Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode we're talking about Arrow looking for aliens.
That's correct, Arrow looking for aliens.
Now we're talking about Arrow. We're talking about the US
Department of Defence's All Domain Anomaly Resolution
Office. As I always say, the office that
seems to resolve nothing. Not really sure why they've
decided to bring this puff piece out here.
Maybe it's because there's been some talk about, you know, the
need for disclosure. Don't know.
But I think it's important to keep an eye on these guys just
to see what they're up to. This article comes to us from
scientificamerican.com written by Leonard David.
Looks like I stated March 25th, 2025.
Says the US government's top UFO scientist has an open mind about
alien visitation. Begins by saying have you seen
something inexplicable in the sky?
John Koloski, director of the US Department of Defenses All
Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, wants to hear from you.
That's interesting. Whether captured in declassified
military footage or in a smartphone videos uploaded to
social media, UFOs are swarming Earth's skies and demonstrating
capabilities so astonishing that they must represent technologies
that are advanced beyond any available on Earth.
Clearly these sightings point to the involvement of space aliens,
or perhaps just a global cabal of nefarious humans with ultra
spiffy above top secret flying machines that routinely break
the known laws of physics. You can see here by this almost
a 7th grade style of writing that the author is really trying
to minimalize the phenomena of these UFOs.
Just, you know, just kind of cheeky little thing they like to
do. At least that's what modern day
folklore would have you believe, no matter how many times
skeptics convincingly debunk. OK, now you're starting to see
the, the, the narrative that this author is trying to push.
He's not being at all open minded about this.
Look at the term convincingly debunked.
So they're assuming they're assuming that all, all these
phenomena have been explained. So I mean, when, when they say
you can't fix stupid, I mean they're correct, convincingly
debunked. So think about all the, the
millions of people that have had experiences where they've seen
UFOs, where they've had contact with UFOs.
It has to be in the 1,000,000. But yet this guy here says that
skeptics, skeptics have convincingly debunked.
There's no way that a few dozen skeptics online or wherever the
the ones we see all the time have convincingly debunked every
single UFO sighting ever. And we just think about that.
Think about the volume of UFOs sightings that we that we, I
mean, we talk about here all the time, thousands and thousands
and thousands. I just barely scratched the
surface here. And be it we're to believe that
every one of those sightings has been convincingly debunked,
sightings that they don't even know about have been
convincingly debunked. So this is a kind of close
mindedness, the kind of nonsense, the kind of stupidity
that we are up against as these lap dogs in the mainstream media
try to defend an indefensible narrative.
So it goes on and says how many times deputies convincingly
debunked sensational UFO sightings as mere
misidentifications of conventional aircraft sensor art
crafts for natural phenomena. Regardless of what one
personally believes about all of this, what's certain is that
claims of mysterious trespassers in American airspace are taken
very seriously by the US government for reasons of
national security. So he is this very dismissive
tone. Well, they probably are nothing
but mistaken identity. But just to be sure, big daddy
government is going to check into all this so you can go back
to sleep. They're taking the
responsibility for identifying these things off the shoulders
of the viewer, off the average person.
Nothing to see here. Move along sheep and telling you
don't worry about it. The government has this all
under control, all part of the narrative, it goes on.
That's why, at Congress's behest, the US Department of
Defence established its All Domain Anomaly Resolution
Office, where they resolved nothing in July of 2022.
The office investigates reports of UFOs under the more generic
rebranding of unidentified anomalous phenomena.
Uaps. Yeah, they want to equate UFOs
with ball lightning. If they can turn these things
into a weather event, it's that much easier to get people not to
be focused on them. Arrow's work, however, isn't
really about chasing down extraterrestrial invaders so
much as it involves standardizing reporting methods,
curating and analyzing data sets, and assessing possible
threats posed by Uaps. In other words, it's not about,
it's not about identifying UFOs, It's about setting up a massive,
massive spy network where we can surveil the skies.
We can surveil, you know, about everything that's going on.
But then, when a invasion of drones happens in New Jersey or
New York, we're told nothing to see here, move along.
Think less Men in Black and more Pentagon desk jockeys with
advanced degrees and highly classified resumes.
There you go. Appeal to authority.
These guys are so smart that we can't even tell you what their
CV is. They're just that smart.
