Dynamic 
Technologies, Cesar Rendora, 

14
00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:07,560
head of engineering major 
programmes at Jacobs and Esther 

15
00:01:07,560 --> 00:01:10,760
Bennett, head of programme and 
PMO at Thalas UK. 

16
00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:14,680
Listen on for what systems 
thinking is, how it improves 

17
00:01:14,680 --> 00:01:18,080
project outcomes and how it can 
benefit you as a project 

18
00:01:18,080 --> 00:01:20,000
professional. 
So let's get to it. 

19
00:01:21,040 --> 00:01:23,920
So why don't we begin by each of
you telling us a little bit 

20
00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:27,720
about your role and where your 
interest in systems thinking 

21
00:01:27,720 --> 00:01:30,160
comes from. 
Andrew, do you want to kick off?

22
00:01:31,720 --> 00:01:34,240
Well, I'm a project consultant. 
I've been for a long time now. 

23
00:01:34,800 --> 00:01:39,480
I'm a mentor and for project 
managers, programme managers and

24
00:01:39,560 --> 00:01:45,320
university teacher on occasion. 
My systems thinking stems from 

25
00:01:45,320 --> 00:01:51,040
my education of the life 
scientist, brain biochemistry, 

26
00:01:51,200 --> 00:01:55,160
moving on to working on AI and 
holistic thinking in Defence. 

27
00:01:57,160 --> 00:02:03,680
The The thing is that in life 
sciences and earth sciences as 

28
00:02:03,680 --> 00:02:07,400
well, you learn that everything 
is about interconnecting, 

29
00:02:07,400 --> 00:02:12,720
interacting systems. 
And it just meant that during 

30
00:02:13,040 --> 00:02:15,880
school and university, that's 
the way I started to think 

31
00:02:15,880 --> 00:02:17,760
anyway. 
OK. 

32
00:02:17,760 --> 00:02:20,360
Thank you. 
Esther, tell us a bit about your

33
00:02:20,360 --> 00:02:24,000
current role and where you're 
interested in systems thinking 

34
00:02:24,000 --> 00:02:27,960
comes. 
From so my current role as head 

35
00:02:27,960 --> 00:02:32,520
of Programme and PMO at Telus 
UK, I'm involved in a lot of 

36
00:02:32,520 --> 00:02:37,720
complex systems that my interest
in system thinking I guess 

37
00:02:37,720 --> 00:02:41,320
started with my career. 
One of the things that I did 

38
00:02:41,320 --> 00:02:46,000
earlier on was looking at whole 
system paradigms and, and that 

39
00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:48,160
sort of give give me an 
understanding. 

40
00:02:48,160 --> 00:02:50,840
I guess at the time we didn't 
call this system thinking, but 

41
00:02:50,840 --> 00:02:54,120
we just did it. 
Yeah, we're talking maybe a 

42
00:02:54,120 --> 00:02:58,440
couple of decades ago before 
this became a thing to as it is 

43
00:02:58,440 --> 00:03:01,360
today. 
But yeah, it was in the context 

44
00:03:01,360 --> 00:03:05,160
of looking at an entire system 
from a technical point of view 

45
00:03:05,160 --> 00:03:08,800
and understanding the social 
international interactions 

46
00:03:09,200 --> 00:03:12,800
within that. 
And that has sort of matured my 

47
00:03:12,800 --> 00:03:14,840
understanding into where we are 
today. 

48
00:03:16,120 --> 00:03:16,760
OK. 
Thank you. 

49
00:03:16,760 --> 00:03:21,240
And Cesar? 
Hi Emma, I work for Jacobs and I

50
00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:26,000
lead the team of designers. 
The designs work for 

51
00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:31,680
infrastructure projects mostly 
in the UK but also in my past 

52
00:03:31,680 --> 00:03:35,440
career. 
I also work in overseas 

53
00:03:35,440 --> 00:03:40,640
countries and this led me to 
realise no project really is 

54
00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:44,680
quite unique is it requires an 
understanding of diverse things 

55
00:03:45,200 --> 00:03:50,520
in some most of them 
interrelated and it's really I'm

56
00:03:50,520 --> 00:03:54,800
more into the delivery of 
projects as well as designing. 

57
00:03:55,280 --> 00:04:00,600
So I get involved in meeting 
with clients the the various 

58
00:04:00,680 --> 00:04:04,680
approving authorities. 
Sometimes I participate in 

59
00:04:04,680 --> 00:04:11,520
public consultation events for 
planning purposes and and that 

60
00:04:11,560 --> 00:04:16,240
led me to one thing to 
understand more of how to deal 

61
00:04:16,240 --> 00:04:24,040
with project complex projects 
and systems thinking got me into

62
00:04:24,040 --> 00:04:27,120
system thinking. 
When I joined actually 8:00 PM 

63
00:04:27,200 --> 00:04:32,320
sometime like 2020 I think as a 
part of the member of the team 

64
00:04:32,320 --> 00:04:34,960
Systems Thinking special 
interest group, it was called 

65
00:04:34,960 --> 00:04:38,640
then with very little knowledge 
of what systems thinking is all 

66
00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:42,600
about, just word that I think, 
yeah, it must be something about

67
00:04:43,440 --> 00:04:47,080
looking more, more better 
understanding of complex things 

68
00:04:47,080 --> 00:04:50,640
and sort of I joined and I'm 
still developing my 

69
00:04:50,640 --> 00:04:53,400
understanding on that. 
OK. 

70
00:04:53,400 --> 00:04:56,320
So you're all involved in that 
particular interest network, 

71
00:04:56,320 --> 00:04:58,680
can't you? 
So you've all worked together as

72
00:04:58,680 --> 00:05:03,240
well on doing the right project,
which is we'll pursue that as we

73
00:05:03,240 --> 00:05:05,400
talk. 
But do you know, it might be 

74
00:05:05,400 --> 00:05:08,240
really interesting to give 
listeners an overview or a 

75
00:05:08,240 --> 00:05:11,880
definition of what system 
syncing is, because it sounds 

76
00:05:11,880 --> 00:05:14,880
like such a huge thing to get 
your head around. 

77
00:05:15,320 --> 00:05:17,960
And how on earth does it relate 
to project delivery, project 

78
00:05:17,960 --> 00:05:20,240
execution? 
So I wanted to do, I'd like to 

79
00:05:20,240 --> 00:05:22,520
join those dots today as we 
talk. 

80
00:05:23,320 --> 00:05:26,280
So who's going to be brave 
enough to try and give any brief

81
00:05:26,280 --> 00:05:29,800
explanation of what systems 
thinking is and what it's 

82
00:05:29,800 --> 00:05:33,920
origins are? 
Andrew, would you like to take 

83
00:05:33,920 --> 00:05:39,000
on the challenge? 
Well, systems thinking is a bit 

84
00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:43,080
of, it's a bit of a misnomer. 
It's, it sounds very scientific,

85
00:05:43,080 --> 00:05:46,440
but it's, it's about 
understanding that nothing is 

86
00:05:46,440 --> 00:05:50,560
just individual bits that, that 
don't interact with each other, 

87
00:05:50,600 --> 00:05:56,560
that that everything in life is 
built up of interacting systems 

88
00:05:56,560 --> 00:05:59,000
of activity. 
If you'll think about a car, 

89
00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:02,080
it's got all sorts of 
interacting bits systems in it, 

90
00:06:03,280 --> 00:06:06,040
in the brain. 
We've got all sorts of different

91
00:06:06,360 --> 00:06:11,200
systems that cause allows us to,
to walk in a straight line to, 

92
00:06:11,600 --> 00:06:14,160
to drink water and tap our heads
at the same time. 

93
00:06:14,560 --> 00:06:19,520
Everything in there is is 
complicated sets of systems 

94
00:06:19,520 --> 00:06:24,520
interacting with each other. 
And one of the things we can see

95
00:06:24,520 --> 00:06:28,080
from from behaviour and human 
behaviour is when those the way 

96
00:06:28,080 --> 00:06:32,560
those systems behave together 
can produce unpredictable 

97
00:06:32,560 --> 00:06:37,920
results. 
And I think they my my favourite

98
00:06:37,920 --> 00:06:42,800
example of system multiple 
systems leading to loose screen 

99
00:06:42,800 --> 00:06:45,640
of death is of course, computer 
operating systems. 

