1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:04,920
Really it's only now I would say
that we've had proper scalable 

2
00:00:04,920 --> 00:00:10,120
infrastructure like ready to 
take stable coins to the masses.

3
00:00:10,200 --> 00:00:14,720
Noble is neutral purpose built 
infrastructure for the 

4
00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:18,640
transmission and proliferation 
of these stable coins. 

5
00:00:18,680 --> 00:00:22,080
I do believe and can anticipate 
that the launch of the app 

6
00:00:22,080 --> 00:00:25,480
layer, it will be like a new era
for for Noble because again, 

7
00:00:25,480 --> 00:00:28,960
we've never actually had defy on
Noble itself, which is kind of 

8
00:00:28,960 --> 00:00:30,240
crazy. 
And yet there's all of this 

9
00:00:30,240 --> 00:00:32,800
traction. 
Is Cosmos finally dead, Yelena? 

10
00:00:32,840 --> 00:00:34,280
But I guess that's the question 
I want to ask you. 

11
00:00:34,440 --> 00:00:43,480
Like, do you think this episode 
has brought you by Gnosis? 

12
00:00:43,880 --> 00:00:46,000
Building the open Internet one 
block at a time. 

13
00:00:46,520 --> 00:00:50,080
Nosis was founded in 2015 and 
it's grown from 1 of Ethereum's 

14
00:00:50,080 --> 00:00:53,480
earliest projects into a 
powerful ecosystem for open user

15
00:00:53,480 --> 00:00:56,360
owned finance. 
Nosis is also the team behind 

16
00:00:56,360 --> 00:00:59,000
products that had become core to
my business and that are so many

17
00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:03,160
others like Safe and Cow Swap. 
At the center is Nosis Chain. 

18
00:01:03,640 --> 00:01:08,040
It's a low fee layer one with 0 
downtime in seven years and 

19
00:01:08,040 --> 00:01:10,040
secured by over 300,000 
validators. 

20
00:01:10,440 --> 00:01:13,120
It's the foundation for real 
world financial applications 

21
00:01:13,120 --> 00:01:17,280
like Nosis Pay and Circles. 
All of this is governed by Nosis

22
00:01:17,280 --> 00:01:20,240
Dow, a community run 
organization where anyone with a

23
00:01:20,400 --> 00:01:24,720
GNO token can vote on updates, 
fund new projects, and even run 

24
00:01:24,720 --> 00:01:27,640
a validator from home. 
So if you're building in Web 3 

25
00:01:27,840 --> 00:01:30,240
or you're just curious about 
what financial freedom can look 

26
00:01:30,240 --> 00:01:33,160
like, start exploring at Nosis 
dot IO. 

27
00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:35,480
Welcome to the epicenter of the 
show, which talks about the 

28
00:01:35,480 --> 00:01:38,160
technologies, projects, and 
people driving decentralization 

29
00:01:38,160 --> 00:01:41,160
and the blockchain revolution. 
I'm so I think with you and I'm 

30
00:01:41,160 --> 00:01:45,320
here with Yelena Jurek, who is 
the CEO at Noble. 

31
00:01:45,320 --> 00:01:49,680
Noble is a Cosmos chain that's 
purpose built for native 

32
00:01:49,680 --> 00:01:54,720
issuance of stable coins and RW 
as they are one of the key 

33
00:01:54,720 --> 00:01:59,360
players in the USDC ecosystem. 
I believe they're probably 5th 

34
00:01:59,360 --> 00:02:02,240
or 6th in issuance. 
Now you'll correct me on Yelena,

35
00:02:02,240 --> 00:02:04,240
but if, if I think I'd check 
USDC dot cool. 

36
00:02:04,240 --> 00:02:07,320
And you guys are sitting at 
somewhere around $350 million if

37
00:02:07,320 --> 00:02:10,680
USDC issued on Noble. 
You also have your own USD 

38
00:02:10,680 --> 00:02:12,440
stablecoin USD and which we'll 
talk about. 

39
00:02:12,640 --> 00:02:15,360
But yeah, how, how you doing? 
How's how's everything going for

40
00:02:15,360 --> 00:02:17,920
you? 
Yeah, No, thanks so much for 

41
00:02:17,920 --> 00:02:20,320
having me on Seb. 
It's been great. 

42
00:02:20,360 --> 00:02:25,360
Obviously it's stablecoin summer
that is going into the fall. 

43
00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:27,960
I guess now that it's October 
1st, it's been great. 

44
00:02:27,960 --> 00:02:30,640
There's a lot of things going 
on, obviously the stablecoin 

45
00:02:30,640 --> 00:02:33,000
space and I'm excited to talk 
about that and also some 

46
00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:34,400
exciting updates on the Noble 
front. 

47
00:02:34,400 --> 00:02:37,720
So thanks for having. 
Me so like stablecoin you, you 

48
00:02:37,760 --> 00:02:42,160
mentioned stablecoin summer and 
and actually I think you're it's

49
00:02:42,160 --> 00:02:47,640
a very apartment way to talk 
about it because the stable mark

50
00:02:47,840 --> 00:02:52,360
the stablecoin market is now 
surpassed 250 billion. 

51
00:02:53,240 --> 00:02:57,440
It's up, I think something like 
45% this year alone. 

52
00:02:57,720 --> 00:03:00,200
There's much clearer USUS rules 
now. 

53
00:03:00,200 --> 00:03:04,960
We have lots of announcements. 
Also, if you hear Paxos just 

54
00:03:04,960 --> 00:03:06,920
announced their privacy focus 
stablecoin. 

55
00:03:07,120 --> 00:03:11,520
I also read that Circle is going
to enable things like reversible

56
00:03:11,520 --> 00:03:13,840
transactions. 
Obviously we have like plasma 

57
00:03:13,840 --> 00:03:15,520
that's just launched their 
neobank. 

58
00:03:15,720 --> 00:03:18,960
It seems like everyone is trying
to get a, a piece of the stable 

59
00:03:19,080 --> 00:03:24,160
pie coin coin pie. 
And you know, a little, a little

60
00:03:24,200 --> 00:03:27,400
bit reminds me of other hype 
cycles we have in the space like

61
00:03:27,600 --> 00:03:30,680
NFTS and and defy summer and 
meme coins. 

62
00:03:30,680 --> 00:03:34,080
And you know, if we look at 
those, a lot of that innovation 

63
00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:36,640
and certainly the valuations 
have dropped off a lot. 

64
00:03:38,080 --> 00:03:39,760
Why is stable coins different? 
Why? 

65
00:03:39,760 --> 00:03:42,160
Why should we treat stable coins
differently? 

66
00:03:42,160 --> 00:03:43,480
Should we treat stable coins 
differently? 

67
00:03:43,760 --> 00:03:48,200
Will we still be at this level 
of hype and excitement in a year

68
00:03:48,200 --> 00:03:50,760
from now? 
Yeah, it's a, it's a really good

69
00:03:50,760 --> 00:03:53,040
question. 
So I think it's important to 

70
00:03:53,040 --> 00:03:55,680
distinguish to your question 
like what is different about 

71
00:03:55,680 --> 00:03:57,400
about this, about this time 
around. 

72
00:03:57,800 --> 00:04:02,240
I think inevitably, you know, 
there will be overhyped projects

73
00:04:02,240 --> 00:04:05,400
that maybe don't sustain 
themselves and don't last into 

74
00:04:05,680 --> 00:04:08,040
functioning products and 
businesses. 

75
00:04:08,040 --> 00:04:12,560
But Despite that potentiality, 
there is something concrete kind

76
00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:18,240
of happening now, which is maybe
different than previous hype 

77
00:04:18,240 --> 00:04:21,040
cycles that we've had in crypto.
You know, to your point, whether

78
00:04:21,040 --> 00:04:22,840
that's NFTS or mean coins or the
like. 

79
00:04:23,200 --> 00:04:26,120
And that reason is, is pretty 
simple. 

80
00:04:26,120 --> 00:04:29,680
That's legislation, right? 
So we had obviously the passing 

81
00:04:29,680 --> 00:04:33,640
of genius a couple of months ago
where it was signed into law by 

82
00:04:33,640 --> 00:04:36,880
President Trump. 
We've had a very concerted 

83
00:04:37,560 --> 00:04:43,400
effort by multiple interest 
groups, right, that actually 

84
00:04:43,400 --> 00:04:47,240
want to see Genius operational 
and in full force. 

85
00:04:47,920 --> 00:04:52,000
One part of that interest group,
of course is the crypto lobby, 

86
00:04:52,000 --> 00:04:54,280
but it's also actually bigger 
than that, right? 

87
00:04:54,480 --> 00:04:58,600
Basically what Genius is simply 
a revolution in payments, right?

88
00:04:58,600 --> 00:05:02,400
And so if you think about like 
the payments industry and you 

89
00:05:02,400 --> 00:05:05,560
think about kind of what 
payments are and how payments 

90
00:05:05,560 --> 00:05:09,480
kind of work today, it's pretty 
antiquated, right? 