The office's current director, John Klosky, who took over in
August 2024 after the departure of his predecessor Sean
Kirkpatrick in December 2023, is a good example of the archetype.
This professional past is punctuated by the National
Security Agency research in networking and computing,
optical light communications and cryptography, as well as its
invention of an advanced language agnostic search engine
for the dot. That's what we need.
Somebody who is an expert and spying on us has a picture of
this. Pretty happy looking chap here.
Koloski spoke with Scientific American about his vision and
agenda for Arrow and of course, his thoughts on the
extraterrestrial hypothesis for unexplained UA.
PS I just get the feeling that this time they've brought
somebody out who's a little more approachable, a little less
academic looking. This looks like a dude that you
might somebody that you might be comfortable buying life
insurance from. I'm getting a feeling that he's
going to be this down to earth guy that can sell you a Pooh
sandwich if that's what, yeah, you need to be buying.
As opposed to Kirkpatrick, who just seemed a little bit too
uppity to a lot of people. Koloski spoke with Scientific
American about his vision and agenda for Arrow and of course,
his thoughts on extraterrestrial hypothesis for unexplained UIP
S. The question begins with what
milestone and direction do you and AARO foresee as as you
assess the UAP situation in response?
We have quite a lot going in the office.
We're working diligently to make our AARO website available to
the public so they can report an incident.
Why wouldn't you know it? Wouldn't you like to know what
that thing cost? Wouldn't you like a good old
fashioned doge investigation, the Aero website up and running
cost on that? We want to have a semi automated
processing chain to quickly bring those cases in and then
look for correlations with other cases from government sources.
Or perhaps you could direct the CIA, the Department of Defense,
and the rest of these agencies to just release the files on
UFOs unredacted. That would be a start.
We're also working on machine learning and artificial
intelligence tools that we can look for correlations at a
larger scale. In other words, we're going to
radar map your entire country so we can we can tell immediately
if there's a household drone flying around or if you're out
in your backyard walking your dog and we'll know exactly.
They want 100% God's eye view of everything.
That's what they're really that's what they're really
talking about here. They're not talking about
finding UFOs, they're talking about surveillance.
ARO is also looking at better utilization of the whole fabric
of U.S. government censors that are available.
That will help our case resolutions, but also poses the
potential challenge of looking at an awful lot of data.
In other words, they're spying on so many people, they're
listening to so many conversations, they're reading
so many emails that they're having a really hard time of
trying to process all the information.
But every time there's some kind of a terrible crime, it seems
like the FBI says, well, they were on our radar.
Well, they were on your radar, but why didn't you do anything
to keep these bad things from happening?
I, you should be able to look at this on the surface of it and
say, Oh, well, they want to put this in this whole complex
surveillance network into place, process all this information
using AI, which they've never been able to do before, but yet
they don't seem to be taking any of the UFO reports seriously.
So then what's all this surveillance equipment doing?
If it's not spying on UFOs? Well, maybe it's spying on you.
A last big push is for increased transparency.
But look, that's never going to happen.
Transparency is sunlight to a vampire.
As far as the deep state's gone. They don't want transparency.
They want the opposite of transparency.
Their whole there are whole power base is the foundation is
deception not transparency. Our last big push is for
increased transparency to find more efficient ways to share
information with the public and scientific community to help us
in some of our investigations. Well, you could start by when
people like Greenwald ask for UFO files that are from Korea,
say from 7075 years ago, you could start by sending him files
that haven't been blacked out. You can start there.
That would be that would be a big step in transparency.
Take some of these files that are 6070 years old and that
people have been asking to see for years and years and years.
Go ahead and release those files unredacted.
That would be the first start. Standardizing the UAP data is an
initiative to make it better suited for data science.
As we do that, we'd like having both the raw data as well as
post processing data available to as wide of an audience as
possible. But we need to respect the
sensitivities of the sources and methods used to gather those
data. Yes, sources and method.
Isn't that the same phrase that the FBI used constantly when
your question about some of their recent investigations that
the CIA used when they were asked to release some of these,
some of these most recent files that just can't seem to get
released? All these different parts of the
deep state, when they get caught doing things they shouldn't be
doing, and our elected politicians demand that they
tell us what's going on. All we hear is sources and
methods. Sources and methods.
Well, the sources apparently are unreliable and the methods
involve a lot of deception. So you make up your own mind.
