Hello, and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're talking about a UFO loophole.
That's correct. A UFO loophole, Yes.
It seems as though there may be legislation in place that's
actually keeping our elected officials from finding out about
UFOs while private contractors to the military are kept in the
loop. wowifoundthisarticle@mashable.com
Written by Matthew Phelan dated February 22nd, 2025 Title says
some UFOs may be hidden from our national leaders.
Our ballistic, our ballistic missile defense people were very
concerned. I would think so.
An unassuming loophole might be giving the US government and its
private contractors free reign to withhold evidence of
unidentified craft traveling well above our skies in outer
space. Now look at the verbage he uses.
You're at the very beginning and unassuming loophole.
Right off the bat, they're giving these guys the benefit of
the doubt. Hey, we just accidentally kind
of slipped this little piece of language into the legislation
that keeps representatives and senators and presidents out of
the loop, but leaves corporate officers in the loop unassuming.
Not intentional. Yeah.
That's the argument made by former Capitol Hill policy
advisor and attorney Dylan Guthrie, published this January
in the Harvard National Security Journal, a publication run by
Harvard Law School. So we have some insiders talking
about this. So might be a little bit limited
on the amount of truth that we actually get.
Guthrie spent three years as a legislative assistant to Senator
John Kerry covering national security issues and later worked
directly for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
He describes his this UFO loophole as kind of a
definitional gap. Now, once again, they're
downplaying the seriousness of this thing.
You can call it whatever you want to call it, but the result
is elected officials are being kept out of the loop.
This is the whole concept of the deep state goes on and says
Congress has redefined what were formally called unidentified
flying objects. Well, I still call them UFOs.
To 1st unidentified aerial phenomena, UAP and 2021, and
then the following year to unidentified anomalous
phenomena, also UAP, Guthrie told Measurable.
Like I always say, define the terms, define the narrative as.
Americans have been learning a lot lately in the age of Elon
Musk's Doge and we'll get into that in just a minute.
I'll give you a couple of examples.
The devil is in the details when it comes to the nation's large
and complex federal bureaucracies.
And antiquated mid century sci-fi concept like unidentified
flying Objects packed a lot of assumptions into one short
acronym. That's the reality lawmakers
determined would hinder good faith efforts to seriously
investigate more credible cases of UAP reported by U.S. military
personnel in recent years. So in other words, all these
UFOs that the general public has been talking about for years and
years, well, those are just too wacky.
We're not really interested in about that.
We're going to rename these things and then we're going to
we're going to frame the narrative however we want to.
Now, I want you to put this in the backdrop of something here.
Just stop and think for a second about how much your government,
your Department of Defense spends with private contractors.
I, I looked this up on ChatGPT and it told me in fiscal year
2023, the US Department of Defense, that's the DoD
allocated nearly $431.4 billion in private sector contracts,
marking a nine percent increase from the previous year.
I'm just thinking about that $431 billion you figure probably
got 300 million legal citizens plus another 100 million
illegal. That's a little over $1000 per
person that lives in this country.
That's an awful lot of spending. This spending encompasses a wide
range of services, including weapons development and
equipment maintenance, consulting services, and
Technical Support. Notably, over half of this
contractor spending is concentrated in seven states,
Virginia, California, Texas, Maryland, Florida, Pennsylvania
and Alabama. I just think about this, why
should these seven states out of the 50 get all this money?
These states host numerous defense contractors that play
pivotal roles in supporting the DOD's mission.
However, recent developments indicate potential shifts in
defense spending. President Donald Trump's
administration has proposed an 8% annual reduction in the
defense budget over the next five years, aiming to reallocate
funds to other priorities such as border security and drone
technology. This proposal has introduced
uncertainty within the defense sector, potentially impacting
future allocations to private contractors.
Well, could you imagine that? Additionally, Elon Musk's
Department of Government Efficiency initiative is
influencing the defense contracting landscape.
While traditional defense contractors may face challenges
due to cost cutting measures, companies specializing in
advanced technologies such as Palantir technologies might
benefit from increased investment and AI solutions.
These evolving many factors under score the dynamic nature
of defense spending and its implications for private
contractors supporting the DOD's objective.
Well, the fact is we're spending a lot of our national wealth on
defense, OK? So that means where there's
money, there's power, and we should be concerned when we find
out these guys are doing things to keep our politicians out of
the loop. Now the article goes on, it says
Congress has refined what were formerly called identified
flying, flying objects to your first aero phenomena and then of
course, to anomalous phenomena. Then it continues and says, did
the Navy pilots who witnessed the now notorious 2015 Go Fast
UFO, for example, really see something that was
aerodynamically flying or was it just floating like a balloon?
