1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:03,720
You're listening to episode 302 
of the Marathon Running Podcast.

2
00:00:03,800 --> 00:00:06,840
In this episode, we're going to 
talk about polarization versus 

3
00:00:06,840 --> 00:00:10,520
pyramid training. 
Welcome to the Marathon Running 

4
00:00:10,520 --> 00:00:13,400
Podcast by Marathon Journal. 
Join us every week for the 

5
00:00:13,400 --> 00:00:16,040
insights and inspiration you 
need to get from the starting 

6
00:00:16,040 --> 00:00:18,120
line to the finish line and 
beyond. 

7
00:00:25,880 --> 00:00:28,120
Hey runners, and welcome to 
episode 302. 

8
00:00:28,120 --> 00:00:29,840
My name is Letty. 
My name is Ryan. 

9
00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:34,160
And we are back with the second 
of three episodes where we talk 

10
00:00:34,160 --> 00:00:38,560
about research studies and 
interpret them to make running 

11
00:00:38,560 --> 00:00:41,440
better for you guys. 
So what's in store for us this 

12
00:00:41,440 --> 00:00:42,280
week? 
Yes. 

13
00:00:42,280 --> 00:00:45,600
So we're going to talk to the 
same guests that we had on last 

14
00:00:45,640 --> 00:00:50,160
week, Arch Tirochalvam from 
Performance Physique, who joined

15
00:00:50,160 --> 00:00:53,840
me to breakdown why this 
research is game changing when 

16
00:00:53,840 --> 00:00:57,120
it comes to polarizing your runs
versus the pyramid model. 

17
00:00:57,400 --> 00:01:00,000
We will talk about what the 
pyramid model is because we do 

18
00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:02,960
not talk about that a lot. 
Everyone knows polarization, 

19
00:01:02,960 --> 00:01:06,800
doing easy runs, easy and hard 
runs hard and not running much 

20
00:01:06,800 --> 00:01:08,560
in the middle. 
But nobody talks about the 

21
00:01:08,560 --> 00:01:12,040
pyramid model, which builds a 
broad base of easy miles with 

22
00:01:12,040 --> 00:01:13,840
moderate doses of threshold 
work. 

23
00:01:14,080 --> 00:01:16,280
And Arch will help me to find 
that even better. 

24
00:01:16,280 --> 00:01:18,440
I think that's like a hot 
concept that was, it's hard for 

25
00:01:18,440 --> 00:01:20,960
me to grasp, but I think it's 
cool that as I'm learning more 

26
00:01:20,960 --> 00:01:25,040
about it and it can probably be 
applicable in lots of sports 

27
00:01:25,040 --> 00:01:28,400
besides running, which is the 
fact that you don't have to 

28
00:01:28,400 --> 00:01:33,640
always train for peak or Max. 
And you probably are better off 

29
00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:38,680
doing submax or lower level 
stuff most frequently and then 

30
00:01:38,680 --> 00:01:42,480
just kind of teasing or going to
those thresholds occasionally, 

31
00:01:42,560 --> 00:01:44,160
which is interesting. 
And it's kind of cool. 

32
00:01:44,160 --> 00:01:47,640
I think it's a good way so you 
don't overuse injuries, so you 

33
00:01:47,640 --> 00:01:49,920
don't get overuse injuries. 
And also mentally. 

34
00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:52,440
Probably easier than trying to 
go all out all the time. 

35
00:01:52,440 --> 00:01:55,720
Yes, that is very true, but who 
is to say that there is not 

36
00:01:55,720 --> 00:02:00,440
another method that might 
equally work for another set of 

37
00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:02,600
people? 
More than one way to skin a cat.

38
00:02:02,600 --> 00:02:05,000
Yeah, I don't like that it's 
animal cruelty. 

39
00:02:05,200 --> 00:02:06,760
But anyway, so you know what I 
mean? 

40
00:02:07,120 --> 00:02:10,320
There's different methods and 
different, different strokes for

41
00:02:10,320 --> 00:02:11,920
different folks Better. 
OK. 

42
00:02:11,920 --> 00:02:14,320
So that's what we're going to 
talk about with this and I don't

43
00:02:14,320 --> 00:02:16,360
want to give away too much of 
it. 

44
00:02:16,680 --> 00:02:18,160
All right, well, let's get into 
it then. 

45
00:02:18,320 --> 00:02:20,120
All right, so without any 
further ado, I'm not going to 

46
00:02:20,120 --> 00:02:25,640
share my conversation with Arch.
All right, so I'm back on with 

47
00:02:25,680 --> 00:02:28,680
Arts to Rotel Mom Arts. 
Thank you so much for joining me

48
00:02:28,680 --> 00:02:30,280
again. 
It's an absolute pleasure. 

49
00:02:30,280 --> 00:02:32,840
Thanks for having me back Letty.
Yes, absolutely. 

50
00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:36,560
And last week we had you on and 
spoke about how much running is 

51
00:02:36,560 --> 00:02:40,400
Too much is very insightful and 
there is a lot to learn. 

52
00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:44,200
So if you have not heard that 
episode, you can go back to it. 

53
00:02:44,560 --> 00:02:47,240
But let's talk about this week's
episode. 

54
00:02:47,240 --> 00:02:50,640
This week we're going to revisit
the topic of polarized training,

55
00:02:50,640 --> 00:02:54,120
but from a different take 
because there is a study that 

56
00:02:54,120 --> 00:02:56,080
you're going to tell us about, 
and we're very excited for it 

57
00:02:56,080 --> 00:02:59,320
because we're absolutely nerdy 
when it comes to these studies. 

58
00:02:59,400 --> 00:03:02,280
But before we do that, let's do 
a quick introduction 

59
00:03:02,280 --> 00:03:05,360
reintroduction so we know who 
we're talking to and where your 

60
00:03:05,360 --> 00:03:07,240
expertise comes from. 
Absolutely. 

61
00:03:07,280 --> 00:03:09,800
So I'm Performance Coach Archie,
I'm the founder of Performance 

62
00:03:09,800 --> 00:03:12,800
Physique and for the last 20 
years I've been working in 

63
00:03:12,800 --> 00:03:16,280
sports and nutrition from a 
really very background. 

64
00:03:16,280 --> 00:03:19,400
A lot of my work has actually 
been in nutrition and then I've 

65
00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:22,360
moved across a variety of 
different sports, writing 

66
00:03:22,360 --> 00:03:24,360
university degrees in sports 
science. 

67
00:03:24,720 --> 00:03:27,880
And my, my fundamental passion 
though, has always been in 

68
00:03:27,880 --> 00:03:29,880
running. 
So this is what I, I really do 

69
00:03:29,880 --> 00:03:32,040
day in day out is, is running 
coaching. 

