Hello, and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're talking about Gary Nolan in the otacoma
skeleton. That's correct, Gary Nolan in
the otacoma skeleton. Now, of course, many of you
probably know that this skeleton consists of this tiny little
fennel fetal skeleton. There was a debate about whether
this thing was an alien human hybrid or whether this was just
some sort of deformed premature human that had passed away,
found there in the Atacama Desert in Peru.
A lot of controversy around it, for one thing.
Should people even be down there digging up graves of these folks
and then carting the remains around the countryside trying to
pass them off as aliens? Or was this actually an alien
that needed to be analyzed? We could find out the real
history of this thing. Gary Nolan talks about how he
heard about this case and volunteer to services all this
super expensive equipment and this brain trust makes you
wonder why the guy would even bother.
I mean, you have so much more to risk than what it's worth.
You're talking about using millions of dollars worth of
equipment in the time of these highly paid scientists to
determine whether or not this out of common skeleton was
actually human or some sort of variant.
Some people think maybe the thing was alien and Nolan was
just, you know, put in that position by the government, deep
state, whoever to quash the discussion of this thing because
of me getting a lot of attention.
Other people think that, you know, he did a big service to
the community by explaining what this thing was to all of the
masses out there and some people aren't so sure.
Some people think that what Gary Nolan did could have been
unethical, considering that this thing had been spirited away
from this graveyard and really hadn't been there but more than
a few decades. It sounds like now if you just
look at it from normal standpoint, he gets to hear a
treatment from his his college there.
Stanford. They have an article
stanford.edu. I'll have the links over the
Kofi site. It says Mysterious skeleton
Shows Molecular Complexity of Bone disease The strange
skeletal remains of a fetus discovered in Chile have turned
up new insights into the genetics of some bone diseases,
according to a new study from researchers at Stanford and
UCSF. And this is dated March 22nd,
2018 behind a Armitage. And they're kind of Tooting
their own horn here a little bit.
Not only did we tell you that this thing wasn't an alien, but
we've found new insights in into the genetics of some bone
diseases. Now we'll find out later that
other scientists disagree with this All together.
It says a bizarre human skeleton wants rumored to have
extraterrestrial origins. Has gotten a rather
comprehensive genomic work up the results of which are now in
researchers from the Stanford University School of Medicine
report. Now think about the verbiage
there bizarre human skeleton Is that something that we really
want to refer to a person with a disability is bizarre?
I mean, aren't we past that? But here at this university, I
think it's supposed to be one of the, you know, like all these
universities, aren't they supposed to be super attentive
and and super aware of of all the right terminology to use
certain words you can use, certain words you can't use.
Shouldn't they know better, even in 2018, not to refer to the
remains of a disabled infant as bizarre if it's if it's if it's
human, and it's, it's. And it has these, what we call
deformities, these genetic mutations doesn't mean it's
bizarre, It just means it's different.
It says the findings stamp out any remaining questions about
the specimen's home planet. It's without a doubt human.
But more than that, the analysis answers questions about remains
that have long been a genetic enigma.
I have a problem with this first two paragraphs.
They tell you that they know that this little deceased fetus,
if you want to call it three month old human, is human, but
yet they refer to it as bizarre. That shows a total disrespect
for human life, in my opinion. After five years of deep genomic
analysis, Gary Nolan, PhD, professor of microbiology and
immunology at Stanford and at MD, PhD, director of the
Institute for Computational Health Sciences, and the
University of California, San Francisco, have pinpointed the
mutations responsible for the anomalous specimen.
The researchers found mutations and not one but several genes
known to govern bone development.
What's more, some of these molecular oddities have never
been described before, so they spent five years on this.
All that money, all the time of these rich, highly educated men.
What was the point? To me, it seems that when
doctors perform analysis for patients and their families were
often searching for one cause, one super rare or unusual
mutation that can explain the child's ailment.
