Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode we're asking who is Hal Puthoff?
That's correct. Who is Hal Puthoff?
Now, you may have heard of him lately in some of the news about
Louis Elizondo and testing Metamaterial.
Hal Puthoff seems to me to be a very smart guy and a very old
guy. Born in 1936.
At June we're told how put off is an American electrical
engineer and parapsychologist. His interests have included
Scientology, remote viewing, telekinesis, 0 point energy, and
UFOs. It's funny that he is considered
a parapsychologist. I can't forget my old college
professor telling us any time you see the word para in front
of something just think fake. He had a very low opinion of
parapsychologists, but this is interesting.
Putoff was born in Chicago, IL. He received ABA and an MSC in
Electrical Engineering from University of Florida.
In 1967, Putoff earned a PhD in Electrical Engineering from
Stanford University with the thesis The Stimulated Ramen
Effect and its Application as a Tunable Laser.
Put off then worked on tunable lasers and electron beam devices
and co-authored with R Pantel fundamentals of quantum
electronics widely 1969 put off was also put off also published
papers on polarized vacuum and stochastic electrodynamics.
We've disguised some pretty high level stuff put off took an
interest in the Church of Scientology.
Now this doesn't make any sense to me and I don't mean to be
offensive to anybody that that's involved in this, but to have
you know, so much background in science and Church of
Scientology being started by L Ron Hubbard, a fiction writer.
It's strange to me. Put it took an interest in the
Church of Scientology in the late 1960s and reached what was
then the top OTVI think it's the OT 7 level.
By 1971, Put Off wrote up his wins for a Scientology
publication claiming to have claiming to have achieved remote
viewing abilities called Extraization and Scientology.
In 1974, Put Off also wrote a piece for Scientology Celebrity
Magazine stating that Scientology had given him a
feeling of absolute fearlessness, quote UN quote.
Put Off severed all connection with Scientology in the late
1970s. In the 1970s and 80s, Put Off
directed a program at Stanford Research Institute to
investigate paranormal abilities, collaborating with
Russell Targ in a study of the purported psychic abilities of
Yuri Geller, Ingo Swamp, Pat Price, Joseph Monneagle and
others as part of what they call the Stargate Project.
Both Geller and Swann convinced Put Off and Targ that they
possessed psyche powers, though Geller employed a sleight of
hand tricks. Yeah, I was watching somebody on
YouTube and they were talking about watching 1 of Geller's
demonstrations and they were not impressed at all.
Put Off and Targ studied Yuri Geller at Sri, declaring that
Geller had psyche powers, though there were flaws with the
controls in the experiment, and Geller used a sleight of hand on
many occasions, according to Terrence Heinz.
I've heard that from others, Geller turned out to be nothing
more than a magician, using sleight of hand and considerable
personal term to fool his admirers.
The test that Sri turned out to have been run under conditions
that can best be described as chaotic.
Few limits were placed on Geller's behavior and he was
more or less in control of the procedures used to test him.
Further, the results of the tests were incorrectly reported
in Targ and Put Off's Nature paper.
This is from Wikipedia. Psychologist David Marks and
Richard Cameron attempted to replicate Putt, Off and Targ's
remote viewing experiments in a series of 35 studies.
They could not replicate the results.
While investigating the procedure of the original
experiments, Marks and Kamen discovered that the notes given
to the judges and put off in targeted experiments contain
clues as to which order they were carried out.
Examples included referring to yesterday's 2 targets or the
inclusion of the date of the session written on the top of
the page. They concluded that these clues
were the reason for the experiment's high hit rates.
Terrence Heinz has written examination of the few actual
transcripts published by Target and Put Off show that just such
clues were present. To find out if the unpublished
transcript contained cues, Marks in Common wrote to Target and
put Off questioning requesting copies.
It is almost unheard of for a scientist to refuse to provide
his data for independent examination when asked, unless
it involves a particular jab, I suppose, but Targ and Put Off
consistently refused to allow Marks and Common to see copies
of the transcripts. Marks and Common were, however,
able to obtain copies of the transcripts from the judges who
use them. The transcripts were found to
contain a wealth of cues. Marx noted that when the queues
were eliminated, the results fell to chance level.
James Randi noted that controlled tests by several
other researchers, eliminating several sources of queuing and
extraneous evidence present in their original tests, produced
negative results. Students also saw Put Off and
Targets locations from the clues that had inadvertently been
included in the transcripts, Marks and Kami concluded.
