Hello, and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're talking about UFO warp.
Dr. That's correct, UFO warp drive.
Now a group of scientists have come together, and they think
they might have an idea of what these UFO's are powering
themselves on, how they're getting hushed so fast, and what
this all involves. And they're calling this a UFO
Warp Dr. where these UFO's can actually bend space and time and
gravity and get from point A to point B faster than the speed of
light. Now one of the really well
documented sightings that they're using to go forward with
this theory on is what happened at the Chicago International
Airport there at O'Hare back in 2006.
Now the UFO sighting over O'Hare International Airport in 2006 is
a documented event that occurred on November 7th of 2006 and of
course it remains a topic of interest.
Now. Several employees including
pilots and ground crew members reported witnessing A mysterious
saucer shaped object having above concourse sea of the
airport. The object was described as
metallic disc shaped and reflective with the distinct and
powerful white light emitting from its center.
The witnesses claimed that it remains stationary for several
minutes at an estimated altitude of 1500 feet and was clearly
visible in broad daylight. The most striking aspect of the
siding was a sudden and dramatic departure of the UFO.
According to accounts, the object shot up into the sky at
an incredible speed, piercing through the cloud cover.
The rapid acceleration left behind a distinctive hole in the
cloud layer, adding to the credibility of the witness's
claim. However, despite the numerous
eyewitness testimonies and the unusual nature of the sighting,
the event remains unexplained by conventional means, and skeptics
have suggested various theories just like they always do, such
as weather, phenomenon, reflections, or optical
illusions. But none of these explanations
have been widely accepted. Now the Chicago UFO exciting in
2006 continues to be a point of interest and debate among UFO
enthusiasts, skeptics and researchers.
And now these scientists who think this could be an example
of how these UFO's are traveling so fast and the way that they're
doing it now. This first article comes to us
from thedebrief.com and this is one that we've used a lot and it
gives us a little more background of the sighting
before we get into this theory. The articles written by
Christopher Plain and Micah Hanks and this is from May 2nd,
2023. It says the Chicago O'Hare UAP
Incident Physics Teams analysis offers a fresh look at this
famous 2006 case. The article begins by saying
shortly after 4:15 PM Central Standard Time on November 7th,
2006. It might have seemed like any
ordinary overcast winter afternoon for United Airline
employees outside of Gate C-17 at Chicago's O'Hare
International Airport. Ordinary, except for what looked
like a hole in the sky above one of the country's busiest hubs
for international travel, Visible in the 1900 foot cloud
base was an almost perfect hole, the apparent footprint left by a
round, unidentified object that had been seen hovering there
just moments earlier before it rapidly ascended, punching
through the clouds on its departure.
What unfolded over Chicago that afternoon would become one of
the most talked about UAP incidents of the new millennia.
Today, what is remembered as the 2006 O'Hare International
Airport UAP incident also remains a stark reminder of the
potential hazards that aviators face.
Amidst reports involving unrecognized objects that
seemingly invade America's most sensitive airspace with utter
disregard for Federal Aviation ordinances, the Federal Aviation
Administration FAA said nothing had been detected on radar that
afternoon. Still, several employees and
possibly even a few of the pilots and crew aboard outgoing
flights all observed something in the skies above O'Hare.
Now remember this is 2006 so the Internet wasn't nearly as
developed as it is today. News didn't travel quite as
fast. Most people still depended for
the depended on the television for the majority of their news
and it. So it was a lot easier for the
FAA to clamp down on the story at that time and really mitigate
the effect that all these multiple eyewitnesses would have
had by if they were able to get out there in public and really
spread this story. One of the earliest witnesses
was a United Airlines employee assisting the pushback of a
Boeing 737 five hundred from gate C-17.
So they're moving this plane right outside there in the
parking lot. As the witness would later tell
investigators, he was, quote compelled to look straight up
for some reason and was startled to see the craft hovering
silently upon seeing the object. The employee radio to notify the
United Airlines Zone 5 controller coordinator then
alerted the cockpit crew in the plane next to him about the
object. We reportedly open their windows
to observe the object. You got to wonder, he says,
Compelled to look straight up, he compelled to look at this
thing. We hear this so often.
