Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're asking what's wrong with the Pentagon
UFO report. That's correct, What's wrong
with the Pentagon UFO report? And I can already hear it.
Some people are saying everything is wrong with the
Pentagon UFO report and we'll take a look at that.
This article comes to us from cbc.ca.
The title says all those UFO sightings.
They weren't aliens, just experimental aircraft, says the
Pentagon. Pentagon addresses long held
belief that U.S. government is covering up existence of aliens.
Written by Natalie Station. Now, are they really addressing
anything? I mean, when you address
something, don't you present the facts and then talk about the
interpretation of those facts by both parties?
Wouldn't that be a presentation? What this looks like is is a
narrative of some kind, and we'll see that, the article
begins. There's no verifiable evidence
that any UFO sighting in the US was actually extraterrestrial.
According to a new Pentagon report that addresses a long
held belief, the US government is covering up the existence of
aliens. Now, they start right off with a
blanket statement, no verifiable evidence.
So are you telling us that you've investigated every single
report that's that, that that's happened ever?
So that's it? That that has to be a lie on the
face of it, because they couldn't possibly have
investigated every single report, exhausted every single
reason for why this thing could have been there, and then
determined conclusively that it was not extraterrestrial.
And they don't even mention interdimensional.
It goes on. It says the report on the
historical record of the US government involvement with
Unidentified Anomalous phenomena.
UAP, what we call UFOs released Friday, also said that a spike
in suppose, look at the conditional language there.
UFO sightings since 1945 were actually US experimental
technologies of space rocket and air systems, including the
stealth technologies and the proliferation of drone
platforms. Now this is more stuff that
defies common sense and that's what's really missing from this
report. I'll just let the cat out of the
bag, common sense. Now we can If somebody makes a
statement such as always, you know that this happens every
single time, that there's never been something, something that's
never happened, Then all we have to do is find one exception to
prove that statement is false. And of course, we know lots of
UFO sightings that just defy what they've just said in these
first few paragraphs. I think about my own sighting.
Very strange going along a pretty lonely highway at that
time 3:00 in the morning, whatever it was and seeing this
craft. The best way I could describe it
would be like a bar stool shaped 4 legs.
The appearance, the texture looked like it was a concrete.
These legs kind of came together at the top where there was a
light on top that was splashing. I could see it from miles away
and it was such a strange experience.
What I what I realized later was that this thing was shape
shifting. When I first looked at it, it
was kind of setting off into the in the ditch along this highway.
And then as it rose up across the highway, it was actually
getting bigger. But I was just so enthralled
with this few seconds of interaction that I didn't
recognize by the time it had gotten across the highway and
flown over the highway at about, oh, I don't know, maybe 7-8 feet
off the ground, if even that right in front of my car and was
sitting in the medium. This is 4 lane Rd.
By that time, the same was probably 40 foot tall and a 2530
foot wide. So it had gone from an object
the size of maybe 10 or 12 foot tall by 10 or 12 foot wide and
it had grown up to maybe 2-3 times that size.
I didn't even recognize that was to happen, that that's what had
happened until I talked to the guy at MUFON and we're talking
about it. And he says, well, what you're
describing to me is two different shapes or two
different sizes rather of this UFO, what you first saw.
And then as you, you know, kind of left the area I was driving
in my car how much this is much larger than what you saw come
up, come up out of that ditch. And it took me a long time to
understand that sometimes these things do that I in my own mind,
these were always mechanical. They were something they must
have. I was just like the report.
I didn't believe in UFOs. When I saw this thing, I thought
it was mistaken identities. People maybe were being a little
delusional or most likely with some sort of secret program from
the government. That was my thought, just like
this thing says now that that theory holds water until you
come across One of these UFOs like I saw actually listened to
Coast to Coast that night and they were talking about UFOs and
I just thought it was a joke, so I tuned in.
But the the thing that blows this whole DoD thing out of the
water, which defies common sense as I said, is that when you see
one of these UFOs that say that's a shapeshifter or it
changes shape and size right in front of your eyes, that's
something that can't physically be done by any of our craft.
