Hello and welcome to the program.
You have a warning and this episode were talking about
Jetman pack. Recordings released, that's
correct. Jetman packed recordings
released. You might remember back in July
28th 2021. And then back again on October
15th and October 30th of 2020. There were reports of a man in a
jetpack. Flying over the Los Angeles.
International Airport's, LAX. Right there in the area where
the planes take off and land some very dangerous situation
that we had multiple sightings as I said, and John Greenwald
has been trying to get the recordings from these incidents
for a long time a couple of years.
And anyway I noticed today on his Twitter feed, he posted the
link, he finally got the, it's about a 30-minute 37-minute.
Recording from that incident that occurred on July 28th 2021.
Now that 30 minutes just a couple minutes, we're talking
about the jet man. I want to I want to play that so
you can actually hear it in real time and then we'll go over the
story a little bit because some people may not be aware of it or
may have forgotten it green Walls, written protocol May 2nd
2023 be today and this comes like this site, the black
fault.com. Lots of good stuff over there
would really recommend that you follow John's work.
It says on July 28th. 20 21 and unidentified individual referred
to as Jetpack. Man was cited near Los Angeles
International Airport LAX. The sighting occurred at an
altitude of approximately 5,000 feet with individuals.
Reportedly flying alongside with the individual reportedly flying
alongside commercial planes, air traffic controllers, and Pilots
both reported the unusual incident, which Sparks
significant interest in Concern within the aviation Community.
Now, what you think about this for a minute?
That's 5,000 feet? That's a mile up.
That's really high up for somebody in a jetpack.
If that's what this is supposed to be.
And, secondly, it says that he's flying along with the airplanes.
When you can hear this and this Air Traffic Control
conversation. These guys are flying anywhere
from 180 to 200, 60 mile an hour.
So, it mean, as a pro chime go, a lot faster that when they're,
you know, In transit. But the idea that a person would
be up there, flying alongside one of these airliners.
And another thing as you listen, and I'm not going to play the
whole thing, you can go to John site.
He's got it, he's got a link to the actual flight recording, but
in that recording, the air traffic control lady is is just
routinely constantly warning, people about air turbulence and
wake these. These Jets create a wake behind
them, the same way that a big ship on the link on the water,
would create a wake behind itself.
So they have to even these even these airline pilots have to be
careful not to get too close to the plane in front of them.
Because if they hit that wake, it could cause so much trouble
once that it could endanger the craft.
So if there's enough weight coming off, these things to
endanger another 747, say how could this guy even be You know,
maintain position flying anywhere near one of these
planes. They've got to be putting off so
much air turbulence. So, I don't know whether this
was a human or not, doesn't it seems almost impossible that
someone could do this and it almost seems impossible to me
that somebody that had the resources in the skill to fly.
When he's jetpacks would be stupid enough to take it up in a
takeoff Landing Zone at one of the busiest airports in the
world, it just makes no sense. So anyway, goes on.
This is the Pac-Man was also referred to as Iron Man by air
traffic controllers and some of the pilots authorities,
including the Federal Aviation Administration FAA, and the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI initiated an investigation
to determine the individual and technology used.
Despite extensive searches. The Jetpack Man remains
unidentified and the incident has fueled speculation.
That their speculations and theories regarding Advanced
personal flight Technologies. So here it's been almost, you
know, 23 years since this has happened and once again the FBI
investigates and nothing crickets silence, just like with
the cattle mutilations just like with some of these other things.
Oh yeah, we're looking into that and we don't hear anything about
it. The LAX, sightings of the
Jetpack Man raised questions about the potential risk posed
by such devices to commercial air traffic, as well as a need
for regulation and oversight in the emerging field of personal
flight. Technology.
Yeah, you can imagine. If this if it's this bad.
Now, if you know, for assuming this is a personal jetpack,
imagine what it would be like when everybody has their own
personal drone, frankly, I'm not sure this was a person to me,
this thing is still an unidentified flying object.
Now, I says, note on the foia request, the original.
The original case was filed, August 3rd 2021 for the below
information. There was no foia case.
Number given, And no response received until April for 2023.
