1
00:00:03,040 --> 00:00:05,320
Hello and welcome to the program
UFO Warning. 

2
00:00:05,320 --> 00:00:08,840
In this episode, we're talking 
about UFO rods make a comeback 

3
00:00:08,840 --> 00:00:10,560
in Brazil. 
That's correct. 

4
00:00:10,560 --> 00:00:13,240
UFO rods make a comeback in 
Brazil. 

5
00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:15,200
In fact, they're all over the 
place down there in South 

6
00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:16,960
America. 
These things were really in the 

7
00:00:16,960 --> 00:00:19,880
news a lot a few years ago, so 
it's fun to go back and look at 

8
00:00:19,880 --> 00:00:23,640
what happens when we have 
another outbreak of sightings of

9
00:00:23,640 --> 00:00:25,080
these things. 
That's articles from 

10
00:00:25,080 --> 00:00:30,640
dailymail.co.uk. 
The headline says exclusive UFO 

11
00:00:30,640 --> 00:00:35,080
sightings over Brazil, Argentina
and Chile leave experts baffled.

12
00:00:35,200 --> 00:00:37,600
So the article starts off pretty
good, but you're going to see 

13
00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:38,880
that it ends up kind of in a 
rut. 

14
00:00:39,200 --> 00:00:41,840
It says luminous rods have been 
caught on camera over South 

15
00:00:41,840 --> 00:00:44,800
American countries. 
Videos filmed by residents in 

16
00:00:44,800 --> 00:00:47,680
Argentina, Chile and Brazil show
the UFOs. 

17
00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:51,000
And then it goes on and says 
it's written by Josh Boswell for

18
00:00:51,000 --> 00:00:55,280
dailymail.com, dated May 24th, 
2024. 

19
00:00:55,480 --> 00:00:58,840
Starts off by saying strange 
luminous rods have been caught 

20
00:00:58,840 --> 00:01:02,440
on camera in the skies over 
several South American countries

21
00:01:02,440 --> 00:01:06,640
in the past month. daily.com, 
dailymail.com can reveal. 

22
00:01:07,000 --> 00:01:10,640
The long white and blue objects 
appear to slowly float across 

23
00:01:10,640 --> 00:01:14,400
the sky in videos filmed by 
residents in Argentina, Chile 

24
00:01:14,400 --> 00:01:17,280
and Brazil. 
One stunning example was filmed 

25
00:01:17,280 --> 00:01:21,840
on April 29th by UFO researcher 
and Petro Boss, engineer Ronnie 

26
00:01:21,880 --> 00:01:26,240
Burnett on cameras he set up to 
monitor the southeastern night 

27
00:01:26,240 --> 00:01:29,880
sky near Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
And of course, Petrobras is a 

28
00:01:29,880 --> 00:01:32,480
big oil company down there. 
This first picture is pretty 

29
00:01:32,480 --> 00:01:34,240
cool. 
It has like this almost like an 

30
00:01:34,240 --> 00:01:38,480
aquamarine blue light. 
It's just a rod. 

31
00:01:38,480 --> 00:01:41,240
You can just see this thing now.
It doesn't look like it's 

32
00:01:41,240 --> 00:01:43,080
something streaking across the 
sky leaving a trail. 

33
00:01:43,080 --> 00:01:46,360
To me, it just looks like this 
strange illuminated rod. 

34
00:01:46,640 --> 00:01:50,080
An apparent cylindrical object 
glides into the frame at 5 O 

35
00:01:50,080 --> 00:01:53,360
1:00 AM, heading northeast and 
gradually moving out of sight 

36
00:01:53,640 --> 00:01:56,240
over about 80 seconds. 
So they're moving quite slow 

37
00:01:56,240 --> 00:01:59,040
actually, almost hovering. 
That says videos filmed by 

38
00:01:59,040 --> 00:02:02,360
residents in Argentina, Chile 
and Brazil show UFOs. 

39
00:02:02,600 --> 00:02:06,720
This particular video was taken 
in Chile on May 6th. 

40
00:02:06,720 --> 00:02:10,120
I'll put the links over at the 
Kofi site so you can watch this 

41
00:02:10,120 --> 00:02:12,120
stuff. 
On May 6th, a witness in 

42
00:02:12,120 --> 00:02:16,040
Argentina filming with their 
phone captured a similar looking

43
00:02:16,040 --> 00:02:18,480
white object moving slowly 
through the sky above their 

44
00:02:18,480 --> 00:02:22,200
house. 
The same day, at 7:14 PM in Vina

45
00:02:22,200 --> 00:02:26,640
Del Mar, Chile, a third witness 
videoed another incident, though

46
00:02:26,640 --> 00:02:28,800
this time the cylinder appeared 
blue. 

47
00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:32,840
Another video obtained by Vernet
came from a Chilean witness and 

48
00:02:32,840 --> 00:02:37,000
Lujan de Cuella. 
The same evening on May 8th, 

49
00:02:37,040 --> 00:02:40,200
residents of a Brazilian town 
near the border with Uruguay 

50
00:02:40,200 --> 00:02:43,800
filmed one that appeared to 
change color from white to blue 

51
00:02:44,040 --> 00:02:45,680
and yellow. 
Really cool. 

