Hello, and welcome to the program.
You have a warning, today's episode were looking at UFOs and
casandra's curse, that's correct.
UFOs. And Cassandra, skirts of this
article comes to us from the hill.com written by Marie Van
Rim, cough, dated October 17th 2022.
The title says UFOs and pelicans and Cassandra's curse.
And then it says In Greek mythology, Cassandra is endowed
with the gift of Prophecy but Cassandra is also cursed.
Her prophecies are never to be believed as former White House.
Counter-terrorism Zara, Richard Clarke rights in warnings
finding kassandra's who stopped a trapeze.
The modern-day kassandra's expert, who's who Sound the
Alarm over catastrophic or paradigm-shifting events are
often ignored I'll go beyond that often times the people that
sound these oncoming disasters are called conspiracy.
Theorists are called crazy Kooks, whatever.
Clerk who served in the Reagan Clinton and both Bush
administration's is also is all too familiar with this
phenomenon. Like the engineer who foresaw
the space shuttle Challenger catastrophe.
The loan intelligence analyst, who warned of Iraq's, invasion,
of Kuwait, the Louisiana State University Professor, who issued
a dire predictions years before. Important that Trina and The
Outsiders who foresaw the 2008 financial collapse for its
desperate warnings of an impending terrorist attack fell
on deaf ears before September 11th 2001.
Now, if we look at each of these major events that talks about
from the space shuttle to 2008 financial collapse to even to
911 there's there were patterns there that if a person applied
reason and logic, if they want to, what if applied quantitative
thinking it was easy to see, what the end result was going to
be, if you lend millions of people money who are working
minimum-wage jobs, but if you're letting them variable loan
interest rates for houses and then you let them buy multiple
houses, there's a pretty good chance that when the rates go
up, Up there not going to be able to make those house
payments. Anybody applying quantitative
reasoning could have seen that But if you apply full of pain of
reasoning with statements like well I just believe well I think
well I'm the science then you could have missed the fact that
led up to those really big bad explosions as in the financial
crisis. So what he's talking about here
are the people that sometimes the most reasonable, the most
logical the most clear thinking are the ones that are considered
the out. Outsiders the conspiracy
theorist writing in 2017. Clark is Christine about the
risk of a global infectious disease.
Outbreak shortly. After warnings, was published a
stunning expose of US. Government efforts to
investigate unidentified flying objects appeared in the New York
Times and accompanying article. Paints a vivid portrait of an
extraordinary, multi witness UFO encounter off the coast of
Southern California, a follow-on peace describes Naval, L
frequent observations, operated by multiple sensors of unknown
objects, exhibiting seemingly highly advanced technology.
Now, I just blood isolate. These two paragraphs first,
thought he just, he just brushes over this 2017 prediction of an
upcoming Global infectious disease outbreak.
This was not hard to see when you consider all the travel that
we have in this, you know, everybody going to and fro
across the planet and secondly, If you stopped to consider all
the hundreds of Laboratories around the world, some call them
weapon lab, some call them experimental scientific Labs,
that are fooling around with highly contagious, contagious
variance, just fridge. This last week, it was revealed
that a lab in Boston had created a particular virus that had an
80% mortality rate. These are not good things for
people to be missing, but if you consider these sorts of weapons
being developed and you learn that on top of all, the human
mistakes that can be made, it's not hard to understand that
something really bad could happen.
Just like, with these UFOs, that we see if we're seeing all these
hundreds of UFO, sightings we don't know where they're coming
from. Whether they're firm,
off-planet, whether they're from another, Dimension.
Whether there are some secret deep, deep thick, double,
whatever they are. There's so much that we don't
know about them. But that if you just approach
this quantitatively reasonably, you would have to say out of all
the possible things, these could be there has to be a number of
those things that they could be. That's bad.
It can't all be good. We can't just assume that every
single UFO that we come in contact or C is here to save the
world. Now the Goes on and says more
recent Revelations. Make clear that fighter pilots
are often left. Stunned by the UFOs, critically
officials a pie confidence that secret US.
Aircraft were experimental Technologies are not responsible
for these perplexing encounters at the same time.
Analysts have no evidence that a foreign power is behind hundreds
of UFO reports. I think it's safe to say when we
think about what's going on in the Ukraine right now with
Russia. When we think about how unhappy
China is with Taiwan, if those two Powers had these kinds of
vehicles at their disposal, wouldn't you think that they
would have employed them already?
It says at this point any intelligence analyst worth its
salt should Sound the Alarm about the UFO phenomenon and if
policymakers are, in fact, receiving such warnings is
Sanders curse appears to be alive and well, well when people
do When people do one about these, you have those when
people say, hey, I've been abducted in this happened, to
me, that was so - when people call up the local law
enforcement and their cattle of the mutilated.
