Hello and welcome to the program UFO warning, today's topic comes
from the black vault.com Oracle came out on December, 6th
titled, the Pentagon, correct record on secret UFO program.
This is back on the topic of a tip aatip by John Greenwald and
he says, the Pentagon has recently opened up to the black
folks about the rumored secret UFO program known as the
advanced Aerospace threat. Identification program or a a a
t. I p on December 16th, 2017.
News of this obscure program was first announced by the New York
Times and Politico, both media Outlets reported that UFO Now,
being referred to as unidentified aerial phenomena,
ruaps to reduce the stigma surrounding the topic with a
direct focus of this program. However, the Pentagon now seems
to have changed their stance. Claiming they want to correct
the record and clear up some inaccuracies depending on.
Now says, aatip was not a UFO or UAP program and he has the green
one. Has that has a photo of the
actual email. He received right here on the
site, on The Black Vault. Calm, the article goes on.
It says, neither 8, quote, neither aatip.
It's a tip or aawsap A a w s a p.
Were you a p? Related said the Pentagon
spokesperson Susan, cough in an email to The Black Vault.
The purpose of a tip was to investigate foreign Advanced
Aerospace weapon systems applications with future
technology projections, over the next forty years and to create a
center of expertise are Advanced Aerospace Technologies. since
2017 details have been scarce however the DVDs latest
position, the a tip wasn't a UFO program, seems to represent one
of the most dramatic about faces on the issue since the program
was first revealed cuz I want to say the aawsap or a sap, I guess
ossip golf refers to is the advanced Aerospace weapon
system. Applications program.
A contract posted publicly by the defense intelligence agency
asking for bids from the private sector on August 18th. 2008 by
the due date of September 5th, Listen to seem a little strange.
They ask for bids on a contract on October 8th on October, 18th
of 2008, and they want the bids submitted on what three weeks
later on September 5th. Got to meet us at some red flags
off. Call.
Look at this, only one bitter had submitted a proposal and
that was Bigelow Aerospace. Subsidiary.
No one has Bigelow Aerospace Advanced space studies or BAS
Not anybody's, most news program knows about Bigelow and it has
heard of Robert Bigelow, but this is the kind of stuff.
I'm not accusing anybody of anything.
The man is this looks sketchy. You have the Department of
Defense, putting out a contract on August 18th, 2008 and 3 weeks
later, only three weeks later, they going to get three weeks to
prepare for this. I think we all know the minutiae
and all the detail that can be involved in a government
contract and it seems pretty unreasonable for me, to me, at
least that somebody just off the street, should be expected to
prepare and submit a contract within a 3 week at three-week
window that just seems ridiculous.
To me, it's almost like this was set up for one with one person
in mind, and if that's the case, I'm not saying that's what's
going on, but it looks like people are using the federal
government has their own private piggy bank and that just stinks
and even if that's not what's going on.
We need to have appearances should be a little better than
that. I should be more transparency
than this and our government contracting business.
The back of the article, Aerospace axillary nodes,
Bigelow Aerospace Advanced base, taste a bit of bass bass.
They were awarded the contract. And according to the New York
Times, operated with a 22 million dollar budget note, The
Black Vault has not been able to independently verify that budget
amount. Well, for all we know it could
have been a lot more could have been less, but the way these
guys operate in the government today, it seems like 22 million
dollars is a drop in the bucket. Many researchers, this is back.
The article, many researchers Marcus journalist with the
mainstream media of often confused, a tip with aawsap.
So apparently a peck a tip is the entity, the organization,
the government, bureaucracy, whatever.
It's it's, it's the department and aawsap is a contract, is to
actual project, if you will. Such as many researchers
bloggers and journalists within the mainstream media have often
confuse a tip and aawsap along with the missions of both
programs. For example, an anonymous letter
by someone claiming to be involved in the project was
published by klas-tv. And it alleged aawsap was
studying Poltergeist, along with other Paranormal Activity.
This goes back, not interject here for just a second.
You can go back and looks at some of the former podcast that
we've done on Skinwalker Ranch and this is a lot of stuff that
was being alluded to there, is that Bob Bigelow is company.
At least was not only investigating the UFO phenomena,
but was investigating the phenomena of the skinwalkers or
Poltergeist on that Skinwalker Ranch and they were doing so
well. Being government-funded and some
people are upset that they were doing.
So while being government-funded and then, didn't we end up with
this ranch with whoever was managing, Ranch, taking, and
blocking off the roads, going through the ranch a publicly, a
publicly-owned secondary Road had been blocked off and no
trespassing. Signs put up a new member to
talk about that in one of the podcast, how people have gone to
the county, commissioner to the, to the, the county meeting or
whatever. And complained about that.
When you're blocking off public roads, because it might somehow
inadvertently give access to a ranch where you're doing studies
on ghosts, and poltergeists. That doesn't that doesn't look
like transparency, doesn't look like disclosure.
