Hello and welcome to the program.
You have a warning in this episode.
We're looking at the Smithsonian cover-up.
That's correct. The Smithsonian corrupt and of
course we're talking about the Smithsonian institution has long
been rumored that this institution.
The Smithsonian institution has been covering up evidence of
everything from Giants to ancient societies to Egyptian
artifacts out of the Grand Canyon until we have some
evidence really being able to demonstrate that, they're going
to do nothing but lie. It was conspiracy theorist.
So I think it's worthwhile to take a look at what has come
forward over the years, shining a light on the Smithsonian.
That keep in mind, this is an extremely powerful organization.
If we look at Wikipedia, perhaps it says, Smithsonian institution
is or simply the Smithsonian is a group of museums Education and
Research centers. The largest such complex in the
world created by the US government for the increase and
diffusion of knowledge. Each.
Now that's something to think about first off, its not just
one Museum. This is a whole department
really created by the US government.
So it's one of these, it's one of these nongovernmental
organizations. Now almost seems like one of
these monsters, that's created where it has the power in the
funding of the government, some level, but none of the
responsibilities it says it was created for the increase and
diffusion of knowledge. That's Arguable.
We think about the fact that they have 153 million things
locked away in their Museum. And only one percent of those
are on display. According to this recent video,
I watched it says the largest such complex in the world
created by the US government for the increase and diffusion of
knowledge. Founded on August 10th, 1846 it
operates as a trust instrumentality and is not
formally a part of any, three, branches of the federal
government. So how does that Work.
You have this giant organization created by the federal
government in 1846. They got an early start but it's
not formally a part of any three branches.
In other words, it has no oversight.
The institution is named after its founding donor British
scientist, Jim Smithson. Didn't we just have a big giant
war with them and like, eighteen twelve to eighteen what 14 or
something. It was originally organized as
United States national museum, but that can't, but that name
cease to exist administratively in 1967.
Interesting, originally known as the United States national
museum, so see how they're moving it away.
So apparently this British guy for whatever reason, decided,
hey, these Yankees, they need their own museum, good on him.
So he gives him all this money. He built this Museum and he
calls it the United States national museum.
Here you go guys. Here's your own National Museum,
but 1967, so that would have been white Under.
Johnson. If you're old enough to remember
him 1967 to the Smithsonian, it looks like you're taking it
further out of control of the US government.
It says called the nation's attic for its electric Holdings
of 154 million items, the institution is 19, museums 21,
libraries nine, research centers, and Zoo include
historical, and Architectural, landmarks 19, museums 21
libraries Nine research centers and Zoo include historical
architectural landmarks mostly located in Washington.
D.c. how convenient, you know if this was a nation's Museum,
wouldn't it have been more Equitable to have these things,
located around the country, regionally additional
facilities, located Maryland, New York and Virginia more than
200 institutions and museums and 45 States Puerto Rico, Panama
City and Affiliates institution Publications, including Estonian
and airspace magazines. Sounds like all the good stuff
is right there in d.c. Maybe New York and Virginia,
right? That little power center and
then we'll throw out some of the smaller outlets at, you know, in
a big city near you. Almost of the is almost all of
the institutions 30 million annual visitors are admitted
without charge. The exception being
cooper-hewitt, Smithsonian design Museum, which charges an
admission fee. Its annual budget is around.
1.25 billion dollars with two-thirds coming from annual
federal Appropriations. So they're getting what 650
million dollars in taxpayer money, but they charge you to
come in and you and and look around.
Other funding comes from the institutions endowment private,
and corporate contributions membership, dues and earned
retail considerations and Licensing Revenue.
As of 2021, the institutions endowment had a Value of about
5.4 billion dollars. So the Smithsonian institution
here has an annual budget of 1.25 billion.
What on Earth could be spending a lot of money on and an
endowment of 5.4 billion. In many ways.
