Hello and welcome to the program UFO.
Warning today's topic the Pentagon and UFO Secrets.
Now I found this article on the war zone, it's a section that
you can find on the dr.com and the dr.com is a fantastic
website for UFO research, they do a lot of great work over
there. I highly recommend checking it
out. And the title says, here is what
the Pentagon is not answering about the Air Force and recent
UFO encounters. The article is by Tyler Rogue
away dated March 23rd 2020. It says the Air Force attempted
to answer our questions but the dod official in charge of the
UFO. Inquiries didn't share their
findings for anything at all. This is something we see
happening more and more in life. People find how little control
that we have over our own lives, when we bump up against these
bureaucrats and these bureaucracies there will be new
rules is if they are the law of the land and for all intent and
purpose they have the enforcement and the law of the
law of the land and there's nothing that we as Citizens can
do about them. We can see this with this covid
Panic. How Governors and Mayors have
just gone in and randomly shut down businesses.
Because they That they're afraid of the covid, virus.
There is a disturbing Trend in this country of bureaucrats
acting in the capacity of dictators, controlling people's
life refusing to share with us information that we have every
right to see. Now, in this case here, it says,
one of the biggest questions regarding the US, Navy's recent
disclosures regarding strange encounters with supposedly
unidentified flying craft as, why are we Only hearing about
this highly concerning phenomena from just one service.
In fact that's commonly understood, is that it is not
the Navy's job to maintain sovereignty over America's
airspace. It is the Air Force's, if
strange, and unattended, fight craft, or being detected or seen
the Air Force has the mission to respond and investigate not the
Navy and it can do. So at a moment's notice, so far,
the Air Force has been totally mum on this issue which Which is
extremely bizarre considering the Navy's own messaging
surrounding it. If we just stop and consider for
a minute, we have to wonder what's going on here that the
Navy, and the Air Force are acting so differently when it
comes to UFO disclosure. This is a case of good cop/bad,
cop or is this a case where you have two of these?
Two of these huge bureaucracies military organizations that are
just being run. By individuals and not under say
a blanket. A blanket theory of how we
should operate. It seems as though we have two
different military organizations entirely operating here, one
wants to talk about the UFOs and the other dozen and we have to
ask ourselves is that something that we're prepared to accept in
America, aren't we supposed to all be on the same page here?
Because Lana says with this, in mind last September, I reached
out to the Air Force, that's the author speaking with a series of
very pointed questions. Regarding what seems like a
massive discrepancy in regards to the military branches?
Leti to execute its Homeland air defense.
Mission, what seemed like a good start to finding answers into
something of a nightmare that has made me lose all confidence
in the defense Department's ability to address a subject
which they themselves have actively helped Elevate within
the Public's Consciousness in any meaningful manner.
My initial inquiry to the Air Force, resulted in a very
positive experience, the folks at the Air Force Headquarters,
press desk, we're not phased At All by the topic and seemed
eager to look into it on our behalf.
After discussing the issues with them directly on the phone.
The question I sent to them were specifically written to move the
ball forward on this critical aspect of the issue and in doing
so, getting the Air Force on record about the issues overall
in some manner. Now, if I could just interject
here, I think a lot of times when people address those first
questions to a bureaucracy or a branch of the military, what
they're coming, and what they're coming in contact with is these
low-level to mid-level folks who have been put in there to deal
with these kind of questions. And a lot of these people
probably are genuinely nice. But we have to keep in mind that
these bureaucracies are compartmentalized The power and
the information that constitute that power is concentrated in
certain Pockets, sometimes at the top of the hierarchy,
sometimes in a back room somewhere but it's concentrated.
Among these people that come into these positions and that
are buried in this broker Seas for decades upon decades.
So it doesn't surprise me that the author here starts off on
the right foot and feels like they're going to get some
answers, but soon comes up a brick wall because he's walked.
Into safe. But what he's not thinking about
is that the most of the money in the bank is kept into the safe.
He's walked into the bank, but he's forgetting that the money
is in the safe. He's talking to the teller, he
can get a little money from them, but they're real money, is
kept in the safe and then the real big money does not even in
the safe. It's on a computer somewhere and
it forms of zeros and ones. So it's almost impossible for us
to access the real valuable information.
