Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're talking about the double slit experiment
and UFOs. That's correct, the double slit
experiment and UFOs. Now, this stuff gets pretty wild
pretty fast, I have to tell you. But we're talking about quantum
physics. We're talking about the observer
effect and some of the things that I see that connect these
notions to the UFO phenomena. So often times I think these
UFOs are just approached as if they're some kind of a flying
lawn mower, you know, a drone. But I think it's way beyond
that. And I think this is important
that we have just at least some basic familiarity with quantum
physics, and then we can start to recognize the same things we
see in quantum physics. That's what we're seeing in
these UFOs. So I went to ChatGPT to see if
he could give me an explanation that I can understand about this
double slit experiment. This is one of the foundational
things when it comes to the observer effect and what's going
on here. It says the double slit
experiment is one of the most famous demonstrations in
physics, revealing fundamental insights into the light, into
the nature of light, matter and quantum mechanics.
Here's a breakdown of the experiment and its significance.
OK, says there's a classical setup.
First there's a goal, and that's to observe how particles or
waves behave when pass through two slits.
Now there's the steps involved in this experiment.
The first one is a source emits particles like electrons or
waves like light. By that I guess he means it's a
collection of photons, right? Now these pass through a barrier
with two narrow, closely spaced slits.
It's almost like a little like like a set of blinds there, but
there's only two of them. A detection screen behind the
barrier records the resulting pattern.
So if you got this barrier of two slits, you got the detection
screen on one side, and then you got the mechanism that's firing
the electrons or light waves on the other side.
Now here's the observations. Number one, wave behavior.
When light or other waves pass through the two slits, it
creates an interference pattern on the screen, alternating
bright and dark bands. So that's kind of what you would
expect. I mean, they're shining this
light at the screen, and there we have a light band with where
the particles go through, and then we have a dark band where
they're blocked by the blind. Right.
OK, that makes sense. It says this happens because
waves from the two slits overlap, either reinforcing each
other constructive interference or cancelling or cancelling out
destructive interference. That's a little bit of a
different way than what I thought of it.
I'm thinking of the blind blocking the light.
But what they're saying here is, is that you have two wave of two
waves of lights coming in through those, I suppose, open
spots, and they're either doubling up or cancelling out.
Now here's a second observation. Particle behavior.
When particles like electrons are sent through 1 slit at a
time, they form a single band corresponding to the slit.
Well, that's kind of what you would think, right?
But here's a quantum twist. When single particles like
electrons are fired one at a time through two slits, over
time they form the same interference pattern seen with
waves. Now that's crazy.
They're shooting them through these two slits and you would
think there'd be two lines, but there's not.
They do the same thing. The way that the that the waves
of photons, the way the light waves do, they either cancel out
or double up. So you have one line.
This suggests that individual particles exhibit wave like
behavior, traveling through both slits simultaneously and
interfering with themselves. But it's even weirder their role
of observation. If a detector is placed to
determine which slit the particles go through, the
interference pattern disappears. Hear that?
If a detector is placed to determine which slit the
particle goes through, the interference pattern disappears.
If we watch it, or we set up a camera to watch it, then the
particles act the light waves. They're making one line on that
screen, but if we set a camera in front of that thing to watch
it or a person, all of a sudden that interference pattern
disappears and they perform in what we might think of as a
Newtonian physics way. 2 lines blocked by the blind.
The particles form 2 distinct bands like classical particles.
This implies that the active measurement collapses the wave
like behavior and the particle like behavior just by us
watching it. These particles begin to act
like waves. Why in the world?
Key implications. Wave particle duality.
Particles like electrons and photons can behave like both
particles and waves. Now I can kind of understand
with photons because you know, photons what make up a light
wave, right? But the electrons, wow, strange
stuff. Observer effect.
The outcome of the experiment depends on whether or not the
system is being observed. Man doesn't that sound familiar?
All these UF OS people saying they phased in, they phased out.
Same thing with all the Cryptid sightings, Bigfoot.
And that so many times one person sees them, another person
doesn't. The observer effect.
Quantum superposition says before measurement particles
exist in a superposition state simultaneously traveling through
both slits. So they're saying, hey, before
they were measured they were acting like a wave.
OK, but then upon measurement they changed to a particle.
