Hello and welcome to the program.
You have a warning in this episode.
We're looking at UFO factions. That's correct UFO.
Factions this article comes to us from the hill.com written by
Mark done random. Cop title is pro and anti UFO
factions and government question.
It wouldn't be the first time He starts article off, he says
shortly before the release of the second government report on
unidentified flying objects in as many years, dueling
narratives emerged in the media. A New York Times article pork or
poured cold water, on theories of alien.
Visitation, and the extraordinary technology alluded
to in a 2021 report on unidentified aerial phenomena.
So, of course, we have that report from 2021, we have the
videos, all of that. Where people said, hey we folk
are finally getting to suppose you're from the US government
but now they're back tracking and the New York Times is right
there at your pre bunk upcoming report from the Pentagon citing
government. Officials the times pointedly
down plate, recent military, UAP incidences foreign drones
balloons were Airborne traction. I have to ask you if you watch
those videos of Go Fast Gimbal and Tic-Tac that those look like
groans balloons are airborne trash to you a Daily Mail
article and contrasts truck. Remarkably different tone, among
several eyebrow-raising quotes, one source of sharply,
criticized her office of the Director of National
Intelligence colleague stating quote, they don't want to talk
about UAP because they really, really don't know what the hell
they are. The Daily Mail sources.
Disclose several key details about the report, prior to its
release, including the US. Government cannot explain more
than 150 UFO. Encounters reported over the
past year, 150 account. UFO encounters.
Yep, no explanation for it. In short competing factions
appear to be vying for control of the UAP narrative.
If this is indeed the case, history is repeating itself from
1951 to 1953 Captain Edward ruppelt served as the first
director of Project Blue Book. The Air Force's to decade-long,
UAP investigation group up, widely regarded as effective and
objective. Investigator manager was
genuinely perplexed by the UFO. Phenomena is recounted in his 86
book, Rupal frequently, found himself, caught between two
bitterly divided, factions will all through intelligence circles
Riverboat people had chosen sides on UFOs.
According to Rupal, the 1948 Air Force, intelligence assessment
came to the remarkable conclusion, that the uaap work,
interplanetary the report work its way up into the higher
echelons. The Air Force was kicked back by
Air Force. Chief of Staff General Point,
Vandenberg, for lack of hard proof, You know, you're going to
have, you're going to have trouble.
Probably getting her proof on a lot of these UFO, sightings,
unless you actually get your hands on the metamaterial, and,
of course, we don't know if they have that because they're not
talking about facing intense pressure to resolve the, you a
peek mangrum. Ripple broke the people on the
UFO project. Tried a new hypothesis UFOs.
Don't exist. Intelligence analyst rapidly
learned that a quick very quick Snappy.
It was a balloon satisfied to superiors easy to answer to
blood. Easy answers to perplexing.
High-quality you a put U AP reports that recognition the
feathers were stuck in caps Air Force intelligence headquarters
at the Pentagon as a result report rights many analysts
jumped on the Ana UFO bandwagon. At the same time, a stubborn Pro
sauce, Perfection remain convinced that the UFOs were
interplanetary space ships. Others weren't quite as bold and
just believe that a good deal. More, should be known about the
UFOs according to Rupal, those in the pro soccer camp.
You weren't a bunch of nuts. Crackpots.
They range down through the ranks from generals and thought
grade civilians on the outside their views were backed up by
civilian scientists. Beyond heated, disagreements,
the two competing UFO faction sought to influence the media.
Sounds just like the day, does not.
Rupal describes a two-part 1949 article on UAP that had
considerable effect on public opinion.
It was the Air Force officially reporting on UFOs for the first
time. Now, we saw this happen at 2021,
when these videos were leaked clandestinely Force, but when
they hit the YouTube and the national television networks,
you had a lot of people really started to say, hey, there's
something out there. Just like the recent New York
Times piece. The 1949 article casually
admitted that a few F that a few UFO sightings couldn't be
explained. But as Rupal wrote The Reader
didn't have much chance to think about this fact, Because 99% of
the story was devoted to the anti sauce with side of the
problem. It was a typical - approach of
note article started out by psychologically conditioning
their reader against UAP. By the time the reader gets to
the meat of the article. He feels like a rich full blown
jerk for ever thinking about UFOs.
This is so exactly on the money. We see this with so many
articles that even that I talked about the podcast, where the
articles Have to admit that the UFO was sighted or encounter
because there's multiple eyewitnesses, but then they
spend the whole entire rest of the article, trying to debunk
what people have seen. And by the time you finish
reading this thing, You have to wonder, what were the, what was
the point in critically Rupert was continually being told to
tell the media about citing reports that were sold?
