1
00:00:03,040 --> 00:00:05,280
Hello and welcome to the program
UFO Warning. 

2
00:00:05,320 --> 00:00:08,119
In this episode we're talking 
about, what about Bigfoot? 

3
00:00:08,400 --> 00:00:10,720
That's correct. 
What about Bigfoot? 

4
00:00:11,160 --> 00:00:15,080
Bigfoot's a topic that we don't 
cover a ton on this program, but

5
00:00:15,080 --> 00:00:17,120
I just think it's so fascinating
with so many people having 

6
00:00:17,120 --> 00:00:19,720
reported these things. 
And the question often arises, 

7
00:00:19,720 --> 00:00:22,960
are these biological creatures, 
are they some sort of Cryptid? 

8
00:00:23,480 --> 00:00:27,560
Are they perhaps UFO alien ET 
non human entity related? 

9
00:00:28,120 --> 00:00:32,200
This first article takes us is 
from lifescience.com says the 

10
00:00:32,200 --> 00:00:35,520
most famous Bigfoot sightings 
written by Patrick Pester 

11
00:00:35,520 --> 00:00:40,920
published December 27th 2022. 
Bigfoot are Sasquatch is one of 

12
00:00:40,920 --> 00:00:43,920
North America's most enduring 
legends with thousands of people

13
00:00:43,920 --> 00:00:46,440
claiming to have seen the giant 
ape like creature. 

14
00:00:46,800 --> 00:00:50,080
Here are the most famous Bigfoot
sightings it says and it's got a

15
00:00:50,080 --> 00:00:52,880
pretty cool illustration. 
Here it says Bigfoot or 

16
00:00:52,880 --> 00:00:56,000
Sasquatch is one of North 
America's most enduring legends.

17
00:00:56,520 --> 00:00:59,840
The scientific community largely
dismisses the idea of a large 

18
00:00:59,840 --> 00:01:02,840
unknown ape like creatures 
sauntering through the forest 

19
00:01:02,840 --> 00:01:05,640
because there's never been any 
hard evidence that such an 

20
00:01:05,640 --> 00:01:08,120
animal exists. 
Now I will say there's been some

21
00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:12,960
hair samples found that have 
come back I believe has non 

22
00:01:12,960 --> 00:01:15,920
human that they really haven't 
resolved it. 

23
00:01:15,960 --> 00:01:18,720
And I think part of the problem 
with this might be just because 

24
00:01:18,720 --> 00:01:21,480
people are so close minded about
this stuff, it says. 

25
00:01:21,480 --> 00:01:24,040
Nonetheless, there have been 
thousands of reported eyewitness

26
00:01:24,040 --> 00:01:26,680
accounts over the last half 
century from people all over the

27
00:01:26,800 --> 00:01:29,680
US and Canada. 
Here are some of the most famous

28
00:01:29,720 --> 00:01:32,760
Bigfoot sightings. 
One of the most famous Bigfoot 

29
00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:35,200
sightings allegedly occurred on 
Mica Mountain in British 

30
00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:38,880
Columbia in 1955, when a man 
called William Rowe claimed he 

31
00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:42,600
saw a partly human, partly 
animal creature while hiking. 

32
00:01:43,200 --> 00:01:47,280
He swore in affidavit in 1957 
that the creature was about 6 

33
00:01:47,280 --> 00:01:52,760
foot tall and covered in brown 
silver tipped hair with thick 

34
00:01:52,800 --> 00:01:57,080
arms, reaching down to its 
knees, broad feet and breast, 

35
00:01:57,080 --> 00:02:01,000
according to the Alberto 
Sasquatch organization website. 

36
00:02:01,000 --> 00:02:02,440
Now this would just be quite an 
animal. 

37
00:02:02,440 --> 00:02:05,400
It's 6 feet tall, not as tall as
we think of a lot of these 

38
00:02:06,440 --> 00:02:09,320
Bigfoot, possibly a juvenile, 
who knows, but the fact that his

39
00:02:09,320 --> 00:02:11,800
arms reached clear down to its 
knees, he says. 

40
00:02:11,800 --> 00:02:14,440
As I watched this creature I 
wondered if some movie company 

41
00:02:14,440 --> 00:02:17,480
was making a film at this place 
and what I saw was an actor 

42
00:02:17,960 --> 00:02:21,080
made-up to look partly human and
partly animal, wrote wrote in 

43
00:02:21,080 --> 00:02:24,800
his 1957 affidavit. 
But as I observed it more, I 

44
00:02:24,800 --> 00:02:28,400
decided it would be impossible 
to fake such a specimen. 

45
00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:32,560
According to abominable science 
origins of the Yeti nasty other 

46
00:02:32,560 --> 00:02:36,440
famous cryptids rose ape like 
siding marks a change from 

47
00:02:36,440 --> 00:02:39,000
earlier Sasquatch accounts from 
British Columbia which 

48
00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:42,200
repeatedly describes Sasquatch 
as a giant sized indigenous 

49
00:02:42,200 --> 00:02:44,960
person. 
In other words, it was the birth

50
00:02:45,000 --> 00:02:49,360
of modern Bigfoot, though that 
name wouldn't emerge for another

51
00:02:49,360 --> 00:02:52,000
year. 
Scientists argue that eyewitness

52
00:02:52,000 --> 00:02:54,960
testimony isn't always reliable.
So this and other sightings are 

53
00:02:54,960 --> 00:02:57,440
not conclusive evidence? 
Well, of course they're not 

54
00:02:57,440 --> 00:03:00,280
conclusive, but they're 
eyewitness evidence, OK? 