So there's a history of this of this mentality to hide things.
My perspective, I didn't translate well, when you talking
about doing business with the government and bidding on, what
should have been public contracts, let me go on in the
article, the black ball here and it says, another example is a
blogger attempting to create a cohesive timeline of the
programs, but often confuses dates facts and figures that
have already been established and documented.
According to the latest, from the Pentagon.
None of that is a case at 8. If was the name of the overall
program while aawsap was the name of the contract.
That Dia awarded for the production of technical reports,
underrated The titles of those technical reports referred to by
the Pentagon were released via the Freedom of Information Act
for you to The Black Vault on January 16th 2019 which consists
of a list of 38 documents created under the a tip program
mysteriously absent from the topics covered by the defense
intelligence reference ordered, anything directly directly
reference in UFOs, or you a piece.
Topics include some wildly speculative science ranging from
work drives to invisibility cloaking.
However there was nothing about unidentified objects flying in
the sky or captured on video. Some researchers have theorized
this list of research topics was simply an exploration of how
UFOs may work or how an alien civilization.
Might reverse the cosmos in order to visit Earth conversely.
Some have remained skeptical. And felt this list may be proof
that a tip and her a a w s a p had nothing to do with UFOs and
only focused on pseudoscience. The Skeptics appeared to be
proven wrong when I May 22nd 2019 in New York Post.
Ran the headline, the Pentagon finally admits it investigates
UFOs. Most of us can remember when
that headline came out in light of the videos that released for
the aircraft carrier, it was quite a big deal.
But now all of a sudden, my wife and black bulb at the Pentagon
is trying to backtrack on this whole notion and they're saying,
oh no, we weren't investigating UFOs at all.
We were just looking for information about About object
to other countries were developing will listen that
sounds a little hard to believe to me.
When you consider some of the things are investigating.
It seems like if the Communist Chinese or the Soviet Union,
Would have had military craft capable of doing the things that
people reporting. This boy would have been done a
long time ago there that they would have already used those
weapons of warfare to have to take over the world.
Why would, why would they put up with the US meddling in their
business when they have when they have aircraft that are
capable of traveling at near light-speed doesn't make any
sense. Okay, we go on here.
It says the Skeptics appear to be proven wrong on.
May 23rd 2019 the New York Post when the headline the Pentagon
finally admits it investigates UFOs.
At the time this article was published investigative
journalist has Steven Greene Street.
With the New York Post had received word from the Pentagon
through spokesperson Christopher Sherwood the a tip did pursue
research and investigation into unidentified aerial phenomena
understandably. The story then went viral,
however, roughly seven months later, the Pentagon stance, see
things have changed. Although the statement that was
given to the Newark post was accurately reported the
Pentagon. Now States it was not entirely
factbase. Wow, so kinda gone.
Give an official statement. and now, seven months later to come
back and say no no that statement wasn't factbase that's
unfortunate, you would hope that when a major government entity
like a pentagon, gives a statement, Under the pretense.
That is fact that it wouldn't pack be a fact.
But there are being told no and know that there was a mistake,
don't believe that we just need to put the genie back in the
bottle. When asked about the discrepancy
at the time. Mr. Sherwood was repeating the
information that was provided by a previous spokeperson some two
years earlier said gal that previous spoke person is no
longer with my organization and I cannot comment on the fat.
Person's explanation of a tip included that it had an
anomalous that had look at and almost events according to all
the official information I have. Now when implemented a tip did
not pursue research and investigation into unidentified
aerial phenomena, that was not part of the technical studies.
Northern ports produced by the program.
You know, this is a little scary when you read this.
This is a, this is an official from the Pentagon and they're
using pronouns like I and my think about that for a second.
this is a organization that case washed the world like a bug,
they have access to the most powerful weapons ever known to
man, and this person is referring to themselves as my
organization Life as a taxpayer. That it was our organization.
Can you start to see the mindset hear of us them?
Can you start to see the mindset of why people believe there
could be a breakaway civilization and that we're not
part of it it even if it's not a breakaway civilization, is for
this is to say well they've got, you know, massive buildings on
the moon but it's intellectually.
It is a breakaway civilization, think about that.
For one second intellectually and informationally.
It's already a breakaway civilization.
You have those on the inside and then you have the rest of us on
the outside. That previous spokesperson is no
longer with my organization. Why couldn't they have just said
the previous spokesperson is no longer with the Pentagon.
Why did why is it that way? Do you start to see the
ownership or taking on the subject of UFOs?
This isn't emotionally powerful subject to these.
People, they're invested in. It is if it is a religion, they
are invested in. It are approaching this thing
not as a fact-based decision-making.
This thing. This whole subject of UFOs is
being as approaches. If it was some sort of religion,
a secret priesthood and you and I have to be kept on the
outside. Can you feel that coming through
this? This exchange hair when people
see things like my organization, I see this way.
