Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
Today's topic? Deep State UFO coup.
That's correct, Deep State UFO coup.
It appears that just as a lot of people were expecting the
Defense Department i.e., the Deep State, to start divulging
some information about the UFO phenomena.
Ufo's, Uap's, whatever you want to call them.
It seems like just when a lot of people thought we were taking
that step after those Senate subcommittee hearings where
Marco Rubio ordered them or the Defense Department to begin to
prepare by annual reports talking about UFO's and what
they'd uncovered. Well in the midst of all that
hopefulness, it seems as though there may be a reason to doubt
that we're about to get disclosure from the US
government, the deep state, any of these guys.
And I refer to a tweet by theblackvault.com.
Now you can go over to the Twitter account UFO warning.
You can also get there by going to AT warning sub UFO while
you're there to do a follow back.
And I retweeted the first tweet that we're talking about here
from theblackvault.com and it's has it says simply Monday.
It is. So I'm assuming they're going to
break a story on Monday. And then it says hashtag UFO,
UFO, Twitter, #UFOs, hashtag AAT IP.
That's ATIP and hashtag, Black Vault hashtag FOIA.
Now that last hashtag is important and we'll get to that
in just a minute. And then it has a picture of a
Navy fighter here. And it says the fringe.
And then it says evidence of U.S.
Navy involvement and UFO program may have been destroyed.
That's correct. Evidence of U.S.
Navy involvement and UFO program may have been destroyed.
Wow. Just when you think that they're
coming clean. And now I have to wonder if this
is not in regard to Louis Elizondo and the former a tip
program, a ATIP. Remember it when this whole
thing first came out a couple years ago, three years ago, I
guess with the three Navy cockpit videos showing the
UFO's. Louis Elizondo alleged that he
had been in charge of this program and he know he course,
he had reason to know that these videos were were legitimate and
the military industrial complex they kind of came after, they
kind of came after Louis. They just said basically just
came out and called him a liar. And then as time went on we
found out that he wasn't lying. He was actually telling the
truth. And the whole thing just seemed
like it was, it was just, it was just a conspiracy to
delegitimize what Elizondo was saying.
And however you feel about the guy, he wasn't.
He wasn't lying about his service to the country, that's
for sure. And that all came out, and that
all came out in the Wash. But now it almost seems as
though after we've had this shift from UFO Investigative
Task Force, it appears to have shifted from the Navy and their
Department of Intelligence over to the Defense Department.
Which is a little scary in a way, because, you know, there's
been a lot of back and forth of President Trump in the last
couple of months with some of his top generals coming out and
just and just basically dissing him in public with his own
Defense Department head saying some things that a lot of people
thought were not the sort of things that the Defense
Department had should say it by his commanderinchief.
So there, there's already this tension going on in Washington,
DC between what many people call the Deep state, this, these
lifetime employees of the Defense Department or the
military or whatever, and the president of the United States.
Now you combine this with what's been going on with this UFO
investigative task force. You know, first we were told
that it didn't exist. And then when they were found
out, they found out that not only did it exist, but they had
one. They've had task force going on
before and after Elizondo. So a lot of people said, well,
why should we believe you? You know, some people came out
and accused the DoD of a flat out lying and then other people
came out and said, well, they weren't actually lying because
the people that said this really didn't have knowledge.
Doesn't matter. I mean we're we're talking about
clear facts here, provable facts.
Elizondo said that he rent a tip.
A lot of these guys came out and said they didn't know Elizondo.
They threw him under the bus and then it turned out that he
wasn't lying. So however you feel about the
guy, he doesn't deserve to have his reputation destroyed over a
bunch of falsehoods. Now that being said, I bring
this up because George Knapp, now this came out.
This was released a couple 3 hours ago.
The black vault tweet once again it says evidence of U.S.
Navy involvement and UFO program may have been destroyed.
It's pretty serious. You're talking about destroying
evidence. Now, it's bad enough that the
Navy gave somebody in the Navy at least gave these three
cockpit videos, you know the the go fast gimbal and flair, I
think gave those to the New York Times.