I don't know man, this is crazy stuff.
The experiment challenges classical intuition and
underscores the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics.
I'm not sure about this word. Probabilistic nature of quantum
mechanics. I almost feel like the smart
people here are tending toward normalcy bias to me.
The experiment challenges intuition.
Maybe it underscores what what does it under score?
What underscores the effect that a person has on observing their
environment? The person, the observer, the
human is changing their environment simply by observing
it. And this, this almost sounds
like some of that faith stuff that you read in the Bible.
I mean, this is this is at a whole new level.
I don't see that as a probabilistic nature of quantum
physics. Look, I read it how when
photosynthesis, and somebody can correct me if I'm wrong, but
they used to just think that that just operated at like a
Newtonian physics level. The photon hits the leaf and
then it races to the exact place in the plant that it needs to go
to, to convert sunlight energy into into sugar, whatever it
does, Fructose, I don't know whatever you call it to feed the
plant. But now they've realized that
there's a lot of different routes that that photon that
that photon could take, maybe, I don't know, like say a million
different routes, but only one of them is short enough so that
it provides the energy surplus. If it takes the other routes, it
burns up more energy getting there than it produces from the
sunlight. So that's a problem.
You would never have any plant growth because wow, if you got
all these different routes to compete in order to find the
correct one to produce the sunshine.
If there's a million routes, it only happened one time in a
million, right? So there's a way around that.
The photon engages in this quantum behavior where it takes
all of the routes at the same time.
Imagine that acting like a wave, I suppose, finding the route
that's most efficient using it, and at that instant then it's as
if the other routes never happened.
It's like time travel or something.
You know you're getting a million do overs so that you can
find the right one. That doesn't make sense to me.
So in other words, the plant that the leaf on the tree in
your yard at the park, it's engaging in the same exact kind
of behavior without you observing it.
So it can start out as a particle apparently, and that's
not going to work. So it has to convert to a wave.
It has to go to all these different, different routes to
find the correct place to go, to deposit at sunlight energy to do
the conversion. And then once that happens,
boom, it's as if it never happened.
It's as if it didn't burn up all its energy running a million
different routes. It just ran the one man.
It's mind bending, totally mind bending.
And it does that without me observing it.
But this year, experiment. Maybe it's because the humans
are involved in it from the get go it it seems to be dependent
upon the observer. Same thing with the UFOs.
So often times I think that they are dependent upon the observer
there, this connection between the person and the UFO sighting.
And if the person wasn't there, I don't think the UFO would have
been. That's why I think sometimes we
hear about people seeing these things, maybe two or three
people standing there and one of them doesn't see it at all.
My own personal experience I've talked about many times in the
program, coming home from the casino, three O clock in the
morning, what, July 5th, 2011, I turn on Coast to Coast AM radio.
There's like an hour left of George Nori, right?
And so I'm listening and George is like, and now to our topic
that we talked about earlier, UFOs.
And I'm thinking, oh boy, this should be fun.
I was a non believer, but it's super late in the morning.
I don't have a very nice cell phone.
I can't watch YouTube on it. It's 2011.
So I turn the radio on. I'm listening to George. 15
minutes later, I'm looking up at a UFO.
It's almost like this thing just appeared to me to be like, yeah,
here, I'm here. It's almost like I felt like I'd
conjured the silly thing in a little scary.
And you know, you've heard about Doctor Steven Girl saying that.
I don't know. I'm not sure I really want to do
that because you hear about these people being abducted,
taking all these crap. They have all kinds of horrible
things done to them. But there's some kind of
connection there between the observer, how it is that one
person will see these things and somebody else doesn't.
I don't know how it is that they're expressing themselves to
us, especially it seems like when they know that we're
recording them. I don't know, but I see a
connection between this observer effect that we find in quantum
physics. We know that the observer effect
is real because we've shown that it's real through things like
this double slit experiment. And This is why I think it's
important to have a little familiarity with some of this
quantum stuff because it's it to me.
It's the explanation of what's going on with these things.