Last November, it says you testified before the Senate
Committee on Armed Service subcommittees on emerging
threats and capabilities. One point you raised was the
importance of removing the stigma of reporting a UAP event.
How much of a problem is that? Before I I give you his answer,
let's just think about how some of these recent whistle blowers
were treated. The open letters written by Sean
Kirkpatrick. Stigma.
Yeah, I think so. It seems to have diminished
quite a bit. He says, thankfully, through a
variety of public endeavours. I think it does persist, for
example, with local law enforcement and some military
members. However, see how he's shifting
the blame. This whole deep personing that's
not from the ground up, that's from the top down, that's been a
hallmark of the deep state since Project Blue Book and all the
rest of this nonsense of depersoning people.
So it's not the the problem is not with local law enforcement.
The problem is not with just some random military members.
It is a way of doing business that the deep state has employed
for over 70 years. He says that they have
experienced some pushback themselves from discussing
events that they've been a part of, but have come forward and
shared that information with AARO.
So maybe the stigma is reduced, but not completely gone.
Good progress is being made there.
Probably there's a little ways to go.
What would you like on your Pooh sandwich?
Ketchup and mustard or just Pickles and onions?
Arrow has reportedly deployed the Gremlin system and we've
talked about this Gremlin system before.
To me, this is a very, very dangerous system.
Just more surveillance, a multi sensor network system for
detecting, tracking and characterizing Uaps and an
undisclosed location. What is the status of this
project? He says Gremlin is envisioned to
be a test bed for sensor evaluations and sensor fusion.
We expect it to be a living system, always evolving.
Why doesn't that make you feel better?
A living system? We will be swapping in and out
new sensors and algorithms for various approaches.
Yeah, what could go wrong? We want to document what we
learn and share that with the public and other organizations
inside the government. The hope is they can take what
we have learned and replicate that.
Yeah, because the deep state is so good at sharing information.
Gremlins itself is going quite well and it's very robust.
It has been running out in the wild for several months now,
gathering data using radar, Electro, optical and infrared
cameras and some electromagnetic sensors.
Gremlin is pulling all that in and detecting events in real
time. We haven't found anything
particularly interesting yet, but there are a few interesting
sightings that are worth investigation.
OK, so they're filming you. They're bombarding you with the
electromagnetic sensors, infrared cameras, detecting you
in real time. You can imagine how much fun
these guys have spying on us in our backyards every single day
of the week. It says.
What does a few interesting sightings mean exactly?
Interesting. From our perspective, it's not
obvious what the object is. It is unidentified, it has some
anomalous characteristics, and in these cases the object
appears to be moving rather quickly, but it doesn't appear
to be using the standard aircraft beacons.
There could be multiple explanations for that, so we're
not jumping to any conclusions, but they are worthy of further
investigation. Yes, sheep go back to sleep.
UFO groups continually demand Full disclosure, by which they
mean more than transparent data sharing, namely the Full
disclosure of putative secret evidence that Earth has been
visited by some form of alien intelligence.
For Arrow, if you come up with a head scratcher of an unknown
phenomena, how would you disclose that fact?
He says there are two things we have to consider.
One is the owner of the data. We would need to work with the
data owner to make sure that we are not revealing sensitive
information about sources and methods.
In other words, this stuff's all coming from the deep state, the
sources. They don't want you to know that
they're spying on you with satellite imagery that is
unbelievable. They could see you changing the
tire in the backyard. And I'll tell you what brand of
watch you're wearing while you're doing it.
I mean, the stuff is that good. We know this.
We know that the satellite imagery is so good that a few
years ago when they had the UFO sightings off the coast of
California, remember, the Navy came out and told us, well, we
can't release those pictures because if we did, it would
compromise security because the pictures are so good that if we
release those, then the Chinese and the Russians would know just
how effective we've become at taking pictures of stuff from
outer space. So they don't want you to know
that, and they also don't want, you know, to the level of which
you're being spied on and recorded every day.
Think about it. They've got these things in
space. The minute you walk out your
door, they can see you. And with AI, they can track you.
So I don't think it's just UFOs that they're interested in
tracking. But somehow, even with all this,
even with all of this phenomenal ability to track people, we
still have these really bad events happening that no one can
seem to take, can can stop before they happen.
We still have missing person cases.
We still have unsolved murder cases.
