Hello, and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we look at Congress guts UFO disclosure
bill. That's correct.
Congress guts UFO disclosure bill.
Now, I've been saying for a long time, people are not going to
get what they want. I know a lot of folks were very
hopeful that somehow Congress was going to force the DoD to
tell us what they know about UFOs.
I've been saying from the beginning, that will never
happen. OK, and I'm being proved right
once again. This article from the New York
Times does kind of soft sell it, but it breaks the bad news.
Congress orders UFO records released but drops bid for
broader disclosure. A newly passed measurement
directs the National Archives to collect documents related to
UFOs and disclose confidential records within 25 years, but
stops short of ordering. More transparency?
Yeah, no transparency for you. And if you want to see
something, you're going to have to wait 25 years.
Well, we were supposed to see the stuff from Kennedy
assassination within 25 years. Six years later, nothing,
Nothing. No president has ever released
this stuff. OK, Same thing with a recent
pandemic that we had going around and they made that little
bit of a juice sauce that we're supposed to put in our body.
People wanted to see the ingredients for that stuff, and
they wanted to see the paperwork on it.
We'll get back to you in 75 years.
In other words, you can't have it telling somebody they can't
see something for 25 years or 60 years or 75 years.
You might as well just tell them they can't see it.
OK, they can't see it. The article goes on and says
Congress. It's written by Kayla GAO or Gu
Guo. It says that December 14th,
2023, Congress passed legislation on Thursday that
directs the government to eventually tell the people at
least some of what it knows about UFOs, but stops short of
more aggressive steps. Lawmakers sought to force
greater transparency and unidentified phenomena and
extraterrestrial activity. The measure, which was tucked
into the annual defense policy bill that one final approval
with a bipartisan vote, directs to National Archives to collect
government documents about unidentified anomalous
phenomena, technologies of unknown origin, and non human
intelligence. Hey, but they told us in that
congressional hearing that there was nothing there that violated
the laws of physics. So how could they be unknown or
non human? How?
How would we know that under the provision which President Biden
is expected to sign into law, any records not already
officially disclosed must be made public within 25 years of
their creation unless the president determines that they
must remain classified for national security reasons?
Lawmakers in both chambers have ratcheted up efforts to increase
government transparency surrounding UFOs and
extraterrestrial matters as conspiracy theories.
Here you go. She can't help herself.
She can't. She had an OK article somewhat
presenting the facts, but she can't help herself.
She has to insult the taxpayers. Conspiracy theories proliferate
and suspicious persist that the government is concealing
information from the public. Well Miss GAO, I would suggest
that you take a look at that. The fine article put up there on
Mr. Sanders website quoting him and Mr. Grassley, both US
Senators by the way, where they inform us that the DoD cannot
account for $1.55 trillion, half their spending.
That's not a conspiracy. That's two long term United
States Senators from both sides of the aisle, miles apart on the
political spectrum. They're both telling us, hey
man, we've got a problem with the DoD.
They've lost half their stuff. But yet this writer has the
nerve to call people like you and I conspiracy theorist
because we have questions about being lied to.
OK, if you, your banker has been known to embezzle money
repeatedly. It's not a conspiracy theory
where your banker tells you that she might be a little bit short
in a checking account that you haven't written a check on in
two years. OK?
When people cheat or organizations cheat, we tend to
question them after that. And we have never had this
reconciliation process to restore trust.
We've never restored trust in that partner or that banker, OK?
And we've never restored trust in our own government.
We had a present shot and killed and there's never been a proper
investigation or explanation of what happened.
They're still holding evidence 60 years later.
OK, 60 years later still can't see the evidence.
Same thing with 9/11. Can't get the video from the gas
station across from the Pentagon, can't release it.
All these, all these just like I said with with with the recent
pandemic or as I always call a scam damage.
A certain shot that they wanted everybody to take.
You couldn't see the ingredients in that shot for 75 years.
That's not a conspiracy theory. That's a conspiracy fact.
The article goes on and says this is a major, major win for
government transparency on UAPS, and it gives us a strong
foundation for more action in the future, said Senator Jack
Schumer. Chuck Schumer, the Majority
Leader, using the acronym for Unidentified Arrow, anonymous
Phenomena, the government term for UFOs, and unidentified
objects. But the measure is far weaker
than what Mr. Schumer and other lawmakers in both parties had
saw. Mr. Schumer succeeded over the
summer in attaching A bipartisan measure to the defense bill that
would have established a presidential Commission with
broad power to declassify government records on UFOs model
after the panel that reviewed and released documents related
to President John F Kennedy's assassination.