The origin, the Smithsonian institution can be traced to a
group of Washington citizens. Do being impressed with the
importance of forming. An association for promoting
useful knowledge. Met on June 28. 1816 to
establish the Columbia Institute for the promotion of Arts and
Sciences. Offices were elected in October
18, 16 and the organization was granted a charter by Congress on
April 20th 1818. It says this Charter expired, in
1838 remember, so understand back when the country was first,
created, the founding fathers did not want corporations to
last forever. Most of them had like a most a
99 year lifespan. They were afraid that
corporations would just spread like cancer and take over the
economy and Society the same way that they seen Hudson Bay
Company do with so much Commerce that that happened in the UK.
They didn't want that. They wanted competition.
They wanted new businesses spring up constantly.
They wanted vibrant growing Grassroots type economy.
They did not want all these corporations and what?
Now we're at the point where not only do these corporations And
Charters last forever, okay? They're just giving permission
to run wild but they're given all the rights and privileges of
a human being even though they're an inanimate object but
you can't lock them up. Okay.
Yeah. Maybe you could lock up the
corporate, you know, members or whatever.
But the thing is today, what has been created with these
corporations to Charters is exactly the opposite of what the
founding fathers wanted. And it has bared the really evil
fruit that they have. So when people say we're in a
capitalist Society or whatever, really not, it's more of an
oligarchy or mercantil Society, because you can't have a truly
free country economically or socially, where you have these
inanimate, inanimate and corporations that are
Incorporated forever, people don't live forever Corporation
shouldn't live forever. I mean it's through these
Charter so you kind of see what's going on.
You see how much things have changed?
You begin to see her to 1816. They're starting to build walls
walls around knowledge, keep it from that common people.
So there's always been those kind of people among us the kind
of people that want to compartmentalize protect and
keep knowledge to themselves. The people that are prone to
these secret societies, they had no need of secret societies
anymore because they've thrown off the change of the monarchy
but they want to stay at those old ways.
Tell our secrets and dark rooms nobody else can listen to us the
Institute. Proposed a number of inter
takings these included, the study of plant From the creation
of Botanical Garden on the capitol mall examination, the
country's mineral production Improvement in the management
care of livestock, and the writing of topographical and
statistical History of the United States reports already
published periodically to share this knowledge with the greater
public, but due to a lack of funds.
This initially did not occur The Institute first met and blige's
hotel later in the treasury Department and City Hall before
being assigned. A permanent home in 1824 and the
Capitol building. So, you see this group of
people, Injecting themself into the governmental process
beginning in 1825 weekly settings were arranged, then it
goes on talks about how the slow group grew the museum contains.
Specimens says zoology body in archaeology and fossils and then
it says into the institute's charter expired, in 1838,
because back, then thinks did expire.
But a spirit lived on, in the National Institution, founded in
1842, right back at it, with a mission, to promote science and
useful arts, and to establish a national museum of natural
history. Then it goes on.
It says British scientist. James Smithson live from eight
1765, 219 to 1829. Well, if most of his wealth to
his nephew Henry, James Hungerford when huntford dial
died childless in 1835, the estate passed to the United
States of America to found at Washington under the name of the
Smithsonian Institute and establishment for the increase
and diffusion of knowledge among men and accordance with the
smithsonian's will Congress officially Opted, the Legacy
bequeathed to the nation and pledge, the faith of the United
States, to the charitable Trust on July 1st, 1836.
So, you know, you have a rich guy.
He's got this idea for this grant Museum and because he's
rich and because he put some money out there.
People in government, see an opportunity really, I think to
enrich themselves off this whole operation and they're like, sure
we're behind this the American Diplomat.
Richard Rush was dispatched to England where President Andrew
Jackson to collect the request Rush returned in August. 18:38
with 105 sacs. Containing 100 4960 gold,
sovereigns. That's how they did it back.
Then they weren't using Bitcoin. This is approximately 500,000
dollars at the time, which is equivalent to 14 million dollars
and 2022 or equivalent to 10 million pounds in 2021.
However, with considering the GDP of the time, it may be more
comparable to 220 million in the Year, 2007.
Yeah, I'm going to go with the quarter billion figure.
Look 14 million dollars. Look at the time.
They lived in. Once the money was in hand,
eight years of congressional haggling and sued over how to
interpret smithsonian's rather vague mandate.
