1
00:00:08,440 --> 00:00:11,720
Welcome to the APM podcast. 
APM is the childhood body for 

2
00:00:11,720 --> 00:00:14,840
the project profession. 
My name is Emma DaVita and I'm 

3
00:00:14,840 --> 00:00:18,200
the editor of Project APM's 
quarterly journal and your host.

4
00:00:18,200 --> 00:00:22,560
In this podcast, I'm speaking to
Donna Sinnick, Chief Delivery 

5
00:00:22,560 --> 00:00:25,560
Officer at Babcock 
International, a defence, 

6
00:00:25,560 --> 00:00:29,560
aerospace and security company, 
about her rise to the top of the

7
00:00:29,560 --> 00:00:32,520
profession and the valuable 
career and project management 

8
00:00:32,520 --> 00:00:34,200
lessons she's learnt along the 
way. 

9
00:00:34,640 --> 00:00:37,480
Donna shares her advice on 
everything from creating 

10
00:00:37,480 --> 00:00:40,800
simplicity in programmes and 
projects, being a woman in a 

11
00:00:40,800 --> 00:00:44,040
male dominated environment and 
moving on from impostor 

12
00:00:44,040 --> 00:00:46,800
syndrome. 
Listen on to hear her story. 

13
00:00:50,760 --> 00:00:52,680
Welcome, Donna. 
Thanks so much for your time 

14
00:00:52,680 --> 00:00:57,360
today and big congratulations. 
New job role, Chief Delivery 

15
00:00:57,360 --> 00:00:59,600
Officer at Babcock 
International. 

16
00:00:59,600 --> 00:01:02,680
Congratulations. 
Thank you very, very much. 

17
00:01:03,560 --> 00:01:06,960
But why don't we begin with you 
telling us a bit about what you 

18
00:01:06,960 --> 00:01:10,040
do, so your kind of role and 
responsibilities and what kinds 

19
00:01:10,040 --> 00:01:11,960
of projects and programmes you 
work on? 

20
00:01:12,800 --> 00:01:16,320
So Babcock so I cover global 
Babcock. 

21
00:01:16,320 --> 00:01:20,760
So we've got footprint in in 
many countries across across the

22
00:01:20,760 --> 00:01:25,040
world, quite a strong footprint 
within the defence of the UK. 

23
00:01:25,320 --> 00:01:29,080
So my responsibilities when I 
first joined Babcock three years

24
00:01:29,080 --> 00:01:33,560
ago, it was to set up a global 
project management organisation.

25
00:01:33,800 --> 00:01:36,760
We already had around 2000 
project programme management 

26
00:01:36,760 --> 00:01:40,480
professionals, but kind of no 
one pulling it all together and 

27
00:01:40,680 --> 00:01:44,320
defining the single way for 
Babcock to move forwards. 

28
00:01:44,400 --> 00:01:47,200
Gosh, that's that's a lot of 
people to be working without a 

29
00:01:47,200 --> 00:01:49,600
kind of leader. 
Yeah, absolutely. 

30
00:01:49,600 --> 00:01:52,760
Absolutely, Yeah, so, so, so 
they've all got individual 

31
00:01:52,760 --> 00:01:54,920
business leaders. 
Obviously, as we, as we know, 

32
00:01:54,920 --> 00:01:57,120
within project and programme 
management, they tend to go up 

33
00:01:57,120 --> 00:01:59,840
through their business lines. 
But really looking for the 

34
00:01:59,840 --> 00:02:04,560
synergies and the frameworks and
how we think about competencies 

35
00:02:04,560 --> 00:02:08,560
and how we work across the 
organisation, kind of that free 

36
00:02:08,560 --> 00:02:11,720
flow of people and movement. 
Once you get anywhere near that 

37
00:02:11,720 --> 00:02:14,600
number of people, you get an 
awful lot of mobility and 

38
00:02:14,600 --> 00:02:18,240
people, people want to be able 
to get across the breadth of of 

39
00:02:18,240 --> 00:02:20,800
an organisation. 
So we just weren't capitalising 

40
00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:23,760
on it as much. 
So that was kind of what I came 

41
00:02:23,760 --> 00:02:27,080
in to start and do and obviously
either done something really 

42
00:02:27,080 --> 00:02:30,640
well or really badly because 
it's expanded and I've now got 

43
00:02:31,280 --> 00:02:33,160
quite a few other functions as 
well. 

44
00:02:33,160 --> 00:02:35,680
So quite a quite a number of 
other functional groups 

45
00:02:35,680 --> 00:02:40,960
including kind of procurement, 
supply chain, IT which is quite 

46
00:02:40,960 --> 00:02:42,920
an interesting one, particularly
from a project handling 

47
00:02:42,920 --> 00:02:46,400
perspective. 
Quality, which is always 

48
00:02:46,400 --> 00:02:50,880
fascinating to kind of get into 
the real sort of products, the 

49
00:02:50,880 --> 00:02:55,480
way that we run the business and
also facilities management, 

50
00:02:55,480 --> 00:02:58,200
which is again something 
completely different. 

51
00:02:58,200 --> 00:03:02,160
But for me, I think the 
grounding in project management 

52
00:03:02,160 --> 00:03:06,200
is what absolutely sets a 
foundation for everything. 