Even with the ability to track everybody on the planet 24/7,
for some reason, whenever we go to the deep state and say, Hey,
can you help us with this case? Well, nothing to see here.
Looks like the cameras weren't working.
So what good are they really? What good are they?
He goes on and says, But putting that aside, there is nothing
inherently classified about an anonymous event or phenomena.
Really nothing inherently classified about an anomalous
event or phenomena. Then why do we keep, why do we
keep getting so many blacked out papers when it comes to asking
about UFOs? So we would work with our
leadership to document that well, study it, and then produce
a product that can be shared widely with the community.
Yep. Any time they don't want to tell
you the truth, it turns into a word salad.
There is no inherent reason why we would sit on these anomalies
if we did come across something truly perplexing.
Well, the reason is, is because you want to continue the lie.
You want to continue the narrative.
That's the reason that you would sit on these and why you have
been sitting on these, on these for 7080 years.
Given that many Full disclosure advocates would insist that the
absence of evidence for alien position just further confirmed
a government cover up, it seems like any push you could make for
transparency as leader of Arrow would in some respects be doomed
to failure. So why take on the assignment in
the 1st place? Once again you get the very
biased opinion of this author who just obviously is is a
debunker. He should be over there on
Twitter with Mick West and Green Street and the rest of them
putting out a couple 100 tweets a day talking about how UFOs
aren't real anyway, he says. He says.
I love difficult scientific challenges in general.
I enjoy the chase of trying to understand the mystery and
solving puzzles. Uaps by their very nature are
rare events. That means data acquisition is
difficult and there's a sensory design challenge.
I think getting the data we need has been somewhat neglected.
There are groups such as Avulabs, Galileo Project that
are working on better data acquisition, which is fantastic,
but we in the US government could do better.
As a mathematician and data scientist, I enjoy pouring
through the data, looking for the subtle correlations and
teasing out the threads to identify hypothesis and get the
scientific method started. During that with a well called.
Doing that with a well called group with experts from inside
arrow as well as from across the government and hopefully
partying with academia too was just too good of an opportunity
to pass up. Yeah, so was all the fun of
being able to set up the most advanced surveillance system on
the planet. How does AERO engage academia?
Right now, we are primarily focused on a few key
partnerships with the University of Field at Research.
For example, AERO worked with the Georgia Tech Research
Institute, a nonprofit applied research organization of Georgia
Institute of Technology. What you want to see the books
on that thing to develop the Gremlin system?
Oh, yeah. It's appropriately named, I
think, as a UARC, The Georgia Tech Research Institute
partnered with Arrow because of the nature of the contractual
relationships. We can share the data that we
have. Well, sure.
And they can bury the data. And you'll never build a FOIA
because it belongs to a college and not to the US government.
And that's my opinion anyway. And broader engagements with
academia. There is a key step of down
grading classification to ensure we can release the information
that we are working on that always working on getting you
that unredacted page from 70 years ago.
Also an important partnership is the National laboratories.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, for instance, has assisted Arrow
with some of its material analysis.
But right now the focus has been on those few key UAR CS boy
that's affiliated research centers.
Yes. Nothing like setting up more
departments, more of these little boxes within boxes within
boxes to departmentalize and hide the facts.
Is it really accurate to say you're being transparent but
also dealing with sensitive classified data?
He says it's a challenge. Arrow should be as transparent
as possible and we are working in that direction.
At the same time, we need to respect the sensitivities of the
sources and methods. There you go again.
Sources and methods. What are they so worried about
sources and methods? Well, because the source could
be one of these gremlin stations outside your back door and the
method could be eavesdropping on every single one of your
conversations, possibly even using some type of radar from
satellite based sources to appear into your house.
For crying out loud, 360 surveillance all the time.
That is the method it says. Ultimately, we are also working
with our partners to release as much information as possible
about the full context in which the data was gathered.
It is a time consuming process, but there are reasons why the US
government needs to protect these sources and methods.
There you go again. Sources and methods so that we
can't put them at risk. It's a little bit OCD going on
here. This whole sources and methods
saying that's what they want. Instead of saying sources and
methods, they could say power and control.
It's really psychopathic, this need for power and control.
They, they want it all. They want 100% power and
control. They want to leave you and I
with 0 power, 0 control. We're just going to be ants in
an Ant farm as far as they're concerned.
Recent reports of mysterious drones over New Jersey and else
elsewhere sparked a lot of public interest and discussion.