And then in turn Elizondo ended up with those videos which he
published. And then those videos later
were, it was clarified by the by the DoD that those things were
real. It's bad enough that they
weren't able to control the chain of custody with this UFO
evidence. Now it appears as though they
may have destroyed evidence First thing, I don't think they
destroyed it. I think it would be a lot more
likely that's hidden somewhere. Kind of like Hillary's emails.
I don't know. I'm starting to see a pattern
here, and it's not a good pattern.
It's a pattern of deception. I guess we'll have to wait till
Monday to find out what the Black Vault knows, but it looks
like it's going to probably be some big news because I also
have some tweets here. I retweeted from George Knapp
and like I said, you can go to the Twitter site UFO Warning.
Of course you can get there by going to AT warning.
Sub UFO would do a follow back. It says George Knapp says and
this was tweeted 2 days ago. Just when you think the
Pentagon's public affairs and FOIA offices may have entered a
new era of truth telling and transparency, they circle back
around to take another cheap shot at Louis Elizondo at Lou
Elizondo and ATIP Watch. Now the I have three I have 3
tweets here from George, and because the way that I retweeted
them, I'm going to read the bottom one first, because that
was actually the first tweet that George made.
Just when you think the Pentagon's Public affairs and
FOIA offices may have entered a new era of truth telling and
transparency, they circle back around to take another cheap
potshot at Lou Elizondo in a tip watch.
Well, First off, I don't think they've ever entered a new era
of truth telling and transparency.
I mean, you have the same players that have been there.
Look at Doctor Fauci. He's been there for what, 48
years? Something like that?
42 years? I mean, these people get in
these jobs and they either stay there for life or they stay
there for years and years and then they and then they migrate
through that revolving door into some other Defense Department
contractor, work there a while, they come back through the door
again. It's a revolving door.
So these people never leave the deep state paradigm.
They're just there permanently. So for the to say that they had
somehow, you know, had an epiphany and decided to start
telling the truth and be transparent, why would that even
be in their interest? I think he's operating from a
really, I'm sorry to say. I guess you could call it
hopeful. I would say naive.
And considering all the stories that George Knapp has broken
over the years. You know, I think he's being a
little too hopeful here old respect to George.
Now this says that the second point from George sorry I do not
have details. Heard from a DC contact that
some sort of statement is coming from the from DoD.
Don't know from whom. All these but goodies about how
ATIP wasn't a UFO program and Elizondo wasn't part of it.
Is DoD trying to sabotage its own credibility?
Well, I don't think DoD is trying to sabotage its own
credibility. The way I see it is this thing
is so big and so compartmentalized that the cat
got out of the bag. Louis being the cat, you know
they got these videos out somehow.
The one had been created in 2004 and the other two what, 2015,
then 2017. Elizondo releases them with the
help of New York Times through the Academy of the Stars, and
it's just too big. And now I've watched some of
Elizondo's stuff on The History Channel.
I I find it to be pretty entertaining.
And you know, I've been pretty critical of him and Delong in
their group as far as them getting this unrestricted access
to these videos three years before anybody else did.
And I don't really trust them on everything, you know, especially
with the DoD contracts and and some of the comments about Tom
has made and he comes off as being kind of arrogant talking
to him about certain UFO situations and him saying, well,
that's not open for discussion now, that kind of stuff.
But just talking about Louis Elizondo personally, I find the
stuff that he that he's a part of, he creates or whatever on
that I've seen on The History Channel and whatnot.
I find it to be interesting. I find a lot of it to be
credible and I I find it to be incredibly engaging.
Now that's with or without him having been the former head of
ATIP, I would almost have more trust and respect for Louis if
he'd never been involved with the government.
So this is a case, you know, of this heavy handedness that we
see from the from the deep state all the time.
It's almost as like they're angry with Louis because somehow
he put the paradigm out there, he changed.
He mean he put he changed the narrative a little.
He just puts, he put a little bit of truth out there and then
the paradigm took on its own, its own being.
The narrative took on, took on its own narrative.
And I think these guys are angry because they've been trying to
control the narrative for so long.
