Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode we're talking about some unsolved cattle
mutations from the 1990s. That's correct, unsolved cattle
mutations from the 1990s. This first article we're looking
at concerns Jean Barton. The title says Jean Barton.
A look back at cattle mutilation in the 90s and this is from
redbluffdailynews.com. I'll try to put the links at the
Kofi and the Locals website, and that's a picture here at the top
of the page. It says Jeff Hemfield
photographs victim #1 on papoose meadows.
Laysan at National Forest. It's got a picture of this pork
cow. It's been mutilated there at
this stage of the game. It's quite bloated, but you can
see the classic stripping away the flesh there along the jaws
of the animal, the article says, dated May 16th, 2015 by Red
Bluff Daily News. So this is an older article, you
know, over nine years. It begins by saying someone or
something likes my efforts at gardening.
Back in February I had a gallon pot with a blooming geranium
near the house and when I returned from Texas it was gone.
In March, someone had dug up all my blooming yellow primroses and
put them in a bucket. When I returned in the evening
from the cattle women meeting next morning, the bucket and
flowers were gone. The other day my new roll up of
a 50 foot Costco garden hose and 25 foot soccer hose disappeared.
They had been by the tubs of flowers in the yard.
If it had been mutilated cattle I would have known what was
happening because Bill and I lost 32 head in 10 years
starting in October 1995. We have had dead cattle in
previous years but always assumed the coyotes had been
there before we found the bodies.
My Christmas letter of October 1995.
On 15th Bill and I rode Eagle Lake Shore and found cows near
Gallatin Beach. Drove cows up Papoose Creek and
alongside the outside of Papoose Meadow fence and put them in a
corral. Left horses in corral and made a
trip to Red Bluff with heifers. Morning of 16th we made a round
trip to One O 1 Ranch to get some cows that had come to Dye
Creek Ranch. Arrived at Papoose at 1:30.
Elwyn and Emily were there with a portable loading chute.
Bill helped set up the chute and I took the horses out of the
Meadow to get a drink of water. After being in a dry corral,
there was a dead cow out by the old fence rails directly east of
the corral. She was laying on her right side
and her left ear was cut off. Looked closer and her teeth were
cut off flat with utter but no blood dripping.
Her left cheek was removed and it was a clean jaw bone with no
flesh or blood on bone. The tongue was completely gone.
The rectum and vulva was gone in a large Oval.
She had been dead a couple of days because she was blooded and
flies were buzzing. Now imagine this poor cow that
cut off the teats that you know the the little teats are where
you where the baby sucks the milk out of them on.
You have to think this is a very blood, blood rich environment.
I can't imagine you could cut that part of the anatomy off and
there would not have been profuse bleeding goes on.
It says Bill brought out the pickup and roll and rolled her
over. It was a four year old black and
white cow with number brand 135 Rs.
These cows are expensive. Went to Marina and called
sheriff office, JD Hemfel, the brand inspector and Joyce
Coakley at USFS. So they're running these things
on federal land and of course the cattle had to be branded and
they keep track of all that stuff.
So they're doing the right thing.
They're going through the authorities.
They're reporting this cattle mutilation, you know, trying to
trying to come to some resolution.
What's happened with this thing? Within 1/2 hour Deputy Mike
Schmidt, the deputy at Eagle Lake arrived.
His first words when he saw the cow was the same thing, cut away
the same thing. I wish I could find a fresh one.
Seems that he has seen a couple this spring.
It is common in Big Valley and Ravendale area.
He took some pictures and I took some pictures.
Then he asked if that was the only one we lost.
We said we hadn't looked for more so he left and we settled
the horses and rode, checking the cows over in the tall grass,
a damp ground into the old cross fence and South in the southeast
corner of Papu's we found a Hereford cow, dead, lying on
right side with left ear missing, tongue removed, cut up
upper and lower left lips and the entire utter was missing.
You could see the stomach and no blood.
The rectum and vulva were an Oval.
There were no human footprints in the damp soil, no car tracks
on either side of fence. Bill used his horse and pulled
her over and it was it was 749, an 8 year old cow.
Both cows had calved within the last two or three weeks because
I noted they're bull cows on October 2nd and when we were Rd.
checking cattle, we found their calves with the other cattle
over by the spring. Next morning Bill and I stopped
at Eagle Lake Ranger District and saw the acting chief, Joyce
Randy and told them about the 2 cows.
But no one was interested in seeing it or sending out the
forest investigator. He was out of town.
So that's the first bit of resistance.
