Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're talking about Trump versus the
Smithsonian. That's correct, Trump versus the
Smithsonian. Now, I'm going to get into some
of the specifics on the Smithsonian museum here.
For a long time, a lot of people think that the Smithsonian has
been hiding history in the United States, everything from
giants to possibly some type of Egyptian hieroglyphs or the
Grand Canyon to what maybe happened on the moon to UFOs.
Maybe some of Trump's reasons for confronting these guys is a
little different than what we think of in the UFO community or
maybe some of us who suspect conspiracies happening.
But I think it's good to get some light shined on these
people. They've been using a lot of
taxpayer money for a long time. Doing as a darn well, please.
This first article comes to us from New York post.com.
It says good for Trump for looking to make the Smithsonian
grade again. Written by LA Bufkin, published
August 22nd, 2025. Now I have to tell you, I had to
look a while to find an article that was anything close to
unbiased on this. It says growing up in the DC
suburbs in the 90s, my family often hit the museums of the
Smithsonian Institution. I got to know their exhibits as
if they were part of my own neighborhood.
Cheerfully bouncing from wing to wing, knowing exactly where the
coolest stuff was. I distinctly remember being
proud of all the things America had done, briefly identifying
artifacts and displays that correlated with what I was
running in school. These museums were temples of
American greatness. They told a story of discovery,
ingenuity, beauty, and grit. But today, a visit to the
Smithsonian will give you the distinct impression that the
United States is less of a land of innovation and courage than a
hellscape of oppression and crimes against humanity.
For the past few decades, The leaders of these museums have
been busily rewriting exhibits to dwell on America's sins while
muffling her greatest triumphs. President Donald Trump is
absolutely right to call this out.
His new push to examine the museum and peel back the layers
of anti American sediment that have seeped into their publicly
funded exhibits is long overdue. Take the National Museum of
American History. Once a place to marvel at
Franklin's Kite or the Sharp Spangled Banner, it now greets
visitors with pride flags and panels about systematic
repression. Ben Franklin's scientific genius
is framed not as a marvel of Americans intellect, but as
tainted because he owns slaves. The Entertainment Nation
Exhibits paints Mickey Mouse as a legacy of blackface and The
Lone Ranger as the metaphor for US imperialism.
Then there's the National Museum of Natural History.
I remember it as a celebration of American scientists who
mapped the cosmos and conquered disease.
Now it is impossible to miss the overture of climate crisis
panic. The guilt trip of man made
climate change is found repeatedly given today's kids a
sense of culpability and worried to take home along with their
pricey gift shop swag. Yeah, no doubt all made in
China. Seeing the founding documents at
the National Archives has always been one of my greatest joys.
Today, it feels a bit like going through the TSA line at the
airport, complete with security guards yelling to keep it
moving. On a visit with friends of this
year, the staff members in the Rotunda repeatedly shouted that
you didn't need to bother seeing everything.
In the room. Outside the Rotunda, you'll see
repeated themes of American sins in the aftermath of the
founding, including women and minorities being denied the
right to vote. Wow.
Yeah. Comparison to the TSA is
probably pretty close. This is a problem with our
entire government system areas. These people, they don't want to
recognize that they're employees.
They think that they are masters of us.
And this goes through everything that you see in in Washington,
all these departments, right down to disclosure, which we
never seem to get anything of. And it goes on and says, true,
these are important moments in history.
We can learn much from them. What's missing, however, is a
triumph of Americans who fought for those rights and warned
them. The problem isn't limited to the
history of museums. The Smithsonian American Art
Museum now features an exhibit declaring that sculpture has
been a powerful tool in promoting scientific racism.
Another, The Shape of Power, instructs visitors that race is
just a social construct used to establish systems of power and
privilege. How is that a celebration of
American art? It's grievance politics dressed
up in marble. That is not scholarship.
It is indoctrination. It suggests America is uniquely
racist and violent, as if no other nation ever had slavery or
inequality. It frames every achievement
through the lens of oppression. Every innovation is tainted and
every success with an asterisk. Of course, every part of
American history should be taught and displayed, warts and
all. But these museums aren't
highlighting growth, they are pushing our historical black
marks as a primary message. Children and tourists should
leave the museum with an understanding of how far we've
come and how America truly stands out.
Is is the freest and most progressive nation in the world,
one that prides itself on equal opportunity, fairness and the
rule of law? Instead, they've browbeateness
about America's ugliness, greed and shameful legacy, themes that
appeal to the lead. How can we celebrate the
progress and achievement of so many outstanding and selfless
American men and women of all races through the past 250 years
if our main message is that the United States is beyond repair?