91
00:05:09,720 --> 00:05:13,200
And a lot of this payments 
infrastructure is running on 

92
00:05:13,200 --> 00:05:18,040
legacy infrastructure that is 
pretty old, antiquated. 

93
00:05:18,360 --> 00:05:21,360
And So what is genius? 
Genius basically set the 

94
00:05:21,360 --> 00:05:27,320
standard, a legal framework to 
issue stable coins as payment 

95
00:05:27,320 --> 00:05:30,040
instruments, right? 
And obviously, you know, for 

96
00:05:30,040 --> 00:05:32,400
crypto native people such as 
ourselves, we've been very 

97
00:05:32,400 --> 00:05:34,920
familiar with stablecoins for 
quite some time. 

98
00:05:35,280 --> 00:05:38,320
You know, some of us maybe you 
know, do payroll in stablecoins,

99
00:05:38,320 --> 00:05:41,240
get paid in stablecoins 
ourselves as employees myself, 

100
00:05:41,280 --> 00:05:43,960
I've paid rent in stablecoins in
the past. 

101
00:05:44,320 --> 00:05:48,400
You know, we're very familiar 
with these products, not to 

102
00:05:48,400 --> 00:05:50,760
mention the trading defy use 
cases. 

103
00:05:51,200 --> 00:05:55,560
But if you think about what 
Genius is and the framework it 

104
00:05:55,560 --> 00:05:59,960
establishes kind of on more 
mainstream legacy level, it 

105
00:05:59,960 --> 00:06:04,520
actually allows first of all, 
like legacy payments businesses 

106
00:06:05,000 --> 00:06:09,840
to like legally, let's say, 
innovate and, you know, offer 

107
00:06:09,840 --> 00:06:13,720
really interesting, you know, 
kind of innovative products that

108
00:06:13,720 --> 00:06:17,080
maybe are cheaper, more seamless
excetera. 

109
00:06:17,480 --> 00:06:20,400
But then it also allows crypto 
projects like Noble to kind of 

110
00:06:20,400 --> 00:06:23,160
play a role within that. 
So yeah, as you said, right now 

111
00:06:23,160 --> 00:06:25,200
it's about a $275 billion 
market. 

112
00:06:25,440 --> 00:06:29,400
Citibank just, you know, they 
had a report that said that by 

113
00:06:29,400 --> 00:06:34,200
20-30 will be at 1.6 trillion. 
They then actually upped that 

114
00:06:34,960 --> 00:06:37,840
prediction to 1.9 trillion by by
20-30. 

115
00:06:38,680 --> 00:06:41,400
And I'm like, let's remember, 
like five years ago or 5 1/2 

116
00:06:41,400 --> 00:06:43,040
years ago, we were at half a 
billion. 

117
00:06:43,440 --> 00:06:46,120
So yeah, I mean, today, you 
know, today in the last year, 

118
00:06:46,120 --> 00:06:49,320
we're up 50%. 
But basically, we have a much, 

119
00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:53,200
much longer way to go. 
And that is in a large part due 

120
00:06:53,200 --> 00:06:58,040
to genius and the appetite from 
the legacy mainstream world to 

121
00:06:58,040 --> 00:07:02,720
basically bring payment into the
21st century. 

122
00:07:02,840 --> 00:07:06,400
Yeah. 
I think one of the key insights 

123
00:07:06,400 --> 00:07:09,720
in what you just said is that it
enables or what I take away from

124
00:07:09,720 --> 00:07:13,840
it is that it enables a new form
of infrastructure for payment, 

125
00:07:14,520 --> 00:07:18,480
for payment issuance issuers, 
for payment systems issuers. 

126
00:07:18,480 --> 00:07:23,280
And in many ways that's I think 
what we've kind of wanted block 

127
00:07:23,280 --> 00:07:26,520
chains to be. 
You know, there's this idea that

128
00:07:26,560 --> 00:07:28,560
sort of been circulating for a 
long time now. 

129
00:07:28,560 --> 00:07:32,840
It's like that we want block 
chains and D5 to be the rails of

130
00:07:32,840 --> 00:07:38,320
the financial system. 
And I, I feel like stable coins 

131
00:07:38,320 --> 00:07:42,560
may be the catalyst that 
actually makes that finally the 

132
00:07:42,560 --> 00:07:44,880
case, right? 
It sort of makes it possible. 

133
00:07:45,120 --> 00:07:49,360
And so like this, this sort of 
institutional sentiment has 

134
00:07:49,360 --> 00:07:53,200
really flipped. 
I think Coindesk had this figure

135
00:07:53,200 --> 00:07:57,480
that 83% of investors are now 
planning more crypto exposure. 

136
00:07:58,760 --> 00:08:00,640
Stable coins, I think are a big 
part of that because there's 

137
00:08:00,640 --> 00:08:03,760
yield, you know, a lot of stable
coins are sort of promising 

138
00:08:03,760 --> 00:08:07,480
yield. 
How do you look at that? 

139
00:08:07,680 --> 00:08:12,840
And you know, how should, how 
should investors, institutional 

140
00:08:12,840 --> 00:08:15,920
or even retail? 
So it would be assessing the 

141
00:08:15,920 --> 00:08:20,720
different yield sources, right? 
Because 4.5% over here, 10% over

142
00:08:20,720 --> 00:08:24,200
here may, may not be, you know, 
not all yield is created equal. 

143
00:08:24,600 --> 00:08:27,360
And I think people need to be 
more familiar and sort of aware 

144
00:08:27,360 --> 00:08:30,200
of that. 
How do you look at that? 

145
00:08:31,280 --> 00:08:33,600
Yeah. 
Well, well, OK, so I mean, first

146
00:08:33,600 --> 00:08:35,080
of all, like, let me just back 
it up for a second. 

147
00:08:35,080 --> 00:08:37,840
So basically, you know, to your 
point, obviously like the 

148
00:08:37,840 --> 00:08:42,039
promise of blockchain rails was 
of course, you know, a lot of 

149
00:08:42,039 --> 00:08:46,600
the kind of use cases and kind 
of ideals was around payments. 

150
00:08:46,600 --> 00:08:48,560
It was, you know, peer-to-peer 
payment systems. 

151
00:08:48,560 --> 00:08:52,080
Obviously this idea of financial
disintermediation, even in the 

152
00:08:52,080 --> 00:08:55,600
original Bitcoin white paper, 
you had this vision for Bitcoin 

153
00:08:55,600 --> 00:08:59,040
as a payments mechanism. 
Of course, that is now not the 

154
00:08:59,040 --> 00:09:01,920
case. 
Bitcoin is not used as you know 

155
00:09:01,960 --> 00:09:04,800
most often and in the majority 
of cases is not used as a 

156
00:09:04,800 --> 00:09:08,400
payment instrument. 
It's it's obviously a 

157
00:09:08,400 --> 00:09:11,320
speculative asset that is traded
and you know at this point quite

158
00:09:11,320 --> 00:09:14,320
commoditized. 
So on the one hand, like it did 

159
00:09:14,320 --> 00:09:18,120
take us actually quite some time
to get to this point where we 

160
00:09:18,120 --> 00:09:20,120
actually do have the 
infrastructure and we actually 

161
00:09:20,120 --> 00:09:24,240
have stable points again, as a 
product that are instruments 

162
00:09:24,240 --> 00:09:28,480
that will not only have, you 
know, very sound legislation 

163
00:09:28,480 --> 00:09:31,480
kind of governing their, their 
utility, but we also have the 

164
00:09:31,480 --> 00:09:34,600
infrastructure and the actual, 
again, blockchain rails kind of 

165
00:09:34,600 --> 00:09:39,800
ready and able to transmit and 
proliferate these stable coins 

166
00:09:39,800 --> 00:09:44,560
across, you know, a wide variety
of use cases and distribution 

167
00:09:44,560 --> 00:09:46,880
channels. 
And so I will just emphasize, 

168
00:09:46,880 --> 00:09:50,080
like before we talk about like 
yield and stable coins that 

169
00:09:50,400 --> 00:09:54,720
really it's only now I would say
that we've had again, like 

170
00:09:54,720 --> 00:09:59,920
proper scalable infrastructure, 
like ready to take stable coins 

171
00:09:59,920 --> 00:10:03,520
to the masses. 
And I would also like kind of 

172
00:10:03,520 --> 00:10:05,720
love to talk about why that is 
and how far we've come. 

173
00:10:05,720 --> 00:10:08,360
And again, like what is this 
infrastructure that we're 

174
00:10:08,360 --> 00:10:12,520
talking about that is suited for
us bringing stablecoins to 

175
00:10:12,520 --> 00:10:14,400
mainstream? 
But yeah, to your question 

176
00:10:14,400 --> 00:10:16,320
around yield, I mean, it's 
interesting, right? 

177
00:10:16,320 --> 00:10:19,720
So first of all, when we talk 
about like yield as released to 

178
00:10:19,720 --> 00:10:22,440
stablecoins, we're typically 
talking about yield that is 

179
00:10:22,440 --> 00:10:25,240
generated from short term 
treasury bills. 

