Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're talking about Pentagon can't stop
drones. That's correct.
Pentagon can't stop drones. I'm going to try to get through
this episode without getting too upset.
But it is very upsetting as a taxpayer to be told that even
though there are hundreds of drone flights happening around
military bases, strategic nuclear power plants and
whatnot, that the Pentagon can't do anything to stop these
drones. Because if they tried to do
anything, it would somehow interfere with communications.
It might put people at risk, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
It sounds like kind of a pretty poor excuse to me.
And we're going to get into it just a little bit.
But before we do, just keep in mind, this is a Pentagon.
This is your Pentagon. The people that cannot account
for $2.3 trillion, $2.3 trillion.
I mean, you know, when you add that up with the 2 trillion that
was lost by the government during the COVID scam demo,
that's 4 trillion. You're getting into real money.
Now the Pentagon, those same people are telling you that even
though we have multiple cases now of UFO drones as they
describe them flying over nuclear power plants, over over
different nuclear missile bases, over military bases, that
there's nothing they can do about it.
If you'll accept that answer, I guess you'll accept about
anything. And this is the Pentagon.
Don't forget the same department that all of these whistleblowers
are coming from. The next time you have a
whistleblower come forward that says I'm former intelligence and
I have all this UFO information that I, I would like to tell you
about, but I can't. But I'll tell you about this
much by my book. Just keep in mind, same people
that lost $2 trillion, same people that have refused to give
us any kind of disclosure about UFOs, those same people are now
telling you you're just going to have to put up with the drones
in your backyard if you live near a military base.
Now, this article from New York post.com says UFO drones are
surveilling America's most sensitive military sites and the
Pentagon says it can't stop them.
Wow. Written by Ronnie Rees.
The date on this is August 13th, 2024.
Fleets of dozens of mysterious UFO drones are surveilling
America's most sensitive military sites, and the Pentagon
admits it can't do much to stop the aerial intruders, according
to a new report. Drones of unknown origin have
been spotted flying over military bases in Virginia and
Nevada over the past year, including the secret base for
the Navy's elite SEAL Team 6 commando unit and Naval Station
Norfolk, the world's largest naval port, the Wall Street
Journal reports. Federal laws, however, prohibit
the military from shooting down the drones over the potential
risk to troops and civilians. Is it really over risk to troops
and civilians? Is that really what they're
worried about? Or is this something they put in
there to, to, to to benefit the people they serve?
One or two options, probably either the Chinese or some kind
of off planet entity that wants to view this stuff.
And This is why I talk about the deep state.
People in our own government that we elect to protect us are
instead tying the hands of the military.
Jamming their signals was also ruled out in high level White
House meetings, according to the Journal, over concerns that it
could interfere with 911 systems, Wi-Fi network and
commercial airliners. Why did they shoot down the
three UFOs over Yukon, Alaska and Lake Huron last year?
Then? You know, if the White House
wanted to, they could declare a state of emergency in that area
and take these things out immediately, Congress be damned.
They they could do their job, but they're not.
Why aren't they? The result is that the Pentagon
has little recourse to halt the potential surveillance from
foreign adversaries. So the people that are telling
you that they know all that needs to be known about UFOs,
but you can't have the information, those people are
unable to protect you from a Chinese drone over a nuclear
missile site. How pathetic is that?
It's time that we stop glorifying these guys all the
time and hold them accountable. Former US Air Force General Mark
Kelly was first made aware of the drone sightings in December
2023, where officials at the Langley Air Force Base along the
Virginia coast reported seeing dozens of drones flying over the
base at night, according to Wall Street Journal.
That should tell you something. He's a general.
And he only becomes aware of this stuff like 10 months ago.
It's been in the paper for years.
So you have a general who's either completely clueless or
complicit with the people that are doing this.
I hate to say I'm going to hope he's I'm, I'm hoping he's
clueless. But could he be that clueless?
I mean, could he have his head so far removed from reality that
he didn't even know that these things were an issue until
December of last year? Go back and look about how long
I've been doing podcasts on this stuff.
This stuff's been going on for years.
The base is home to the F22 Raptor fighter jets, one of the
American military's most advanced stealth warplanes.
The drones continue to appear over the course of 17 days, with
officials suspecting that they might have been deployed by
Russian or Chinese agents to spy on American military assets.
Well, if they were Russian, they probably had to buy them from
the Chinese because snooping does not constitute an imminent
threat. The military is prohibited by
law from shooting down the drones.
Now they've got shoot to kill orders on some of these bases
I'm sure, but you can fly a drone over it no worry.