The article goes on says, ideally, this could have
included some background as to the nature of these events from
the services point of view, and especially in regards to its
Homeland are sovereignty Mission, as well as information
about whether its own air Crews were experiencing similar
encounters. Here are the questions.
I filled it to them on September 19th, 2019.
This is first off here, is what we are looking for on the
ongoing UFO. You AP story with the Navy and
the US Air Force's position to comment on this issue and then
he says have Air Force pilots encountered any similar
unexplained phenomena on radar Electro.
Optically or visually if so what is a general frequency magnitude
of these events? Question number two, Navy Super
Hornet Pilots out of NASA. Oceania had constant encounters
with these objects in 2014 and 15, especially on a radar.
It got so bad. That by early 2015 Oceania filed
notams warning aviators about the phenomena in the warning
areas off Virginia, we have talked to the crews directly
about this and are in the process of obtaining these
notams And the paper trail leading to their posting
Langley's f-22s, which have Superior sensory, capabilities,
in some respects to the super Hornets as well as a bit, as
well as the basis. T-38 aggressors are based right
next door and use the exact same warning areas for training.
Daily, did Langley aircrews experience the same phenomena,
if so, to what extent, what about other US, Air Force
assets, that use the same are sport air.
Force air space for training. Next question, the Navy.
The Navy changed its reporting practices and procedures for
encounters with unexplained flying objects significantly due
to the massive increase in incidents in recent years.
As the Air Force done the same, if not, why?
Because does even does it even have set procedures for these
events? If so, what are they?
Has the u.s. Air Force, experienced the same
massive increase in incursions of you.
Ap's over spaces, installations that the US Navy has does the
Air Force have similar. Electro-optical infrared video
of you APS similar to what the Navy has four other data for
that matter. Does the Air Force see this
phenomenon as a national security threat?
What is it doing to mitigate or better?
Understand it. Thanks so much for your help on
this. I think it's critical to clear
these details up up, especially now that the Navy has admitted
the videos depict depicting. These unexplained craft, or
indeed, real, and show objects, it can identify He goes on and
says, I quickly followed up with another question.
The Navy is saying these things are constantly as in many times
a month, or more busting into controlled, or even secured
airspace and 2015, there were there for, they were there, four
days off. Virginia in the morning areas,
even causing the base to post a note a due to near-misses, Etc.
The US Air Force is tasked with protecting this.
Space has the US Air Force launched alerts and investigated
these. When the Navy or maybe even the
US Air Force was calling them out.
What was done in regards to Homeland defense when these were
in the warning areas? So persistently, how did the US
Air Force and its NORAD arm. Take this issue up during the
2014-15 incidents. And what does the Navy and what
does the Navy say has occurred constantly all Over through this
very day. Wow.
Now, that's a lot of questions and I'm just going to guess here
that the typical Navy intelligence officer, whoever
setting down to read those questions, probably just wanted
those things happen to them in a pile.
I could make a suggestion if I was going to be sending inquires
to the Navy on something like UFOs.
I think I'd send maybe four or five very specific, very short
questions and just leave it at that.
Because these guys don't want to walk into a trap and if you're
going to get disclosure, I like the way that green wall doesn't
on The Black Vault, he'll send a request for some specific
document so that way he's got him.
He's got him on the exact document that is asking for, and
then if they send the document back to him, it's all blacked
out and redacted that maybe he'll send back.
I know the request for, you know, Lush redaction or
something. He's he starts out with
something simple and then Narrows his way down in a A lot
of times, he comes across some of the most just mind-blowing
evidence. Because what happens is he
starts to you starts to kind of rope these guys into a corner, a
little bit. But the problem I see, with this
line of questioning, this fellow has taken, is that he's asking
so many questions, and he's putting so much information out
there, that I think it could actually overwhelm the person
that's reading. And I think the best thing to
have done here would to have been Very specific, very short
questions and then follow up from there.
Now, it goes on. He says, Once again, I have to
stress that the Air Force has the Homeland are sovereignty
Mission fighter, aircraft set on alert across the United States,
ready to scramble within a matter of minutes to intercept
and investigate any unknown craft flying in or near the
nation's airspace now that's correct.