53
00:03:06,200 --> 00:03:09,760
So as long as you've got that, 
that ability to understand and 

54
00:03:09,760 --> 00:03:13,200
question and pull apart what 
you're being told and what you 

55
00:03:13,200 --> 00:03:16,600
understand and kind of ask 
hopefully intelligent questions,

56
00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:19,400
sometimes probably not so 
intelligent after the obvious 

57
00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:22,600
questions, I think you can 
pretty much turn your hand to 

58
00:03:22,600 --> 00:03:25,840
most things. 
Are you able to tell us a bit 

59
00:03:25,840 --> 00:03:28,400
about the kinds of projects or 
programmes you're working on at 

60
00:03:28,400 --> 00:03:31,360
the moment? 
So full range of projects and 

61
00:03:31,360 --> 00:03:34,120
programmes. 
So I spend a lot of time. 

62
00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:38,680
So I sponsor one of our major 
programmes at a dockyard down on

63
00:03:38,680 --> 00:03:41,240
the South Coast. 
So it's spent get some 

64
00:03:41,240 --> 00:03:45,720
fascinating insights. 
I'm able to really sponsor them 

65
00:03:45,720 --> 00:03:49,360
because the project and 
programme management profession 

66
00:03:49,360 --> 00:03:53,160
and the customer are getting 
much more sort of intelligent 

67
00:03:53,160 --> 00:03:55,400
and understanding what a 
sponsor's really there for. 

68
00:03:55,520 --> 00:03:59,320
So that's fascinating because I 
get to work with the Royal Navy,

69
00:03:59,320 --> 00:04:02,880
with some ship staff, with 
obviously the Babcock personnel 

70
00:04:02,880 --> 00:04:05,880
and a number of other 
professional industry 

71
00:04:05,880 --> 00:04:09,280
organisations. 
So that's more around the 

72
00:04:09,280 --> 00:04:13,880
programme sponsorship side of a 
major critical national 

73
00:04:14,160 --> 00:04:20,040
endeavour and then move into. 
So sometimes on ships, sometimes

74
00:04:20,040 --> 00:04:24,040
on aircraft, sometimes in the 
the civil space. 

75
00:04:24,040 --> 00:04:27,720
But yeah, it's, it's, but you 
could probably think of 

76
00:04:27,720 --> 00:04:30,600
something and somewhere in the 
portfolio we'd cover it. 

77
00:04:30,600 --> 00:04:35,240
So Met Police training or the 
London Fire Brigade or some, you

78
00:04:35,240 --> 00:04:39,200
know, there's a whole range of, 
of projects and programmes and 

79
00:04:39,200 --> 00:04:43,720
business areas that we, that we 
run and, and I'm in a fantastic 

80
00:04:43,720 --> 00:04:46,160
place to be able to kind of get 
involved in all of them. 

81
00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:51,000
What attracted you to Babcock 
when you first joined and what 

82
00:04:51,000 --> 00:04:53,920
have you enjoyed doing look 
forward to when you get up in 

83
00:04:53,920 --> 00:04:56,560
the morning? 
So I grew up in a military 

84
00:04:56,560 --> 00:04:59,240
family. 
Both of my parents were in were 

85
00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:01,880
in the services. 
So it's kind of the way that I 

86
00:05:01,880 --> 00:05:05,240
grew up in that way. 
I grew up moving around the 

87
00:05:05,240 --> 00:05:08,440
world with them and sometimes 
not moving with them when I went

88
00:05:08,440 --> 00:05:11,400
off to off to boarding school 
for a little while just to 

89
00:05:11,720 --> 00:05:14,040
towards the latter part of my 
school years. 

90
00:05:14,440 --> 00:05:18,040
So I've spent my entire career, 
I'm merely working in the 

91
00:05:18,040 --> 00:05:22,480
defence business. 
So I spent 24 years working on 

92
00:05:22,480 --> 00:05:25,840
military aircraft before I made 
the decision to come over to 

93
00:05:25,840 --> 00:05:29,440
Babcock. 
But again, it's it's kind of all

94
00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:31,960
in the same, along the same 
vein. 

95
00:05:32,240 --> 00:05:36,240
What is it about that world that
you enjoy and that you've wanted

96
00:05:36,240 --> 00:05:40,120
to kind of forge your career in?
I would describe it a little bit

97
00:05:40,120 --> 00:05:42,800
like project management. 
I think it's almost literally in

98
00:05:42,800 --> 00:05:46,080
my DNA. 
So what Why do you know? 

99
00:05:46,080 --> 00:05:48,960
I grew up, I knew no different. 
I grew up moving about. 

100
00:05:48,960 --> 00:05:52,640
I grew up in a world where 
everyone was in service of, of 

101
00:05:52,640 --> 00:05:57,240
the, of the country and my kind 
of same as project management. 

102
00:05:57,240 --> 00:05:59,400
It's kind of in your DNA. 
It's just something that you 

103
00:05:59,800 --> 00:06:02,800
that I found that just really 
falls naturally and I feel 

104
00:06:02,800 --> 00:06:06,560
really privileged to be able to 
work in a defence organisation. 

105
00:06:06,640 --> 00:06:10,440
So, yeah, so, so I'm not sure I 
ever chose to do it. 

106
00:06:10,480 --> 00:06:14,440
I think I just kind of continued
on from I guess a lot of people 

107
00:06:14,440 --> 00:06:17,280
do, don't they, they, you know, 
they follow in their, in the 

108
00:06:17,800 --> 00:06:21,240
footsteps of their, of their 
parents and their family and, 

109
00:06:21,440 --> 00:06:24,600
and mine is, is very different. 
So I never joined the services 

110
00:06:25,240 --> 00:06:28,560
but I do work, you know, within,
within the UK defence. 

111
00:06:29,120 --> 00:06:30,760
How did you get into project 
management? 

112
00:06:31,280 --> 00:06:34,160
Did you always wanted to be want
to become a project manager? 

113
00:06:34,160 --> 00:06:37,680
I hear very few people say they 
that's their dream. 