When we have unexplained abductions, those people are
called conspiracy theorist, their Cassandra, the warning,
but their warnings are being ignored this Clark rights in
warnings agenda, inertia, when too many issues compete for
attention, is one of many factors that keep the Seas.
Asia makers, from acting on dire warnings, from experts.
Air Force, Security, Frank, Kendall demonstrate this
phenomenon recently saying that he does not focus on UFOs
because there are a lot of known threats out there that are
working very hard to protect that we're working.
Very hard to protect the u.s. against.
I don't like the focus on those secondary candidate, fiddle.
Did also say I think we should take the UFO phenomena seriously
both were real technical investigations of what they are.
Okay, this is classic classic case of qualitative making.
This is a kind of thinking that ends up with the space shuttle
disaster or a 2008 financial crisis or God forbid and 9/11
National tragedy. It's qualitative thinking I look
at how he answers. He says Air Force, secretary
Kendall demonstrated this phenomenon Slide saying that he
does not focus on UFOs because there are a lot of known threats
that he takes a general thing that we can all agree on.
There are a lot of known threats, that's not necessarily
quantitative, that's just something that we all agree on.
He doesn't say, well, there's 969 known threats.
He just says there's a lot that were working very hard on
another qualitative. I don't know, how do we know
they're working hard to protect the u.s.?
I mean, I could argue against that considering the Our own
situation that happened a couple years ago in Colorado,
considering that how many of these UFO sightings are just
ignored. And he says, I'd like to focus
on those III that's qualitative not.
What's good for the country? Not a decision that he's made
after extensive consultation running the numbers on a
supercomputer. No, it's what he would like to
do. Just like when the ship just
like when the shuttle was blown up, not, you know, those
Engineers came to this management team or whoever it
was and said, don't don't don't launch that thing tomorrow.
It's going to be too cold. The seals are going to shrink
up, and there could be a catastrophic explosion.
They're there, their opinion seems to have been.
We're going to go ahead and launch, is we have a schedule to
keep see the difference quantitative qualitative, I
think we should take the UFO phenomenon.
Seriously, well, there's your little.
Where's your little crumbs on the floor for you and call for
real technical investigation of what they are?
Well, let's see, the technical investigation.
Let's let's let's have some transparency here, at least tell
us where the reports are coming in and what, We're saying.
Beyond agenda. Inertia secretary Clinton's
comments highlight the core challenge posed by the UFO
conundrum. Congress is demanding that the
Department of Defense and the intelligence Community entities
laser focused on National Security threats of conduct a
sweeping thorough investigation of UFOs but in a world teeming
with threats defense and intelligence agencies will
always Focus limited resources on.
Well, defined risk as Kendall notes UFOs, do not fall into
this category. It's another qualitative
statement. He doesn't know that they have
even measured UFOs. Enough to know anything about
them, they could start with transparency and then people
could crowdsource the truth on this topic.
As they say, this Mitch, this mismatch between organizational,
priorities, mitigating threats, and the nature of the UFO
phenomenon. No, unambiguous threat, likely
lies at the root of Congress. Has powerful frustration and
disappointment with the government slow progress on
resolving. UFO problem.
I think I have to interject here.
I think part of the frustration with Congress is the fact that
when information does come in that it's not being shared with
Congress, we see this constantly with the defense department
setting up these, what, what amount of shell companies, these
private corporations to investigate the UFO phenomenon
to investigate UFO metamaterial? They, it seems quite likely that
UFO craft material or substances Left Behind after a UFO
encounter, or Landing have been recovered.
And those substances have been secured away somewhere in a
private companies laboratory where the American public and
Congress has no access to them. I think that's where the real
frustration comes in is that Congress is being kept out of
the loop and to make matters, worse Congress sees the defense
department as somebody who's not Really competent enough to deal
with the questions of UFOs. That thoroughly.
They are approaching the problem.
Qualitatively not quantitatively want to give they're not using
enough Common Sense, NASA and organized asset and organized
focused on science. The sentence structure, their
little bit NASA, an organization focused on science rather than
threats is proceeding full force on unprecedented study of UFOs.
You know, I do trust NASA either your spent too many accusations
of them, photoshopping pictures. They had UFOs in them, NASA has
42 secretive. In my opinion, to be to be to be
the one that we trust for for giving disclosure on UFOs.
Of course, many other factors cost policy makers to resist
acting on wings of living disaster or paradigm-shifting
event, according to Clarke initial current syndrome When a
phenomenon has never occurred previously frequently inhibits
timely and appropriate response to warnings.
At the same time, complexity mismatch can paralyze
decision-makers who lack the expertise to understand key
pieces of data. Such as the extraordinary
Technologies needed to execute Anonymous flight.
Characteristics policymakers can also resist acting on warnings,
no matter how. Convincing if they are based on
incomplete data. Well, you first.
If you have to start measuring to get any kind of data at all,
and the most important data here is, is the eyewitness accounts.