We hear all the time about Russian aircraft threatening our
airspace and how the American Ian u.s.
Fighters were scrambled to meet the craft in the sky.
Possibly, he could have just simply ask them, have US
aircraft been scrambled in the past, say three years to your
knowledge to address a UFO that might have been a question to
ask. It says this includes what some
may traditionally. Call UFOs fighter fighter,
aircraft set on alert across United States re just came
within a matter of minutes to Investigate any unknown aircraft
flying in, or near the nation's airspace?
This includes what some may traditionally call UFOs.
The war zone has incredibly in-depth evidence of how how
such an action is taken with regards to the presence of
transient unidentified flying objects, little own ones that
are persistently operating in restricted airspace as was
supposedly the case off the coast of the United.
It's in 2014 and 15 will right there.
If they have this evidence the best time that they could have
done was just have to have crafted a question.
A short simple question in regard to that evidence and put
that to the air to the Air Force especially if they would have a
name date place. I mean these things have to be
specific Air, Force units, that fulfill the Homeland air defense
Mission are spread across the country.
But these But those equipped with the highest level of
fighter, aircraft capability are scattered around the
continental, United States, Maritime perimeter, and are also
based in Alaska. And a, why he equipped with the
most powerful fighter optimize active electronically scanned
array Radars in the world and caring sniper targeting pods for
long-range visual Target. Identification.
Primarily fulfill the maritime border defense role in the
lower. E8 states with the f-22s in
Hawaii and Alaska. Doing the same F-16 CDs which
are also now equipped with a Esa.
Radars based at Andrews, Air Force Base just outside of
Washington. D.c. keep watch over the capital
region. Other f-16s from a handful of
Air Force units, have Patrol. The central u.s. can also help
augment, the country's perimeter Ariel security.
But the alert mission is one that must be specifically
trained for with unique protocols and infrastructure.
It's, it is resource of tension. It is resource intensive and not
cheap to execute either. In other words, it is not
something that just any Fighter Squadron, especially a Navy.
One that has a very different Mission.
Focus can just execute on the Fly under normal control
circumstances. As such my question attempted to
fill in the missing part of the Navy's recent ufo-related
accounts, if these flying aircraft were indeed, Being
detected. How is it possible that the Air
Force didn't scramble to investigate them, and do so
multiple times over the course of these events?
If incursions over installations are ongoing regardless of, if
they are drones, or something far more, Fantastical, how isn't
The Air Force directly involved with investigating and
mitigating? These potential threats inside
the air source, inside the airspace, they are responsible
for Well, if I could interject, I would not expect an answer on
that now, you can see what happened last winter.
When we had the Drone, swarms flying all over Colorado,
Nebraska Many Western States and all the government agencies were
mum on it. Everybody claimed that they
didn't know anything about it, which turned out to be a lie.
Because what we found out later was finally admitted was that
the Air Force missile bases out in Colorado, and Nebraska.
And that frequently war game, what would happen if they were
invaded by drones? What's perfectly fine?
I mean I think we're all. Okay.
Okay, with the Air, Force wargaming stuff to keep the
missile silos safe. But instead of them just coming
out and saying that, right, beginning, they let everybody
they just allowed this anxiety to spread.
They wouldn't directly address what was going on with these.
Large swarms of drones that certainly weren't put up by
recreational drone users, and it took weeks of people inquiring
about this, and really getting quite agitated before we finally
got some truth about the matter. And it was addressed.
So, I am not hopeful for disclosure from the US Air
Force, and it almost seems like the disclosure, from the Nate,
from the Navy was either accidental or some kind of
controlled narrative. Let's not forget that.
As part of that disclosure from the Navy, there was a lot of
positive press and I have to speculate profits gained on the
part of organization, like Tom delong's Academy to the Stars.
Remember they were the ones that seem to got a hold of that that
cockpit video first for some reason.
So it almost seems as though there were I mean you couldn't
blame somebody for thinking that the Navy or that certain people
within the Navy had ulterior motives for disclosing.
That UFO information. Now, apparently in the air force
that ulterior motive doesn't exist because they're showing no
desire or need to disclose this UFO phenomenon.