And I'd really believe that them allowing Louie to get a hold of
these videos and stuff and release it publicly was their
way of trying to convince everybody that these things are
are a threat. I think some of them are a
threat, but I'm not sure that all of them are.
And secondly, anytime the Deep State tells me something, I have
to really double, triple, quadruple look at it before I
believe it. So what I'm seeing happening
right here right now is the Black Vault apparently has got
back some documents that they've obtained through FOIA.
And in those documents, perhaps the Department of Defense is
once again throwing Louis Elizondo under the bus.
And you have to ask yourself, how many times can they throw a
man under the bus and have him still survive?
I would be a little concerned myself if I was Louie, because
sometimes these guys, they can get pretty dark.
And I wonder if somehow this thing has gotten a little bigger
than they thought it would. Or maybe he's done or said some
little thing to anger them. But you know what they say.
First they destroy your character, then they destroy
you. So if I was Louie, I mean, I
don't know, I I would be really, really concerned about this
situation. Now.
I think most of the people across the country don't follow
this stuff close enough to really be aware of all the
minutia, all the little details. I think most people that follow
the UFO situation, the UFO culture, are aware of who Louis
Elizondo is. They have some notion of the
fact that he was in charge of this government UFO
investigative deal. I think that he comes across as
a very likable guy on camera, all right?
And I think they enjoy the product that's putting out
there. And I almost, I have to wonder
personally if he's not being too effective, if they're not
starting. And maybe they've run these
scenarios to their supercomputers and they realize
that the average person out there believes Elizondo and the
people that he has on his show, and they don't believe the
government. Maybe they realized that the
cat's gotten out of the bag. And I'm concerned for Louis that
they're going to try to go out there and just destroy him
somehow to make him so unlikable that people won't believe what
he's saying. And honestly, I don't think he
deserves that. So I'm a little bit, my Spidey
senses are enlightened, just a little bit.
You know, I'm not sure how he's crossed these people up, but
they really seem to be out to discredit him.
And you know, when you got these kind of people trying to
discredit you, you could have a serious problem.
Now it goes on here and George has another tweet.
He says, OK, it won't be a statement.
DoD sent detailed response to a four year request.
I'm referring to the person who submitted the request to share
the info with the public. Wow, that's interesting.
I'll read it one more time. OK.
It won't be a statement. Well, no, I don't think that.
I don't think the Department of Defense wants to come out there
and just trash Louie because they kind of did the last time.
Kind of I thought. And then Louis, just like, no,
here's the paperwork, man. I I was in charge of this deal
and then some other people came for like, yeah, yeah, we we all
work together now. It wasn't like a $200 million a
year outfit, but it was just a little task force.
And so then people were like, well, why are you lying about
this guy for what's the, what would you even care?
So see, that's why there's not going to be a statement.
Now they're going to release documents.
And apparently the documents aren't really getting the job
done effectively because sounds like some people have said them
and they're just like, yeah, they're going to trash them on
paper, but they're not going to, they're not going to come out
and make a a statement. We're going back to this notion
of directed speech. They want to talk down to you.
You don't get asked questions in this classroom.
They just tell you what it is. So that's why sometimes we're
forced to read between the lines.
When we get a piece of paper and half the lines are blacked out,
well then we have to read between the lines.
And you got to wonder, man, what are they going to say about poor
Louie here Monday if the Black Vault releases those documents?
And I got to wonder, it sounds like, and I'm making an
inference, I'm making an assumption here.
I know it's not supposed to be something to do but you know it
looks when you when you compare these tweets between George
Knapp and then the Black Vault a couple days later, it looks like
to me I'm going to make an assumption that the Black Vault
has got some FOIA paperwork back and the DoD is trash talking
Louie again, that's what I'm looking at.
But then at the same time I have to wonder what's going on
because the Black Vault, he ain't swallowing it.
What's his headline Evidence of U.S.
Navy involvement and UFO Program may have been destroyed.
You see it looks like to me and I'm going to make.
I'm going to go out on a limb here.
It looks to me like the Deep State is coming out one more
time and just trying to throw old Louie under that bus.
