Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
Today's program is Fire from the sky and Chile fireballs fell
from the sky and the South American country of Chile
leaving behind patches of burned grass.
And debrisfuturism.com reports mysterious balls of fire rain
down in seven locations on a Chilean island last week, and
astronomers have no idea what they are.
Small flaming objects were first spotted on September 25th, crash
landing on the island of Chiloe in southern Chile.
CNET reports the objects were still so hot from their descent
through Earth's atmosphere they started a series of small fires,
lifescience.com reports. On September 28th, the Geologist
released their official assessment.
None of the seven sites contain traces of meteorite.
Since the mysterious objects weren't meteors, logic dictates
they must have been wayward space junk, BR g.com reports.
Still, the fact that no obvious debris was spotted near any of
the fiery crash sites is odd. If it was indeed man made debris
and it survived long enough to make it to the ground and set
foliage on fire, you would expect that there would be
something left over. I have to agree.
Personally, I thought NASA was tracking all of the space junk,
and that being the case, couldn't NASA just take a
reading off of one of their supercomputers that map every
bit of space joke junk floating around out there and let us know
if they're missing anything over Chile?
I don't know, perhaps Tom Delong and his company are already on
the ground, passing out pesos to farmers and collecting bits of
senders from the crash sites. On a serious note though, when
you look at how this event is reported, it's typical of so
much UFO reporting. Something happens that's
undeniable on September 25th. Since last month 2019, on the
island of Chiloa in Chile, they have confirmed seven different
instances of people seeing fireballs from the sky fall down
to the ground, impact the ground, not making any craters,
now, making small impacts and burning the area around where
they fell. Now most of these impact sites
from the pictures look to be about one or two feet across.
That's what happened. People looked up.
They observed fireballs falling from the sky.
They watched the fireballs fall to the ground and ignite and
small patches of burned of burned grass.
So we have we have the fireballs observed, we have the we have
the observation of the fireballs fall into the ground and then we
have the physical impact sites are left over which are just
simply circular burned areas. Now the government of Chile sent
out a geologist and scientist immediately to inspect the
sites. They physically went out there,
they took samples. And what they found was that in
all of the seven confirmed sites, there was no other
material than the burn vegetation, There were no
meteorites, there were no space junk, nothing.
Whatever impacted these sites immediately dissipated or burned
up. So that's what we know for sure.
We know beyond a shadow of a doubt because people witnessed
it and we've taken test Fireballs were observed in the
sky. Fireballs were observed falling
from the sky. Fireballs were observed causing
small impact areas a foot or two across where vegetation was
burned. But no other physical evidence
was left over. That's all we know.
So the government scientists went out, They took samples of
this burn vegetation and very quickly within three days came
back and said these were not meteorites.
Zero chance, no meteorites, nothing.
No evidence here. They ruled it out immediately.
Not meteorites. The second thing they said was
there's no evidence of space junk.
If this would happen to have been space junk, then it was
very special space junk because as soon as it landed on the
ground, it dissipated, caused a small fire, and dissipated.
That's not what we normally see when space junk falls to Earth.
It isn't. It doesn't stay intact long
enough to land on the ground, and all seven cases lands on the
ground causes a small fire dissipates.
Now that's all we know. So that leaves us with a third,
a third, a third cause. And that is, if it's not, if
it's not man made, if it's not natural, then it has to be some
type of unidentified phenomena. Whether you want to call that
UFOUAP, whatever you want to call it, it's unidentified.
Well, I don't know what's wrong with saying that That we don't
know, but for some reason, fake news the mainstream media is not
capable of saying, we don't know.
And there has been a barrage of reporting this week.
And quite frankly, it's annoying because every mainstream article
you read includes one or two obligatory jokes about aliens,
little green men, Area 51, some something stupid like that.