114
00:06:38,360 --> 00:06:40,720
That's kind of what I mean when 
I say I think it's part of your 

115
00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:43,720
DNA. 
So I joined, I joined a company 

116
00:06:43,800 --> 00:06:47,840
and do you know the moment I 
remember being asked to go into 

117
00:06:47,840 --> 00:06:49,840
project management. 
I don't think project management

118
00:06:49,840 --> 00:06:54,640
was particularly big or sexy at 
all at the time. 

119
00:06:55,240 --> 00:06:59,360
So it was probably it was 25 
years plus ago. 

120
00:06:59,360 --> 00:07:03,000
If we if we start there. 
And I just remember having some 

121
00:07:03,000 --> 00:07:06,560
challenges between the customer,
the contract and the, and the 

122
00:07:06,560 --> 00:07:11,080
production, the operations team 
and I just drew out a fairly 

123
00:07:11,080 --> 00:07:15,640
basic flow of work that we 
needed to do and just trying to 

124
00:07:15,640 --> 00:07:18,400
get pull everyone together and 
say this is the flow of the work

125
00:07:18,400 --> 00:07:19,680
we need to do. 
Does everyone agree? 

126
00:07:19,880 --> 00:07:22,800
And suddenly I was the bee's 
knees of project management. 

127
00:07:22,800 --> 00:07:27,200
So it's that's kind of that's 
the first moment that I remember

128
00:07:27,200 --> 00:07:30,760
someone saying to me to almost 
do you want to move into project

129
00:07:30,760 --> 00:07:31,520
management? 
We don't. 

130
00:07:31,640 --> 00:07:36,720
We've kind of got a few people 
who are project managers, but it

131
00:07:36,720 --> 00:07:38,800
is an area that we really want 
to grow. 

132
00:07:39,040 --> 00:07:43,480
And so I obviously jumped to the
chance because the ability to 

133
00:07:43,480 --> 00:07:48,280
have a high level view of lots 
and lots of different complex 

134
00:07:48,960 --> 00:07:52,680
projects, programmes, people. 
So I've always worked in a, in a

135
00:07:52,680 --> 00:07:59,000
big engineering organisations. 
So the ability to kind of stay 

136
00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:03,200
at surface level but understand 
what it is and how you pull it 

137
00:08:03,200 --> 00:08:05,440
all together just always really 
interested me. 

138
00:08:05,440 --> 00:08:08,000
And I think it's just just kind 
of growing from there. 

139
00:08:08,840 --> 00:08:11,720
I wanted to ask you about the 
challenges that you face and the

140
00:08:11,720 --> 00:08:14,800
work that you do and that you 
obviously enjoy getting to grips

141
00:08:14,800 --> 00:08:18,800
with, and inevitably one of 
those things must be complexity.

142
00:08:19,400 --> 00:08:22,120
I think the whole point of 
project management is to 

143
00:08:22,120 --> 00:08:25,280
overcome the complexity. 
I'm a massive believer in 

144
00:08:25,280 --> 00:08:29,600
simplification, so if I can't 
describe something in the 

145
00:08:29,600 --> 00:08:33,120
simplest possible way for 
whoever I'm talking to to 

146
00:08:33,120 --> 00:08:36,320
understand, it probably means I 
haven't quite unpicked it enough

147
00:08:36,320 --> 00:08:40,440
to be able to describe it. 
So I probably go the absolute 

148
00:08:40,440 --> 00:08:45,240
opposite way to to other people 
where I look for the simplest 

149
00:08:45,240 --> 00:08:49,880
possible version and the 
simplest way of understanding 

150
00:08:49,880 --> 00:08:51,720
something. 
Because I think you can really 

151
00:08:51,920 --> 00:08:55,680
get under the skin of complex 
problems and stitch things 

152
00:08:55,680 --> 00:08:58,880
together. 
Not not trying to do any 

153
00:08:59,680 --> 00:09:04,400
discredit to complex situations,
but just trying to say what is 

154
00:09:04,400 --> 00:09:06,600
the simplest way that we can 
think about this? 

155
00:09:06,600 --> 00:09:10,280
Because the simpler we can make 
things, the more people 

156
00:09:10,280 --> 00:09:12,440
understand and therefore the 
more you can get behind the 

157
00:09:12,440 --> 00:09:15,600
cause and the more you can get 
people kind of pointing in the 

158
00:09:15,600 --> 00:09:17,840
right direction. 
Which personally I think is the 

159
00:09:17,880 --> 00:09:22,320
biggest challenge of project 
management is how do you get, 

160
00:09:22,400 --> 00:09:25,240
you know, huge projects and 
programmes where we can be 

161
00:09:25,240 --> 00:09:27,720
working on projects and 
programmes with, you know, 

162
00:09:27,760 --> 00:09:30,320
thousands of people. 
How do you get them to 

163
00:09:30,320 --> 00:09:32,920
understand in the simplest 
possible way? 

164
00:09:33,040 --> 00:09:36,240
Sometimes it is by describing 
things in the simplest possible 

165
00:09:36,240 --> 00:09:40,080
way. 
So, so that's how I have always 

166
00:09:40,160 --> 00:09:44,880
addressed things and tried to 
think about complex issues and 

167
00:09:44,880 --> 00:09:50,080
complex programmes whilst 
respecting and really trying to 

168
00:09:50,080 --> 00:09:53,760
unpick the specialisms. 
Because there's no doubt that 

169
00:09:53,760 --> 00:09:57,600
there's huge complexities, but 
it doesn't mean that everyone in

170
00:09:57,640 --> 00:10:00,360
in the project or programme or 
the organisation has to 

171
00:10:00,360 --> 00:10:02,480
understand them in in a level of
detail. 