55
00:03:00,520 --> 00:03:02,320
And we've talked about many 
times during this program. 

56
00:03:02,880 --> 00:03:05,360
People are locked up all over 
this country based on eyewitness

57
00:03:05,360 --> 00:03:07,400
evidence. 
So if eyewitness evidence is not

58
00:03:07,400 --> 00:03:10,080
worth anything, I guess we 
better change the court system, 

59
00:03:10,080 --> 00:03:12,640
hadn't we? 
Prospector Albert Osment claimed

60
00:03:12,640 --> 00:03:16,080
that he spent around a week with
a Bigfoot family near Toba 

61
00:03:16,080 --> 00:03:21,480
Inlet, British Columbia in 1924.
Osman was camping alone when he 

62
00:03:21,480 --> 00:03:25,040
says he was scooped up in his 
sleeping bag by a Papa Bigfoot 

63
00:03:25,440 --> 00:03:28,040
and taken to meet Mama Bigfoot 
and two Bigfoot children. 

64
00:03:28,520 --> 00:03:31,800
Osman was supposedly held 
captive by the family, but said 

65
00:03:31,800 --> 00:03:35,560
he eventually escaped when Papa 
Bigfoot ate Osman's chewing 

66
00:03:35,560 --> 00:03:38,360
tobacca and fell. 
I'll According to a retelling of

67
00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:43,080
the story, anthropologist David 
Daling's book Bigfoot Exposed 

68
00:03:43,080 --> 00:03:45,920
and Anthropologist examines 
American enduring legend. 

69
00:03:46,240 --> 00:03:48,440
Yeah, some people don't really 
like to swallow that tobacco 

70
00:03:48,440 --> 00:03:50,200
juice. 
It can be nasty if you're not 

71
00:03:50,200 --> 00:03:53,080
used to it, that's for sure. 
Ossman's description of his 

72
00:03:53,080 --> 00:03:57,360
captors are similar to that of 
Rose 1957 account. 

73
00:03:57,680 --> 00:04:01,240
However, Dagling points out in 
his book that even though Osman 

74
00:04:01,560 --> 00:04:06,880
said the encounter took place in
1924, he didn't write it down 

75
00:04:06,880 --> 00:04:10,080
until 1957, after he heard Rose 
tell. 

76
00:04:10,320 --> 00:04:13,000
So he may have been inspired or 
influenced by Roe. 

77
00:04:13,440 --> 00:04:16,000
Well, that's quite possible. 
But you know, a lot of times 

78
00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:18,560
those old timers, they heard 
things, saw things they just 

79
00:04:18,560 --> 00:04:21,360
never talked about. 
It goes on and says what is 

80
00:04:21,360 --> 00:04:24,560
likely the most famous Bigfoot 
sighting was caught on camera in

81
00:04:24,560 --> 00:04:27,400
1967. 
The Patterson Gimlin film is a 

82
00:04:27,400 --> 00:04:30,280
minute long video that appears 
to show a female Bigfoot, later 

83
00:04:30,280 --> 00:04:32,800
nicknamed Patty, walking through
a clearing in Northern 

84
00:04:32,800 --> 00:04:35,640
California. 
The film was still often held up

85
00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:38,800
by Bigfoot believers as the best
piece of evidence for the 

86
00:04:38,800 --> 00:04:41,640
creature's existence. 
The scientific community has 

87
00:04:41,640 --> 00:04:44,880
overwhelmingly dismissed the 
film as showing a person wearing

88
00:04:44,880 --> 00:04:47,240
a costume. 
Well, we know you have to follow

89
00:04:47,240 --> 00:04:50,200
the science, don't you? 
Because hey, we've got this 

90
00:04:50,200 --> 00:04:52,320
elite group of people on top 
that know everything. 

91
00:04:52,320 --> 00:04:54,200
Their name, science. 
Just do what do whatever they 

92
00:04:54,200 --> 00:04:55,720
tell you, believe whatever they 
say. 

93
00:04:56,160 --> 00:04:59,560
Jeffrey Meldrum, a professor of 
anatomy and anthropology at 

94
00:04:59,560 --> 00:05:02,520
Idaho State University. 
We've seen this guy on TV 8. 

95
00:05:02,520 --> 00:05:05,400
Seems like a pretty cool guy to 
me and author of Sasquatch 

96
00:05:05,400 --> 00:05:09,000
Legend Me Science is one of the 
few science to publicly backed 

97
00:05:09,000 --> 00:05:10,840
the film and the existence of 
Bigfoot. 