They call the local police and the local sheriff sends the
deputy over. He recognizes the MO on this
thing. He can tell, well, I've seen
cows like this before. They've got the same ritualistic
cuts on them and there's no blood.
But when they kick it up the next level and try to speak to
the federal authorities about this, the federal agents,
because these cattle are being run on federal land, they don't
want to hear about it. Nope.
See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil, don't talk about it,
Goes on it says. Decided to do a letter to the
editor because this wasn't rustling for meat.
Every publication except California Cattlemen and
Sacramento Bee published my letter.
It was a it was nationwide and Western Livestock Journal,
Livestock Market Digest, Nevada rancher, and Northern California
newspapers faxed a copy of letter to Billy Ronnie and after
Wally read it, he phoned Bill. Billy sent it to other media and
I was amazed at her results. Mother heard it on KP radio at
7:00 AM on the 18th. Billy did a talk show with Bruce
Session in the afternoon too. Art Bell, Las Vegas late night
talk show host talked about it on an affiliate Koh Reno on
Wednesday night to Thursday morning.
A man in Susanville heard it. I asked.
I had to ask who is Art Bell. We heard the program one early
morning as she drove to the mountains and it's nationwide.
Of course. Art Bell.
We all know Famous Art Bell has been passed away for a few years
now. Coast to Coast program Channel
12 in Chico and Debbie Cobb, assignment director, sent Mike
Donnelly to Papoose to do a story.
Well, Mike did a beautiful job filming the cows in soft focus
with buzzing flies. We saw the 5:30 PM October 19th
1995 news on a six inch screen powered by a generator at Rodney
at Rodney's Clover Valley Summer Place and then it just kind of
ends there abruptly. But I want to get into this next
article about this, this Gene Barton and their experience for
these cattle mutilations. I mean this stuff is just, it's
just unbelievable. Now this next article goes into
this further. And these 1990 cattle
mutilations 199596, they never have been solved.
Now this article here is from I am at tribune.com.
It says aliens ranchers can only speculate on what's happening to
their cattle. And this is by Rocky Barker of
the Post Register. It says July 1st, 1996.
So this would have been written a little bit after I think what
we just went through. Idaho Falls running cattle on
the western range is getting harder every year.
With drought, low prices, wolves, bureaucrats and
environmentalists, it's a wonder ranchers can still make a
living. Then there are the aliens, says
Don't laugh. Rancher Jean Barton isn't
anyway, and that's the guy we just talked about.
Barton, in Red Bluff, CA is one of hundreds of ranchers who have
found their cattle dead and mutilated over the last 25
years. The phenomena is a reoccurring
theme in the New West. That logic hasn't been able to
totally explain. Honestly, I don't think they've
explained it at all. Barton's involvement with the
mutilations began October 16th, 1995 when she and her husband
Bill were checking their sixty head of cattle running on the
Lassest National Forest in Northern California.
I think maybe that they'd actually had meat laid cattle
before that time period. What they found were two dead
cows with their sex organs cored out.
The ears were gone and on one a section of height had been
peeled away exposing the teeth and jaw.
They were so straight and smooth, Bart, instead of the
cuts, there was no blood dripping.
This is something we've asked many times, you know, how can
one of these cows, I think they have like over 10 gallons of
blood in them? How can these things be cut up
this way? Just, I mean literally butchered
and not leave any blood traces around?
It's it's just there's no explanation for it Since both
cows have been in excellent health and had recently calved.
When their veterinarian, Richard Meinert, examined the parrot, he
could find no exact cause of death.
Both had lost significant blood, but there was none around their
carcasses. He concluded the animals may
have been tranquilized and blood leaded after first compromised
by weakness. Now, I don't know if he's
speaking in code here. I mean, who's going to be out
here in the middle of this National Forest tranquilizing
random cows and somehow letting their their blood out without
dropping any of it on the ground?
The Barton case appears to be the classic cattle mutilation.
The evidence does not suggest predators.
So who or what did it? Your guess is as good as William
Barton said. In December, rancher Tim Howard
lost a pregnant Cal to a similar fate 100 miles north in Kalamath
Falls, Oregon. A calf was found mutilated in
Paisley. OR in April.
Barton knows all the stories because she decided to speak
out. She knows some people will think
she's a kook, But the president of the California Cattlemen's
thinks this issue is too important to ignore.
Now this takes me back to that article that she'd written
talking about her, her gardening stuff being taken.
I don't know. It's almost as if maybe this
lady's been targeted somewhat. You know, we hear sometimes when
people speak out about their UFO experiences or these
calibulation or abduction experiences, Sometimes it almost
seems as if they're being targeted on some level where
they're being harassed. You know, personal property
taken, harassing phone calls, stalking, that sort of thing.