180
00:10:25,560 --> 00:10:31,160
Obviously that is the mechanism 
that I would call classic 

181
00:10:31,280 --> 00:10:34,800
traditional staple coins are 
collateralized by. 

182
00:10:35,760 --> 00:10:40,400
And so obviously with ingenious,
there is very clear distinctions

183
00:10:40,400 --> 00:10:41,880
around how that yield is passed 
on. 

184
00:10:41,880 --> 00:10:47,440
So kind of out-of-the-box, it's 
actually not compliant to pass 

185
00:10:47,440 --> 00:10:50,040
on that yield sort of passively,
right. 

186
00:10:50,720 --> 00:10:54,480
So you have to basically have a 
mechanism where that yield is 

187
00:10:54,480 --> 00:10:58,800
claimed or where distribution 
kind of and partners or entities

188
00:10:58,840 --> 00:11:01,960
like a coin base can actually 
take that USDC and pass on the 

189
00:11:01,960 --> 00:11:05,080
yield by having, you know, 
people, you know, hold that USTC

190
00:11:05,080 --> 00:11:07,960
on the Coinbase platform. 
So there is a bit a bit of 

191
00:11:07,960 --> 00:11:12,840
nuance and like legally how 
stable coins, you know, are, you

192
00:11:12,840 --> 00:11:17,360
know, able to pass on yield. 
And another big part of this 

193
00:11:17,360 --> 00:11:19,800
question, of course, is the 
clarity Act. 

194
00:11:19,800 --> 00:11:24,320
And basically that is more 
governing like Iran D5 and just 

195
00:11:24,320 --> 00:11:26,840
generally kind of, you know, 
crypto tokens are perhaps are 

196
00:11:26,840 --> 00:11:29,320
more speculative, but that will 
also kind of have some 

197
00:11:29,320 --> 00:11:31,920
guidelines on again, like 
passing of yield and how that's 

198
00:11:31,920 --> 00:11:37,400
some kind of compliant and 
basically for for for noble. 

199
00:11:37,400 --> 00:11:39,960
And this is like one of the 
principles that we have held 

200
00:11:39,960 --> 00:11:46,080
very dear to our heart since the
beginning is Noble is neutral 

201
00:11:46,080 --> 00:11:50,120
purpose built infrastructure for
the transmission and 

202
00:11:50,120 --> 00:11:54,040
proliferation of the stabacoins.
So Noble itself is a protocol, 

203
00:11:54,040 --> 00:11:55,600
OK? 
Noble itself is a layer one. 

204
00:11:55,600 --> 00:11:59,480
We of course are not ourselves a
Stabacoin issuer. 

205
00:11:59,920 --> 00:12:02,360
You kind of mentioned in the 
intro that we have Noble dollar.

206
00:12:02,640 --> 00:12:07,200
We're of course working with N 0
on that product. 

207
00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:14,240
N 0 is a stable coin issuance 
protocol which works with a 

208
00:12:14,240 --> 00:12:17,840
network of off chain mentors and
issuers. 

209
00:12:17,880 --> 00:12:21,280
Recently, Stripe or Bridge was 
announced as one of their 

210
00:12:21,280 --> 00:12:24,720
partners. 
But basically, Noble is distinct

211
00:12:24,720 --> 00:12:28,200
from the circles or the stripes 
of the world in the sense that 

212
00:12:28,200 --> 00:12:31,720
we are crypto infrastructure 
again, for the transmission of 

213
00:12:31,720 --> 00:12:34,360
these stable coins, right? 
So we like to work with wide 

214
00:12:34,360 --> 00:12:38,400
variety, diverse set of issuers.
And so, yeah, to your question 

215
00:12:38,400 --> 00:12:41,840
around, I guess, like yield and 
like how this will kind of play 

216
00:12:41,840 --> 00:12:44,320
out, I would say it's like the 
issuers themselves are kind of 

217
00:12:44,320 --> 00:12:45,800
at the forefront of these 
discussions. 

218
00:12:45,800 --> 00:12:48,600
Like again, when it comes to 
Noble, we are crypto native. 

219
00:12:49,280 --> 00:12:53,960
Obviously, D5 will continue to 
exist, but as an issuer, that 

220
00:12:54,080 --> 00:12:57,760
kind of consideration or and how
you pass on the yield, if at all

221
00:12:58,000 --> 00:13:00,920
to end users is basically within
their purview, right? 

222
00:13:00,920 --> 00:13:04,600
So basically you're going to 
have a situation where obviously

223
00:13:04,600 --> 00:13:08,280
you know, like what currently 
exists, which will probably what

224
00:13:08,640 --> 00:13:11,520
be the reality kind of after 
Genius is operationalized. 

225
00:13:11,520 --> 00:13:13,560
But you'll have a situation 
where the issuer themselves, 

226
00:13:13,560 --> 00:13:16,560
like a circle can't by default 
pass on that yield. 

227
00:13:16,720 --> 00:13:21,480
But the distribution partner, 
like a Coinbase, like an Ave. 

228
00:13:22,200 --> 00:13:26,560
like a finance, really any 
entity, whether it's an exchange

229
00:13:26,880 --> 00:13:33,680
or even a defy protocol, can of 
course, you know, pass on yield 

230
00:13:33,680 --> 00:13:36,600
in in in ways that is like safe 
and, you know, makes sense. 

231
00:13:36,920 --> 00:13:39,720
So anyways, we can, we can chat 
a little bit more about that 

232
00:13:39,720 --> 00:13:43,040
and, and how kind of noble 
thinks about it with composable 

233
00:13:43,040 --> 00:13:47,400
yield as it was to noble dollar.
But basically the rules are just

234
00:13:47,400 --> 00:13:53,800
like now being established and 
there's no one path yet because 

235
00:13:53,800 --> 00:13:58,440
the rules of the road have yet 
to be written by the OCC in the 

236
00:13:58,640 --> 00:14:01,960
US as it relates to things like 
passing on yield. 

237
00:14:02,800 --> 00:14:04,680
Well, I'm, I'm glad you brought 
up composable yield because I 

238
00:14:04,680 --> 00:14:07,280
think it's a, it's a perfect 
segue into the next question I 

239
00:14:07,280 --> 00:14:09,720
wanted to ask you, which is 
currently I think most of the 

240
00:14:09,720 --> 00:14:12,560
yield that these, you know, this
kind of floor that we see around

241
00:14:12,560 --> 00:14:16,120
like 444 or 5% your comes from 
treasuries. 

242
00:14:16,120 --> 00:14:19,320
You mentioned short term and 
long term treasuries and, and 

243
00:14:19,320 --> 00:14:22,240
having some of the mix there 
stable coins, You know, recently

244
00:14:22,240 --> 00:14:25,800
we had cap on, we also had FX 
protocol and of course, like 

245
00:14:25,800 --> 00:14:28,400
these are, these are stable coin
issuers, like different from, 

246
00:14:28,920 --> 00:14:31,640
from, from Noble, but they're 
generating yield in different 

247
00:14:31,640 --> 00:14:33,800
ways. 
Like FX has a stability pool 

248
00:14:33,800 --> 00:14:37,600
that generates yield basically 
from, you know, sort of deposits

249
00:14:37,600 --> 00:14:41,640
in its per protocol. 
You know, I, I feel like 

250
00:14:41,640 --> 00:14:44,680
probably, you know, we, we can, 
we can keep juicing these yields

251
00:14:44,680 --> 00:14:47,640
for some time, but they'll 
probably dry up like the native 

252
00:14:47,640 --> 00:14:52,040
Defy yields will start drying up
unless new sources of yield 

253
00:14:52,040 --> 00:14:55,560
start coming on chain, actual 
cash flows from off chain 

254
00:14:55,560 --> 00:14:58,760
businesses. 
So, yeah, how do you think about

255
00:14:58,760 --> 00:15:01,960
sort of like the bringing more 
yield on chain and how are you 

256
00:15:01,960 --> 00:15:06,520
guys integrating that into this 
so your yield strategy and 

257
00:15:06,520 --> 00:15:09,840
composable yield moving forward?
Yeah. 

258
00:15:09,880 --> 00:15:12,240
I mean composable yield is 
actually quite simple and we 

259
00:15:12,240 --> 00:15:14,920
don't like to complicate things 
As it relates to noble dollar 

260
00:15:14,920 --> 00:15:18,000
itself, like the core product 
obviously there's like, you 

261
00:15:18,000 --> 00:15:20,040
know, kind of funky things that 
could be built on top of that. 

