Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're talking about the Arctic UFO cover up.
That's correct. In Arctic UFO cover up.
Now of course we all remember the UFO shoot downs that
happened back in February of this year, 2023.
But now it's being said that there were possibly UFOs
witnessed, even reacted to, maybe even shot down.
We don't know in the Arctic previous to the one that we were
told about being shot down over at northern Alaska.
There. Now this article comes to us
from newsnationnow.com. They've broke a lot of these UFO
stories it says UAP spotted over Arctic Circle days before
Chinese spy balloon sources told News Nation.
NORAD scrambled jets to intercept the UAP.
And it says NORAD denies the incident, saying jets were on a
training operation. Then three other objects shot
down in February remain unidentified, so I guess at
least they're not denying that there were jets in the area.
Now this is from Ross Coulthard, updated November 2nd, 2023.
So a few weeks ago, 6:31 PM, it says three days before a Chinese
spy balloon appeared over the US, an unidentified object was
seen over the Arctic Circle with fighter jets being sent to take
the object down, sources told News Nation.
Exclusive reporting from Ross Coulter, investigative
journalist reporting for News Nation, recalls calls into
question whether the country has been given the full story when
it comes to a series of mysterious flying objects that
captivated the nation in February.
Well, we know we haven't been given the full story because we
haven't even seen the cockpit video of these things being shot
down. 4 incidents were reported publicly, including one
involving a giant Chinese spy balloon, but sources told News
Nation there was actually 1/5 incident before all of the
others. Americans were shocked when the
Pentagon light admitted a massive high altitude Chinese
surveillance balloon was able to enter US airspace unhindered.
The balloon drifted across North America for days before being
shot down by US fighters off the coast of South Carolina.
Six days later, it happened again.
On February 10th, 2023, around 1:45 PM Eastern Time, the first
of three objects were shot down by US fighters near the northern
Alaska town of Dead Horse. All three of the objects are
still officially acknowledged as unexplained, so see what they
say. It happened again, but it really
didn't happen again. You had the spy balloon, which
is 1 type of object, moving across the sky.
It's identified, but then you have three separate unidentified
objects that were shot down, and they're not explained.
One object's explained, 3 objects unexplained.
One object's not like the others.
Officials launched a massive air and ground search to find the
objects within hours of shooting them down.
The White House National Security Council spokesman John
Kirby, admitted they had no idea what the objects were.
You can see him at the press conference saying that they
didn't know what they were, so they were just calling them an
object. At that time.
They really didn't have their parallel narrative put together.
It seems we're calling this an object because that's the best
description we have right now. We do not know who owns it,
whether it's state owned or corporate owned or privately
owned, he said. We just don't know.
The incursions kept happening. The second cylindrical object
was shot down over Canada's Yukon the following day,
February 11th on the 12th, 3rd object was down Overlake Huron
near Michigan. That object was described as an
octagonal in nature. And of course you know they came
out lighter and tried to claim that it was a hobby called
balloon. Never have seen the cockpit
video on that either. 0 proof? Three sources told News Nation
there was an earlier, publicly undisclosed incident over the
Arctic Circle on February 1st, 2023, three days before the
Chinese balloon was shot down. OK, February 1st, 3 days before,
the defense and intelligence sources said eight or nine
unidentified aerial phenomena were detected over the Arctic
Circle, and fighter jets were set up in an unsuccessful
attempt to intercept them. Now remember, NORAD said.
Oh yeah, they were there, but they were on a training mission.
How Convenient. Fighter jets deployed from North
American Aerospace Defense Command NORAD to engage the
object, sources said. But the UAPS were seen
maneuvering away at high speeds. Former Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Defense Christopher Mellon independently confirmed
the story. Now this is where it gets a
little sketch for me. And when they bring Christopher
Mellon into this, I don't know. I've talked about him many times
in the program, you know, using the revolving door of the
Defense Department in and out of these different jobs that he's
had, the whole the whole story around him and Louis Elizondo
and the Tic Tac video and the Pentagon parking lot that he's
talked about himself. I'm just putting that out there.
And I take anything that Christopher Mellon says with a
grain of salt. I'm not sure if he is genuine or
if he's part of some kind of a parallel narrative that's being
foisted upon us by the Deep State.