It almost seems like she might fall into that category.
Goes on. It says livestock publications
don't tell ranchers this is going on, she said.
Most ranchers who have had it happen to them don't want to
bother with the media. So you have two things working
there. First off, you have the news
media. Even these lifestyle
publications, which I'm sure all own for the most part at least
by big corporations, they're following marching orders.
They're just ignoring this stuff, or they're debunking it
and trying to debunk it. And then on the other hand, you
have the ranchers maybe feel a little squeamish about the whole
thing. They don't want to draw
attention to themselves. I don't know if they feel bad
that they're they might be able to protect their cattle or if
they don't want to deal with the reality of what's happening here
is what. But a lot of it seems like don't
even report this stuff. It says livestock publications
don't tell ranchers this is going on, she said.
Most ranchers who have had it happen to them don't want to
bother with the media. Cattle mutations have been
attributed to everything from satanic cults to the long haired
hippies down the road. The phenomena started getting
attention in the 1970s when a Russian mutilations all over the
West caused law enforcement officials to hold a big conclave
in Saint Anthony. The governor of Colorado issued
a statement decrying the mutilations.
Yeah, a lot of good that did. Since then, another cycle of
reports erupts about every five or six years.
The last one was in eastern Idaho in 1989 and 90, with more
than 30 cases of mutilations reported from Bear Lake to
Rigby. Now remember this article here?
Several years old boat Boise native Linda Moulton Howe has
become somewhat of an expert on the phenomena.
She has been collecting reports on mysterious animal killings
since the 1970s, when she was reported for a Denver television
station. In her book An Alien Harvest,
she says extraterrestrial aliens are responsible and that the
federal government knows it. You know, I would have to really
kind of agree with that, just as on a on a hunch at least, I've
talked to dozen of eyewitnesses who have seen Silver Disk
landing in their fields, she said in a telephone interview
from her home in Jameson and Jameson, Pennsylvania, ranchers
have told her about non human creatures carrying away their
cattle. Most people will find it hard to
believe such stories without the proof that never seems to turn
up. And many cases of mutilation can
be attributed to predators, mostly coyotes, who take a taste
for the software flesh of cattle often missing from the mutilated
stock. Now they've done something here,
which I think is pretty sketchy, and they're just making some
generalizations in many cases. They don't cite any studies,
They don't. They don't give us any specific
facts. They just throw this in there as
if they're the authority figure and we're supposed to believe
them. Many cases can be attributed to
predators. Most like coyotes.
I don't know. I live in, you know a rural
area. People have cows.
I, I I've never heard of of of coyotes ever ever.
Bringing down a full grown cow, I mean maybe a calf remember?
No. I suppose the coyotes get a
little bigger in the West, but throughout most of the country a
coyote maybe weighs 35 pounds, 40 lbs tops they, whereas a wolf
can weigh well the ones that aren't.
The hybrids that were released by the government and normal
wolf would weigh about maybe 140 a £150.
I think some of these big boys that they bred and released up
in Minnesota are up over £200. That's the topic for another
show, but I just just imagine this cowboy's 1000 lbs, so it's
hard to imagine even four or five of these coyotes attacking
1000 LB cow and bringing down. It's just just silliness,
actually. I mean, a coyote is actually a
lot smaller than, say, a Husky or a German Shepherd or
something like that. These these coyotes are going to
predate on the animals that are easiest for them to kill.
They're a lot more likely to eat your cat or your little dog than
they are a cow. And that's just the facts.
Now it goes on here. It says.
In 1975 to 76, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Warden Joe
Curry examined several cattle in Fremont County that were
supposed to have been mutilated. He concluded they were killed by
predators. It doesn't say what predators
this is 75 and 76. I don't think the wolves have
even been reintroduced to a lot of these places.
So what's the magic predator that's doing all this damage?
Quote, I personally didn't see anything that looked like it was
mutilated by a human being, Curie said.
Boy, he's got a point. I don't think it was mutilated
by a human being either. Rigby veterinarian Ferran
Kinghard responded to several reports of mutilated animals in
1990. He came to a similar conclusion.
The ones I saw, there could be a logical explanation, he said.
But I don't want to leave the impression there aren't
relations. I'm sure there have been some.
Now talk about trying to talk in circles and cover your rear end.
That's what I call that right there.
And that leaves the mystery that keeps stories like this alive.
It keeps Jean Barton watching the western skies and telling
anyone who will listen to pay attention.
Well, what keeps people watching?