So they had a big argument about this for eight years and that's
just finally, Massachusetts representing former President,
John Quincy Adams. Persuaded Congress to restore
the Lost funds with interest and despite designs on the money for
other purposes. Convinced his colleagues to
preserve it for an institution of service and learning.
So even though they went to England, they got all this money
Jackson apparently was trying to outsmart em.
He's like, yeah, I'll spring this money back and we'll get
her out of that. One in the future.
I think we'll just hang onto this 220 million dollars.
It says through the smithsonian's for a secretary
Joseph Henry Joseph Henry one of the institution to be a center
for scientific research that also became a depository for
various Washington and US Government collections.
So there you go a place to put all the cool stuff at the United
States, exploring Expedition by the US Navy, circumnavigated the
globe between 1838 in 1842, The Voyage, amassed thousands of
animal specimens and herbarium of 50,000, plant specimens and
This shell and minerals. And it goes on talks, a little
bit about the buildings and how the whole thing set up.
So you can see what we're dealing with here is a massive,
massive organization 5.4 billion dollar endowment that was a year
ago. Certainly more than that now
Started by private individuals funded by a very wealthy, man.
Third time inherited money from from the UK.
And they really even though they operate under the protection of
the US government, I don't think you can send these guys a foia,
it's like the ultimate Outsourcing, the ultimate Black
Op, in my opinion. And so with they have 153
million different items stored there.
And when people frequently ask to see one that what they're
told is, you get to see these on a need-to-know basis and you
don't have a need to know. So how can this be a good idea
to take 153 million exhibits and put them out of the reach of the
average person that would be like closing of your local
library up and telling you, the only way you can look at it as
if you are a researcher. Why can't they photograph this
stuff? Digitize it and put a
description of it online. How hard would that be?
So, let's take a look at this next article as we delve into
this notion of whether or not the Smithsonian institution is
involved in massive cover-ups. So we've established that the
Smithsonian institution has an endowment of 5.4 billion
dollars. It was started by private
individuals, it somehow got completely intertwined with our
own government. It's got a budget would be say,
over a billion dollars a year. It has 153 million specimens
held within its within his buildings 153 million.
Only one percent of those are on display.
So that means 1% of that 153 million is available for the
public to say sort of 153 million different items that
they have. You can't see about a hundred
and fifty one and a half million of them.
That should tell you something. 99% of the stuff is hidden.
It's like an iceberg just too, right.
We're still an iceberg. We just see the top. 1% is all
we can see. So they have it in my opinion.
Done a lot to a build trust with the public, as far as what they
have. And what?
If they're hiding and I could get into lots of Articles where
they are, accused of hiding everything from, you know,
Bigfoot carcasses to Giants to, like I said, Egyptian artifacts
found in the Grand Canyon. We can look at some of those
stories individually later. But today, I just want to lay
the groundwork we see from just an open, you know, considered
not even, not even a politically inclined Source.
Well, at least not to the, not to the conspiracy oriented side.
I'd Wikipedia, they're pretty mainstream, right?
And that's where they're telling us how much these guys are
worth, how much how many assets they have.
We went through all that stuff. It's a huge, huge organization,
and it's this very strange hybrid organization.
Now, this article here is from abc27.com.
This is an ABC News. Affiliate, I'm presuming, if
says, and presswire by news Maddox, and this is dated August
31st. 20 22, it says recent Court, ruling nationalizes.
The once private Smithsonian institution, creating conflict
with the separation of powers Doctrine and the public meetings
act this is something I wasn't aware of I guess with all the
all the stuff from the last, you know, giant flu influenza
outbreak. We had was distracting but
during that time, it says your August thirty first, twenty
twenty two recent Court ruling National Eliza's the once
private Smithsonian institution, creating conflict with the
separation of powers Doctrine, and the public meetings act,
this is going to be interesting Manhattan, New York, United
States August, 31st 2022, Congress in 1836, became the
trustee of James smithsonian's, Fortune in Gold, the gold over a
half, a million dollars in yesterday's dollars was the
equivalent of millions and today's money and we said as
much as two hundred twenty million dollars, this private
Fortune to be held in trust by Congress to create the That to
create the Smithsonian institution was immediately
Borrowed by Congress. At 6 percent interest, nearly a
decade him. The more things change, the
more, they stay the same. Nearly a decade.