70
00:03:32,040 --> 00:03:35,160
But the most important thing for
me is that everything that we do

71
00:03:35,160 --> 00:03:38,280
is underpinned by science to 
make sure that we make the right

72
00:03:38,280 --> 00:03:40,320
decisions. 
I love it and I love the topic 

73
00:03:40,320 --> 00:03:44,040
of having those polarized runs. 
Everybody, at least in the 

74
00:03:44,040 --> 00:03:46,800
United States, I'm sure in 
Europe as well, talks about the 

75
00:03:46,840 --> 00:03:49,240
8020 rule, which is the rule of 
thumb. 

76
00:03:49,240 --> 00:03:50,840
Last time we were talking about 
the 10% rule. 

77
00:03:50,840 --> 00:03:55,120
This time, you know, polarizing 
around 80% has to be easy and 

78
00:03:55,120 --> 00:03:58,240
20% fast. 
And there is that gap in the 

79
00:03:58,240 --> 00:04:02,320
middle of pacing that we don't 
really have business running and

80
00:04:02,320 --> 00:04:06,560
depending on our paces. 
Yes, really nice introduction to

81
00:04:06,560 --> 00:04:10,200
the study there actually, yeah. 
So this this follows the the 

82
00:04:10,200 --> 00:04:14,000
theme really of, of identifying 
some really key pieces of 

83
00:04:14,000 --> 00:04:17,320
literature, some scientific 
journal articles that are 

84
00:04:17,320 --> 00:04:19,920
published in the last six 
months, all about running and 

85
00:04:20,440 --> 00:04:23,960
polarized training is one of 
those aspects which we're very 

86
00:04:23,960 --> 00:04:26,320
familiar with. 
And this article maybe took it 

87
00:04:26,320 --> 00:04:29,120
down a couple of new insightful 
roads really. 

88
00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:32,720
So what, what I would say 
actually with with this article,

89
00:04:32,720 --> 00:04:39,120
as opposed to our previous paper
which was on 5200 participants, 

90
00:04:39,320 --> 00:04:41,560
you know, absolutely ginormous 
paper. 

91
00:04:41,600 --> 00:04:45,400
This was a single study. 
So when we look at research, we 

92
00:04:45,400 --> 00:04:49,440
look at the strength of a study,
We look at that from a, how they

93
00:04:49,440 --> 00:04:52,240
constructed their methodology 
and who's publishing the article

94
00:04:52,680 --> 00:04:55,800
B, if it's a single paper, if 
it's a randomized controlled 

95
00:04:55,800 --> 00:04:58,880
trial, which means that that the
way they conducted the 

96
00:04:58,880 --> 00:05:01,240
experiment was very strict. 
So we can get some really good 

97
00:05:01,240 --> 00:05:03,960
results whether it is 
observation or whether it we 

98
00:05:03,960 --> 00:05:06,400
just, so we just sat back, 
whether it was a review or meta 

99
00:05:06,400 --> 00:05:09,080
analysis, these are all lots of 
complicated terms. 

100
00:05:09,080 --> 00:05:10,720
This one falls right in the 
middle. 

101
00:05:10,720 --> 00:05:13,560
So this was a randomized control
trial. 

102
00:05:13,600 --> 00:05:15,280
That's fantastic. 
That's really good. 

103
00:05:15,320 --> 00:05:20,560
It was of 120 recreational 
runners, which again is quite a 

104
00:05:20,560 --> 00:05:24,720
large sample. 
It's not touching that 5201, but

105
00:05:25,040 --> 00:05:27,560
you're pretty much never going 
to get a study that large. 

106
00:05:27,560 --> 00:05:31,560
But it is just a single paper. 
So it is just one experiment and

107
00:05:31,560 --> 00:05:36,280
the rule of thumb in science is 
that we never just throw all our

108
00:05:36,280 --> 00:05:38,440
eggs in one basket over one 
study. 

109
00:05:38,760 --> 00:05:42,040
We have to see this recreated 
and replicated again and again 

110
00:05:42,200 --> 00:05:45,160
for it to truly mean something. 
So I think that's a really 

111
00:05:45,160 --> 00:05:47,640
important part to just caveat 
before we dive in here. 

112
00:05:47,640 --> 00:05:51,360
So with that, how do we put that
in our brains? 

113
00:05:51,360 --> 00:05:55,200
Like, are we from here and out, 
whatever you're saying, taking 

114
00:05:55,200 --> 00:05:57,400
it all with a grain of salt or 
how does that play out? 

115
00:05:57,640 --> 00:06:00,880
Yeah, I think it's really 
important actually that we are 

116
00:06:00,880 --> 00:06:03,760
critical in our approach of 
everything that we read. 

117
00:06:03,760 --> 00:06:07,880
That doesn't mean you, you do 
what a toddler does and say why 

118
00:06:07,920 --> 00:06:09,840
after every single sentence that
you read. 

119
00:06:10,240 --> 00:06:13,160
But it does mean that, OK, this 
is some really useful 

120
00:06:13,160 --> 00:06:16,560
information, The people who have
written this and done the 

121
00:06:16,560 --> 00:06:20,480
experiment are incredibly 
intelligent and very, very well 

122
00:06:20,480 --> 00:06:23,920
skilled in what they do. 
But it does also mean that, OK, 

123
00:06:23,920 --> 00:06:26,800
it's been done once I can listen
to it and I can look at it. 

124
00:06:26,840 --> 00:06:29,800
But I'm not just going to say my
whole training has to change 

125
00:06:29,800 --> 00:06:32,720
because of this one study. 
Let a few more studies come out.

126
00:06:32,800 --> 00:06:35,480
You and I will sit down again 
and I'll, I'll come and say, 

127
00:06:35,480 --> 00:06:37,200
yeah, it looks good now go 
ahead. 

128
00:06:37,200 --> 00:06:39,400
But I think it's really 
important whenever we look at 

129
00:06:39,400 --> 00:06:41,520
any research, we just 
particularly if it comes up on 

130
00:06:41,520 --> 00:06:43,520
social media, we don't just 
think we have to change what 

131
00:06:43,520 --> 00:06:44,880
we're doing. 
If you're doing something which 

132
00:06:44,880 --> 00:06:47,560
feels right and you haven't had 
any injuries and you're making 

133
00:06:47,560 --> 00:06:50,120
progress, you're probably on on 
the right line for you. 

134
00:06:50,120 --> 00:06:52,360
Perfect. 
Thanks for explaining that. 

135
00:06:52,360 --> 00:06:55,800
And with that, who conducted the
study and reviewed it? 

136
00:06:56,200 --> 00:07:00,560
Absolutely, yes. 
So this this was by a a study 

137
00:07:00,560 --> 00:07:04,280
group led by Gang Qin. 
I think that's El Jin. 

138
00:07:04,280 --> 00:07:06,760
I think that's how it's 
pronounced and it was in the 

139
00:07:06,760 --> 00:07:09,200
Journal of Nature. 
So it is actually one of the 

140
00:07:09,200 --> 00:07:13,200
largest, most powerful research 
journals out there. 