I would, I would tell this author, this reporter, is that
cattle can't keep showing up mutilated.
They keep showing up with these strange incisions.
Nowhere in this article did the writer, I think fairly or
adequately address the fact that these things have had these
incisions, like having their teeth cut off of their udders,
an area that's blood rich. But yet when you find the cow
who was supposedly, as they imagined, killed right there in
that piece of grass, but they have no explanation why there's
no blood in the ground. Now, if you've ever done any
kind of hunting, if you've ever, you know butchered animals, if
you've ever walked past a butcher shop, you will know that
when animals are dismembered or cut apart, it involves blood.
There's such a thing as blood splatter.
Doesn't matter if it's human or animal.
When you start going to cutting on things like this, there's
going to be blood splatter all over the place.
But you notice they never specifically address that.
Not one time they speak in generalities because they're
using generalities to try to debunk the facts that are right
in front of you. You're looking at a mutilated
cattle that appears to have been ritualistically mutilated.
But more important than that, this animal, which supposedly
was killed right there in its tracks and then had all these
pieces of flesh cut off of it. There's not a single drop of
blood on the ground. And even the experts admit that
with most of these cases, large amounts have been of blood, have
been evacuated from the body of the animal almost like almost
like an embalmer or something. It's crazy.
I mean think about it. This animal's got.
I think I'll have to look it up again.
But I know it's worth over 10 gallons of blood in it.
Say what you would think that just imagine 2/5 gallon buckets
of blood there. Wouldn't you think that one of
those drops would have fell in the ground?
And secondly, if this animal's had say over half or three
quarter of its blood evacuated from its body, then where's that
blood at? It's not on the ground are we do
believe that it just evaporated. And if it did evaporate then
where's the, where's the residue from the evaporated blood?
So this doesn't look like a crime scene.
This looks like an animal has been taken somewhere, a crime
has been committed and then what we have is just the the deposit
of this body laid back down because there's never any any
sign of a struggle, any sign of predators around the around the
critter. I mean, you don't have to be too
smart to watch a Discovery Channel or some nature show and
watch a wolf predation where these wolves just rip these
animals apart. I mean when you look, look at
say an elk scene where elk has been attacked and killed by
wolves, when those wolves are done with that elk, it's a mess.
I mean, you got body parts laying all over the place, you
got blood splattered everywhere. Same thing like in Africa where
these big lions attack somewhat. And it would be no different if
you had say, 100 coyotes attacked one of these 1000 LB
Cows. So what you see consistently
happen in these in these reports is that they never address the
facts with specifics. They address the facts with
generalities. And frequently those
generalities are based on a false premise, like this notion
that packs of coyotes are running around attacking cattle.
Well, I can tell you from living in a a rural environment, I've
never one time heard of a full ground cow being brought down by
coyote. If that were to happen, it would
make the news. Now, I've heard of calves being
predated by by coyote, probably just the sick ones because like
I said, coyote 35 lbs. I mean I think that's that's
I've known guys have haunted these things and they tell me
the biggest one they ever came across is 35 lbs.
Let's just assume the ones out West are twice that size.
They're still not big enough to take down 1000 LB Animal.
And if they did, there would be a struggle.
And if there was a struggle with these things, were biting and
attacking these things, there'd be blood splatter.
We don't have any of that. We have these cattle chlorine
back in the 90s where she's talking about.
They just right up there's the tall grass.
Oh, look over there. There's a cow lying there dead.
No sign of how it happened. Where's the blood?
There is no blood. A crime scene with multiple
lacerations and incisions, but no blood.
Think about it. These are the sorts of things
that never get addressed in these articles.
They've never been addressed by the federal government or even
by the local investigators. Were all told to look the other
way. It's understandable to me why
someone like Linda Moulton Howe would say, wow, there's so much
evidence being ignored here. That there has to be collusion
between the people that are supposed to be investigating
this and the people that are, or the entities that are committing
these crimes. But even a lot of people in the
UFO committee don't like to talk about it, because you have a
large segment of the UFO committee that sees these alien
entities as only one thing, and that's good.
Kind of like Doctor Steven Greer.
All the goodies are alien ET and all the baddies or some
government program. Well, that's a big
generalization that I'm not sure is safe to make right now, but
that's what I like about going back into these old cases.
They've really stood up the test of time.
So here we have calumulations that happened clear back in
October of 1995. Here we are almost 30 years
later, still not solved, but the debunkers are using the same
lines to lie to us, to confuse us and distract us today as they
were 30 years ago. Until next time, this is UFO
Warning. Over and out.