262
00:15:20,040 --> 00:15:23,440
But as it relates to noble 
dollar itself, composable yield 

263
00:15:23,920 --> 00:15:28,480
basically is as follows. 
So you have USDN which is 

264
00:15:28,720 --> 00:15:33,320
actually over collateralized 
103% by by short term treasury 

265
00:15:33,320 --> 00:15:36,040
bills. 
Of course that collateral pool 

266
00:15:36,040 --> 00:15:43,680
is again managed and governed by
the M0 protocol, but our 

267
00:15:43,680 --> 00:15:47,040
implementation of USDN takes 
that yield component and 

268
00:15:47,040 --> 00:15:51,480
basically makes it programmable 
and programmatic at the same 

269
00:15:51,480 --> 00:15:54,360
time. 
So we tell distribution partners

270
00:15:54,360 --> 00:15:57,600
or we you know encourage 
distribution partners like like 

271
00:15:57,680 --> 00:16:02,800
a, like a, like a DEX, a 
payments app really can be off 

272
00:16:02,800 --> 00:16:05,240
chain distribution. 
On chain distribution, we really

273
00:16:05,240 --> 00:16:10,920
don't distinguish. 
We basically say take that yield

274
00:16:10,920 --> 00:16:15,000
accumulation that is kind of 
happening in real time or per 

275
00:16:15,000 --> 00:16:21,080
block basis and you can program 
it and direct it to any source 

276
00:16:21,280 --> 00:16:24,040
or any destination that kind of 
fits your use case. 

277
00:16:24,040 --> 00:16:26,840
So you can obviously take that 
yield revenue and you can 

278
00:16:26,840 --> 00:16:29,440
distribute it to validators. 
You can do a buy and burn of 

279
00:16:29,440 --> 00:16:31,280
your token, you can keep it as 
revenue. 

280
00:16:31,640 --> 00:16:37,400
And basically Noble's thesis 
again is on chain distribution, 

281
00:16:37,720 --> 00:16:41,360
it's making sure that the Noble 
protocol can service app 

282
00:16:41,360 --> 00:16:44,720
builders and make sure that 
there is proper incentives and 

283
00:16:44,720 --> 00:16:48,320
like safety and like liability 
around that distribution of the 

284
00:16:48,320 --> 00:16:51,680
underlying T bill yield. 
And we've had some pretty, 

285
00:16:51,760 --> 00:16:55,480
pretty good success. 
So a few months ago, we ran a 

286
00:16:55,480 --> 00:16:58,800
points campaign where we wanted 
to kind of demonstrate like this

287
00:16:58,800 --> 00:17:00,480
utility of composable yield, 
right? 

288
00:17:00,480 --> 00:17:03,880
And so we basically said, OK, so
people can participate in this 

289
00:17:03,880 --> 00:17:07,040
points campaign, they can get, 
you know, points, Noble points 

290
00:17:07,040 --> 00:17:09,760
by deposit, causing their noble 
dollar into the into a points 

291
00:17:09,760 --> 00:17:12,599
vault. 
But by doing so, you actually 

292
00:17:12,920 --> 00:17:18,440
forfeit or give up the T bill 
yield that you would otherwise 

293
00:17:18,680 --> 00:17:22,319
get by holding noble dollar. 
And what happened to that T bill

294
00:17:22,319 --> 00:17:26,359
yield that actually got 
distributed to a second vault, 

295
00:17:26,359 --> 00:17:30,080
which was a boosted yield vault.
And basically we sold people. 

296
00:17:30,080 --> 00:17:33,280
You can also just, you know, 
deposit your USDN into this 

297
00:17:33,280 --> 00:17:36,400
boosted yield vault where you 
don't get points, but you get 

298
00:17:36,400 --> 00:17:38,760
all of the yield that the people
in the points vault gave up. 

299
00:17:39,360 --> 00:17:42,680
And that was generating about 15
to 20% yield. 

300
00:17:43,920 --> 00:17:45,720
And that ran for about four or 
five months. 

301
00:17:46,240 --> 00:17:50,720
And basically, you know why we 
did that. 

302
00:17:50,720 --> 00:17:53,320
And like a lot of people were 
kind of asking, well, how you 

303
00:17:53,320 --> 00:17:55,240
know, how is that 50% yield 
generated? 

304
00:17:55,240 --> 00:17:57,160
Like is there something like 
happening on the back end like 

305
00:17:57,600 --> 00:18:02,440
like like through like lending 
or something funky in that way? 

306
00:18:02,440 --> 00:18:05,680
And the answer was no. 
Like it's literally 

307
00:18:05,880 --> 00:18:09,800
fundamentally treasury bill 
yield that just got 

308
00:18:09,800 --> 00:18:15,360
redistributed in a way that was 
quite simple if you think about 

309
00:18:15,360 --> 00:18:19,480
it, where it was basically all 
the people that gave it up, it 

310
00:18:19,480 --> 00:18:23,840
just got redirected to this 
other group of of holders. 

311
00:18:24,200 --> 00:18:26,840
And the reason we were able to 
do 15, you know, to 20% 

312
00:18:26,840 --> 00:18:29,720
consistently was because 
obviously overwhelmingly the 

313
00:18:30,640 --> 00:18:34,280
distribution or the ratio of 
deposits was within the points 

314
00:18:34,480 --> 00:18:36,640
vault. 
And so basically, you know, on 

315
00:18:36,640 --> 00:18:40,840
the one hand, we want to show, 
you know, noble dollar, look, 

316
00:18:40,840 --> 00:18:44,120
it's like a thing that exists. 
It's very powerful. 

317
00:18:44,960 --> 00:18:47,480
And of course, the composable 
yield is this like kind of 

318
00:18:47,480 --> 00:18:51,840
interesting new mechanism where 
you can start implementing it 

319
00:18:51,840 --> 00:18:55,960
in, you know, a wide variety of 
ways and you could gamify it, 

320
00:18:55,960 --> 00:18:57,360
you could create incentives 
around that. 

321
00:18:57,360 --> 00:19:00,920
And again, it's all possible 
because the token itself has 

322
00:19:00,920 --> 00:19:06,200
been designed and engineered to 
allow for the composability of 

323
00:19:06,200 --> 00:19:07,840
that yield component. 
Makes sense? 

324
00:19:08,040 --> 00:19:11,680
And so the USDN campaign, how 
successful was it? 

325
00:19:11,880 --> 00:19:14,960
Yeah, it was quite. 
Successful, we reached about 125

326
00:19:14,960 --> 00:19:20,120
million at an all time high all 
organic demand across 30,000 

327
00:19:20,120 --> 00:19:24,720
unique wallets. 
And so, you know, it was very, 

328
00:19:24,920 --> 00:19:29,240
very great to see that kind of 
organic, you know, demand kind 

329
00:19:29,240 --> 00:19:32,200
of popping up. 
And yeah, I want to talk. 

330
00:19:32,200 --> 00:19:34,960
About Cosmos a little bit, I 
mean, so noble is a is a Cosmos 

331
00:19:34,960 --> 00:19:39,720
app chain and you know, launched
at a time, I think when Cosmos 

332
00:19:39,720 --> 00:19:45,960
was struggling from the downfall
of of UST, you know, quite quite

333
00:19:45,960 --> 00:19:47,760
some time afterwards. 
But I think like, you know, I 

334
00:19:47,760 --> 00:19:51,760
think UST and, and the collapse 
of, of Lumina, I think had 

335
00:19:53,280 --> 00:19:56,360
pretty significant impact on the
Cosmos ecosystem overall. 

336
00:19:56,360 --> 00:19:58,560
You know, feel like it's some of
the all time highs there. 

337
00:19:58,560 --> 00:20:02,400
And like the, the FT VS of most 
of the chains that were around 

338
00:20:02,400 --> 00:20:06,360
in 2020-2021, 2022, you know, a 
lot of liquidity got, you know, 

339
00:20:06,760 --> 00:20:10,840
removed out of the ecosystem in,
in one, one moment. 

340
00:20:11,880 --> 00:20:15,840
I, I think when, when noble came
online, a lot of people were 

341
00:20:15,840 --> 00:20:19,440
expecting lots of USD liquidity 
to come into Cosmos. 

342
00:20:19,440 --> 00:20:24,240
And some has, right, I mean, 350
million or, or some change, 

343
00:20:24,240 --> 00:20:26,280
right? 
Is is nothing to sneeze at DYDX 

344
00:20:26,280 --> 00:20:30,680
also coming to the ecosystem? 
At the same time, I think was 

345
00:20:31,320 --> 00:20:33,840
very much anticipated and, and 
people saw that as a positive 

346
00:20:33,840 --> 00:20:35,800
sign. 
And I, I think, I think the 

347
00:20:35,800 --> 00:20:38,040
option thesis generally. 
And so the sovereign option 

348
00:20:38,040 --> 00:20:41,560
thesis continues to stand up 
and, and, and people all across 

349
00:20:41,560 --> 00:20:44,240
the ecosystem, across crypto, I 
think still believe that's the 

350
00:20:44,240 --> 00:20:46,960
case. 
But the Cosmos ecosystem as as 

351
00:20:46,960 --> 00:20:50,560
the D Phi ecosystem has not 
really done very well in the 

352
00:20:50,560 --> 00:20:54,760
last, you know, two 2-3 years 
despite all of this, right? 

353
00:20:54,760 --> 00:20:57,960
Despite Noble coming there, 
despite having native USTC and 

354
00:20:57,960 --> 00:21:01,360
despite, you know, lots of 
chains of using Cosmos tech. 

355
00:21:01,400 --> 00:21:02,440
What's happening? 
What do you think? 