Now the article goes on here a little bit and I'll just get
down here closer to the bottom. It says, after promising to
start with the Air Force itself, I was told that the inquiries
had been forwarded to the office of Secretary of Defense, OSD
public affairs, arm One public affairs officer Susan, golf
would be handling the request. At first, the sounded very
promising, the inquiry had been elevated to someone in a
position that might be able to really add some unique context
of the issue. Sadly this ended up being
anything but the case simply put my experience with Susan and I'm
not sure if is a ghoul or golf has been the worst.
I have had with any of the defense Department's Public
affairs Personnel ever. What has transpired or more
accurately what hasn't transpired over the last six
months leaves me with no confidence or trust.
In this official representing the dod on the issue.
This is not personal in any way. She may be a wonderful person
but her behavior has been a clear example of everything, the
pentagon's media operations. Should not be and it certainly
is not due to a lack of training or experience her resume is
impressive and may even be concerning to some who are
seeking some morsel of Truth regarding this bizarre and
historically tortured issue, my experience is not.
Anyway, my experience is not unique in any way, others who
are working. This story of had similar
experiences almost to a laughable degree.
The reason why so many journalists are interacting with
her. Her at all on this issue.
Is that she now holds the entire media public affairs portfolio
on UFOs within the dot. I'll think about that one
person. With control over all of the UFO
information. In the Department of Defense.
Now, see you can elect somebody who think as a populist like
Trump and I'm sure is a great guy, but it doesn't do any good
when he constantly a points, deep State actors to these key
positions and you have to wonder if he's just doing it because
he's too busy to pay attention or if he's being forced to But
this is a classic case of a gatekeeper.
You have these journalists who somehow have it in their head
that if they just asked the question, the right way, they'll
get the answer but over and over again.
We see the we see these journalists these professionals
bumping up against these Gatekeepers because on it says
sometime shortly before. I just before I submitted my
questions, the decision was made to funnel every request
regarding this. Issue to her and her alone, the
services no longer had control of their own messaging on the
matter why this decision was made has not been made clear, I
wrote and called Susan go four months after my initial
inquiries were forwarded to her no correspondence was answered
and no comments were given not a timetable for delivery or a
simple. We cannot comment at this time
response to any of my inquiries. Nothing in the meantime,
prolific Freedom of Information Act, Filer and author, John
Greenwald over at Black Vault.com.
That's the guy had received a foia request.
That not only had my question in it, but it had also had the
internal correspondence with in the Air Force concerning.
Answering at least a portion of my inquires, John was nice
enough to let me know. He had received the documents
and that he would work with me as to their release.
Now see, that's exactly what I was talking about.
John Graden wall is an expert at asking questions and the
simplest most perfect way and I think when you ask questions,
that might be interpreted to be a little bit convoluted or too
long, they just get tossed in the wastebasket.
Because these people don't feel it could be they're just lazy.
They don't want to have to go to the extra work of answering a
compound question. But if you give them a simple
question, that perhaps references, a specific date or a
specific piece of paper that was filled out, which Greenwald is
really good at doing then. I think they almost feel
obligated to answer those questions.
You're speaking their language But you have to understand, I
think that it's going to be impossible to have a qualitative
type conversation with these people if you want to
communicate with them. It's got to be quantitative.
It has to be exact. That's like you're typing
commands into a computer. Has to be specific zeros and
ones. You can't get into big
conversations with these people because on says, once again, the
whole idea was to get something anything on record in regards to
the Air Force. America's are sovereignty and
this issue. Well, let me tell you something,
these people are not going to put themselves out there where
they can be criticized or had their careers damaged and I
think that's why green wall has so much more success.
He doesn't force them to put themselves out there, he just
asked for copies of reports so they're able to do it and and
not worry about being criticized over, it goes on.
It says, the last thing I wanted to do is publish a story about
how the defense department won't even acknowledge his questions.
I have an absolutely, the best experience with the dependent
with the dod public affairs. Over many years, we work with
them daily and what we do. The vast majority of those
interactions are hugely productive.
In fact, I've never had a negative relationship with the
US military public affairs officer, even on topics that
were far from positive, for the Department of Defense overall.
They do excellent work and understand our request and
Seth's. I'm with total professionalism
in timely matter, I cannot overstate how important their
job is, and how well, they usually do it with this.