So I took him almost two years to get back with Greenwald and
provide the simple 30-minute conversation between the pilots
and air traffic control. It says The Black Vault asked
why the response took so long to get a case number, but nothing
was received back that said, responsive material was mailed
within 2 weeks or after it is unclear why transpired that way.
In other words, they They put him on for two years and then
when he asked them again. Oh yeah.
I guess we'll send him something.
I don't know if this is something clandestine going on
here. Were hiding something or if it's
they just don't care or if it's just incompetence you know, just
unresponsiveness. But this is a serious situation
that's occurred when you have Pilots saying.
Hey, I got somebody in a jetpack flying next to my airplane as
I'm trying to land. You know, this this should have
been investigated and you have to ask why the FBI was not able
to make any progress on this at all.
It just seems it just seems crazy to me.
Now, I'm going to go ahead and play this.
Play this recording for you right now.
That's good 233. Reduce speed to 210.
Catalogs to take 33. How are you?
All right, wing. Read out here.
And do you know what else? You American 650 reduce speed
180 fly heading, 300, advised airport and site called a 180
and Connie 363 heavy traffic, copyright Regional Jet turning
in for the north complex that's a tower 12 0.85 today,
North around 5, last reported Thank you in 1833 last gate 233,
use caution. There was a jet man reported
just north of gate. He was last reported at 5,000.
All right we're looking for the Ironman, laska 233 last good 233
traffic to follow 11:00 and five miles.
Have you Fed Ex at 4500 turn left heading 300 300 that's good
233 follow FedEx caution. Wake turbulence.
Turbulence cleared visual approach.
Runway 25 left there for three 18350.
I left 23:18 SoCal approach speed, 250, or greater, till
advisees caution man and a jetpack was reported just north
of Gaeta 5000 about 10 minutes ago, hurricane, 23 my strength.
I should-- 20-plus out. I've not asked him yet or if you
have 5,000 though I don't really see anything there man in the
jetpack was reported right here about 15 minutes ago now and no
one else reported them. So I think he got scared and
with no you know that 41 fly heading 330 just sending
maintain 4,000. So green Walls did get some
reports back on the couple investigations that have been
done. I'm not going to go through the
whole thing or several pages. Ages.
You can go to the site and look at my but I just found it
interesting some of the correspondence we see back and
forth here, like here's one email message, it's dated it
looks like October 15th 2020. Sus must have been the one that
that the first one had happened. Second one happened, I guess you
were August October and then July of the next year 2021 it
says hi Mike. Here is the initial report of
the latest jetpack sighting by China Airlines inbound to LAX
and my request to air traffic for primary and secondary.
Radar targets to see if we could identify track or location of
the object. Here's an excerpt from are
traffic's responds with a link to the animation file based on
FAA radar data and some clarification provided by air
traffic personnel and the email exchange.
Then he says I pulled the radar data.
I had for this area and did not see any conclusive primary
tracks. The reporting are two aircraft.
CA lo6 was Northeast of LAX at 20 at 20 for the 3z.
I do see a few primary targets but they don't develop into a
track. Attached is a DOT move file made
showing all Targets as see, Alo 06 enters at LAX area, I started
at around 20 377 in an ended it when the craft was touching
down. So he basically is telling you,
we can't find any and then signed John Blanco, he's
basically telling you that they can't find any radar evidence at
least on this one. Happened back on October of
20:28. Not does talk about the FBI.
Interviewing. Some people that have posted
pictures on YouTube, but that just went nowhere.
Here we go. It says Ed spoke with the FBI
this morning. They have not interviewed the
individual who posted the YouTube video, showing a flight
of one-to-one scale. Uas appearing to look like a
human jetpack, the individual lives in Germany and hasn't been
to the United States. Since 2011, they have
interviewed the person who posted the shot, who pushed to
the short six-second video, but that has not led to anything,
okay? Interviews of also been
conducted with all the pilots connected to the reported.
Citing, the only credible report was the first site in the pilot
was shown was the first sighting.
The pilot was showing the one-to-one scale.
Video can stated it looked a lot like what he saw.
The other three events have Pilots reporting to ATC.