98
00:05:11,280 --> 00:05:14,120
Meldrum told Live Science that 
not only is he convinced the 

99
00:05:14,120 --> 00:05:16,400
film was real, but believes it's
grown more incredible. 

100
00:05:16,440 --> 00:05:17,960
It's grown more credible over 
time. 

101
00:05:18,560 --> 00:05:21,320
The creature's walk was 
criticized in the 1960s for 

102
00:05:21,320 --> 00:05:23,840
being too human. 
But Meldrum argues that the 

103
00:05:23,840 --> 00:05:26,240
subsequent scientific 
discoveries, such as Lucy, an 

104
00:05:26,240 --> 00:05:30,160
extinct 3.2 million year old 
human ancestor, reveal or ape 

105
00:05:30,160 --> 00:05:33,640
like ancestors walked upright. 
So there's now a scientific 

106
00:05:33,640 --> 00:05:36,080
justification for the creatures 
of human like gait. 

107
00:05:36,440 --> 00:05:39,160
Yeah, I think that Meldrum kind 
of goes for the idea that these 

108
00:05:39,160 --> 00:05:42,440
things are some sort of, you 
know, throwback species to the 

109
00:05:42,440 --> 00:05:45,440
humans. 
I'm not so sure. 

110
00:05:45,520 --> 00:05:47,640
Maybe. 
It seems to me though, that 

111
00:05:47,640 --> 00:05:50,240
they're a lot more likely to be 
some sort of non human entity. 

112
00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:54,000
What you see in that film is 
exactly how we envision 

113
00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:58,600
something like a robust author 
put the scene to look at, 

114
00:05:58,600 --> 00:06:01,200
Meldrum said. 
It's almost as if now the 

115
00:06:01,200 --> 00:06:04,840
science has finally caught up to
this whole phenomena of Bigfoot.

116
00:06:05,240 --> 00:06:08,320
Meldrum noted that anatomical 
features visible on the film, 

117
00:06:08,320 --> 00:06:11,560
such as the proportions of the 
face, match up with early 

118
00:06:11,560 --> 00:06:15,600
humans, such as Parenthropus 
Boise, a species that lived 

119
00:06:15,600 --> 00:06:19,600
around 2.3 million years ago to 
1.2 million years ago. 

120
00:06:19,840 --> 00:06:22,560
According to the Smithsonian 
National Museum of Natural 

121
00:06:22,560 --> 00:06:25,200
History, the size of the 
creature in the film was 

122
00:06:25,200 --> 00:06:30,080
estimated to be to be between 
6:00 and 7:00 foot tall. 

123
00:06:30,480 --> 00:06:33,440
Wow, that's, you know, it would 
be kind of neat if they could go

124
00:06:33,440 --> 00:06:35,360
back and really do an exact 
estimation on that. 

125
00:06:35,360 --> 00:06:37,960
Maybe they have, and someone can
tell us exactly how high, how 

126
00:06:37,960 --> 00:06:41,000
tall they think this thing was. 
And, you know, if it's seven 

127
00:06:41,000 --> 00:06:43,560
foot tall, I think we could 
pretty well rule out the same 

128
00:06:43,560 --> 00:06:45,360
being a man. 
Unless, unless you know that 

129
00:06:45,440 --> 00:06:48,960
that that the head costume would
be that much outsized. 

130
00:06:48,960 --> 00:06:51,280
I don't know. 
However, most experts are not 

131
00:06:51,280 --> 00:06:54,760
convinced by the footage. 
Deron Nish, a paleozoologist and

132
00:06:54,760 --> 00:06:57,800
the author of Hunting Monsters, 
Cryptozoology and Reality Behind

133
00:06:57,800 --> 00:07:01,080
the Mists, summarize plenty of 
reasons to question the film's 

134
00:07:01,080 --> 00:07:03,280
authenticity in a 2020 Twitter 
thread. 

135
00:07:03,640 --> 00:07:06,640
Most notably, he highlights that
Patterson, who shot the film, 

136
00:07:07,280 --> 00:07:10,280
had already turned Bigfoot into 
a money spending operation 

137
00:07:10,280 --> 00:07:13,960
before releasing it. 
But Nisha as that Patty's Pelt 

138
00:07:13,960 --> 00:07:18,360
appears to glisten and move like
that of a real animal, and her 

139
00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:21,960
muscle movements look genuine, 
suggesting it's a very good 

140
00:07:21,960 --> 00:07:23,960
hoax. 
No matter how much evidence you 

141
00:07:23,960 --> 00:07:27,160
give some of these people, 
they're never going to entertain

142
00:07:27,160 --> 00:07:29,080
the possibility that these 
things are real. 

143
00:07:29,480 --> 00:07:32,840
Brian Riggle, an associate 
professor of history science at 

144
00:07:32,840 --> 00:07:35,400
Keene University in New Jersey 
and author of Searching for 

145
00:07:35,400 --> 00:07:38,840
Sasquatch, Crackpots, Eggheads, 
and Cryptozoology, is more 

146
00:07:38,840 --> 00:07:40,800
damning of the film. 
You know, with a title like 

147
00:07:40,800 --> 00:07:42,800
that, I mean, what? 
What are you going to assume and

148
00:07:42,800 --> 00:07:45,200
told life Science that people 
project their own views on the 

149
00:07:45,200 --> 00:07:47,680
Paddy? 
You look at it and you see what 

150
00:07:47,680 --> 00:07:50,120
you want to believe, he said. 
I don't know. 