People when they see these things.
I just felt like I should look there.
I just felt like I should go outside.
I just felt like I should look up.
I don't know if that's just our human senses, our Spidey senses
as some people call them, Just making us aware, making us
situationally aware of what's around us, that's a good thing.
Or if it's these things communicating with us, somehow
wanting us to make contact with them at that level, to look at
them, to see them, to observe them now what the motives are
there, who knows. Meanwhile, another employee that
would soon become a witness learned of the hovering object
after hearing his coworkers discussing it over company
radios. Quote I'm a management employee
for a major airline and was sitting in my office at around
1630 on November 7th was at 4:30 in the afternoon when a when an
employee made a radio call to our station operations center
concerning an object hovering over gate C-17.
Then has report the witness later anonymously filed with the
Seattle, WA based UFO Reporting Center new Fork.
Now if we go to that report they're talking about we'll just
read it here. It's from New Fork.
I'll put a link there at the Buy Me Coffee website.
You can go to the Buy Me Coffee website.
As always, thanks to the people that make contributions over to
the program. It's awesome.
Thanks to the people that support on Spotify, like
subscribe on whatever platform, on whatever platform you're at
now. It says the date on this is
November 7th, 2006. Says it's entered 1630 to 1640,
so it's 2:40 in the afternoon. It was reported it's like 5 days
later, 11-6 days later 11/13/2006 at 2:54 in the
afternoon and it was posted December 7th 2006.
So I don't know why but they waited 3 weeks to post this
thing. It describes the objects as a
disk. It says a duration 2 minutes and
then it has a new fork. Note It says this report is a
revised version of the original report submitted by this party
or these parties. It was revised at New Forks
request in order to disguise the person submitting the report.
Well, why wouldn't New Fork request that the report
accurately addresses the event, although we are satisfied that
the person or persons who submitted the report cannot be
identified from it? The above facts may be a
synthesis of what dozens of individuals saw, summarized by
one or more persons who are witnesses to the activities
surrounding the incident. I have problems with that
sentence right there. I have problems with the fact
that it was revised at New Forks request.
If this person wants to be public, then let them be public.
It's it's time to stop all this cloak and dagger nonsense.
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the source
for the information provided. Exclamation, exclamation.
The information that has been shared with our center has
proven to be flawlessly accurate as established by objective
cooperation. This witness is indicated above
that the event probably occurred at 1640 Central.
We believe that 1630 is a more accurate estimate and we have
amended the time above to reflect that estimate.
Official FAA tapes if they can be obtained, should provide the
exact time that the incident was reported to the O'Hare tower PD
and then it says Disk scene quote disk seen hovering over
O'Hare airport. Many witnesses FAA&TSA contacted
about incident. I am a management employee for a
major airline and was sitting in my office at around 1630 on
November 7th when employee made a radio call to our station
operations center concerning an object hovering over gate C-17
at O'Hare International Airport. I ran out of my office and saw a
relatively small object hovering in place over C-17.
The MET air that's METAR caps was reporting OVC 1900 and I
initially estimated the object hovering at about 1000 feet.
After about a minute I saw the aircraft zip to the east and
disappeared. I immediately called or
Operations Center to confirm the siding and the FAA was contacted
while I drove to the other concourse to talk with the
witnesses. I spoke with an employee working
that gate who said he was compelled to look straight up
for some reason and was and was startled to see the craft
hovering silently. He then made the radio call and
notified the pilots at the gate who opened the front windows and
witnessed the object themselves. So you got a guy on the ground.
You got a guy sitting there at the apparently they're on the
ground in the airplanes. You're 2 pilots, it says.
They opened their front windows and witnessed the object, so we
got 3 witnesses. The employee stated the object
was 500 to 1000 feet above the ground, rotating and metallic in
nature with no lights. He said it looked like a Frisbee
and was directly above. The FAA reported no radar blips
and I believe the TSA was notified.