100
00:06:45,640 --> 00:06:48,600
You know, you have to, you have 
to reboot them after a while 

101
00:06:48,600 --> 00:06:53,600
because they, they simply get 
their, get themselves knotted, 

102
00:06:54,280 --> 00:06:58,880
absolutely stuffed. 
So, so systems thinking is about

103
00:06:58,880 --> 00:07:02,240
understanding that things are 
dynamic, that that there are 

104
00:07:02,240 --> 00:07:06,360
complicated sets of things 
interacting in different ways. 

105
00:07:06,960 --> 00:07:09,800
And the most complicated of all 
those are people. 

106
00:07:11,760 --> 00:07:15,320
And in terms of its origins as a
discipline, it dates back into 

107
00:07:15,320 --> 00:07:18,600
the last century. 
And I'm sure ESTA can give a, a 

108
00:07:18,600 --> 00:07:20,960
better background on that than I
can. 

109
00:07:21,480 --> 00:07:26,400
As I said, my, my interest comes
at it from the fact that in life

110
00:07:26,400 --> 00:07:30,160
sciences, you just see 
everything naturally as systems.

111
00:07:30,160 --> 00:07:33,920
It's, it's not a it's, it's a 
natural way to understand things

112
00:07:33,960 --> 00:07:37,920
from life science. 
So why don't you tell us a bit 

113
00:07:38,320 --> 00:07:41,760
more about the origins of how, I
mean, how you first came across 

114
00:07:41,760 --> 00:07:44,720
it as well? 
Yeah, I guess I can. 

115
00:07:44,720 --> 00:07:49,480
I can probably respond from the 
origins in my, in my perspective

116
00:07:49,480 --> 00:07:54,160
and how I sort of came across 
systems thinking as an approach 

117
00:07:55,480 --> 00:07:58,560
in the environment that I have 
been working on, which is 

118
00:07:58,560 --> 00:08:04,000
largely complex projects, you 
know, that sort of take quite a 

119
00:08:04,000 --> 00:08:10,400
long time and they're quite 
interactional in terms of the 

120
00:08:10,400 --> 00:08:12,760
technical aspects as well as the
people aspect. 

121
00:08:14,280 --> 00:08:17,440
Problem solving and changes are 
quite dynamic. 

122
00:08:17,960 --> 00:08:20,840
And as Andrew has mentioned 
there, systems thinking is about

123
00:08:21,640 --> 00:08:25,080
approaching a context of a 
system from a, a dynamic 

124
00:08:25,080 --> 00:08:29,640
approach. 
So my initial interactions with 

125
00:08:29,640 --> 00:08:34,039
this approach was in the light 
of problem solving, defining 

126
00:08:34,039 --> 00:08:37,760
requirements, understanding what
the stakeholder is after and 

127
00:08:37,760 --> 00:08:40,919
this tools and methods and 
approaches that we took on at 

128
00:08:40,919 --> 00:08:45,480
the time to try and make sense 
of this dynamic complex 

129
00:08:45,480 --> 00:08:47,840
environment that was evolving 
quite rapidly. 

130
00:08:48,920 --> 00:08:52,560
But as I said earlier on, the 
approaches that we were using 

131
00:08:52,640 --> 00:08:55,360
was a system thinking approach, 
but we didn't call it that. 

132
00:08:56,120 --> 00:08:59,400
So the tools that we were using 
at the time, whether it's mind 

133
00:08:59,400 --> 00:09:04,000
mapping, whether it's casual 
loops, they they were helping to

134
00:09:04,000 --> 00:09:07,400
understand the complexity that 
we were dealing with and still 

135
00:09:07,400 --> 00:09:09,960
are. 
But it's understanding the 

136
00:09:09,960 --> 00:09:13,960
overall system behaviour, the 
dynamics that human interaction 

137
00:09:13,960 --> 00:09:17,800
brings into that and the widest 
take hold environment as well 

138
00:09:17,800 --> 00:09:21,720
and how the two come together. 
So which tools and approaches we

139
00:09:21,720 --> 00:09:25,040
need to use for different 
aspects is how I first started 

140
00:09:25,680 --> 00:09:27,800
my journey of on systems 
thinking. 

141
00:09:28,600 --> 00:09:32,480
And yeah, it's interesting 
because there isn't A1 size fits

142
00:09:32,480 --> 00:09:36,160
all definition to this. 
But I guess maybe the keywords 

143
00:09:36,160 --> 00:09:40,440
that you will hear mentioned in 
any definition is about the 

144
00:09:40,440 --> 00:09:45,160
dynamism of of a complex system 
and the fact that it's evolving 

145
00:09:45,160 --> 00:09:47,800
quite rapidly. 
And you need to make sense of 

146
00:09:47,800 --> 00:09:52,360
that with multiple lenses and 
not just a technical view or a 

147
00:09:52,360 --> 00:09:56,760
humanistic view. 
OK, that's a lot to take in. 

148
00:09:57,800 --> 00:10:01,240
I think the question I'd like to
ask is someone who's outside of 

149
00:10:01,240 --> 00:10:06,000
this is the intention then. 
It's not to increase the 

150
00:10:06,000 --> 00:10:10,520
complexity, it's to make sense 
of the complexity that exists 

151
00:10:10,520 --> 00:10:14,480
already. 
Absolutely 11. 

152
00:10:15,080 --> 00:10:16,280
OK. 
Susan, is there anything you'd 

153
00:10:16,280 --> 00:10:21,800
like to add to that? 
Yes, so for me systems thinking 

154
00:10:21,800 --> 00:10:26,120
is more related to us as an 
engineering consultant and is 

155
00:10:26,120 --> 00:10:29,720
looking at problems and and 
understanding how to solve that 

156
00:10:29,720 --> 00:10:34,600
problem. 
So, so first of all, we look at 

157
00:10:35,560 --> 00:10:39,560
because of my background at an 
issue more on the technical 

158
00:10:39,560 --> 00:10:41,920
aspect, how to provide the 
solution. 

159
00:10:41,920 --> 00:10:47,160
But as as you dig deeper, you 
realise that it's not just the 

160
00:10:47,160 --> 00:10:50,280
purely technical aspect. 
You need to consider how would a

161
00:10:50,280 --> 00:10:55,360
certain project would impact a 
community, the environment and, 

162
00:10:55,360 --> 00:10:59,520
and in fact, in deserving that, 
that solution, you need to 

163
00:10:59,520 --> 00:11:02,760
ensure that the client actually 
is satisfied with the the 

164
00:11:02,800 --> 00:11:07,840
outcome and the the, the 
intended users of that, that 

165
00:11:08,000 --> 00:11:11,920
that what if that's a project, 
if it's a railway project or a 

166
00:11:11,920 --> 00:11:15,080
road project, and whether it 
would be beneficial. 

167
00:11:15,080 --> 00:11:18,600
So she, so that's how I look at 
systems thinking is sort of 

168
00:11:18,600 --> 00:11:21,440
understanding that whole process
right from the beginning of 

169
00:11:21,960 --> 00:11:25,160
looking at the conception of a 
project with developing that 

170
00:11:25,160 --> 00:11:28,600
and, and providing that, 
delivering that solution all the

171
00:11:28,600 --> 00:11:32,840
way and, and ensuring that there
is it is a successful 1. 

172
00:11:34,560 --> 00:11:37,960
So I think I think the, you 
know, both Esther and, and 

173
00:11:37,960 --> 00:11:41,440
Andrew already defined it. 
So I think it's more the 

174
00:11:41,440 --> 00:11:45,640
holistic view and, and, and 
there's always this cause and 

175
00:11:45,640 --> 00:11:50,120
effect relationship in, in any, 
any consideration of a system 

176
00:11:50,480 --> 00:11:53,360
from project point of view, in 
particular, you know, you, 

177
00:11:53,680 --> 00:11:58,920
there's, there's a pull from the
constraint of the project in 

178
00:11:58,920 --> 00:12:02,480
terms of financial costs. 
And then there's a need to also 

179
00:12:02,480 --> 00:12:05,760
to perhaps to consider the time 
aspect, deliver as quick as 

180
00:12:05,760 --> 00:12:09,040
possible and to, to equality and
other considerations. 