But in the meantime, what they did was possibly they've
revealed that they've destroyed or hidden UFO evidence that we
were supposed to get a look at. You see, every time they make an
aggressive move towards somebody who's trying to tell the truth,
it comes back to bite them. That's what you have to remember
about the situation. If you're on the side of truth,
eventually you'll win because you can't tell enough lies to
cover up a lie. And the truth is, Lou, you work
for these guys. I mean, he showed that so that
if they're planning on coming back out and trying to discredit
this guys again, I don't get it. Why would you try to discredit
somebody a second time when the first time didn't work?
And to beat that, it sounds like they may have been caught
destroying evidence. Wow, it's pretty serious stuff.
OK, so like I said last week, okay it won't be a statement.
DoD sent a detailed response to a FOIA request.
I'm deferring to the person who submitted the request to share
the info with the public. So it looks like that may be
that may be on the way to happening now.
I had a couple other things here I want to look at real quick,
and I'm going to have to go to my my Twitter to find this
before I get to Louis Elizondo. And I got a couple things I want
to point out on him. I want to put this in the
context of something that happened last week that was
really strange. We're talking about this deep
state coup, this deep state UFO coup, which it appears that
Elizondo may be a victim of. That's some pretty scary stuff.
Put that in the context of what else is going on.
I mentioned earlier in the podcast how many of Trump's
generals, he's even his own head of Department Defense, Mark
Esper, seem to have really dissed him at at several points.
In times where where a lot of people thought, boy, these guys
didn't get fired, it seems like there's it's it's basically an
insurrection against the commanderinchief at times.
And a lot of people, myself included, see this as a conflict
between the duly elected president and the deep state.
Or some people even see it as a conflict between the deep State
and Q Anon. Now I know Q Anon is I haven't
really been a big fan of it because it's all done
anonymously. But when things like this
happened, it kind of gets my tackles up a little bit.
I got to wonder what's happening.
And this comes from the apnews.com.
It says AP Morning News wire, Let's see if we can get this one
second here. We got to bring this up and we
had a situation occur with President Trump and a comment he
made on Q Anon. It says After Trump, after
Trump, Praise Pence decries Q Anon's Conspiracy Theory by
Megan Kennard came out yesterday.
Vice President Mike Pence is dismissing Q Anon as a
conspiracy theory, drawing a line of distinction between
himself and President Donald Trump, who earlier this week
suggested he appreciated supporters of the theory backing
his candidacy. We dismissed conspiracy
authorities around here out of hand, Pence said on Friday on
CNN's New Day, saying he had heard Trump's comments and
subsequently subsequently decrying the media that chases
after shiny, shiny objects. Well, that does not give me a
feeling of butterflies and hopefulness.
You know, Pence has done a couple things that are really
raised my suspicions. Like a couple times, I think a
year or two ago when Trump was talking about NATO not paying
their bills and how, you know, we could pull out of there and
Prince pinch ran right in and said Oh no, no, no.
We got to support NATO. And now, you know, this is his
boss. Why does he even feel the need
to talk about it? And why does he feel the need to
go on CNN of all stations and talk about you can watch CNN for
5 minutes and they blatantly hate Trump.
So why is Pence going on people who are clearly an enemy of the
president and accusing this whole Q Anon thing of being a
conspiracy theory, a shiny object?
We don't believe in this. We don't believe in that.
Why? Why would he care unless maybe
they're getting close to the truth?
It says added on CBS Ask on CBSCBS this morning if he was
inflaming attention on the group by not going on the record to
oppose it pins to cried spending time on a major network to talk
about some conspiracy online theory.
Later adding I don't know anything about Q Anon and I
dismiss it out of hand. Q Anon has ricocheted around the
darker corners of the Internet since late 2017, but it has been
creeping into mainstream politics more and more.
The baseless theory centers on alleged anonymous, high-ranking
government officials. No one is Q Well, of course
you've got some, you know, excellent reporting there from
the AP. You can make up your own mind
about Q. Some of the things I can
appreciate, some of the things I don't know.
The fact is, when the deep state, when these big time
players come out so hard against something where I haven't seen
anything racist or bad come out of their mouth, why do they feel
the need to disassociate themselves or disavow Q Anon?