356
00:21:02,440 --> 00:21:05,320
Why do you think that is? 
Is Cosmos finally dead, Yellena?

357
00:21:05,320 --> 00:21:06,760
But I guess that's the question 
I want to ask you. 

358
00:21:06,840 --> 00:21:08,200
It's like, do you think? 
No, it's. 

359
00:21:08,200 --> 00:21:09,480
Not dead. 
Yeah. 

360
00:21:09,480 --> 00:21:15,920
I mean, I think it's kind of a 
misnomer of a question because 

361
00:21:15,920 --> 00:21:19,640
basically if you look at where 
Cosmos is, it's fundamentally 

362
00:21:19,640 --> 00:21:22,280
the stack, right? 
It's Tenderman, it's Comma BFT, 

363
00:21:22,280 --> 00:21:25,040
it's the SDK, it's Cosmosom, 
it's IBC. 

364
00:21:25,360 --> 00:21:29,600
And if you look at all metrics 
across those like levels of the 

365
00:21:29,600 --> 00:21:31,680
stack, it's actually quite 
strong. 

366
00:21:31,760 --> 00:21:35,800
What's not strong to your point 
is Cosmos native token 

367
00:21:35,800 --> 00:21:38,280
performances. 
So if you like look at a chart 

368
00:21:38,280 --> 00:21:41,960
or coin market cap and you kind 
of look at, you know, a token 

369
00:21:41,960 --> 00:21:45,480
that is like an IBC token that 
like launches like unfortunately

370
00:21:45,680 --> 00:21:48,960
there isn't as much, you know, 
retail kind of demand for those 

371
00:21:48,960 --> 00:21:51,200
tokens. 
It's, it's, you know, partially 

372
00:21:51,200 --> 00:21:54,960
why Noble of course is launching
this L2 on EBM, which is the 

373
00:21:54,960 --> 00:21:58,280
Noble app layer and why the 
Noble token will be an Ethereum 

374
00:21:58,280 --> 00:22:02,560
token, not a Cosmos token. 
But basically as it relates to 

375
00:22:02,640 --> 00:22:06,200
like the stack itself and it 
relates to adoption. 

376
00:22:06,200 --> 00:22:11,880
I mean, again, by all accounts, 
it is the most performing stack 

377
00:22:11,880 --> 00:22:16,640
to build an app chain, right? 
And whether you use IBC or not, 

378
00:22:17,360 --> 00:22:19,760
I think also kind of dictates 
whether you're kind of 

379
00:22:19,760 --> 00:22:22,840
considered to be like Cosmos. 
So like Noble, for example, 

380
00:22:22,840 --> 00:22:24,720
right? 
We of course are have IBC 

381
00:22:24,720 --> 00:22:28,000
out-of-the-box. 
We, you know, a lot of like 

382
00:22:28,000 --> 00:22:32,400
volume, of course, liquidity 
routing is, is, is via IBC. 

383
00:22:32,400 --> 00:22:34,760
But we also have CCTP circles 
bridge. 

384
00:22:34,960 --> 00:22:38,080
We also have wormhole. 
We also have hyperlane support, 

385
00:22:38,160 --> 00:22:42,400
you know, probably will have 
other bridges supported by, you 

386
00:22:42,400 --> 00:22:45,480
know, Chernobyl. 
And so, you know, I think that a

387
00:22:45,480 --> 00:22:47,640
lot of the times, you know, when
you kind of look at what 

388
00:22:47,640 --> 00:22:52,040
happened with Tara, like, you 
know, how much of Tara's success

389
00:22:52,320 --> 00:22:54,560
was because they were Cosmos or 
because they had a great 

390
00:22:54,560 --> 00:22:56,120
product. 
I would argue they had a great 

391
00:22:56,120 --> 00:22:58,600
product for its time. 
Obviously that was not 

392
00:22:58,600 --> 00:23:00,920
sustainable. 
Obviously, UST was fundamentally

393
00:23:00,920 --> 00:23:05,680
unsound, but you know, Anchor 
and what they, you know, did 

394
00:23:05,680 --> 00:23:10,120
with the Terra protocol was 
obviously, you know, very 

395
00:23:10,120 --> 00:23:13,280
valuable in some level. 
And that's why you had UST at a 

396
00:23:13,280 --> 00:23:15,720
$40 billion market cap. 
And, you know, you had, you 

397
00:23:15,720 --> 00:23:18,720
know, all of this like, like, 
you know, liquidity mining of 

398
00:23:18,720 --> 00:23:22,200
UST and you had these like 
crazy, like AP wise. 

399
00:23:22,200 --> 00:23:25,720
And anyways, you also have like 
a lot of like really great defy 

400
00:23:25,720 --> 00:23:28,840
on on Terra. 
And so basically, yeah, Terra 

401
00:23:28,840 --> 00:23:31,920
was Cosmos and it was Cosmos 
because it's the best way to 

402
00:23:31,920 --> 00:23:34,360
build an app chain. 
But they also have just had like

403
00:23:34,360 --> 00:23:38,160
a good product story and good 
use, like a like a really, you 

404
00:23:38,160 --> 00:23:41,880
know, bullish community. 
And so I think again, like, it's

405
00:23:41,880 --> 00:23:46,000
not to say that that can't 
happen again, right? 

406
00:23:46,000 --> 00:23:51,040
Like it's all about the product.
It's all about the, you know, 

407
00:23:51,160 --> 00:23:54,080
like what you're actually 
building, who's a four, is it 

408
00:23:54,080 --> 00:23:55,000
useful? 
Does it work? 

409
00:23:55,000 --> 00:23:57,040
Is it broken? 
Is is there a good UX? 

410
00:23:57,760 --> 00:24:00,280
All of these things. 
And so I think when you look at 

411
00:24:00,280 --> 00:24:03,080
like what's happened since UST 
collapsed, obviously there was a

412
00:24:03,080 --> 00:24:07,200
really serious bear market. 
You know, you had FTX, you had 

413
00:24:07,200 --> 00:24:11,560
Celsius bankruptcy, you had 
things happen. 

414
00:24:11,880 --> 00:24:15,880
And then what happened after 
that was somewhat of a bubble 

415
00:24:15,880 --> 00:24:18,520
market that was started 
basically within the salon and 

416
00:24:18,520 --> 00:24:21,080
ecosystem. 
Why product? 

417
00:24:21,240 --> 00:24:23,280
What was the product correct 
meme coins. 

418
00:24:23,680 --> 00:24:29,160
And so again, like Cosmos showed
you could build really 

419
00:24:29,160 --> 00:24:34,240
performant app chain 
infrastructure for D5, for 

420
00:24:34,240 --> 00:24:37,600
stable coins, for trading, for 
like all sorts of things. 

421
00:24:37,800 --> 00:24:43,120
Solana showed that you could get
incredible mindshare and retail 

422
00:24:43,120 --> 00:24:46,720
adoption of meme coins. 
And of course there is like some

423
00:24:46,720 --> 00:24:50,840
performance reason for that 
because of the way that Solana 

424
00:24:50,840 --> 00:24:54,560
works. 
But basically it's to say that 

425
00:24:54,960 --> 00:25:01,920
if you look at any major L1L2 
ecosystem, typically it's like 

426
00:25:02,200 --> 00:25:06,880
power law distribution of like 
where the activity and liquidity

427
00:25:06,880 --> 00:25:10,480
is and it's usually concentrated
among a handful of products and 

428
00:25:10,480 --> 00:25:12,760
applications. 
So like even salon it right, 

429
00:25:12,760 --> 00:25:17,040
like yes, pumped off on like 
kind of kicked off, you know, 

430
00:25:17,040 --> 00:25:21,880
the trend you had bonk you had 
obviously, you know, then 

431
00:25:21,880 --> 00:25:26,320
there's like things like Jido, 
but like overwhelmingly a lot of

432
00:25:26,320 --> 00:25:30,000
that activity and liquidity in 
mindshare was around pumped off 

433
00:25:30,000 --> 00:25:31,440
on. 
And then and you know, you look 

434
00:25:31,440 --> 00:25:34,080
at, you know, things like, you 
know, hyper liquid 

435
00:25:34,320 --> 00:25:37,640
overwhelmingly now that's kind 
of maintaining a lot of 

436
00:25:37,640 --> 00:25:42,120
mindshare. 
And so basically, you know, I 

437
00:25:42,120 --> 00:25:45,280
would say that on the one hand, 
Cosmos of course, can never be 

438
00:25:45,280 --> 00:25:49,320
done because you have the stack 
which will continue to be like 

439
00:25:49,320 --> 00:25:51,200
the best stack. 
Like I mean, even talk about 

440
00:25:51,200 --> 00:25:54,680
like stablecoin chains, like 
Circle, of course, is building 

441
00:25:54,920 --> 00:26:00,400
their stablecoin layer one 
pulled arc and that uses comet 

442
00:26:00,400 --> 00:26:04,680
BFT for consensus. 
You know, you have obviously 

443
00:26:04,680 --> 00:26:08,840
Noble, which of course leverages
some parts of the Cosmos stack 

444
00:26:08,840 --> 00:26:12,160
and of course has this like 
separate execution layer around 

445
00:26:12,160 --> 00:26:15,640
the EVM. 
But yeah, I think there's 

446
00:26:15,640 --> 00:26:19,360
definitely no logical way you 
could see that Cosmos is dead. 