I really don't know. It says I've heard the same
thing from an individual who would have plausible reason to
know, but this really speaks to a much larger issue, which is
the lack of information from the Air Force about UA PS generally,
Mellon said. So you know, here we go again.
You got this select group of people, many of which seem to be
you know, card carrying members of the UFO Mafia and they are
leaking to the press that there were other UFOs in that area of
the Arctic Circle that jets were scrambled to try to take down
before the Chinese weather balloon shoot down before the
UFOs that were shot down over Lake Huron, the Yukon and
Alaska. We just don't know.
We do know that there were planes in the area, nor had
NORAD has admitted this. So whether or not this
information is being had deliberately leaked out and and
dribbles and bits, or whether this is an honest leak where
people are really trying to tell us, you know, what's happening
here, I don't know. But we'll we'll hear them out.
It says News News Nation reached out to the Pentagon and NORAD.
NORAD denied allegations that fighter jets were scrambled to
intercept UA PS. But they did say they were that
they were there on a training mission.
So what are you supposed to know?
NORAD did say it had aircraft flying in the area.
There you go. But they were returning to home
bases as part of a training operation.
Sources also told News Nation that the object the US shot down
on February 10th was also anomalous.
There has also been silence in the eight months since it was
shot down, though in February the White House assured the
public it was confident the Alaska object debris would be
recovered. But we haven't seen it.
It fell not only within our territorial space, but what we
believe is frozen water, so a recovery effort will be made,
Kirby said. Well, certainly it seems like
there probably was a recovery effort made, but it also seems
like it's quite likely that we're not going to know about
it. So there you have this opening
salvo here. We're being told that there were
actually other UFOs that were pursued in the Arctic Circle
before this series of UFO shoot downs occurred.
Like I said, it looks like Christopher Mellon is being used
for one of the sources to this breaking news.
I have reservations about that, but I'm also open minded enough
to listen to it. Now let's take a look at this
next article. Now we're talking about what
could be a government cover up of more Arctic Circle UFOs and I
think it's helpful to just to look at the timeline a little
bit So we can find this from a New York Times article.
I'll put that at the Buy me a coffee website.
It says a timeline of the UFOs that were shot down after a
Chinese spy balloon was brought down this month.
US shot down at least three unidentified flying objects.
Of course this articles from February 21st, 2023 by Derek
Bryson Taylor it says got a pretty cool picture this balloon
being shot down wherever it was. The US military shot down 3
unidentified flying objects over a three day stretch earlier this
month after a Chinese spy balloon that had invaded
American airspace was down February 4th, setting off a
diplomatic crisis. It is unclear what the objects
wore, what their purpose was, or who sent them.
But President Biden said on February 16th that they likely
served commercial or recreational purposes in that
there was no evidence of a sudden increase in the number of
objects in the sky. Well, they're making an
assumption there, commercial or recreational, but yet nobody was
tracking these things. Nobody knew what they were.
Nobody knows who owns them. So you're getting a lot of
double talk right off the right, right right off the bat.
February 4th, it says a Chinese spy balloon is shot down over
the Atlantic Ocean. The balloon entered Alaskan
airspace on January 28th, Pentagon officials said, and
later drifted from Idaho SE to the Carolinas before before it
was shot down off the coast of South Carolina.
The balloon was about the size of three buses and was flying at
an altitude of 60,000 to 65,000 feet.
The incident prompted Secretary of State Anthony J Blinken to
cancel a trip to China that would have been the first by a
Biden cabinet secretary. China has maintained that the
device was a civilian aircraft that strayed into American
airspace. However, senior American
officials increasingly believe the balloon was originally
supposed to conduct surveillance over U.S. military bases in Guam
and Hawaii, but winds carried it off course.
Now, on February 10th, we're told a UFO is shot down off
Alaska. AUS fighter jet brought down an
unidentified object over the waters of Alaska.
We could call it a UFO because it was unidentified.
It was definitely flying and it was an object.
As Blinken says, the object broke into pieces was most
likely not a balloon, a Defense Department official said.
A White House official said the object was the size of a small
car. The object was detected on the
evening of February 9th and was headed toward the North Pole.