Oh, that's rich. That is rich.
Documents we still haven't got after 60 years, OK?
The Republican LED House added a proposal by Representative Tim
Burchett, Republican of Tennessee, that would have
skipped any review and simply ordered the Defense Department
to declassify records related to publicly known sightings of
unidentified aerial phenomena that do not reveal sources,
methods or otherwise compromise the national security of the
United States. Unable to reconcile the two
competing approaches, negotiators who hammered out a
bipartisan compromise between the House and Senate on the
defense policy bill ended up dropping both Mr. Schumer's
measure and Mr. Burchett's. We got ripped off, Mr. Burchett
said. We we got completely hosed.
They've stripped out every part. Mr. Burchett said The
intelligence community rallied to kill his proposal and tamp
down more aggressive ones to compel broader disclosure.
Well, if they had to disclose what was going on, maybe we
would find out where the 1 1/2 trillion dollars is at.
I mean, they've got all these black projects that we can't
even we have. We can't even put a FOIA into
only a half a dozen or so senators even know what's going
on, reportedly. So they're unaccountable for
enough money to fund every taxpayer $9000.
OK, They have a parallel society constructed.
It's time people understand this.
Another person familiar with the talks, who insisted on anonymity
to describe them, noted that the Defense Department also had
pushed back forcefully on wider measures.
The measure that ultimately was included on the defense bill
grants government agencies wide latitude to keep records
classified. It permits government agencies
to determine whether public release of certain records would
pose a national security threat that outweighs the public
interest of disclosure. Records whose release would
demonstrably and substantially impair the national security of
the United States or constitute an unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy, for instance, would be exempted from
disclosure. Or perhaps maybe expose all the
nonsense that they're engaging in.
I don't know. It is really an outrage the
House didn't work with us on adopting our proposal for a
review board Mr., Schumer said. It seems that declassification
of UAP records will be largely up to the same entities that
have blocked and obfuscated their disclosure for decades.
I think he knows this. Senator Mike Brown's Republican
of South Dakota and a Co sponsor of Mr. Schumer's proposal,
echoed his disappointment on the Senate floor Wednesday, just
before the defense field passed. We are lacking oversight
opportunities and we're not fulfilling our responsibilities,
Mr. Round said. The Pentagon has begun stepping
up the number of explanations it provides for recent videos
showing unidentified phenomena, suggesting that pressure from
Congress for greater transparency has some early
results. Now.
I don't believe that. Give us the unredacted, give us
the unredacted documents, OK? Those videos of unidentified
phenomena captured by military sensors and released in recent
years and reports of by naval aviators of strange objects,
have fueled speculations about UFOs and extraterrestrial
activity. Some of those videos have been
explained as optical illusions or drones, but others remain
unexplained and have become the subject of white and
conspiratorial interests. There again, she likes that
word. Conspiratorial, You know, does
your head hurt, Miss GAO, when we ask you a hard question?
Is that why you have to use such nasty, insulting language toward
people? That's what I want to know.
This is a kind of garbage that you get in your mainline news
right here. Good old New York Times.
Just soft sell it. Basically, you've learned that
you're not going to be told anything and then if you ask a
question, you automatically become a conspiracy theorist.
Now just kind of show you what these guys have been up to.
And a good old DoD happened to come across this.
This is interesting. This is from thedailymail.cu.uk.
The date on this is December 15th.
So it just happened. The title says Pentagon blocked
from sending Taxpayer Dollars to Wuhan Lab.
Congress takes action in defense bill after $47 million was
funneled into grants for reprehensible animal
experimentation, including at China's COVID lab site.
Remember when we had Ron Paul accused Dr. Fauci of animal
abuse for funding experiments, as they call them?
I would call them a terroristic event where they took these
adorable little big ol pups, tied them out or caged them out
in the desert somewhere there in Northern Africa, infected them
with these terrible beetles that basically are fleas that ate
them alive. And he said, well, so we could
find a cure for this stuff. And Paul's like, no, you've
already got a cure, So what are you doing then?