Snooping does not constitute an imminent threat.
Well what's the difference between snooping and spying?
And if that was you or I flying a drone over this place taking
pictures, how would we be treated?
This should tell you that your government is bought and paid
for by either the communist Chinese or some strange off
world or interdimensional entity because nobody in their right
mind puts all their stuff out there like that for people to
see this. This goes beyond plausible deny
deniability. OK.
It says a directed jamming attack also had the potential to
interfere. Interfere with commercial
aircraft near the peak of the holiday travel season. 1 FA
official warn. Well you got to get the FAA on
this because we know how vigilant they are to protect the
skies. Analog tactics were also
unsuccessful as local police aiding in the investigation
would lose sight of the drones during the midnight chases, the
Journal reports. The drone sightings ended on
December 23rd with officials still unsure as to where they
came from and who was operating them.
Oh, yeah, these things can fly right over your house, man, 30
feet off the ground. And by gosh, if you shoot one,
if old farmer Jed goes out there with his shotgun and takes one
down, well, he's looking at, at at being charged with a federal
crime, a felony, a felony now for shooting down a Chinese spy
drone. Think about this. 50 years ago,
the guy would have been a hero for shooting down a spy drone
put there by a foreign country. But today they're threatening to
put him in prison. Put him in prison.
These are the same idiots that you're trusting disclosure with
people who refuse to protect our military assets.
Refuse to. They are complicit.
Obviously, given the complexity of the operation and number of
drones flying and coordination, authorities had ruled out the
possibility that amateur drone pilots wore behind the
sightings. Well boy, when they first came
out, this could have been a couple of rednecks out there and
their pickup trucks doing all this stuff, letting off hundreds
of drones. Really, how hard would it be for
them to take one of their real time satellite images?
They seem to have no problem doing it with you or I.
If these things are being controlled by somebody on the
ground nearby, and if they're drones, they must be right then.
Circle their perimeter, find them.
Maybe these things are off world.
Either way, that looks to me like our own government is is in
collusion with the people doing the snooping.
A clue, however, arrived the following month when a Chinese
student studying at the University of Minnesota was
caught flying a drone near the Langley base in January 6th.
The student, Feng Yang Shi, 26, had gotten his drone stuck in a
tree, which he appeared to abandon when he flew to
California the following day. Yeah, yeah.
Just go ahead, bring in Chinese Communist by the 10s of
thousands. Release some all over your
country to look at whatever they want to follow the money on this
stuff please. The drone fell from the tree the
same day, finding his way to the FBI, who found the drone had
photographed Navy ships docked at the base.
She was arrested a week later as he was about to board a one way
flight trip to China, with prosecutors charging him with
unlawfully taking photos of classified naval installations,
the first such case involving a drone, according to the Wall
Street Journal. Magistrate Judge Lawrence
Leonard dismissed she's claim that he was just a student on
vacation flying a drone for fun, with she pleading guilty to the
espionage charge October 2nd. He's just a simple unfrozen
caveman. He didn't know what he was
doing. If he was a foreign agent, he
would be the worst spy ever known, she's attorney Sham Jung
Jing told the Wall Street Journal.
And with the incidents in Virginia, officials have
confirmed that similar swarms of drones had been recently spotted
near the Edwards Air Force Base in Nevada.
The Defense Department has yet to publicly state who is behind
these apparent surveillance drones.
I would almost think this Chinese student is probably more
likely to be innocent than guilty, because if he was
guilty, that would lead me to believe that the FBI would have
ignored the case long enough for him to get back to his Chinese
masters. Could very well be just a low IQ
individual taking pictures of what he thought were cool boats
and the dock. Way to go.
Keeping that SD card in your drone.
By the way, Mr. XI, let's take a look at a couple of these things
and see just how they're trying to #1 blur the line between UFOs
and drones. This is a narrative that the US
government likes to keep out there.
It makes everybody who sees sees a drone look or sees a UFO.
Well then all the deep bunkers can come along and say, well,
that must have been a drone. And even if it was a Chinese spy
drone, hey, no big deal. Better a Chinese spy drone than
a UFO. But it shows also, I think being
it's beyond incompetence, it has to be the complicity and the
collusion amongst actors in our own government with these
foreign powers to allow this spying to happen.
Let's take a look at a couple more of these cases and just see
where this stuff leads us to. So here's another article on
these drones buzzing U.S. military bases.
Like I said, I take a couple things from these articles.