181
00:12:09,040 --> 00:12:13,680
Nowadays, we also include 
sustainable solutions and and 

182
00:12:13,680 --> 00:12:15,160
and other matters. 
Yes. 

183
00:12:16,920 --> 00:12:19,040
So really it's about 
understanding the bigger picture

184
00:12:19,040 --> 00:12:23,360
on how the project fits within 
that, I think, which sounds 

185
00:12:23,360 --> 00:12:26,920
entirely sensible to me, but it 
must be challenging the way that

186
00:12:26,920 --> 00:12:28,760
project management might usually
be done. 

187
00:12:28,760 --> 00:12:31,680
I mean, how does systems 
thinking relate to the 

188
00:12:31,680 --> 00:12:35,600
prevailing way of thinking about
projects or how prevalent is 

189
00:12:35,600 --> 00:12:37,520
systems thinking across 
projects? 

190
00:12:38,520 --> 00:12:41,360
I don't know like who who would 
like to start answering that 

191
00:12:41,360 --> 00:12:44,480
one. 
I'm happy to take that. 

192
00:12:44,480 --> 00:12:46,400
I can, I can give us a start for
it. 

193
00:12:47,680 --> 00:12:52,280
I guess in the context of 
project delivery, traditionally 

194
00:12:52,280 --> 00:12:56,080
the approaches that we have and 
the tools that we have that that

195
00:12:56,080 --> 00:12:59,960
sort of set the project manager 
and his team or their team on 

196
00:12:59,960 --> 00:13:03,640
the path of delivery, they're 
quite linear in the approach. 

197
00:13:03,640 --> 00:13:06,640
You know you start from point A 
and you finish here and here's 

198
00:13:06,640 --> 00:13:10,480
your budget and these are the 
requirements very clinical in 

199
00:13:10,480 --> 00:13:14,240
the approach. 
But what system thinking does is

200
00:13:14,240 --> 00:13:17,880
looking at that entity called 
the project, but in the 

201
00:13:17,880 --> 00:13:20,440
framework of the environment 
within which it's being 

202
00:13:20,440 --> 00:13:23,400
delivered or being requested by 
the customer. 

203
00:13:24,080 --> 00:13:26,680
And what are the underlying 
factors that are not covered 

204
00:13:26,680 --> 00:13:29,560
within that very clinical 
approach that, you know, the 

205
00:13:29,560 --> 00:13:34,960
said team have been given. 
So what, what systems thinking 

206
00:13:34,960 --> 00:13:37,960
does it disrupts all that? 
And, and it's, you know, Cesar 

207
00:13:37,960 --> 00:13:40,680
said, you start peeling the 
onion layers to understand what 

208
00:13:40,680 --> 00:13:42,880
does this customer really, 
really want that they haven't 

209
00:13:42,880 --> 00:13:44,840
told you? 
And, and within the 

210
00:13:44,840 --> 00:13:47,680
organisation, what is there to 
help us deliver that we're not 

211
00:13:47,680 --> 00:13:51,000
aware of? 
Yeah. 

212
00:13:51,000 --> 00:13:54,680
And it's interesting that you 
say clinical because is systems 

213
00:13:54,680 --> 00:13:57,720
thinking better equipped? 
Is it a better approach for the 

214
00:13:57,720 --> 00:14:00,280
kind of messy world that 
projects get done in? 

215
00:14:00,840 --> 00:14:04,080
Yeah, projects can be messy, I 
think as as textbooks. 

216
00:14:04,080 --> 00:14:07,240
So is it one of the benefits of 
taking a systems thinking 

217
00:14:07,240 --> 00:14:08,720
approach? 
I'll know we'll dive into that 

218
00:14:08,720 --> 00:14:11,480
later. 
But it sounds to me as though 

219
00:14:11,800 --> 00:14:14,640
it's very well matched with what
life and business in the world 

220
00:14:14,640 --> 00:14:17,000
is like at the moment, 
constantly changing, nothing's 

221
00:14:17,000 --> 00:14:20,600
for certain. 
Is that one of these appealing 

222
00:14:20,600 --> 00:14:24,520
aspects of it, Esther? 
Very much so. 

223
00:14:25,320 --> 00:14:27,640
It's understanding that projects
are never delivered in a 

224
00:14:27,640 --> 00:14:30,520
statics, you know, a static mode
there. 

225
00:14:30,560 --> 00:14:34,280
There will be change, there will
be issues, there will be 

226
00:14:34,280 --> 00:14:38,480
problems, but it's always 
bearing in mind that we have to 

227
00:14:38,480 --> 00:14:42,000
deliver as a project community, 
we have to deliver to the 

228
00:14:42,000 --> 00:14:45,520
customer's requirements. 
If the customer needs or has 

229
00:14:45,520 --> 00:14:48,880
expressed a desire to have an 
infrastructure built, it's 

230
00:14:48,880 --> 00:14:52,480
understanding how best to to 
understand the needs and deliver

231
00:14:52,840 --> 00:14:55,960
to the customer's point. 
OK. 

232
00:14:56,040 --> 00:14:58,600
Thank you, Cesar. 
Anything you'd like to add? 

233
00:14:59,560 --> 00:15:02,160
For me, it's again relating to 
projects. 

234
00:15:03,280 --> 00:15:08,720
It's important that everyone in 
the project shares the same 

235
00:15:08,720 --> 00:15:11,040
understanding of what, what the 
goal is. 

236
00:15:11,080 --> 00:15:14,920
And and that's from not just 
from the client and the 

237
00:15:14,920 --> 00:15:18,360
stakeholder, but also the 
project team and and systems 

238
00:15:18,360 --> 00:15:21,360
thinking allows you, gives you 
that tool to that. 

239
00:15:21,360 --> 00:15:25,960
I should be enabled to do that 
because in my limited knowledge 

240
00:15:27,400 --> 00:15:32,880
of systems thinking so far, you 
actually create some sort of a 

241
00:15:32,880 --> 00:15:36,360
graphical representation. 
A model of what? 

242
00:15:36,360 --> 00:15:39,000
What? 
When I say you, I mean the team 

243
00:15:39,000 --> 00:15:44,480
collectively produced a 
graphical representation of the 

244
00:15:44,480 --> 00:15:52,640
understanding of how the system 
performs or acts in a project 

245
00:15:52,640 --> 00:15:55,120
environment. 
For example, you know, what's in

246
00:15:55,120 --> 00:15:58,400
a project, There's how, what, 
what other, whether the, the, 

247
00:15:58,440 --> 00:16:02,160
the, the, the stakeholders, the,
the, the, the community that 

248
00:16:02,160 --> 00:16:07,560
will be impacted, the, the, the 
client side or the, the people 

249
00:16:07,560 --> 00:16:11,160
that needs to provide approval 
as well as the potential users 

250
00:16:11,160 --> 00:16:13,920
later on. 
So it's really basically trying 

251
00:16:13,920 --> 00:16:16,560
to create that understands that 
right from the beginning of the 

252
00:16:16,560 --> 00:16:21,000
project, you try and ensure that
you and your client had the same

253
00:16:21,000 --> 00:16:23,080
understanding and you 
communicate the same 

254
00:16:23,080 --> 00:16:27,240
understanding to your team and, 
and how the, the various factors

255
00:16:27,240 --> 00:16:32,560
that relate will later on, will,
will could have an impact or 

256
00:16:32,760 --> 00:16:36,920
influence how the project 
progresses are interrelated. 

257
00:16:37,280 --> 00:16:41,600
So creating that understanding I
think is key and systems 

258
00:16:41,600 --> 00:16:45,840
thinking provided too, because 
it it is essentially, as I said,

259
00:16:45,920 --> 00:16:50,520
a, a, a graphical way of 
representing, representing a 

260
00:16:50,520 --> 00:16:52,680
collective understanding of 
situation. 

261
00:16:53,960 --> 00:16:57,080
OK, well that's really useful 
because it sounds to me though, 

262
00:16:57,080 --> 00:16:59,080
it's a great way to achieve 
clarity. 

263
00:16:59,680 --> 00:17:02,040
I mean, what is the problem 
you're trying to solve, how 

264
00:17:02,040 --> 00:17:03,120
you're going to go about doing 
it? 