151
00:07:50,120 --> 00:07:52,560
I'm just looking at it and 
seeing this creature walk across

152
00:07:52,560 --> 00:07:55,160
the Creek, and I don't know if 
it's a man in a suit or an 

153
00:07:55,160 --> 00:07:57,280
animal, but it looks pretty 
convincing. 

154
00:07:57,640 --> 00:08:01,640
The Ape Canyon incident in 1924 
wasn't so much an alleged 

155
00:08:01,640 --> 00:08:05,280
sighting as a supposed battle. 
A group of gold prospectors 

156
00:08:05,280 --> 00:08:08,160
claimed they defended their 
cabin against multiple Gorilla 

157
00:08:08,160 --> 00:08:11,880
Men in a gorge later named Ape 
Canyon on the side of Mount 

158
00:08:11,880 --> 00:08:14,280
Saint Helens. 
One of the miners, Fred Beck, 

159
00:08:14,280 --> 00:08:17,680
allegedly shot at a Sasquatch 
during the day, which prompted a

160
00:08:17,680 --> 00:08:19,720
gang of its Harry Brethren to 
seek revenge. 

161
00:08:19,720 --> 00:08:22,120
Come nightfall. 
The creatures are said to have 

162
00:08:22,120 --> 00:08:25,520
pelted the miners cabin with 
rocks and boulders, and one even

163
00:08:25,520 --> 00:08:28,960
reached an arm inside. 
The miners survive the onslaught

164
00:08:28,960 --> 00:08:32,120
and as the sun rose, the beast 
retreated back into the woods, 

165
00:08:32,400 --> 00:08:36,480
possibly after Beck shot 1. 
Beck returned to the scene with 

166
00:08:36,559 --> 00:08:39,679
US forest Rangers after news 
broke of the attack. 

167
00:08:40,039 --> 00:08:42,799
The Rangers couldn't find a 
Sasquatch body and apparently 

168
00:08:42,799 --> 00:08:45,680
weren't impressed with the large
stones they found next to the 

169
00:08:45,680 --> 00:08:49,640
cabin or the supposed giant 
footprints nearby, the local 

170
00:08:49,640 --> 00:08:52,320
Oregonian newspaper reported at 
the time. 

171
00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:54,440
The Rangers seemed to think the 
miners placed the stones there 

172
00:08:54,440 --> 00:08:57,240
themselves and that the 
footprints were made by a human 

173
00:08:57,240 --> 00:09:05,080
hand. 1924 I mean, you know, 
these guys just had to work hard

174
00:09:05,080 --> 00:09:07,200
enough to get through a day. 
It seems hard to imagine they 

175
00:09:07,200 --> 00:09:09,080
would have had time to Jack 
around with this stuff. 

176
00:09:09,640 --> 00:09:11,520
One popular explanation for the 
Canyon story? 

177
00:09:11,640 --> 00:09:14,880
Four of us skeptics, other than 
the miners simply making up, is 

178
00:09:14,880 --> 00:09:17,520
that the miners were actually 
set upon by a gang of local 

179
00:09:17,520 --> 00:09:20,600
youth throwing rocks at the 
cabin for fun, according to 

180
00:09:20,600 --> 00:09:23,560
travel website Atlas Obscure. 
Although this doesn't account 

181
00:09:23,560 --> 00:09:25,120
for all the aspects of the 
story. 

182
00:09:25,480 --> 00:09:27,400
Yeah, it's a favorite thing 
these guys like to do. 

183
00:09:27,760 --> 00:09:31,400
They just throw some, you know, 
some garbage up against the wall

184
00:09:31,400 --> 00:09:35,800
and see if it sticks, ignore the
evidence, and then cite an 

185
00:09:35,800 --> 00:09:38,880
anonymous source. 
That's kind of the that's that's

186
00:09:38,880 --> 00:09:43,040
kind of the MO here. 
Scott Tompkins, the data manager

187
00:09:43,040 --> 00:09:45,520
and founder of the Bigfoot 
Mapping Project, a website that 

188
00:09:45,520 --> 00:09:49,040
hosts around 8000 historical and
modern Bigfoot sightings, told 

189
00:09:49,040 --> 00:09:51,840
Life Science that most Bigfoot 
sightings he's mapped don't end 

190
00:09:51,840 --> 00:09:53,840
in conflict. 
When people describe the 

191
00:09:53,840 --> 00:09:56,720
behavior of such creatures, they
seem to be very curious but non 

192
00:09:56,720 --> 00:09:58,200
confrontational. 
As Tompkins said. 

193
00:09:58,680 --> 00:10:01,400
I can, I can understand that it 
seems like these if these things

194
00:10:01,400 --> 00:10:03,920
were really out to get you, it 
seems like there'd be a lot more

195
00:10:03,920 --> 00:10:05,480
missing people and a lot more 
dead people. 

