1
00:00:02,900 --> 00:00:04,300
Hello and welcome to the 
program. 

2
00:00:04,300 --> 00:00:06,200
You have a warning in this 
episode. 

3
00:00:06,200 --> 00:00:10,500
We're looking at UFO factions. 
That's correct UFO. 

4
00:00:10,500 --> 00:00:13,800
Factions this article comes to 
us from the hill.com written by 

5
00:00:13,800 --> 00:00:18,300
Mark done random. 
Cop title is pro and anti UFO 

6
00:00:18,300 --> 00:00:20,300
factions and government 
question. 

7
00:00:20,900 --> 00:00:24,500
It wouldn't be the first time He
starts article off, he says 

8
00:00:24,500 --> 00:00:27,300
shortly before the release of 
the second government report on 

9
00:00:27,300 --> 00:00:30,300
unidentified flying objects in 
as many years, dueling 

10
00:00:30,300 --> 00:00:34,400
narratives emerged in the media.
A New York Times article pork or

11
00:00:34,600 --> 00:00:37,000
poured cold water, on theories 
of alien. 

12
00:00:37,000 --> 00:00:39,600
Visitation, and the 
extraordinary technology alluded

13
00:00:39,600 --> 00:00:43,600
to in a 2021 report on 
unidentified aerial phenomena. 

14
00:00:44,100 --> 00:00:46,400
So, of course, we have that 
report from 2021, we have the 

15
00:00:46,400 --> 00:00:50,500
videos, all of that. 
Where people said, hey we folk 

16
00:00:50,500 --> 00:00:52,800
are finally getting to suppose 
you're from the US government 

17
00:00:52,900 --> 00:00:55,500
but now they're back tracking 
and the New York Times is right 

18
00:00:55,500 --> 00:00:59,700
there at your pre bunk upcoming 
report from the Pentagon citing 

19
00:00:59,700 --> 00:01:01,700
government. 
Officials the times pointedly 

20
00:01:01,700 --> 00:01:05,099
down plate, recent military, UAP
incidences foreign drones 

21
00:01:05,700 --> 00:01:09,400
balloons were Airborne traction.
I have to ask you if you watch 

22
00:01:09,400 --> 00:01:14,000
those videos of Go Fast Gimbal 
and Tic-Tac that those look like

23
00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:17,200
groans balloons are airborne 
trash to you a Daily Mail 

24
00:01:17,200 --> 00:01:20,900
article and contrasts truck. 
Remarkably different tone, among

25
00:01:20,900 --> 00:01:24,300
several eyebrow-raising quotes, 
one source of sharply, 

26
00:01:24,300 --> 00:01:26,300
criticized her office of the 
Director of National 

27
00:01:26,300 --> 00:01:29,600
Intelligence colleague stating 
quote, they don't want to talk 

28
00:01:29,600 --> 00:01:32,400
about UAP because they really, 
really don't know what the hell 

29
00:01:32,400 --> 00:01:34,800
they are. 
The Daily Mail sources. 

30
00:01:34,800 --> 00:01:38,500
Disclose several key details 
about the report, prior to its 

31
00:01:38,500 --> 00:01:41,500
release, including the US. 
Government cannot explain more 

32
00:01:41,500 --> 00:01:44,600
than 150 UFO. 
Encounters reported over the 

33
00:01:44,600 --> 00:01:49,500
past year, 150 account. 
UFO encounters. 

34
00:01:49,800 --> 00:01:53,900
Yep, no explanation for it. 
In short competing factions 

35
00:01:53,900 --> 00:01:56,700
appear to be vying for control 
of the UAP narrative. 

36
00:01:56,800 --> 00:02:00,500
If this is indeed the case, 
history is repeating itself from

37
00:02:00,500 --> 00:02:04,100
1951 to 1953 Captain Edward 
ruppelt served as the first 

38
00:02:04,100 --> 00:02:08,100
director of Project Blue Book. 
The Air Force's to decade-long, 

39
00:02:08,199 --> 00:02:12,500
UAP investigation group up, 
widely regarded as effective and

40
00:02:12,500 --> 00:02:14,300
objective. 
Investigator manager was 

41
00:02:14,300 --> 00:02:19,100
genuinely perplexed by the UFO. 
Phenomena is recounted in his 86

42
00:02:19,100 --> 00:02:22,300
book, Rupal frequently, found 
himself, caught between two 

43
00:02:22,600 --> 00:02:26,200
bitterly divided, factions will 
all through intelligence circles

44
00:02:26,200 --> 00:02:29,700
Riverboat people had chosen 
sides on UFOs. 