Number one, our military's inaction and the laws written by
Congress go beyond incompetence. This has to be a collusion and
conspiracy between actors of these departments in the, you
know, in legislative bodies with a foreign power or a foreign
entity to hamstring these guys and to handcuff them and to keep
them from taking common sense action of knocking these threats
out. We spent $100 million on a
fighter plane, but we're not allowed to shoot down a $2000
drone. It doesn't make any sense.
It doesn't make sense to the point where you have to start to
ask yourself, is there treason within our own government?
Do we have treasonous parties within our own government
selling us out, making us vulnerable to, if not the
Chinese, possibly some off world interdimensional threat?
That's what that's the first thing I see here.
The second thing I see is the DoD doing a mix and Max with the
narrative very slowly bringing this idea of drones into the
verbiage so that they can begin to just smear every UFO sighting
as a drone sighting. OK.
That's also I think important to them is to shape and control
this narrative. This article is from
telegraph.co.uk. Pentagon puzzle by mystery
drones swarming military base officials at Langley Air Force
Base unsure whether parade of unnamed vehicles were foreign
powers snooping or the work of hobbyists.
How pathetic is that? It's absolutely pathetic.
I'm going to repeat, it is absolutely pathetic and
unacceptable that our military echelon, the very top, cannot
determine whether or not this is Joe Redneck flying his drone too
close to an air base or this is some kind of an organized spy
operation. Either way, the drone shouldn't
be there but any excuse they can use not to investigate.
Whose side are they on anyway? It's just articles by David
Millwood, it says. Dated October 13th, 2024,
unidentified drones spotted flying over Langley Air Force
Base in Virginia have baffled U.S. military officials who are
not sure whether it is the work of hostile powers or hobbyists.
See, that's not even the question.
The question is why are you letting these things even be
there? Airspace over Langley is
restricted and their breach in December 1st, reported by the
Warzone website, which was reported to President Joe Biden,
has triggered alarm among military experts.
Oh yeah, we can see how alarmed they are.
They're doing nothing. The flights lasted 17 days, with
the drones flying over the base about an hour after sunset.
In a statement, the US Air Force confirmed their breaches but
played down the potential threat.
Nothing like your own people to play down the threat and leave
you open to attack another Pearl Harbor just on its way, it
seems. The number of UAS.
Oh, we got a new name, folks. Uncrewed aerial systems
fluctuated and they ranged in size and configuration.
None of the incursions appeared to exhibit hostile intent, but
anything flying in our restricted airspace can pose a
threat to flight safety. The FAA was made aware of the
UAS incursions. Are you idiots?
No. Hostile intent.
Well, they're spying on you. They'll keep the hostile intent
for later. How about that?
And then the FAA? Come on, man.
You have a man in a jet, jet pack flying up on the runway,
and they they can't do anything about it.
Airplane pilots calling into the FAA.
Hey, we've got a man in a jet pack flying here and the on the
approach at LAX. What?
What should we do? Well, fly around him, I guess.
The parade of drones was witnessed by General Mark Kelly
from the US Air Force, The Wall Street Journal reported they
were flying at around 100 mile per hour at 3000 to 4000 feet,
with the witness saying they sounded like a parade of of lawn
mowers. Yeah.
So what did the general do? Well, nothing.
Come on over. Yes.
Are you the CCP? Yes.
Go ahead. Come on.
Bring your bring your drones
over right here. No problem.
Yeah, so a freaking general sets her and watch watches as a swarm
of drones flies over a military base.
Does that sound OK to you? Not to me.
The incursion triggered 2 weeks of meetings at the White House
involving officials from the Pentagon, including staff from
its UFO office and the FBI. Could you imagine if Pearl
Harbor happened today? They'd have to have meetings for
two weeks. Under federal law, the military
is only allowed to shoot down drones over a military base if
they pose a direct threat. I don't know.
They're over a military base. They've got no right to be
there. To me, that's a direct threat.
Why wait and find out if they are suspected of snooping?
Although it is illegal, it does not mean they can be brought
down. And members of Congress have
called for powers to be strengthened.
Well, who do you think the scumbags were that made that a
law? What?
What other reason would they have to do that unless they were
in bed with the Chinese and they wanted to leave the target wide
open for them to bring their spy drones in?
Or some other entity that they haven't told us about?
Yes. In February last year, China
triggered a security alert after a suspected surveillance balloon
was shot down by the US Air Force.
It makes me think that what was shot down, the one balloon maybe
could have been one of ours, But the three that were shot down
there in Canada, Alaska and Yukon, I don't believe for a
second that those things were drones or spy balloons because
we just let those have their way.