That's the most common data. And then after that, if if we do
have made a material from some of these crashed UFOs, then that
needs to be shared with, with the government ages that
agencies that are responsible for investigating it, more of
her Spark Notes. Decision-makers don't typically,
welcome predictions of impending.
Disaster while UFOs may not represent inevitable
catastrophe, they are a perplexing.
Unknown. Woe to the analyst, who presents
policymakers with evidence of a compelling yet, entirely unknown
phenomena. That may or may not pose a grave
threat. Such ambiguity is anathema to
rigid bureaucratic structures missions in mindsets.
You see a trying to pound a square peg into a round hole?
Cassandra's curse, strikes even more forcefully.
If the analyst sounding the alarm on UFOs cannot offer,
decision-makers concrete recommendations to address this
mysterious phenomenon policymakers after all are
answerable to high-ranking policymakers.
Who expect options for navigating in particular a
particular issue at the same time at unique cognitive trap
can impede objective analysis or action on UFOs.
If decision makers believe that a technology risk or threat,
Simply cannot exist that all data indicating otherwise is
ignored trivialised or explained away.
You know, that just gives me a mental image of that.
Type of the Titanic. Headed directly toward that,
giant Iceberg, and the caption saying full steam ahead, Clark
alludes. To this quote, it can't be.
So it isn't phenomenon, writing that policymakers presented with
compelling evidence of an impending catastrophe.
Often go into an A+. Asset state of denial, they may
not dispute the evidence and reject the warning, but they
don't act as though, they actually believed it to be true.
Well that's a fact. And you know, just like with the
space shuttle, the Management's presented with a set of facts
that tells them that it's far too dangerous to launch that
rocket but they go ahead and do it anyway.
Part of it might be because they're not the ones sitting on
top of the rocket. Okay.
Just like with these Labs that we have across the country.
Probably not just the US where they're fooling around with its
gain-of-function, taking taking viruses and turning them into
into potential. Killer plagues.
A lot of fun for them. They can kill a out, they can
kill eight out of ten, raspy find out, but maybe they somehow
think that they're immune to it. I don't know.
It's as if logic has been suspended Captain Edward Rupal
the first director of Project Blue Book.
The US Air Force's decade-long investigation of UFOs brought
that scientists and experts. Who embrace the, it can't be
approached to oppose our dangerous.
If for no other reason than history has proved themselves is
Rupert notes, the French Academy of Science once Muhammad, Ali
denied that stones are meteorites, could fall from the
sky at the same time world famous astronomer dr.
Simon Newcomb. Claim that flight without
balloons is impossible. Without the discovery of some
new material or a new force of nature.
Summerlee the chief engineer of the u.s.
Navy playing the any attempts to fly heavier than air vehicles.
Was observed for his part President.
Truman's Chief of Staff. Told his boss that the atomic
bomb is the biggest fool thing we have ever done.
It will never go off and I speak as an expert in explosives with
noteworthy contemporary parallels rubles masterful
description of the complexities of warning pot.
Government officials about UFOs makes his book.
The must-read importantly how are Over.
Not all Cassandra sounding. The alarm on the UFO, phenomena
are government intelligence analyst with high-level security
clearances as Clark rights and warnings to Saunders offense
dishonors, often seek out interpret data that others,
Overlook collect facts. That no one else bothered his
symbol or derive new insights from data others already have to
that in a small group of private citizens.
As examine in excruciating detail, three government, UFO
videos At a company, the New York Times 2017, expose these
individuals now hold the gold standard of analysis.
Reproducible verifiable data sophisticated mathematical
modeling for example. However, rates eyewitness
accounts of well-documented of a well-documented 2015, UFO
encounter. This is robust evidence that an
unknown object demonstrated anomalous flight
characteristics. Only achievable with highly
advanced technology for its part, the government Confident
that the object involved in the incident is not a US aircraft,
nor do intelligence analysts have evidence that he belonged
to a foreign power grappling with the data and critically,
the broader content context surrounding the event should
turn any objective analyst private citizen and government
employee alike into a modern-day Cassandra.
Well, that's that's quite a bit of food for thought, you know,
and speaking of these Navy videos, if you watch those
things, how Fast. They move.
I can't say with 100% certainty because we know that we haven't
got the best pictures of these. But these objects almost border
on the Globes are the orbs that we that we reported so often.
And the fact that they're moving so fast, you know, thousands of
miles per hour and then they can stop and turn on a dime.
The way they're doing things that just couldn't be done with
a physical object. To me demonstrates that there
are some sort of inner dimensional object.
And when you start to think about something being
interdimensional and that our own physics, don't apply.
That tells you right there that whatever these things are there
their technology and their understanding of how the
universe works is Light Years beyond what we know and for that
reason alone I think we need to have a few more kassandra's
warning about a potential that these UFOs might present.
Until next time, this is UFO warning over and out.