172
00:10:02,800 --> 00:10:06,960
So how do you pull it apart 
enough that people understand 

173
00:10:06,960 --> 00:10:09,960
point in the right direction, 
but you still allow space for 

174
00:10:09,960 --> 00:10:14,280
the specialist to really kind of
drive their technical or their 

175
00:10:14,480 --> 00:10:18,920
commercial or whatever, whatever
specialism it is to allow them 

176
00:10:18,920 --> 00:10:22,120
to drive forwards? 
Have you got any advice to 

177
00:10:22,120 --> 00:10:25,120
anyone who might be listening 
who thinks you know what? 

178
00:10:25,120 --> 00:10:29,120
I want to try and make the way I
talk about projects to my team 

179
00:10:29,680 --> 00:10:31,560
simpler? 
What have you picked up along 

180
00:10:31,560 --> 00:10:36,360
the way? 
I think honesty and humility is 

181
00:10:36,360 --> 00:10:40,680
just really underrated. 
So to be able to say somewhat to

182
00:10:40,680 --> 00:10:46,560
somebody, I really respect your 
detailed subject matter 

183
00:10:46,560 --> 00:10:51,840
knowledge, but actually that is 
your role and my role's 

184
00:10:51,840 --> 00:10:54,920
different. 
My role is to be able to stitch 

185
00:10:54,960 --> 00:10:57,920
and pull together an 
organisation or a project or 

186
00:10:57,920 --> 00:11:02,840
programme so that we enable you 
and actually the level of 

187
00:11:02,840 --> 00:11:05,840
conversation that we're having 
or the depth of the conversation

188
00:11:05,840 --> 00:11:07,680
or the acronyms that you're 
using. 

189
00:11:07,680 --> 00:11:11,040
We, I live in a heavy acronym 
world and you can get to the end

190
00:11:11,040 --> 00:11:14,640
of a presentation and think, if 
I were an outsider, I'm not sure

191
00:11:14,640 --> 00:11:16,640
I would have understood any of 
that. 

192
00:11:17,040 --> 00:11:21,560
If we can just respect the 
position of each of the people 

193
00:11:21,560 --> 00:11:25,160
in the team, but have them 
respect kind of what your role 

194
00:11:25,160 --> 00:11:28,840
is, I think that's a massive 
learning point for for the 

195
00:11:28,840 --> 00:11:31,360
project. 
That would be what I would say 

196
00:11:31,360 --> 00:11:35,080
to all kind of project 
management professionals, 

197
00:11:35,080 --> 00:11:37,480
respect the SME's. 
Don't try and be the SME. 

198
00:11:37,480 --> 00:11:40,600
You don't have to be the 
engineer or the commercial 

199
00:11:40,600 --> 00:11:43,400
contract manager. 
You need all of those people, 

200
00:11:43,400 --> 00:11:45,120
but you actually need 
simplification. 

201
00:11:45,120 --> 00:11:46,360
You need to get under the skin 
event. 

202
00:11:46,360 --> 00:11:50,880
So being able to say, quite 
honestly, thank you, but we need

203
00:11:50,880 --> 00:11:53,920
to raise this up a level because
this is this is kind of your, 

204
00:11:54,200 --> 00:11:56,400
your responsibility rather than 
mine. 

205
00:11:56,400 --> 00:11:58,640
And I'm here to enable you. 
But that means I have to 

206
00:11:58,640 --> 00:12:02,160
understand it and I have to be 
able to get that message across 

207
00:12:02,160 --> 00:12:04,720
to everybody. 
Are there any other challenges 

208
00:12:04,720 --> 00:12:07,720
that you regularly face in your 
work that you think you've 

209
00:12:07,720 --> 00:12:11,000
learned a lot about how to deal 
with well that you could pass 

210
00:12:11,000 --> 00:12:14,320
some advice on? 
Maybe on the people's side of 

211
00:12:14,320 --> 00:12:17,480
things, perhaps. 
I love getting into an 

212
00:12:17,480 --> 00:12:23,160
organisation and finding those 
secret little ninjas that are in

213
00:12:23,160 --> 00:12:25,800
the organisation that are almost
buried. 

214
00:12:26,960 --> 00:12:33,160
And I think the ability to step 
back and recognise not everyone 

215
00:12:33,160 --> 00:12:37,320
has to go up a classical kind of
hierarchical step by step route.

216
00:12:37,520 --> 00:12:41,360
Sometimes there are people for 
whatever reason who are buried 

217
00:12:41,360 --> 00:12:45,560
in the organisation who are 
ready to be picked out and and 

218
00:12:45,760 --> 00:12:49,880
kind of elevated really quickly.
And I, I did that in one of one 

219
00:12:49,880 --> 00:12:53,240
of the most complex programmes 
I've ever worked in and run. 

220
00:12:53,360 --> 00:12:59,960
It was an aerospace defence 
contract with multiple customers

221
00:13:00,200 --> 00:13:05,960
right at the time where the 737 
Max incidents were happening. 

222
00:13:05,960 --> 00:13:09,200
And obviously, you know, 
horrendous outcome. 

223
00:13:09,760 --> 00:13:12,760
So we were dealing with a couple
of organisations who were 

224
00:13:12,760 --> 00:13:15,480
directly involved and directly 
related with that. 

225
00:13:15,480 --> 00:13:19,560
So you've got an organisation 
who are already quite concerned 

226
00:13:19,880 --> 00:13:23,400
and quite anxious and obviously 
dealing with things that none of

227
00:13:23,400 --> 00:13:27,240
us would ever want to deal with.
But I, I picked up that 

228
00:13:27,240 --> 00:13:31,880
programme when actually, and 
it's, it's one of my, I think 

229
00:13:31,880 --> 00:13:33,920
now pivotal moments in my 
career. 