Our shift manager was notified and the incident was immediately
reported to our WHQ operations center.
All employees are very familiar with aircraft around the world's
busiest airport. This is nothing we are familiar
with. As a side note, it is probably
unrelated. The next aircraft into that gate
was experiencing electrical problems.
Imagine that. So do you see?
What do you see The cover up here.
This is why you don't want to talk about it.
If you want to go to see your grandma, your kid or whoever,
and get on an airplane, you have to take your shoes off, walk
across a filthy mat, correct. Where all kinds of people walk
across. You have to put up with all the
nonsense of TSA, having your body bombarded with it with,
with all sorts of radioactive material from an X-ray machine.
Look it up. Stuff causes cancer.
It's not even not even an argument.
It's I think the last I read it was like one in 10,000.
You're getting cancer, these things, so you put up with all
this nonsense. I don't even fly anymore.
So you're right to a carefree, enjoyable trip on an airplane
has been taken away from you, and the TSA is in charge of
doing that because they're going to protect you.
But they can't even see a giant UFO sitting on top of the
International Airport. Same with the FAA.
They're supposed to be, they're supposed to be in charge of
taking reports of these things. Really.
That's your government. And so people say, well, why
would the government want to cover this up?
Well, the government would want to cover this up because it
shows, number one, they aren't doing their job and they
couldn't do their job even if they wanted to, if their job is
to protect us from these things. So people need to quit being
children about this. They need to be adults and they
need to understand that our rights are being violated.
We're having just a ton of inconvenience put upon us for no
good reason. And what this thing was seen, I
remember when this thing was spotted, and it seems to me as
if it was. The government was doing
everything they could to throw shade on this.
Why? Because it exposes their
ineptist, their incompetence, and their uselessness in so many
different cases. It goes on a little bit here and
says I ran out of my office and saw a relatively small object
hovering in place over C-17, the employees count read.
The Mitar was reporting OVC 1900 and I initially estimated the
object covering at about 1000 feet.
After about a minute, I saw the aircraft zipped east and
disappeared. At that time, the employer
contacted his operations center attempting to confirm the
presence of the object. Then, while driving to the
adjacent concourse to speak with the other witnesses to the
events, the individual also contacted the FAA.
Upon reaching the gate, the management employee spoke with
the first witness who initially reported the object over the
radio. The employer stated the object
was 500 to 1000 feet by the ground, rotating and in metallic
in nature with no lights, the New Fork report reported.
He said it looked like a Frisbee and was directly above all,
employees are familiar with aircraft around the world's
busiest airport. That report filed with New Fork,
added This was nothing we are familiar with.
Upon receipt of the report, New Fork director Peter Davenport
contacted John Hilkovich, a traffic reporter with the
Chicago Tribune. Although the FAA stated that
they had detected nothing on their radars, a FOIA request
filed by Hikovich would later reveal that there had been
communications with air traffic control about the object.
And this is where it sounds a little sketchy to me.
The Federal Aviation Administration said it's air
traffic control tower at O'Hare did receive a call from a United
supervisor asking if controllers had spotted a mysterious
elliptical shaped craft sitting motionless over Concourse C of
the United of the United Terminal, Hickovich wrote in a
column on January 1st, 2007. No controller saw the object, he
added, and a preliminary check of radar found nothing out of
the ordinary, FAA spokeswoman Elizabeth Esham Corey said.
OK, if that's all true, why did this?
Why did they happen to get a four year question as journalist
to report that? Why were they hiding that
information? That that just doesn't sound
believable to me. I'm sorry.
Zlikovich also interviewed several of the witnesses,
including those who reached out to Newfork following their
sighting. I tend to be scientific by
nature, recalled one witness, a United mechanic who had been in
the cockpit of a Boeing 777 taxi to a maintenance hangar at the
time of the incident. I don't understand why aliens
would hover over a busy airport, but I know what I saw, the
mechanic told Hookovich. And what a lot of other people
saw stood out very clearly. And it definitely was not an
Earth aircraft. He's got a point.