45
00:02:30,500 --> 00:02:33,100
According to Rupal, the 1948 Air
Force, intelligence assessment 

46
00:02:33,100 --> 00:02:35,500
came to the remarkable 
conclusion, that the uaap work, 

47
00:02:35,500 --> 00:02:39,000
interplanetary the report work 
its way up into the higher 

48
00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:41,300
echelons. 
The Air Force was kicked back by

49
00:02:41,300 --> 00:02:43,200
Air Force. 
Chief of Staff General Point, 

50
00:02:43,200 --> 00:02:46,900
Vandenberg, for lack of hard 
proof, You know, you're going to

51
00:02:46,900 --> 00:02:48,400
have, you're going to have 
trouble. 

52
00:02:48,400 --> 00:02:51,200
Probably getting her proof on a 
lot of these UFO, sightings, 

53
00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:54,100
unless you actually get your 
hands on the metamaterial, and, 

54
00:02:54,100 --> 00:02:56,400
of course, we don't know if they
have that because they're not 

55
00:02:56,400 --> 00:03:00,100
talking about facing intense 
pressure to resolve the, you a 

56
00:03:00,100 --> 00:03:02,700
peek mangrum. 
Ripple broke the people on the 

57
00:03:02,700 --> 00:03:05,800
UFO project. 
Tried a new hypothesis UFOs. 

58
00:03:05,800 --> 00:03:08,700
Don't exist. 
Intelligence analyst rapidly 

59
00:03:08,700 --> 00:03:11,800
learned that a quick very quick 
Snappy. 

60
00:03:11,800 --> 00:03:15,700
It was a balloon satisfied to 
superiors easy to answer to 

61
00:03:15,700 --> 00:03:18,300
blood. 
Easy answers to perplexing. 

62
00:03:18,400 --> 00:03:22,600
High-quality you a put U AP 
reports that recognition the 

63
00:03:22,600 --> 00:03:25,200
feathers were stuck in caps Air 
Force intelligence headquarters 

64
00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:28,500
at the Pentagon as a result 
report rights many analysts 

65
00:03:28,500 --> 00:03:32,600
jumped on the Ana UFO bandwagon.
At the same time, a stubborn Pro

66
00:03:32,600 --> 00:03:35,600
sauce, Perfection remain 
convinced that the UFOs were 

67
00:03:35,600 --> 00:03:39,400
interplanetary space ships. 
Others weren't quite as bold and

68
00:03:39,400 --> 00:03:42,300
just believe that a good deal. 
More, should be known about the 

69
00:03:42,300 --> 00:03:46,000
UFOs according to Rupal, those 
in the pro soccer camp. 

70
00:03:46,100 --> 00:03:48,100
You weren't a bunch of nuts. 
Crackpots. 

71
00:03:48,300 --> 00:03:50,700
They range down through the 
ranks from generals and thought 

72
00:03:50,700 --> 00:03:53,700
grade civilians on the outside 
their views were backed up by 

73
00:03:53,700 --> 00:03:57,400
civilian scientists. 
Beyond heated, disagreements, 

74
00:03:57,600 --> 00:04:00,700
the two competing UFO faction 
sought to influence the media. 

75
00:04:01,400 --> 00:04:02,800
Sounds just like the day, does 
not. 

76
00:04:03,900 --> 00:04:07,500
Rupal describes a two-part 1949 
article on UAP that had 

77
00:04:07,500 --> 00:04:09,700
considerable effect on public 
opinion. 