But in this case, we were pretty confident that multiple things
went wrong, said Butte. It's indicate.
It's an indication, he said, that looking for a single
mutation, or even mutations that are already known to cause a
particular disease, can discourage researchers from
looking for other potential innate causes and in turn,
potential treatment for patients.
Now that's just common sense. They didn't discover anything
there. Most of us know that if your
health is going downhill, it's going downhill in buckets.
Hardly ever do we have just one thing go wrong.
That's because your body operates as an entire Organism
and when it's attacked, the entire Organism is affected.
So the idea, and that's what's such, I think, such a stupid
idea with this whole gene therapy thing where you're going
to fix, it's like a it's like a Jingle blocks.
You're going to fix one thing, but what happens when you pull
this block out or put this block in the whole rest of The thing
is affected. It's just the idea that these
guys, it gives you, it gives you some insight into their
psychology. They think that they're so smart
and they're so intelligent that in order to fix the human
condition, they only have to identify one thing.
And they're the bright boys. They're going to, they're going
to find out one thing and they're going to fix it.
I hate to tell you about life is way more complicated than that.
Life is infinite. They're applying Newtonian
physics where really what you need is quantum physics because
the human Organism is so complex, but yet they've got
this little deceased fetus, infant, whatever you want to
call it, there from Peru that's been taken out of the country
apparently without permission. And they're going to run these
tests on it, and they're going to tell you how smart they are,
because after five years, they figured out that more than one
thing was wrong with it. Well, good for them.
Nolan, who holds the Rafford and Carleta Harris professorship,
and Butte, a former Stanford faculty member who now holds her
Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg Distinguished
professorship at US at UCSF, are senior authors of the study,
which was published online March 22nd in Genome Research.
Sanachita Bacharia, A bio for Maddox Research at UCSF, is the
lead author. Now the article goes on here.
It says the skeleton, nicknamed Ada, was discovered more than a
decade ago in an abandoned town in the Atacama Desert of Chile.
After trading hands and eventually finding a permanent
home in Spain, the mummified specimen started to garner
public attention. Standing just six inches tall
and about the length of a dollar bill with an angular, elongated
skull and sunken, slanted eye sockets, the Internet began to
bubble with otherworldly hullabaloo and talk of ET.
Now, I want you to notice how this author has totally
disrespected the humanity of this little creature.
First off, they give it a nickname, Ada.
Well, isn't that cute? We found human remains from, I
don't know, maybe 30 years ago. Let's go ahead and give it a
nickname. How would people in the United
States feel if somebody came into a rural cemetery somewhere?
Maybe the town had disappeared and excavated and found the
human remains of a of a stillborn baby, and then took
those things and sold them multiple times and eventually
they were put on display for the world to see and for Doctor
Nolan to join his test on. I dare see think that people in
this country where I live at, in the United States, would have
been very angry about that. But yet this sort of thing is
happening in other countries and it seems to be just OK.
And Stanford, at least in 2018 here, seems incapable of
understanding that There's a lot of ethical boundaries here that
have been pushed. And it seems to me, on the face
of it, that human dignity that's deserved by this little infant,
whatever it is, has not been afforded to it as it should have
been. Now they go on here, they say, I
had heard about this specimen through a friend of mine, and I
managed to get a picture of it. Nolan said you can't look at
this specimen and not think it's interesting.
It's quite dramatic. So I told my friend, look,
whatever it is, if it's got DNA, I can do the analysis.
No question about chain of custody.
No question about where did this thing come from.
No recognition of the fact that we all look different as we are
developing in our mother's womb than we do when we're a year or
two old. I don't hear him saying, Are
there some kind of rules that I should follow here concerning
that this is human remains in this country?
Somebody might be charged criminally with handling remains
the way that these remains were handled, changing hands multiple
times between grave robbers and and bone buyers, only to end up
in a laboratory of a multi $1,000,000, scientists and his
team and their fancy equipment. Terrible, it says.
