Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're talking about UFOs.
Fool me once. That's correct, UFOs.
Fool me once. Or as the old saying goes, fool
me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
Or maybe, as the former president said, fool me once, we
don't get fooled again. Yeah, I had to go there.
Now. This article is from
thehill.com. It's written by Merrick von
Rindenkauf. It's an opinion contributor says
dated May 1st, 2024. Title says the Pentagon is lying
about UFOs. Overall, pretty good article and
we'll take a look at this article and also look at some of
the spending that's been going on the Pentagon.
Why can't these guys account for what, almost $2.39 trillion?
Why can't they account for the parts to the F30 fives?
Where is the money going? And if we can't trust them to
correctly spend taxpayer money, how can we trust them to tell us
the truth about UFOSI think the answer is a big We can't Now,
the article begins here. It says Congress held a historic
hearing on UFOs last July. The hearing, which featured
testimony from two former Native fighter pilots and a former
senior intelligence officer, garnered A notable amount of
attention and interest not seen on Capitol Hill in years.
And one remarkable exchange, Representative Matt Gates,
Florida, described how his office received a protected
disclosure from Eglin Air Force Base, Florida regarding a
January 2023 UFO incident over the Gulf of Mexico.
After being stonewalled by the Air Force, he delivered a tense
on base reminder to the military about how authority flows in the
United States of America. The Air Force relented,
permitting Gates to review sensor data gathered during the
encounter. Now let's just unpack this a
little bit because I think this article is, well, it's written a
very hopeful matter. Things weren't resolved quite
that easily. First off, Representative Matt
Gates from Florida received a protected disclosure.
That means somebody at the Air Force that saw this thing was so
worried about what happened to them for reporting this that
they went ahead and went around the normal chain of command
directly to their representative, Matt Gates.
It goes on tells us that at first he stonewalled, which
we've been over this many times in the program about how these,
I believe, three different representatives, Gates,
Burchett, Luna, and I think I can't remember the last Rep that
went down there to to view this stuff.
And so they have a conversation first.
Like, no, you can't see it. Gates gets upset.
I can just see him. He know he's kind of a firebrand
and reminisce of that scene, I guess, where Jack Nicholson says
you can't handle the truth. Well, Gates was there to tell
them that he can't handle the truth.
Now they didn't give him everything they wanted to, but
they let Gates see, I think one or two pictures and they also
let him see, I believe some of the radar data and talked to one
of the pilots. So what happened there was they
didn't relent, not really. But what they did do what what
what the military did was they created a very small, limited
hangout so that Representative Gates could see a little bit of
what happened and then say, well, you know, I told those
guys how authority flows. And, you know, believe me, they
let me see what I needed to see. Not really just the tip of the
iceberg, who knows what actually happened here.
But he had the courage to go down there and demand to see
this stuff. So that's that's hopeful.
OK, goes on. It says.
According to Gates, fire pilots tracked down four unknown
objects flying in a clear diamond formation.
Notably, the incident occurred on a training range typically
conspicuously free of any airborne clutter.
In other words, these things don't care if we have planes
flying around. Still, imagery indicated that
one of the objects demonstrated capabilities that Gates, who has
served on the House Armed Services Committee for nearly a
decade, was not able to attach to any human capability, either
from the United States or from any of our adversaries.
Radar data, according to Gates, showed that the four objects
moved in a very clear formation with equidistance separation.
As Gates noted and further documentation confirmed, the
fighter jet's radar stopped working as a jet closed within
4000 feet of one of the objects. The jet's infrared camera
malfunction 2, requiring the pilot to take still images of
one of the unknown objects manually.
I have to wonder, did he just reach in his pocket and pull out
his cell phone and take pictures of this thing?
Why aren't we seeing them? Why aren't they posted
somewhere? And a case resolution report?
Boy, there you go where nothing gets resolved.
Published last week, the Pentagon's UFO Analysis Office
concluded with moderate confidence that the object
observed by the pilot was a balloon, likely a large
commercial lighting balloon. Oh, how about that?
He just saw these four balloons. I guess he thought they were
four objects. The radar picked up four
separate objects, but no. The military.
The Pentagon has analyzed this. They've resolved it and decided
that it was just a big balloon. This so-called explanation
insults the intelligence of any reader who takes a few moments
to review the details of the incident.