78
00:04:10,100 --> 00:04:13,400
It was the Air Force officially 
reporting on UFOs for the first 

79
00:04:13,400 --> 00:04:17,100
time. 
Now, we saw this happen at 2021,

80
00:04:17,600 --> 00:04:22,000
when these videos were leaked 
clandestinely Force, but when 

81
00:04:22,000 --> 00:04:25,600
they hit the YouTube and the 
national television networks, 

82
00:04:26,400 --> 00:04:30,500
you had a lot of people really 
started to say, hey, there's 

83
00:04:30,500 --> 00:04:33,300
something out there. 
Just like the recent New York 

84
00:04:33,300 --> 00:04:35,500
Times piece. 
The 1949 article casually 

85
00:04:35,500 --> 00:04:39,700
admitted that a few F that a few
UFO sightings couldn't be 

86
00:04:39,700 --> 00:04:42,300
explained. 
But as Rupal wrote The Reader 

87
00:04:42,300 --> 00:04:45,800
didn't have much chance to think
about this fact, Because 99% of 

88
00:04:45,800 --> 00:04:48,000
the story was devoted to the 
anti sauce with side of the 

89
00:04:48,000 --> 00:04:51,300
problem. 
It was a typical - approach of 

90
00:04:51,300 --> 00:04:54,300
note article started out by 
psychologically conditioning 

91
00:04:54,300 --> 00:04:57,700
their reader against UAP. 
By the time the reader gets to 

92
00:04:57,700 --> 00:05:00,900
the meat of the article. 
He feels like a rich full blown 

93
00:05:00,900 --> 00:05:03,600
jerk for ever thinking about 
UFOs. 

94
00:05:05,400 --> 00:05:09,400
This is so exactly on the money.
We see this with so many 

95
00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:11,900
articles that even that I talked
about the podcast, where the 

96
00:05:11,900 --> 00:05:16,700
articles Have to admit that the 
UFO was sighted or encounter 

97
00:05:16,700 --> 00:05:19,800
because there's multiple 
eyewitnesses, but then they 

98
00:05:19,800 --> 00:05:23,900
spend the whole entire rest of 
the article, trying to debunk 

99
00:05:23,900 --> 00:05:26,800
what people have seen. 
And by the time you finish 

100
00:05:26,800 --> 00:05:31,300
reading this thing, You have to 
wonder, what were the, what was 

101
00:05:31,300 --> 00:05:35,200
the point in critically Rupert 
was continually being told to 

102
00:05:35,200 --> 00:05:38,100
tell the media about citing 
reports that were sold? 

103
00:05:38,300 --> 00:05:41,800
Don't mention the unknowns with 
noteworthy parallels, or recent 

104
00:05:41,800 --> 00:05:45,100
New York Times piece focuses, 
almost exclusively on resolve 

105
00:05:45,200 --> 00:05:48,400
UAP cases. 
Importantly, it also offers 

106
00:05:48,400 --> 00:05:52,800
explanations for two, well, 
known UFO videos recorded by US,

107
00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:57,600
Navy fighter, jets in 2015, 
citing Pentagon calculations 

108
00:05:57,600 --> 00:06:00,200
that I'm article states that the
object in the video. 

109
00:06:00,200 --> 00:06:03,700
Go fast is moving at about 30 
miles per hour, but if these 

110
00:06:03,700 --> 00:06:06,800
events are calculations are 
identified to those long 

111
00:06:06,800 --> 00:06:09,000
promoted by UFO. 
Debunker, the Pentagon has some 

112
00:06:09,000 --> 00:06:11,400
explaining to do. 
Well, there you go. 

113
00:06:11,500 --> 00:06:16,100
This is just more of your appeal
to Authority that you see this. 

114
00:06:17,300 --> 00:06:21,000
You see this UFO traveling at 
super high speeds, but then they

115
00:06:21,000 --> 00:06:23,400
come out and say, well, that's 
just an optical illusion. 

116
00:06:23,400 --> 00:06:26,100
It's actually, it's actually 
only going 30 miles an hour. 

117
00:06:26,900 --> 00:06:30,100
It says no fewer than four 
aviators including a fighter 

118
00:06:30,100 --> 00:06:32,700
pilot Airborne during the go 
fast encounter. 