Until remote viewing can be confirmed in conditions which
prevent sensory cuing, the conclusions of Tang and Put Off
remain an unsubstantiated hypothesis.
According to Martin Gardner, Put Off and Target imagined they
could do research in parapsychology, but instead
dealt with psychics who were more clever than they were.
Yeah. And the problem here is a lot of
this remote viewing stuff is coming up with Louis.
And he kind of gets into this, you know, virtuous or maybe
unvirtuous circle where he's citing people like put off and
and their parapsychology research.
But we're finding here that it's been deemed not to have worked.
But yet Louis goes Elizondo goes on multiple interviews and says
Oh yeah, remote viewing works for sure.
In 1985, Putoff founded the Institute for Advanced Studies
at Austin IASA. That must have been where Luya
was taking the supposed UFO meta material the other day he was
talking about and said he was chased by green worms.
Later incorporated under Earth Tech International in 1991,
which pursues General, which pursues energy generation and
propulsion research. Put off and Earth Tech were
granted AUS patent in 1998 with claims that information could be
transmitted through a distance using a modulated potential with
no electric or magnetic field components.
While the invention. While the invention does not
appear to rest on solid, albeit somewhat obscure, physics
principles, the case is used for educational purposes in patent
law where the examiner failed to make a prime aphasia case for
inoperability or lack of enablement, according to the
Wisconsin Law school case study. The lesson of the put off
patent, even a competent examiner may fail to distinguish
innovation from pseudoscience. Or maybe we need to have more
competent examiners, examiners in the in the Patent Office.
And then it goes on. It says in the late 1980s and
90s Put Off co-authored papers using the model of stochastic
electrodynamics that leads to a model of inertia as the
electromagnetic drag force on accelerating particles operating
by interaction with zero point field.
This concept built on Andre Sakharov's proposal in 1968 that
the gravitational constant was a consequence of 0 point
fluctuations in the vacuum. Steve Carlip disputed 1 of put
offs night put offs 1989 papers for containing a serious
computational error which makes the effect negligible.
Put Off responded that a different perimeter value in the
model would restore its usefulness.
The 1994 paper was the subject of a news article in Science.
Subsequent Analysis by FMS Levin raising numerous questions
concerning the mathematical correctness of the formula and
the use of non relativistic treatments of magnetic magnetic
effects, concluding that the model does not show inertia as a
result of 0 point field effects. The cosmological implications of
a different 1989 paper by Puthof on the original electromagnetic
0 point energy was examined by Paul S Wesson.
Among numerous difficulties, general relativity requires that
such energy not gravitate, so it cannot be similar to
electromagnetic radiation. Building on earlier theoretical
work by Robert L Forward leveraging the Casmir Force to
extend electrical energy, Daniel Cole and Put OFF analyzed the
thermodynamics of a simple hypothetical Casmir Force
device. The hypothetical device
discussed in these articles are capacitors, multiple layers of
charged conductors sufficiently close for the first range Casmir
Force to compress the structure. This works against the mutual
repulsion of the conductor's electromagnetic energy stores.
External electricity would be needed to recharge the device.
Other authors have studied mechanical and thermal devices
based on Casmir forces, while Mazmir Pigilucci, called PUTAS,
hopes to extract 0 point energy as running contrary to the laws
of physics, a propulsion that violates basic principles of
thermodynamics and is considered pseudoscience by credential by
credentialed physicists. Well, we go back to the old zero
point energy thing again. All these guys promising it, but
not a lot going on. And then it says UFOs and Uaps.
According to the Louis Elizondo book, imminent put off served as
chief scientist on AAWSAP and AA tip to closely related UFO
research programs. In the 2000 and 10s he cofounded
the UFO dedicated company to the Stars with Tom Delong.
Well, there you go. So Puthoff was the chief
scientist for a AWSAP and ATIP and then he Co founded the
company to the Stars with Tom Delong.
Can you see the connections here?
Wow, how did those how did those tic tac video get from the DoD
to Tom Delong? Hmm.
It makes you wonder, doesn't it? I've always been under the
impression that Christopher Mellon passed those off to Louis
Elizondo in a parking lot at the Pentagon.
I could be wrong. Just that's what I've, you know,
picked up through public domain, the public domain stuff.
If I'm wrong, please tell me. And that somehow those that
video ended up in the hands of the New York Times and then from
the New York Times inexplicably ended up exclusively in the
hands of Tom Delong, where he published the video on YouTube
with his watermarks splattered all over it.
And now we find here that Puthoff was the chief scientist
at AWSAP and AAT IP. So I wonder if he had a role in
that. I'm just curious.