With the help of Ralph Lachman, MD, Clinic Professor of
Radiology at Stanford and an expert in a type of pediatric
bone disease, Nolan set the record straight.
Their analysis pointed to a decisive conclusion.
This was the skeleton of a human female, likely a fetus, that had
suffered severe genetic mutations.
In addition, Nolan saw that Adda, most likely a fetus, had
the bone composition of a six year old and indication that she
had a rare bone aging disorder. To understand the genetic
underpinnings of Ada's physicality, Nolan turned to
Butte for help and genomic evaluation.
He accepted the challenge, running a work up so
comprehensive it nearly rose to the level of patient care.
Of course, the patient was dead. Boot noted that some people
might wonder about the point of such in depth analysis.
We thought this would be an interesting exercise in applying
the tools that we have today to really see what we could find,
he said. The phenotype, the symptoms and
size of this girl were extremely unusual, and analyzing these
kinds of really puzzling old samples teaches us better.
How to analyze the DNA of kids today under current conditions?
Well, the fact is, I don't think that the sample is that old.
It says. To understand the genetics
drivers at play, Boot and Nolan extracted a small DNA sample
from Adda's ribs and sequence the entire genome.
The skeleton is approximately 40 years old, 40 years old, so
they're digging up modern burial zones.
So its DNA is modern and still relatively intact.
Moreover, data collected from the whole genome sequencing
showed that as monocular composition aligned with that of
a human genome, Nolan noted that 8% of the DNA was unmatchable
with human DNA, but that was due to a degraded sample, not
extraterrestrial biology. Later, a more sophisticated
analysis was able to match up to 98% of the DNA, according to
Nolan. Well, I mean, hard to say.
This thing's been passed around and passed around and passed
around for years before it got into Nolan's lab.
Like I said, it's it amazes me that he's not more concerned
about the actual provenance of this stuff.
The point is I want you to take from this first article is that
this is how the elite treat us. It's not just the deep state.
All these folks at these big high-powered universities with
their billions of dollars worth of endowments, with their
stratified air of intellect, they come across this tiny
little sculpt remains of a premature death in a baby.
And what do they do? They don't ask ethical questions
about well, how do we treat a human?
This child's only been dead for 40 years.
Where did it come from? Who dug it up out of its grave?
No, they can't wait to get their hands on it.
They can't wait to spend five years studying it.
They can't wait to apply all of this multi man dollar equipment
and brain trust to this little problem.
Are they that bored? Are they covering something up?
Do they have that much disrespect for their fellow man
when their fellow man happens to be born?
Their fellow, I should say girl, happens to be born in a country
that's maybe 1000 miles South of us.
Would they have, would they have exhibited the same zeal if this
little mummified infant had come from our own country?
There's real ethical questions that need to be asked here.
Now. Gary Nolan has time to block me
from Twitter, I presume because I made a few jokes about Louis
Elizondo. We go on here at this next
article. This is from iflscience.com.
It's also written, I believe, back in 2018 or shortly after
that. It says Why is the otakama
skeleton so controversial? She's definitely not an alien.
Written by Tom Hale, senior journalist, it says the Atacama
skeleton continues to stir controversy and confusion.
Discovered in Chile's Atacama Desert back in 2003, the 15
centimeter, 6 inch long mummified skeleton features an
unusually long skull, giant sockets, and only has 20 ribs
instead of 24. You can kind of see what's going
on here with the bone trade. These guys probably locals are
going down there, they're digging up these skeletons.
They're really looking for the older, elongated heads.
There's an interest in that sort of thing, and people pay money
for them, I suppose. But I guess maybe they've dug up
so many of now they're resorting to go to the to the more recent
cemeteries, and then they're trading these things around from
from one bone trader to the next.
I mean, could you imagine your loved one having their bones
traded back and forth between these, between these guys trying
to make a buck off them? So it looks like I took from
2003 to 2018 to make it to Nolan's lab.