119
00:06:32,700 --> 00:06:35,800
Agree that a key figure in the 
calculation is likely not break 

120
00:06:35,800 --> 00:06:39,000
a data. 
Remember this figures law and 

121
00:06:39,000 --> 00:06:41,300
lawyers figure. 
All right, if that number is 

122
00:06:41,300 --> 00:06:43,700
miscalculated, or otherwise 
significantly Off the Mark, the 

123
00:06:43,700 --> 00:06:47,100
explanation for the go fast 
video, put forth in the Times 

124
00:06:47,100 --> 00:06:51,100
article is invalidated well 
garbage in garbage out. 

125
00:06:51,100 --> 00:06:54,000
That's why I have is that the 
times and another video known as

126
00:06:54,000 --> 00:06:56,500
gimbal an object appears to spin
and rotate it. 

127
00:06:56,700 --> 00:07:00,100
Skims over the clouds, according
to the New York Times horses to 

128
00:07:00,100 --> 00:07:02,100
Optics. 
Apparent rotation is an artifact

129
00:07:02,100 --> 00:07:04,600
of a camera. 
Now, imagine that we've seen 

130
00:07:04,600 --> 00:07:06,800
this video, you can hear the 
pilots talking about it. 

131
00:07:07,000 --> 00:07:10,100
This thing is moving through the
atmosphere. 

132
00:07:10,200 --> 00:07:14,800
No wings as it rotates, but 
we're to believe that somehow 

133
00:07:15,000 --> 00:07:16,700
that's an artifact of the 
camera. 

134
00:07:17,100 --> 00:07:20,700
So these aircraft, that cost, 
30,000 dollars an hour to 

135
00:07:20,700 --> 00:07:24,200
operate with all this high-tech 
equipment, or unable to produce 

136
00:07:24,200 --> 00:07:27,500
a camera that can film a piece. 
Of trash flowing through the 

137
00:07:27,500 --> 00:07:29,200
wind. 
It creates an image that looks 

138
00:07:29,200 --> 00:07:33,200
just like a UFO interesting, but
this is a remarkable feat of 

139
00:07:33,200 --> 00:07:35,500
misdirection. 
The rotation is a red herring, 

140
00:07:35,800 --> 00:07:38,000
the gimbal encounters 
fascinating because there's 

141
00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:41,700
noted aerospace engineer, Steve 
Justice explains the objects 

142
00:07:41,700 --> 00:07:45,400
travels at high altitude, but no
discernible wings or means of 

143
00:07:45,400 --> 00:07:49,300
propulsion importantly, the Navy
air crew of that wreck, that 

144
00:07:49,300 --> 00:07:52,100
recorded the video. 
Maintain a stable radar lock on 

145
00:07:52,100 --> 00:07:54,100
the object. 
In this regard, knowing the 

146
00:07:54,100 --> 00:07:58,000
distance between the object and 
the jet that The video allows 

147
00:07:58,000 --> 00:08:01,000
you a piece loose and Engineers 
like justice to establish the 

148
00:08:01,000 --> 00:08:05,100
UFOs perplexing lack of wings or
obvious means of propulsion but 

149
00:08:05,100 --> 00:08:06,800
that's not all earlier this 
week. 

150
00:08:06,800 --> 00:08:10,000
I spoke with the with it. 
Senior engineer, intimately 

151
00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:12,900
familiar with Optical system, 
that was recorded a record of 

152
00:08:12,900 --> 00:08:16,300
the gimbal video. 
He explicitly disagreed that the

153
00:08:16,300 --> 00:08:19,200
rotation observed in the video 
is an artifact of the camera 

154
00:08:19,200 --> 00:08:23,800
system, an active-duty, F-18 
weapon systems officer who uses 

155
00:08:23,800 --> 00:08:28,200
the system on a near-daily basis
disagree as Well, so who do we 

156
00:08:28,200 --> 00:08:31,800
believe? 
Respect the scientist at 

157
00:08:31,900 --> 00:08:34,200
off-duty, Weapons Systems 
officer. 

158
00:08:34,200 --> 00:08:35,600
I used to use this thing every 
day. 

159
00:08:36,700 --> 00:08:39,799
Or somebody behind a desk at the
New York Times. 