196
00:10:05,800 --> 00:10:07,960
I'm not saying it doesn't 
happen, but I'm just saying it 

197
00:10:07,960 --> 00:10:11,320
seems like that's not the 
normal, the normal role these 

198
00:10:11,320 --> 00:10:13,800
things play. 
There are many Bigfoot videos on

199
00:10:13,800 --> 00:10:16,680
YouTube, but few are as popular 
as a clip from Provo Canyon, 

200
00:10:16,680 --> 00:10:18,800
Utah. 
The video appears to show a 

201
00:10:18,800 --> 00:10:23,080
large black animal hunched over 
in the trees, possibly feeding 

202
00:10:23,080 --> 00:10:25,520
or foraging. 
The camera zooms in to try to 

203
00:10:25,520 --> 00:10:27,800
get a closer look, and a few 
seconds later the great creature

204
00:10:27,800 --> 00:10:30,240
stands up on two legs as if it's
bipedal. 

205
00:10:30,520 --> 00:10:33,040
This causes the pair behind the 
camera to immediately turn and 

206
00:10:33,040 --> 00:10:35,280
run away. 
The video was posted October 

207
00:10:35,280 --> 00:10:38,840
30th, 2012 and has amassed more 
than 7.6 million views on 

208
00:10:38,920 --> 00:10:43,680
YouTube, according to account 
uploader Beard card, the pair 

209
00:10:43,680 --> 00:10:46,840
were on a camping trip, hoping 
to get a closer look at a deer 

210
00:10:46,840 --> 00:10:49,560
on a hill. 
On our way up we thought we saw 

211
00:10:49,560 --> 00:10:52,480
a bear until the monster stood 
up and looked straight at us, 

212
00:10:52,800 --> 00:10:54,480
Bear Card wrote in the video 
description. 

213
00:10:54,800 --> 00:10:58,000
We ran straight to the car after
that, leaving our tent and 

214
00:10:58,000 --> 00:11:00,280
everything behind. 
It's probably all still up 

215
00:11:00,280 --> 00:11:02,480
there. 
Wow, that would be pretty 

216
00:11:02,480 --> 00:11:04,680
frightening I suppose, Even if 
it was a black bear. 

217
00:11:04,960 --> 00:11:08,760
I mean, still you're you have 
this big animal just staring up 

218
00:11:08,760 --> 00:11:09,760
and confronting you. 
Almost. 

219
00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:12,960
The Provo Canyon video short and
inconclusive, Eric Record, 

220
00:11:12,960 --> 00:11:18,480
curator of Vertebrate zoology at
the Natural History Museum of 

221
00:11:18,480 --> 00:11:22,800
Utah, told Fox 13 News, Utah 
after a more recent alleged 

222
00:11:22,800 --> 00:11:27,480
sighting in 2019 that science 
didn't support a Bigfoot in the 

223
00:11:27,480 --> 00:11:30,160
state. 
Yep, follow the science. 

224
00:11:30,240 --> 00:11:32,560
Must not be a Bigfoot. 
Well, it's the likelihood that 

225
00:11:32,560 --> 00:11:35,720
there are big animals that have 
gone undetected by scientists 

226
00:11:35,720 --> 00:11:37,560
and by trained observers, 
Rickard said. 

227
00:11:37,960 --> 00:11:40,080
There are lots of things to 
discover, particularly in the 

228
00:11:40,080 --> 00:11:42,680
natural world, that they don't 
take the form of giant apes 

229
00:11:42,680 --> 00:11:45,520
running around in largely 
settled areas of the world. 

230
00:11:45,880 --> 00:11:48,280
Well, that's exactly why I think
these things are cooked as a 

231
00:11:48,280 --> 00:11:50,320
some sort and they're not by 
lot. 

232
00:11:50,320 --> 00:11:55,160
Maybe they maybe they take on a 
biological form, you know, but 

233
00:11:55,160 --> 00:11:56,960
there's some sort of non human 
entity. 

234
00:11:56,960 --> 00:12:00,080
I believe Skunk Apes are 
supposedly swamp dwelling 

235
00:12:00,080 --> 00:12:03,320
versions of Bigfoot that are 
rumored to roam the southeastern

236
00:12:03,680 --> 00:12:06,560
US. 
October 28th, 2013 a YouTube 

237
00:12:06,560 --> 00:12:09,840
account named Josh Highcliffe 
uploaded one of the most popular

238
00:12:09,840 --> 00:12:12,720
Skunk Ape videos. 
In it the cameraman films a 

239
00:12:12,720 --> 00:12:16,400
potential skunk ape forging in a
Mississippi swamp. 

240
00:12:16,480 --> 00:12:20,680
It looks like a gorilla squatted
down big broad shoulders, little

241
00:12:20,680 --> 00:12:23,720
peaked head, and it's pulling 
off chunks of wood that seemed 

242
00:12:23,720 --> 00:12:27,400
to demonstrate extreme strength.
Then all of a sudden it stands 

243
00:12:27,400 --> 00:12:30,840
up and it's got these long legs,
Meldrum said, impressed by the 

244
00:12:30,840 --> 00:12:32,920
video but yet to examine it in 
detail. 

