Hello, and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're talking about, Congress must act.
That's correct. Congress must act.
Now we're talking about this report that Arrow put forward a
few days ago. We all know how awful it was.
Congress had ordered the Defense Department to come up with this
this investigative report talking about UFOs to turn over
all the information they had. And basically it's just going to
be disclosure, disclosure, disclosure.
What we got instead was denial, denial, denial.
And I've talked a little bit on the program about how just awful
the report is, just filled with lies and inaccuracies.
But we have a article here from thehill.com written by Mark von
Rinnemkopf dated 315 2020 3/15/24.
This guy really, I think, did a spectacular job addressing this
just horrible report, this propaganda nonsense that Arrow
has released, which is really nothing more than an insult to
even an average person's intelligence.
You can look at the history of UFOs.
You can look at the personal experience that so many of us
have had. You can look at the way that
people who have reported these things have been de personed,
have been persecuted and attacked.
You know something's there and for the US government to come
along, you know, and say after all these years that there's
never been a legitimate UFO sighting happen, well, that's
just crazy on the face of it. And this author goes into a
little bit about, you know, why Congress needs to act.
I think Congress needs to set up some kind of a truth Commission
where they completely go do an in run around the Department of
Defense and all these intelligence agencies and
connect with us to people, the people hiding the information.
They don't deserve our respect or our trust anymore.
They just need to get those guys out of the equation, send in,
you know, whatever kind of law enforcement you need to to go
pick up these unredacted files and publish them.
Simple as that. It says.
Pentagon's flawed UFO report demands congressional action.
On March 8th, the Department of Defense published the most
significant report on UFOs in at least two generations, A
Congressional mandated historical review of U.S.
government Involvement with Unidentified Anomalous
Phenomena, or UAP. Unfortunately, the report from
the Pentagon's All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office
contains an array of striking omissions and one particularly
egregious misrepresentation. The result is a misleading
report which like so much government UFO related
propaganda over 7 decades, tells your reader to just move on.
Nothing to see here. This is the kind of thing I
would expect out of these guys. If, say, they had a crashed,
recovered UFO or meta material or some sort of ET alien
perhaps, or if they were in communication with these things.
If they had something extraterrestrial or
interdimensional in their position, I would expect them to
hide it from us. That's what I expect out of
these guys. And this is what we're seeing
here. They're trying to hide us, hide
it from us by simply lying, straight faced, gaslighting you,
telling you that nobody has ever seen a UFO.
Move along, Nothing to see here. How ridiculous to start.
It makes no mention of how the US government's official
investigation of UFOs began. In a landmark 1947 memo,
Lieutenant General and future Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff Nathan Twinning stated that UFOs are real and not
visionary or fictitious. He also described their flight
characteristics as including extreme rates of climb,
maneuverability and action, which must be considered evasive
when sighted or contacted by friendly aircraft and radar.
It's 1947. They're seeing these things.
They're talking about them. A lot of these guys are World
War 2 vets. Imagine, imagine being a World
War 2 vet fighter pilot, having gone through all that over
there, you know, in Europe or the Pacific or wherever, seeing
a UFO and then being told by some desk jockey that what you
saw was a figment of your imagination.
Or swamp gas. Yes, How disrespectful.
Nor does Arrow's report mentioned to the earliest
surveillance intelligence assessment of UFOSA, late 1948.
Analysis that found many UFO reports came from observers who,
because of their technical background and experience, do
not appear to be influenced by unfounded sensationalism nor
inclined to report explainable phenomena, is new types of
aerial devices they knew. The people that reporting these
things were were expert witnesses.
Like I said, a lot of them combat pilots, these guys have
been through air combat. Do you think that they're going
to be inclined to make a false UFO report?
Give me a break. Citing reports from trained and
experienced US Weather Bureau personnel from 1947, the
admitted document noted multiple observations of strange metallic
disk with a flat bottom and a Round Top.
Note that these incidents predated by several months the
widely publicized June 1947 incident that catalyzed the
flying saucer era. So it wasn't just the flying
saucer that was spotted out there in Washington.
Now these things were all over the place, and they were seeing
a lot of them in 1947. Like, he says, trained and
experienced US Weather Bureau personnel.
They know the difference between a sun dog and a UFO.
Other instance involved silver discs, or balls and balls of
fire that stocked World War 2 aircraft over Europe and Pacific
theaters. The Associated Press, Reuters,
New York Times, Newsweek, Stars and Stripes have the now defunct
International News service referred contemporaneously to
mysterious silver color spheres and silver balls which float in
the air, although omitted by a ARO.
All of this historical background remains significant
because to this day, images and videos continue to emerge of
objects fitting similar descriptions.
In fact, a AROS ex director openly stated this much during a
May 2023 NASA presentation on UAP that U.S. military personnel
are observing quote, metallic orbs all over the world making
very interesting apparent maneuvers.
Notice how he used the conditional language.
There apparent no Mr. Kilpatrick.
We have video of these things and the movements aren't
apparent. The movements are in fact.
Moreover, Arrow has not provided A plausible explanation for Navy
aviators. More recent accounts, including
one harrowing near collision with spherical objects
exhibiting extraordinary flight characteristics, And you'll
notice that they're not addressing the ones that were
spotted down there at Eglin Air Force Base.
Worst of all, Arrow's review misrepresents the most
exhaustive, comprehensive historical analysis of UFO
incidents conducted on behalf of the Air Force by the Battle
Memorial Institute in the early 1950s.
According to Arrow, the resulting report found that all
cases that had enough data were resolved and explainable.
Of course we know that's just a bald face, A bald face lie.
Anytime. You're using terms like all
never and you got to ask yourself what's going on here.