Why would a UFO hang out over an aircraft?
Oh, I don't know. Why would a dog pee on a fire
hydrant? Maybe they're just telling you,
hey, we're here and there's nothing you can do about it.
Whatever the object may have been that these witnesses saw
just before sundown on November 7th, 2006 remains unknown.
However, details about the seemingly unearthly encounter,
particularly the strange circular hole left in the clouds
as the object departed, have caused some experts to wonder
about the mechanics behind such an aircraft, if that's indeed
what it what it was and how they might operate, said.
According to a group of more than 30 physicists, witnessed
descriptions of the famous 2006 incident are suggestive in many
ways of an advanced form of propulsion that may one day
revolutionize space drive. This is what they call a case
for warp Dr. Kind of sounds like Star Trek Applied Physics first
came to note in 2021 with the publication of a novel Three,
produced by its team member, which outlined the hypothetical
function of a physical warp Dr. Similarities between the concept
outlined in the 2021 study, along with certain witness
testimonies from the 2006 Chicago O'Hare UAP incident
prompted them to perform an analysis that they say revealed
several aspects which seemed to match the characteristics
expected of a craft employing A warp Dr. Those similarities
include the way the craft reportedly moved along with
other features that included its shape, lack of radar signature,
and the way it seemed, and the way it seemingly punched the
hole through the cloud deck above as it left the scene.
Members of the applied physics team the debrief communicated
with are quick to note that the analysis is based purely on
witness testimony and should not be conveyed as proof that what
the witnesses observed was an extraterrestrial spacecraft or
other technology employing A functional warp.
Drive. However, the company's science
team and their analysis do offer potentially meaningful context
for the quality of the witness testimony regarding the 2006
Chicago O'Hare UAP incident. It also suggests that while
still speculative, a craft displaying Warp Dr. capabilities
could be an explanation that best fits.
The majority of witness reports goes on.
It says observation One the shape of the craft is described
by witnesses. Notably, several witnesses to
the 2006 UFO incident observed what was described as most
closely resembling a disc or saucer shaped craft hovering
over Gate C-17. Doctor Alexei Babri, chief
science officer at Applied Physics, told the debrief that a
saucer shaped craft with a cupola on top, which has been
prominently reported in many UFO observations throughout the
decades, would actually be an ideal shape for many known warp
Dr. designs. As proposed in the paper
introducing physical warp drives published by the Advanced
Propulsion Laboratory, Applied Physics provided the debrief
with a short scientific explanation for why a flatter
shape is beneficial for alcabier like metrics, which can be
viewed in the following slides, and they have a link to that.
It says some models of warp drives space-time suggests the
shape of the spacecraft and the resulting geometry of space-time
bending would significantly reduce energy requirements,
Robert told the debrief. Depending on the specific design
of the warp Dr. the passenger holding aircraft may benefit
from a saucer or spherical shape per the laws of general
relativity. Well, this might explain why the
government so hot on not letting have people have nice up close
pictures of these things. Maybe they figure if the wrong
people see what these things were designed like, that'll give
them an idea of how to build one.
I don't know. I mean that to me they come in
all sorts of shapes and sizes and I think that some of these
may be conforming to, you know, the laws of physics is at some
level as they're talking about here with this warp driving it.
But other these things just seem like they're absolutely
interdimensional and they're not in the laws of physics as we
know them are of little to no concern to them now.
So secondly, the movement of Chicago's O'Hare UAP and their
analysis. The Applied Physics team said
that there is no known aircraft that can hover in place and then
accelerate directly upward at the extreme rate many of the
witnesses identified. From the witness testimony, it
seems reasonable to claim that a metallic object around 50 feet
in diameter was hovering 1500 feet above passenger gate at an
International Airport within regulated airspace.
Yeah, where was the TSA at? Where was the FAA?
Take your shoes off, said Brandon Milcher, PHD1, of the
physicists behind the TEAMS analysis.
After some time, the objects accelerated from zero to about
1000 to 2000 feet per second almost instantaneously.