And I'm sure you and your Arrow colleagues were paying close
attention to what's your take on the situation?
Well, we know what happened. They didn't resolve anything.
Misidentification does account for a number of UFO sightings.
See that right off the bat he has to use this word
misidentification. Well, it must have just saw
swamp gas. Arrow has been working on
educational materials about common misunderstandings, such
as Starlink flaring, as we call it, or confusing visual
phenomena such as parallax. We're sharing that with the
public so they understand what they're looking at.
Yeah. Especially if it's some sort of
top secret program, whether by the by the deep state or whether
it's something that they're doing in collusion with these
things. They want to make sure that you
don't believe your own lying eyes.
Specifically with the New Jersey incidents, none of those were
reported to Arrow as being anomalous.
Well, you can watch the videos yourself.
They look anomalous to me. Certainly many of them were
unidentified, whether they were drones or airplanes or other
objects, they weren't behaving in a way that was identified by
the people at the time as being anomalous.
So we didn't take the lead on any of those investigations, but
we weren't in contact with a number of federal organizations
offering our support. What do these guys do all day?
Honestly, making, what, 160 grand a year plus insurance?
I mean, with all the benefits and stuff, they got to be making
200 grand a year, right? Half of them working from home.
Or at least a word before Musk came along.
What do they do all day? Offering your support?
Come on, it says. Do you have any advice for true
believers who are convinced that aliens are visiting Earth skies?
True believers? That's another one of these code
words means nuts. Yeah, the people that the people
that have seen something and are like, wow, that was weird.
I can't explain that. I guess it must be unidentified,
he says. I don't have advice per SE.
I don't want to be the thought police.
Oh, really? I think everyone, you don't want
to be the thought police, but you just told us that you're
going to educate people on why the thing that they identified
as an unidentified flying object was actually just a star link or
some kind of trick being played on their eyes.
But you don't want to be the thought police.
We want to tell you what to think about the UFO you just
witnessed. But I don't want to be a thought
police. I think everyone is welcome to
approach this topic however they like.
As I come into the subject, however, I try to approach it
without bias in either direction.
I'm open to any possibility. Sometimes an unusual event it's
just a sensor artifact. Sometimes just a balloon.
Oh yes, always the balloons. We do have some events in our
holdings that are really peculiar and I don't know yet
what's behind them. But because we don't know what's
behind them, also, we can't attribute them to anything in
particular, and that includes extraterrestrial sources.
Well, how about interdimensional?
Any closing thoughts, it says on your primary objectives for
Arrow. And how do you feel about the
big daunting question, Are we alone?
Says I it's, I'm a patient and being a data scientist, I'm also
a data hog. Oh, yeah, They like to hog the
data. Believe me.
They want, they like to hog every single one of your emails,
your phone conversations, video of you.
They like it all. I want more data, and I want it
quicker so that we can get to the heart of these problems.
It boils down to asking ourselves what type of data is
it going to take to prove to the scientific community beyond a
shadow of doubt that this anomalous phenomena was not a
sensor artifact? Isn't and is indeed something
truly peculiar, And I feel like it's going to require multiple
sensors gathering the same event from different perspectives at
the same time. Well, yeah, Don't you want that?
Don't you want recording devices set up all around your house?
My goal is for Aero to be able to enhance our national security
by increasing domain awareness. At that domain awareness, that
means just stand up, take a circle, look around.
That's the domain. They wouldn't be able to record
everything that's happening in your domain.
Ensuring that we understand everything that is operating in
space, in the air and maritime environments, as well as those
transmedium objects, Uaps that seemingly slip between, say, the
sky and the sea. Yeah, they want to.
They want to. They want to video it all.
They want to record everything. OK.
That's why they're protecting their sources and methods, power
and control. I think it's plausible that
there's life out there. I haven't yet seen the
substantial evidence I need to convince me that
extraterrestrial life has found its way to Earth as yet, but I'm
open to anything. Wow.
Yeah, well, that's your new guy at Arrow and you can see what's
going on there. They're bringing this thing out.
This is called narrative control.
It's kind of this old good cop, bad cop.
We've had the bad cop for a while now.
They're going to bring out the good cop and he's going to give
you a a spoon fed Pooh sandwich and you can either eat it or
not. I guess that's up to you.
Until next time, this is UFO warning over and out.