Yeah, they've those guys have already been given the
clearance. Somebody's already got money in
their bank account to let that happen, is what I think.
Experts at the time believed the balloon, which flew over a major
US missile silo, was a show of force rather than a serious
attempt to gather information. Yeah, somebody just wanted to
start a war. They didn't care about getting
any information. The latest reports are not the
first time the alarm has been raised in the West by the use of
drones. Two years ago, Norway sent
warships and fighter jets to patrol offshore oil platforms
after drones believed to be from Russia.
We're seeing buzzing overhead. Last month, Lloyd Austin, the US
secretary, Defense Secretary, announced an expansion of its
replicator program which has been developing attack drones to
be used against China. Well, they got to make sure they
give China time to get the blueprints before they can bring
them out to market. The drones will also be used to
defend US bases at home in a rod to fight off attacks by
explosive laden drones from Iran linked groups which have been
responsible for the deaths of several American soldiers in the
Middle East. Yeah, but meanwhile, just fly
all of these things over our military bases as much as you
want. I tell you, the way this thing
is being handled is sickening. Take a look at one more article
here and see if we can expose this a little bit further.
Now getting back to this drone threat, we can go clear back
here to September 8th, 2020 talking about these drone
incursions over US nuclear power plants.
That's why it's madding to me to see this, to see that this
general is unaware that this was even going on until 2023.
Just the kind of people we need protecting us.
This is from forbes.com. Dozens more mystery drone
incursions over US nuclear power plants revealed written by David
Hambling. It says like I said, September
7th, 2020. Nikolani says I recently
described how a swarm of drones flew in a restricted area at
Palo Verde nuclear power plant on two successive nights last
September. A new cache of documents
obtained under the Freedom of Information Act reveals how 24
nuclear sites suffered at least 57 drone incursions from 2015 to
2019. And Palo Verde itself was
overflowing again in December, despite new security measures.
Yeah, obviously didn't work. The documents were obtained from
the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission by Douglas D Johnson
on behalf of the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies.
The SCU's main interest is this anonymous aerospace phenomena,
more commonly known as UFOs. But Johnson uncovered a series
of incidents involving something less exotic but potentially more
threatening commercial drones. Now they're assuming that
they're commercial drones. In the September incidents, a
swarm of five or six large drones flew over the Unit 3
nuclear reactor at Palo Verde in Arizona for about 80 minutes, a
length of time which suggests they were carrying out a
thorough survey of the site. The documents released at the
time referred to a similar incident at Limerick Nuclear
Generating Station in Pennsylvania and going to cover
all the bases. Johnson set a follow up request
to get more details. The response was a terse list of
57 security incidents involving drones running from December of
2014 to October of 2019. This provides little more than
the date and location, with no details of the number or type of
drones involved. We do not know how many involved
multiple simultaneous drone flyovers.
At the time the list was generated, 3 of the incidents
were listed as open and five closed resolved, but the
overwhelming majority, fourty nine of them were closed
unresolved. This indicates that for 85% of
the cases, the NRC has no idea who the perpetrators are or what
they intended and has given up on fighting them.
Such hard workers. Well if 85% are unresolved then
how do we even know that they're drones?
There were seven drone incidents in 2017, rising to 21 in 2018,
the last full year for which numbers were given.
This is 2020. So 2 years later still can't
help you. 12 of the sites had only reported a single incident,
but others had seen several. Limerick had five drone
sightings. Perry Nuclear Plant in
Cleveland, OH had 6IN Diablo Canyon near San Luis Obispo in
California had no less than 7 separate incidents from December
2015 to September 2018, all of them unresolved.
The scale and number of intrusions indicate that this is
not a local issue and raise the possibility that drone
overflights could be carried out by a large, coordinated
organization. Oh, you don't think?
While most of the sites were nuclear reactors, there were
also three drone incursions over spent nuclear fuel storage
sites, including Trojan and Origin and Rancho Seco in
California. While radioactive waste is
stored, is still steel canisters inside giant concrete casks.
The new release also indicates that a third incident occurred
at Palo Verde in December of 2019, this time apparently with
only two drones described as industrial sized craft 3 feet
across, similar to those previously seen.
As with the two previous incidents, they were exploring
the Unit 3 reactor area following the September drone
incident. Palo Verde was supposed to be
protected by drone detection technology provided by Area
armor, likely a typo for aerial armor to pinpoint the drone
operator within a 13 mile radius.
The idea was that anyone flying a drone could be rapidly
apprehended by the site security personnel.