Although some modern drones are capable of sudden, fast vertical
acceleration from a hovering position, most unmanned aerial
vehicles currently in use do not bear the saucer shaped
appearance of the craft in question with a few notable
sessions, with a few notable exceptions, and none have been
shown to accelerate at the speed many of the witnesses to the
Chicago O'Hare UAP described. No, not even close.
According to data available in the past on the 2006 incident,
the airport's radar operations were unable to detect anything
on their scopes corresponding to the target described hovering
over terminal C-17. It is interesting to note that
the absence of any radar evidence of the object, in this
case multiple of debrief the Alcabiera Warp Dr. also causes
light rays approaching from behind to bounce off the bubble,
but away from their initial trajectory.
According to Melcher, if this object were an where an alpaca
bear warp Dr. the radar cross section would be incredibly
small. One fascinating effect of warp
bubbles is how they also explained the lack of radar
signal. Melcher says light rays
propagating from behind seemed to diverge away from the bubble
center, making masking is detection.
This would explain why there was no radar ping to the object
allegedly hovering over the passenger gate at Ord.
If the light gets deflected away from the object, there will be
no radar pings. That's fascinating that we can
see the same with the human eye. But radar it, it just bounces
right off of it and bounces away from it, so it's completely
invisible. Now it goes on #4.
The hole in the clouds, among the most novel aspects of the
event and one rarely reported in other UFO cases, involves A
testimony that after the craft accelerated vertically, it left
behind a distinct hole in the clouds.
This component, according to the physicist at Applied Physics, is
also consistent with a warp Dr. spacecraft.
In our study of proposed warp Dr. solutions, we have found
that the Alcabare Warp Dr. the first warp metric, appears to
induce behaviors that Max the observed phenomenon meltra until
the debrief. This Warp Dr. acts as a focusing
lens for material caught up in front of the craft.
As the bubble passes through a given medium, the particles in
front of it move along with the craft for some time, creating a
hole due to the time mismatch between the at rest particles
traversing the width of the bubble and the time it takes the
bubble to move through the cloud so they're bending space and
time. This would explain what's going
on with these US O's, these unidentified submersible objects
and how they can just fly into the water at these incredibly
high speeds. And there's no resistance from
the water, it's moving that water away from it as it goes
in, so it's creating almost like a tunnel now, it says.
Based on Melcher and the team's interpretation of warp Dr.
theory, an aircraft that raced through a cloud bank like the
one present at the time in two of the 2006 incident would
likely produce a hole newly identical to the one the
witnesses described seeing at the time.
The applied Physics team does know, however, that there are
well known natural conditions that can also produce circular
openings and clouds. There is a phenomena called fall
streak holes or hole punch clouds, Metro says.
Sometimes clouds in the sky become super cooled.
The temperature of the water vapor in the cloud is below
freezing at this point, but no seed forms to induce freezing.
When a plane or other object flies through such a cloud, it
is possible that the pressure differential behind the wings or
fins can create a drop of seed ice.
The resulting rapid freezing of the cloud appears as a hole with
a central bit of snowfall, and the frozen cloud falls as snow
for a little bit. Typical flight paths do not take
ascending or descending planes directly over airport terminals,
Melcher says, making such a method of departure for any kind
of aircraft over one of the world's busiest airports a
highly unusual and dangerous case.
If a plane did indeed create the fall streak hole, it would
represent one of the most severe violations of US airspace ever
recorded, as it put thousands of civilian lives at risk.
Well, yes. And where's your FAA?
No, of course this wasn't an airplane.
The the thing went straight up through the cloud.
Whatever this UFO was, it punched a hole in the clouds and
and the hole remained there. Now #5.
Reliability of Witness testimony, it says The witness
testimony that has been reported on and in the news bears a
number of interesting features, Melcher told the team.
Melcher and the team told the debrief The 1st is a variety of
professions and locations from which this object was allegedly
seen. Remember, this is this is what
you would call mass society. The main reports come from taxi
mechanics near the C-17 gate above which this object hovered.