141
00:07:13,200 --> 00:07:16,000
Kind of deliberate that the both
papers that are presented have 

142
00:07:16,000 --> 00:07:18,280
come from really credible 
sources, obviously. 

143
00:07:18,280 --> 00:07:20,920
But even though it's an 
individual study, you know, it's

144
00:07:20,920 --> 00:07:23,360
been published in the Nature 
journal that gives us a lot of 

145
00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:25,240
confidence when we when we look 
at this piece. 

146
00:07:25,240 --> 00:07:28,160
And it was again, from the last 
six months to really up to date.

147
00:07:28,160 --> 00:07:31,040
So when we're we're looking at 
their, their title, I'm going to

148
00:07:31,040 --> 00:07:34,480
read this title out because 
initially when I came across 

149
00:07:34,480 --> 00:07:38,160
this piece of research, I 
thought this has nothing to do 

150
00:07:38,160 --> 00:07:39,760
with sport. 
I don't want to, I don't 

151
00:07:39,760 --> 00:07:41,480
actually want to read it. 
And it was only when I actually 

152
00:07:41,480 --> 00:07:44,600
started looking into it, I 
thought, oh, this is actually 

153
00:07:44,600 --> 00:07:46,920
quite relevant. 
So this was machine learning 

154
00:07:46,920 --> 00:07:50,680
based personalized training 
models for optimizing marathon 

155
00:07:50,680 --> 00:07:54,600
performance through pyramid or 
polarized training intensity 

156
00:07:54,600 --> 00:07:57,760
distributions. 
It's a mouthful, it is a long 

157
00:07:57,760 --> 00:08:01,080
title. 
And effectively what they're 

158
00:08:01,080 --> 00:08:04,320
saying is that they have 
developed an algorithm, you 

159
00:08:04,320 --> 00:08:06,880
know, this is when we're talking
about AI, whether we should be 

160
00:08:06,880 --> 00:08:10,720
using AI to, to develop training
programs, etcetera. 

161
00:08:10,880 --> 00:08:13,560
They have used AI to sort the 
data. 

162
00:08:13,560 --> 00:08:16,600
So to go through all the 
research that they've they've 

163
00:08:16,600 --> 00:08:20,360
accumulated and help develop a 
pattern effectively from it. 

164
00:08:20,360 --> 00:08:24,160
And what they're really looking 
at is the two different distinct

165
00:08:24,160 --> 00:08:29,120
models of marathon training 
being the 8020 rule that you are

166
00:08:29,120 --> 00:08:32,200
familiar with, that I am 
familiar with and millions of 

167
00:08:32,200 --> 00:08:34,880
other individuals are familiar 
with, or the pyramid pyramid 

168
00:08:34,880 --> 00:08:39,880
model, which does touch on each 
area of your Physiology. 

169
00:08:40,480 --> 00:08:44,320
So when we look at pyramid, then
the pyramid model basically says

170
00:08:44,320 --> 00:08:47,600
that you are going to run in 
every single zone. 

171
00:08:47,680 --> 00:08:51,320
You're going to spend time 
working away through zone one 

172
00:08:51,480 --> 00:08:54,360
right up to zone 5. 
And when you get nearer Zone 5, 

173
00:08:54,360 --> 00:08:58,200
you'll spend shorter periods of 
time in each individual session 

174
00:08:58,520 --> 00:09:01,920
and as a percentage of your 
total mileage as well running in

175
00:09:01,920 --> 00:09:04,080
Zone 5. 
And then you'll work back down 

176
00:09:04,080 --> 00:09:07,880
out out of zone 5 larger 
durations in zone one, Zone 2 

177
00:09:07,920 --> 00:09:11,760
and that will still utilize some
zone 3. 

178
00:09:11,920 --> 00:09:15,800
It will be very threshold heavy 
training leading to a marathon 

179
00:09:15,840 --> 00:09:18,520
and it it tends to be more 
graduated. 

180
00:09:18,720 --> 00:09:22,080
And that's probably the reason 
why it's suited those who are 

181
00:09:22,080 --> 00:09:23,800
more novice in their running 
ability. 

182
00:09:23,800 --> 00:09:27,800
Getting people to understand 
just how hard that 20% hard is. 

183
00:09:27,800 --> 00:09:29,400
I used to just think everyone 
could do that. 

184
00:09:29,640 --> 00:09:33,320
I thought that was natural. 
You know, when I was 1819, I 

185
00:09:33,320 --> 00:09:36,320
thought everyone when they work 
hard works like this. 

186
00:09:36,720 --> 00:09:38,880
But actually it's a particular 
part of the brain that you have 

187
00:09:38,880 --> 00:09:40,880
to get involved in. 
And you know, for the last 10 

188
00:09:40,880 --> 00:09:42,280
years I basically haven't 
trained. 

189
00:09:42,280 --> 00:09:45,840
So when I do train, I suddenly 
realise, oh, I'm really human 

190
00:09:45,840 --> 00:09:47,920
again. 
It's basically actually this, 

191
00:09:47,920 --> 00:09:50,680
this worries me that I'm about 
to make myself go into this 

192
00:09:50,680 --> 00:09:53,440
horrible zone, whereas before I 
just thought that happened. 

193
00:09:53,440 --> 00:09:57,280
So zone or the pyramid model, 
getting as much time logged in 

194
00:09:57,320 --> 00:10:00,040
each of those zones, spending a 
lot of time in Threshold. 

195
00:10:00,160 --> 00:10:02,800
And that's the real the real 
difference between the two. 

196
00:10:07,720 --> 00:10:09,760
OK. 
So literally, if you look at the

197
00:10:09,760 --> 00:10:14,080
zones being laid out, it does 
look like a pyramid on a scale 

198
00:10:14,080 --> 00:10:17,040
versus it's exactly that. 
It's like a reverse pyramid. 

199
00:10:17,040 --> 00:10:18,960
Exactly. 
That perfect Awesome. 

200
00:10:18,960 --> 00:10:22,320
OK, so. 
Historically, we've spent a lot 

201
00:10:22,320 --> 00:10:26,320
of time preaching the importance
of understanding lactate 

202
00:10:26,320 --> 00:10:30,440
threshold, which can sit around 
Zone 3 upwards. 

203
00:10:30,440 --> 00:10:35,440
And we're also very recently 
hearing loads of messages about 

204
00:10:35,640 --> 00:10:39,800
Zone 1 and Zone 2 and then a 
tiny bit right at the top end. 

