Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode we're talking about Deep State mutes
whistleblowers. That's correct, Deep state mutes
whistleblowers. Now for all the talk of
disclosure and congressional hearings and the US government
and other governments wanting to come out and share the truth
with the public, we're seeing another side.
This article here is from theblackvault.com and it's
talking about John Greenwald's attempt to get correspondence
between David Grush and that deep state, talking about his
whistleblowing activity and how Greenwald has been shut down yet
again. The title says The Black Vaults
Appeal Rejected in Pursuit of UFO Whistleblowers.
Communications with ICIG In June of 2023, The Black Fault filed a
Freedom of Information Act request for all records and
materials submitted or communicated to the Office of
the Intelligence of Community Inspector General.
That's ICIG by David Charles Gresh in or around May of 2022.
David Gresh is known as a UFO whistleblower, and the request
aimed to obtain various forms of correspondence, reports, memos,
notes, transcripts, photos, videos and other documents
related to his communications with ICIG.
On January 5th of 2024, the Office of the Director of
National Intelligence, that's OD and I responded to the Black
Vaults request with a glomer response.
That's spelled GLOMAR stating that they could neither confirm
nor deny the existence of the requested records.
The ODNI cited FOIA exemption B3IN conjunction with section
1O3HG3A of the National Security Act of 1947 as amended
50USC3O33G3A as the basis for their denial.
This section of the National Security Act protects the non
disclosure of employees identity without their consent.
So they're saying well Grush doesn't want you.
He hasn't given consent to to release this stuff so we can't
release his communications even though of course he would have
been a public employee at the time.
Specifically, it states the Inspector General shall not
disclose the identity of the employee without the consent of
the employee unless the Inspector General determines
that such disclosure is unavoidable during the course of
the investigation or the disclosure is made to an
official of the Department of Justice responsible for
determining whether a prosecution should be
undertaken. The Black Vault appealed the
decision on January 8th, 2024. The appeal argued that David
Charles Grush had already publicly disclosed his identity
and details of his communication with the ICG through testimony
before Congress, public speaking engagements, news interviews,
and the publication of his complaint Through his attorney.
The Black Ball contended that his public availability of
related information challenged the rationale for applying the
cited exemption to the requested records.
So aggression has been going all over the place, telling people
that he knows a lot more but can't talk about it, implying
just like they've said here that he wouldn't care.
But what's the deep state doing? Well, they're going to bury all
those communications. The appeal also emphasized that
the release of the requested information would contribute
significantly to the public understanding of government
operations, particularly the activities of the ICIG, aligning
with the core purpose of the FOIA to promote transparency and
accountability in government. Well, the FOIA might promote
some transparency and accountability, but I think the
main purpose of the FOIA as it's turned out, has been just to
create limited Hangouts because they can control what comes out
to such a degree. Despite these arguments, on
February 21st, 2024, the ODNI denied the appeal, affirming
their initial decision. They stated that after a careful
consideration, they found no reason to overturn their
original response. The OD and IS decision to deny
the appeal highlights a lack of transparency in government
operations as it prevents public from accessing information about
the interactions between a known whistleblower and the ICIG,
which could be crucial for understanding Government
Accountability and oversight and matters related to UFOs and
national security. Well, I agree and that's exactly
what they don't want. They don't want accountability,
they don't want oversight. After all, we're talking about
the Department of Defense, and when you get right down to it,
the same folks that cannot account, or I should say will
not account for $1.55 trillion, half of their assets.
But they can't account for half the stuff that they're supposed
to be in charge of. Half their guns, half their
tanks, half their airplanes, half their buildings, half of
their bases. They can't account for half of
that. Then how on earth are they going
to account for correspondence between a UFO whistleblower and
one of their intelligence apparatus?
It goes ahead and gives a letter here that was written to John
Greenwald and then it says Mr. Greenwald, the Office of the
Director of National Intelligence received your
letter dated January 8th, 2024. We're in The initial January
5th, 2024 determination was administratively appealed.
We have determined, after careful consideration of this
appeal that our initial decision should be affirmed.