Later Congress, finally started to build the Smithsonian and
1846 with the interest that they owed on the bar old, gold from
the late British subject, and benefactor James.
Smithson James Smithson Congress.
Appointed a border regions to oversee, the Fulfillment of the
will of James Smithson to establish in Washington
Institute. Tushin for the increase and
diffusion of knowledge quote-unquote and to oversee the
business of the Smithsonian institution, the Board of
Regents made up of unpaid, appointees, including the vice
president, the chief justice as the Smithsonian Chancellor,
three members of the house, and three members of the Senate and
members of the public is one of the most secretive, governing
boards in Washington. D.c., imagine that when that be
a good place to hide, UFOs, they never had to hold.
Open transparent public beatings were the beneficiaries the
taxpayers. Or the Press could witness how
the never intended hundreds of millions of appropriated,
taxpayer funds would be distributed or even comment
because the Smithsonian institution was simply a
private, trust not subject to the federal laws like open
meetings Acts or even the Freedom of Information Act.
Wow, that's what I would qualify as a run-on sentence.
So, in other words, they get all the funding from the government.
They get all the benefits of being a government agency and
then they have none of the responsibilities.
Just like I said, with the Operations we have today.
All the benefits of being a person or being an inanimate
object along the way, the government creep and legal,
confusion initiated unintended Appropriations.
Okay, this is called giving benefit of the doubt to the
corrupt actors. Okay, government creep and
legal, confusion, initiated unintended Appropriations.
Let's just, that's where I see the conspiracy at people.
Create these, ill-defined organizations.
So they can do things with them that they couldn't normally do,
like hide all the really cool stuff.
They find something that's been studied as first Secretary
warned about back in 1848. Secretary Joseph Henry wrote in
the Missoni is in the smithsonian's charter that the
government of the United States is merely a trustee to carry out
the design of the testator. The institution is not a
national establishment as frequently supposed but the
establishment of an individual and an is to bear and
perpetuate, his name Henry's warnings fell on deaf ears after
his death. Look, you don't get that much
money from the government without the government telling
you what to do. You can't even, you can't even
start a business in your town without a license in most
places. I mean, you're using their
streets, you're going to pay their taxes.
So that notion that these guys could come in and put up this
multi-billion dollar operation and have zero accountability to
the American people. I think it's arrogant today over
170 years, later the consequences of ignorance have
corrupted the ones clear Divide and separate private
institution. I don't think it was ever
clearly defined honestly or separate so much.
So in fact that in the 2018 Federal Court ruling case,
number 117, CV, 0 to 1 for 0, t and M, and the District Court of
the District of Columbia judge Trevor McFadden, legislating
From the Bench. Siding no laws created new law.
Going to the extreme of ignoring the original Smithsonian Charter
by nationalizing the institution to deprive artist, Julian Raven
of his First Amendment rights of free speech, sounds like this
guy kind of falls on the side of the Smithsonian, to me,
McFadden's invented, ratification Theory, ignored
chief justice Taft and Warren Burger.
Declaring the Smithsonian is not and has never been a government
Bureau. It is a private organization
under the guardianship of the government, you know, that
sounds like, that sounds like nonsense to me.
I mean, I don't find, I don't find anywhere in the
Constitution, that that's really a thing.
Is it? Someone can correct me if I'm
wrong, disregarding the wisdom of Of Chief Justice's McFadden
nationalized. The Smithsonian ruling that even
if the increase and diffusion of knowledge was originally, a
private goal, Congress ratified. It look, it's nationalized.
It was nationalised a minute. They sent the gold over here and
1814 or whatever. The United States government had
possession of that gold to the extent that they borrowed it.
So you know what too bad. So sad they nationalized it, I
think that's awesome. The nationalizing of the
private, trust into a federal agency replaced, private free
speech with government speech, deciding Ravens, speech claim
because when the government speaks the First Amendment, Free
Speech Clause does not limit what it says.