230
00:13:33,920 --> 00:13:38,280
So my boss at the time had said 
to me, I'd really like you to 

231
00:13:38,280 --> 00:13:41,880
run this programme. 
And at the time I was running a 

232
00:13:41,880 --> 00:13:46,120
portfolio, I was absolutely 
loving my job had multiple kind 

233
00:13:46,120 --> 00:13:51,120
of Tier 1 aerospace customers 
and I kind of, and everyone 

234
00:13:51,120 --> 00:13:55,400
who'd been in this programme had
had not finished it very well 

235
00:13:55,400 --> 00:13:58,640
and it kind of there, they'd had
a really, really tough time. 

236
00:13:58,640 --> 00:14:02,360
So I said, thank you for the 
opportunity, but I'm good, I'm 

237
00:14:02,360 --> 00:14:06,120
going to stick here. 
So he asked me twice and I said 

238
00:14:06,120 --> 00:14:09,840
no both times. 
And now I remember so clearly. 

239
00:14:10,160 --> 00:14:14,480
He sat down in my office. 
He said, I've asked you twice 

240
00:14:14,480 --> 00:14:18,520
and now I'm telling you. 
And I thought, OK, right then 

241
00:14:18,680 --> 00:14:21,400
that's what that's what's coming
next. 

242
00:14:21,720 --> 00:14:27,280
But it's it's probably one of my
biggest lessons is sometimes 

243
00:14:27,280 --> 00:14:30,960
opportunities come even if you 
don't see it as an opportunity. 

244
00:14:31,480 --> 00:14:35,320
So I didn't want that role. 
I was in a fantastic world. 

245
00:14:35,320 --> 00:14:37,880
I was loving my job. 
I was loving the team that I was

246
00:14:37,880 --> 00:14:41,640
working with all the way through
the customer, the supply chain. 

247
00:14:41,760 --> 00:14:46,440
But I was this moment of no, we 
need you to go and do this. 

248
00:14:46,640 --> 00:14:49,560
That I thought at that moment 
was pretty catastrophic, 

249
00:14:50,200 --> 00:14:52,800
actually became one of my 
proudest moments and one of my 

250
00:14:52,800 --> 00:14:55,480
pivotal moments. 
And to be honest, I wouldn't be 

251
00:14:55,480 --> 00:14:58,640
at Babcock now if it wasn't for 
that because the level of 

252
00:14:58,640 --> 00:15:04,240
confidence that it gave me, 
having said no and then and then

253
00:15:04,240 --> 00:15:07,400
moving into a role and 
rebuilding basically a 

254
00:15:07,400 --> 00:15:11,360
completely fractured team, none 
of whom wanted to be in that 

255
00:15:11,360 --> 00:15:13,560
programme. 
Really, really tough 

256
00:15:13,560 --> 00:15:17,560
relationships internally and 
with the customer and just being

257
00:15:17,560 --> 00:15:21,720
able to kind of find those 
superstars that are hidden in in

258
00:15:21,720 --> 00:15:26,560
that organisation, being able to
pull them out, restructure and 

259
00:15:26,560 --> 00:15:29,720
then drive the programme 
forwards with that kind of let's

260
00:15:29,720 --> 00:15:32,280
simplify it. 
Let's all be able to talk in 

261
00:15:32,280 --> 00:15:35,280
this in a similar way. 
Let's be able to point in the 

262
00:15:35,280 --> 00:15:38,240
same direction because 
fundamentally, what do we all 

263
00:15:38,240 --> 00:15:40,120
want? 
We want this programme to end. 

264
00:15:40,520 --> 00:15:44,480
So let's drive it to the end. 
And it was just from a moment of

265
00:15:44,480 --> 00:15:48,120
saying thank you, but I really 
don't want that to, OK, that's 

266
00:15:48,200 --> 00:15:51,600
the direction we're travelling 
in and, and grabbing hold of it 

267
00:15:51,600 --> 00:15:53,680
and saying if this is the 
direction we're going, that's 

268
00:15:53,680 --> 00:15:56,200
what we're going to do. 
Do you think that was the lesson

269
00:15:56,200 --> 00:15:59,480
in going beyond your comfort 
zone so someone knew you well 

270
00:15:59,480 --> 00:16:01,960
enough to push you and say yes, 
you can do that? 

271
00:16:02,640 --> 00:16:08,800
100 percent, 100% and it all it 
was also a lesson in I think it 

272
00:16:08,800 --> 00:16:11,800
was a lesson in saying no 
initially, to be honest, because

273
00:16:11,800 --> 00:16:15,680
I'm not sure at any point I had 
previously said thank you very 

274
00:16:15,680 --> 00:16:18,800
much, but I'm I that programme 
doesn't feel right for me. 

275
00:16:18,800 --> 00:16:19,000
I. 
Mean. 

276
00:16:19,000 --> 00:16:21,720
That's a brave thing to do. 
That's a brave thing to say to 

277
00:16:21,720 --> 00:16:24,160
your boss. 
No, I don't want you to do what 

278
00:16:24,160 --> 00:16:28,440
you. 
Do but so yes, exactly. 