265
00:17:03,120 --> 00:17:05,880
What are the impact, what the 
impacts might be? 

266
00:17:06,520 --> 00:17:10,480
Well, I'd like to ask you what 
benefits system syncing brings. 

267
00:17:10,480 --> 00:17:13,319
You've already touched on that, 
but I just wondered, I mean, do 

268
00:17:13,319 --> 00:17:16,640
you feel that system syncing is 
growing in importance right now 

269
00:17:17,359 --> 00:17:19,720
and that project professionals 
need to take more of an interest

270
00:17:19,720 --> 00:17:21,319
in it? 
I know it's in the APM Body of 

271
00:17:21,319 --> 00:17:24,400
Knowledge, AIDS Edition, so it's
definitely recognised as being 

272
00:17:24,400 --> 00:17:26,839
something very important for 
project professionals to know 

273
00:17:26,839 --> 00:17:30,640
about, but do you think it's of 
particular value right now in 

274
00:17:30,640 --> 00:17:32,840
terms of the projects and 
programmes that are being 

275
00:17:32,840 --> 00:17:35,880
conducted? 
Yeah, absolutely. 

276
00:17:35,880 --> 00:17:39,160
It's and the reason is because 
the world is getting a lot more 

277
00:17:39,160 --> 00:17:42,720
complicated and and that's 
making things more complex. 

278
00:17:43,440 --> 00:17:47,320
And the result of this is that 
more and more projects, despite 

279
00:17:47,320 --> 00:17:52,600
the best efforts of of APM and 
professional bodies and 

280
00:17:52,600 --> 00:17:57,440
education, more and more 
projects are running into 

281
00:17:58,840 --> 00:18:01,920
unplanned unforecast adverse 
events. 

282
00:18:02,960 --> 00:18:10,000
So systems thinking really helps
that foresight, you know, left 

283
00:18:10,000 --> 00:18:14,000
shifting or front end loading to
do the analysis upfront that 

284
00:18:14,000 --> 00:18:17,680
that that actually gives the 
clarity that you talk about as 

285
00:18:17,680 --> 00:18:22,440
to what could go wrong, what 
what could go right, what are 

286
00:18:22,440 --> 00:18:26,360
the opportunities and 
particularly in thoroughly 

287
00:18:26,360 --> 00:18:29,840
understanding the problem you're
trying to solve before you jump 

288
00:18:29,840 --> 00:18:33,600
to a solution. 
So thank you. 

289
00:18:33,600 --> 00:18:35,520
I guess what I'm dying to find 
out more about is how you 

290
00:18:35,520 --> 00:18:38,160
actually use system syncing and 
at what point. 

291
00:18:38,560 --> 00:18:41,880
I know the subtitle for doing 
the right projects is is using a

292
00:18:41,880 --> 00:18:45,320
system syncing approach to 
select successful projects. 

293
00:18:45,880 --> 00:18:48,600
So imagine you start using 
system syncing before the 

294
00:18:48,600 --> 00:18:52,840
project comes into being. 
So it'd be useful for each of 

295
00:18:52,840 --> 00:18:55,680
you to give you an idea of how 
you put this into practise. 

296
00:18:56,000 --> 00:18:58,560
What is it exactly? 
And I know we can't go through 

297
00:18:58,560 --> 00:19:01,760
all the tools and techniques 
that are in the guide, but if 

298
00:19:01,760 --> 00:19:04,360
you perhaps people kind of 
unfamiliar with this, how do you

299
00:19:04,360 --> 00:19:08,120
actually put this into practise?
So Caesar, you sound like you're

300
00:19:08,160 --> 00:19:11,200
quite new to this world, so 
you're probably closest to 

301
00:19:11,200 --> 00:19:14,040
grappling of what it is and how 
you put it into practise. 

302
00:19:14,040 --> 00:19:15,760
So are you happy to show what 
works? 

303
00:19:16,920 --> 00:19:17,600
Sure. 
OK. 

304
00:19:17,600 --> 00:19:22,720
So again I'm grounding it basis 
of the work I do as a consulting

305
00:19:22,720 --> 00:19:26,440
engineer. 
And and so when we look at 

306
00:19:26,440 --> 00:19:33,120
projects, we first of all we, we
look, we, we consult with the 

307
00:19:33,120 --> 00:19:37,080
client, we discuss with the 
client what are their goals and 

308
00:19:37,080 --> 00:19:41,200
it's always about lead towards 
the intended benefit of the 

309
00:19:41,200 --> 00:19:42,720
project. 
So you, you start the beginning,

310
00:19:42,720 --> 00:19:46,440
what does the client want? 
But also you're looking ahead 

311
00:19:46,440 --> 00:19:49,360
and saying it's OK, What, what 
do you really want to achieve? 

312
00:19:49,360 --> 00:19:53,120
What is the intended benefit? 
And, and, and that requires 

313
00:19:53,560 --> 00:19:59,400
that's, that's understanding 
what we call stakeholders, the, 

314
00:19:59,400 --> 00:20:04,560
the, the community, the people, 
the use of the will be affected 

315
00:20:05,000 --> 00:20:09,840
by, by this project eventually. 
And, and, and that's that's 

316
00:20:09,840 --> 00:20:13,320
where a system's thinking, I 
feel in my practise. 

317
00:20:13,720 --> 00:20:18,280
Is very useful. 
First is understanding who those

318
00:20:18,280 --> 00:20:24,400
stakeholders are not just a 
client, the users, but also the 

319
00:20:24,400 --> 00:20:27,240
various, the various entities 
that would be involved from 

320
00:20:27,240 --> 00:20:31,920
approval from who will deliver 
the work as well as the, the 

321
00:20:31,920 --> 00:20:36,440
people that living in the 
community that will will be 

322
00:20:36,440 --> 00:20:39,080
affected during construction 
that also will benefit when the 

323
00:20:39,080 --> 00:20:42,560
construction is finished. 
Each of those I call 

324
00:20:42,560 --> 00:20:46,080
stakeholders will have certain 
needs and wants and some of them

325
00:20:46,080 --> 00:20:49,720
will have certain more more 
influence and power in terms of 

326
00:20:49,720 --> 00:20:52,760
how the project could be, could 
be successful. 

327
00:20:53,200 --> 00:20:58,360
I've been involved in a lot of 
public consultation relating to 

328
00:20:58,360 --> 00:21:01,000
planning in of major projects in
the UK. 

329
00:21:01,000 --> 00:21:02,920
We call it development consent 
order. 

330
00:21:02,920 --> 00:21:09,320
The the formal process and that 
that led me to appreciate the 

331
00:21:09,320 --> 00:21:16,040
wide view of of of various 
committees that need to be 

332
00:21:16,040 --> 00:21:19,400
consulted as well as the need to
be taken into account. 

333
00:21:20,440 --> 00:21:25,480
The views of which could 
eventually put the grant project

334
00:21:25,480 --> 00:21:29,720
into a halt, but also encourage 
others to be more supportive and

335
00:21:30,080 --> 00:21:33,320
and and and and and and 
encourage the the project should

336
00:21:33,320 --> 00:21:39,360
go ahead as soon as possible. 
So for me, a system thinking in,

337
00:21:39,360 --> 00:21:43,040
in practise is about 
understanding that link between 

338
00:21:43,320 --> 00:21:48,320
what the proponents of project, 
the clients want to achieve as a

339
00:21:48,320 --> 00:21:51,120
eventual outcome and the benefit
to the users. 

340
00:21:51,520 --> 00:21:56,120
And, and, and, and me as a, as a
consulting engineer trying to 

341
00:21:56,560 --> 00:22:00,600
help that make sure that that 
becomes happens as a success. 

342
00:22:00,920 --> 00:22:05,040
But by using system thinking, 
for example, to understand 

343
00:22:05,040 --> 00:22:07,560
stakeholders, the various 
stakeholders that will be 

344
00:22:07,560 --> 00:22:12,800
affected and make sure that we 
we engage with them and we and, 

345
00:22:12,800 --> 00:22:15,960
and collaborate with them 
throughout the the stages of the

346
00:22:15,960 --> 00:22:18,480
project from the beginning right
away to the end. 

347
00:22:19,640 --> 00:22:21,680
So what? 
How do you do that in practise? 