52
00:02:45,920 --> 00:02:48,120
This is another neat photo. 
Here you can see this white one 

53
00:02:48,120 --> 00:02:51,440
just just hovering there it 
looks like over over the city. 

54
00:02:51,680 --> 00:02:54,920
It says the same day as the 
Chile sighting, a witness in 

55
00:02:54,920 --> 00:02:57,760
Argentina filming with their 
phone captured a similar looking

56
00:02:57,760 --> 00:03:00,640
white object moving slowly 
through the sky above their 

57
00:03:00,640 --> 00:03:02,160
house. 
Know what they're talking about?

58
00:03:02,160 --> 00:03:05,560
These things moving snow, moving
slow, not moving so fast that 

59
00:03:05,560 --> 00:03:06,880
they that they come up as a 
blur. 

60
00:03:07,160 --> 00:03:09,800
It has a time. 
Here it says dated 4/29/24. 

61
00:03:09,800 --> 00:03:12,480
Time 5. 
O1 gives the exact coordinates, 

62
00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:15,400
exact camera direction, the 
object, and it has it. 

63
00:03:15,400 --> 00:03:17,240
Ronnie Burnett, he has this 
whole thing signed. 

64
00:03:17,480 --> 00:03:19,840
So he's telling you exactly 
where these things were filmed 

65
00:03:19,840 --> 00:03:24,120
at and exactly what time. 
Then one studying video was 

66
00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:26,800
filmed in Brazil. 
Often a string of lights about 

67
00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:29,720
as bright as stars, moving 
slowly across the sky will be 

68
00:03:29,720 --> 00:03:33,160
mistaken for a true UFO when it 
is in fact Starlight. 

69
00:03:33,520 --> 00:03:36,600
So here's where they start to 
put the poison and the porridge.

70
00:03:37,080 --> 00:03:40,040
Now, we've been having a nice 
conversation about Roz, showing 

71
00:03:40,040 --> 00:03:44,120
us pictures describing how they 
very slowly move across the sky.

72
00:03:44,520 --> 00:03:47,640
And now they want to throw in 
the Starlink boogeyman. 

73
00:03:48,000 --> 00:03:50,320
Listen, you can look at these 
pictures of these rods. 

74
00:03:50,560 --> 00:03:52,840
They're nothing like the 
Starlink satellites. 

75
00:03:52,840 --> 00:03:55,960
The satellites are individual 
objects, space miles apart, 

76
00:03:56,200 --> 00:03:59,680
moving a high speed to the sky. 
I've seen them many times. 

77
00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:01,320
I know what Starlink satellites 
look like. 

78
00:04:01,320 --> 00:04:04,160
I've also seen UFOs and I've 
seen them up close, so I know 

79
00:04:04,160 --> 00:04:07,240
what they can look like. 
They don't look a thing like 

80
00:04:07,240 --> 00:04:09,840
Starlink satellites. 
Now, there's a picture below 

81
00:04:09,840 --> 00:04:12,440
this and you can see these 
meteorites coming in. 

82
00:04:12,680 --> 00:04:14,240
Looks like four of them living 
this. 

83
00:04:14,360 --> 00:04:16,640
They're red living this blazing 
trail behind them. 

84
00:04:16,720 --> 00:04:19,000
Very beautiful photograph taken 
by pilot. 

85
00:04:19,480 --> 00:04:23,840
And then below them, you see 
this rod just hovering there in 

86
00:04:23,840 --> 00:04:27,040
the sky as these meteorites go 
darting overhead. 

87
00:04:27,040 --> 00:04:31,360
Easy to tell the difference. 
Certainly not a string of 

88
00:04:31,360 --> 00:04:33,200
satellites. 
The string of satellites would 

89
00:04:33,200 --> 00:04:35,160
have been above where you see 
the meteorites at. 

90
00:04:35,480 --> 00:04:37,760
These people apparently think 
these salads are floating around

91
00:04:37,960 --> 00:04:39,560
at the same altitude as 
airplanes. 

92
00:04:39,840 --> 00:04:42,880
It says a stunning photograph 
taken by a FedEx pilot of a 

93
00:04:42,880 --> 00:04:46,560
meteor burning up in the 
atmosphere with a white BLOB 

94
00:04:46,680 --> 00:04:50,120
with a white BLOB below it, 
resembling the objects captured 

95
00:04:50,120 --> 00:04:52,400
by Vernet and the other 
witnesses he gathered. 

96
00:04:52,640 --> 00:04:54,800
Notice the language is becoming 
a little deceptive. 

97
00:04:55,120 --> 00:04:58,480
They call this a white BLOB. 
This is not a white BLOB. 

98
00:04:58,760 --> 00:05:04,360
This is clearly a rod shaped 
UFOI think this article is using

99
00:05:04,360 --> 00:05:08,400
some. 
Really insidious high levels of 

100
00:05:08,400 --> 00:05:11,480
mind control where they're 
putting these little bits of 

101
00:05:11,480 --> 00:05:13,800
doubt in to foreshadow what's 
coming. 