That's got nothing to do with it, with it, with with what
happened. And then it will contain a quote
or two from the debunkers. And I don't know if these guys
are paid, if they're idiots or if they're just incompetent
because all of these guys come out and say, well, it it was it
was a meteorite. And then they go on to Heckle
and mock people who say no, it it's not a meteorite, they they
lie in the face of the actual scientific investigation.
Chile sent out geologist. These are legitimate scientist.
They took samples, they came back.
They said these impacts were not caused by meteorites, settled
were not caused by meteorites. But that doesn't matter to
Popular Mechanics because they're going to bring in people
who say, well, there were meteorites or they're going to
say, like the one fellow did, well, it wasn't a meteorite, but
it it had to be space junk. And then he goes on to say,
well, we'll know more. These things take a few days to
be figured out sometime hedge in the bets, baby.
We know that if it wasn't space junk, because First off, there
was no evidence of space junk. Secondly, NASA tracks all the
space junk. They have to track the space
junk. If NASA didn't track the space
junk, every astronaut that went to the space station would be in
mortal danger of being hit by this stuff.
So they have to keep track of every piece of space junk.
If that was space junk that came back that came down there, NASA
would know about it. And if they didn't know about
it, well, we're in big. Those astronauts are in big
trouble because NASA's not doing its job.
But I strongly suspect that NASA did know about it.
And NASA knows it's not space junk.
And in fact, some articles, exports have come forward and
said no, listen, it wasn't space junk.
There was nothing being tracked around there.
But that doesn't stop the debunkers from throwing that in
the water to muddy things up a bit and then and then say, well,
these things take time, muddy it up a little bit more.
No, they don't take time. It took three days.
It was very simple actually. People saw fireballs come down.
They saw fireballs land. They saw small fires at the
impact sites. The government of Chile
immediately sent geologists out. They took samples from the
impact site. They inspected everything and
the scientists came back and said these were not meteorites.
So please quit saying they were meteorites.
They were not meteorites. They also said if this is space
junk, it's the weirdest space junk we've ever said.
That's that's pretty much what they said.
If it's space junk, it's the weirdest space junk we've ever
seen, because it's a special kind of space junk.
I came down out of the sky, it impacted, it caused a fire, and
it dissipated to the point where there's no trace, not a single
trace of manmade metal at these sites.
Secondly, NASA is not coming forward and saying hey we're
missing some space junk. So whatever happened in Chile
was not a meteorite and it was not space junk, no matter what
the debunkers and the socalled armchair scientists are saying.
No matter what mainstream news puts out, no matter how many
jokes Popular Mechanics makes about aliens, little green men,
and booster rockets falling off a Chinese launches, it's got
nothing to do with what happened in Chile.
Seven events occurred, 7 balls of fire fell from the sky,
witnessed. 7 balls of fire landed on the ground and ignited
small fires one to two feet across.
Witness Chile investigators went to the site.
They tested the impact site, tested it, took samples from the
from the charred remains, took samples from the soil and
determined conclusively these were not meteorites and there is
no evidence of space junk, no manmade materials, no manmade
residue. Something fell from the sky,
caused a incendiary impact, and we have no evidence for what it
was. But you know, I'm okay with
that. It's Okay sometimes not to know
we don't have to give a bad explanation when we don't have
an explanation. And I'm at the point when
mainstream media and the debunkers want to come out and
every time something like this happens that's not explainable
and their first instinct is to mock and ridicule legitimate
scientific investigation. I'm at the point I don't feel
like I need to be nice to those people about this anymore.
I think it's time maybe that the UFO investigators begin to mock
the debunkers because they're the ones that are coming up with
the crazy conspiracy theories. The facts speak for themselves.
7 fireballs, 7 impacts, 7 zones that were incinerated, one to
two feet across Scientifically investigated.
Not meteorites, Not manmade material.
What happened? Who knows?
Bowl lightning? I don't know.
Maybe the fact is we don't know. Stop by the website
ufowarning.blogspot.com, check out the show notes, check out
the links and see what you think.
Very interesting story down there in Chile.
Until next time this is UFO warning.
Over and out.