I don't know. I bet it just seemed weird.
Doesn't it doesn't seem strange to you how these same names keep
popping up over and over and over again?
So now we've got Bob Bigelow, who convinced Harry Reid to
spend what, $20 million on a tip, I guess?
Or was it a, a WSAPI guess? They keep changing the names on
these things so they stay ahead of any kind of congressional
investigation maybe, I don't know.
So you got Bob Bigelow. He's like he's like what, 80 now
or something? 83 we got how put off born in
1936. So he's like 868080, what, 8586
years old. And then we got Louis Elizondo.
So these guys are all just running in packs.
I think it's important to keep in mind that these guys have
have had decades of history together.
So when you hear Louis Elizondo tell you about what a great guy
Hal Putoff is or what what fantastic work that Bob Bigelow
has sponsored, keep in mind these guys, some of these guys
have known each other for decades, decades.
Now. I want to take a look at a
couple articles here just showing you how this all ties
together. It's just madding.
OK, so just to give you a little bit of an idea of how long how
put off has been in the system, this article is from New
dualism.org. The title says CIA initiated
remote viewing at Stanford Research Institute.
Now think about that. The Central Intelligence Agency,
the same spy agency that owns the company, What's that called?
Q Intel. We talked about it here a few
weeks ago, whether you go around buying up the latest emerging
technology to keep it off the shelf from you and I and
monopolize it for the intelligence agencies.
Does that seem like a good way to spend your tax dollars?
I guess it's too bad the one around in the 1910s or whatever.
So they could they could have taken automobiles off the shelf
and that that would have been a great thing for national
security. It's madding.
Anyway, this article is written by HE put off that's how put off
PhD institute for advanced studies at Austin.
And I believe that wasn't that what we just said was this
little thing down there. 4030 breaker lane W #300 Austin, TX
Yeah. We'll have to take a look at
that. I'll see if I can post a link to
the map or something for you over at Kofi.
As always, thanks to the people that go ahead and help the
program out over there. It really helps.
OK, it says. Abstract In July 1995, the CIA
declassified and approved for release documents revealing its
sponsorship of the 19 in the 1970s of a program of a program
at Stanford Research Institute in Menlo Park, CA to determine
whether such phenomena as remote viewing might have any utility
for intelligence collection. Thus began disclosure of the to
the public of A2 decade plus involvement of the intelligence
community in the investigation of so-called parapsychological,
parapsychological or PSI phenomena.
I cannot read the word para without thinking of my old doc
telling us always remember para means fake.
Presented here by the program's founder and 1st Director from
1972 to 1985 is the early history of the program,
including discussion of some of the first, now declassified
results that drove early interest.
Now think about it. The guy's got a job for 13
years, man. Staring at goats.
All right, I mean, this is your tax dollars at work.
I'm sorry, I don't go for all this remote viewing stuff.
They're, they're not able to replicate it.
Steven Greenstreet just had a challenge on his Twitter post
the other day. No, nobody guessed it right.
But this is our tax dollars at work.
They could be doing useful things like releasing UFO
reports that have been recorded 60-70 years ago that they won't
tell us about. So anyway, he goes on and has
this quite long introduction and then he says in early 1972 put
off I was involved in laser research at Stanford Research
Institute, same place Gary Nolan's at, the guy that blocked
me in Menlo Park, CA at I believe right Stanford.
At that time I was also circulating a proposal to obtain
a small grant for one research at a quantum biology.
They just live off government grants.
Honestly, would these guys be able to do anything if the
government wasn't handing out money to them hand over fist?
Like Elizondo? You got a job making, what,
$150,000 a year plus benefits and you want to complain about
it? You sit around and talk about
UFOs all day. I mean, really, I'm just done
with it. And that proposal.
I had raised the issue whether physical theory as we know it
was capable of describing life processes and had suggested some
measurements involving plants and lower organisms.
This proposal was widely circulated and a copy was sent
to Cleve Baxter in New York City, who was involved in
measuring the electrical activity of plants with standard
polygraph equipment. New York artist Ingo Swann
chanced to see my proposal during a visit to Baxter's lab
and wrote me suggesting that if I was interested in
investigating the boundary between the physics of the
animate and inanimate, I should consider experiments of the
parapsychological type. Swann then went on to describe
some apparently successful experiments and psychokinesis in
which he had participated at Professor Gertrude Smidler's
laboratory at the City College of New York.
As a result of this correspondence, I invited him to
visit Sri for a week in June 1972 to demonstrate such
effects. Frankly, as much out of a
personal scientific curiosity as anything else.