It's almost like they're just wiping the playing field, clean
the table off, getting ready to set the table where they are in
control of all the information. The last thing in the whole
world that the deep state wants is some jughead inside.
They're passing out little bits and pieces of the truth.
Q and on online. Or even the notion that because
if enough people believe that Q and on is real and I personally
don't even know. But if enough people believe
that they're getting bits and pieces of the truth that could
challenge the deep state narrative to pretty much
anything. And the last thing they want is
a challenge. Now this article here is from
this is a short little snapshot of Louis Elizondo's from
thehistorychannel.com history.com and it says
unidentified inside America's UFO investigation.
Now that's the the show that Louis Elizondo does all right.
And like I said I watched a few of them very interesting.
We talked about some of the subjects here.
They talk about and I think that they are adding value to the
discussion. At the same time, I think that
they could be challenging the narrative of the deep, of the
deep state. And that's why I'm very
interested, based on these tweets that George Knapp has put
out, specifically naming Elizondo, and based on how that
correlates with the tweet put out by theblackvault.com, that
maybe Louie's not being targeted again by the deep state for
character assassination in order to just delegitimatize him,
discredit him. That's what I'm that's what I'm
seeing on the horizon. It says Louis Elizondo.
Louis Lou Elizondo is a former director of the Advanced
Aerospace Threat Identification Program, ATTIP, the secretive
Pentagon unit that studied UF O's as a senior
counterintelligence officer for the Department of Defense.
He operated through Afghanistan, the Middle East, Latin America.
He's trained special. He's He's a trained special
agent who has led countless tactical and strategic missions,
both during wartime and times of peace.
He also conducted sensitive source operations against some
of America's toughest adversaries.
Lou is the team's lead field investigator, continuing in the
civilian world. The work he did inside the
Pentagon's a ATIP program. Now I notice they've got the
acronym for ATIPS built differently here twice.
First, they spell it as ATTIP, and secondly, they've spelled it
as AATIP. Anyway, it's just a short little
word there. And of course there's links to
some of the to some of the shows that he's done.
Now I'm going to look at one last little arc like caught on
time here, I caught before we're out of time.
And because we're talking about this whole ATIP thing, we're
talking about the UFO Investigative Task Force being
shift from the Navy to the Defense Department with the
possibility that in the middle of that shift somehow or before
or after that shift, that UFO evidence was destroyed by the
Navy. That's what seems to be
suggested by the Black Vault tweet with all this transition
going on with all these people. So happy that they're going to
renew this UFO threat investigation.
I think we should. It's encompass and honest.
To take a look at what's going on here.
This is space.com. It says What does the Pentagon's
new UFO task force mean? Experts weigh In by Leonard
David. This is published 4 days ago.
It says and it says. Here's a little perspective on
the much hyped news. If you're a fan of unidentified
flying objects, UF O's, and alien visitation, this is a This
is manna from heaven 3 videos showing U.S.
Navy pilots encountering mysterious, fast moving objects
emerged in 2017 and 2018. The videos were made public due
to reporting by the New York Times and efforts by the To the
Stars Academy, a research, development and Media Center for
cutting edge science and technology.
Well, they left out some important information there.
They left out the fact that those three videos were made
public because they mysteriously ended up out of the hands of the
Navy into the hands of the New York Times.
And instead of the Times publishing them, publishing
those videos themselves, they gave those videos to Louis
Elizondo. So this article is completely
just Pooh poohing the chain of custody.
They're they are ignoring the biggest part of this story other
than the UFO fact. They're ignoring how these UFO
videos got from the cockpit to YouTube and they're really doing
their readers a disservice in my opinion.
Just my humble opinion. It says one of the UAP videos
now. See, now they're calling them
UAP. Now we know that these were
objects because they had radar pings.
So they're using these two acronyms, UAP versus UFO, and
they're switching them around, when in all reality, we're
probably talking about two completely different things.
As we said before in this podcast, objects versus
phenomena, ships versus ghosts. It's kind of, that's kind of the
way I see it. One of the UAP videos was taken
November 2004 and the other two were shot in January of 2015.