245
00:12:33,400 --> 00:12:36,280
The last shot of the creature in
the video comes just as it 

246
00:12:36,280 --> 00:12:39,320
stands up, somewhere to the 2012
Provo Canyon video. 

247
00:12:39,760 --> 00:12:42,760
Unfortunately, people filming 
Bigfoot have a tendency to 

248
00:12:42,760 --> 00:12:45,880
suddenly jerk the camera and run
away just as they're about to 

249
00:12:45,880 --> 00:12:49,440
get a good view of 1. 
Understandably fearful and if 

250
00:12:49,440 --> 00:12:51,720
the creature exists, but 
convenient if they're creating a

251
00:12:51,720 --> 00:12:53,800
host. 
Folks, this is one of many 

252
00:12:53,800 --> 00:12:57,280
reasons why skeptics to cry such
videos and ask believers to 

253
00:12:57,280 --> 00:13:00,200
produce a body. 
I think asking people to produce

254
00:13:00,200 --> 00:13:02,360
a body this thing is a bad idea 
because you're going to 

255
00:13:02,360 --> 00:13:05,360
eventually end up with some 
jughead out there wearing a 

256
00:13:05,360 --> 00:13:06,960
Bigfoot costume that gets shot 
and killed. 

257
00:13:07,400 --> 00:13:09,880
And like we had the guy that was
trying to prank people wearing a

258
00:13:09,880 --> 00:13:12,280
Bigfoot costume a few years ago,
it ran out in front of a car, 

259
00:13:12,280 --> 00:13:14,120
got himself killed, and we don't
want that. 

260
00:13:14,360 --> 00:13:17,920
In 2008, two men, Rick Dyer and 
Matthew Whitten, claimed to 

261
00:13:17,920 --> 00:13:20,600
possess a frozen body of a 
Bigfoot specimen. 

262
00:13:21,200 --> 00:13:23,400
They said they found it while 
hiking in the woods in northern 

263
00:13:23,400 --> 00:13:25,680
Georgia. 
Their story made headlines, but 

264
00:13:25,680 --> 00:13:28,000
the body turned out to be a 
rubber gorilla suit. 

265
00:13:28,320 --> 00:13:31,120
Yeah, you're always going to 
have these these knuckleheads 

266
00:13:31,120 --> 00:13:34,480
trying to, you know, prank the 
media. 

267
00:13:34,760 --> 00:13:37,080
It's not helpful now, it says 
here. 

268
00:13:37,080 --> 00:13:40,160
While not a sighting per SE, 
Bigfoot footprints are among the

269
00:13:40,160 --> 00:13:42,960
most commonly reported aspects 
of the Bigfoot phenomena. 

270
00:13:43,440 --> 00:13:47,640
Even the name Bigfoot stems from
a seemingly bogus 1958 story 

271
00:13:47,640 --> 00:13:49,600
about giant footprints in 
Northern California found by a 

272
00:13:49,600 --> 00:13:52,560
man called Ray Wallace. 
His children later claimed that 

273
00:13:52,560 --> 00:13:54,720
their prints were their father's
prank, according to the 

274
00:13:54,720 --> 00:13:57,240
Smithsonian. 
Meldrum argues that hoaxers are 

275
00:13:57,240 --> 00:14:00,760
rare and that he's got plenty of
legitimate footprints that back 

276
00:14:00,760 --> 00:14:04,440
up the masses of sightings. 
Yeah, I think there probably are

277
00:14:04,440 --> 00:14:07,960
a little bit of both on these. 
I've got over 300 footprint cast

278
00:14:07,960 --> 00:14:11,800
copies and original materials in
my laboratory that formed the 

279
00:14:11,800 --> 00:14:15,880
basis of remarkable body of data
that attest to the fact that 

280
00:14:15,880 --> 00:14:18,080
there is something out there 
leaving these footprints, 

281
00:14:18,080 --> 00:14:20,800
Meldrum said. 
And the most straightforward 

282
00:14:20,800 --> 00:14:24,040
answer is that it's a bipedal 
primate species that's not 

283
00:14:24,040 --> 00:14:27,280
recognized by science. 
Skeptics, however, will wait for

284
00:14:27,280 --> 00:14:28,200
a body. 
All right. 

285
00:14:28,200 --> 00:14:32,200
Just feel like if there ever was
a body found that that thing's 

286
00:14:32,200 --> 00:14:35,160
going to disappear quicker than 
the June snow. 

287
00:14:35,360 --> 00:14:37,520
I tell you, they're not going to
let you have one of these things

288
00:14:37,520 --> 00:14:39,600
if you do find one. 
And then I hate to be the guy 

289
00:14:39,600 --> 00:14:43,680
that turned it in. 
Now, I did find another personal

290
00:14:44,160 --> 00:14:47,360
tale on Reddit about somebody 
had a Bigfoot experience. 