Just like these crafts that the pilots saw that were flying so
fast that any human on board would have been just turned to
Jelly from the G forces. We have to separate these craft
into two two different types really.
Kind of the the kind that possibly, theoretically could
maybe be some kind of of a top secret program, but likely not
because when you really get looking into them, they're just
too advanced for anything that we have.
Or the ones like what I saw and what like many people saw are
changing shape in front of our eyes.
Changing size in front of our eyes and appearing in the middle
of nowhere far far away from any defense program far far away
from any place where a test flight would happen.
They'd just show up in the middle of nowhere.
So they defy common sense does not hold up to common sense.
So when they when the Defense Department comes out and and
puts out this what 63 page report and says that none of the
sightings or show any evidence of being extraterrestrial, well
it's not my job to prove that they're extraterrestrial.
All I can say is I saw something that couldn't possibly have been
terrestrial. The thing was so advanced and so
strange and violated the laws of physics in such a way that it
could not have been produced by mankind.
Mankind can't produce an object that grows from say 12 foot to
40 feet in a matter of seconds and travels silently through the
air. Man can't do that.
So we know it's not terrestrial, and if it's not terrestrial,
then it's one of two things, extraterrestrial or
interdimensional, and they don't even talk about interdimensional
here. Now, it goes on and says U.S.
officials have endeavored to find answers to legions of
reported UFO sightings over the years, but so far have not
identified any actual evidence of extraterrestrial life.
Now, this is another lie they're telling.
They're claiming that they've tried to find the answers to
legions of reported sightings. It doesn't give you any numbers.
They're not quantifying things. Remember, any time that they're
talking to you on qualitative terms, how they feel, using
numbers like legions, saying things like that, they've never
come across anything like this. These generalized terms, these
terms that are emotionally charged, that's qualitative
thinking. You're estimating stuff, and it
leaves you wide open to lies. On the other hand, quantitative
thinking now they say. Here a 2021 government reported
that reviewed 144 sightings of aircraft or other devices
apparently flying at mysterious speeds or trajectories, found no
extraterrestrial link, but drew a few other conclusions and call
for bit for better data collection.
Now, a paragraph like that, they start out with a qualitative
premise. 144 sightings. OK, we can talk about these.
But then they veer off into this nosedive of qualitative
hyperbole. They say flying at mysterious
speeds. That's apparently they're using
qualitative thinking. Again, Look, if we've seen these
things fly, it's not apparent They're flying at high speeds.
They are flying at high speeds. Trajectories found no
extraterrestrial links. What were they looking for?
Any extraterrestrial links? Did they find any terrestrial
links? So they can say, well, we don't
nothing to see here, we don't see how these things are from
another planet or another dimension.
Notice they didn't mention dimension, but they also didn't
find any terrestrial links. Qualitative because The thing is
these UFO sightings that we're reporting, just like myself and
so many other people, we're just saying this is what we saw.
Now you can either believe that and say, well, the person saw
something, are you going to say, well, this person's crazy,
they're delusional, whatever to me.
It doesn't matter for me personally.
But what's not happening is they're not going through and
they're not using critical thinking skills.
They're not using common sense to go through and look at these
sightings and talk about them and put them into a column,
known or unknown. That's the first thing we have
to do. We have to say, well, we know
what they are or we don't know what they are.
And if we don't know what they are, they could be
extraterrestrial, they could be terrestrial, or they could be
interdimensional. That's that's your three basic
choices right there. But they're not doing any of
that. They're not categorizing any of
the data. That would be a a quantitative
way to approach this thing. You put a number on it, he asks
questions, and then you can get closer to the truth.
You don't just stand outside, look up the clouds, see a UFO
and say, well, that didn't that, that that's not a UFO, That's
not extraterrestrial. I don't know what it is.
It must be space trash. The Pentagon has denied his
claims and said in late 2022 the issue received fresh attention
last summer when retired Air Force intelligence officer David
Gresh testified to Congress that the US was concealing a long
standing program that retrieves and reverse engineers
unidentified flying objects. Now that may or may not be true,
but there is evidence that that's happening and there is
evidence that that's happening because of all these FOIA
requests have been made and have come back blanked out.