Well, isn't it nice that your tax dollars are being used to
satisfy output US personal scientific curiosity?
Really. Prior to Swan's visit, I
arranged for access to a well shielded magnometer used in a
cork detection experiment in the Physics department at Stanford
University. During our visit to this
laboratory, sprung as a surprise to Swarm, he appeared to perturb
the operation of the magnometer, located in a vault below the
floor of the building and shielded by MU metal shielding,
an aluminum container, copper shielding, and a superconducting
shield. If, to add insult to injury, he
then went on to remote view the interior of the apparatus
rendering by drawing a reasonable facsimile of its
rather complex and heretofore unpublished construction.
It was this latter feat that impressed me, perhaps even more
than the former, as it eventually did representatives
of the Intelligence community. I wrote up these observations
and circulated circulated among my scientific colleagues and
draft form of what was eventually published as part of
a conference proceeding. In a few short weeks, a pair of
visitors showed up at Sri with the above report in hand.
Their credentials showed them to be from the CIA.
They knew of my previous background as a Naval
Intelligence officer. There you go, and then civilian
employee at the National Security Agency.
NSA several years later and felt they could discuss their
concerns with me openly. So here you have just this
revolving door from the Navy intelligence to the NSA to
Stanford. Now on to the UFO Mafia history
channel. A clear progression.
There was, they told me, increasing concern in the
intelligence community about the level of effort in Soviet
parapsychology being funded by the Soviet security services.
By Western scientific standards, the field was considered
nonsense by most working scientists.
As a result, they had been on the lookout for a research
laboratory outside of academia that could handle a quiet, low
profile classified investigation, and Sri appeared
to fit the bill. They asked if I could arrange an
opportunity for them to carry out some simple experiments with
SWAN and if the test proves satisfactory, would I consider a
pilot program along these lines? I agreed to consider this and
arrange for the requested test. Isn't that nice?
From the Navy to the NSA to Stanford back to the CIA, it
never ends. This is your tax dollars at
work. Just piles and piles and piles
of money being wasted. The tests were simple, the
visitors simply hiding objects in a box and asking Swan to
attempt to describe the contents.
The results generated in these experiments are perhaps captured
most eloquently by the following example and one test, Swan said.
I see something small, brown and irregular, sort of like a leaf
or something that resembles it, except that it seems very much
alive, like it's moving. The target chosen by one of the
visitors turned out to be a small live moth, which indeed
did look like a leaf, although not all responses were quite so
precise. Nonetheless, the integrated
results were sufficiently impressive that in short order,
an 8 month $49,909 biofueled measurement program was
negotiated as a pilot study. A Laser colleague, Russell Tagg,
who had a long time interest in involvement in parapsychology,
joined the program and the experimental effort was begun in
earnest. Yes, follow the money.
I mean, they've got all they do, all this remote viewing, but
nobody was able to stop 9/11. Amazingly enough, during the 8
month pilot study at Remote Viewing, the effort gradually
evolved from the remote viewing of symbols and objects and
envelopes and boxes to the remote viewing of local target
sites in San Francisco Bay Area, demarked by outbound
experimenters sent to the site under strict protocols devised
to prevent artifactual results. Later, judging of the results
was similarly handled by double-blind protocols designed
to foil artifactual matching. Since these results have been
presented in detail elsewhere, both in the scientific
literature and the popular book format, I directed the
interested reader to see those sources.
To summarize, over the years, the back and forth criticism of
protocols, refinement and methods and successful
replication of this type of remote viewing and independent
laboratories has yielded considerably scientific evidence
for the reality of the phenomena.
And then it goes on from there. Well, you heard what they said
in Wikipedia. They said that the cues, there
were so many cues in the paper that there was, there's no way
you could, you could show this stuff was, was actually
accurate. And the the paper goes on quite
a long ways, actually. It has a lot of interesting
stuff in it, but it shows me how putoff's been around for a long,
long time. It is from this revolving door,
like I said, going from Navy intelligence into what, the NSA,
then to Stanford, then back to the CIA.
And he's 80, what, 80, born in 1936.
So he's like, what, 86 years old or something?
And he's still all over the place.
Still all over the place. Let's take a look at one last
article here of some of the stuff he's been saying recently.
So you kind of get an idea of what's going on now before we
finish up with this last article, I did repost an
interview with Hal put off over on the Twitter account at UFO
Warning. And you you can take a look at
their. Yeah, he's into some pretty deep
stuff, man. I got to tell you how much of it
I believe, I don't know, but interesting character and he's
an important character because he's been around for so long.