Was it or any other strange airborne citing truly a hard
physical object? Or were these cases all
something more amorphous and temporary like the plasmaphyte
air of ball lightning? Well, I'm not going to talk
about 2015 Go Fast video without questioning the chain of custody
on that thing. It would have been helpful if we
could have found out who it was in the parking lot that this was
passed off to. Just like so many things in the
Pentagon, we don't have chains of custody.
We just have videos that show up unexplained and then people make
lots of money talking about them.
As a term, UAP has offered a more broad and empirically
conservative bucket for some of these still as yet unexplained
events, categorizing them in a way that is not just more
palatable to scientists and government officials.
It also has made it harder for a secretive US defense and
intelligence agency to dodge the new annual reporting
requirements now mandated by Congress as part of the National
Defense Authorization Act. Where that's the idea, in
theory. So what they're, I guess, kind
of trying to say here is that they changed the term UFO.
This is Congress's feeble attempt to force these private
contractors to tell us to tell Congress at least what they know
about UFOs. And I have little hope that
that's going to happen. I think the only way this is
going to be changes with this stuff is you're going to change
behavior by changing the budgets.
Now it goes on down here. It says a careful study of the
NDAA's most recent definition for UAP, as Guthrie noted in his
new article, indicates that a that data of any unidentified
space born only objects may be exempt.
Think about that. Data of any unidentified
spaceborne only objects may be exempt.
That's kind of what a UFO is, isn't it?
Under that current statutory definition, there are three
kinds of unidentified anomalous phenomena, Guthrie told
measurable. The first are airborne objects
or phenomena that are not immediately identifiable.
The second are submerged objects or phenomena that are not
immediately identifiable. So these would be unidentified
objects and the sea domain are underwater, and then there's
this third category of UAP, which are trans medium objects,
he continued. Those that are observed to
transition between, on one hand, space and the atmosphere, and on
the other hand between the atmosphere and bodies of water.
Just under that strict reading of the definition, Guthrie said,
there is no space born, only UAP.
Any U.S. intelligence agency or branch of the military, in other
words, that track the spacecraft circling but respecting Earth's
border would be free to legally withhold that.
Incredible data from Congress and dozens of very recent cases
like this may very well exist. Last November, the Defense
Department official UAP investigators with this all
Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, a ARO, discloses that no
less than 49 of last year's 757 cases and their annual
unclassified report involved strange sightings of UAP in
outer space. So this is this is just more
legalese to keep you out of the loop.
Clearly they are procuring lawfare on us.
Aro's 2024 report emphasized, however, that none of the space
domain reports originated from space based sensors or assets.
Rather, all of these reports originated from military or
commercial pilots or ground observers.
But Chris Mellon, formerly a minority staff director for the
Senate Intelligence Committee and a deputy assistant Secretary
of Defense under President Bill Clinton and George W Bush,
believes that this lack of censor data is likely a failure
of reporting. Yeah, the same names keep
popping up all the time, don't they?
Why is it that none of America's unparalleled space surveillance
systems captured and reported what these pilots observed?
Mellon asked in an essay for the technology news website The
Debrief this month. Did these systems actually fail
to capture any data? Or is this another case, the
former Pentagon official continued, in which the
information is simply not being shared with AARO or Congress?
If the pilots and ground observers were mistaken, cross
referencing with these systems would help confirm that as well.
Well, there's no way in the world they're going to tell you
this stuff that goes on and says Mellon, a long time advocate for
transparency on UAPI, got to stop once again.
Hasn't Christopher Mellon implied that he was the one that
passed off the tic tac video to Louis Elizondo in the Pentagon
parking lot? Didn't he say that?
Am I missing something here? If I'm incorrect, please let me
know in the comments. Melanie, long time advocate for
transparency. I'm not seeing that at all.
Recounted his own past government service experiencing
experienced supervising one of these systems, the ground based
Electro Optical deep space surveillance or geodesk stations
now managed by the US Space Force.
First established in the 1980s to effectively spy on spy
satellites and other foreign orbital platforms, geodes can
track objects as small as a basketball sailing 20,000 miles
or more above Earth's surface. Well you think they'll be able
to see some of these UFOs, wouldn't you?
Many years ago, I asked a colleague visiting the Maui
Geodes site to inquire if the system had recorded anything
unusual in the night skies lately, Mellon recalled.