Long trip from the graveyard to Nolan's lab.
It says the skeleton gained the nickname Ada.
When the images hit the Internet.
Many people jump to jump to the conclusion this was the body of
an extraterrestrial alien. A 2013 documentary called Cyrus
claimed the skeleton belonged to a 1000 year old being.
That was evidence of contact between aliens and ancient
civilizations. However, in 2018, genetic
analysis of Ada's bones quashed these rumors by establishing the
skeleton was a premature human fetus.
In fact, there were a female of South of South American descent.
An exact age couldn't be pinned down, but the researchers of
their study showed the mummy was 500 years old or less.
Now we just we just read there in this last article that
Nolan's team determined that they were around 40 years old.
On top of this, it was found that their DNA contained 7 genes
associated with bone and facial malformation, premature joint
fusion and dwarfism. The mutations linked to dwarfism
in a rare bone aging disorder likely explained this the
skeletons unusual appearance. The study has proved
controversial. However, in a rebuttal to the
genetic analysis, another team of scientists claim that the
genetic probably has little to do with Otta's appearance, and
instead the elongated skull was a result of a complication
during pregnancy or birth, or as a result of the mummification
process. They also argued that the
genetic analysis was riddled with ethical issues, stating
there was no scientific rationale to disturb the
remains. So while Gary Nolan is going
around bragging about how he got into UFOs through this Atacama
mummy, some people are saying, some scientists are saying that
the genetic analysis was riddled with ethic ethical issues
stating there was no scientific rationale to disturb the
remains. Yeah, in this country you're not
allowed to randomly go out and dig up the remains of people to
run studies on them. How would you appreciate it if
someone, some some so-called scientist, was, was purchasing
or coming into a position of of your relative's remains so they
could just randomly do DNA studies on them?
Not right. Unfortunately, there was no
scientific rationale to undertake genomic analysis of
ADA because a skeleton is normal.
The identified genetic mutations are possibly coincidental, and
none of the genetic mutations are known to be strongly
associated with skeletal pathology that would affect the
skeleton at this young age, commented Associate Professor
Sia Halcrow, a bio archaeologist at the University of Otago.
Think about that, They give you this whole paper.
Oh, we've been working on this for five years and we found all
this genetic stuff that's wrong with this skeleton and this
happened and that happened, and they really give you the
business about it and tell you how smart they are and how much
they've done. This person comes along and
says, no, not really. Looks like a normal skeleton to
me. Got to consider, it's premature.
Got to consider. Could have been affected this
way because of the mummification process, because of the way it
was still birthed. No, nothing to see here.
Just five years of wasting time and money.
It goes on and says how was the Atacama skeleton discovered?
The story of the Atacama skeleton's discovery is hazy and
explains why studying the mummy is such a contentious issue.
We get back to this whole thing about chain of custody, just
like with all these videos that Corbel and sometimes Napa bring
them forward and a lot of other people.
Louis, Elizondo, Christopher Mellon, something passed off to
somebody somewhere in a parking lot.
Now, it's one thing to do that with a video, but it's quite
another to do that with human remains.
And that's what's happened here. If we're going to be taken
seriously in the UFO community, we should demand that in
situations like this that ethical standards are met.
It's not OK to go down to another country.
I don't care how poor the folks in that country are.
I don't care what their language is.
I don't care what their religion is.
It's not OK to go down there to plunder their graves, to sell
the bones that you find in those graves, to bring them back here
15 years later and have a multi millionaire scientist and his
crew spend five years having a good long look at him to tell us
that they're not alien. This has to be one of those
things where we just say put it back, it's not yours, it's a
mystery. It goes unsolved.
We don't have the right to plunder grain to plunder these
graves, especially recent graves. 40 years old, for crying
out loud, the story goes it was discovered by a treasure hunter
called Oscar Munez in 2003, next to an abandoned church in a
ghost town called Lenoria. He claimed it was found wrapped
in a white cloth inside a leather pouch.