291
00:14:47,360 --> 00:14:51,560
I did a little editing on it and
it's also insightful, I think, 

292
00:14:51,760 --> 00:14:54,400
this person says. 
When I was younger, I arrived at

293
00:14:54,400 --> 00:14:57,120
the conclusion that Sasquatch 
couldn't possibly exist. 

294
00:14:57,520 --> 00:15:01,720
Initially I held on to optimism,
but my enthusiasm waned as all 

295
00:15:01,720 --> 00:15:04,920
intriguing pieces of evidence 
were consistently disproven. 

296
00:15:05,000 --> 00:15:07,480
Quote UN quote. 
Even the more compelling proof, 

297
00:15:07,480 --> 00:15:10,800
such as the Patterson Gimlin 
Field and the Skokin Cache were 

298
00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:13,160
almost invariably dismissed as 
proven hoaxes. 

299
00:15:13,600 --> 00:15:16,520
Despite the continuous 
sightings, the subjects only 

300
00:15:16,520 --> 00:15:19,160
remaining alerted me stem from 
first hand accounts. 

301
00:15:19,600 --> 00:15:23,280
Numerous individuals share their
experiences with me, devoid of 

302
00:15:23,280 --> 00:15:26,880
any apparent ulterior motives. 
What kept me intrigued was a 

303
00:15:26,880 --> 00:15:30,440
sheer number of people who, 
throughout the history, claimed 

304
00:15:30,440 --> 00:15:33,920
to witness the same phenomena. 
It seemed implausible that 

305
00:15:33,920 --> 00:15:36,840
thousands would lie about seeing
something inexplicable. 

306
00:15:37,600 --> 00:15:40,040
I might question my sanity and 
light of the encounter I had 

307
00:15:40,040 --> 00:15:43,280
five years ago, but I'm certain 
it wasn't a figment on my 

308
00:15:43,280 --> 00:15:46,000
imagination. 
I'm not alone in having such an 

309
00:15:46,000 --> 00:15:48,880
experience. 
On that day, which started like 

310
00:15:48,880 --> 00:15:52,600
any other, I never anticipated 
anything out of the ordinary. 

311
00:15:53,000 --> 00:15:56,080
As someone with Asperger's, I've
always been a I've always been a

312
00:15:56,080 --> 00:15:58,680
distinct individual, more 
passionate about certain 

313
00:15:58,680 --> 00:16:01,480
subjects than others. 
Locally, I'm known as the kid 

314
00:16:01,480 --> 00:16:04,360
with an extensive knowledge of 
animals who spends a significant

315
00:16:04,360 --> 00:16:08,400
amount of time outdoors. 
On December 15th, 2018, at the 

316
00:16:08,400 --> 00:16:12,280
age of 14, I suggested to my 
parents that we take a drive 

317
00:16:12,280 --> 00:16:15,920
around Patoga Lake. 
The evening was relatively warm,

318
00:16:15,920 --> 00:16:19,360
around 55°, and I hope to spot 
some deer or birds. 

319
00:16:19,760 --> 00:16:22,880
Our entire family, five of us, 
embarked on this drive in 

320
00:16:22,880 --> 00:16:26,440
Crawford County. 
As we drove past Patoka Lake and

321
00:16:26,440 --> 00:16:30,600
continued along, I64I peered out
the window at the Hoosier 

322
00:16:30,600 --> 00:16:33,240
National Forest. 
Occasionally blinded by the 

323
00:16:33,240 --> 00:16:37,360
sun's glare, I lost track of the
roads we traversed and precisely

324
00:16:37,360 --> 00:16:41,040
where my sighting occurred. 
However, I recall a brick house 

325
00:16:41,040 --> 00:16:43,720
with a long driveway surrounded 
by trees nearby. 

326
00:16:44,240 --> 00:16:48,560
Approximately 100 feet away, I 
saw a figure walking parallel to

327
00:16:48,560 --> 00:16:51,480
the road. 
I estimate it stood at least 7 

328
00:16:51,480 --> 00:16:54,280
feet tall, gauging its size 
against the driveway's width. 

329
00:16:54,680 --> 00:16:56,640
The creature had peculiar 
proportions. 

330
00:16:56,960 --> 00:17:02,000
Short legs, a sizable torso, and
elongated arms, all covered in 

331
00:17:02,000 --> 00:17:05,160
long black hair. 
Its muscles resembled those of a

332
00:17:05,160 --> 00:17:07,760
bodybuilder. 
Despite its human like 

333
00:17:07,760 --> 00:17:10,480
appearance. 
It sported a cone head and a 

334
00:17:10,480 --> 00:17:12,720
brow Ridge reminiscent of a 
gorilla. 

335
00:17:13,319 --> 00:17:16,760
I observed every detail except 
for the face, barely 

336
00:17:16,760 --> 00:17:18,640
recognizable from my vantage 
point. 

337
00:17:19,480 --> 00:17:22,680
It felt like witnessing the 
Patterson Gimlin film in person 

338
00:17:23,200 --> 00:17:27,680
with previously unnoted details.
Now standing out in disbelief. 

339
00:17:27,680 --> 00:17:30,680
I was silent for about 5 minutes
after the sighting. 