279
00:16:28,440 --> 00:16:32,080
I think the point is you can say
no, you don't have to take every

280
00:16:32,080 --> 00:16:35,560
opportunity. 
But if it gets to a point where 

281
00:16:35,560 --> 00:16:40,320
the business needs you to take a
role or to go in a direction, my

282
00:16:40,320 --> 00:16:44,080
advice would be at that point, 
go for it because you never 

283
00:16:44,080 --> 00:16:47,120
know. 
All of the reasons I didn't want

284
00:16:47,120 --> 00:16:50,000
to take that role. 
Actually, I now look back on and

285
00:16:50,000 --> 00:16:54,960
think, wow, they were either 
confidence building or pivotal 

286
00:16:54,960 --> 00:16:58,560
moments in my career to the 
point where when, when that 

287
00:16:58,560 --> 00:17:03,160
programme did end, which which 
took three years for us to take 

288
00:17:03,160 --> 00:17:06,640
that programme over the line. 
The number of people who still 

289
00:17:06,640 --> 00:17:11,319
say today I really miss that 
programme, but what they miss is

290
00:17:11,319 --> 00:17:15,960
the team spirit of it because we
were just able to turn and 

291
00:17:15,960 --> 00:17:18,680
direct and really drive it all 
in the same way. 

292
00:17:18,760 --> 00:17:20,839
Yes, I get that. 
It must have been quite. 

293
00:17:20,839 --> 00:17:23,599
I mean, it must have been very 
daunting, but exciting as well. 

294
00:17:24,119 --> 00:17:27,880
So it was daunting, but it also 
also, I guess, I guess it was 

295
00:17:27,880 --> 00:17:30,640
quite flattering if I'm just 
really honest, because you go 

296
00:17:30,680 --> 00:17:35,680
right, OK, Someone has actually 
actively not not only asked me, 

297
00:17:35,680 --> 00:17:39,640
but now told me that this role 
that I'm going to be doing, so 

298
00:17:39,640 --> 00:17:42,480
they must have great confidence 
in my ability to do it. 

299
00:17:42,920 --> 00:17:47,080
So all of that kind of, I 
actually don't necessarily agree

300
00:17:47,080 --> 00:17:50,680
with imposter syndrome, but all 
of that kind of concern in your 

301
00:17:50,680 --> 00:17:54,840
head, just you're able to switch
off and say I wouldn't be doing 

302
00:17:54,840 --> 00:17:59,040
this role if this person, this 
organisation didn't believe I 

303
00:17:59,040 --> 00:18:02,080
could do it. 
I wanted to ask you about the 

304
00:18:02,080 --> 00:18:05,760
style of leadership you have as 
a programme leader. 

305
00:18:05,960 --> 00:18:12,160
Have you consciously cultivate 
the style of leadership, or have

306
00:18:12,160 --> 00:18:15,720
you just found yourself leading 
in a natural way for you? 

307
00:18:15,720 --> 00:18:16,280
What? 
What? 

308
00:18:16,280 --> 00:18:20,560
What way would that be? 
I think probably more the latter

309
00:18:20,600 --> 00:18:23,120
because do you think you have to
be honest to yourself? 

310
00:18:23,120 --> 00:18:27,560
I remember quite early in my 
career, someone said you're not 

311
00:18:27,560 --> 00:18:30,560
hard enough, you're not direct 
enough, You're not, you know, 

312
00:18:30,920 --> 00:18:33,320
they would describe it as 
holding people to account. 

313
00:18:33,320 --> 00:18:37,320
I think what they meant when I 
look back, it's kind of shouty 

314
00:18:37,320 --> 00:18:40,920
and direct and everything that 
I'm not. 

315
00:18:41,320 --> 00:18:47,480
So, so I remember for about a 
month trying to be someone 

316
00:18:47,600 --> 00:18:51,960
really different to who I am. 
And I got to the end of the 

317
00:18:51,960 --> 00:18:53,760
month because it was really 
conscious. 

318
00:18:53,760 --> 00:18:56,200
Right. 
OK, I'll take the advice. 

319
00:18:56,520 --> 00:18:57,960
And I was, I was a project 
manager. 

320
00:18:57,960 --> 00:19:01,520
I was managing around about 50 
engineers at the time. 

321
00:19:01,960 --> 00:19:06,080
I'll take the advice. 
I'll think about how I show up 

322
00:19:06,080 --> 00:19:09,840
every day, and I do remember 
being this kind of really 

323
00:19:09,840 --> 00:19:17,240
direct, really almost forceful, 
loud person for about for a 

324
00:19:17,240 --> 00:19:20,280
month, which was what I'd set 
myself to really test it. 

325
00:19:20,720 --> 00:19:24,440
I got to the end of that month 
and I just thought, even if this

326
00:19:24,440 --> 00:19:28,280
is working, I am utterly 
miserable because it's not me. 

327
00:19:29,520 --> 00:19:33,040
And from that moment and it was 
quite an early career learning 

328
00:19:33,040 --> 00:19:36,880
for me and and I'm not saying 
it's right or wrong, but for me 

329
00:19:36,880 --> 00:19:38,880
personally, it didn't, it didn't
work. 

330
00:19:39,080 --> 00:19:43,480
So I've always found that just 
like if someone shouts at me, if

331
00:19:43,480 --> 00:19:49,440
someone kind of directs me and 
tells me, tells me what to do 

332
00:19:49,440 --> 00:19:53,040
rather than kind of seeks 
opinion or I've no issue with 

333
00:19:53,040 --> 00:19:57,120
being direct. 
But there's a different way in 

334
00:19:57,120 --> 00:19:59,920
style. 
And I think certainly for 

335
00:19:59,920 --> 00:20:02,520
project management, your job is 
to get the best out of people. 

336
00:20:02,520 --> 00:20:05,520
And you don't tend to get the 
best out of people if, if you 

337
00:20:05,520 --> 00:20:09,240
are forceful direct, if you're 
always telling them what to do, 

338
00:20:09,240 --> 00:20:11,960
there's only a certain number of
people who like that style. 