Now you know, there you go. They start off telling you a
little bit of the truth, and then they have to come out.
A few days later, and the parallel narrative begins,
February 11th, a UFO was shot down over Canada.
An American F22 fighter downed an object over the Yukon
Territory, which borders Alaska. The object, which a Canadian
official described as a cylindrical and smaller than the
spy balloon, was picked up on radar on February 10th as it
passed over Alaska. It was unclear what the object
was. Well, sounds unidentified, but
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada said it had violated
Canadian airspace. Yes.
And what were the Canadians able to do about it?
Absolutely nothing. February 12th it says a UFO was
shot down Overlake Huron. An object that first appeared
over Montana on February 11th was shot down the next day,
Overlake Huron off Michigan. Now, this is a little sketchy to
me too, because they say, oh, it's the same object from
Montana to Lake Huron. I mean, did they actually track
it the whole way? Was somebody there watching this
thing? I mean, how would you really
know? The object, which was flying at
about 20,000 feet, had an octagonal structure with strings
hanging off it, but had no discernible payload, U.S.
officials said. What we've seen is UFOs before
with strings and hanging off of it, and of course we know they
came up with the cockamamie story that this thing was put up
there by a bunch of hobby balloonist in Michigan.
If that's the case, I think they should be fine for releasing
balloons that they're unable to control that could possibly
collide with a jet airliners. Just my opinion, I find it to be
a completely unsafe thing to do. And then February 17th it says
the search for the objects remains is suspended. the United
States and Canada called off their efforts to recover the
remains of the objects that were shot down, in part because of
the difficulties posed by the train and the weather
conditions, official said. When asked if the United States
overreacted in shooting the objects or had any regrets, John
F Kirby, a spokesman for the National Security Council, said
absolutely not, he continued. Given the situation we were in,
the information available, the recommendation of military
commanders, it was exactly the right thing to do at exactly the
right time. So there you have it.
They're just going to tell you we shot three things down.
We don't know what they wore. We're not looking for them.
And good luck in your endeavor to find out what we know and you
don't know. It's kind of the attitude.
I mean, so you have 3 identified flying objects shot down, but
the search lasts like maybe 10 days tops. 12 days?
No more than two weeks. Wouldn't you think you'd want to
find those things if you didn't know what they were?
Wouldn't you think you'd want to find some sort of high tech spy
equipment, some sort of interdimensional material, off
planet resources? Wouldn't you want to find that
before somebody else does? And do you really think that
they quit looking for that stuff after two weeks?
I don't know, I have my doubts. Now let's take a look at this
next article. Now.
I also posted a link to this about a 4 minute video done by
Coulter here. Pretty pretty interesting stuff
and it was posted on reddit.com and I went ahead and used the
link. They put up UFO mystery over the
Arctic Circle Is a Pentagon hiding something at Vargas
report and this is under Kukukum it says Anyway they've got some
good comments. It says.
Well the first person says there was an interesting video from a
N slope oil worker who was being a YouTube He filmed a whole
bunch of military response to those down balloons quote, UN
quote flying over the coastal ice, C one 30s and Blackhawks
flying low information and the silence from the government.
That's very true. We talked about him and featured
him on one of the podcast. You could tell there was
definitely some kind of a large recovery effort going on after
that one in Porta Bay there was shot down.
This guy says I loose. Alternative 77 says I asked
myself why would they admit that some of the objects were UA PS?
Why not just keep it a secret? They obviously wanted us to know
but don't want us to know the details.
It's just strange. Well, I think it's just kind of
letting a little bit of the steam out of the kettle.
I mean, these things, it was just so much in your face.
They had to release something. This one says so many questions.
There were nine of them in just a few days in February.
How many since then? Did it just stop after that?
If they were balloons, why not just say that?
The Chinese didn't deny the balloon shot down in January.
It was theirs. So they've denied these others
were theirs. Whose were they?
And then it says why were FOIA requests for information
referred to a ARO? That suggests a ARO have the
data about these events. If they got to a point where
they actually shot these things down, then they know a lot about
them. So how can't they?
Why can't they clearly tell us they were all balloons?