205
00:10:39,800 --> 00:10:42,600
20% hard work. 
It's really, really, really 

206
00:10:42,600 --> 00:10:45,000
interesting. 
When you read this paper, you 

207
00:10:45,280 --> 00:10:49,640
get the feeling that they have 
identified 1 route, 1 route to 

208
00:10:49,640 --> 00:10:52,960
marathon success. 
So if you spend a little bit of 

209
00:10:52,960 --> 00:10:55,640
time reading the abstract, 
you'll have the feeling that 

210
00:10:55,640 --> 00:10:58,840
there is one route to success. 
If you read the entire article, 

211
00:10:58,880 --> 00:11:01,320
you'll suddenly realize that 
it's a blend. 

212
00:11:01,480 --> 00:11:04,800
And there is a deep message 
rooted in here that depending on

213
00:11:04,800 --> 00:11:09,000
who you are, these models will 
benefit different individuals 

214
00:11:09,000 --> 00:11:11,160
and will create slightly 
different adaptations. 

215
00:11:11,160 --> 00:11:12,960
And I'll give you those 
adaptations. 

216
00:11:12,960 --> 00:11:17,360
So polarized training, we know 
it improved VO2 Max. 

217
00:11:17,440 --> 00:11:22,760
We know that improves VO2 Max, 
which is one of the predictors 

218
00:11:22,760 --> 00:11:25,360
of race performance, but not not
the only one. 

219
00:11:25,560 --> 00:11:28,320
It is very popular at the moment
to say that VO2 Max is 

220
00:11:28,320 --> 00:11:29,600
everything that you need to 
improve. 

221
00:11:29,640 --> 00:11:31,480
It's not, but it's a nice thing 
to have. 

222
00:11:31,760 --> 00:11:34,960
And we know polarized training 
as a result of this study, was 

223
00:11:34,960 --> 00:11:39,720
quite clearly better at 
developing a greater VO2 Max 

224
00:11:39,960 --> 00:11:43,200
than the pyramid training model,
where they went through every 

225
00:11:43,200 --> 00:11:46,200
little phase and then worked 
back out of those phases as 

226
00:11:46,200 --> 00:11:48,240
well. 
They also identified in their 

227
00:11:48,240 --> 00:11:52,880
study that marathon performance 
was better generally for those 

228
00:11:52,880 --> 00:11:56,680
following a polarized training 
model, and they also noticed 

229
00:11:56,720 --> 00:12:00,840
that it produced similar or 
actual lower training stress. 

230
00:12:01,200 --> 00:12:04,600
So when we're talking about a a 
marathon, we are doing 

231
00:12:04,600 --> 00:12:06,440
incredibly difficult things to 
our body. 

232
00:12:06,480 --> 00:12:08,600
You know that there will be an 
argument from some people that 

233
00:12:08,600 --> 00:12:11,480
say that a marathon actually 
isn't very healthy because of 

234
00:12:11,480 --> 00:12:13,440
the different stresses that we 
place on our body and the 

235
00:12:13,440 --> 00:12:15,760
different risk factors. 
And therefore, if there's 

236
00:12:15,760 --> 00:12:18,720
anything we can do to reduce 
those risk factors, then perhaps

237
00:12:18,720 --> 00:12:21,320
we'll we'll take those. 
And polarized training really 

238
00:12:21,400 --> 00:12:24,480
found that or this research 
found that polarized training 

239
00:12:24,480 --> 00:12:26,880
really did reduce those those 
stresses. 

240
00:12:26,880 --> 00:12:30,680
So effectively, this paper 
identifying that you could get 

241
00:12:30,960 --> 00:12:33,360
better important improvements 
within your performance in 

242
00:12:33,360 --> 00:12:37,080
training, at least matching what
all the other training methods 

243
00:12:37,080 --> 00:12:40,040
do, if not reducing the risk 
associated with it. 

244
00:12:40,120 --> 00:12:42,000
So overall, sounds pretty good, 
right? 

245
00:12:42,080 --> 00:12:44,480
Yeah. 
So at this point, we're thinking

246
00:12:44,880 --> 00:12:47,000
everything's normal. 
This, this doesn't really tell 

247
00:12:47,000 --> 00:12:50,360
us anything new and a lot of 
people will have been saying 

248
00:12:50,360 --> 00:12:52,880
over the last couple of years 
there is a risk here that we're 

249
00:12:52,880 --> 00:12:56,600
just studying men. 
You know, a lot of research has 

250
00:12:56,600 --> 00:12:59,200
been criticised for being male 
dominant. 

251
00:12:59,240 --> 00:13:03,840
The researchers actually used a 
split roughly of 55 to 45% male 

252
00:13:03,840 --> 00:13:06,720
to female. 
So it's relatively even as well.

253
00:13:06,720 --> 00:13:09,240
So we're we're identifying 
physiological changes and what 

254
00:13:09,240 --> 00:13:11,960
they identify really is that 
polarised training again 

255
00:13:11,960 --> 00:13:16,600
developed loads in terms of 
mitochondria and capillarization

256
00:13:16,600 --> 00:13:18,560
and fat oxidation from the easy 
running. 

257
00:13:18,560 --> 00:13:22,000
So these things which give us a 
big engine and that hard running

258
00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:25,400
episodes really helped 
developers neuromusically 

259
00:13:25,400 --> 00:13:29,160
improve our running economy and 
improve our our top end 

260
00:13:29,160 --> 00:13:32,920
effectively how just how fast we
can go, what we're trying to 

261
00:13:32,920 --> 00:13:36,520
avoid or what polarized training
is trying to avoid is murky 

262
00:13:36,520 --> 00:13:39,800
stuff, which doesn't necessarily
create a lot of adaptation. 

263
00:13:39,800 --> 00:13:42,640
So being in the middle of those 
two, which is where most novice 

264
00:13:42,640 --> 00:13:46,160
runners are guilty of spending 
time too fast to be easy, too 

265
00:13:46,160 --> 00:13:48,760
slow to actually create a lot of
change, polarized training 

266
00:13:48,760 --> 00:13:51,040
doesn't do that. 
It's it's not soft, it's really 

267
00:13:51,040 --> 00:13:54,080
strategic as in you're going to 
be out here and over here. 

268
00:13:54,080 --> 00:13:57,920
Now, the common misconception 
really here is that polarized 

269
00:13:57,920 --> 00:13:59,880
training doesn't mean that 
you're just jogging all of the 

270
00:13:59,880 --> 00:14:01,360
time. 
It just means that you're 

271
00:14:01,360 --> 00:14:04,880
disciplined not to turn 
everything into this grey zone 

272
00:14:04,880 --> 00:14:07,520
area. 
So a lot of people keep things 

273
00:14:07,520 --> 00:14:10,120
feeling really easy, whereas 
actually, if we could training 

274
00:14:10,120 --> 00:14:13,960
over a 16 week marathon block, 
your easy is going to go become 

275
00:14:13,960 --> 00:14:15,800
faster. 
It is always going to become 

276
00:14:15,800 --> 00:14:18,040
faster and faster and faster if 
you're improving fitness. 