Sure enough, just a month or so earlier, the system recorded
what appeared to be 4 to 5 bright objects travelling
parallel to the horizon. GOS personnel reportedly were
baffled. These gleaming objects appeared
to be at once too slow and consistent in their trajectory
to be meteors, but too fast, hot and high up in space to be any
known aircraft site. Personnel had no idea what the
objects wore and in those days had no incentive to acknowledge
or report that data. According to Mellon, that
incident occurred in the 1990s, when the jihadist system was far
less capable than it is today. Well, if they aren't reporting
this invasion of her skies, and what good are they?
And as Guthrie told mentionable, the full suite of America's
space monitoring, missile defense and early warning
platforms could easily be recording critical, perhaps
world changing evidence about UAP, which could reveal if it's
another nation's advanced spacecraft, something mundane or
something truly unknown. Data from these systems,
including the Space fence, Norad's solid-state phased array
radars, that's s s bar S bar, the space based infrared
monitoring system, SBIRS and others could also be kept under
wraps based on just this one technicality.
So in other words, we're not going to tell you if if there
are no requirements to report on space born only UAP, Guthrie
said. Then there are no requirements
by elements of the defense and intelligence communities to
report on those objects using these spatially sensitive space
collection sensors. That's why they can stand right
up there, lie to you straight face, put their hand in the
Bible, swear an oath and say I didn't tell you anything that
wasn't true. They've already got their
answer. They've already they've already
got their way out written into the law.
It goes on and says the now well known 2004 USS Nimitz Tic Tac
UFO incident made famous by the New York Times in 2017 and
testified to Underoath in Congress included the monitoring
of similar similar objects, according to veteran Navy radar
operator Kevin Day. Notice how the author here
didn't didn't devote one sentence to the chain of custody
on this stuff. Then a senior chief Petty
Officer supervising radar efforts on board the USS
Princeton, a guided missile cruiser with the Nimitz Carrier
Strike Group. They told Mashable that crew
tasked with looking out for ICBM warheads saw these unexplained
tracks moving up at 80,000 feet. Our ballistic missile defense
people were very concerned at day tool measurable greater
engagement with these kinds of potential UAP risk does not
appear to be on the way from some of the United States best
unclassified collection tools. The worldwide network of
astronomical observatories and satellites managed by NASA.
Despite much fanfare around NASA's announcement of a
dedicated director of UAP research in 2023, the position
has been left quietly vacant since September 2024, according
to a recent statement from the space agency's press office.
Always make a big show and make a big announcement that nothing
happens. Guthrie chalks the crux of this
problem up to an absence of overarching political oversight.
Now this is called a conspiracy of silence, OK?
This is how they maintain their power.
There have been so many agencies that have been alleged to have
been or currently be involved in the UAP matter, he explained.
It's all too easy for any of these agencies to pass the buck.
Well, he's definitely giving these guys a pass.
What I see here is these agencies, the people within
these agencies recognizing the raw power involved with UFO
knowledge and they're grabbing as much of it as they can for
themselves. Goes on and says Guthrie hopes
lawmakers will take up the advice offered by former
Pentagon official Louis Elizondo.
Oh boy, He's going to quote Louis now, who told Congress
last November amid selling his book, if I remember correctly,
that it should be create a single point of contact
responsible for a whole of government approach to the UAP
issue. Currently, the White House, CIA,
NASA, the Pentagon, Department of Energy and others play a
role, but no one seems to be in charge, Elizondo said, leading
to unchecked power and corruption.
Yep, help them pass it back, Louis.
I think we know who's in charge. The deep state is in charge, and
I think that Louis came the closest to telling us the truth
when he explained this very elite group at the very top that
understands what these things are and is trying to make
contact with them. But even saying that he still
had to blame the Christian conservatives that he referred
to as a Collins elite had to blame those guys because he said
they were cutting off his his his funding, not the guys above
them that were in contact with what were what they thought were
likely evil entities. Now the people below them that
were trying to avoid that contact.
That's just the way though. Beyond redefining the strict
legal definition of what UAP means, or even creating a new
acronym that would bring clarity to this issue, Guthrie argues
that this more centralized whole of government approach also
could also help close up these kinds of loopholes.
Breaking down those stove pipes, as Guthrie put it, and along
with these stove pipes, the ability of a particular agency
to just say, oh, we don't feel the need to further act on this
matter. Well, you've got to hit them
where you can. And that's in the funding.
These guys are they're totally they're totally out of control.