And in in a typical fashion, the modern day folks at Arrow, they
don't want to give any kind of credence or authority to voices
of the past. It's all about themselves.
It's very sociopathic nature in which they operate, Goes on, it
says. But this is not what Patel's
analysis found at all. An Arrow's misrepresentation of
its conclusion speaks volumes. Well, yeah, they flat out lied
to you. According to the Battelle
analysis, as the quality of UFO reports improved, so too did the
number, with unknown explanations of the UFO cases
considered excellent and with sufficient data to draw a
conclusion, 33% were categorized as having unknown origin.
Last, Arrow states that it found no empirical evidence that the
US government and private companies have been reverse
engineering extraterrestrial technology.
But the report's categorical denials, alongside with recent
commentary from a Arrow's former director, placed the agency in
an awkward position. Christopher Mellon, depending on
former top civilian intelligence officer, recently stated that
key UAP whistleblowers did not trust a arrow and went instead
to Congress or the Inspector General of the intelligence
community. But what happened with these
guys down there in Florida at the Eglin Air Force Base?
Didn't they make it? Didn't they make some kind of
outreach to Matt Gaetz's office? Is now?
Isn't that how you find out about this?
Arrow appears to have conducted a little investigation beyond
supervisual interviews, whereas the Intelligence Community
Inspector General is a law enforcement official with formal
investigative authorities. Well, we've settled along.
The area doesn't appear to be any kind of an investigative
body whatsoever, not as far as I can see.
The result is a remarkable disconnect between a Arrows
report and what members of Congress revealed after the
Inspector General briefed them in January following the
classified briefing of a bipartisan group of 16 members,
five were quoted saying they found UAP whistleblower David
Gresh or his allegations to be credible, legit, or do have
merit. Several members noted that the
briefing gave them insights into specific locations and private
defense contractors, seemingly aligning with Gresha's claims.
So here you have this collusion between government bureaucracies
and these giant state corporations.
Classic deep state. Such reactions, in tandem with
the Inspector General's ongoing 2 year investigation of Gresha's
complaint, seem incongruous with Arrow's conclusion.
Well, we know Arrow's lying to us.
The Inspector General found Gresch's allegation that
information was inappropriately concealed from Congress to be
credible and urgent. Senator Marco Rubio, Republican
Florida Vice Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee,
has since corroborated this finding.
Senator, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Democrat New York,
along with a bipartisan group of five other Senators sponsored
extraordinary legislation largely mirroring Gresch's
shocking allegations. And in extraordinary comments on
the Senate floor, Schumer stated that according to multiple
credible sources, elements of the US government have been
withholding UFO related information from Congress
illegally. So even someone like Schumer
here, he's starting to see, hey man, maybe I'm losing some of my
power, you know, yes, I've got the authority, but do I have the
power? If you have the authority as a
lawmaker, but they've got all the power because they've got
all the guns and they've got weapons that are beyond guns and
they've got means to listen in that make NSA look like child's
play. Maybe these guys are keyed into
some sort of interdimensional grid where they can hear
Everything Everywhere from a God's eye view.
How do we know? Wouldn't that be enough of of an
incentive for these people in the deep state to clued to hold
information about UFOs, aliens and all this from us?
If they give them complete power and domination, they're going to
say, hey, you can have all the authority you want, but you're
not going to be able to enforce your authority.
Because we have all the power and we have all the power
because we're plugged into whatever these extraterrestrial
interdimensional things are. And the last thing in the world
they want to do is share that knowledge with the rest of us.
Even if you include Schumer and Rubio in the US category, that
goes on down here, it says. Despite Arrow's former director
repeatedly characterizing allegations of illicit UFO
retrieval and reverse engineering efforts as baseless,
the principal sponsor of Schumer's UAP Disclosure Act,
Senator Mike Rounds, Republican South Dakota, indicated last
week that the Senate will proceed with the legislation.
In short, there seems to be a classic conflict of interest in
the executive branch investigating itself.
Congress, a Co equal branch of the government does not suffer
from this and so in the wake of arrows flawed report at a
congressional Select Committee like the one requested by
Representative Eric Borlson, Republic of Missouri should step
forward to separate fact from fiction.
Now the refrain to the DoD is part of the executive branch
which means that that we would be under the President of the
United States. Well, how do you have a equal
distribution of power in this branch when you've got people
that been in the Department of Defense for decades and at most
the president can serve for eight years?
You know, we have a lot of people think somehow the
president's going to give us disclosure.
I really don't think so. I had hoped foolishly, I
suppose, when Trump came into office that he might do
something. But I see his recent comments
even about releasing the Kennedy assassination documents where he
said something to the effect of if you knew what I knew, you
wouldn't have released him either.
What a silly thing to say. What a silly, stupid thing to
say. We already know we can't trust
our government. But maybe, maybe maybe he's
right. Maybe for those of us that still
trust the government, for those people that still get angry when
I question the the safety and intelligence of putting
something in your body that comes in a syringe in which the
person that's giving you that injection won't tell you what's
going on inside that vial for at least 75 years, put the secret
sauce in Don't ask questions. Trust your government.
Well, maybe maybe if Trump released those documents showing
who was involved in the Kennedy assassination might rock this
country to its core. Maybe that's what this country
needs is a good rocking. I'm not talking about anything
of violence or anything like that.
I'm talking about the truth. Doesn't a good book say that the
truth will set you free? A lot of people don't want us
free. A lot of people don't want you
to know what's in the secret sauce.
A lot of people don't want you to know who was behind the
murder of a president, a very popular president, by the way.
And those same people, I think, don't want you to know what's
going on with these UFOs and the collusion perhaps that's being
engaged in between our own deep state and possibly what could be
a very evil force that's here to do who knows what.
Until next time, this is UFO Warning.
Over and out.