277
00:14:18,240 --> 00:14:20,680
And if you don't make that 
change, then you are actually 

278
00:14:20,680 --> 00:14:23,120
holding yourself back as a as a 
marathon runner. 

279
00:14:23,120 --> 00:14:26,960
What I really liked about this 
study though, is it talks about 

280
00:14:26,960 --> 00:14:28,960
responders. 
And this is the key thing for me

281
00:14:28,960 --> 00:14:31,560
here. 
So there are typical responders 

282
00:14:31,560 --> 00:14:34,880
to research. 
One of the key being key moments

283
00:14:34,880 --> 00:14:36,360
in history actually was in 
creatine. 

284
00:14:36,360 --> 00:14:38,040
I don't know if you're familiar 
with creatine letting. 

285
00:14:38,840 --> 00:14:43,080
I mean, I am, but maybe for the 
sake of our audience we can 

286
00:14:43,200 --> 00:14:44,320
address this a little bit. 
And. 

287
00:14:44,640 --> 00:14:47,240
That's no problem. 
So creatine monohydrates or 

288
00:14:47,240 --> 00:14:51,760
creatine itself is a, is a 
supplement that is of a 

289
00:14:52,040 --> 00:14:55,560
naturally occurring compound 
within the body and it takes 

290
00:14:55,560 --> 00:14:59,560
place within when we use or 
ingest food, this reaction 

291
00:14:59,560 --> 00:15:02,600
happens and we can use creatine.
Well, it's been known for years 

292
00:15:02,600 --> 00:15:04,960
how effective it is across 
sports and in health. 

293
00:15:04,960 --> 00:15:07,120
We're not here to talk about 
that, but the the analogy has 

294
00:15:07,120 --> 00:15:10,920
always been about creatine is so
fantastic that we have these 

295
00:15:10,920 --> 00:15:14,880
great responders. 
Roughly 95% of people respond to

296
00:15:14,880 --> 00:15:18,720
creatine. 5% of people though 
don't respond to creatine in the

297
00:15:18,720 --> 00:15:20,120
same way. 
They don't really get 

298
00:15:20,120 --> 00:15:23,600
substantial effects. 
So it sucks to be them basically

299
00:15:24,120 --> 00:15:27,440
because it is so amazing and so 
wonderful. 

300
00:15:27,440 --> 00:15:31,880
So you want to be a responder. 
This paper identified responders

301
00:15:31,880 --> 00:15:35,600
as well or multiple aspects. 
So effectively, when they 

302
00:15:35,600 --> 00:15:40,320
conduct their research on 120 
recreational individuals, 32% of

303
00:15:40,320 --> 00:15:42,160
people were polarized 
responders. 

304
00:15:42,160 --> 00:15:45,120
So they improved their 
performance based on the 8020 

305
00:15:45,120 --> 00:15:48,000
rule or it doesn't tell you 
enough of is that exactly? 

306
00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:52,320
32% as well responded to the 
pyramid or pyramid training 

307
00:15:52,320 --> 00:15:54,560
model as well. 
So it doesn't necessarily have 

308
00:15:54,560 --> 00:15:57,920
to apply to both. 
Almost 20% of people responded 

309
00:15:57,920 --> 00:16:00,000
to both methods. 
What a lovely group of 

310
00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:01,880
individuals. 
What a happy time they have. 

311
00:16:02,320 --> 00:16:04,240
They just know if they train, 
they're going to get better. 

312
00:16:04,240 --> 00:16:09,120
And then there was this, this 
bout of 18% of non responders. 

313
00:16:09,120 --> 00:16:11,440
That's a for me. 
I don't know anything about this

314
00:16:11,440 --> 00:16:15,400
research, but I'm going to go 
out on a limb here as a 

315
00:16:15,520 --> 00:16:18,760
individual who's used to 
critiquing research, 18% is a 

316
00:16:18,760 --> 00:16:22,280
really large number to say 
they're not a responder to 

317
00:16:22,280 --> 00:16:24,120
training. 
And I would say there would be 

318
00:16:24,120 --> 00:16:27,200
some confounding variable there.
So something wasn't being 

319
00:16:27,200 --> 00:16:31,040
adhered to quite correctly or 
maybe they didn't identify zones

320
00:16:31,040 --> 00:16:34,720
etcetera, etcetera to training. 
But how amazing is this that we 

321
00:16:34,720 --> 00:16:39,800
speak about 8020 being the King 
Ding a Ling of all training. 

322
00:16:40,240 --> 00:16:44,200
And actually the pyramid model 
was just as effective for for 

323
00:16:44,200 --> 00:16:47,600
other individuals. 
And there was a kind of argument

324
00:16:47,600 --> 00:16:51,160
here for these 120 individuals 
as well that pretty much 

325
00:16:51,160 --> 00:16:54,600
everyone will always benefit 
from the pyramid model in the 

326
00:16:54,600 --> 00:16:56,840
start of their program. 
But then as you became more 

327
00:16:56,840 --> 00:16:59,840
experienced and the faster 
athletes, they would need to 

328
00:16:59,840 --> 00:17:03,480
shift to the polarized model in 
order to get more from it. 

329
00:17:03,480 --> 00:17:07,160
It doesn't necessarily mean that
it would happen in one year of 

330
00:17:07,160 --> 00:17:09,400
training. 
It might be 4 years that you 

331
00:17:09,400 --> 00:17:10,680
actually need to make that 
shift. 

332
00:17:10,720 --> 00:17:12,640
It's really interesting, this 
article. 

333
00:17:12,760 --> 00:17:15,839
The thing it really brought to 
the the face of things was that 

334
00:17:15,839 --> 00:17:20,440
actually the 8020 rule is great 
and it's a really good way of 

335
00:17:20,440 --> 00:17:22,800
getting people to train a little
bit more efficiently. 

336
00:17:22,839 --> 00:17:25,760
But we're all different. 
There are individual differences

337
00:17:25,760 --> 00:17:27,319
and we respond to it 
differently. 

338
00:17:27,560 --> 00:17:29,800
And there is another opportunity
for us. 

339
00:17:29,800 --> 00:17:31,640
Yeah, I mean I. 
Think those numbers are really 

340
00:17:31,640 --> 00:17:35,040
kind of shocking, right? 
Because like you said, 8020 is 

341
00:17:35,040 --> 00:17:37,080
the king. 
And I'm wondering, do you have 

342
00:17:37,080 --> 00:17:41,320
any background on how many of 
these runners were novice 

343
00:17:41,320 --> 00:17:42,920
runners? 
Because I guess if you're a 

344
00:17:42,920 --> 00:17:46,760
novice runner, you're responding
to training kind of like a 

345
00:17:47,000 --> 00:17:50,240
you're going to respond because 
you're going from zero to 

346
00:17:50,240 --> 00:17:51,840
something and you're going to 
get better. 