447
00:26:20,440 --> 00:26:22,200
Yeah. 
That that that's, that's really 

448
00:26:22,200 --> 00:26:24,000
great. 
I think it it kind of aligns 

449
00:26:24,000 --> 00:26:28,080
with how I've seen and talked 
about Cosmos over the years and 

450
00:26:28,080 --> 00:26:32,960
and that the analogy I often use
is none of the none of the nerds

451
00:26:32,960 --> 00:26:36,000
that were fighting over the 
right distribution of Linux to 

452
00:26:36,000 --> 00:26:39,480
use back in the 90s got rich 
because Apple devices and every 

453
00:26:39,480 --> 00:26:43,240
Android device uses it uses a 
Linux kind of like core kernel. 

454
00:26:43,280 --> 00:26:46,120
The nerds will come at me and 
tell me that's what I said is is

455
00:26:46,120 --> 00:26:47,840
inaccurate. 
But but basically that, like 

456
00:26:47,840 --> 00:26:51,800
most devices nowadays use Linux 
infrastructure and I think 

457
00:26:51,800 --> 00:26:53,040
Cosmos is kind of similar, 
right. 

458
00:26:53,040 --> 00:26:57,120
It is it is really the best 
stack to build stop sovereign 

459
00:26:57,120 --> 00:27:00,200
app chain infrastructure. 
Just that you know, 

460
00:27:00,360 --> 00:27:03,880
unfortunately there isn't a 
mechanism by which Adam holders 

461
00:27:03,880 --> 00:27:07,480
get rich or sort of Cosmos token
holders get rich because your 

462
00:27:07,480 --> 00:27:11,040
circle built circle builds their
their app chain using a common 

463
00:27:11,040 --> 00:27:14,000
PFT. 
And and I think to some extent 

464
00:27:14,120 --> 00:27:18,160
Etherium does suffer a little 
bit from a similar fate with the

465
00:27:18,520 --> 00:27:23,120
roll up road map where value 
from all these roll ups doesn't 

466
00:27:23,120 --> 00:27:28,280
necessarily accrue to Ethereum. 
And but you know, the EDM is the

467
00:27:28,280 --> 00:27:31,000
best way to, you know, write 
smart contracts and write 

468
00:27:31,000 --> 00:27:33,400
applications on blockchains that
hasn't the most amount of 

469
00:27:33,400 --> 00:27:36,240
developers and etcetera. 
So I think a lot of stacks are 

470
00:27:36,240 --> 00:27:40,280
kind of reeling with the same 
sorts of problems of value 

471
00:27:40,280 --> 00:27:42,040
capture. 
And I don't know what the way 

472
00:27:42,040 --> 00:27:47,280
around us, you know, do we have 
licenses where those who use the

473
00:27:47,280 --> 00:27:51,200
stack for commercial purposes 
need to pay some, some fee or 

474
00:27:51,200 --> 00:27:53,240
some licensing fee back to the 
token holders? 

475
00:27:53,240 --> 00:27:55,200
I mean, it seems very difficult 
to manage. 

476
00:27:56,120 --> 00:27:59,120
So I, I don't know what the, 
what the solution is here. 

477
00:27:59,120 --> 00:28:01,000
Maybe the solution is just, I 
mean, maybe there isn't a 

478
00:28:01,000 --> 00:28:03,200
solution and just people have to
accept that just because 

479
00:28:03,200 --> 00:28:05,640
someone's using your stack 
doesn't mean that you or 

480
00:28:05,760 --> 00:28:08,880
someone's using the stack. 
That you know that that you 

481
00:28:08,880 --> 00:28:12,240
invested in some other token 
doesn't mean that you're 

482
00:28:12,240 --> 00:28:13,600
necessarily going to benefit 
from that. 

483
00:28:14,360 --> 00:28:16,760
Well, I'll give you like an 
analogy here. 

484
00:28:16,760 --> 00:28:22,000
Just because I have an app in 
the Apple App Store doesn't mean

485
00:28:22,000 --> 00:28:25,480
my app will be successful, 
right? 

486
00:28:26,560 --> 00:28:31,280
So. 
Just because I have quote UN 

487
00:28:31,280 --> 00:28:34,360
quote distribution through the 
App Store doesn't mean it's 

488
00:28:34,360 --> 00:28:38,120
going to be in the top 20 use 
apps because it has to 

489
00:28:38,120 --> 00:28:42,440
ultimately be a good app. 
So I think like this idea that 

490
00:28:42,440 --> 00:28:45,880
just because you're building 
something on Solana means, oh, 

491
00:28:45,880 --> 00:28:48,080
all of a sudden it's like the 
next pumped off fun, like 

492
00:28:48,320 --> 00:28:52,480
doesn't make any sense, right? 
Just because I'm building, you 

493
00:28:52,480 --> 00:28:56,800
know, on Ethereum means I'm 
going to now get all of the 

494
00:28:56,800 --> 00:29:00,000
liquidity of Ethereum defy. 
Like that doesn't make any 

495
00:29:00,000 --> 00:29:02,280
sense. 
So yeah, I mean, I think that 

496
00:29:02,280 --> 00:29:05,480
the same goes for Cosmos. 
I think the difference maybe is 

497
00:29:05,480 --> 00:29:09,200
because like from a narrative 
perspective, the app chain 

498
00:29:09,200 --> 00:29:12,120
thesis has been focused on apps,
right? 

499
00:29:12,400 --> 00:29:16,800
And so we understand like apps 
is where the value accrues. 

500
00:29:16,800 --> 00:29:20,520
And if you don't have a good 
app, then you won't get value 

501
00:29:20,520 --> 00:29:26,040
and neither will perhaps that 
value trickle out to other app 

502
00:29:26,040 --> 00:29:28,240
chains within that same 
ecosystem. 

503
00:29:28,640 --> 00:29:32,160
And so I think like with Terra, 
obviously we had a very 

504
00:29:32,160 --> 00:29:35,760
successful app, right, very 
successful app chain for its 

505
00:29:35,760 --> 00:29:37,680
time. 
And then of course, it destroy 

506
00:29:37,680 --> 00:29:39,960
itself. 
But what did that show? 

507
00:29:40,160 --> 00:29:43,200
It showed that value can accrue 
to the app player. 

508
00:29:43,200 --> 00:29:45,280
It could accrue to the app 
chain, it could accrue to the 

509
00:29:45,280 --> 00:29:48,400
token holders. 
And you know, you could argue, 

510
00:29:48,400 --> 00:29:50,920
oh, well, that's why, you know, 
other Cosmos app chains did 

511
00:29:50,920 --> 00:29:53,200
well. 
I think that's a bit of a 

512
00:29:53,200 --> 00:29:55,400
rewriting of history. 
Like it was also just generally 

513
00:29:55,400 --> 00:29:59,720
a bull market and many 
applications did well, not just 

514
00:29:59,880 --> 00:30:01,840
in a Cosmos, but also in 
Ethereum. 

515
00:30:02,640 --> 00:30:06,760
But basically, if like your only
source of like demand for your 

516
00:30:06,760 --> 00:30:11,560
token or your app is because 
like your, you know, neighbor is

517
00:30:11,560 --> 00:30:13,520
doing a good job, like that's 
not a sustainable Moat. 

518
00:30:13,520 --> 00:30:16,440
And so basically you have to 
kind of think about, OK, well, 

519
00:30:16,800 --> 00:30:18,880
how will distribution happen in 
the future? 

520
00:30:19,240 --> 00:30:22,600
Where will demand come from? 
What is the product? 

521
00:30:22,680 --> 00:30:25,280
Is it sustainable? 
Is there a Moat? 

522
00:30:25,680 --> 00:30:30,160
Is it easy to use? 
Is it differentiated? 

523
00:30:30,240 --> 00:30:33,720
So, you know, basically I think 
crypto people like have to build

524
00:30:33,720 --> 00:30:36,080
real businesses and I think 
that's a good thing. 

525
00:30:36,080 --> 00:30:41,720
And you know, I think Cosmos is 
still the stack itself is still 

526
00:30:41,720 --> 00:30:45,200
a very solid stack. 
Yeah, I agree. 

527
00:30:45,280 --> 00:30:48,760
I mean, I think all that makes 
sense and it bears repeating and

528
00:30:48,760 --> 00:30:52,160
it bears reminding ourselves and
folks in the ecosystem all 

529
00:30:52,160 --> 00:30:54,080
together. 
You know, that's Cosmos people. 

530
00:30:55,080 --> 00:30:57,880
I, I think the last time we 
spoke when you were on the 

531
00:30:57,880 --> 00:31:02,480
interop was quite a while ago 
and there was some you were 

532
00:31:02,480 --> 00:31:06,600
talking at that time about 
having an EVM on Noble. 