When someone starts to personalize an argument with
words pronouns, like I be mine, only not idea.
They're telling you that they believe in something so strongly
that there's no way in the world you're ever going to change
their mind. They're not approaching this
from an open-minded. perspective from the third person saying
from the outside looking in there owning this thing, Is
exact opposite of disclosure. It goes on to say the black
fault reached out to Green Street and the New York Post but
they did not respond. What comment?
Then it goes on to say, pentagon's, new stance.
City girls new stance conflicts with former Department of
Defense DOD employee Luis Elizondo, according to Elizondo.
He was a director of a tip. And since coming forward in
October of 2017 is consistently maintained, a tip did research
UFOs, slice you a piece, a tip, this is quote self space and
tire time on UFOs. In March of 2019, at the first
annual anomalous are space phenomena, or AAP conference put
on by the scientific calculation for UAP studies.
S you a tip was a 100% UFO program.
It was not looking at airplanes. That goes on to say and it.
Okay, if you get this Elizondo, the guy who says he was a former
head of a tip says, it was 100% UFO program.
This is exact opposite of what the Pentagon has just said, the
Pentagon has just said, basically, it's a 100, The
airplane program Elizondo says, Nope, we were looking for UFOs
sweats. What is it going to come say
Elizondo Elizondo? Who has her under the bus, man?
And it already confusing Saga. Look at the Pentagon continues
to deny elizondo's role and participation in the aatip
according to Goudy. Honda was not the director of
the ATI of a tip and reiterated. He had no assigned
responsibilities with the program.
Here we go, talkin gibberish again, he had no assigned
responsibilities. So it looks like they're giving
themselves a wiggle room as if we'll maybe he was there and her
some super capacity that we don't get.
This thing is starting to smell more like bubbles are the whole.
I mean all the time with the difference being that, I think
it was on do actually have some street cred, it's like you got a
guy who seems to have been somewhere, who seems to have
been in the right place, but there's no official
documentation. It makes you wonder.
It mean, at first glance to take a guy like Elizondo or lazzara,
and you think he's a nut job. We just watch that, you know,
he's some sort of Forrest Gump of the UFO genre.
But the more you look at it, why do these people need to go to
the trouble of denying him? Why can't, why can't I just let
the facts speak for themselves? The whole thing seems sketchy to
me. That's my opinion.
It goes honest is currently Elizondo serves as a director of
government programs and services.
For to the stars of Academy Arts is TTS, a republic quote, a
public benefit and quote operation led by Rockstar Tom
DeLonge and stars in The History Channel, series called
unidentified inside America's UFO investigation.
All right. Hold on one second here.
The pentagon's denying that Elizondo had anything.
In a assigned role with a tip. He said he was he was a director
of it, they say you know he's not basically the calling the
guy wire will that being the case.
Why on Earth did they sign a contract with the company?
He works for To develop technology for the US Army using
using UFO metamaterial. He says they possess if the
guy's a liar. Is there basically implying that
he is, why would you believe him to the point where you're paying
his company? What I've done, a million
dollars to do research on UFO, omit omit metamaterial, they
claim to have, it makes no sense.
Currently serves as a director of the program and services for
to the Stars Academy, a public benefit Corporation led by
Rockstar Tom DeLonge and stars in A History Channel series
called an identified inside America's UFO investigation in
the past Elizondo House, address a hierarchy of a tip and aawsap
programs. It would be disingenuous for me
to Simply say well a tip is really aawsap well at evolve
from aawsap but is not aawsap unquote said during an annual
Mutual UFO Network move on conference in July of 2018.
And I think the documentation that is beginning to come out
into the public forum, people are beginning to realize that
Elizondo told the crowd of UFO. Enthusiasts Elizondo, did not
return a request to return a request for comment from the
black fault. Although the pentagon's change
to pray to a previous statement may concern and frustrate a
segment of the general public excited about UFO.
Recent developments hope is not entirely lost the Pentagon.
Maintains as of the writing of this article that the u.s.
Navy continues to investigate UA fees and the three videos that
have surfaced in the past two years, that have Garner Garner
Garnered worldwide. Attention are still considered
you a piece. So the Pentagon hasn't tried to
change, or close the door on the whole UFO topic.
Something should still in something that she still
encouraged and fiercest of the UFO subject.
Well, that is Food For Thought. The question here is is a
pentagon simply trying to throw Elizondo Delong and Friends
under the bus so that they can regain ownership of the UFO
narrative. Has Elizondo.
Possibly over-represented himself into a tip program as
they seem to speculate here. Personally, I don't know, but I
do find a whole thing. Very interesting, how do you
recommend go to the blackboard.com?
Check out the article? That's plenty of length.
There is so much good material on that site is unbelievable.
Until next time, this is UFO warning saying over and out