The explanation is there somewhere, I'm just not sure
where. Let's get a little bit further
into this. I went ahead and I asked ChatGPT
to speculate on the connection between the double slit
experiment and the UFO phenomena, and it said
speculating and it did. And I think it did a pretty
decent job actually. ChatGPT says speculating on the
connection between the double slit experiment and the UFO
phenomena invites a blend of physics, philosophy, and
imaginative thinking. Here's how these two seemingly
unrelated topics might interact. Yeah, I don't know how they're
seemingly unrelated to me. They are so related anyway.
Says #1 quantum mechanics and advanced technology.
UFOs is advanced technology. If UFOs are physical objects
controlled by advanced intelligence, they may rely on
the principles of quantum mechanics, including wave
particle duality, superposition, or entanglement for propulsion,
communication, or invisibility. The ability to manipulate
quantum phenomena could explain the reported behavior of UFOs,
such as instantaneous acceleration, sharp turns, and
blinking out of visibility connection to the double slit
experiment. UFOs might exploit the quantum
observer effect, effectively altering their interaction with
our reality based on whether they are being observed.
This could explain why they often appear elusive or change
behavior when humans or instruments focus on them.
Well how be good old chat GP teens saying the exact same
thing I've been thinking. Maybe I'm a little smarter than
what I thought I was. Number 2 Interdimensional
hypothesis, Quantum superposition and parallel
realities. The double sled experiment
suggests that particles can exist in a state of
superposition, leading to the idea of multiple realities or
dimensions. Didn't we just hear about that
with this Google chip coming out and saying that they think they
may have contact may have may have crossed over into the
multiverse? Some UFO theories propose that
these objects are not extraterrestrial but
interdimensional transitioning between dimensions or realities.
To me that makes a lot more sense.
UFOs might be leveraging quantum phenomena to move through
dimensions appearing to blink in and out of our space-time.
You see the same thing with Bigfoot and a lot of these
cryptids blinking in and out. Consciousness and observer
effect #3 role of the observer and the double slit experiment.
The active observation influences outcomes.
This suggests a fundamental connection between consciousness
and physical reality. You know, maybe that's why the
deep state's always trying to keep us on their run, trying to
scare us. Maybe that's why the good book
says fear not. Maybe it's that fear they get
into us that that causes us to observe things that aren't
there, or causes us to observe things that aren't the way they
claim they are. I don't know.
Some UFO sightings include reports of telepathic
communication or the sense that UFOs are aware of the observers.
If consciousness has a quantum basis, UFOs could be interacting
with human minds or the broader quantum field in ways that
mirror the observer effect. Yeah, but how do we know what to
believe what he's saying? I do believe that there's some
kind of communication between whatever these phenomena
represent and some people I'm just I just don't feel like I
can trust them for non locality and UFO behavior.
Quantum entanglement quantum particles can be entangled,
meaning their states are instantaneously connected
regardless of distances. We'll have to get into that here
maybe in a bit, but that kind of goes.
There was experiments they've done was observer maybe in the
US, one in France, I think, and the observer in the US by
observing a particle in a lab in the US had an effect on the
behavior of a particle in a lab in France.
So how far away can these things?
I mean, how far away does this thing go?
Some people think this quantum entanglement can stretch across
the universe. Think about that.
That's some deep thoughts there man.
This principle could explain how UF OS seem to define known
physics, such as instantaneous travel across fast distances
suggestive of a faster than light communication or
propulsion. Well there you go.
What if they're on the other side of the Galaxy or the
universe and they're manifesting themselves here telepathically?
I guess you would say they're communicating a presence to us
and they're doing it by creating these crazy jumbled images
sometimes like the one I saw that look like this like I've
said 100 times. It look like this giant concrete
stool for big concrete looking legs.
Never forget the texture on the thing.
It looked like it looked like it'd been places the blue light.
Maybe they were maybe they were copying the cell phone tower
down the road pulsate on the top of it.
All these little things, I think back looking at, it's almost as
if this as if this super high intelligence had transported
itself from someplace else. It wasn't even there.
What I was seeing was a representative of its
intelligence. It was just grabbing things from
the environment to imitate. I think it's what could be
happening with these drone sightings in New Jersey.
They've seen a drone somewhere and they've just keyed in on
that and they're using that image to communicate with us.
And this is This is why we could explain why they phase in and
out. Who knows, the real intelligence
might not even be here with this.