339
00:20:12,520 --> 00:20:17,440
So I've just, I think I've more 
naturally moved to what what's 

340
00:20:17,440 --> 00:20:21,240
core to me, but I have tested it
along the way and found that 

341
00:20:21,520 --> 00:20:24,160
certainly other styles don't 
necessarily suit me. 

342
00:20:25,840 --> 00:20:29,440
We're APM, the only chartered 
membership organisation for the 

343
00:20:29,440 --> 00:20:32,760
project profession. 
When you become an APM member, 

344
00:20:32,800 --> 00:20:35,320
you'll receive the resources and
support you need to make an 

345
00:20:35,320 --> 00:20:38,720
impact, delivering better 
projects with better outcomes. 

346
00:20:39,160 --> 00:20:42,280
Plus, you'll access exclusive 
training and benefits to support

347
00:20:42,280 --> 00:20:45,600
your ongoing career development.
Find out how we can help you 

348
00:20:45,600 --> 00:20:49,400
reach your potential by visiting
apm.org.uk. 

349
00:20:50,080 --> 00:20:53,440
Because when projects succeed, 
society benefits. 

350
00:20:55,880 --> 00:20:59,480
I wanted to ask you what have 
been the biggest lessons around 

351
00:20:59,480 --> 00:21:03,440
the actual execution projects, 
so project management side of 

352
00:21:03,440 --> 00:21:06,080
things that you've learned as 
you've climbed up the ladder 

353
00:21:06,240 --> 00:21:08,800
that you wish you'd told a 
younger version of yourself? 

354
00:21:10,000 --> 00:21:15,280
So I think the first would be 
trust the data, build the data, 

355
00:21:15,280 --> 00:21:19,520
trust the data. 
So I know so through lots of 

356
00:21:19,520 --> 00:21:22,760
different psychometric profiles 
that I've had the pleasure of 

357
00:21:22,760 --> 00:21:28,960
doing over the years, I know 
that in certain situations I, I 

358
00:21:28,960 --> 00:21:34,440
can be pretty decisive, I can 
move very quickly, but in a, in 

359
00:21:34,440 --> 00:21:37,400
a really, really difficult 
situation, I tend to move 

360
00:21:37,400 --> 00:21:39,520
straight back to the centre and 
go into data. 

361
00:21:39,640 --> 00:21:45,080
So as long as you're measuring 
and monitoring and appropriately

362
00:21:45,080 --> 00:21:49,040
and correctly it, it's, it's got
no reason to lie, It's not lying

363
00:21:49,040 --> 00:21:50,960
to you. 
So if something under the 

364
00:21:50,960 --> 00:21:54,800
surface is telling you that 
there is an issue, there's a 

365
00:21:54,800 --> 00:21:57,440
problem. 
You do need to dig into it. 

366
00:21:57,440 --> 00:22:00,960
So I'd say trust the data and 
secondly, don't put it off. 

367
00:22:01,040 --> 00:22:05,440
It is, it is not going to get 
any better by ignoring it or by 

368
00:22:05,440 --> 00:22:08,040
putting it off. 
And sometimes that comes into 

369
00:22:08,040 --> 00:22:10,720
the prioritisation. 
So we do an awful lot with 

370
00:22:11,080 --> 00:22:14,360
rocks, pebbles, sand. 
So we fill our time with sand, 

371
00:22:14,360 --> 00:22:18,240
which is kind of the day-to-day 
stuff that just has to be done. 

372
00:22:18,760 --> 00:22:22,120
But if you start with that, 
you've got no time left really 

373
00:22:22,120 --> 00:22:27,240
to drive the rocks. 
The big strategic changes that 

374
00:22:27,240 --> 00:22:30,000
you need to get into your 
programme, into your project, 

375
00:22:30,000 --> 00:22:33,520
into your business. 
What's your next ambition for 

376
00:22:33,520 --> 00:22:36,400
your career? 
Or do you have a dream job 

377
00:22:36,400 --> 00:22:39,680
you're willing to share with us?
Do I have a dream job? 

378
00:22:40,800 --> 00:22:47,400
So I've maybe controversially, 
I've always just, I've never had

379
00:22:47,400 --> 00:22:51,280
a career plan as it were like 
within two years I want to be 

380
00:22:51,280 --> 00:22:53,360
this, within five years I want 
to be that. 

381
00:22:53,600 --> 00:22:58,600
I think I've, I've always just 
believed if you work hard and 

382
00:22:58,600 --> 00:23:03,120
you're kind of true to the core 
of you and you've got great 

383
00:23:03,120 --> 00:23:09,680
sponsorship and allyship, then 
certainly what I've found is 

384
00:23:10,160 --> 00:23:14,440
that opportunities come up and 
they might not, they might not 

385
00:23:14,440 --> 00:23:17,920
appear to be opportunities. 
So I did 24 years at my last 

386
00:23:18,280 --> 00:23:24,040
organisation and was probably no
doubt classified as a lifer, but

387
00:23:24,040 --> 00:23:29,200
an opportunity came up to move 
and to move over to over to 

388
00:23:29,200 --> 00:23:33,560
Babcock. 
And I think it, it's, that was 

389
00:23:33,560 --> 00:23:36,480
less of a choice at that moment.
It was just in that moment in 

390
00:23:36,480 --> 00:23:39,920
time, an opportunity came and 
kind of decide whether or not 

391
00:23:39,920 --> 00:23:43,840
that's the right, the right 
chance to take for you. 

392
00:23:45,000 --> 00:23:48,760
So picking up, I mean, person 
picking up IT and procurement 

393
00:23:48,760 --> 00:23:52,200
and supply chain and some of the
other kind of aspects and 

394
00:23:52,200 --> 00:23:55,960
strings that I've now got within
My Portfolio of delivery. 