533
00:31:06,720 --> 00:31:10,320
How has that? 
Yeah, can can sort of share the 

534
00:31:10,320 --> 00:31:12,720
latest on that? 
Yeah. 

535
00:31:12,720 --> 00:31:15,920
So this is something we're we're
working towards and really 

536
00:31:15,920 --> 00:31:18,760
excited about. 
So we're going to be launching 

537
00:31:18,760 --> 00:31:20,240
something called Noble App 
Layer. 

538
00:31:20,840 --> 00:31:24,560
We'll probably be branding at 
something different, but for now

539
00:31:24,560 --> 00:31:25,960
we, we're calling it the Noble 
App layer. 

540
00:31:26,400 --> 00:31:29,920
And basically the Noble App 
layer is an EV ML2 using 

541
00:31:29,920 --> 00:31:32,920
Celestia for data availability. 
You know, kind of Speaking of 

542
00:31:32,920 --> 00:31:36,880
Cosmos, Speaking of the stack, 
there's quite a, you know, a few

543
00:31:36,880 --> 00:31:41,600
reasons why we decided to build 
the EVM component as an L2 

544
00:31:41,600 --> 00:31:46,320
versus adding it on top of the 
Noble L1, which of course is the

545
00:31:46,320 --> 00:31:48,400
Cosmocell one, which is 
currently, of course, in 

546
00:31:48,400 --> 00:31:51,320
production. 
And you know, quite, you know, 

547
00:31:51,360 --> 00:31:55,360
significant in terms of volume 
and routing and adoption. 

548
00:31:55,400 --> 00:31:59,840
And basically the reasons kind 
of are as follows. 1 You know, 

549
00:31:59,880 --> 00:32:02,840
there is a lot of exciting 
innovation taking place like in 

550
00:32:02,840 --> 00:32:06,440
the Etherium world as it relates
to performance. 

551
00:32:07,160 --> 00:32:11,880
You know, Celestia I think is 
obviously like a huge part of, 

552
00:32:12,800 --> 00:32:15,800
you know, what makes, I guess 
like if you're more delightful 

553
00:32:16,280 --> 00:32:19,360
to build on top of kind of given
their, you know, data 

554
00:32:19,360 --> 00:32:23,920
availability innovations. 
And so, you know, that's one 

555
00:32:23,920 --> 00:32:26,400
part of it. 
We wanted to, you know, also 

556
00:32:26,400 --> 00:32:31,320
make sure that we were exposed 
to the EVM ecosystem and just, 

557
00:32:31,360 --> 00:32:35,680
you know, historically EVM on 
Cosmos has been challenging to 

558
00:32:35,680 --> 00:32:39,280
say the least. 
And so, you know, we figured 

559
00:32:39,360 --> 00:32:43,280
first of all, there was a huge 
product need for smart contracts

560
00:32:43,320 --> 00:32:46,320
and programmability, you know, 
for Noble. 

561
00:32:46,440 --> 00:32:51,200
And adding an EVM layer on top 
of Noble was not necessarily the

562
00:32:51,200 --> 00:32:54,680
best engineering decision. 
And so we figured let's deploy 

563
00:32:55,640 --> 00:32:59,440
basically an L2 on top of Noble 
that would be validated and 

564
00:32:59,440 --> 00:33:02,640
secured by the Noble layer one, 
but which could act as a 

565
00:33:02,640 --> 00:33:05,560
distinct execution layer for 
sorry to. 

566
00:33:05,560 --> 00:33:10,280
Interrupt here, but even with 
the Cosmos sort of EDM stack, 

567
00:33:11,040 --> 00:33:15,920
yeah, curious why why you chose 
to do an L2 rather than use that

568
00:33:15,920 --> 00:33:17,960
stack which has the EDM kind of 
built into it? 

569
00:33:19,080 --> 00:33:23,400
Well, so so the EVM is actually 
not super like well maintained, 

570
00:33:23,400 --> 00:33:25,680
right. 
If you kind of look at like how 

571
00:33:25,680 --> 00:33:29,400
the EVM kind of software has 
developed over time, you have 

572
00:33:29,400 --> 00:33:33,920
like EVMOS now you have other 
kind of players attempting to 

573
00:33:33,920 --> 00:33:36,800
maintain that. 
But I mean, I'm sure you you 

574
00:33:36,800 --> 00:33:42,160
understand like EVM is as a as 
as as a software, you know, it 

575
00:33:42,160 --> 00:33:44,440
needs to be maintained to make 
sure that it's like secure and 

576
00:33:44,440 --> 00:33:47,160
that there's like, you know, de 
risking from like a bugs 

577
00:33:47,160 --> 00:33:50,720
perspective. 
And so basically we felt a lot 

578
00:33:50,720 --> 00:33:54,920
more comfortable in the 
maintenance and the, you know, 

579
00:33:54,920 --> 00:33:59,960
software of EVM proper kind of 
on you know, as it relates to 

580
00:33:59,960 --> 00:34:03,280
Etherium. 
So that was, you know, very much

581
00:34:03,280 --> 00:34:07,480
like a concern around, again, 
like stability, security, making

582
00:34:07,480 --> 00:34:11,159
sure we're always properly 
following major releases and 

583
00:34:11,159 --> 00:34:13,280
that the software that we use is
well maintained. 

584
00:34:13,520 --> 00:34:18,040
And so it just made sense to 
again, build this EVM app layer 

585
00:34:18,320 --> 00:34:20,760
basically as an L2 using 
Celestia for DA. 

586
00:34:21,159 --> 00:34:22,880
And then again, performance, 
right? 

587
00:34:22,880 --> 00:34:26,440
Like our EVM app layer. 
You know, I think like yesterday

588
00:34:26,760 --> 00:34:29,360
there were some benchmark 
testing and it's like 100 

589
00:34:29,360 --> 00:34:32,360
millisecond block times, right? 
Super fast. 

590
00:34:32,560 --> 00:34:34,199
That's faster than Noble Core, 
right? 

591
00:34:34,199 --> 00:34:39,159
Noble Core is like 1.2 seconds, 
which is fast, but it's not call

592
00:34:39,159 --> 00:34:45,199
it fast like like like the app 
layer which can support, you 

593
00:34:45,199 --> 00:34:48,000
know, all sorts of things that 
core can't support from like an 

594
00:34:48,000 --> 00:34:51,800
execution perspective. 
And so you know, that was an 

595
00:34:51,800 --> 00:34:54,000
obvious decision for us. 
Again, we love working with the 

596
00:34:54,000 --> 00:34:57,120
Celestia team. 
We think the you know, the, the 

597
00:34:57,120 --> 00:35:00,840
kind of software that is 
maintained again is very solid 

598
00:35:00,840 --> 00:35:02,360
and it just kind of made sense 
for us. 

599
00:35:02,560 --> 00:35:05,200
Also, again, like talking about 
like the power of like the 

600
00:35:05,200 --> 00:35:09,280
Cosmos stack, like, you know it,
not that this was like trivial 

601
00:35:09,280 --> 00:35:10,520
work. 
It was definitely a lot of hard 

602
00:35:10,520 --> 00:35:12,840
work. 
But there is also a world where 

603
00:35:12,840 --> 00:35:16,280
of course, Noble Core validates 
and secures the L2. 

604
00:35:16,280 --> 00:35:18,320
And that's also was a big part 
of the discussion. 

605
00:35:18,320 --> 00:35:22,000
Like can we have a single 
sequencer L2 running on Celestia

606
00:35:22,000 --> 00:35:26,080
DA secured by the Noble 
validator set in a very secure 

607
00:35:26,080 --> 00:35:27,720
manner? 
The answer was yes. 

608
00:35:27,720 --> 00:35:33,040
And so we're very excited to be 
basically championing that 

609
00:35:33,040 --> 00:35:35,800
model. 
I did a long tweet thread on 

610
00:35:35,800 --> 00:35:39,440
kind of what makes this model 
perhaps different than like 

611
00:35:39,440 --> 00:35:43,960
other kind of roll up designs 
within the Etherium space, which

612
00:35:43,960 --> 00:35:45,680
may be like we can link them in 
the notes. 

613
00:35:45,680 --> 00:35:50,520
But basically a lot of what 
we've done with the Noble Core 

614
00:35:50,600 --> 00:35:55,520
validating and securing the L2 
is very similar to kind of like 

615
00:35:55,520 --> 00:35:59,600
the native roll up vision that I
believe Italic and others put 

616
00:35:59,600 --> 00:36:01,920
forward. 
And yeah, we think it's pretty 

617
00:36:01,920 --> 00:36:03,440
interesting. 
I mean, of course it's different

618
00:36:03,440 --> 00:36:06,600
where the Noble Core is a proof 
of authority chain, right? 

619
00:36:06,600 --> 00:36:10,720
So we don't have like a proof of
stake kind of economic security 

620
00:36:10,720 --> 00:36:13,520
model with like, you know, a 
bunch of token stakes. 

621
00:36:14,040 --> 00:36:16,640
But we actually think that the 
proof of authority model works 

622
00:36:16,640 --> 00:36:20,440
very well for our use cases 
which are stable point centric. 