It may be on the other side of the Galaxy, like I said, the
other side of the universe. Who knows this, these UFOs could
be nothing more than projections for all we know.
It goes on and says implications for UFOSUFOS might be using
entanglement to communicate or coordinate movements, bypassing
the limitations of space-time as we understand it.
Just think about that millions of light years away,
communicating almost or maybe instantaneously with us here on
earth. Scary stuff man.
Energy manipulation and propulsion.
Wave particle duality and propulsion.
If UFOs manipulate quantum states, they could be harnessing
wave particle duality for propulsion, converting energy
from riding quantum waves. UFO propulsion could involve
tapping into quantum vacuum energy. 0 point energy
exploiting fluctuations in the quantum field that are analogous
to the probabilistic behaviors seen a double slit experiment.
Well, they're using that term probabilistic again, and I'm not
seeing it as probabilistic, I'm seeing it as really predictable.
If the observers there, it behaves as that wave.
If the observers not there behaves as a particle, that
doesn't seem probabilistic to me.
That's the real thing that I'm seeing there is, wow, What does
the effect of a human have on this thing?
It'd be nice to know. I wish they would try this with
a dog. But then I guess a dog couldn't
tell us what he saw because you put a camera up, it records it,
right? I wonder what happens if you put
an animal in there to observe it.
I guess there's no way you could know If there was some way that
we, the dog could communicate with us is what they saw.
Wouldn't that be interesting? Speculative questions?
I bet you dogs can see him and I'll bet you dogs can definitely
have an effect on that observer effect.
I know dogs can see UFOs with people talk about it all the
time. OK, I'm off track.
Speculative questions. Could UFOs be manifestations of
a deeper quantum reality temporarily leaking into our
perception? I I think so.
Leaking. I don't know about leaking.
Maybe barging are UFOs leveraging principles similar to
those revealed in the double slit experiment to evade
detection or interact with our reality on their terms.
That's what I'm saying. If consciousness influences
quantum phenomena, could human perception and self play a role
in UFO appearances or behavior? Well, absolutely.
I think just like I said, I got my car that night, morning
early, I guess 3:00 in the morning, turning on coast to
coast, listening to George Nori, thinking how funny it was that
George could be so foolish to believe in UFOs.
And thinking to myself, yeah, I'll believe it when I see it.
And 15 minutes later I saw it. I almost feel like, I almost
feel like a subconsciously called that thing in.
That's weird, man. I don't know.
While these ideas remain speculative, they open
intriguing avenues for interdisciplinary exploration,
combining quantum physics with the study of UFOs in their
enigmatic nature. I don't know why.
I don't know why AI loves that word enigmatic so much.
I'm not a big fan. Would you like to explore a
specific hypothesis more in detail?
It says, well, sure, let's ask, let's ask GTP what it thinks the
odds are that people could call these things in.
So I thought, this is kind of fun.
We'll finish up with this last question talking to the great AI
here, ChatGPT. I asked ChatGPT if it thought
that humans could summon UFOs, and, well, I tell you what.
It's got some things to say about it.
It says the idea of summoning UFOs is a fascinating topic that
blends anecdotal reports, speculation, and esoteric
theories. While there's no scientific
evidence supporting the ability to summit UFOs, some
perspectives suggest mechanisms by which such an interaction
could hypothetically occur. Here's a breakdown of the
possibilities. Consciousness and Quantum
mechanics Observer Effect In quantum physics, the observer
plays a role in shaping outcomes, as seen in the double
sled experiment. If UFO phenomena are tied to
consciousness or quantum processes, human attention or
focused intention might influence their appearance.
Isn't that wild? Thought and reality Some UFO
researchers speculate that advanced intelligence could be
sensitive to or interact with human thought patterns.
Experiments in telepathy and meditation suggest that focused
intention might create conditions conducive to UFO
sightings. This is why I don't want the
deep state to have a monopoly on this stuff, man, it's not good.
Two historical and cultural accounts, Rituals and practices.
