Hello, and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're asking why are they lying about
chemtrails? That's correct.
Why are they lying about chemtrails?
And we've covered the subject to chemtrails on this program
before in the context of could this be some sort of UFO
terraforming of the planet or maybe it's just a population
control? We don't know what, but it's
important because it's another one of these cases where a
certain narrative is being put out there by the lying
mainstream media that completely contradicts what you can see
with your own eyes. I'm old enough to remember
before we had the clouds completely manufactured every
day of the week almost, with these things that many of us
call chemtrails, what some people call persistent
contrails. And back when we had clear
skies, it was much nicer. And so there's been a bit of
controversy about this because RFK Junior has come out talking
about it. There's been some talk about
President Trump's wife, I guess, even addressing the situation.
And, boy, the war dogs in the media have been released.
So I want to compare what the media is saying, which is
verifiably false compared to what's just simple questions
being asked by people who are are thinking that was first
articles coming from cnn.com. I mean you can't get much more
mainline than that says state lawmakers are looking to ban non
existent chemtrails that could have real life side effects
written by Ramyush Maruf and Brandon Miller, CNN
meteorologist. What you can look up and they
actually have a picture of this airplane just pouring the stuff
out the back end. I mean, not like there used to
be, let me tell you, an up substantiated conspiracy theory.
I got to get that out there right out the get go.
That claims that the US government is controlling the
weather or its citizens by spraying dangerous chemtrails
from airplanes has now made its way into several state
legislatures where it could manifest into real life laws.
We can only hope. It's an example of how unproven
and off the wall theories are bubbling into mainstream
discourse under the Trump administration, many of which
sow distressed in the government.
This effort in particular could prevent actual scientists and
engineers from slowly from slowing the breakneck pace of
global warming, which is inflicting a devastating toll
Americans in the form of extreme weather.
Those first two paragraphs are absolutely full of lies.
Of course, if you go back and you look at the actual data, all
the weather fluctuations are well within the norm.
OK, so they created an imaginary problem because this goes back
to the whole thing of a problem reaction solution.
They created an imaginary problem.
That's global warming. Boy, when I was a kid, the whole
world was going to freeze to death.
It was going to turn into this whole polar apocalypse
apocalypse where we we went into this whole permanent winter
situation and we're all going to freeze to death.
Well, that didn't sell. So now they come up with the
we're all going to die from hot weather theory, boy.
And of course, you can see in the first couple paragraphs
here, they have the same nonsense where anybody who
disagrees with them is called a whack, a coup.
The conspiracy theorist, the name calling when you have to
resort to name calling right off the bat, your argument maybe
isn't that strong. Florida's legislature is moving
along a bill says that would ban geoengineering and weather
modification in the state, and an Alabama legislative committee
discussed a similar bill last week.
Last year, Tennessee lawmakers and the release of airborne
chemicals, which critics called nonsense.
Though debunked many times over the years, Chemtrail believers
say the white condensation lines left behind by airplanes in the
sky are filled with toxic chemicals.
But the theory has re manifested itself in resurgence over
controversy around scientists efforts for weather modification
and geoengineering. OK, so they're making the First
off, they're telling you it's not happening, but then they're
telling you, well, the scientists are making some
efforts to modify the weather. Who put them in charge?
Who put the scientist in charge of modifying the weather?
We saw what happened the last time when they tried to modify a
flu virus. Didn't work out so well.
And those who believe in the conspiracy now have a platform
from the head of the US Department of Health and Human
Services. Well, thankfully.
See, this is the thing. The last time we had this big
health epidemic, the scam demic as I call it, we ended up with
anybody who asked questions, asked questions like why is it
OK to deny a child medical services because you claimed
that a 60 year old might need a hospital bed?
Why, for the first time in human history, in at least in modern
civilization, are we discarding the rule of women and children
1st and focusing on old people instead of trying to save the
kids? What?
What happened to our humanity? Oh well, you're a conspiracy
theorist. Question the narrative.
So here we have a second narrative here.
These these, these narratives are all over the place.
They're like weeds in a garden. So people are concerned about
looking up in the sky everyday and seeing these planes fly
over. Sometimes jets fly over and the
trails dissipate quite quickly. Other times, the trails just
hang on there for hours and hours until the entire sky is a
complete nasty Gray mist overhead.