So we know that there's a lot of stuff that they're not telling
us, and that would include, just just on the face of it, the
possibility that something like this could be going on and they
could just be choosing not to tell us.
The Pentagon has denied his claims and said in late 2022
that a new Pentagon office set up to track reports of
unidentified flying objects, the same one that released Friday's
report, had received several hundreds of new reports, but it
found no evidence so far of alien life.
Once again, qualitative. All they're saying is several
hundreds. Now, wouldn't you think that
these guys had a grasp on the facts?
They would know exactly how many new reports that they've got.
They've got all those reports in the last year or two, but no
evidence so far of alien life. They're couching the terms there
rather than to try to prove that these things are
extraterrestrial or interdimensional.
It seems like it would make a lot more sense to 1st figure out
if these things weren't terrestrial and they're not
doing that. They're not subjecting them to
any kind of a test that says, well, if it's from this Earth,
then it should only be able to fly this fast, or it should only
be this size, or it should only exhibit these characteristics.
They're not subjecting these UFO reports to any kind of
quantitative test. As far as I'm concerned,
everything they do is qualitative.
That way they can inject their own emotions.
That way they can cut out the facts and keep us in the dark.
The Pentagon's report said that there is a persistent narrative
and popular culture that the US government or secretive
organization within it, recovered off world spacecraft
and biological extraterrestrial remains, that it operates a
program to reverse engineer the recovered technology, and that
has conspired since the 1940s to keep this effort hidden from the
United States Congress and the American people.
Reports of flying saucers became a cultural phenomenon in the US
and the 1940s and 50s Notes to the Library of Congress and
fears were amplified by the Cold War.
OK, so they're they got their feelings hurt.
People think that they're hiding UFOs and they won't tell us or
Congress about it. Well, explain to me what
happened a few weeks ago when Congressman Luna, Congressman
Matt Getz, and Congressman Tim Burchett went down to Eglin Air
Force Base in Florida and demanded to talk to what 3 or 4
pilots had seen the UFO and taken a picture of it.
After some argument, some threats by Congress to these
yahoos, they were allowed to speak with one pilot.
They got a little drawing and they never saw the picture.
So who's hiding what from who? Fear of the possibilities for
destruction in the Cold War era proved fertile ground for
terrestrial anxieties to manifest visions of flying
saucers and visitors from the other worlds who might be hidden
among us in plain sight fears of destruction from the cold world.
Do we need to talk about what happened with the atomic nuclear
weapons back then? Do you have any idea of how many
of these things they let off in the deserts out there in Nevada
that they let off one of the biggest above ground nuclear
explosions ever out there in Nevada?
And they said oil will be OK because the toxic waste from
this will dump out in the Atlantic Ocean.
Just kill a few fish, right? Give them cancer.
What happened? Had a big had a big rainstorm in
the Midwest on the way out, and you got counties down there in
Missouri and Iowa and Illinois have some of the highest cancer
rates in the country. Why?
Because all the nuclear fallout from the bombs that they let off
in Nevada just to see what they would do.
We're not dealing with trustworthy people here.
So when they release these reports and they start shedding
crocodile tears about how nobody likes them and how nobody trusts
them and how they're here to save America, don't forget these
were the same people that released tons and tons and tons
of nuclear weapons in the in the in the 40s, fifties and 60s that
killed through cancer and radio and radiation poisoning.
Who knows how many thousands, if not millions of people.
They didn't care about us then. They don't care about us now,
goes on. It says movies like Star Wars
and close Encounters of the Third Kind of The 1970s and ET
and Alien Flight of the Navigator and Predator in 1980s
took the interest in extraterrestrial life to a fever
pitch. In the 1990s.
Television shows like X-Files feature pilots where FBI agents
investigated claims of UFO sightings and alien abductions,
as well as government conspiracies to cover them up.