102
00:05:13,800 --> 00:05:17,160
Later in the article, Vernet 
shared videos he collected from 

103
00:05:17,160 --> 00:05:20,720
4 witnesses in Brazil on May 9th
showing similar objects, but 

104
00:05:20,720 --> 00:05:23,880
experts are baffled as to 
whether the objects are indeed 

105
00:05:24,160 --> 00:05:26,600
UFOs or the satellite 
constellation Starling. 

106
00:05:26,840 --> 00:05:33,080
Now see how the author has very 
deceptively set up a, a, a 

107
00:05:33,080 --> 00:05:35,560
fallacy here. 
He's giving you 2 choices. 

108
00:05:35,720 --> 00:05:37,840
Well, they're either UFOs or 
satellites. 

109
00:05:38,320 --> 00:05:41,440
Well, why couldn't you say they 
were flying monkeys? 

110
00:05:42,000 --> 00:05:44,800
Why couldn't you say these 
things were drones? 

111
00:05:45,040 --> 00:05:46,680
I mean, so he's put this out 
there. 

112
00:05:46,680 --> 00:05:49,840
This author has said, well, it's
either UFOs or satellites. 

113
00:05:50,120 --> 00:05:52,600
And then of course he's going to
go on and tell you, well it's 

114
00:05:52,600 --> 00:05:54,320
got to be satellites, doesn't 
it? 

115
00:05:54,640 --> 00:05:58,520
So you're given this false 
dichotomy. 

116
00:05:58,720 --> 00:06:02,400
In other words, you're told 
you've got two choices, but the 

117
00:06:02,400 --> 00:06:05,600
one choice you've given in this 
case is a false choice. 

118
00:06:05,640 --> 00:06:09,520
Instead of this writer just 
being honest and saying, well 

119
00:06:09,520 --> 00:06:12,080
people are taking pictures of 
things and they look like rods. 

120
00:06:12,440 --> 00:06:15,080
Now are they all up to no good 
conspiring to fool us? 

121
00:06:15,080 --> 00:06:16,480
Are they mistaken? 
Who knows? 

122
00:06:16,880 --> 00:06:19,360
But the last thing these things 
look like are string of 

123
00:06:19,360 --> 00:06:22,160
satellites. 
Often a string of satellites 

124
00:06:22,160 --> 00:06:25,320
about as bright as stars moving 
slowly across the sky will be 

125
00:06:25,320 --> 00:06:29,360
mistaken for a true UFO when is 
in fact Starlink, the network of

126
00:06:29,360 --> 00:06:32,560
satellites launched by Elon 
Musk's company SpaceX. 

127
00:06:32,800 --> 00:06:36,280
But usually those lights will 
appear as distant dots in a line

128
00:06:36,520 --> 00:06:39,440
rather than a solid cylinder, 
and will not appear to change 

129
00:06:39,440 --> 00:06:41,560
color. 
Now he has to say this because 

130
00:06:41,560 --> 00:06:44,680
anybody with two brain cells 
together is going to say, well, 

131
00:06:44,680 --> 00:06:47,800
I've looked up at the sky and 
I've seen and I've seen these 

132
00:06:48,680 --> 00:06:50,880
Starling satellites before, and 
they don't look anything like 

133
00:06:50,880 --> 00:06:53,280
this. 
So he goes ahead and he puts 

134
00:06:53,280 --> 00:06:57,280
that definition of what these 
things look like out there for 

135
00:06:57,280 --> 00:06:59,800
us. 
So now he can establish a little

136
00:06:59,800 --> 00:07:05,000
commonality with the reader, 
Chris Spitzer, an expert in UFO 

137
00:07:05,000 --> 00:07:09,320
analysis, told dailymail.com. 
Wait for it that although 

138
00:07:09,320 --> 00:07:13,040
Starling generally appears as a 
trail of distinct dots in the 

139
00:07:13,040 --> 00:07:19,200
sky, once it is fully deployed 
during its ascent it can appear 

140
00:07:19,200 --> 00:07:23,120
as a solid line due to the 
satellites being grouped close 

141
00:07:23,440 --> 00:07:25,680
together. 
Well, that's interesting because

142
00:07:25,680 --> 00:07:28,200
I've never one time ever seen a 
picture of that. 

143
00:07:28,840 --> 00:07:31,840
So once it's fully deployed, 
well, I thought once it was 

144
00:07:31,840 --> 00:07:34,640
fully deployed, they were all 
flying around in outer space. 

145
00:07:35,080 --> 00:07:37,840
But what he's actually trying to
tell you here, and I don't know,

146
00:07:37,840 --> 00:07:43,560
I think maybe some just really 
grumbled, bumbled language, is 

147
00:07:43,560 --> 00:07:47,360
that once the rocket launches 
and when these things first come

148
00:07:47,360 --> 00:07:49,600
out of the rocket, they're all 
kind of together. 