You're either just tormenting animals for the fun of it, or
you're tormenting animals because there's money in it.
Disgusting stuff, man. And I'm supposed to trust these
people, and I'm supposed to trust them on UFOs.
I'm supposed to trust them on my health.
I'm supposed to trust them on my finances.
I don't think so. It goes on.
It says federal data reveals the Pentagon gave $47,000,000 to
Echo Health Alliance, which funded animal experiments at at
a lab in Wuhan, China. I wouldn't call them animal
experiments. I would just call them animal
torture. And I'm.
I'm not a vegan, OK? I'm just saying, hey, the Wuhan
Institute of Reality is accused of being the source of COVID-19.
The NDAA makes it illegal for the Pentagon to give money to
Equal Health China Research in Fiscal Year of 2024.
It's written by Kelly Lacco, executive editor.
It says Congress is taking action to block the Pentagon
from using taxpayer dollars to fund risky animal coronavirus
research in Wuhan, China. I think we all know somebody who
was affected died from COVID, maybe died from.
I think a lot of it was they died from not being given proper
treatment. They were denied access to
antibiotics and all the other stuff that works so well.
This is a provision within the fiscal year 2024 defense
Authorization bill which passed the House and Senate this week,
prohibits the Pentagon from funding experiments at the Wuhan
Institute of Virology, which is at the center of the COVID-19
lab leak theory. Senator Joni Erst, Republican
Iowa, who included the major in the NDA, told dailymail.com in
an executive interview this week that American dollars have been
diverted in the past to institutions and communist
China. I mean, are you OK with that?
I'm not. She's working to trace some
money and ensure that future taxpayer funds are not are not
spent on experimentation that is reprehensible to the American
public. The law also requires the
Department of Defense to conduct a 10 year audit to examine all
the money given specifically to Health Care Alliance.
Well, good luck on that. They just got through with an
audit where they couldn't account for half of their stuff.
Goes on and talks a little bit about some of the history of
that really super disturbing stuff.
And I just bring it up to show you that while the Defense
Department is telling you that you don't have a right to see
this UFO data, looks like they're still sending money to
the Wuhan lab after all the problems that happened over
there. Now, just to give you an idea of
how deceptive and just what kind of a red herring they were
throwing at you, here's an article from December 10th from
The Daily Beast. This is another one of your
mainline news media outlets that says Congress is taking a huge
step toward UFO transparencies and lawmakers are pushing for
the for the truth. And lawmakers pushing for the
truth aren't happy. And then they go on and tell us.
Congress is about to take perhaps his biggest step toward
transparency surrounding UFOs. But the lawmakers pushing for
change say the disclosure policy doesn't go far enough.
UFOs or UFP standing for unidentified and government
speak have been a hot topic on Capitol Hill for years.
Given a number of high profile disclosures, we really haven't
been disclosed to anything. They've they've thrown out some
bones to us here and there. We don't really don't know much
more now than what we did a couple years ago, but a hearing
over the summer with former intelligence officer and
whistleblower David Grush where he claimed the government was
concealing information like evidence of non human biologics
recovered from UFOs, took the frenzy to a new level.
It's not. It's not a frenzy.
People are just having questions about this stuff.
They wouldn't know Where did my 1 1/2 trillion dollars go to?
That hearing Put UFO policies front and center in the annual
defense bill, which had already been written in both chambers
before the hearing. Lawmakers from both parties,
including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, pushed
negotiators working out the differences between the House
and Senate version of the bill to add new UFO disclosure laws
to the legislation that goes on. They're just so hopeful.
Just go back to sleep. We're going to go ahead and give
you guys everything you've been looking for because we are daddy
government and we love you. Well, we know how that turned
out. So one mainline media source
tells you that disclosure is coming, probably more than
likely, and bam, we're really doing something here.
And then when they pull the rug out from under you, just like
Lucy pulling the football away from Charlie Brown, and you're
falling on your rear end, then they tell you if you think that
your butt hurts, you're a conspiracy theorist.
Now we know our butt hurts. We've been lied to you so many
times. We've had the football pulled
out from under us so many times. We know what it's like to go
flying through the air, land on our backside and have the wind
knocked out of us. That's not a conspiracy theory.
And coming from the people who can't account for half of their
assets, that's rich. Now, finally we'll finish up
here at this News Nation. They covered a little bit too.