In mind, I dreaded, having to take issue with a deity under
Communications operations, but after nearly three months of
getting no replies of any kind, I had to do something.
It wasn't till I sent a very Frank letter on December, 5th.
2019 that I received this answer from mrs.
Goff, this was a first actual correspondence I had with her.
since my inquiry was made in September and then it goes on to
say that, She says, my sincere, apologies, it appears that your
emails were being dumped into a junk spam folder instead of my
inbox. So I wasn't seeing anything from
you for a long time. Blah blah, blah blah blah and
then sir. I don't recall getting it was
felt mail from you. So basically just says sorry,
don't know who you are or what you want.
He says, I replied very positively, I was so glad we had
a breakthrough and I wouldn't have and it wouldn't have to
write about how unresponsive the dod's representatives.
This matter was even if they weren't willing to say much, we
would actually have that on the record.
And I made this cough aware of the internal documents that had
some answers to my questions that John Greenwald obtained.
So, at least I could get some commentary on those.
If anything else Above All Else. Our relationship could begin.
And it goes on and says, I was happy to be finally be working,
blah, blah, blah. I fold it quickly after response
asking if we could have this wrapped up by any of the weaker
reply starts it as such. Yeah, we should be able to you.
Thanks him for his patients following.
I could slap a deadline is then he goes on and says your reality
ended up being the complete opposite.
This is God, never got back to me.
What? Followed over the next four
weeks was me. Reaching out, looking for an
update and getting nothing back. This was different though.
As your original. Excuse, we're clearly false
because she just went back to doing the same thing even after
her apology and acknowledgement of a timeline by January 2nd,
2020, yet another month had gone by and it was clear that she had
gone dark once again. And then he goes back and forth
a little bit here, through the article and this Syndicate has
continued on for just several months.
It looks as though without read the entire article that
Greenwald has continued to get some information on the you on
the Air Force's response to UFOs.
But as you can see without asking these very direct
questions, where you're requesting specific documents
about specific instances, they're just not going to go on
record. Answering these generalized
questions it goes on. He says sadly.
We Just don't know. In fact, we don't even have a no
comment at this time. Regarding this issue from the
Pentagon spokesperson, the handling in the end.
It is in the Public's interest to know how the media is being
treated by the department defense on this issue.
After they themselves, help perpetuate it.
That's quite a long article about this whole situation but I
think you could see what's happening.
Here you have two different journals to type, both of them,
good journalist. But both of them have a very
different approach and how they try to get.
Disclosure from the US government.
Now the first follow the first fellow green wall.
As I stated, he has very limited specific.
Precise questions about any questions that are that are
directed toward acquiring evidence.
Lots of government documents and forms the second fellow.
As you can see. Is it ready question?
He's sensing these quite long involved.
Almost a little bit convoluted questions.
He's trying to have a conversation with a bureaucrat
about UFOs and they are having none of it.
It's almost like he overloaded their circuits and I think this
goes to show that if we're going to get if we have any hope of
receiving disclosure at any level, greenwald's got it
figured out, you asked short concise, clear questions and
you're asking for physical evidence in the form of
government documents. Payments.
And that's it. You don't, you can't, you can't
send them a paragraph long question and expect them to
answer it back. They're just not going to,
they're not going to put themselves out there and
jeopardize their career by saying the wrong thing and is
Greenwald has figured out. You're dealing with Gatekeepers
and so you want to allow you want to give these guys a way
out. If you're doing a foia request,
you want to make that question, short and simple.
And know what you're asking for so that they can go to come to a
computer file or a file cabinet, and they can physically get it
out. Make a copy for you, or they can
physically search it online in their database and send you the
copy. You want to make it that simple
short. Sweet?
Legalistic almost Don't bother trying to ask for generalize
disclosures because it's not going to happen anyway.
I like this article because it really shows the inside baseball
involved in UFL, investigatory work.
And in my opinion, green wall is probably the best.
There is out there and that kind of stuff until next time.
This is UFO warning over and out.
Don't bother trying to ask for generalize disclosures because
it's not going to happen anyway. I like this article because it
really shows the inside baseball involved in UFL, investigatory
work. And in my opinion, green wall is
probably the best. There is out there and that kind
of stuff until next time. This is UFO warning over and
out.