347
00:17:51,840 --> 00:17:54,120
It's like running your first 
marathon, you're going to PR, 

348
00:17:54,280 --> 00:17:57,480
and then your second marathon is
probably going to be better 

349
00:17:57,480 --> 00:17:59,040
because you've learned 
something. 

350
00:17:59,600 --> 00:18:00,760
Yeah. 
Absolutely. 

351
00:18:00,760 --> 00:18:03,080
I mean that that does make a 
massive difference here. 

352
00:18:03,080 --> 00:18:06,720
The will of been a again an 
agreed sign of period of what 

353
00:18:06,720 --> 00:18:09,520
counts as an eligible 
recreational runner. 

354
00:18:09,880 --> 00:18:12,840
And it's a really good point. 
You know, newbie gains exist for

355
00:18:12,840 --> 00:18:15,080
a reason. 
We basically have an untrained 

356
00:18:15,080 --> 00:18:17,360
individual who's going to 
benefit from whatever they do. 

357
00:18:17,360 --> 00:18:20,840
I think, I think the the key 
point in which the paper talked 

358
00:18:20,840 --> 00:18:24,560
about was that they classed 
anyone who had done, I think it 

359
00:18:24,560 --> 00:18:29,240
was less than three to four 
years of training as a novice 

360
00:18:29,360 --> 00:18:31,720
and I think it was the 
three-year mark rather than the 

361
00:18:31,720 --> 00:18:34,080
four were considered as novice 
still. 

362
00:18:34,560 --> 00:18:37,920
But they will have in their 
methods under participants, they

363
00:18:37,920 --> 00:18:40,800
will have a really direct 
breakdown and if they haven't 

364
00:18:40,800 --> 00:18:43,840
listed it, they would have 
supplied that breakdown to the 

365
00:18:44,480 --> 00:18:47,600
effectively the peer reviewers 
at Nature in order for it to be 

366
00:18:47,880 --> 00:18:50,480
to be given the go ahead. 
I do remember them they actually

367
00:18:50,480 --> 00:18:52,840
had again achievement times as 
cut offs. 

368
00:18:53,160 --> 00:18:57,720
So how fast they could run this 
time or how far they ran weekly.

369
00:18:57,840 --> 00:18:59,600
Again, that does rely on 
honesty, doesn't it? 

370
00:18:59,600 --> 00:19:03,320
You know, they, it does rely on 
someone who enters the market to

371
00:19:03,320 --> 00:19:06,840
be picked for a study. 
It's not uncommon though, in 

372
00:19:06,840 --> 00:19:10,240
research for people to be booted
out of research to be basically 

373
00:19:10,240 --> 00:19:13,600
said you're not meeting the 
criteria for this experiment, 

374
00:19:13,600 --> 00:19:15,800
you're going to ruin the 
experiment and therefore you 

375
00:19:15,800 --> 00:19:17,960
need to finish. 
That's quite regularly an 

376
00:19:17,960 --> 00:19:20,600
occurrence within research. 
Interesting. 

377
00:19:20,640 --> 00:19:23,980
OK, so I think. 
Realistically, the biggest take 

378
00:19:23,980 --> 00:19:29,200
away from this piece of research
was that you shouldn't just rely

379
00:19:29,480 --> 00:19:31,960
on what you've been told is the 
way you train. 

380
00:19:31,960 --> 00:19:34,240
It's really important to see 
what's happening with your 

381
00:19:34,240 --> 00:19:36,480
training. 
So, you know, Most of my runners

382
00:19:36,480 --> 00:19:40,520
do follow an 8020 ish rule 
depending on what they're doing.

383
00:19:41,520 --> 00:19:43,960
Most of my runners will not just
do a marathon block though, 

384
00:19:43,960 --> 00:19:46,240
because I don't believe that is 
how you effectively train for 

385
00:19:46,240 --> 00:19:48,120
marathons. 
Most of my, most of my runners 

386
00:19:48,120 --> 00:19:51,160
will have a speed block, which 
leads into a marathon. 

387
00:19:51,160 --> 00:19:53,680
And therefore we spend a lot of 
time doing fast stuff. 

388
00:19:53,680 --> 00:19:56,080
We spend a lot of time doing 
threshold stuff, make them a 

389
00:19:56,080 --> 00:19:59,040
stronger athlete effectively. 
And then we throw them into the 

390
00:19:59,040 --> 00:20:01,920
the marathon and we see them, 
you know, have great successes 

391
00:20:01,920 --> 00:20:05,480
and enjoy the process as well. 
The easy way as an individual, 

392
00:20:05,480 --> 00:20:08,240
if you're training, if you're 
running on your own, is just get

393
00:20:08,240 --> 00:20:11,280
the first week, first eight 
weeks, say done and then. 

394
00:20:11,480 --> 00:20:13,880
Maybe test your performance, 
have a little look at what's 

395
00:20:13,880 --> 00:20:16,840
been working for you, particular
training sessions that felt 

396
00:20:16,840 --> 00:20:19,880
really good and then experiment,
you know, try that again later 

397
00:20:19,880 --> 00:20:22,400
on in the training program. 
The couple of sessions which 

398
00:20:22,400 --> 00:20:24,280
felt really good, are they 
feeling really good because 

399
00:20:24,280 --> 00:20:26,240
they're challenging you but 
you're enjoying it or are they 

400
00:20:26,240 --> 00:20:28,400
feeling really good because they
didn't push you enough? 

401
00:20:28,680 --> 00:20:30,720
It's important to have the idea 
between those two. 

402
00:20:30,720 --> 00:20:33,320
And then next time you run a 
marathon, maybe make the the 

403
00:20:33,320 --> 00:20:35,240
reflection and make the 
adaptations. 

404
00:20:35,240 --> 00:20:37,800
But that is the most important 
take away from this study. 

405
00:20:41,600 --> 00:20:42,280
Yeah. 
And it's. 

406
00:20:42,320 --> 00:20:44,400
Interesting too because how do 
you think? 

407
00:20:44,680 --> 00:20:47,560
I mean, most coaches depending 
on who they're certified with, 

408
00:20:47,560 --> 00:20:50,080
if they're even certified, 
because lots of coaches aren't 

409
00:20:50,080 --> 00:20:54,680
certified, they go with this 
8020 method and just make it to 

410
00:20:54,680 --> 00:20:59,200
their own version of it and 
train their runners. 

411
00:20:59,200 --> 00:21:03,800
But how would a coach identify a
person that potentially could 

412
00:21:03,800 --> 00:21:06,080
benefit from a different type of
training? 

413
00:21:06,080 --> 00:21:09,480
Perhaps the pyramid training, I 
think yeah, I. 

414
00:21:09,480 --> 00:21:11,520
Think, you know, putting my 
coach's hat on rather than a 

415
00:21:11,520 --> 00:21:14,480
scientific hat all comes down to
conversations. 