There was at least one air traffic controller that heard
reports of the object and acquired, and there was at least
one observer who was driving into the airport and watched the
object with the bystanders. Melcher and the team also noted
that while all the reports bear resemblance to each other, they
do not seem contrived and do not necessarily borrow elements from
one to the other, but instead provide details that are
consistent throughout. It appears most public witnesses
did not know each other as well, Mitchell said.
We cannot be 100% sure of eyewitness testimony, but those
which have been preserved here do not contain major major red
flags as to reliability. Finally has a conclusion, it
says. Assessing the Chicago O'Hare UAP
incident UFO incident. The idea at Applied Physics
concedes that with the data currently available, they cannot
discount some earthly explanation, a few of which may
involve novel possibilities. One might include a US stealth
drone. Oh yes, the magic stealth drone,
which they know could explain the secrecy and cover up
surrounding the event. I'm going to stop right there.
Now I realize there's a lot of incompetence and stupidity in
our government. You could go, you could talk
about it for days. But would they be stupid enough
to fly one of these things over O'Hare airport where it could
cause a major airline disaster? As dumb as they are, there's
dumbest. Some of them are.
I'm sure there's a lot of smart people in there too.
But let's just say we get the dumbest people in the Department
of Defense and put them in charge of this.
They're very dumbest ones. Wanting to be 1 smart person
that would say, you know, I don't think flying this giant
drone over Chicago International Airport unannounced is a good
idea. And secondly, how do they get
that thing to travel at 2000 miles, 2000 feet per second?
It goes on, it says. The Applied Physics team also
offered their thoughts on the stigma surrounding incidents
like the Chicago Air UAPUAP case, especially for airline
pilots and airport personnel who report them.
Quote the NARCAP report on the incident, written within a few
months of his occurrence, made an interesting point about the
stigma associated with reporting UAP's and the air transport and
air defense industries in Ultra told the debrief.
If an object like this truly existed, it could pose a
significant security risk. By discrediting and belittling
those who report such events, we risk overlooking something that
could be real. Disparagement has never led to
progress or the discovery of truth.
Therefore, it is crucial to fund departments such as the All
Domain Anomaly Research Office, which collects vast amounts of
data on UA P's to synchronize efforts across the branches of
the Department of Defense. And it might add on to put up
really crummy websites that don't really tell you much, and
to write articles impinging the integrity of people without
naming it by name when they go to Congress.
Yeah, the only way to fully investigate somethings like this
is to gather more data, Melcher concludes.
The level of reluctance expressed by several witnesses
should be a cause for a concern, which is why we must remove the
dangerous stigma. Look, there's this.
Go along, get along bias. They make a lot of money as
pilots. They don't want to lose their
jobs. It's the same reason that people
take their shoes off and walk across filthy floors while being
forced to wear a paper mask that has a hole in it 10 microns
wide. With the virus, that's one
Micron, a white white. And call that science.
Okay. It's social pressure.
And this we have. We have as a community, a big
job ahead of us to overcome fifty 60-70 years of bullying,
of social engineering to make people afraid to talk about
these things. People just want to fit in.
They want to be normies. They take their shoes off and
walk across the filthy floor for the same reason they don't
report a UFO hovering over an International Airport.
They're afraid to rock. The boat goes on.
It says pursuing the truth should be the norm, not
suppressing facts and scientific discourse.
The applied physics team cautions that they do not intend
their observations to be interpreted to mean they have
concluded an alien spacecraft employing warp Dr. was observed
over Illinois in 2006. Sets conclusions cannot be drawn
solely from the witness reports and would require irrefutable
physical data. I mean, really, they can see it
right in front of their eyes. They can see all the reality of
it. They can do the math and the
engineering and they can figure it all out and they can say,
yeah, this is what I saw, and they could have a £10,000
elephant sitting in their living room tearing up the furniture.
And they wouldn't admit they had an elephant in the living room
until after it stepped on them. Until next time.
This is UFO warning over and out.