Don't mention the unknowns with noteworthy parallels, or recent
New York Times piece focuses, almost exclusively on resolve
UAP cases. Importantly, it also offers
explanations for two, well, known UFO videos recorded by US,
Navy fighter, jets in 2015, citing Pentagon calculations
that I'm article states that the object in the video.
Go fast is moving at about 30 miles per hour, but if these
events are calculations are identified to those long
promoted by UFO. Debunker, the Pentagon has some
explaining to do. Well, there you go.
This is just more of your appeal to Authority that you see this.
You see this UFO traveling at super high speeds, but then they
come out and say, well, that's just an optical illusion.
It's actually, it's actually only going 30 miles an hour.
It says no fewer than four aviators including a fighter
pilot Airborne during the go fast encounter.
Agree that a key figure in the calculation is likely not break
a data. Remember this figures law and
lawyers figure. All right, if that number is
miscalculated, or otherwise significantly Off the Mark, the
explanation for the go fast video, put forth in the Times
article is invalidated well garbage in garbage out.
That's why I have is that the times and another video known as
gimbal an object appears to spin and rotate it.
Skims over the clouds, according to the New York Times horses to
Optics. Apparent rotation is an artifact
of a camera. Now, imagine that we've seen
this video, you can hear the pilots talking about it.
This thing is moving through the atmosphere.
No wings as it rotates, but we're to believe that somehow
that's an artifact of the camera.
So these aircraft, that cost, 30,000 dollars an hour to
operate with all this high-tech equipment, or unable to produce
a camera that can film a piece. Of trash flowing through the
wind. It creates an image that looks
just like a UFO interesting, but this is a remarkable feat of
misdirection. The rotation is a red herring,
the gimbal encounters fascinating because there's
noted aerospace engineer, Steve Justice explains the objects
travels at high altitude, but no discernible wings or means of
propulsion importantly, the Navy air crew of that wreck, that
recorded the video. Maintain a stable radar lock on
the object. In this regard, knowing the
distance between the object and the jet that The video allows
you a piece loose and Engineers like justice to establish the
UFOs perplexing lack of wings or obvious means of propulsion but
that's not all earlier this week.
I spoke with the with it. Senior engineer, intimately
familiar with Optical system, that was recorded a record of
the gimbal video. He explicitly disagreed that the
rotation observed in the video is an artifact of the camera
system, an active-duty, F-18 weapon systems officer who uses
the system on a near-daily basis disagree as Well, so who do we
believe? Respect the scientist at
off-duty, Weapons Systems officer.
I used to use this thing every day.
Or somebody behind a desk at the New York Times.
Perhaps most importantly for meticulous geometrical
reconstructions of the Gimbal and counter show that the
obvious rotation matches its flight path.
This is a particularly significant blow to the theory,
put forth. And the New York Times piece, if
the government stands, by these quick Snappy explanations of the
Gimbal and go Fest videos, it must show its work.
Most glaringly the Times article offers, no explanation for the
best known UFO incident, recent years and 2004 naval officers
observed the Tap object exhibit, extraordinary flight
characteristics of the coast of Southern California when
accounting for the position of the sun that day.
A video, the object captured by a follow-on flight.
Quite clearly shows a capsule shape, optic With No Wings
control. Surfaces are discernible means
of propulsion. Ultimately history, cannot be
allowed to repeat itself. The analysts now facing intense
pressure for answers. Let's not return to the
decades-long practice of force, fitting simplistic, unscientific
explanations on, Two. On to a highly credible, UFO
reports. Well, that that's just said
beautifully. Ultimately history, cannot be
allowed to repeat itself. The analyst now facing intense
pressure for answers, must not return that the decades-long
practice of force, fitting simplistic, unscientific
explanations on the highly credible, UFO reports.
I don't think I could set it any better than that.
So, this is where we're at right now with the upcoming.
Port at the Pentagon supposed to release about UFOs and someone
at the hill had the courage to call them out.
And tell the truth about what's going on.
We certainly do have Pro and anti UFO factions.
I would say Pro disclosure and anti disclosure.
He above X is hard for me to believe that these people don't
know, these things are real. I think it's much more likely
that they're simply trying to hide the truth from the public.
Until next time, this is UFO warning over now I think it's
much more likely that they're simply trying to hide the truth
from the public. Until next time, this is UFO
warning over now