This does not appear to have worked.
And again, the incident was closed as unresolved.
So where is the operator at? If the operator has to be within
a 13 mile radius, where are they at?
Are these things even drones? Are these things some sort of
off world or interdimensional entity?
Why are they worried about the the storage for the the nuclear
waste? That's what I don't get.
The big question is how much of A danger such drone overfights
pose. And there has been some lively
online discussion on this point. Well, it's not just the flights,
it's the information that they're gathering from the
flights. They're in restricted airspace,
while reactors themselves are protected by thick concrete
domes able to withstand the impact of a crashing airliner.
Unless it's the one that hit, like on 9/11, the above ground
pools in which spent nuclear fuel is stored may be far more
vulnerable. A 2011 report by the Institute
of Policy Studies noted that over 40,000 tons of highly
radioactive waste is stored in pools, many above ground, some
of the largest concentrations of radioactive material on the
planet. These pools are not heavily
protected, but are in light structures similar to big box
cars and car dealerships. I mean, what could go wrong?
A 2003 report noted how vulnerable such pools were to
terrorist action simply by making a hole in the pool to
drain out the cooling water and causing the stool stored fuel to
overheat. You might want to put that into
a training manual, share it with the FBI, and then they can find
some terrorists for you to carry that out.
We warned that U.S. Open spent fuel pools were
vulnerable to acts of terror. The drainage of a pool might
cause a catastrophic radiation fire, which could render an area
uninhabable much greater than that created by by the Chernobyl
accident. Robert Alvarez, author of the
2003 and and 201 reports, reiterated the danger from
terrorist attacks on fuel pools in 2017.
Greenpeace sought to highlight how easy it would be to hit such
a target by crashing a drone into a French nuclear plant in
2018. How effective small drones would
be is open to question. Certainly, small drones can be
highly destructive against vulnerable targets, showing in
incidents where they blew up ammunition dumps and destroyed
thousands of tons of ammunitions in Ukraine.
The 2 LB warhead fired by the shoulder launched M72 rocket
launcher can make a dime sized hole through 2 feet of
reinforced concrete. The drones seen at Palo Verde
could carry something significantly larger.
Drones might also locate, identify, distract, or even
target security personnel as part of a larger terrorist
threat. If terrorist action.
If drone flyovers became routine, security may cease to
consider they are a danger until it's too late.
Well, it seems like they're acting that way already.
The documents indicate that even within the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, the evaluation of threats, vulnerabilities,
consequences of drone herbalize is still ongoing.
And one meeting on security. Staff pointed out that no
flyovers have yet exhibited a threat to nuclear plant.
Yeah, that's, and look how well the dummies wrote the sentence.
Staff pointed out this is quotes by them.
Staffs pointed out that no flyovers have yet exhibited a
threat to nuclear power plant. I think they mean threat to a
nuclear power plant. That may sound reassuring, but
as long as swarms of mystery drones are able to fly over
nuclear facilities with impunity, there must surely be
cause for concern. There is cause for concern, like
I said, cause for concern that we haven't been sold down the
river by these people. So there's no, no reassurance
here to me whatsoever about what's going on.
I tell you. We'll finish up with this last
little short article here. Just to give you some
reassurance on this. This is from
armscontrolassociation.org. the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
announced on October 30th, that's I suppose must be last
year. I'm not seeing a year for this
that it would not require nuclear power plant operators to
defend against drone attacks. The NCR sets protection
requirements for nuclear power plants and has been studying the
threat posed by drones for the past two years.
And an unclassified summary published in October.
Not even competent enough to give you the year.
The Commission concluded that nuclear power plants do not have
any risk significant vulnerabilities that could be
exploited by drone attacks that result in radiological sabotage
or theft of spatial nuclear material.
The NRC said it would continue evaluating the impact of drone
technologies. Now that's about the most
idiotic thing I've read all day. There's there's no
vulnerabilities. They just told you that if they
put a leak in one of those pools, what that could do?
It caused a fire, a radiological fire.
But we live in a society that wants to keep their head in the
sand. Oh, they want to get really
scared about things like made-up respiratory viruses.
They want to take your rights away.
They want to make you wear a mask that has holes in it.
There are 10 microns across when the virus, if there is one, is 1
Micron across. But when an actual problem comes
along, like a foreign entity or possibly even some kind of off
world interdimensional entity is flying craft over our nuclear
power plants, over our nuclear weapon plants over a military
bases. No worries and don't you dare
try to stop them until next time.
This is UFO warning over and out.