A treasure hunter or a bone hunter?
That's what I would like to know well.
How many treasures did he expect to find next to a church?
I would expect to find a graveyard next to a church in a
place like this. Years later, Adda ended up in a
private collection of Barcelona. According to the New York Times,
how do you import these human remains without without
violating some kind of a law? I mean, you can't even take
fruit in and out of these places.
The Chilean National Monuments Council alleged that the remains
were illegally exhumed in 2003 and smuggled out of the country.
So you have to take your shoes off at the airport and walk
across a filthy mat in order, barefoot or sock foot, in order
to get on an airplane because who knows, you might have a bomb
in your shoe. Meanwhile, people are smuggling
in human remains. Just think about, just think
about the level of stupidity that we're faced with every
single day in light of the dubious back story of ADA.
Dubious. I don't think there's anything
dubious about it. I think what we had was, I think
we had a Bone hunter. Find these things, sell them
multiple times to some collector, if you want to call
them that, And Spain. Somehow it ended up back
stateside and I can't remember the guy who was who was parading
the stuff around. He's passed away from cancer a
few years ago. I don't think that.
I don't think the question ever entered his mind that this thing
was human. I think he really thought it
wasn't have an alien. Anyway, no one ends up with it
at a lab at Stanford, California, one of the most woke
places on earth. Aren't they supposed to be so
sensitive to everything? Even 2018?
I mean, there's so many decades ahead of us.
Wasn't someone able to say in that university, hey, where did
these human remains come from? Don't you think we should put
them back? What about the family?
But they didn't care. It was just it was just like it
was just like dogs on the hunt. They had the scent of blood,
they were after it, it says. In light of the dubious back
story of Adam, many scientists question whether the genetic
studies of the skeleton were ethically sound, not least
because the skeleton may have been obtained illegally.
Well, if it wasn't obtained illegally, show me the
paperwork. That's how that works.
OK. If it was not obtained
illegally, show me the paperwork.
If you don't have the paperwork which shows the chain of
custody, then I have to assume that it's illegal.
You don't drive your car around the street on the highway from
state to state without a driver's license.
A registration and hopefully a title that you or the bank have.
There is a chain of custody as to who bought that car, who owns
it and who has the right to drive it.
And saying you're a sovereign citizen is not going to cut it.
And Gary Nolan saying he's a sovereign scientist is not going
to cut it. Goes on.
It says there is a very similar mummified human fetus known as
Aloshenka that was discovered in Russia in 1996.
However, for the Americas, Otta is unique.
That being said, the Atacama Desert is home to a number of
mummified human remains. The Atacama Desert is an
achingly arid, skinny strip of desert on the West Coast of
South America. That's the driest non polar
desert in the world. Conditions are so harsh in this
rocky landscape that scientists have used the area to simulate
missions to Mars. Human remains that are buried
there will naturally to be mummified due to the intense
heat and lack of moisture. It is also known, however, that
the ancient Chinatura culture had a tradition of intentionally
mummifying bodies in the Atacama Desert to venerate their dead
bodies were mummified through a variety of complex embalming
procedures. 1 Technique involved extracting the brains and
organs, then stuffing the body with fiber and filling the skull
with straw or ash before sewing the body back together with
reeds. Finally, the mummy was caked
with a thick muddy paste. And hard as it is to imagine,
there are people that are interested in collecting those
mummies, buying them from bone buyers.
And then sometimes these furry bones end up in places like the
lab at Stanford where famous scientists can go on television
or do interviews or go to conferences and talk about how
they did this fabulous DNA test, a test that other scientists are
calling a waste of money and a breach of ethics.
So that's why I'm really asking why did Doctor Gary Nolan even
bother with this little unborn fetus from the Atacama desert?
Until next time, this is UFO Warning.
Over and out.