348
00:22:21,800 --> 00:22:24,320
Is there a particular tool you 
use to help achieve? 

349
00:22:24,320 --> 00:22:29,920
This if you could. 
Just give one example. 11 aspect

350
00:22:29,920 --> 00:22:34,560
would be to use in in in project
management, the people who are 

351
00:22:34,560 --> 00:22:37,920
familiar with stakeholder 
mapping in systems thinking. 

352
00:22:37,920 --> 00:22:42,720
We have a tool that is actually 
a subject about either webinar 

353
00:22:43,000 --> 00:22:47,720
and I've already presented in 
some of the ATM webinars called 

354
00:22:47,720 --> 00:22:49,840
the Critical Systems Heuristics 
tool. 

355
00:22:50,280 --> 00:22:55,240
It's basically asking several 
questions and this particular 2 

356
00:22:55,240 --> 00:22:58,840
questions, typical 12 questions 
of what is the objective? 

357
00:22:59,320 --> 00:23:02,720
Who is the intended benefit of 
this this project? 

358
00:23:03,000 --> 00:23:05,840
Who is in control of the 
conditions that would enable 

359
00:23:05,840 --> 00:23:09,840
this project success? 
Who who carries the knowledge or

360
00:23:09,840 --> 00:23:13,000
expertise to make this happen? 
Who will be impacted? 

361
00:23:13,400 --> 00:23:17,120
So you, you go through those 
various questions as part of the

362
00:23:17,120 --> 00:23:23,120
process, one as a having 
understanding of the, what the 

363
00:23:23,120 --> 00:23:28,040
client wants and also as a 
project team in order to provide

364
00:23:28,040 --> 00:23:30,800
the solution that will address 
those questions and the 

365
00:23:30,800 --> 00:23:35,880
responses to those questions. 
And that's how basically how we 

366
00:23:35,880 --> 00:23:37,520
did. 
So my, my role is basically to 

367
00:23:37,520 --> 00:23:41,280
provide solution to an 
infrastructure problem, but I 

368
00:23:41,280 --> 00:23:43,920
can't just provide a technical 
solution. 

369
00:23:43,920 --> 00:23:47,640
That's, that's, I feel that can 
be built. 

370
00:23:47,640 --> 00:23:50,280
But also you need to address 
the, the, the views of various 

371
00:23:50,280 --> 00:23:53,000
stakeholders. 
So ask various questions and 

372
00:23:53,000 --> 00:23:58,160
those questions are generated by
the, the team I'm involved in 

373
00:23:58,920 --> 00:24:02,040
who are subject matter experts 
in their own right. 

374
00:24:02,440 --> 00:24:06,080
Because a single person and a 
very, even a very experienced 

375
00:24:06,080 --> 00:24:07,720
project manager doesn't know 
everything. 

376
00:24:08,200 --> 00:24:12,520
So it, it encourages a more 
collaborative approach, engaging

377
00:24:12,520 --> 00:24:16,400
everyone within the team and, 
and, and sometimes also 

378
00:24:16,400 --> 00:24:18,760
including the client 
representative to, to 

379
00:24:18,760 --> 00:24:22,440
understand, do we really 
understand the, the objective 

380
00:24:22,480 --> 00:24:26,920
and, and the potential impact 
and, and the benefits and, and, 

381
00:24:26,920 --> 00:24:31,360
and then come up with a solution
that addresses those as much as 

382
00:24:31,360 --> 00:24:34,680
possible. 
Sometimes it cannot be really 

383
00:24:35,000 --> 00:24:38,200
satisfy everybody. 
It's not, it's not possible, but

384
00:24:38,200 --> 00:24:43,120
you try to maximise the benefits
as much as you can. 

385
00:24:44,240 --> 00:24:46,760
What's impressing me about what 
you're saying is it's very much 

386
00:24:46,760 --> 00:24:48,840
about the people's side of 
things. 

387
00:24:48,920 --> 00:24:51,720
It's speaking to people, it's 
collaborative, it's finding out 

388
00:24:51,720 --> 00:24:55,960
what people want, what potential
problems could be. 

389
00:24:56,520 --> 00:24:58,920
Is this different to how you 
would approach your 

390
00:24:59,240 --> 00:25:01,960
infrastructure projects without 
using system syncing? 

391
00:25:01,960 --> 00:25:05,280
Or the systems syncing 
accentuate with how the best way

392
00:25:05,280 --> 00:25:09,120
to work out all these different 
pieces and how they might fit 

393
00:25:09,120 --> 00:25:12,400
together. 
Systems thinking for me, it 

394
00:25:12,600 --> 00:25:15,440
provides that framework and 
various tools. 

395
00:25:15,440 --> 00:25:18,160
So there's no one tool that's 
applicable to everything. 

396
00:25:18,480 --> 00:25:23,200
So system thinking enables you, 
gives you that that framework 

397
00:25:23,200 --> 00:25:26,840
various tools that's available 
course of loop diagrams is one 

398
00:25:26,840 --> 00:25:31,600
of them. 
But also also the recognition 

399
00:25:31,600 --> 00:25:36,840
that I mean for me as a project 
professional, that I, I don't 

400
00:25:36,840 --> 00:25:40,920
carry all the knowledge and and 
does don't have all the answers.

401
00:25:41,320 --> 00:25:46,680
I need to gather a group of 
individuals within my team and 

402
00:25:46,680 --> 00:25:50,840
specialties if necessary from 
the client side in order to have

403
00:25:50,840 --> 00:25:55,480
a a holistic view of of the 
problem first of all and then 

404
00:25:55,480 --> 00:26:00,680
the the potential solution or 
options and how those potential 

405
00:26:00,680 --> 00:26:03,960
solution could could impact 
could have a potential impact as

406
00:26:03,960 --> 00:26:06,560
well. 
Sounds great. 

407
00:26:06,560 --> 00:26:08,960
It sounds like it's helping you 
to do a better job. 

408
00:26:10,320 --> 00:26:13,680
Is it hard to start going down 
the systems thinking route if 

409
00:26:13,680 --> 00:26:17,920
you haven't really dipped your 
toe in it before or, or is it 

410
00:26:17,920 --> 00:26:20,240
very much a case of you 
experiment a little bit with 

411
00:26:20,240 --> 00:26:22,280
something before you know you 
realise that it's really 

412
00:26:22,280 --> 00:26:26,600
valuable as. 
I said, I, I started the system 

413
00:26:26,600 --> 00:26:31,840
thinking completely green with, 
with no, it's just basic 

414
00:26:31,840 --> 00:26:35,400
knowledge that maybe this, this 
will help me look at things 

415
00:26:35,400 --> 00:26:38,680
holistically and, and what we 
did then. 

416
00:26:38,680 --> 00:26:44,080
And Andrew will remember it was 
during COVID time, the pandemic.

417
00:26:44,680 --> 00:26:52,200
And, and you know, we don't know
what pandemic COVID-19 would 

418
00:26:52,200 --> 00:26:54,560
mean to the UK and the whole 
world. 

419
00:26:54,960 --> 00:26:58,680
And the team actually decided to
use systems thinking, in 

420
00:26:58,680 --> 00:27:02,840
particular the, the, the tool we
called causal loop diagram to 

421
00:27:02,840 --> 00:27:08,720
understand what could be the 
potential impact of a COVID-19 

422
00:27:08,720 --> 00:27:13,760
to the UK and, and what are the 
factors that actually 

423
00:27:13,760 --> 00:27:21,720
influencing it's potential cure 
or, or perhaps how long it would

424
00:27:21,720 --> 00:27:24,120
last. 
And one of the things I 

425
00:27:24,120 --> 00:27:27,320
remembered vividly is that, you 
know, we actually came up with 

426
00:27:27,320 --> 00:27:31,480
a, a very big diagram, but with 
cause and effect relationship. 

427
00:27:31,480 --> 00:27:34,360
But certainly one of the topic 
that was highlighted was about 

428
00:27:34,360 --> 00:27:37,960
remote working, which is now 
the, the, the main thing that 

429
00:27:37,960 --> 00:27:40,320
we, we, we, we're still doing 
now. 