They saw a jet pack. But when interviewed by the FBI
that Pilots could not confirm what they saw, isn't that
strange to you? That these Pilots reported
seeing this jetpack? And then when the FBI came
around, they couldn't confirm it almost sounds like a cover-up to
me. Once stated he saw what looked
like a motorcycle in the air and the other two stated it was
something shiny. The latest report.
See a 006 Pilots initially, denied telling ATC, they saw a
jet pack. They insisted it was ATC who
suggested it to them. Isn't that weird.
So was it a jetpack at all? I mean, I've always said, I
thought this thing could have been in the UFO converter
beginning, I listened to us again, this is from this is from
this government investigation that the correspondence that
that the green Walls got back and forth.
It says the latest report CA 06 Pilots initially denied telling
ATC they saw a jet pack they insisted it was ATC who
suggested it to them. Why would they suggest that to
them unless you're trying to cover something up the pilots
recanted their story. Only after the FBI who told them
they listen to their communication with ATC and heard
the pilots a jetpack man or jetpack First.
Once confronted, the pilot stated, they were not sure what
they saw but remembered something about The jetpack
sighting from last month so that is why they reported and agreed
to when questioned by ATC. Oh man, that is was crazy.
It says they went on to say the only saw for two seconds.
It was shiny and possibly about two meters in size about 7 foot.
That sounds okay. I m 3 point 4 inches or three
feet, four inches, so that would be 6 foot 8 inches, that sounds
like a pretty big jet pack man to me and then it got A bunch of
blacked out stuff here. Oh yeah.
They have to protect the privacy of people.
What do you blacking out, guys? A whole is like 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 lines of text blacked out.
This is so sketchy. Okay, then it says, here here's
another one. He's got warning this document
may be law, enforcement sensitive may be designed for
local use only. It may contain information that
may be exempt from public release or Freedom of
Information Act, man, what are they?
Trying to cover up and then it goes on here.
What's it say? This is from Victor.
Good haul, FAA, Thursday, October, 15, 20 22, John Blanco
FAA. So this morning's interoffice
interoffice memos. And so it says Vic I heard there
was another jetpack siding near LAX, rest assured.
I am still in Australia and all our jetpacks are accounted for
and under lock and key and then you have a The rest of sentence
is blacked out and then another blacked-out sentence, okay, if
you have anything, you can share, what always be
interested. No, turbine-powered personal,
VTOL that I know of what had the endurance record required to go
from ground to 6,000 feet. I believe this was the altitudes
of the most recent sighting maneuver and then descend again.
Someone out there is pretty nutty So that's it.
We didn't say it. You saw it your it couldn't be
possible that someone could be in a jetpack doing this.
So someone's pretty nutty. So he's telling you.
This isn't that not even possible to do one jet pack and
you have no men here. Now, this is from the Department
of Transportation to John Green wall.
This is an air traffic organization, Mission Support
Services, blah, blah blah. A search for records was
conducted blah, blah blah. There were no records response
to the portion request and then just basically tell him to pound
sand. Wow.
So what you see here? What I take away from this new.
So this is breaking news and you can go through and look at the
stuff yourself at Greenwald site.
He does. He does probably the most
thorough work of anybody out there.
Okay, I'll just say that. I just told I have total respect
for his work. What you see here is we had
three of these jetpack, sightings back in in August and
October of 2020. And then we had this one July
28th to 2021. Now that's the one that you
heard the the recordings for that we play just a little
snippet. It's from the interaction
between air traffic control and the airline pilots where you
have a pot report seeing this and then you have her warning,
the other Pilots hey there's a bit of Jetpack mancine.
Now remember the recording that plate for you, that's from July
28th. So they've already had two other
sightings at LAX, so this has become a common thing.
So it would be normal for, for Pilots at the second or third
time to say. Yeah, we thought it was a
Jetpack Mac because that's what the verbiage that was being used
and the pilots is so bizarre to me that they had their
interviewed by the FBI and they tell him they sounded like they
just want to get out of this. I didn't want to be labeled as
UFO or so they tell the FBI. Well the airport told us to say
that and the FBI says oh well we've got your recordings with
the F with you know when you were interviewed by the air
traffic control at the airport, FAA, we have those interview
recordings and they didn't tell you to do that.