The authors of Friday's report said the purpose was to apply a
rigorous scientific analysis to the subject that has long
captured the Americans public imagination.
Now that's a joke. First off, they throw in some
hullabaloo there about movies being made about UFOs.
Look, people have been seeing UFOs since there's been men
pictures of aliens and spaceships and whatnot on cave
wall paintings. We talked about them in the
Middle Ages. Talk about them in and during
the antiquity, among among the Romans and the Greeks, the
pilgrims saw them. We've been seeing them since
there's been people. We don't need Hollywood to
convince us that there's such a thing as UFOs.
And then this sentence right here.
The authors of Friday's report said the purpose was to apply a
rigorous scientific analysis to a subject that has long captured
the American public's imagination.
Now that that line there's scary in a couple of ways.
It shows some really almost evil intent to me.
First off, it says that the purpose was to apply rigorous
scientific analysis. That's a bald faced lie.
They haven't applied anything close to a rigorous scientific
analysis. You can't even see here to
hardly find a number of reports they got.
They just tell you it was a bunch.
They're not putting any kind of a number metric on this thing at
all. They're not talking about this
thing went this fast, this thing was this size.
They have not created any kind of a metric by which they can
judge these things as to either be terrestrial or not
terrestrial. They're just saying there's no
evidence that these things are extraterrestrial.
That's not how research works. The first thing that you have to
do is you have to identify and label the stuff that you are
researching. You have to sort from the knowns
to the unknowns other unknown object.
Well, how do we make these things a known object?
Well, we can rule some things out.
How about that? Well, how do we rule things out?
Let's talk about how an object that is earthbound, an object
that's created by people, an object that maybe is a weather
phenomenon, all these different types of objects that we're
familiar with. Let's talk about how they work
and what defines them. And then take a look at these
UFOs that we're seeing. Take a look at the video, take a
look at the eyewitness testimony, and let's build a
profile on them. And let's see if that profile
matches something that could be earthbound or not.
And then we can say, well, it could be heat, lightning, well,
it could be a drone. But then there's that group that
doesn't fit, that they're still in the group of unknowns.
So we've narrowed them down a little bit.
And let's take a look at those and see what makes them
different from anything that we find on Earth.
And then decide, well, could they be extraterrestrial?
Could they be interdimensional? We don't know.
That's about the best we can do right now.
So this idea that they're going to apply rigorous scientific
analysis to tell us that what we saw is not extraterrestrial and
leave it at that, doesn't cut it, That's not rigorous
scientific analysis. We've seen nothing that
resembles rigorous scientific analysis.
The stuff they're giving us, Most of it is classified.
I mean the meat of it is that will give you a few lines here
and there, but they won't give you the details.
Just like the UFOs that were shot down over Alaska, Yukon and
Lake Huron. How can we analyze that?
How can we apply rigorous scientific analysis to that
situation with those three shoot downs?
All we know is the public is that three different items were
shot down. They were described in very
different terms by different pilots.
Most of them said that they were some type of floating object.
They didn't see any means of propulsion or suspension.
Sounds like almost like a floating refrigerator or a
floating car or something. But we're not allowed to see the
video. They're keeping that from us.
Good, rigorous scientific analysis is able to stand up to
public scrutiny. Never forget that someone tells
someone tells you that they want to put something in your body,
but you can't know what it is for another 75 years.
That's not rigorous scientific analysis because it doesn't
stand up to public scrutiny. OK, it doesn't conform to common
sense. In order for something to stand
up to rigorous scientific analysis, it first has to stand
up to common sense. Use your common sense.
It says that Arrow recognizes that many people sincerely hold
versions of these beliefs, which are based on their perception of
past experiences, the experiences of others whom they
trust, or media and online outlets they believe to be
sources of credible and verifiable information, the
report said. Now, that paragraph right there,
that's classic mind control. They're trying to empathize with
you. It's what's called the Rogerian
method, was a Carl Rogers Rogers, a psychologist.
The way he would talk to people would be like they'd come in.
They'd have a problem and, oh, I see you're feeling this way.