It says UAP disclosure bill revised 2 Key provisions
stripped. It's not revised.
OK, How much does that like News Nation?
Not revised. Gutted.
GUTTED Some lawmakers want more transparency on UAPS but have
been but have seen pushback 2 key UAP revisions taken out of
the Department of Defense bill Tim Burchett They're studying
something over there with our money boy on on the money right
there. They're studying something over
there with our money. Yes, if it costs a lot of money,
I suppose to keep these UFOs stashed away in spatial
environments. I don't know.
Two key provisions were deleted from the Department of Defense
spending bill regarding the requirement to make any
information on UA PS public. Some lawmakers have been pushing
for more transparency around unidentified aerial phenomena
and have taken a step toward that goal by including in the
annual defensive funding bill a provision requiring disclosure
of classified records relating to UA PS, but not before
stripping out key portions of the major.
As for the UAP report, whistleblower David Grash called
it a mixed bag of success. He credited the senators for
keeping in a provision that fences off money for illegal
spatial access programs, but overall says the watered down
version presented last week doesn't do enough.
I don't think it does anything Fences off money for illegal
spatial access programs. I don't know.
Is he talking about Wuhan there or is he talking about putting
up an apartment complex for how many ever non biologic life
forms we have running around? Coulthard says he's excited for
UFO whistleblower's first hand information.
One of the next provisions would have created an advisory panel
whose members are chosen by the president.
This group would have been tasked with sorting through
which records would be disclosed.
Yet that tells you right there who has the power to disclose
this stuff, the executive branch or the DoD.
The DoD has clearly become a government unto itself.
That's why we call it the deep state.
So there's something to be aware of.
Don't expect these guys to give you disclosure, then it goes on,
it says. However, Schumer says the bill
doesn't go nearly as far as he intended.
The senator blames House Republicans for fighting against
his efforts, for more transparency.
This is a good guy, bad guy thing, good cop, bad cop.
Schumer knew the same wasn't going to go anywhere.
He's been in Washington for 50 years, OK?
He just created a limited hangout long enough for the DoD
to come in. Get to these two Republicans on
these committees and say this doesn't go anywhere.
I mean, when the deep state can listen to every single one of
your phone calls, read every single one of your messages,
your text messages, listen to your conversations with friends,
because your friends all have cell phones, so they're
recording maybe every word that comes out of your mouth with
these high, high level politicians.
Wouldn't surprise me if they didn't.
Their houses weren't bugged. I mean, a lot of really bad
stuff happening somewhere along the lines.
One of those guys might have used a word he shouldn't have
used, might have said something, shouldn't have said, might have
gotten angry, might have been human.
And maybe they just played a recording of what he said, the
words out of his mouth and put it on blast and said, how would
you like to talk about this in front of your constituents?
Now you're going to do what we're going to do.
That's the kind of control they have over these people.
That's why the only disclosure that we're going to get is going
to come from the grass roots. You're going to get more
disclosure from the accounts that I read off of these UFO
reporting sites than you're ever going to get from these guys.
They're never going to tell you the truth.
And if they tell you something that you think is the truth,
it's probably going to be shaped in a way that they can control
the narrative, which means they can control you.
They convinced half the world to lock themselves in their house a
couple years ago. Think about it.
Think about the power of suggestion these people have.
It was a major psychological experiment.
And look what happened to our economy.
Trillions of dollars missing. I know I've heard two or $3
trillion missing. Kind of like with the with the
DoD a million and a half trillion gone it's time for
people to wake up. Quit being children.
Think for yourself now you've seen what happened here with
this whole disclosure attempt. You had good people like
Tennessee Rep Tim Birchard or the the the the Miss Luna gal
from I think Florida or Matt Gatz Gates I guess is his name.
They've all tried OK, but they are up against a multi trillion
dollar organization that has the capacity.
To listen to every word that comes out of their mouth.
Now, who do you think's going to win that we'll have to just
separate ourself from that? Now, I'm not saying that you
don't pay your taxes or you don't obey the laws.
Of course you do. But if you want to find
disclosure, find it on our own. You have to look up in the sky
yourself. Read the reports.
Talk to other people about it, because you're never, ever going
to get disclosure from the Deep State.
Until next time. This is UFO warning.
Over now.