So It's either ex-fbi set these guys up, you know, and these
guys are like, well no they didn't tell us to do it there
but this was just understood. It was understood before we saw
them because these things have been getting seen, you know, all
over the place LAX. So you see, this is what I see
happening here. As I see, a pilot multiple
Pilots reporting, this UFO and good faith.
Now I don't know if it's Jetpack, Man, it was something
it does. Seven foot tall.
This one is seem like a jet pack man to me, but you can
understand how somebody seeing this might try to fit it into
the reality that they know. And say, oh well, that looks
like a jet pack, man. The other guys, one guy said,
looks like a motorcycle. Another guy said, well, it was
shiny, it was some side of some sort of identified flying
object. A little bigger than a man is
what I would say. But you see how the pilots
report this in good faith. Okay.
Air traffic controller, they react act in good faith and then
you bring in the FAA and he just laughs about it.
Oh, we've got all of our. We've got all of our jet packs
under lock and key. Ha ha.
Somebody must be nutty because a jetpack couldn't possibly go to
6,000 feet, fly around for a half hour and then come back
down to the ground. We all know that.
So it can't be a jetpack, but he doesn't say, well, this is
weird. This is definitely a UFO.
And then, what's the FBI do, man?
These guys, I don't know, they come in.
They talk to the pilots but it sounds to me, like it was a very
aggressive, very nasty confrontation, because the first
thing they say is okay, well you guys said this was jetpack and
the pile of defend trying to defend themselves because they
don't want to be labeled as you know, nutty as if a guy says
they're like, oh well, we saw something.
They told us to say that. What's the FBI do?
Oh, by the way, we've been listening to your phone calls.
We've been listening to your interviews in this.
Interviews station here. They didn't tell you to say
that. Well, they didn't tell him to
say that in that particular interview, but that had been
implied before that. So these Pilots, why would they
ever wonder? Why would the ever want to
report a UFO? If they do, what are they have
to deal with? They have to deal with a FAA
that labels them as nutty or they have to deal with the FBI
that comes in and starts aggressively grilling them like
there's some sort of criminal. Why would you put yourself in a
situation if I was a I don't saw a UFO, I wouldn't tell anybody.
I might tell somebody anonymously.
But why would you want to jeopardize?
Maybe not on your job but your freedom, this is nuts.
So that's what I'm getting from between the lines here is how we
treat experiencers. How we treat people, who see
these things. A simple eyewitness is D, person
by the FAA and verbally attacked by the FBI.
This is not how we should be treating.
These people, these are expert Witnesses.
They should be talking to him. Making him feel comfortable.
They should just take down the words that they say.
They should get the whole story. They shouldn't cut them off and
say, oh, we've already listened to your conversation now, you're
lying to me, accusing them a lying You know, imagine yourself
in that interview room with an f.b.i. with multiple FBI agents
and to have them say, oh, you just lied to me.
Well, you know, it's a federal crime, right?
You can go to prison for five years for that for lying to an
agent. Knowing that.
Why would you ever talk to one of these guys?
I find the situation a little distressing.
How we treat these Witnesses, these expert Witnesses, how
they're marginalized and attacked by our own government.
It took two years for green wall to get this stuff.
It was very telling, although there were segments that were
blacked out that I suspect were probably even more interesting
than what we're able to read. Right there.
But just from those couple of Snippets those, those reports
between these people you What's going on?
Okay, I'm not seeing these investigators as Heroes.
I'm seeing these investigators to someone who are trying to
marginalize the person and threaten the that the witnesses
and sweep. This whole thing under the rug,
are they getting this orders from up above?
Is that what's going on here? Why do we have this conspiracy
to cover up? Clearly, that's what it is.
That's your disclosure right there.
This conspiracy to cover up. Who are they, who are they in
cahoots with? And who are they covering for
anyway, stop by the blackbaud.com.
This site is, is incredible. Really cool stuff.
Until next time, this is UFO morning over and out.
That's your disclosure right there.
This conspiracy to cover up. Who are they, who are they in
cahoots with? And who are they covering for
anyway, stop by the blackbaud.com.
This site is, is incredible. Really cool stuff.
Until next time, this is UFO morning over and out.