Oh, that's how you feel. And just basically agree with
the person all the way along down the line.
What good did it do? I don't know.
Especially if they were seriously mentally ill person
that need to be medicated, agreeing with them and
empathizing with their delusions and their anger and their
anxiety, that's not going to help any more than if somebody
came into the emergency room with a broken arm and they had a
bone sticking out and you as a doctor would say, oh, yeah, I
see you have a bone sticking out.
Yeah. Yeah.
That must be really painful. Wow.
Yeah. Well, I hope.
I hope that I hope you feel better.
No, This is this nonsense where they want to pacify and just
kind of come alongside you and and make you think that they
understand what's going on, but they're just manipulating you.
Arrow recognizes that many people are just in the
qualitative term. They're not saying, well, 70% of
the population, many people, OK, they're trying to.
They're trying to weasel their way into your head.
Through these emotionally charged statements, Arrow
recognizes that many people sincerely hold versions of these
beliefs which are listen to it based on their perception of
past experiences, the experience of others whom they trust, or
media and online outlets they believe to be sources of
credible and verifiable information.
So their perception. No, you just thought you saw
that I was just driving down the road that night and thought I
saw a UFO. Didn't believe in him at the
time at all, thought it was a joke, thought that people that
saw these things were delusional until I saw one.
But that must have just been my perception and it says the
experiences of others whom they trust.
Well, I knew people that told me they saw UFOs and I just laughed
at him. I didn't love him any less, but
I thought, wow, he must have had a bad night so that their
experiences had no impact on what I saw.
And then it says or media and online outlets they believed to
be sources of credible and verifiable information.
In other words, anybody who has a podcast or a web page or
anything is is a media personality that tells you they
think the government might be lying to you, that maybe we
should be able to see the video of the three UFOs that were shot
down last year. Maybe that would be a good idea.
Maybe when Greenwald sends in a FOIA request from The Black
Fault, they should send him back the whole page and not blank out
all the good parts. Maybe the proliferation of
television programs, books, movies, and vast amounts of
Internet and social media content centered on UAP related
topics most likely has influenced the public
conversation on this topic and reinforced these beliefs within
some sections of the population. It said narrative control.
That's another really scary paragraph right there.
They're upset. They're able to turn on Spotify
and listen to this program and ask questions, Simply ask
questions. A very human thing to do.
They're upset about that. You being able to ask questions,
you being able to see pictures that other people have taken of
these UFOs. You being able to listen to the
stories that other people have seen, these things, being able
to listen to those people, hear them out, and then decide for
yourself whether they're not they're credible.
Decide for yourself after you've applied reasoning and logic and
common sense. Does this thing sound like
something that could fly? Well, that's dangerous.
That's really dangerous because you might come up with an idea
that didn't go along with what the DoD was telling you.
The Department of Defense, the people who cannot account from
$1.55 trillion. Now that's according to Bernie
Sanders and Chuck Grassley, one of the most liberal guys in
Congress. Senators, one of the most
conservative they can disagree about pretty much everything.
Bernie Sanders and Chuck Grassley can disagree about
pretty much everything. They come from 2 poor opposites
of the political spectrum, but they both agree that the
Department of Defense cannot account for half of its stuff,
$9000 per taxpayer they've lost. Yet these very people who've
been so financially, I don't know.
At the very least, they've been incompetent and at the worst,
they've been traitorous to take the treasure of this country and
to fretter it away with absolutely no accountability.
Now those people have created a 63 page report telling you that
the reason that you saw a UFO was because maybe your friends
or family saw one and you didn't want to be left out.
Or maybe you were listening to the wrong people on the radio or
the podcast that told you things different than what they're
telling you. That maybe the pressure from
your little group of friends was just too much and you woke up
one morning and decided to start asking questions at the
Pentagon. So the people that can't keep
track of half their stuff, $1.55 trillion, are telling you that
they have kept track of every single UFO sighting and
encounter that's ever happened. And they've decided that not one
of those is extraterrestrial. That's rich.
Until next time. This is UFO warning over an
hour.