If dissatisfied with this action, you have the right to
seek judicial review in Federal District Court in accordance
with five USC 5524-B552A4B as a non exclusive alternative to
litigation. You may also seek dispute
resolution services through the offices of Government
Information Services, OGIS at the National Archives and record
administrations, blah blah blah. In other words, go # sand.
So that's that is the service that you get from your
government. That's what's going on with Dave
and Grush. You have someone like John
Greenwald tries to get to the bottom of it, tries to get his
communications between Grush and the deep state, and the deep
state says go # sand, you're not going to hear a thing about
this. Meanwhile, you have people like
Sean Kirkpatrick going out and writing letters and speaking
publicly without naming Grush specifically.
But you know, trying to, I think, basically deperson him.
Why not put the cards on the table?
Why not let us see the communication between Gresh and
this intelligence apparatus of the DoD?
Well, they want to keep you in the dark.
They don't want accountability. This has been going on forever.
Really. I found this whole article here
from thebbc.com dated August 5th, 2010.
Churchill ordered UFO cover up, National Archives show, and it
has a pretty cool looking diagram that must be from I
guess the World War 2 era. Somebody has drawn here of a UFO
that was witnessed. It says spotters often drew what
they saw and sent pictures to the Mod, so he would have been
probably UK pilots. And it's kind of a oblong saucer
shaped thing with lights all around it.
Very detailed description. Anyway, the article goes on.
It says the government took the threat of UFOs so seriously in
the 1950s that UK intelligence chiefs met to discuss the issue.
Newly released filed show Of course, This is 2010.
Ministers even went on to Commission weekly reports on UFO
sightings from a committee of intelligence experts.
The papers also include a wartime account claiming Prime
Minister Winston Churchill ordered a UFO sighting be kept
secret to prevent mass panic. Notice how they kind of shade
the language on that. The files show reports of UFOs
peaked in 1996, when The X-Files was popular.
The Joint Intelligence Committee is better known for providing
briefings to the government on matters relating to security,
defense and foreign affairs. But the latest batch of UFO
files released from the Ministry of Defense to the National
Archives shows that in 1957, the committee received reports
detailing an average of 1 UFO sighting a week.
The files also include an account of a wartime meeting
attended by Winston Churchill in which it is claimed the Prime
Minister was so concerned about a reported encounter between a
UFO and RAF bombers that he ordered it be kept secret for at
least 50 years to prevent mass panic.
Now when you got sixty 7080 year old men telling us that you
should keep stuff locked up for 50 years, they want that just
tells me that they want to make sure that neither they or any of
their children are going to be held accountable or or any of
their friends or the younger people in this apparatus.
As as one person I've heard calls this whole deep state
thing, the BLOB. Well, the BLOB there is
protecting itself. OK, 50 years is a long time.
They figure by then it'll be forgotten, and anybody who's
upset won't be around to be upset anymore, so you might as
well just say it's never going to be released.
Nick Pope, who used to investigate UFO sightings for
the MOD, said the interesting thing is that most of the UFO
files from that period have been destroyed.
Now, why would they be destroyed?
#1 and #2 do we know for sure they've been destroyed?
Or have they just been locked away, you know, in in a safe
somewhere? Have they been digitized?
Are they just out of reach? But what happened is that a
scientist whose grandfather was one of Churchill's bodyguards
said, look, Churchill and Eisenhower got together to cover
up this phenomenal UFO sighting that was witnessed by an RAF
crew on their way back from a bombing raid.
The reason apparently, was because Churchill believed it
would cause mass panic and it would shatter people's religious
views. There you go with the whole
religious landing thing again. This is second hand information.
It almost seems like they're using that as a crutch to try
to, I don't know, make excuses for possibly what their own
collusion with these things I don't know.
Reports of sightings of UFOs peaked in 1996 in the UK, when
science fiction drama The X-Files was popular.
According to the Files, there were more than 600 reports in
1996, compared with an average of 240 in the previous five
years. The figures for 1996 show 609
reported sightings of unidentified flying objects, 343
letters from the public to the MD's UFO desk, and 22 inquires
and questions from MPs. But by 2009, the MO D's UFO
Inquiry desk had been closed down.