430
00:27:40,680 --> 00:27:44,960
So from very little, no 
understanding of systems 

431
00:27:44,960 --> 00:27:48,080
thinking to being introduced to 
a technique called causa dub 

432
00:27:48,080 --> 00:27:51,920
diagram, I was able to 
contribute hope meaningful 

433
00:27:52,080 --> 00:27:56,840
meaningfully to the discussions 
and, and, and, and also enabled 

434
00:27:56,840 --> 00:28:02,640
me to have a better appreciation
what COVID-19 could mean to the 

435
00:28:03,320 --> 00:28:09,760
UKUK and, and, and the, the 
United Kingdom as well as the 

436
00:28:09,760 --> 00:28:11,960
whole world. 
So it, it just gives you that, 

437
00:28:11,960 --> 00:28:15,920
that bigger perspective that for
me, perhaps it would have taken 

438
00:28:15,920 --> 00:28:20,160
me years and years to understand
to and, but bringing the, the, 

439
00:28:20,160 --> 00:28:22,880
the, the knowledge of the whole 
group helped me to do that. 

440
00:28:23,320 --> 00:28:25,440
I'll pass it over now to Esther 
and Andy. 

441
00:28:26,920 --> 00:28:28,920
Well, thank you. 
It's really useful to listen to 

442
00:28:28,920 --> 00:28:33,040
your experience. 
Esther, tell me a bit about how 

443
00:28:33,040 --> 00:28:35,520
you've put systems sinking into 
practise and the kind of 

444
00:28:35,520 --> 00:28:42,160
benefits it gives you. 
Yeah, I think for me, I can 

445
00:28:42,160 --> 00:28:46,000
answer that into into sort of 
phrases. 

446
00:28:46,000 --> 00:28:53,400
One in my current job, systems 
thinking comes alive at the very

447
00:28:53,400 --> 00:28:57,560
inception of a project. 
And some of the tools we use 

448
00:28:57,560 --> 00:29:00,600
are, you know, just traditional 
mind mapping or you know, rich 

449
00:29:00,600 --> 00:29:05,240
diagrams with the team. 
As Cesar said, it's getting the 

450
00:29:05,240 --> 00:29:07,440
team engaged. 
But what I have found quite 

451
00:29:07,440 --> 00:29:13,680
powerful is bringing in some 
independent members of the 

452
00:29:13,680 --> 00:29:16,160
organisation that are not 
directly involved in the team 

453
00:29:16,160 --> 00:29:19,440
delivery because they get to see
the blind spots, things that 

454
00:29:19,440 --> 00:29:22,920
people haven't thought about. 
So that that's again, the 

455
00:29:22,920 --> 00:29:26,200
powerful element of systems 
thinking approach where you're 

456
00:29:26,200 --> 00:29:28,360
looking at the entire system 
saying, oh, have we thought 

457
00:29:28,360 --> 00:29:31,240
about, you know, somebody if, 
if, if we're doing an 

458
00:29:31,240 --> 00:29:34,400
engineering, which most of the 
projects are, but you know, 

459
00:29:34,400 --> 00:29:37,160
bring somebody who's an 
administrator, for example, and 

460
00:29:37,160 --> 00:29:39,840
just let them come in and for 
half an hour have the 

461
00:29:39,840 --> 00:29:42,360
discussions with them and then 
see what else can they bring 

462
00:29:42,360 --> 00:29:46,040
into the discussions. 
So this happens right at the 

463
00:29:46,040 --> 00:29:50,600
inception before we start even 
putting schedules together, 

464
00:29:51,080 --> 00:29:53,360
before we start decomposing the 
requirements. 

465
00:29:53,680 --> 00:29:57,600
Do we understand the problem? 
Are we all clear with what the 

466
00:29:57,600 --> 00:30:00,360
output is likely to be? 
Is there anything that has been 

467
00:30:00,360 --> 00:30:03,280
missed out? 
So really just laying it all on 

468
00:30:03,280 --> 00:30:08,720
the table and looking at the 
project as an ecosystem with a 

469
00:30:08,720 --> 00:30:12,720
view of delivering a benefit not
just to the immediate customer, 

470
00:30:13,080 --> 00:30:15,320
but to the business and to the 
wide environment. 

471
00:30:15,800 --> 00:30:20,560
It's about getting the right 
project defined upfront and 

472
00:30:20,560 --> 00:30:24,800
having checkpoints in delivery 
in the delivery life cycle and 

473
00:30:25,040 --> 00:30:27,480
delivery doesn't end when we 
have finished all the 

474
00:30:27,480 --> 00:30:30,600
deliverables. 
That includes decommissioning 

475
00:30:30,600 --> 00:30:34,120
and post delivery support. 
So making sure, again when I 

476
00:30:34,120 --> 00:30:38,040
talk about the project 
ecosystem, we have absolutely 

477
00:30:38,040 --> 00:30:42,200
delivered what was expected by 
the customer and internally the 

478
00:30:42,200 --> 00:30:45,280
benefits have been realised for 
the business as well. 

479
00:30:46,680 --> 00:30:48,880
Yeah, it's making me think about
the people's side of projects 

480
00:30:48,880 --> 00:30:52,480
and in particular the way you 
lead projects if you're wanting 

481
00:30:52,480 --> 00:30:55,000
to go and take this approach. 
Because it sounds as though you 

482
00:30:55,000 --> 00:30:59,720
want every stakeholder to be 
able to have their say and and 

483
00:31:00,280 --> 00:31:03,040
everyone trying to uncover 
potential challenges, 

484
00:31:03,160 --> 00:31:05,560
uncertainties and risks that are
involved. 

485
00:31:06,000 --> 00:31:09,080
But for that to happen, you need
a particular project culture, 

486
00:31:09,320 --> 00:31:12,440
one where people feel as though 
they can raise difficulties, 

487
00:31:13,000 --> 00:31:16,080
that kind of that whole idea of 
psychological safety and 

488
00:31:16,080 --> 00:31:19,920
communication. 
So Esther, what's your advice? 

489
00:31:19,920 --> 00:31:23,600
Am I right in thinking that that
it does, it makes you a certain 

490
00:31:23,600 --> 00:31:27,160
type of leader if you want to 
use systems thinking effectively

491
00:31:27,160 --> 00:31:31,160
and, and what might that be? 
What kind of leader are you and 

492
00:31:31,160 --> 00:31:34,280
what kind of culture do you aim 
to create on a project team? 

493
00:31:35,320 --> 00:31:38,920
To to your point, Emma, that the
the people aspect in terms of 

494
00:31:38,920 --> 00:31:42,400
project delivery systems 
thinking does challenge some 

495
00:31:42,400 --> 00:31:45,360
mindset and behaviours and 
cultures and organisations. 

496
00:31:45,840 --> 00:31:49,560
It's tending towards an open 
culture to absolutely get to the

497
00:31:49,560 --> 00:31:52,960
root cause and define what the 
right project is. 

498
00:31:54,440 --> 00:31:57,160
How do you do that in real life?
Because that's easier said than 

499
00:31:57,160 --> 00:32:00,480
done. 
Absolutely, absolutely. 

500
00:32:00,480 --> 00:32:04,640
So one of the things that we 
encourage where I am and the 

501
00:32:04,640 --> 00:32:09,160
work I'm doing at uni as well 
is, is looking at projects as an

502
00:32:09,160 --> 00:32:14,040
entity and ensuring that we have
the right leadership there with 

503
00:32:14,040 --> 00:32:17,720
psychological safety at the 
paramount, at the forefront of 

504
00:32:17,720 --> 00:32:21,400
everything. 
So noting that teams, can this 

505
00:32:21,400 --> 00:32:24,840
have those difficult discussions
because that's integral to 

506
00:32:24,840 --> 00:32:28,680
delivering the project itself. 
How do you achieve that? 

507
00:32:28,680 --> 00:32:30,800
Is it by role modelling it 
yourself? 

508
00:32:31,880 --> 00:32:35,360
Absolutely. 
For myself, it's been vulnerable

509
00:32:35,360 --> 00:32:38,960
noting, as Cesar said, you know,
the project manager, the project

510
00:32:38,960 --> 00:32:42,600
specialist doesn't know 
everything and allowing others 

511
00:32:42,600 --> 00:32:46,840
to fill in the gaps because that
is quite key to getting that 

512
00:32:46,840 --> 00:32:51,640
full picture. 
Caesar, is there anything else 

513
00:32:51,640 --> 00:32:54,440
you'd like to add around the 
leadership side of projects when

514
00:32:54,440 --> 00:32:57,760
it comes to systems thinking and
the kind of project culture you 

515
00:32:57,760 --> 00:33:00,040
need to cultivate in order to 
make the most of it? 