Passing this off to Arrow suggests these were defined as
anomalous. Well, I think it's just more or
less just defined as a run around This here commenter says
they're gaslighting us all. We are either experiencing
observation by other rules, intelligence or the Chinese are
engaging in hostile behavior tortoise and it's our fault that
we don't know better. But the DoD desk, I don't think
it's the Chinese. I've gotten comments saying that
I'm a little too hard on the Chinese, that their military is
stronger than what I'm giving them credit for.
Listen, I have to tell you, the United States spends twice as
much on their military as the rest of the world combines.
The Chinese don't have a prayer to ask as far as military
prowess goes, even with the credit administration and some
of the crazy things that have gone on with the military.
These aren't the Chinese doing this, OK?
If the Chinese had this kind of technology at their disposal,
Taiwan, that wouldn't be a problem anymore.
I mean, just think about it. This stuff's coming from
somewhere else. It has to be.
Now I want to wrap this up with the sighting that did happen in
the Arctic, but quite a ways east of Alaska.
This article comes to us from themirror.co.uk.
It says man convinced he spotted a UFO hovering over Arctic Ocean
on Google Earth. And it's got a picture of this
UFO. It's incredible.
It almost looks like a humanoid shaped creature, tall pole like
structure with what looks like arms extending outside of the
thing. And it's it's really neat and
you can find the link there at the By Me coffee website.
Man convinced he spotted a UFO hovering over Arctic Ocean on
Google Earth Edward Edward Jones was thrilled to spot what he
thought looked like an otherworldly UFO off the coast
of the Norwegian archipelago of Salvabard.
But others weren't as convinced. Written by Ben Thompson, it says
Charlie Duffield, reporter This is March 2022.
So before all the stuff happened with these UFO shoot downs, a
man is convinced he has spotted a UFO flying over the Arctic
Ocean on Google Earth. Office manager Edward Jones was
confused when he spotted the mysterious figure hovering off
the coast of the of the Norwegian archipelago of
Svalbard. He claims to have spotted UF OS
in the past and shared his fighting on Facebook, but other
users weren't so convinced. Made all sorts of weird and
wonderful claims as to what the shadowy shape was, including
that it was Jesus, Michael Jackson, Star Wars, spaceship,
or even a passing seagull. Well, people are always going to
say stupid things. Edward believes it's none of
these options, claiming that it doesn't look from this Earth, he
said. When I'm bored, I'll go on
Google Earth and look around at different locations that you're
never going to see in real life. I was just being nosy and I was
having a look up around Greenland and the Arctic.
One of the shots was on a boat and I spotted it.
When I zoomed in, it didn't look like anything I'd ever seen and
I couldn't understand what it was in the middle of the sea.
I'm a big believer in UFOs. I've seen a few with my own
eyes. I couldn't say what it was the
way it was flying, it's sort of vertical, not horizontal, like a
plane, but Edwards post was greeted with a lot of
skepticism. He explained There's quite a few
non believers in the group. I put it up and people started
saying all sorts of things and then it goes on.
Just talks about the debunkers quite a bit.
I really don't care what they have to say, but it's
interesting. This guy did some homework.
This is called crowdsourcing and disclosure.
He's got this really good picture, I think of this UFO the
close up here shows of this cylindrical shaped thing.
It's perpendicular to the earth with these two appendages
sticking out of it and kind of a blue light in the middle.
Very neat. I mean you can just take a look
at it and see. Obviously this thing is flying.
It's an object and it's unidentified and.
So it just goes to show no matter, no matter how much good
work you do, no matter how much proof you show, you're always
going to have the crowd of debunkers and unbelievers that
are going to come out and mock and make fun of it really cool
that people are trying to do the work.
Actually, we can't reach those people.
So I don't care what they think the same way I don't care what
the government think. We know that three UFOs were
shot down over Alaska, the Yukon, and Lake Huron.
It's not even denied. So whether or not the the
government wants to come out it, admit that these things were
from some other dimension, some of the world, whatever, doesn't
matter to me. It's right in front of us.
Whether it's UFOs being shot down by the military, or whether
it's UFOs being photographed serendipitously by Google Maps,
these things are here and people are seeing them.
Until next time, this is UFO Warning.
Over and out.