Let's just take a look at a couple of examples here as an
example. I just wanted to probe Chat GPTA
little bit on this GB, this GODDS he's talking about which
is supposed to be looking for these deep space images.
And it says the ground based Electro optical Deep Space
Surveillance, or geodesk. GEODSS system is a critical
component of the US Space Surveillance Network SSN, tasked
with tracking and cataloguing deep space objects, including
active and inactive satellites, spent rocket bodies and other
debris orbiting Earth. Operating primarily at night
under clear sky conditions, GEODSS utilizes highly sensitive
1M telescopes equipped with advanced digital camera
technology, enabling the detection of objects 10,000
times dimmer than those visible to the naked eye.
Each of the three operational geodesk sites located in Maui,
Hawaii, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, and Diego
Garcia in the Indian Ocean is equipped with three telescopes
collectively tracking approximately 3000 objects per
night. Regarding its budget and
personnel, specific details about Geodes funding and
staffing levels are not publicly disclosed, as is common with
many defense related programs. To maintain operational
security. Yeah, and maybe some some
financial security for the people involved.
Just a thought. However, it's important to note
that Geodes operates under the purview of the US Space Force,
which overseas its maintenance and operations.
The system's capabilities have been enhanced over time, notably
through the Deep Stair program. Boy, that's almost a play on
words to Deep State program, which upgraded its digital
camera technology to improve tracking accuracy and
sensitivity. In summary, while Geodesk plays
a vital role in monitoring and tracking deep space objects to
support space situational awareness and national security.
Detailed information about its budget.
Personnel remains classified. So, yeah, we're going to look at
the skies. We're going to have a good long
look at what's up there, but we're not going to tell you what
we see. Just crazy.
I just want to finish up with this one last little antidote
about some of the craziness that Elon Musk has found recently,
him and his team of geniuses about the money being misspent
by federal employees. Now we're talking about
government secrecy and government waste goes right
along with this. According to ChatGPT is May, as
of May 2024, the federal government employed
approximately 2.28 million individuals.
Of these, about 1.2 million or 54% were required to work on
site full time due to the nature of their roles.
So at least you just under half didn't have to show up to work.
That remaining 1.1 million employees, 46% were eligible for
telework. Among the telework eligible
group, approximately 220,228 thousand employees of the total
federal workforce worked remotely full time.
The rest engaged in a hybrid model, splitting their time
between on site and remote work. That would sure be nice making
the kind of money that they make.
Regarding compensation, federal employees salaries vary based on
factors such as position, experience, and location, and
2024 the average federal salary exceeded $100,000, not including
the 5.25% average pay raise that year.
Did you get a $5000 raise last year?
When accounting for benefits, the total average compensation
was approximately $143,643. Specific salary data for
employees working from home full time isn't readily available,
but it's reasonable to infer that their compensation aligns
with the overall federal averages adjusted for specific
roles and localities. It's important to note that
telework policies have been evolving.
Yeah, blah blah blah look, working from home making
$143,000 This is this is the group of people that tells you
that you don't get to find out about UFOs.
And then we found out that we've, we've, it's been revealed
text messages to these people at home, sending back test text
messages to each other and their little work groups with messages
that I couldn't even repeat here because it would give this
podcast an adult rating. So that's what we're looking at.
We're looking at a bureaucracy, this huge behemoth of a thing,
money being spent where you're not allowed to know where it
goes. At people sitting at home
drawing huge checks. You're not allowed to know what
they do. In the background of that, we
have the most sophisticated equipment known to mankind,
peering into the skies, seeing things, recording things that
they refuse to tell even our elected officials.
And this is really the definition of a deep state.
It's where you send all your money into a black box and they
spend the money however they want to, and you are kept
completely in the dark about everything.
And they are able to protect that system with a souvenir of
people, employees who are profiting off the system, pigs
to the through. You can't get to the truth
because you have to get through a herd of pigs eating at the
through that surround the truth. I don't think any of this is
going to get better until we completely rearrange how we fund
this stuff. But I find this interesting that
they're putting this article out there.
To me, it's almost like they're trying to get ahead of the game
a little bit. Well, we would have told you
about UFOs, but technically we didn't have to.
And so we're just doing what we do.
And that is we keep the truth from you at every turn we can.
And we are allowed to put our hand on the Bible and swear in a
hearing that we're saying this or that.
And if you interpret that the wrong way, well, that's just too
bad because we're speaking in legal speak and you're trying to
speak in common sense language. It just shows you how these
people are deceiving us. Seven ways to Sunday.
Until next time, This is UFO warning over now.