It did not convince the world's most prominent UFO skeptic, the
pilot sketch of the object described as akin to an Apollo
spacecraft. There's no plausible resemblance
to the design of any known industrial lighting balloon, so
even the skeptics can't, can't, can't use this, This, this
explanation is so toxic that even the debunkers that we see
rambling on the Internet constantly and I don't know how
they make their money. I guess it must get paid
thousands of dollars to show up on The History Channel as the
opposition. I called the Florida based
company that produces the high end commercial lighting balloons
alluded to by the UFO office. According to the firm, it is
unheard of that such industrial grade tethered balloons would
spontaneously float away. In a brief video, Emmy winning
lighting designer Matt Ford, who has used the lighting balloons
in question detail the sheer absurdity of the pentagons
explanation? Well, they're talking about an
organization that cannot account for $2.39 trillion.
They just shrug their shoulders and say we don't know where it's
at. So yes, would those same people
be able to lie to us about a UFO and call it a lighting balloon?
I think so. The Pentagon, astoundingly,
would have the American public believe that this seemingly
impossible event occurred 4 times simultaneously.
Meanwhile, the dual sensor malfunctions aboard the fighter
jet, one of which occurred only in close proximity to the UFO,
remain unexplained. So they pay, what, $100 million
for these fire planes and they just randomly malfunctioned to
where their radar doesn't work but their cameras don't work.
That's interesting, and it just happens to happen on this UFO.
Perhaps more glaringly, the Pentagon UFO Office does not
address how multiple balloons separated vertically by 1000
foot increments could plausibly maintain a very clear
equidistance, so they're the same distance apart the whole
time. Diamond formation at high
altitudes and strong winds aloft?
Yeah, 80 mile an hour winds, and these things are just floating
right along. Worse yet, the pilot described
the lead object as stationary or moving very slowly.
Given the approximately 80 mile per hour winds observed at
altitude on the day of the incident, the pilot's
observations are incongruous with the Pentagon's balloon
explanation. Gates has rightly stated that
the Pentagon's assessment is incomplete and does not reflect
all of the data I was shown. Well, their assessment's a
complete lie, Matt. Just like their budget figures,
It's missing all the truth. All the real parts are gone.
Gates also call for the public release of the images and radar
data associated with the encounter.
We can't do that. Their masters won't let them.
The Eglin incident, in short, serves as a microcosm of the
many observed and implausible explanations that the government
has offered up over the years for countless UFO instance.
Well, clear back to 1947 Roswell.
They're using a balloon excuse when the guy in charge of the
balloon program says you says that there were no balloons up
that day because the winds, Yeah, 80 mile an hour.
Yeah, they don't mind. They don't mind that the winds
blowing eighty 9000 mile an hour.
They'll still use a balloon excuse.
Why? Because it works.
It allows people to assume the position and normalcy bias.
It quiets the sheep. More recently, the Pentagon
released a congressionally mandated review of U.S.
government involvement with UFOs.
The report, which is riddled with basic factual errors,
emissions and a laundry list of historical distortions, leaves
much to be desired. Christopher Mellon.
Now I have some issues with Christopher Mellon because as I
recall, he claims he had some part of either handing off or
picking up those Tic Tac videos depending on parking lot.
So but old school, old school money, old school, deep state.
But he is bringing some stuff out there.
So whatever. The Department of Defense's
former top civilian intelligence official took the UFO office to
task in a scathing 16,000 word analysis of the report.
Among the reports many flaws is an egregious falsehood about a
rigorous scientific study that the Air Force Commission in the
early 1950s to look into the thousands of UFO reports that it
had received. According to the Pentagon's UFO
office, this report by the Battelle Memorial Institute
found that all cases that all cases that had enough data were
resolved and explainable. That statement is
demonstratively false. The study in fact characterized
as unknown fully 33% of the UFO case, is considered excellent,
that is, those involving trained or multiple observers and with
sufficient information to come to a conclusion.
And Patel employed a particularly high threshold for
designating A sighting as unknown, requiring a group
consensus among the evaluating scientists.
So in other words, they made it as hard as possible to even put
these things in the unknown category and they still ended
ended up with a third of them being unexplained.
The Pentagon's egregious representation of this analysis
is of light kind with its so-called explanation for the
Elgin Air Force Base incident. In short, the decades long
nothing to see here approach to the UFOs continues unabated.
Well, it's called gaslighting. It's right in front of you.
Yeah, the guy standing there at the bank teller with a gun
pointed at her. I'm not robbing the bank, I'm
just pointing a gun at you and asking for money, you know?
It's when someone lies to you straight to your face and then
claims that they aren't lying. It's a total denial of reality.
Sometimes this will create so much confusion in a person's
mind that they're temporarily stunned.
And in that moment of being stunned, the person who's doing
the gaslighting can just dump so much nonsense into their head
and almost put them in a brainwashed state.