The 18th followers, released on Thursday, are the ladies to come
out as part of a three-year project between MOD and the
National Archives. Why would it take three years
just like in this country? Why do we have to have meeting
after meeting after meeting with no actual real revelation of
what's going on? Why is it that John Greenwald is
completely denied for your request?
Why is it that we even Stanton Friedman, he talks about when he
was made FOIA requests and then gets page after page of black
dot documents or white dot documents I guess back then.
So you have this pattern of the deep state muting whistleblowers
even when these guys come forward.
It doesn't matter if it's David Grush, doesn't matter if it's
pilots from World War Two. They come forward, they tell
their story, they attempt to tell their story and they are
immediately shut down by the Deep State.
Whether that's shut down in their tracks as government
employees or whether that is, you know, 1520, thirty 4070
years on the information being held secret with these guys
refusing to release it. Oh, we'll release it in 50
years. Oh, we'll release it in 75
years. You know, it never comes.
Here we have a Kennedy's been assassinated, what, 60 years
ago? Still don't have the documents.
Still don't have it. It's it's as if this stuff is
just never going to be released. And you have to ask yourself,
what are they protecting? What could possibly be so
important that fifty 60-70 years on they're still keeping this
stuff secret? Doctor Clark told the BBC says
since the Freedom of Information Act arrived in 2005, the subject
UFOs have become the third most popular subject for people to
write to the MOD saying, please, could you release this file or
papers that you hold on this particular case?
What they've decided to do is to be totally open and to say,
look, we're not holding any secrets back about this subject,
We've got all these files and we're going to make them
available for available to the public.
And that's just about the biggest line there.
And now they just told you that a lot of this stuff's been
thrown away. In other words, you're never
going to see it. But at the same time, they're
telling you that they're going to be totally open and
transparent. 1 And that's the MOD there in the UK that really
know better. Here in the US, one includes
details on aerial phenomena prepared for a meeting of the
Cabinets Joint Intelligence Committee in April 1957.
According to a note included in the Red Book, the Weekly
Intelligence Survey, 4 incidents involving UFOs tracked by the
RF8 radars were unexplained. So here we are, you know, 60-70
years later, just starting to get to this stuff goes on, talks
a little bit about the spaceman documents.
It lists some of those, it says. Here's one near missile with an
unidentified object reported by the captain and first officer of
a 737 plane approaching Manchester Airport in 1995.
A mountain rescue team called to investigate a crashed UFO and in
Brewery Mountains in Wells in 1974, attempted break insurance
at RAF Rudlow Manor at Wiltshire, sometimes referred to
as Britain's Area 51. the US, the secretive desert military
base. The Western Isles incident when
a loud explosion was reported in the sky or the Atlantic in the
Outer Herbrides. The 14 minutes of missing film
related to the Blue Streak missile test launched in 1964,
believed by some to show a spaceman, A gambler from Lee's
who held A-100 to one bet on alien life, being discovered
before the end of the 20th century, and who approached the
government for evidence to support his claim.
After the bookmakers refused to pay out, the MOD said it was
open minded about extraterrestrial life but had no
evidence of his existence. While the files come from more
than 5000 pages of UFO reports and letters and drawings from
members of the public, as well as questions raised by MPs in
Parliament, This is why it's so important to Crowdsource this
stuff. This is why it's so important to
come up with our own information, because it doesn't
matter if it's in the UK or if it's in the US, you're not ever
going to get disclosure from any of these government entities.
The information is too valuable. It's at the very least they can,
they can convert whatever technological advances they
discover, they can monetize that for their own purposes.
They can use these technological advances to control society even
more, to psychologically and if necessary, physically manipulate
us. There's no way they're ever
turning it loose. And I think this most recent
denial of a FOIA request by John Greenwald asking for the
communications between David Gresh and this intelligence
agency just goes to show this. They're not going to tell us.
So we have to do our own disclosure.
Until next time, this is UFO Warning.
Over and out.