516
00:33:01,320 --> 00:33:06,520
Yes. 
So at work, what we encourage is

517
00:33:07,480 --> 00:33:10,000
project leaders, project 
managers to be more 

518
00:33:10,840 --> 00:33:17,520
collaborative with our team, 
making sure that we engage 

519
00:33:17,520 --> 00:33:25,680
everybody and listen to ideas as
well as concerns to to make this

520
00:33:25,680 --> 00:33:28,200
happen. 
Of course, we need to make sure 

521
00:33:28,200 --> 00:33:33,600
that there's no blame culture 
in, in the project and and that 

522
00:33:33,720 --> 00:33:40,160
everyone is, is, is allowed to 
express their views and, and, 

523
00:33:40,160 --> 00:33:45,320
and be open to, and leaders and 
managers, be open to 

524
00:33:45,320 --> 00:33:51,280
suggestions. 
We, we, it, it comes from, you 

525
00:33:51,520 --> 00:33:53,960
know, it's, it's, you can 
mandate it. 

526
00:33:54,080 --> 00:33:59,320
But in our, in our case, it, we 
actually just encourage to as 

527
00:33:59,320 --> 00:34:03,120
leaders to, to, to be the, the 
example ourselves. 

528
00:34:03,760 --> 00:34:06,400
We use the term leadership, 
leadership shadow. 

529
00:34:06,880 --> 00:34:09,480
Well, whatever you say or do is 
what you practise. 

530
00:34:09,880 --> 00:34:17,480
And so you, you try to be more 
open to your team in terms of 

531
00:34:18,080 --> 00:34:22,639
how the, the, the, the, the, the
project is being viewed by the 

532
00:34:22,639 --> 00:34:27,760
client and any other issues that
are actually sometimes kept by 

533
00:34:27,760 --> 00:34:31,800
the management level. 
But the the members, the the 

534
00:34:31,800 --> 00:34:37,639
members of the team are also 
allowed to to know and not just 

535
00:34:37,639 --> 00:34:42,440
on the commercial aspects, but 
also in terms of potential 

536
00:34:43,360 --> 00:34:46,920
concerns has been expressed by 
the client in terms of how the 

537
00:34:46,920 --> 00:34:50,320
team has been performing. 
Thank you, Cesar. 

538
00:34:51,080 --> 00:34:54,560
Something that's a focus for 
project managers at the moment 

539
00:34:54,560 --> 00:34:58,000
is the idea of, well, AI and 
humans and how we work together.

540
00:34:58,640 --> 00:35:01,520
And there's a lot of talk about 
human skills and AI skills. 

541
00:35:01,520 --> 00:35:04,160
And Andrew, actually it's 
something I probably want to put

542
00:35:04,160 --> 00:35:08,880
to you is how does systems 
thinking affect that? 

543
00:35:08,880 --> 00:35:12,320
So is it a great, is it a great 
way of using AI and what's out 

544
00:35:12,320 --> 00:35:14,800
there to inform what's really 
going on in a project, but also 

545
00:35:14,800 --> 00:35:17,240
maximising the kind of human 
contribution? 

546
00:35:17,840 --> 00:35:20,640
I'm talking very general terms, 
but it's just the way that 

547
00:35:20,640 --> 00:35:22,320
people seem to be framing 
things. 

548
00:35:22,760 --> 00:35:26,800
It's, it's this idea that AI 
brings a set of skills and human

549
00:35:26,800 --> 00:35:30,160
beings another set and we need 
to work alongside each other. 

550
00:35:30,160 --> 00:35:35,920
Just wonder what your take is? 
AI is, is not intelligence. 

551
00:35:36,120 --> 00:35:39,200
What what we have in our heads 
is real intelligence. 

552
00:35:39,560 --> 00:35:44,800
And so I, I see AI as being 
orthogonal to systems thinking. 

553
00:35:44,800 --> 00:35:48,320
Systems thinking is about what 
goes on inside our heads in 

554
00:35:48,320 --> 00:35:53,120
terms of understanding. 
And AI is, is, is a 

555
00:35:53,120 --> 00:35:56,920
productivity, productivity aid. 
It's, it's a, it's a power tool.

556
00:35:57,760 --> 00:36:05,800
So if we are less busy fools by 
using AI, we have more time to 

557
00:36:05,800 --> 00:36:09,160
think and be intelligent. 
And this is a really important 

558
00:36:09,160 --> 00:36:12,320
thing. 
And so systems thinking is a set

559
00:36:12,320 --> 00:36:15,960
of tools and techniques and a 
mindset that allows us to think 

560
00:36:16,720 --> 00:36:22,400
better given that we've got more
time resulting from the the time

561
00:36:22,400 --> 00:36:27,360
saving of using AI to to do a 
better job quicker. 

562
00:36:28,880 --> 00:36:32,640
OK, well, I'll move on. 
Tasking is and we kind of 

563
00:36:32,640 --> 00:36:37,480
touched it already, but Cesar, 
Esther, have you or both of you 

564
00:36:37,480 --> 00:36:41,160
got any advice on how to start 
using system syncing in 

565
00:36:41,160 --> 00:36:43,240
projects? 
If it's something you haven't 

566
00:36:43,240 --> 00:36:46,280
used before, is it something you
can start off with small 

567
00:36:46,280 --> 00:36:50,080
experiments, start lightly and 
then it expands or do you dive 

568
00:36:50,080 --> 00:36:52,000
into it straight away and run 
with it? 

569
00:36:52,080 --> 00:36:55,120
Esther, what's your advice? 
Right. 

570
00:36:55,120 --> 00:36:59,120
So for systems thinking in terms
of adopting that in a project 

571
00:36:59,120 --> 00:37:03,360
delivery context, I'd say to 
anybody you can start where you 

572
00:37:03,360 --> 00:37:08,000
are even as simple as your 
normal standard meetings or any 

573
00:37:08,000 --> 00:37:12,320
major design review or a major 
project review and the simplest 

574
00:37:12,320 --> 00:37:16,560
way of doing it, I'd say it's 
just challenging the status quo.

575
00:37:17,080 --> 00:37:20,120
Here's a schedule telling me 
we'll deliver in three weeks 

576
00:37:20,120 --> 00:37:22,440
time. 
Let's just understand what that 

577
00:37:22,440 --> 00:37:24,880
means. 
Has is everyone brought into 

578
00:37:24,880 --> 00:37:27,280
that deliverable? 
Have we understood the context 

579
00:37:27,280 --> 00:37:29,360
and what the output will look 
like? 

580
00:37:30,720 --> 00:37:35,120
But if somebody was speaking 
this project from the start, I'd

581
00:37:35,120 --> 00:37:38,240
say understand the requirements 
before you start putting a 

582
00:37:38,240 --> 00:37:41,400
schedule together, before you 
take those requirements and 

583
00:37:41,400 --> 00:37:44,800
deploy them on doors. 
Really capture the requirements 

584
00:37:44,800 --> 00:37:47,640
in the setting. 
Brainstorm them to make sure 

585
00:37:47,720 --> 00:37:52,120
everybody understands what we're
delivering before you start into

586
00:37:52,120 --> 00:37:54,480
delivery. 
Andrew, is there any advice 

587
00:37:54,520 --> 00:37:56,880
you'd give about starting out 
with system syncing? 

588
00:37:58,880 --> 00:38:02,680
It's difficult for me because I,
I should say my, my educational 

589
00:38:02,680 --> 00:38:05,960
background makes, makes me think
in terms of systems anyway. 

590
00:38:05,960 --> 00:38:10,440
But the, the simple, simple 
thing I would say to people is 

591
00:38:11,080 --> 00:38:16,360
by the guide, by the guide we've
just issued, just published. 

592
00:38:16,360 --> 00:38:19,120
And it's, it's, it's in three 
parts. 