149
00:07:49,600 --> 00:07:52,120
So they might look like a rod. 
Well, they're all kind of 

150
00:07:52,120 --> 00:07:55,360
together moving at 17,500 miles 
an hour plus. 

151
00:07:56,040 --> 00:07:58,920
So I don't think that they're 
all bumbled together for very 

152
00:07:58,920 --> 00:08:00,880
long. 
And I don't think that most 

153
00:08:00,880 --> 00:08:03,800
people are even going to notice 
that and, and have the time to 

154
00:08:03,800 --> 00:08:05,960
say, wow, these things just 
hovered there. 

155
00:08:06,200 --> 00:08:09,800
We're talking about a group of 
satellites moving at thousands 

156
00:08:09,800 --> 00:08:13,600
and thousands of mph in outer 
space that we can happen to see 

157
00:08:13,760 --> 00:08:16,920
compared to an object that's 
hovering overhead, maybe at the 

158
00:08:16,920 --> 00:08:20,120
height of an airplane, somewhere
between 10,000 and 50,000 feet. 

159
00:08:20,520 --> 00:08:24,680
Big, big difference. 
Starling sats may look like all 

160
00:08:24,680 --> 00:08:27,360
objects right after deployment 
when they reach Earth orbit 

161
00:08:27,360 --> 00:08:29,040
because they're stacked 
together, he said. 

162
00:08:29,240 --> 00:08:31,320
They may. 
Well, I would like for Mr. 

163
00:08:31,440 --> 00:08:36,640
Spitzer to provide us with one 
picture of that, one image 

164
00:08:37,039 --> 00:08:38,960
recorded. 
That would be nice, because 

165
00:08:38,960 --> 00:08:44,600
right now all I have is a lot of
gobbledygook and his opinion? 

166
00:08:44,800 --> 00:08:47,840
Spitzer shared a likely example.
Now, here you go. 

167
00:08:48,280 --> 00:08:50,680
More qualitative language. 
OK? 

168
00:08:50,720 --> 00:08:54,240
When we're discovering these 
UFOs, we're trying to use 

169
00:08:54,240 --> 00:08:59,840
quantitative methods, dates, 
times, places, very detailed, 

170
00:08:59,840 --> 00:09:02,640
exact descriptions. 
OK, thinking about things 

171
00:09:02,640 --> 00:09:06,160
logically, using math, 
quantitative. 

172
00:09:06,520 --> 00:09:10,680
But these debunkers always want 
to go to the qualitative oh, 

173
00:09:10,720 --> 00:09:14,680
you're a conspiracy theory? 
Oh, you're crazy. 

174
00:09:14,960 --> 00:09:19,640
And here's some more of this 
qualitative language, He says. 

175
00:09:20,200 --> 00:09:24,680
Spitzer shared a likely example.
Always giving themselves wiggle 

176
00:09:24,680 --> 00:09:28,040
room, never wanting to be 
accountable for the things they 

177
00:09:28,040 --> 00:09:31,640
say. 
Spitzer shared a likely example,

178
00:09:31,720 --> 00:09:35,160
a stunning photograph taken by a
FedEx pilot of a meteor burning 

179
00:09:35,160 --> 00:09:38,680
up in the atmosphere with a 
white BLOB below it, resembling 

180
00:09:38,680 --> 00:09:42,000
the objects captured by Burnett 
and the other witnesses he he 

181
00:09:42,000 --> 00:09:44,120
gathered. 
The white bright nature of the 

182
00:09:44,120 --> 00:09:47,640
objects could be just reflected 
sunlight, Spitzer explained. 

183
00:09:48,280 --> 00:09:52,520
Now this is, to me, it's just, 
maybe it's not a lie because he 

184
00:09:52,520 --> 00:09:54,840
doesn't know that. 
That's patently untrue. 

185
00:09:55,240 --> 00:09:58,400
But if you look at this picture,
you clearly see the meteorites 

186
00:09:58,400 --> 00:10:00,600
coming in, or maybe it was one 
that broke up, whatever. 

187
00:10:00,600 --> 00:10:01,920
But you see these four 
fireballs. 

188
00:10:02,200 --> 00:10:04,160
And below that, what you see is 
not a BLOB. 

189
00:10:04,560 --> 00:10:09,440
What you see clearly is a white 
silvery UFO rod. 

190
00:10:10,000 --> 00:10:13,280
It's a very distinctive shape. 
But the author here once again 

191
00:10:13,560 --> 00:10:17,640
is using this qualitative 
language where he can insert his

192
00:10:17,640 --> 00:10:21,080
opinion and still pretend to be 
telling you the facts, which is 

193
00:10:21,080 --> 00:10:23,280
not. 
And to say this is, oh, well, 

194
00:10:23,280 --> 00:10:25,560
this is reflecting the sunlight.
Well, then why didn't the 

195
00:10:25,560 --> 00:10:29,120
meteorites reflect the sunlight?
Obviously what you have is the 

196
00:10:29,120 --> 00:10:32,440
meteorites coming in a shower. 
And below that, not in outer 

197
00:10:32,440 --> 00:10:36,440
space where the meteorites just 
came from, but below the 

198
00:10:36,440 --> 00:10:40,640
meteorites in an area where the 
planes are flying, you have this

199
00:10:40,960 --> 00:10:45,480
UFO rod photographed by another 
pilot flying at A at a similar 

200
00:10:45,480 --> 00:10:48,400
altitude. 
Starlink satellites also 

201
00:10:48,400 --> 00:10:50,840
generate UFO sightings right 
after they deploy. 