340
00:17:31,080 --> 00:17:33,320
Numerous questions raised 
through my mind, making it 

341
00:17:33,320 --> 00:17:36,600
difficult to articulate words. 
Eventually I mustered the 

342
00:17:36,600 --> 00:17:39,240
courage to tell my family I saw 
Bigfoot. 

343
00:17:39,840 --> 00:17:42,040
My sister, who claimed to have 
seen it when she was 6, 

344
00:17:42,040 --> 00:17:44,560
exclaimed. 
I told you it was real, although

345
00:17:44,560 --> 00:17:47,880
I suggested turning back the 
lack of suitable places to do so

346
00:17:47,880 --> 00:17:49,760
in the encroaching darkness 
prevented us. 

347
00:17:50,280 --> 00:17:53,360
My dad wholeheartedly believed 
me, pointing out my neck for 

348
00:17:53,360 --> 00:17:57,120
spotting things obscured from 
view, like a deer hidden in 

349
00:17:57,120 --> 00:18:00,320
bushes only visible from the top
part of its head. 

350
00:18:01,000 --> 00:18:03,400
If I had spoken up immediately, 
might we might have captured the

351
00:18:03,400 --> 00:18:07,040
best piece of Bigfoot footage. 
Ever since that sighting I've 

352
00:18:07,040 --> 00:18:09,960
delved into researching other 
possible sightings in Crawford 

353
00:18:09,960 --> 00:18:12,360
County. 
Now I bring that ready to use 

354
00:18:12,360 --> 00:18:15,520
camera every time I hike. 
Witnesses descriptions 

355
00:18:15,520 --> 00:18:18,920
consistently mentioned black 
collar, bipedal walking and 

356
00:18:18,920 --> 00:18:22,720
gorilla like features. 
These sightings typically occur 

357
00:18:22,720 --> 00:18:26,160
between evening and morning, 
suggesting the species might be 

358
00:18:26,160 --> 00:18:28,920
nocturnal. 
Food sources are often linked to

359
00:18:28,920 --> 00:18:32,160
the creature, with reports of 
sightings near deer or crops, 

360
00:18:32,560 --> 00:18:36,080
but took a lake, Marengo and 
Harrison Crawford Forest are hot

361
00:18:36,080 --> 00:18:39,640
spots for sightings in Crawford.
I've discovered numerous people 

362
00:18:39,640 --> 00:18:42,160
openly discussing Bigfoot, to 
the point where it feels like 

363
00:18:42,160 --> 00:18:45,320
the species might have more 
sightings than some known, maybe

364
00:18:45,320 --> 00:18:48,280
native species, such as Gray 
foxes and weasels. 

365
00:18:48,880 --> 00:18:52,320
When you consider the idea of a 
wild person surviving in the 

366
00:18:52,320 --> 00:18:55,880
woods, the existence of 
Sasquatch seems more plausible. 

367
00:18:56,400 --> 00:18:59,440
Humans with fewer offspring, 
longer lifespans, and higher 

368
00:18:59,440 --> 00:19:02,480
intellect could, with a few 
wilderness adaptations, endure 

369
00:19:02,480 --> 00:19:05,160
in such an environment. 
This creature with its longer 

370
00:19:05,160 --> 00:19:09,520
arms for forging, A sagittal 
Crest for chewing, larger feet 

371
00:19:09,520 --> 00:19:12,640
for balance and features 
regulating temperature, aligns 

372
00:19:12,640 --> 00:19:16,560
with this concept with once 
being 15 different species and 

373
00:19:16,560 --> 00:19:19,800
the Homo genius. 
I believe Homo sapiens aren't 

374
00:19:19,800 --> 00:19:23,360
the only sole survivors today. 
Perhaps there is more evidence 

375
00:19:23,360 --> 00:19:25,360
of Sasquatch that remains 
unrecognized. 

376
00:19:25,880 --> 00:19:28,320
I'm now certain that the 
Patterson Gimlin film was 

377
00:19:28,320 --> 00:19:32,240
genuine and skepticism might be 
obscuring judgment for many 

378
00:19:32,240 --> 00:19:34,960
other pieces of evidence. 
Quite possible. 

379
00:19:35,240 --> 00:19:37,680
There again, you know we talk 
about all these problems with 

380
00:19:37,680 --> 00:19:40,800
these things being biological 
only creatures that just happen 

381
00:19:40,800 --> 00:19:44,040
to live here as a subspecies. 
Those problems are kind of just 

382
00:19:44,040 --> 00:19:47,000
solved if you look at these 
things as being some type of non

383
00:19:47,000 --> 00:19:48,920
human entity. 
And we have to ask ourself, 

384
00:19:49,520 --> 00:19:52,400
could they be the non human 
entity that Tucker Carlson and 

385
00:19:52,680 --> 00:19:55,000
Tom Delong and so many others 
have been talking about? 

386
00:19:55,680 --> 00:20:00,560
Maybe just here testing us out, 
testing the environment, looking

387
00:20:00,560 --> 00:20:03,160
for their niche. 
Until next time, this UFO 

388
00:20:03,160 --> 00:20:04,240
warning over now.