OK, this is what's happening here.
They're attempting to gaslight the American public and they're
doing a pretty good job of it. So that's why evidence doesn't
matter to them that you could be looking at the UFO and they will
tell you don't believe your lying eyes if you do.
You are a conspiracy theorist. Now it goes on, it says
depending on its egregious misrepresentations of this
analysis is of light kind with the so-called explanation for
the Elgin Air Force Base incident and short the decades
long nothing to see here approach to UFOs continues and
abated critically. The Pentagon's public stances
contrast with internal Department of Defense documents.
For example, a directive disseminated last year by the
Joint Chiefs of Staff noted that the anomalous incidents are
occurring around the world, including an in or near the
territory of the United States, of its allies and its and of its
adversaries. So while they're lying to you,
they're questioning what's going on among themselves.
And maybe that's just this outer ring of this concentric,
concentric rings of individuals who know more and more the
closer you get. Maybe these chiefs of Staffs are
still on the outside, still trying to figure out what's
going on this very center small group who report, I think, to
the entities that are controlling these things in some
kind of attempt to control us here on this planet with unknown
objects exhibiting highly unconventional technology,
brazenly penetrating airspace around nuclear missile silos and
other sensitive military facilities, the American public
deserves truth, transparency, and far more analytic integrity
than the Pentagon's currently demonstrating well.
The fact is, you don't have to have a whole army to take over a
city. You just need one person to open
the gate, and we have to ask ourselves, who are the
gatekeepers and why won't those gatekeepers share the truth with
us about what's going on? Now, I wanna look at just a
couple short examples of what's going on with the Pentagon here
as far as our financial waste and incompetence.
Or maybe it's not incompetence. Maybe it's just corruption.
Or whatever's going on here. Maybe this is how they pay
tribute to the people that are really running things, the
entities that are really running things.
I have to wonder. I don't know.
This article is from the airforce-technology.com.
It says US Pentagon loses millions of Dollars Over
Unrecorded Loss of F35 parts and this is dated May 25th, 2023
Written by John Hill. The Pentagon does not codify the
accountability for F35 parts that go missing this most
advanced aircraft in the world. And we've got parts all over the
place that we don't know where they're at.
The US Government Accountability Office announced that the US
Department of Defense incurs losses worth millions of dollars
due to a lack of accountability over parts of the F35 Lightning
2 fighter jet program. The department owns a certain
F35 parts that contractors manage, but the Pentagon doesn't
account for. This is partly because various
DoD offices and contractors have not agreed on whether the spare
parts are government furnished property.
So what They make them. We pay for them, but we can't
have them. The lack of agreement effects
how the DoD processes lost parts.
It churns one stomach to imagine the amount of lost when we
consider the government expects to spend $1.7 trillion over the
life of F35 aircraft. 1.35, One point 7 trillion.
OK And what did they spend during COVID?
3 trillion. It's about half of what you
spent in the whole COVID subsidies and all that thinking
just imagine the massive costs are all the people that got that
got subsidy checks, all the checks they sent out to people,
all the money that businesses got.
I talked to businesses owners that told me they got you know
unsecured loans got just got gifts of forty $50,000.
So this, this one on massive over over 3 trillion spent.
The last I heard they claimed 2 trillion that was unaccounted
for. They think a trillion stole by
Russia, a trillion stole by China, who knows of about A and
here we go with this F35 program.
It's going to be over half of what the whole COVID whole COVID
thing cost of about a million lost parts worth $85 million.
The DoD reviewed the circumstances surrounding 2% of
identified losses since 2018. Oh boy.
The GAO says there's no accountable property system for
record that allows the DoD to monitor changes to property
records. Currently, the contractors have
this information. The government cannot manage his
own interest in this matter at all.
And then it lists the spare parts.
So they're telling you that you, the taxpayer, pay for the parts
contractors make him and hold on to him.
But the government's not allowed to have those parts.
They're not even allowed to know how many there are completely in
the dark. That's what we're talking about.
We're talking about deep state, these private entities, these
corporations that can't befoiled, that are just allowed
to run roughshod over the law, who are connected with
politicians and Defense Department personnel to the
point that they can do whatever they want.
This is the opposite of transparency, OK?
This is a recipe for fraud on a massive scale.
Yet you and I are supposed to trust these people when they
tell us that they have resolved the UFO problem.
They're lying to us about the finances, They're lying to us
about the UFOs. Take a look at one more quick
article and then we'll finish this up.
Now, I just did a quick search here and I got this article from
December 2023. It talks about a $1.9 trillion
unaccounted for. I think now it's up to 2.39.