And I think it's important that we, when we hear these guys talk
about different experiences or they're doing this or they're
doing that, keep in mind the connections.
Now this year, articles from irishtar.com, not one of my
favorite sources, but it's all right, I guess.
It says hairy aliens used mind control to scare off officials
from UFO Christ site. Ex CIA scientist claims a group
of small, Gray and hairy aliens appeared on earth and controlled
the minds of covert American officials to stop them from
recovering a UFO crash site, according to classified
documents. There's articles by Adam
Callier, says Reddit lead John O'Sullivan audience and editor
Adam Callier dated June 19th, 2024.
Just a couple months ago, sterling allegations have
surfaced that diminutive hairy Gray aliens once visited Earth
and used mind control on undercover U.S. officials to
prevent the recovery of a UFO crash site.
These astonishing revelations emerge from recently disclosed
emails between former CIA scientist Hal Puthoff and ex CIA
Life Science Division analyst Kit Green.
Their exchanges were revealed in a 1999 issue of a UFO magazine
pinned under the false name Greg Halifax.
Here, the narrative of an individual known as Sej Masters
was detailed who was part of a squad tasked with securing a
downed UFO. UAP such alleges that his
operation continues the blackest of American covert operations
roping in various intelligence community members, all
thoroughly screened for psychological soundness, reports
the Daily Star. Locations involved in these
incidents, named after Zodiac constellations and ranging from
New Mexico to Denmark to the Midwest of the US, sparked great
intrigue. However, the most mysterious 1
dubbed Zodiac entered the Nordic territories.
A fresh analysis of the emails and accounts suggest that
extraterrestrial beings were present, described as small,
Gray and hairy. Recorded recovery sites include
spots in New Mexico, the Danish coastline and the Midwest.
In the account an anonymous Colonel recounts to a
psychologist out during one crash retrieval, a massive UAP
craft materialized overhead the crash location telepathically
instructing the recovery crew against salvaging the downloaded
vessel. The team then experienced 90
minutes of missing time and were not able to share that
information with staff at WPAFB CIA until they were
telepathically released and able to do so, the psychologist
states. The little Gray bachelors have
thought control and empathy projection.
Although no further details of the encounter were made public,
a document shared on Reddit this week alleges that WPAFBCIA holds
over 2 million accounts of UAP UFO sightings by military
personnel and US civilians, which were never investigated.
Well, didn't, didn't Sean Kirkpatrick tell us that they
had investigated every single encounter?
Seems like he did. Seems like he did.
But here you go. We're being told that there was
this text message back and forth between put off another guy
talking about this UFO crash. You have this fellow who's what,
8788 years old, born in 1936. At what point does he say, I'm
at the end of my life here? Why don't I just go ahead and
share some of these secrets that I know?
At what point does he decide that the possibility of him
spending the last couple years of his life in prison is
outweighed by the liberation that this disclosure would
provide? How, how long do these guys have
to carry these carry these secrets?
I mean, it's one thing if it's if it's national security, but
if they know that we actually have this core group of deep
state operators that have all this information, all this
knowledge, and they're holding on to it.
Not because they're trying to protect us from the Soviets to
the Chinese, but they're simply holding on to it so that they
can develop this parallel society where they rule over us.
And this might be the last opportunity for us to regain
control through disclosure. This this could be this could be
the very lifeblood of our Democratic Republic on the line.
And you have to ask yourself at one point, is it more ethical
for these guys, this 8687 year old guy to carry these secrets
to his grave? Or should he come out and just
tell us the truth? Look, it's not the columns elite
that you need to worry about. It's this group of people that
are above them actually that have all this knowledge, all
this information and they are on the verge of creating a parallel
society where they will rule you as if you were ants.
So I have AI have a lot of questions.
If they're simply holding it information secret because of
national security, well, that is one thing.
But if they're holding all this information and people like Hal
Puthoff and Louis Elizondo and all the rest of them, even Bob
Bigelow, are Privy to this information, and they know that
we have this parallel deep state society emerging among us and
that their intent is to rule over us.
They're not keeping it secret because they're worried about
us, our safety. They're keeping it secret
because they're keeping it to themselves.
If that's the case, then I have to keep asking myself, why do
you keep telling me that disclosure is five years down
the road? Why do you keep telling me
there's so many things that you can't talk about?
I'm not interested in the things that you can't talk about.
I'm interested in you saving our country.
Until next time. This is UFO warning over and
out.