Meanwhile, scientists are telling us, hey, we think that
if we spray certain chemicals in the atmosphere, we can cool the
planet down. Well, how do you know how far
you're going to cool the planet down?
In an X Plus Sunday, Robert F Kennedy Junior claimed that as
states moved to ban geoengineering our climate by
dousing our citizens our waterways and landscapes with
toxins. This is a movement every Maha
needs to support. HSS will do its part.
Maha refers to Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again movement.
Yes, got to love this guy. RFK Junior is not new here
pointing out this conspiracy, but he is the highest level
government official, sadly, who has fallen into this particular
trap, climate economist journo Wagner told CNN.
So I want, I wonder how many of these climate scientists are
making money off of this thing. Elon Musk has been running this
doge operation. Just the very tip of the
iceberg, finding all this money that's being funneled through
these supposed nonprofits where people are getting money,
they're walking in the front door of the government gave
money at the back door, follow the money.
Where did this conspiracy theory come from?
It says the most enticing conspiracy theories often have a
dash of truth in them. And then these idiots, they have
a picture of what is clearly a chemtrail sky.
I mean, this is not what the skies look like in 1970.
OK, I was around. I can tell you the skies did not
look like this. The most enticing conspiracy
theories often have a dash of truth in them, even if that
truth is completely unrelated to the conspiracy being contrived.
That is certainly the case with the chemtrails conspiracy
theory. I have to think these guys are
being paid by somebody each time they add the world word
conspiracy theory into the article because boy, they're
really working on it. Which is based on their premise
that aircraft condensation trails or contrails contain
chemicals for weather modification, controlling
citizens, brains or even biological warfare.
Now, that's not what, that's not the theory of chemtrails.
Chemtrails says, hey, they're doing one or two things.
They're just, they're just spraying the stuff straight out.
Mostly what they're doing, it's coming right out the back of an
airplane and it's got aluminum in it and all kinds of stuff
that they're working this thing like the mob from 7 different
angles. And possibly it's also being put
into the airplane fuel where, you know, you have your normal
kerosene they're burning, but maybe they're throwing something
else in there to add this reflective haze that just hangs
around all day. The contrails, on the other
hand, are essentially clouds created by planes.
They're mostly water vapor and small amounts of other traces of
gas that form in the wakes of high altitude airplanes.
Proporters of the conspiracy theory question the consistent
nature of condensation trails, like why only some planes
produce them or why they always aren't there.
Hey, look, you can go on your flight radar and you can see two
planes going over. I've done this many times.
One will have a persistent contrail, a chemtrail, and the
other one won't. Same altitude, same temperature,
everything. So please explain that to me.
The truth is it takes a specific combination of humidity and
temperature for condensation to form in an aircraft exhaust.
Those conditions are spatially prevalent on clear, cool days
when the sky is off and cloud free.
Yes, and you like I said, you'll see two planes go by, one will
have it, the other doesn't. This is this is just another lie
in this article. Still, weather modification is a
real thing. Cloud seeding.
OK, Now this is what's called they're, they're trying to use
diversion as a form, form a deception.
So we all know about cloud seeding.
We've accepted that as fact because we've been doing it for
years and years. It's a completely different
thing than the chemtrails, which are designed to have a global
effect on the climate, to actually cool the climate down.
And who knows what happens after that goes on down here.
It says how chemtrails went from conspiracy to legislation.
Even before Kennedy's new position, conspiracies about
geoengineering and chemtrails ran rampant online.
A 2017 study by Dustin Tingley and Wagner, the climate
economist, found 60% of geoengineering discourse on
social media over the past decade was conspiratorial.
So the people that are advocating for spraying us in
order to cool the planet, they're the ones that you're
going to ask to look over opinions on this stuff and
decide whether or not it's conspiratorial?
I mean, yeah, nothing like asking the fox to guard the hen
house. But the chemtrail conspiracy
theory was around long before social media, likely originating
in the mid 1990s, possibly earlier.
And when extreme weather happens, discourse on those
conspiracy theories tends to spike, Wagner told Cnni don't
think this has anything at all with extreme weather.