416
00:21:14,480 --> 00:21:17,520
Like I speak a lot to my 
athletes about feel, how does 

417
00:21:17,520 --> 00:21:19,920
that feel? 
What was happening emotionally 

418
00:21:19,920 --> 00:21:22,720
during that run or that week of 
training, etcetera, etcetera. 

419
00:21:22,720 --> 00:21:25,400
You should be able to get an 
idea of when something needs to 

420
00:21:25,400 --> 00:21:28,320
change or if something just 
appears to have clicked for a 

421
00:21:28,320 --> 00:21:31,960
runner and go with it. 
And I think that's probably the 

422
00:21:32,160 --> 00:21:34,720
hardest aspects of training, 
developing your emotional and 

423
00:21:34,720 --> 00:21:37,600
emotional intelligence 
sufficiently to know just how to

424
00:21:37,720 --> 00:21:40,640
push someone that suits them, 
though, yes, exactly because. 

425
00:21:40,640 --> 00:21:44,440
Everyone's interpretation of 
perceived pain is even 

426
00:21:44,440 --> 00:21:45,800
different, right? 
Exactly. 

427
00:21:46,000 --> 00:21:48,160
It's totally that. 
I mean that's that's why we saw 

428
00:21:48,160 --> 00:21:51,880
so much female success over the 
ultras, because of perceived 

429
00:21:51,880 --> 00:21:53,560
pain. 
Effectively for a while it 

430
00:21:53,560 --> 00:21:56,560
looked like Physiology was the 
cause of it. 

431
00:21:56,560 --> 00:21:59,640
There is still evidence pointing
towards that we're too early in 

432
00:21:59,640 --> 00:22:02,040
the research, but I think a lot 
of it just comes down to 

433
00:22:02,040 --> 00:22:04,240
perceived pain. 
I've coached thousands of people

434
00:22:04,240 --> 00:22:07,120
and I don't know. 
I think women in general. 

435
00:22:07,120 --> 00:22:09,000
I'm not talking about my current
coaching groups if you're 

436
00:22:09,000 --> 00:22:13,280
listening, but women in general 
tend to follow the program more 

437
00:22:13,280 --> 00:22:16,880
closely and honestly than men in
my experience. 

438
00:22:16,880 --> 00:22:18,960
That might be so different for 
loads of other people. 

439
00:22:18,960 --> 00:22:22,880
It definitely will be different 
based on cultures and locations,

440
00:22:22,920 --> 00:22:26,200
but I know there was a real 
period of time where when I was 

441
00:22:26,200 --> 00:22:28,920
coaching, I always used to coach
loads of men and then suddenly 

442
00:22:28,920 --> 00:22:32,000
that changed and there was a lot
of women I was coaching and 

443
00:22:32,000 --> 00:22:35,280
during that point of coaching, 
predominantly women, they were 

444
00:22:35,280 --> 00:22:37,600
really happy to just train 
whatever you said. 

445
00:22:37,600 --> 00:22:39,560
Yeah, cool, I'll do it. 
I love to moan, obviously, 

446
00:22:39,560 --> 00:22:42,000
because we all like to moan, but
I'll do it. 

447
00:22:42,200 --> 00:22:45,240
Whereas men didn't want to be 
told what worked. 

448
00:22:45,640 --> 00:22:47,920
It's quite strange, but that's 
my experience. 

449
00:22:48,000 --> 00:22:50,480
I mean that happens all the. 
Time with people that have been 

450
00:22:50,880 --> 00:22:53,800
self coached for so long and 
then they suddenly have a coach.

451
00:22:54,040 --> 00:22:56,760
And then, you know, I do talk to
a lot of coaches and it's 

452
00:22:56,760 --> 00:22:59,360
frustrating for them because 
they'll write workouts and these

453
00:22:59,360 --> 00:23:02,320
workouts aren't being followed 
because they're being second 

454
00:23:02,320 --> 00:23:03,880
guessed. 
And then they're like, well, 

455
00:23:03,880 --> 00:23:06,680
it's a recipe and you need all 
the ingredients. 

456
00:23:06,680 --> 00:23:09,360
But if you're adding extra salt 
because you feel like doing 

457
00:23:09,360 --> 00:23:11,120
that, it's not going to turn out
OK. 

458
00:23:11,120 --> 00:23:12,120
Yeah. 
And that must be really. 

459
00:23:12,120 --> 00:23:14,720
Difficult for them. 
I mean it, I, there's like I 

460
00:23:14,720 --> 00:23:17,360
said, there's been periods in 
time where maybe I've had one or

461
00:23:17,360 --> 00:23:20,400
two people like that, but I'm in
a luxurious position being able 

462
00:23:20,400 --> 00:23:23,240
to say no to people, you know, I
don't, I don't need to coach 

463
00:23:23,240 --> 00:23:25,000
you. 
So our coaching group is, is 

464
00:23:25,040 --> 00:23:27,040
great. 
They're really, they understand 

465
00:23:27,040 --> 00:23:28,400
the science behind it. 
I think that's the most 

466
00:23:28,400 --> 00:23:30,160
important thing. 
And then we are able to have a 

467
00:23:30,160 --> 00:23:32,520
conversation as well to 
understand feelings of I just 

468
00:23:32,520 --> 00:23:36,200
want to do this though, and we 
find a negotiation works really 

469
00:23:36,200 --> 00:23:37,400
well for that. 
That's awesome. 

470
00:23:37,760 --> 00:23:41,960
All right, So with that study, 
you said biggest takeaways for 

471
00:23:41,960 --> 00:23:43,600
somebody. 
Yeah, it it's. 

472
00:23:43,720 --> 00:23:46,400
Effectively play around with 
your running. 

473
00:23:46,680 --> 00:23:50,400
So follow a stimulus for a while
and then test yourself. 

474
00:23:50,600 --> 00:23:54,040
You know, do a a time trial 
which is going to see whether 

475
00:23:54,040 --> 00:23:56,440
you have been making performance
gains or not. 

476
00:23:56,440 --> 00:23:59,800
If you have cool, stick with it.
Maybe start to move towards 

477
00:23:59,800 --> 00:24:03,040
another training stimulus to 
give yourself a little push and 

478
00:24:03,040 --> 00:24:07,200
then if it hasn't made 
particular progress for you at 

479
00:24:07,200 --> 00:24:11,520
that point, shift, shift over to
a new Tryon type of training 

480
00:24:11,520 --> 00:24:15,240
model or at least shift when 
it's your next race. 

481
00:24:15,440 --> 00:24:19,080
You know, if you maybe you're 
too deep into a training period 

482
00:24:19,080 --> 00:24:22,240
for your marathon, your half 
marathon, whatever it is, then 

483
00:24:22,720 --> 00:24:24,200
maybe you don't want to make 
that change now. 

484
00:24:24,520 --> 00:24:26,120
Next time though, play around 
with it. 

485
00:24:26,120 --> 00:24:28,120
Very awesome. 
Thank you, Art. 