593
00:38:20,200 --> 00:38:24,320
Part A is meant to be read, read
through and it's, it's quite 

594
00:38:24,320 --> 00:38:27,720
short, quite easy to read and it
tells you about what, what 

595
00:38:27,720 --> 00:38:31,880
systems thinking is and why you 
should be interested in it as a 

596
00:38:31,880 --> 00:38:35,640
project manager. 
Part B is, is, is a reference 

597
00:38:35,640 --> 00:38:41,280
section written down by topics, 
topics that you can just dip 

598
00:38:41,280 --> 00:38:43,160
into. 
So when you're thinking about 

599
00:38:43,160 --> 00:38:47,840
that topic, you can read a few 
practical guides, suggested 

600
00:38:47,840 --> 00:38:53,000
tools to to apply, and then part
C, that is, it's a compendium of

601
00:38:53,000 --> 00:38:56,480
tools and techniques and 
references and where to find out

602
00:38:56,480 --> 00:39:00,880
more information. 
So we've got 20, at least 20 

603
00:39:00,880 --> 00:39:05,240
different tools and techniques 
in that, in that part C. 

604
00:39:05,680 --> 00:39:11,680
So that that's honestly, that's 
very simple advice how to get 

605
00:39:11,840 --> 00:39:14,160
into systems thinking by the 
guide. 

606
00:39:15,560 --> 00:39:17,280
What was the hardest thing, 
Cesar? 

607
00:39:17,280 --> 00:39:21,640
Because you put these into 
practise not that long ago and I

608
00:39:21,640 --> 00:39:24,600
wondered what would be the the 
hardest thing. 

609
00:39:24,600 --> 00:39:28,480
Some unexpectedly hard. 
For me, I think it's it's just 

610
00:39:28,480 --> 00:39:31,240
the initial perception of trying
to get it started. 

611
00:39:31,240 --> 00:39:34,560
You know, systems thinking can 
be confused of different things.

612
00:39:34,560 --> 00:39:38,440
You know, some in my earlier 
thinking, I thought it was 

613
00:39:38,440 --> 00:39:42,560
similar to systems engineering, 
the the more, more looking into 

614
00:39:42,840 --> 00:39:46,200
how the technical aspects of a 
project is verified and 

615
00:39:46,200 --> 00:39:49,600
validated, but actually it's 
actually a much broader than 

616
00:39:49,600 --> 00:39:52,520
that. 
So I think as you get deeper 

617
00:39:52,520 --> 00:39:56,360
into your understanding of what 
systems thinking is, you really 

618
00:39:56,360 --> 00:40:00,800
realise, you get, get realise 
how how how beneficial it is 

619
00:40:00,800 --> 00:40:03,440
from the wider function of a 
project manager. 

620
00:40:03,840 --> 00:40:07,640
I really. 
Encourage colleagues to to get 

621
00:40:08,280 --> 00:40:10,600
started and and start to apply 
it. 

622
00:40:11,520 --> 00:40:16,280
I myself still learning on on 
the subject, but I find it very 

623
00:40:16,280 --> 00:40:20,520
beneficial indeed. 
Can I Perhaps a good way to wrap

624
00:40:20,520 --> 00:40:23,360
up would be to ask each of you 
for the one key take away you'd 

625
00:40:23,360 --> 00:40:26,840
like listeners to go away with 
to think about redaction to take

626
00:40:26,840 --> 00:40:29,000
apart from buying a copy the 
guide obviously. 

627
00:40:29,600 --> 00:40:34,440
Andrew, would you like to start?
The takeaway is that you will be

628
00:40:34,440 --> 00:40:39,200
more successful as a project 
manager in in delivering 

629
00:40:39,200 --> 00:40:43,440
customer satisfaction if you 
think systemically, because you 

630
00:40:43,440 --> 00:40:46,600
will understand the problem to 
be solved better. 

631
00:40:46,760 --> 00:40:49,440
You will understand better how 
the solution is going to meet 

632
00:40:49,440 --> 00:40:55,360
that problem, and you will 
forecast and foresee unexpected 

633
00:40:55,360 --> 00:40:59,000
nasties that would rob you of 
success early enough to do 

634
00:40:59,000 --> 00:41:02,200
something about it. 
And who wouldn't want that? 

635
00:41:02,200 --> 00:41:03,400
That's fantastic. 
OK. 

636
00:41:03,880 --> 00:41:06,720
Esther, what would your key 
takeaway be? 

637
00:41:07,440 --> 00:41:11,640
I guess for me it's knowing that
system thinking in a project 

638
00:41:11,640 --> 00:41:15,920
delivery context is not just 
about tools and approaches and 

639
00:41:15,920 --> 00:41:21,960
methodologies, it's changing 
behaviours and mindsets and you 

640
00:41:21,960 --> 00:41:25,520
know, being being willing to 
take in more risk in the 

641
00:41:25,520 --> 00:41:29,160
uncertainty that is within a 
complex project environment. 

642
00:41:31,080 --> 00:41:33,760
And Caesar, what would be your 
closing thought? 

643
00:41:34,600 --> 00:41:40,320
Systems thinking is increasingly
becoming a recognised essential 

644
00:41:40,320 --> 00:41:44,160
skills for all project 
professionals in in fact, the 

645
00:41:44,160 --> 00:41:48,840
World Economic Forum 2025 
recognised systems thinking of 

646
00:41:48,840 --> 00:41:53,520
one of the core skills that 
companies in the 2030 should be 

647
00:41:53,960 --> 00:41:57,720
trying to have for for their 
employees. 

648
00:41:57,720 --> 00:42:00,480
So that's already recognised in 
the various the institutions 

649
00:42:00,480 --> 00:42:02,880
that I belong to, the 
institution of civil engineers 

650
00:42:03,280 --> 00:42:06,080
recognise that as well for 
practising engineers. 

651
00:42:06,560 --> 00:42:12,120
And so, you know, encourage you 
to get to know more about it. 

652
00:42:12,120 --> 00:42:16,640
Join us at the Interest Systems 
Thinking Interest Network in APM

653
00:42:18,120 --> 00:42:21,520
if you want to know more, 
because I think it it will. 

654
00:42:22,640 --> 00:42:25,680
I am convinced that we will help
you deliver projects 

655
00:42:25,680 --> 00:42:29,120
successfully. 
OK, well, listen, that just 

656
00:42:29,120 --> 00:42:32,560
leads me to thank each of you 
for your time and your very 

657
00:42:32,560 --> 00:42:35,200
valuable advice and thoughts 
around system syncing. 

658
00:42:35,480 --> 00:42:38,520
And I do urge everyone listening
to go and buy a guide today. 

659
00:42:38,760 --> 00:42:40,440
So thank you very much for your 
time. 

660
00:42:40,440 --> 00:42:42,880
Thanks again. 
Thank you. 

661
00:42:43,760 --> 00:42:45,800
Thank you, Emma. 
Hey, Emma. 

662
00:42:46,520 --> 00:42:49,720
Thanks again to Andrew Susan 
Esther for joining us and to you

663
00:42:49,720 --> 00:42:51,440
for listening to the APM 
Podcast. 

664
00:42:52,000 --> 00:42:54,480
If you'd like to buy a copy of 
the new guide, Doing the Right 

665
00:42:54,480 --> 00:42:58,600
Project Using System Syncing, to
select the right project, please

666
00:42:58,600 --> 00:43:03,840
go to 
theonlineapmbookshop@apm.org.uk/book

667
00:43:03,840 --> 00:43:07,440
Hyphen Shop. 
And don't forget to look out for

668
00:43:07,440 --> 00:43:09,320
more episodes or to rating 
reviewers. 

669
00:43:09,320 --> 00:43:12,480
Wherever you get your podcasts, 
we'd welcome you to get in touch

670
00:43:12,480 --> 00:43:15,640
with your comments, feedback and
suggestions by emailing us at 

671
00:43:15,880 --> 00:43:22,040
apmpodcast@thinkpublishing.co.uk.
And Spotify users, please do 

672
00:43:22,040 --> 00:43:25,480
also leave us your comments. 
This podcast has been brought to

673
00:43:25,480 --> 00:43:29,080
you by APM, the chartered body 
for the roject Rofession. 

674
00:43:29,680 --> 00:43:33,640
For more information on APM, 
visit apmorg.uk.