All were captured by Navy FA18 Super Hornet jets with pilots
utilizing forward-looking Infrared technology.
That's flare hardware that detects heat and creates images.
The three released UAP videos are called Gimbal Go Fast and
Flare One, also known as Tic Tac.
Last week, the US Department of Defense announced the creation
of a task force to analyze and understand the nature and
origins of UA P's. The Department of the Navy,
under the cognizance of the Office of Under Secretary of
Defense for Intelligence and Security, will lead the
Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force.
Now this is where things get murky.
Now we're being told that the Department of Navy will lead
this under the auspices of the dot, but yet we have the tweet
from theblackvault.com insinuating that the Department
of Navy has destroyed UFO evidence.
It almost seems as if they're going to be using Elizondo as a
distraction because maybe or maybe maybe they did or didn't
destroy evidence, but we know they certainly moved it around
outside the chain of command. The mission of UAPTF is to
detect analyzing catalog UAP's that could potentially pose a
threat to US National Security, DoD officials said.
Any brief statement released on August 14th.
But before you set up greeting science and start tossing out
welcome mats for the incoming aliens, a little perspective and
context or an order, I asked some UFO specialists what they
thought of the newly announced task force.
The formation of a task force on Ufo's is another welcome
development in the recent renewed interest and tension of
these reports by government agencies and political actors,
said Mark Roda Rodegaer, president and scientific
director of the Allenhein Center for UFO Studies in Chicago.
Without further details, it is impossible to judge how well
position the task force will be to seriously investigate,
reports Roy, Geller's added. But I remain cautiously
optimistic for now, Rodiggerer said he understands the need for
secrecy. However, I would hope that as
much information as possible is released to the public so we can
all be informed on this potentially world shattering
subject, he told Insider. He told Outer space.com.
I have no doubt that the military intelligence services
around the world have always been interested in UFO reports,
whether or not a real unexplainable phenomenon is
being is behind a few of them. That's the view of Jim Orgberg,
A noted space journalist destroying any debunker of a
slew of UFO sites. He's admitted lifelong space in
that, blah, blah, blah. We don't really care about him.
And now it says there are many non extraterrestrial reasons why
the Defense Department is interested.
And they go on here and talk about, you know, just some of
the basic nuts and bolts of why the Defense Department would be
interested in UFO's. Look, I think a lot of things
are bringing right now. And there's if you have an
interest in UFO's, it's fun to keep up on this stuff.
And you can really, when you begin to understand who the
players are, when you can begin to understand what the narrative
is, then you start to see these conflicts emerge.
Whether it's between Q Anon supporters and and Trump versus
the deep state, whether it's the military industrial complex
throwing Louis Elizondo under the bus, or whether it's the
news media. Just not.
Not even asking the question of why the Navy gave those three
videos to the New York Times and didn't and didn't go ahead and
publish those through normal means.
When you look at this stuff a little closer, you see that some
of the biggest questions that should be asked aren't being
asked. Like, why was the chain of
custody of this UFO evidence not not followed?
That would tell us. That would tell us a lot that
they would just tell us why did you give these videos and who
gave these videos to the New York Times to pass on to
Elizondo? That question has never been
asked by mainstream media as far as I know.
And now and now after they've used this guy up, it looks as
though they're coming back to try to discredit him even more,
even though throughout this whole thing he's produced a lot
of really good content as far as, you know, furthering the
discussion on Ufo's. So right now we can see this.
Overall, what we see here is a really serious embedded
conflict, and that's between the deep state powers that be and
anybody. Doesn't matter if it's Q Anon,
doesn't matter if it's Louis Elizondo, doesn't matter if it's
President Trump. It's a conflict between this
forces of the deep state and anybody else who wants to
contribute to the narrative of the UFO phenomena that doesn't
exactly agree with what the deep state wants to put out there.
All the stuff is totally fascinating.
Stop by the Twitter account. UFO Warning.
Check out the links. Read through the stuff.
Decide for yourself. Until next time, this is UFO
Warning. Over and out.