395
00:23:56,200 --> 00:23:59,040
And would they have been on a 
career plan for me? 

396
00:23:59,080 --> 00:24:05,320
No, but what's happened is it it
kind of stabilise and and get do

397
00:24:05,320 --> 00:24:08,680
something really, really well 
and then more, more 

398
00:24:08,680 --> 00:24:11,200
opportunities come along. 
So I think being kind of 

399
00:24:11,200 --> 00:24:15,320
flexible and open to take them 
has been the way that I've kind 

400
00:24:15,320 --> 00:24:18,320
of gone through my career as 
opposed to a quite a set 

401
00:24:19,880 --> 00:24:22,600
direction of travel. 
So do I have the next stream 

402
00:24:22,600 --> 00:24:26,120
job? 
I generally like to think that 

403
00:24:26,120 --> 00:24:31,320
my, my job at the moment, 
whatever it is, if I do it 

404
00:24:31,320 --> 00:24:35,480
exceptionally well, if I really 
drive into it, then the next 

405
00:24:35,480 --> 00:24:39,040
dream job will come up. 
So it's, it's quite a difficult 

406
00:24:39,040 --> 00:24:43,760
one to answer without a really 
direct statement, but that 

407
00:24:43,840 --> 00:24:46,840
that's how I found, that's how I
found my career kind of 

408
00:24:46,840 --> 00:24:49,920
progress. 
Is there anything else you 

409
00:24:50,480 --> 00:24:52,600
wanted to mention before we 
finish? 

410
00:24:52,600 --> 00:24:56,840
Any bits of advice you pass on 
to maybe people just starting 

411
00:24:56,840 --> 00:24:59,320
out in their careers in project 
management or anything else you 

412
00:24:59,320 --> 00:25:02,360
wanted to raise? 
I think people starting out in 

413
00:25:02,360 --> 00:25:04,480
their careers in project 
management, I think my biggest 

414
00:25:04,800 --> 00:25:09,080
piece of advice would be maybe a
little cautious here actually in

415
00:25:09,080 --> 00:25:14,640
my advice, don't be so fixated 
on moving quickly. 

416
00:25:15,000 --> 00:25:19,560
Because actually what I don't 
think people want to do is move 

417
00:25:19,560 --> 00:25:22,840
so quickly that they don't learn
the lessons along the way. 

418
00:25:22,840 --> 00:25:25,560
Because you'll get to a certain 
level in your career where you 

419
00:25:25,560 --> 00:25:28,120
can't backfill that knowledge 
and that and that level of 

420
00:25:28,120 --> 00:25:31,960
experience. 
So certainly the way project 

421
00:25:31,960 --> 00:25:35,560
controls are moving and the and 
the measures that we put in 

422
00:25:35,560 --> 00:25:40,000
place around and around project 
controls really get under the 

423
00:25:40,000 --> 00:25:44,040
skin of that and understand it 
truly before you, before you 

424
00:25:44,040 --> 00:25:45,800
want to drive on and drive 
forwards. 

425
00:25:45,800 --> 00:25:49,400
It's great picking up bigger 
programmes, but that grounding 

426
00:25:49,400 --> 00:25:53,440
is so important. 
So that would probably be my 

427
00:25:53,960 --> 00:25:58,520
cautious but my advice. 
Listen, dykes. 

428
00:25:58,680 --> 00:26:02,920
So it's such a pleasure 
listening, chatting with you and

429
00:26:02,920 --> 00:26:05,320
getting your advice and 
understanding a bit about how 

430
00:26:05,320 --> 00:26:07,040
you've got to where you, you 
have. 

431
00:26:07,040 --> 00:26:11,720
And you know, it's, it's really 
important when we get time with 

432
00:26:11,720 --> 00:26:15,880
people at your level as well to 
understand the kind of 

433
00:26:15,880 --> 00:26:17,680
challenges you face and how 
you've overcome them. 

434
00:26:17,960 --> 00:26:21,120
And also it's evident to me how 
much you enjoy your work. 

435
00:26:21,120 --> 00:26:25,720
So that's always lovely to hear.
It just leads me to say big, 

436
00:26:25,720 --> 00:26:28,840
massive thank you for your time.
It's been brilliant talking to 

437
00:26:28,840 --> 00:26:30,880
you. 
And you thank you very much for 

438
00:26:30,880 --> 00:26:41,560
your time. 
Thanks again to Donna for 

439
00:26:41,560 --> 00:26:44,600
joining us and to you for 
listening to the APM Podcast. 

440
00:26:45,160 --> 00:26:47,560
I hope you'll be able to take 
something useful from our 

441
00:26:47,560 --> 00:26:50,760
conversation that will help you 
in your own career, whether it's

442
00:26:50,760 --> 00:26:53,320
finding a way to ditch the 
jargon or feeling like you can 

443
00:26:53,320 --> 00:26:55,960
step into a room and own it 
anyway. 

444
00:26:56,320 --> 00:26:58,960
Don't forget to look out for 
more episodes or to rate and 

445
00:26:58,960 --> 00:27:00,880
review it Wherever you get your 
podcasts. 

446
00:27:01,400 --> 00:27:04,120
We'd welcome you to get in touch
with your comments, feedback and

447
00:27:04,120 --> 00:27:10,360
suggestions by emailing us at 
apmpodcast@thinkpublishing.co.uk.

448
00:27:11,520 --> 00:27:14,760
This podcast has been brought to
you by APM, the childhood body 

449
00:27:14,760 --> 00:27:18,360
for the project profession. 
For more information on APM, 

450
00:27:18,360 --> 00:27:21,000
visit apm.org.uk.