486
00:24:28,120 --> 00:24:32,520
And for anyone that is 
listening, we're going to be 

487
00:24:32,520 --> 00:24:36,600
putting the study in our show 
notes as well as Arch's contact,

488
00:24:36,600 --> 00:24:40,200
which I'm going to have you tell
me again for anyone that is not 

489
00:24:40,200 --> 00:24:42,400
in the position of looking at 
the notes. 

490
00:24:42,800 --> 00:24:43,520
Awesome. 
Yeah. 

491
00:24:43,520 --> 00:24:47,280
You can get me on Instagram at 
Performance Physique or if you 

492
00:24:47,280 --> 00:24:50,200
just go to 
performancephysique.co.uk or you

493
00:24:50,200 --> 00:24:52,400
just type in Performance 
Physique or my name on Google 

494
00:24:52,400 --> 00:24:54,960
and my :) will appear very 
awesome. 

495
00:24:54,960 --> 00:24:56,600
Thank you so much, Art. 
Thanks for having me. 

496
00:24:59,680 --> 00:25:03,320
Thank you, Art. 
Very much for this study and 

497
00:25:03,320 --> 00:25:06,880
speaking about it. 
It was very interesting to hear 

498
00:25:07,040 --> 00:25:09,400
that there's different strokes 
for different folks. 

499
00:25:09,400 --> 00:25:11,200
You like that? 
Once you got an analogy, you'll 

500
00:25:11,200 --> 00:25:13,000
stick to it, huh? 
I do, I'm going to say. 

501
00:25:13,000 --> 00:25:15,440
That a bunch more times. 
Good thing this is pre recorded 

502
00:25:15,440 --> 00:25:17,080
and you don't have to actually 
listen to it because I'm in 

503
00:25:17,080 --> 00:25:19,000
Kenya right now. 
Speaking of Kenya. 

504
00:25:19,000 --> 00:25:20,680
How's that going, future that he
is? 

505
00:25:20,680 --> 00:25:24,480
Probably having a blast trying 
to record as much footage as 

506
00:25:24,480 --> 00:25:28,280
possible, trying to get as many 
runs in as possible, trying to 

507
00:25:28,280 --> 00:25:31,280
just soak it all in because it's
such a beautiful, wonderful 

508
00:25:31,280 --> 00:25:34,080
place. 
And hopefully at this point, I 

509
00:25:34,080 --> 00:25:37,000
will have shared a lot of it on 
our YouTube account. 

510
00:25:37,000 --> 00:25:39,160
Again, I'm going to link that in
our show notes. 

511
00:25:39,160 --> 00:25:43,360
And if you guys haven't seen our
vlogs for Kenya yet, they are 

512
00:25:43,360 --> 00:25:46,000
hopefully going to be at 
Marathon Journal. 

513
00:25:46,080 --> 00:25:49,480
So go to YouTube and put in at 
Marathon Journal and you will 

514
00:25:49,480 --> 00:25:51,280
see them there. 
So as we're recording. 

515
00:25:51,280 --> 00:25:53,840
This and you're not there yet 
but if people are going to go 

516
00:25:53,840 --> 00:25:58,400
watch your videos and your vlogs
what are they going to see yes 

517
00:25:58,400 --> 00:26:02,040
so on the. 
Menu for Kenya are daily runs at

518
00:26:02,040 --> 00:26:05,960
sunrise and some of them could 
be from the camp, others could 

519
00:26:05,960 --> 00:26:09,760
be on the tarmac, others could 
be on the Elliott Kipchogi 

520
00:26:09,760 --> 00:26:12,480
track, etcetera. 
So that's on the menu actually, 

521
00:26:12,480 --> 00:26:16,000
it's double runs. 
And then we have a day that's 

522
00:26:16,000 --> 00:26:21,240
packed with seminars on a 
lifestyle, on training, on 

523
00:26:21,240 --> 00:26:24,000
coaching. 
And then we have visits planned 

524
00:26:24,000 --> 00:26:28,760
to schools, to other community 
buildings, to Kalenjin tribes, 

525
00:26:28,960 --> 00:26:30,840
etcetera. 
And then we also have 

526
00:26:30,840 --> 00:26:34,840
sightseeing and forest runs and 
hikes and all sorts of stuff. 

527
00:26:35,200 --> 00:26:38,280
And hopefully I will be really 
able to capture all of that, 

528
00:26:38,280 --> 00:26:41,160
Ryan, because I haven't been to 
this particular camp yet. 

529
00:26:41,200 --> 00:26:43,320
I mean, I'm, I'm there right 
now, but I'm telling you in the 

530
00:26:43,320 --> 00:26:46,240
future and it sounds really, 
really amazing. 

531
00:26:46,240 --> 00:26:48,520
So I'm very excited and 
hopefully I'll be able to share 

532
00:26:48,520 --> 00:26:50,360
that with you guys. 
I'll be interesting to see. 

533
00:26:50,360 --> 00:26:52,120
How it's different from the last
one you went to? 

534
00:26:52,400 --> 00:26:55,000
So I think. 
My first time in Kenya can never

535
00:26:55,000 --> 00:26:57,760
be replaced, and then this time 
is probably going to be just as 

536
00:26:57,760 --> 00:27:00,600
good of an experience, just in a
different way. 

537
00:27:00,600 --> 00:27:02,560
Well, you did go back. 
Yes, I did. 

538
00:27:02,560 --> 00:27:05,240
Go back and hopefully, who 
knows, we'll be back again. 

539
00:27:05,280 --> 00:27:06,400
So what are we talking about 
next? 

540
00:27:06,400 --> 00:27:09,400
Week so next week is the. 
Third and last episode of our 

541
00:27:09,400 --> 00:27:12,280
three series of sharing 
research. 

542
00:27:12,280 --> 00:27:15,040
And that study reveals why 
strength training prevents the 

543
00:27:15,040 --> 00:27:18,800
late race collapse. 
And so again, I'm going to be 

544
00:27:18,920 --> 00:27:23,520
sitting down with Arch, who will
talk me through that study, this

545
00:27:23,520 --> 00:27:27,800
time from the Lowboro 
University, which is a pinnacle 

546
00:27:27,800 --> 00:27:30,360
of British sports science, which
is also going to be very, very 

547
00:27:30,360 --> 00:27:32,280
interesting. 
So TuneIn back next Monday. 

548
00:27:32,280 --> 00:27:34,120
And with that, have a good 
weekend running. 

549
00:27:37,120 --> 00:27:39,160
You've been listening to. 
The Marathon Running Podcast by 

550
00:27:39,160 --> 00:27:41,960
Marathon Journal. 
If you've enjoyed the show, 

551
00:27:41,960 --> 00:27:44,960
check us out at 
marathonjournal.com or follow us

552
00:27:44,960 --> 00:27:46,920
on social media. 
Happy training.