202
00:10:51,040 --> 00:10:54,000
When they reflect sunlight, they
are released in one batch with 

203
00:10:54,000 --> 00:10:56,640
two clamps parallel to each 
other where they are stacked 

204
00:10:56,640 --> 00:10:58,600
together. 
This could explain some recent 

205
00:10:58,600 --> 00:11:01,600
sightings, he said. 
More qualitative language, more 

206
00:11:01,600 --> 00:11:06,200
debunking, more generalization. 
This is not investigation, OK? 

207
00:11:06,680 --> 00:11:08,200
Nothing close to an 
investigation. 

208
00:11:08,200 --> 00:11:10,680
Now they go on and they rattle 
on a little bit about the UFO 

209
00:11:10,680 --> 00:11:17,080
sightings and they rattle on 
about the Starlink launch times.

210
00:11:17,080 --> 00:11:20,040
They say here on May 6th, the 
same day as the Argentina and 

211
00:11:20,040 --> 00:11:23,120
Chile sightings, a Starlink 
satellite was launched from Cape

212
00:11:23,120 --> 00:11:28,120
Canaveral Space Force Station in
Florida at 6:14 PM local time. 

213
00:11:28,280 --> 00:11:30,920
The problem is they're launching
these things so often that you 

214
00:11:30,920 --> 00:11:34,160
could pretty much blame any UFO 
sighting on Starlink. 

215
00:11:34,320 --> 00:11:37,360
OK, you could say, well, 
somebody was driving a car from 

216
00:11:37,440 --> 00:11:40,000
LA to San Diego that day. 
So it must have been them. 

217
00:11:40,200 --> 00:11:44,480
You are, you are creating 
situation where you've set up 

218
00:11:44,480 --> 00:11:49,200
this straw man, this satellite, 
the, the, the Starling 

219
00:11:49,200 --> 00:11:52,000
satellites. 
And so any time a UFO was 

220
00:11:52,000 --> 00:11:55,520
spotted, well, it must have been
Starlight reflecting off, you 

221
00:11:55,520 --> 00:11:57,720
know, it must have been sunlight
reflecting off a satellite. 

222
00:11:57,880 --> 00:11:59,880
It must have been the launch. 
It must have been the rocket 

223
00:11:59,880 --> 00:12:03,280
coming down. 
It's it's now their go to 

224
00:12:03,360 --> 00:12:07,120
debunker used to be swamp gas, 
now it's satellites, he says. 

225
00:12:07,120 --> 00:12:12,520
I am pretty sure startling sets 
also all cap generate UFO 

226
00:12:12,520 --> 00:12:15,760
sightings right after they are 
deployed, when they reflect 

227
00:12:15,760 --> 00:12:19,440
sunlight, blah, blah, blah. 
Yeah, yeah, we this is just the 

228
00:12:19,440 --> 00:12:21,920
same tired excuse. 
I tell you, it really gets old. 

229
00:12:22,200 --> 00:12:26,040
On May 8th at 6:42 PM, another 
launched from John F Kennedy 

230
00:12:26,040 --> 00:12:30,120
Space Center on Merritt Island, 
FL, the same day as the sighting

231
00:12:30,120 --> 00:12:33,640
on the Uruguay border. 
There was no Starlink launch on 

232
00:12:33,640 --> 00:12:37,160
April 29th when Burnett captured
his video, but there was a 

233
00:12:37,160 --> 00:12:41,040
launch from Cape L Canaveral at 
9:50 PM the previous evening. 

234
00:12:41,040 --> 00:12:42,800
So I guess I just hung around 
for a day. 

235
00:12:43,200 --> 00:12:46,880
One video is from my camera at a
hot spot here in Rio, Burnett 

236
00:12:46,880 --> 00:12:49,960
said. 
In May, these big luminous rods 

237
00:12:50,160 --> 00:12:53,200
started to appear in Argentina, 
Uruguay and South of Brazil. 

238
00:12:53,560 --> 00:12:55,720
I have many videos people sent 
me. 

239
00:12:55,720 --> 00:12:59,000
The only explanation for me 
would be Starlink, but no 

240
00:12:59,000 --> 00:13:01,440
satellite train was visible at 
the time of the sighting. 

241
00:13:01,760 --> 00:13:04,600
I wish that someone would tell 
this gentleman that he's not 

242
00:13:04,600 --> 00:13:07,400
obligated to explain these 
things, just report him. 

243
00:13:07,400 --> 00:13:10,240
That's all you have to do. 
Burnett, who works as an 

244
00:13:10,240 --> 00:13:14,280
electronics computer engineer at
Brazilian oil firm Petrobras. 