160
00:08:40,600 --> 00:08:42,900
Perhaps most importantly for 
meticulous geometrical 

161
00:08:42,900 --> 00:08:44,800
reconstructions of the Gimbal 
and counter show that the 

162
00:08:44,800 --> 00:08:47,200
obvious rotation matches its 
flight path. 

163
00:08:47,300 --> 00:08:49,700
This is a particularly 
significant blow to the theory, 

164
00:08:49,700 --> 00:08:52,600
put forth. 
And the New York Times piece, if

165
00:08:52,600 --> 00:08:55,600
the government stands, by these 
quick Snappy explanations of the

166
00:08:55,600 --> 00:08:58,100
Gimbal and go Fest videos, it 
must show its work. 

167
00:08:58,300 --> 00:09:01,600
Most glaringly the Times article
offers, no explanation for the 

168
00:09:01,600 --> 00:09:05,400
best known UFO incident, recent 
years and 2004 naval officers 

169
00:09:05,400 --> 00:09:09,600
observed the Tap object exhibit,
extraordinary flight 

170
00:09:09,600 --> 00:09:12,100
characteristics of the coast of 
Southern California when 

171
00:09:12,100 --> 00:09:13,900
accounting for the position of 
the sun that day. 

172
00:09:13,900 --> 00:09:16,800
A video, the object captured by 
a follow-on flight. 

173
00:09:16,800 --> 00:09:20,000
Quite clearly shows a capsule 
shape, optic With No Wings 

174
00:09:20,300 --> 00:09:22,200
control. 
Surfaces are discernible means 

175
00:09:22,200 --> 00:09:25,000
of propulsion. 
Ultimately history, cannot be 

176
00:09:25,000 --> 00:09:28,200
allowed to repeat itself. 
The analysts now facing intense 

177
00:09:28,200 --> 00:09:30,400
pressure for answers. 
Let's not return to the 

178
00:09:30,400 --> 00:09:34,700
decades-long practice of force, 
fitting simplistic, unscientific

179
00:09:34,700 --> 00:09:42,400
explanations on, Two. 
On to a highly credible, UFO 

180
00:09:42,400 --> 00:09:45,300
reports. 
Well, that that's just said 

181
00:09:45,300 --> 00:09:47,900
beautifully. 
Ultimately history, cannot be 

182
00:09:47,900 --> 00:09:51,500
allowed to repeat itself. 
The analyst now facing intense 

183
00:09:51,500 --> 00:09:55,300
pressure for answers, must not 
return that the decades-long 

184
00:09:55,300 --> 00:09:59,900
practice of force, fitting 
simplistic, unscientific 

185
00:09:59,900 --> 00:10:04,400
explanations on the highly 
credible, UFO reports. 

186
00:10:04,900 --> 00:10:07,100
I don't think I could set it any
better than that. 

187
00:10:07,300 --> 00:10:09,600
So, this is where we're at right
now with the upcoming. 

188
00:10:09,700 --> 00:10:14,600
Port at the Pentagon supposed to
release about UFOs and someone 

189
00:10:14,600 --> 00:10:17,600
at the hill had the courage to 
call them out. 

190
00:10:17,900 --> 00:10:19,800
And tell the truth about what's 
going on. 

191
00:10:19,800 --> 00:10:24,500
We certainly do have Pro and 
anti UFO factions. 

192
00:10:24,500 --> 00:10:27,200
I would say Pro disclosure and 
anti disclosure. 

193
00:10:27,200 --> 00:10:29,900
He above X is hard for me to 
believe that these people don't 

194
00:10:29,900 --> 00:10:33,100
know, these things are real. 
I think it's much more likely 

195
00:10:33,100 --> 00:10:36,000
that they're simply trying to 
hide the truth from the public. 

196
00:10:36,200 --> 00:10:32,400
Until next time, this is UFO 
warning over now I think it's 

197
00:10:32,400 --> 00:10:35,100
much more likely that they're 
simply trying to hide the truth 

198
00:10:35,300 --> 00:10:37,600
from the public. 
Until next time, this is UFO 

199
00:10:37,600 --> 00:10:38,800
warning over now