People have been talking about this since probably at least the
1990s. That's when the stuff really
started in earnest. I think now it goes on and gives
you a little bit more garbage here about this.
It's really, it's really awful what they're doing.
I mean, the article goes on. They have a picture of some of
the damage that was done down North Carolina.
Look, you had a war that was released from a dam.
People weren't warned about it. A lot of stuff.
We could talk for hours about how those people were victimized
and how the water flow was actually mismanaged.
So every time they have an opportunity to let water out of
a dam and they can kill a few 1000 people and destroy a few
100,000 acres of property, well, they love it.
They love that because then they can go on TV and say, oh, look
at the extreme weather. Look, we've always had extreme
weather. There's just a lot more
urbanization, a lot more housing, and there's a lot more
of tinkering with the landscape. And so if you have a giant
reservoir like they did in North Carolina, and this thing fills
up with water and maybe you wait a little too long to let go, or
maybe you built houses too close to the river or whatever, and
there's going to be damage. And that's got nothing to do
with the Earth's climate. That's just got to do with lots
of people living close to water and running the risk of that
happening when there is a major weather event.
We have had major weather events since there's been weather.
But that's the first article from CNN that's telling you,
hey, it's all conspiracy theory. Don't believe.
But these people are all wacko. And they're saying that out on
one side of the mouth and then out of the other side of the
mouth, they're saying, boy, it's really getting hot down here.
We need to cool this planet off. We need to charge you for all
your carbon that you use. Yeah, We need more control over
you. Yeah, well, what's actually
going on? Let's take a look at what some
of these private companies are trying to do right now as people
are sleeping. Here's an article from
technologyreview.com. It says a startup says it's
begun releasing particles into the atmosphere in an effort to
tweak the climate. Make Sunsets is already
attempting to earn revenue for geoengineering, a move likely to
provoke widespread criticism. By James Temple Dated December
24th, 20220 Nobody's spraying the clouds, but you have a
private company that's trying to earn revenue.
Who's paying these people and why do they have the right to
spray chemicals in the atmosphere that you and I
breathe? Who put these terrorists in
charge? As far as I'm concerned, these
people are climate terrorists and they should be prosecuted to
the fullest extent of the law. They are no better than a drunk
driver, but they're worse actually because you're doing it
on a global scale. So while CNN is telling you
nothing to see here, move along, you have these scumbags
releasing here, What does it say?
A startup claims it has launched balloons that may have released
reflective sulfur particles in the stratosphere, potentially
crossing a controversial barrier and a field of solar
geoengineering. Who gave them the right?
And please tell me who's tracking these weather balloons
that they have released up into the stratosphere?
What's to prevent one of these things from flying into a
passenger jet? Do you see the total disregard
for safety that the government has for you as a passenger on a
commercial airline or as just somebody on the ground?
He's trying to breathe clean air.
Geoengineering refers to deliberate efforts to manipulate
the climate by reflecting more sunlight back into space,
mimicking a natural process that occurs in the aftermath of large
volcanic eruptions. In theory, spraying sulphur and
similar particles in sufficient quantities could potentially
ease global warming problem reaction solution.
So even when there's not a problem, you have to create a
problem. What happens if the Earth gets
too cold and we can't grow crops, like happened back in the
Middle Ages when we had this extreme volcanic activity?
It's not technically difficult to release such compounds into
the stratosphere, but scientists have mostly, though not
entirely, refrained from carrying out even small scale
outdoor experiments. Well, some of us would disagree
with that. We think it's been going on for
a long time and now they think that they have you acclimated to
it to a point where they can just be in your face about it.
And it's not clear that any have yet injected materials into that
specific layer of the atmosphere in the context of geoengineering
related research. They just told you that they
did. So once again, lying to you,
straight to your face. This is called cognitive
dissonance. That is when they do something,
they do it in front of you, you're able to see it with your
own eyes and they turn to you and lie to you and say that's
not happening. I didn't do that.
They're trying to create a state of confusion in your mind, and
that's in part because it's highly controversial.
Yeah, people don't like to have their atmosphere destroyed.
Little is known about the real world effects of such deliberate
interventions at large scales, but they could have dangerous
side effects. And no kidding, the impacts
could also be worse in some regions than others, which could
provoke geopolitical conflicts. Just think about this.