245
00:13:15,320 --> 00:13:19,320
Petrobras is a prominent UFO 
researcher in Brazil and founder

246
00:13:19,320 --> 00:13:23,000
of the UAP brazil.com. 
So you have some good pictures, 

247
00:13:23,280 --> 00:13:26,320
you have some decent reports 
that actually good reports that 

248
00:13:26,320 --> 00:13:29,120
give you the time, the date to 
place everything that right down

249
00:13:29,120 --> 00:13:32,080
to the geographical coordinates.
And then the rest of the article

250
00:13:32,080 --> 00:13:38,880
just focuses on this absolute 
nonsense with Starling Satellite

251
00:13:39,280 --> 00:13:41,120
and the whole debunking there 
that goes on. 

252
00:13:41,120 --> 00:13:42,960
It's it's, it's, it's outrageous
really. 

253
00:13:43,160 --> 00:13:46,840
But until we start to have more 
of our own stuff published on 

254
00:13:46,840 --> 00:13:49,920
forums, we can access it without
without the debunking. 

255
00:13:49,920 --> 00:13:52,040
This is what we're left with. 
At least we got the pictures out

256
00:13:52,040 --> 00:13:55,400
of this and we got some facts 
about the sightings. 

257
00:13:55,720 --> 00:13:58,840
Now these things have been going
on long before Starlink and I 

258
00:13:58,840 --> 00:14:03,440
want to take a look at this 
article from New Mexico that 

259
00:14:03,440 --> 00:14:05,480
happened back. 
This incident happened back in 

260
00:14:05,480 --> 00:14:09,640
2014. 
Now, continuing with these rods,

261
00:14:10,280 --> 00:14:13,560
this article here is from 
news9.com dated Thursday, 

262
00:14:13,560 --> 00:14:18,600
November 20th, 2014. 
It says News 9 investigates the 

263
00:14:18,600 --> 00:14:21,520
phenomena of rods. 
Cameras capture a variety of 

264
00:14:21,520 --> 00:14:23,960
moments in time, but sometimes 
they capture something else, 

265
00:14:24,160 --> 00:14:28,320
something unexplained. 
One man from New Mexico believes

266
00:14:28,320 --> 00:14:31,840
he's discovered a new life form,
which has spurred a worldwide 

267
00:14:31,840 --> 00:14:33,800
debate. 
So you can see right at the bat 

268
00:14:33,800 --> 00:14:36,920
that they're framing what these 
things are in a much different 

269
00:14:37,440 --> 00:14:40,400
light than the previous article.
Cameras capture a variety of 

270
00:14:40,400 --> 00:14:42,440
moments in time, but sometimes 
they capture something else, 

271
00:14:42,440 --> 00:14:45,640
something unexplained. 
One man from Nick, one man from 

272
00:14:45,640 --> 00:14:48,040
New Mexico believes he 
discovered a new life form, 

273
00:14:48,040 --> 00:14:50,080
which has spurred a worldwide 
debate. 

274
00:14:50,480 --> 00:14:54,120
There is a phenomena that exists
among us, said Joe Escamilla, 

275
00:14:54,120 --> 00:14:57,720
founder and researcher of Rods. 
They're like skyfish. 

276
00:14:57,920 --> 00:15:00,040
They swim through the air like 
fish. 

277
00:15:00,400 --> 00:15:03,320
He first captured a strange 
image on his photographs back in

278
00:15:03,320 --> 00:15:06,200
1994. 
At first I thought they were 

279
00:15:06,200 --> 00:15:08,840
insects, birds, you know, 
floating close to the lens of 

280
00:15:08,840 --> 00:15:14,760
the camera, he said 1994. 
I don't think that Starlink was 

281
00:15:14,760 --> 00:15:17,480
around then. 
However, at such a high shutter 

282
00:15:17,480 --> 00:15:20,240
speed, he says he eliminated the
possibility of it being an 

283
00:15:20,240 --> 00:15:23,880
insect rubber, but something 
else, something mysterious. 

284
00:15:24,120 --> 00:15:26,280
We think it's a living entity of
some kind. 

285
00:15:26,600 --> 00:15:28,520
It does have behavior of being 
alive. 

286
00:15:28,520 --> 00:15:31,200
Set Escamilla. 
They're very evasive. 

287
00:15:31,560 --> 00:15:35,040
They're super fast. 
Escamilla calls this entity 

288
00:15:35,080 --> 00:15:40,280
Arod, measuring one to six feet 
long with a cylinder body and 

289
00:15:40,280 --> 00:15:44,640
multiple sets of wings. 
We don't know what they're doing

290
00:15:44,640 --> 00:15:47,480
here, We don't know how long 
they've been here, he said. 