623
00:36:20,440 --> 00:36:25,600
So anyways, it's a lot of 
indifferent decision making 

624
00:36:25,600 --> 00:36:27,760
factors that kind of led us to 
where we are today. 

625
00:36:28,320 --> 00:36:31,400
But I think that kind of speaks 
to like our approach and our 

626
00:36:31,400 --> 00:36:34,200
philosophy, which is like, let's
be very methodical, let's be 

627
00:36:34,200 --> 00:36:37,440
very considerate around the 
architecture. 

628
00:36:38,000 --> 00:36:40,720
Let's talk rush things just 
because everyone else is doing 

629
00:36:40,720 --> 00:36:42,600
it one way. 
We, we, we want to make sure 

630
00:36:42,600 --> 00:36:45,640
that the way we do it fits our 
use case and fits our 

631
00:36:45,640 --> 00:36:48,600
principles. 
And basically, I do believe and 

632
00:36:48,800 --> 00:36:51,320
can anticipate that the launch 
of the app layer, it will be 

633
00:36:51,320 --> 00:36:54,520
like a new era for for Noble 
because again, we've never 

634
00:36:54,520 --> 00:36:59,040
actually had defy on Noble 
itself, which is kind of crazy. 

635
00:36:59,160 --> 00:37:00,560
And yet there's all of this 
traction. 

636
00:37:00,600 --> 00:37:05,160
So yeah, we'll see what happens.
And he talked a bit about the 

637
00:37:05,160 --> 00:37:09,720
role of the Noble token in this,
in this new L2 and and this D 

638
00:37:09,720 --> 00:37:12,640
Phi ecosystem that you want to 
build. 

639
00:37:12,840 --> 00:37:14,440
Yeah. 
Definitely. 

640
00:37:14,440 --> 00:37:16,480
And we'll have some really 
exciting announcements actually 

641
00:37:16,480 --> 00:37:17,960
on the Noble token very, very 
soon. 

642
00:37:18,400 --> 00:37:20,720
But at a high level, we're talk,
we're thinking of the Noble 

643
00:37:20,720 --> 00:37:25,080
token in like 2 ways. 
So one, it will be the base fee 

644
00:37:25,080 --> 00:37:29,120
token for the app layer. 
Basically will users can still 

645
00:37:29,360 --> 00:37:33,400
pay fees in stable coins as they
currently do on core, but 

646
00:37:33,400 --> 00:37:38,520
they'll be a mechanism where 
that fee, those fees are swapped

647
00:37:38,520 --> 00:37:41,080
into noble token kind of on the 
back end. 

648
00:37:41,120 --> 00:37:44,080
And there's like a kind of a 
pave masters like account system

649
00:37:44,400 --> 00:37:49,000
around the kind of fee fee 
mechanism for the app player, 

650
00:37:49,000 --> 00:37:50,480
which again is noble token under
the hood. 

651
00:37:51,120 --> 00:37:55,960
So again, assuming there's a lot
of activity and users and you 

652
00:37:55,960 --> 00:37:58,840
know, products on Noble App 
Player that are well adopted 

653
00:37:59,280 --> 00:38:01,000
that will be positive for the 
Noble token. 

654
00:38:01,400 --> 00:38:04,280
And then the other piece is 
actually governance. 

655
00:38:04,560 --> 00:38:10,840
So we are keeping the proof of 
authority model for validation. 

656
00:38:10,840 --> 00:38:15,240
So there will not most likely be
staking, but there will be 

657
00:38:15,240 --> 00:38:19,400
governance. 
What does that mean similar to, 

658
00:38:19,480 --> 00:38:22,000
you know, kind of other models 
where basically you could use 

659
00:38:22,000 --> 00:38:27,600
them like the governance token 
to have certain incentives or 

660
00:38:27,840 --> 00:38:34,880
have certain auctions for, let's
say, you know, deploying 

661
00:38:34,880 --> 00:38:39,280
liquidity into certain pools. 
You know what we call like 

662
00:38:39,280 --> 00:38:43,640
bribes in the Curve model where 
you have like AV, in this case 

663
00:38:43,640 --> 00:38:46,280
AV Noble token. 
That's all kind of on the road 

664
00:38:46,280 --> 00:38:48,200
map. 
And we actually think again, 

665
00:38:48,200 --> 00:38:51,800
defy is at this point battle 
tested and we have some pretty 

666
00:38:51,800 --> 00:38:54,360
interesting applications kind of
in the works. 

667
00:38:54,360 --> 00:38:56,760
And if you can layer in a Noble 
token on top of that where you 

668
00:38:56,760 --> 00:38:58,760
get the community kind of 
excited and incentive 

669
00:38:59,000 --> 00:39:02,040
incentivized and motivated to 
kind of govern those various 

670
00:39:02,040 --> 00:39:04,040
applications, I think there 
could be some interesting, 

671
00:39:04,920 --> 00:39:06,280
interesting things. 
Where do you? 

672
00:39:06,280 --> 00:39:11,000
Expect stablecoins to be in 
three to five years. 

673
00:39:11,000 --> 00:39:14,160
And what will be Noble's role in
that ecosystem? 

674
00:39:15,000 --> 00:39:17,440
Yeah. 
Honestly, I think it's just the 

675
00:39:17,440 --> 00:39:19,560
beginning. 
Obviously we have all of 

676
00:39:20,000 --> 00:39:24,440
plethora of purpose built 
stablecoin chains launching, 

677
00:39:24,800 --> 00:39:28,320
which I think is, is ultimately 
+1 of the ways that I like to 

678
00:39:28,320 --> 00:39:31,720
think about differentiation 
among those app chains. 

679
00:39:31,720 --> 00:39:35,400
And you know, perhaps nobles 
kind of roll with within that 

680
00:39:35,400 --> 00:39:38,600
differentiation is basically as 
follows, right? 

681
00:39:38,600 --> 00:39:43,640
The Tam for stablecoins, for 
stablecoins payments is massive,

682
00:39:43,680 --> 00:39:46,080
right? 
Like we mentioned earlier, this 

683
00:39:46,280 --> 00:39:49,440
kind of 1.9 trillion figure from
from city. 

684
00:39:49,640 --> 00:39:54,160
I I've seen, you know, I've seen
predictions as high as 4 

685
00:39:54,160 --> 00:39:56,160
trillion from financial 
institutions. 

686
00:39:56,640 --> 00:39:59,680
But if that is to be the case, 
you're going to have 

687
00:39:59,680 --> 00:40:02,800
specialization within the 
payments landscape that 

688
00:40:03,200 --> 00:40:07,080
basically leverages certain 
stable coin infrastructure, 

689
00:40:07,080 --> 00:40:09,640
right? 
So for Noble, if we think about 

690
00:40:09,640 --> 00:40:12,880
Noble's app layer, if you think 
about Noble core and performance

691
00:40:12,880 --> 00:40:16,400
and stability there, I do see 
Noble playing a significant role

692
00:40:16,720 --> 00:40:20,800
in this future payments kind of 
revolution around stable coins. 

693
00:40:21,040 --> 00:40:25,080
Whether that is more on the B to
C side, you know, it's something

694
00:40:25,080 --> 00:40:27,840
we can kind of anticipate. 
But we've had some pretty 

695
00:40:27,840 --> 00:40:31,120
exciting conversations with, you
know, legacy traditional players

696
00:40:31,400 --> 00:40:33,600
kind of coming into the space, 
looking at the space and and 

697
00:40:33,600 --> 00:40:37,600
saying basically we have a need 
to transform our payments 

698
00:40:37,600 --> 00:40:40,200
infrastructure. 
Let's think about how kind of 

699
00:40:40,200 --> 00:40:44,080
Noble and again, layer ones kind
of fit into that landscape. 

700
00:40:44,080 --> 00:40:47,760
So Noble will continue to always
exist as this kind of router of 

701
00:40:47,760 --> 00:40:52,800
activity, as a origin chain for 
the minting, for the redemption 

702
00:40:52,800 --> 00:40:55,360
of these stable coins because of
our performance, because of our 

703
00:40:55,360 --> 00:40:58,120
battle tested infrastructure. 
And basically we want to see 

704
00:40:58,120 --> 00:41:01,720
Noble and the app player do a 
lot of stuff on the consumer 

705
00:41:01,720 --> 00:41:04,200
facing side. 
So obviously it's early days, 

706
00:41:04,560 --> 00:41:08,320
but again, it's exciting days 
and there's a lot more to come. 

707
00:41:08,480 --> 00:41:09,240
Great. 
Well, you know. 

708
00:41:09,320 --> 00:41:12,280
Thanks for coming on the show. 
It's been great chatting with 

709
00:41:12,280 --> 00:41:15,120
you, getting an update on Noble 
and also getting a glimpse of 

710
00:41:15,120 --> 00:41:18,360
the future. 
So excited for Noble and the 

711
00:41:18,360 --> 00:41:20,040
things ahead. 
Amazing. 

712
00:41:20,040 --> 00:41:20,520
Thank. 
You, Seth.