We have millions and millions of people living on the edge.
They're producing just enough food to survive if you cool the
planet. And their yields on the little
gardens that they make in the backyard are reduced by 10 or
20%. That's starvation for them.
That's 10 or 20% of their family members not making it till next
year. Some researchers who have long
studied the technology are deeply troubled that the company
makes Sunsets appears to have moved forward with launches from
a site in Mexico without any public engagement or scientific
scrutiny. It's already attempting to sell
cooling credits for future balloon fights that could carry
larger payloads. Several researchers MIT
Technology Review spoke with condemned the effort to
commercialize geoengineering at this early stage.
Some potential investors and customers have reviewed the
company's proposals, saying that it's not a serious scientific
scientific effort or a credible business, but more of an
attention grab designed to stir up controversy in the field.
Look, they're threatening to affect the climate.
Luke Eiseman, the Co founder and CEO of Make Sunsets,
acknowledges that the effort is part entrepreneurial and part
provocation and active geoengineering activism.
Luke Eiseman needs to be investigated for ECHO terrorism.
If he's actually doing this, he does not have the right to spray
these harmful chemicals into our upper atmosphere and attempt in
an attempt to cool the planet. That's not OK.
He hopes that by moving ahead in the controversial space, the
startup will drive the public debate and push forward a
scientific field that's faced great difficulty carrying out
small scale field experiments amid criticisms.
We joke slash, not joke that this is partly a company and
partly a cult, he says. Yeah, I would think that it
leans heavily toward the cult thing.
Eisman, previously a director of hardware at Y Combinator.
I believe that's Yeah. Geoengineering, says he expects
to be pilloried by both geoengineering critics and
researchers in the field of taking such a step.
And he recognizes that making me look like the Bond villain is
going to be helpful to certain groups.
You do not have the right to attempt to cool down the entire
globe. This one moron thinks that he
has the right to cool a planet. Over 6 billion people have had
this. This is psychopathic narcissism.
If you can't look at this on the face of it and say this is not a
good situation, why is my government lying to me about
this? Why is CNN lying to me about
this? Why is this narrative of global
warming being pushed on me while private groups are being
encouraged and allowed to spread harmful chemicals into the upper
atmosphere of the earth in an attempt to cool down the entire
planet? This is an act of war on
humanity. If these idiots run around like
there's some kind of climate hero or something, what is going
on with our country? And when someone like RFK Junior
coming along and says, hey, this, this stuff needs to be
stocked or our state legislatures, they're called
conspiracy theorists. They're not conspiracy
theorists. These guys are just simply
investigators. People concerned about the world
that we live in goes on and says, but dedicated experts in
the field think such efforts are wildly premature and could have
the opposite effect from what Eisman expects.
Yeah, no kidding. I tell you.
The situation is serious. And you have to ask yourself why
in the world are they so intent on geoengineering this planet?
Now of course, Yahoo is all over this too.
This is February 12th of this year.
Says others would call it conspiracy theories.
Florida anti chemtrail bill advances.
What it means they can't even get the first word out of their
mouth. Has to be conspiracy theory.
It tells you right there they have a weak argument.
A bill to ban weather modification activities in
Florida passed his first legislative hurdle Tuesday.
The Senate Environmental and Natural Resources Committee
voted six to three along party lines to advance it after
hearing comments from a sponsor and President Donald Trump's
second wife. Now they got to.
They've got to get that thrown in there, don't they?
A bill would ban attempts to cause or disperse rain, snow,
fog or other atmospheric conditions, sometimes called
cloud seeding. OK, now they're lying to you.
They are confusing 2 separate things.
Cloud sittings that's used to turn clouds into rain.
Been around for a very long time and this.
And then there's the chemtrail manufacturing where they spread
these these sulfuric acid and other chemicals at high
altitudes in an attempt to block out the sun and cool the planet.
2 completely different things. Cloud sitting, I don't know,
probably done what about 1020 thousand feet maybe, and the
chemtrails done at a much higher altitude.