291
00:15:47,720 --> 00:15:51,320
We have rock carvings that 
appear to show rod on cave 

292
00:15:51,320 --> 00:15:55,840
drawings from 50,000 years ago. 
Skeptics, however, don't buy 

293
00:15:55,840 --> 00:15:58,600
into the rod theory. 
Skeptics like Mark Zimmerman, an

294
00:15:58,600 --> 00:16:01,480
assistant professor of 
photography at the University of

295
00:16:01,760 --> 00:16:05,520
Central Oklahoma, and Edmond. 
I hate to call myself a skeptic,

296
00:16:05,960 --> 00:16:09,480
really, but I'm probably labeled
as that because I just think 

297
00:16:09,800 --> 00:16:12,640
there's some sort of scientific 
answer for things like this, 

298
00:16:12,760 --> 00:16:15,560
said Zimmerman. 
Notice the qualitative language 

299
00:16:15,560 --> 00:16:19,200
he uses. 
Because I just think so. 

300
00:16:19,200 --> 00:16:22,280
He's appealing to authority, and
the authority is himself. 

301
00:16:22,520 --> 00:16:25,160
He doesn't say, well, we've 
measured all this stuff and it 

302
00:16:25,160 --> 00:16:26,680
looks to us like it's this or 
that. 

303
00:16:26,880 --> 00:16:32,040
No, I just think because I've 
got a fancy college degree and 

304
00:16:32,040 --> 00:16:36,000
I'm an assistant professor, I 
think it's interesting and makes

305
00:16:36,000 --> 00:16:39,480
good for and makes for a good 
topic of discussion. 

306
00:16:39,800 --> 00:16:43,640
In fact, he discussed the 
phenomena in class recently 

307
00:16:43,920 --> 00:16:46,760
after one of his students, Eric 
Perry, captured what appears to 

308
00:16:46,760 --> 00:16:49,280
be a rod in a photograph taken 
for a class assignment. 

309
00:16:49,920 --> 00:16:52,840
It was actually somebody in 
class who pointed it out, said 

310
00:16:52,840 --> 00:16:55,720
Perry. 
As part of the assignment, Perry

311
00:16:55,720 --> 00:16:58,880
took the same photograph at a 
cemetery during different times 

312
00:16:58,880 --> 00:17:01,640
of the day and the night 
photograph, a white object 

313
00:17:01,640 --> 00:17:03,760
appeared in the upper 
right-handed corner. 

314
00:17:04,079 --> 00:17:07,280
People in class joked around 
about it like UFOs, but most 

315
00:17:07,280 --> 00:17:11,560
likely it was probably a bug or 
a plane or something. 

316
00:17:11,560 --> 00:17:15,280
He said the fact that it was in 
a cemetery made it a little more

317
00:17:15,280 --> 00:17:18,200
creepy. 
So he set up this scenario for 

318
00:17:18,200 --> 00:17:20,119
you. 
This another one of these false 

319
00:17:20,119 --> 00:17:21,720
dichotomies where you're given a
choice. 

320
00:17:21,920 --> 00:17:24,920
Well, it must have been a bug. 
Based on what? 

321
00:17:25,240 --> 00:17:27,800
Did you set up a controlled 
environment to take a picture in

322
00:17:27,800 --> 00:17:30,120
where you could eliminate bugs? 
That would have been the 

323
00:17:30,120 --> 00:17:33,200
scientific thing to do. 
But these debunkers, it doesn't 

324
00:17:33,200 --> 00:17:35,960
matter if they've got a PhD, 
they don't want to approach this

325
00:17:35,960 --> 00:17:38,440
stuff quantitatively. 
They want to approach it 

326
00:17:38,440 --> 00:17:41,080
qualitatively. 
That way they can be the 

327
00:17:41,080 --> 00:17:43,720
authorities and they can tell 
you what to think. 

328
00:17:44,120 --> 00:17:47,160
Zimmerman agrees. 
The object is more likely not 

329
00:17:47,240 --> 00:17:50,040
out of this world. 
You can capture planes as 

330
00:17:50,160 --> 00:17:53,160
they're going across the sky, 
satellites, things that you 

331
00:17:53,160 --> 00:17:56,000
typically wouldn't see other 
than like a dot. 

332
00:17:56,160 --> 00:17:58,000
Typically when you look up, he 
said. 

333
00:17:58,200 --> 00:18:01,720
Where is with longer shutter. 
When it's open, things will move

334
00:18:01,720 --> 00:18:05,560
and light will reflect off it. 
I don't know, man, but for a 

335
00:18:05,560 --> 00:18:08,640
professor, doesn't seem like 
it's that well constructed of a 

336
00:18:08,640 --> 00:18:11,120
sentence to me. 
Wanting to prove his point, 

337
00:18:11,200 --> 00:18:13,480
Zimmerman shot a series of 
photographs at different 

338
00:18:13,480 --> 00:18:16,760
exposure times around a porch 
light, capturing what appears to

339
00:18:16,760 --> 00:18:20,840
be objects similar to rods but 
actually turned out to be Moss. 

340
00:18:21,120 --> 00:18:24,080
Like other camera experts, 
Zimmerman says cameras are 

341
00:18:24,080 --> 00:18:27,320
capable of producing artifacts. 
Something in the picture that 

342
00:18:27,320 --> 00:18:28,640
wasn't actually there. 
Yeah. 