But still the the the point's the same.
This is from the Colorado newsline.com.
It says the Pentagon just can't pass an audit.
Conservative lawmakers calling for cuts should start with
agency that can't account for 1.9 trillion, not the program
Americans rely on. Lindsay Kushkarian.
That's true. I mean if you want to bring this
country together and and it it kind of limits some of this
division between the parties, between people who consider
themselves liberal and people who consider themselves
conservative. Let's take some of this DoD
waste and spend that on things that we could consider
compassionate help for injured vets, help for the elderly or
the severely disabled. Things that we all agree on that
something needs to be done just as a a greater good for for
social, for the for society. I mean, nobody wants to walk by
and see a mentally ill homeless person struggling in the street,
but most people would prefer to help that person and get him
some into some kind of a safe environment.
Nobody wants to see an an elderly parent who has worked
their whole life paid into the Medicaid, Medicare system,
Social Security, all that be denied decent care or be sent
large bills from hospitals, quite frankly, because Medicare
no longer covers that. When they go in and talk to the
doctor, instead of them saying, well, Medicare will do this or
that, they're told, well, your insurance company won't cover
this, what they've paid into these programs for 50-60 years
and now suddenly they're dealing with an insurance company.
What did they pay for that whole time?
So there's a lot of places that we can agree on.
I think regardless of where you fall at on the spectrum, we can
all agree, I think that we don't want to get robbed and that
there should be accountability. And yes, we need a strong
military. But when they're unable to
account for over $2 trillion, questions need to be asked.
And we cannot trust people who lie to us repeatedly about the
money that we give them to spend.
That's my opinion. The Pentagon just failed.
It's law. It's audit.
Again. It says for the sixth time in a
row, the agency that accounts for half the money Congress
approves each year can't figure out what it did with all that
money. Half the money, half the taxes
that you pay go to our defense budget.
Does that seem reasonable to you?
It doesn't to me. For a brief recap, the Pentagon
has never passed an audit. Until 2018, it had never even
completed one. Since then, the Pentagon has
done an audit every year and given itself a participation
prize each time. Yet despite this year's
triumphant press release, titled DoD Makes Incremental Progress
Towards Clean Audit, it has failed every time.
Why would we trust these guys with UFO disclosure?
Why? Why?
Why did they have any part in this discussion?
Really. In its most recent audit, the
Pentagon was able to account for just half of its $3.8 trillion
in assets, including the equipment, facilities, etcetera.
So it's not just jet parts, it's everything.
That means $1.9 trillion is unaccounted for, more than the
entire budget Congress agreed to for the current fiscal year.
Just taking all your money and flushing it down a rat hole.
No other federal agency could get away with this.
There would be congressional hearings.
There would be demands to remove agency leaders or to defund
those agencies. Every other major federal agency
has passed an audit proving that it knows where taxpayer dollars
it is entrusted to or going. Yet Congress is poised to
approve another $840 million for the Pentagon.
Despite its failure, in fact, by my count, Congress has approved
3.9 trillion in Pentagon spending since the first failed
audit in 2018. Tens of billions have gone
through the Pentagon to fund wars in Afghanistan, Ukraine,
and now Israel. Accountability for those assets,
including weapons of equipment, is also in question.
It's not just the wars. It sees black projects.
It sees spatial access projects where people can't, can't see
them and it's just the absolute waste like we see here.
Well, we've got the parts, but we can't tell you how many they
are and we can't tell you where they're at.
It is the creation of a deep state to rule over us using our
own taxpayer funds. We pay in as individuals to do
this, it's assiduous. And then to think that we go to
these very same people who are enslaving us through high
taxation and just rampant fraud and waste, that those people
should be in charge of telling us what UFOs are, that those
people have the right to tell elected representative like Matt
Gates that he can't see what's going on with the UFOs.
That's why I'm telling you, you will never get disclosure from
the government, from the deep state, from any of these guys.
We have to ground source disclosure because even the
mainline media is now able to see that we are being lied to by
the DoD and all these other alphabet agencies, intelligence
communities about UFOs, that they're that they're just
continuing to to spew out lies in the face of overwhelming
truth and that is never going to change.
We have to ground source disclosure and completely cut
these people out of the loop as best we can.
Have our own conversations on our own websites, on our own
podcast, and look to our own experiences.
Is the truth not what these guys are telling us.
What we should be is suspicious of these folks at every turn, no
matter what political party they claim to, they claim to belong
to. Because if we can't trust them
out about where the money's going, then we can't trust them
about anything. Until next time.
This is UFO warning over now.