Wow, the Smithsonian is no longer a misunderstood
quasi-governmental organization, but a government institution
through and through, well, they're not acting like it
McFadden's. Legislation went as far as to
claim that the Messiah at the Smithsonian Board of Regents was
politically accountable to the electorate.
Good, can you remember when you voted for anyone on any value
sets on the Board of Regents? Not even the separation of
powers could prevent the magical ruling from blending, the three
separate branches of government who sit at the table of the
Board of Regents. Because now, the government
Agency was like an ancient, Greek three-headed.
Well, hellhound by the name of Serbia's, according to mr.
McFadden's words, voice guy. He's really got his dander up.
The new nationalized, status of the Smithsonian institution was
created has created its own set of problems for want for the
once a secretive Smithsonian Board of Regents, what do you
think, guys? Mr. Ravens latest reform
initiative. Invokes open meetings act.
I think that's awesome. They have to be accountable now
with which every government agency Should be bound in the
past of private Smithsonian entity, avoid scrutiny by the
public and the Press at their private board.
Meetings, been deliberating on how to spend the 700 million
dollars of at appropriate taxpayer dollars, 700 million
bucks. They get from the taxpayers but
they don't want any accountability they want to do
it in secret and this author because this goofball, he thinks
that's great. Apparently, the Board of Regents
at their discretion, would slide a copy of the minutes under the
door of the outside to the outside world, to examine
barring them from any kind. Comment input or objection to
their plan spending sprees. We don't need something like
that, okay, we don't need this Behemoth that goes around, I
just Scoops up every artifact. They can find and hides it away
in a locked room somewhere and then we're taxed. 700 700
million dollars kids that means out of the hundred million or so
people in this country that pays taxes, will you pick you kicked
in seven bucks to the Smithsonian last year?
And so for what they can stick their nose up at the Are tell
you, you couldn't listen to their meetings.
This is ridiculous. The Board of Regents has been
put on notice via letters on August 22nd 2022.
This included, the copy of ravens book, odious and Sir,
Cerberus and American immigrants, Odyssey and his Free
Speech, legal War, blah, blah blah.
He goes on and says the board's failure to act opening their
board meetings of public. And the Press will ensure
continued litigation confusion and violation of the separation
of powers Doctrine surrounding and Define the configuration of
the three branches federal government and the United
States. You know what?
I think. They're getting taxpayer money
either give the money back or open at the board meetings.
And if they refuse to obey the George, the judge's order, do
you, what you would do to anybody else?
Send Marshals over, arrest them, and put them in jail.
Until they decide that they'll do what they're told.
Julian Ravens, book, odious and Serbia, sin, American
immigrants, Odyssey, blah, blah blah.
Yeah. What a, what a Twist.
So here we have this giant mega Corporation acting with
impunity. Scooping up National Treasures.
All the way from, you know, the Grand Canyon to Newark city,
sequestering them away in a in a variety of vaults and basements
and building somewhere and then when a judge finally shows up on
the scene and says listen you are taking seven hundred million
dollars a year in taxpayer money, you've been using
taxpayer money for Generations. Your money, you were entrusted
to the US Government. Clear back in the 1800s and now
you're going to be accountable. You are going to be accountable.
You're going to have open meetings and what is this?
What is this? Smithsonian say, go pound sand.
So this is a, this is why people believe that the Smithsonian is
covering up things. When you go into a meeting with
your board, you lock the door. You allow no questions from the
public and then you decide how you're going to spend 700
million. Has been given to you from
American taxpayers and you slip the paper under the door.
Like you're feeding the dog that's not called transparency.
That is a recipe for conspiracy and yes I do believe the
Smithsonian is covering up all kinds of stuff and if they're
not covering up artifacts that don't agree with their
narrative, they're certainly covering up where they're
spending the money at because they're not telling us they're
telling us right here we're not going to To tell you that in
itself is a cover-up, a financial cover up.
How could it not be. Anyway, I'll put both these
articles on the buy me. A coffee website is always.
This is UFO warning over and out.