Some would call it concerns, others would call it conspiracy
theories, but I thought that perhaps this bill would allow us
to start somewhere where we can start to separate fact from
fiction, she said. According to Florida Politics
and SP56 passes, it would repeal nearly a dozen provisions in
Florida statutes, allow state licensed weather modifications
such as cloud seeding to cause rain, block any future
innovations, and prohibit the injection, release or dispersion
of any substance or apparatus into the atmosphere within
Florida's borders for the expense purpose of affecting the
temperature, the weather, or the intensity of sunlight.
Well, they've got to use the law on the books apparently that
that is there to keep the cloud seeding safe in order to prevent
the chemtrail activity. The bill also adds fines up to
$100,000 for violations and amount dramatically increased
from 10,000 in the original version.
They should also put some prison sentences in there.
Normally second degree misdemeanors such as violation
in the bill would result in a $500 penalty.
Look, you get on the highway as a drunk driver, wreck or no
wreck, and they're going to alter your life when they catch
you. You're going to probably spend
time in jail. You're going to pay a huge fine,
may not be driving for a long time.
Your quality of life is going to go downhill quite a bit, at
least temporarily. But you're allowed to spray
Willy nilly the stuff in the air via these balloons, a high
altitude in an attempt to cool the planet.
And hey, no big deal. And the committee hearing,
Garcia brought up the term that the bill itself carefully avoids
chemtrails. Yet many will complain.
A lot of our constituents have that there's activity going on,
aircrafts flying by, some type of condensation.
You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist, You don't
have to be a nut job to be able to look up in the sky and say,
wow, I wonder why 1520 years ago those jet controls dissipated
and I had nice blue skies. But today I have giant trails of
smoke that completely stretch from one end of the horizon to
the other that never go away, that just meld together and turn
my daily skies into overcast soups of toxic clouds.
What's happening here? I'm not going to believe it.
That's just a normal thing. And then it goes on here says,
but think about what the concerns are.
Health risks, including respiratory issues.
I get a lot of these complaints also allergies, environmental
impact, and it goes on. So what you have here basically
is this person in Florida has gotten enough complaints from
the constituents and must be Marla Maples says Trump's second
wife. Maybe somebody with a little bit
of notoriety comes along and says, look, we have started
asking some questions here. It just takes a critical mass of
people to question the narrative.
This is why I'm constantly harping on this question, the
narrative, because if you think about it, from the time you get
up in the morning until the time you go to bed at night, if you
work night shift, from the time you get up at night until the
time you go to bed in the morning, you are presented with
one narrative after another. And if you begin to pay
attention to it, there's probably 10 or 12 of these
narratives that are used to control our life, to try to
control your mental state, to keep you either in a state of
fear, in a state of thinking that you need something that you
don't actually need, and a state of dependency.
And so when you see a concerted effort by the mainstream media
come out in support of a particular narrative while they
attack anyone who questions it, you should know which side you
should be on. And when you're told that you
can't believe your own lying eyes, that's when you really
want to ask yourself, what is the agenda?
And that's what I'm asking, what is the agenda with these
chemtrails? Are they terraforming the
planet? Why?
Why are they allowing random individuals to affect the globe
that we all live in, the possible food supply of 6
billion people, and risking a catastrophic weather events by
just some random idiot trying to control the weather on this
planet? It's amazing when you really
stop and think about it instead of offering solutions that we
can all agree on. No, we're just going to do what
we want to do, and you're going to do what we tell you to do.
If we tell you to put an injection of an unknown
substance into your body to protect you against a particular
flu virus that you may or may not believe in, you're going to
do it. If we tell you that we're going
to spray chemicals into this planet to cool, to cool off, to
radically change the environment that you live in, you may not
see the sun for days at a time, but we're going to do it.
It's amazing to me how these narratives keep coming up over
and over and over again. At the base of every one of
these narratives is the need to control the population.
And when the population begins to ask questions, the people
that are doing the controlling, first thing they'll do is
they'll put the mainline media on it, just like a bunch of war
dogs to attack anybody who's questioning their narrative.
The second thing they'll do is they'll try to deperson you,
they'll try to divorce you to make sure you can't speak about
this stuff. Why?
Well, because it's about control.
And when we get to the highest level of control, what would
that highest level of control be?
Well, it would either be off planet or interdimensional.
And that's why this stuff is so important to the whole UFO
conversation. Who controls who?
Until next time, this is UFO warning over now.