343
00:18:28,640 --> 00:18:30,320
Especially when you set it up to
do that. 

344
00:18:30,680 --> 00:18:32,840
We're not talking about people 
taking pictures at random 

345
00:18:32,840 --> 00:18:35,200
shutter speeds, talking about 
people just taking a normal 

346
00:18:35,200 --> 00:18:37,080
picture. 1 frame, one frame. 
It's not. 

347
00:18:37,520 --> 00:18:40,680
But once again, the debunkers 
one to debunk. 

348
00:18:41,240 --> 00:18:44,960
Escamillia viewed Perry's 
photography from class and says 

349
00:18:44,960 --> 00:18:48,360
the mysterious and says the 
mysterious object is not a rod, 

350
00:18:48,640 --> 00:18:51,800
but perhaps an airplane. 
However, he says that doesn't 

351
00:18:51,800 --> 00:18:55,000
disprove his rod theory. 
Each object has his own certain 

352
00:18:55,000 --> 00:18:57,320
footprint, a certain pattern of 
flight. 

353
00:18:57,600 --> 00:19:00,120
You can tell what an insect 
looks like, you can tell what a 

354
00:19:00,120 --> 00:19:02,920
bird looks like. 
A dragonfly and a rod is a rod, 

355
00:19:02,920 --> 00:19:05,600
he says. 
Escamilla says rods can be seen 

356
00:19:05,640 --> 00:19:08,680
anywhere, but their hotbeds are 
in Washington, DC, New Orleans, 

357
00:19:08,680 --> 00:19:11,160
Canada, Mexico, Texas, Arizona 
and California. 

358
00:19:11,640 --> 00:19:14,360
He says they have also been 
captured in Scotland, Russia, 

359
00:19:14,360 --> 00:19:16,680
Japan, China, Germany and the 
UK. 

360
00:19:17,120 --> 00:19:20,440
Well, now we know South America.
Escamilla has seen rods and 

361
00:19:20,440 --> 00:19:22,920
photographs and video space and 
even underwater. 

362
00:19:23,240 --> 00:19:26,920
He even spied a rod in a video 
taken from Sky News 9 during 

363
00:19:26,920 --> 00:19:30,840
tornado coverage in 1999. 
Those rods are huge. 

364
00:19:31,160 --> 00:19:34,280
That one white rod that comes 
out of the top of the cloud, 

365
00:19:34,640 --> 00:19:38,000
That cloud front was 10 miles 
away from the helicopter and it 

366
00:19:38,000 --> 00:19:41,200
comes out at 3 frames. 
The thing must have been 100 

367
00:19:41,200 --> 00:19:42,920
feet in length. 
Set Escamilla. 

368
00:19:43,360 --> 00:19:44,560
So what do you believe? 
Do rods? 

369
00:19:44,600 --> 00:19:47,400
Do rods exist among us? 
These strange living creatures 

370
00:19:47,800 --> 00:19:50,520
that appear and disappear in the
blink of an eye, caught at just 

371
00:19:50,520 --> 00:19:52,800
the right moment in time? 
Now they're talking about these 

372
00:19:52,800 --> 00:19:55,200
things moving so fast, but the 
ones in South America, people 

373
00:19:55,200 --> 00:19:57,680
are talking about them actually 
hovering there or moving very 

374
00:19:57,680 --> 00:20:00,600
slowly. 
I think everyone always has some

375
00:20:00,600 --> 00:20:03,800
sort of conspiracy on anything. 
I mean, it could be Bigfoot, 

376
00:20:03,840 --> 00:20:06,880
said Zimmerman. 
The phenomena is real, and for 

377
00:20:06,880 --> 00:20:09,760
those of you who don't believe 
in it, that's your prerogative. 

378
00:20:09,960 --> 00:20:13,520
You can believe what you want or
disbelieve, but the fact is 

379
00:20:13,520 --> 00:20:15,240
these things are here, said 
Escamilla. 

380
00:20:15,520 --> 00:20:18,440
They are doing something here. 
We don't know what they are, but

381
00:20:18,440 --> 00:20:21,200
they're doing it. 
Escamilla says technology has 

382
00:20:21,200 --> 00:20:24,600
improved the documentation of 
rods, where he's now able to 

383
00:20:24,600 --> 00:20:28,160
capture them using infrared 
filters and in high speed 

384
00:20:28,280 --> 00:20:30,440
footage. 
Well, you can see the different 

385
00:20:30,440 --> 00:20:32,280
styles of writing in these two 
articles. 

386
00:20:32,600 --> 00:20:35,520
One, the author spends the 
entire time trying to debunk 

387
00:20:35,720 --> 00:20:38,520
what's been photographed, and 
the second one the author keeps 

388
00:20:38,720 --> 00:20:40,840
from 10 years ago. 
The author keeps an open mind 

389
00:20:41,200 --> 00:20:43,600
and really gives us a delightful
read. 

390
00:20:43,640 --> 00:20:46,960
At any rate, the rods are back 
in South America, and until next

391
00:20:46,960 --> 00:20:49,240
time, this is UFO warning over 
now.