Indigenous cultures, shamans and Mystics have long claimed that
certain rituals or states of consciousness, Meditation,
fasting, chanting, can summon other worldly entities, which
some is interpret as UFOs. Yeah, some people interpret
those things as demons. Reports often describe these
encounters as responses to specific human actions or mental
states. Yeah, you get into a lot of this
weird stuff where people are taking these mind altering
substances that's down a road that I really don't care about
going down. We've talked about that here a
little bit before, you know, the clockwork elves and the
different things people claim that they use to communicate
with these things in the modern attempts groups like CE 5 has.
close Encounters of the Fifth Kind, founded by Doctor Steven
Greer, claim that UFOs can be summoned through meditation,
visualization, and focus group intention.
Practitioners report using laser signals, telepathic messages,
and peaceful intent to initiate contact.
Heard a lot of stories about people blinking lights at these
things. I think I'll hold off on that.
Electromagnetic or environmental triggers, It says.
Localized conditions. Some speculate that UFOs are
drawn to specific electromagnetic frequencies or
disturbances which might be generated intentionally, such as
radio signals or lasers, or unintentionally.
Natural phenomena. Experiments with signals.
Effort to broadcast signals into space, such as the Arecibo
message or Seti's work, aim to attract extraterrestrial
tension. UFO summoning could
theoretically involve similar principles on a smaller scale.
There again, you're assuming these things are all the good
guys and there are no bad guys. Psychological and sociological
explanations. Pattern recognition and
expectation. Humans are adept at finding
patterns sometimes exceeding UFOs in ambiguous stimuli.
Clouds like stars. A person deeply focused on UFOs
may interpret natural or random phenomena as a response.
Collective consciousness. Some theories suggest a shared
human consciousness might be involved with group intent or
collective belief, influencing reality in subtle ways.
While we saw that reality can be influenced by humans, the double
slit experiment proves this. Simply observing particles
versus the waves. Just observing that the human
observing that causes the particles to change their
behavior and act as waves. So yes, humans are affecting
their environment by observing it.
Just just observing it, nothing else.
Crazy sceptical considerations. Confirmation bias.
People trying to summon UFOs might over interpret
coincidental phenomena as success.
Natural phenomena. Many UFO sightings can be
explained by natural occurrences.
Satellites, aircraft, meteors mistaken for something
extraordinary. GPT is drifting off into
normalcy bias here. When you have one of these
things land in front of your car like I did, you're pretty sure
it's not a Starlink. Let's get that out there.
Hoaxes and misinterpretations. Without rigorous controls, it's
hard to distinguish between general phenomena from
fabricated or misunderstood events.
I'm not even talking about, oh, I saw something in the sky.
I'm barely talking about the one like my friend and I was non
believer saw where triangle craft looks like the size of a
fighter jet, flies over far too slow for a fighter jet while
we're watching it and takes a 90° turn or something and darts
off to the northwest doing something that a normal plane
can't do. What I'm talking about here
right now is the big ones, the up close ones like the one I saw
in 2011. That's not a star link.
That's not swamp gas. That's a giant craft that showed
up in the middle of the highway medium, just like, hey, here,
I'm I'm right here. No mistaking that.
I'm not saying I know what it was, but I know what it wasn't.
All right, we'll finish up your open questions.
If UFOs can be summoned, what mechanism would they use to
detect or respond to human signals or intentions?
That specific frequencies or meditation techniques create
favorable conditions for sightings?
Are these encounter subjective experiences tied to human
perception, or do they involve independent external entities?
I don't know. Maybe they're in another
dimension, which is like right alongside of ours or right
entangled with ours somehow. And these people bringing these
in or simply having thoughts like I did show me boom shown.
I don't know. Sometimes it's like I think if
people just haen to be in that articular state of mind to
connect with wherever these things at.
And I'm not saying they're good. I think that they're probably
good bad in the different and the ones that are bad are
probably really bad. That's why I'm not really
interested in connecting with any of them because I have no
way of telling them apart. But it does seem like they're
right there all the time and they can just show up anywhere,
which makes me think that they're interdimensional, just
on the other side of the wall. And sometimes a person is able
to engage that observer effect knowingly or unknowingly, as in
my case. And in that instant, there's a
connection in the same way that the person sitting in that lab
or setting up the camera on those electrons change the
behavior of those electrons just through their observation only.
Didn't do anything, didn't touch anything.
They changed the nature of reality around them simply by
observing. This deserves a lot more
attention, a lot more attention. Until next time, this is UFO
warning over and out.