Trump is not suggesting censorship or twisting
historical facts that are difficult to cope with.
He merely wants a review to point out what loyal visitors
like me already know. The institutions have been
systematically making our darkest moments in history the
only ones that matter. The next generation should get
to know the real American through the Smithsonian's
impressive collections. Let's square them from the
politics now. I think it's a pretty good,
pretty succinct argument of what's going on here.
I want to get into this a little bit further with this, with this
Smithsonian and how people think that they're actually hiding
stuff. So I went over to ChatGPT to
check on just how the Smithsonian Institution got
started. It tells us James Smithson, who
lived from 1765 to 1829, was an English scientist who left his
entire estate to the United States in his will with the
stipulation that it be used to create an institution for the
increase in diffusion of knowledge.
Smithson had no heirs, and when he died in 1829, his estate was
eventually passed to the US government after the death of
his nephew in 1835. In 1838, the bequest amounted to
over $500,000 in gold. Now, just imagine that gold back
then was about 20 bucks an ounce.
So it's about 150 times that today.
So what are you talking? I don't know, maybe $75 million
or something, A huge sum at the time, which Congress accepted
After a decade of debate on how best to on how best to use the
funds. President James K Polk signed
the law in 1846, establishing the Smithsonian Institution in
Washington, DC. The first building, known as the
Smithsonian Castle, was completed in 1855 and became the
headquarters for the growing institution.
Just imagine $75 million. It went a lot further back then
than it would today, that's for sure.
And it says the mission comes directly from the from Smith's
will for the increase and diffusion of knowledge among
men. Now that's knowledge that's not
propaganda. Today, this mission has evolved
but remains true to Smith's intent.
The Smithsonian conducts scientific research, preserves
and displays art, culture and history, operates museums,
libraries, archives and research centers, provides public
education through exhibits, Is often called the nation's attic
because it holds over 155,000,000 artifacts and
specimens, including the Wright brothers Plains, the Hope
Diamond and moon rocks. Yeah, 155,000,000.
So basically they're just put in charge of all these artifacts
and they decide what we get to see and what we don't see.
So I went ahead and asked, how much money did they receive from
the federal government last year?
Well, it says the most recently available finalized data shows
that for the fiscal year 2024, that's October 1st, 2023 to
September 2024, the Smithsonian received one point O $9 billion
in federal funding from congressional appropriations and
related federal accounts. And Oh my, that's a 4.7%
decrease. Look, $1.09 billion, that's last
year. The year before that it was
1.144 billion. And they don't want to be
accountable to the president or any representative of the
government. Your tax dollars being
misappropriated from you, spent by these huge self governing
departments, administrations, whatever.
This is the apparatus of the deep state right here.
This is what the deep state does.
They take money from you by force in the form of taxes, and
then they claim that they're above the law and can't be ruled
even by the representatives that we elect, like him or Haiti.
Trump is the president and he has the right to oversee this
stuff as commander in chief, but that's not how the deep state
sees it. And it doesn't matter if it's a
Smithsonian or if it's some sort of made-up organization claiming
to investigate UFOs. Now, before we move on here, I
just want to, I want to explain how big this is the Smithsonian
Institute is. I mean, it's a collection of
buildings. All right?
If we go to ChatGPT, we find out that the Smithsonian manages
approximately 25,000 789 acres of federal lands and waters as a
fiscal year 2020. Three 25,000 acres.
I mean, it's just almost unimaginable.
I I mean think about this 25,789 acres that's 40 square miles, 40
square. Just think 40 miles one way, 40
miles the other way. That is a ton of land that's
that's bigger than the the most decent sized cities.
This is unbelievable. They have building space owner
lease 14.8 million square feet. That's 13 million that they
actually own and then another 1.84 million that they lease 14
point million square feet. Now if you think about like a
big Walmart or a big Amazon warehouse, most of those
buildings are going to run around 1,000,000 to 1,000,000
1/2 square feet. They're they're enormous.
That would be 10 of those. It's it's this, this is
gigantic. This is pretty much like all
the, all of the major warehouses for like a like a Walmart.
That's, that's the, that's the total square people.
We're talking about exhibition or storage space.
Well, nicely, I put this together.
Exhibition or storage space, 11,000,000 square feet.
Well, what's the other 3.8 million square feet being used
for? I don't know.
Offices, It's crazy. They've got, they've got centers
just just all over the place. Now we've said it's widely
reported that they have 155,000,000 different items,
155,000,000. So how many of these are on
display where people can see them?
Oh, they estimate about 1%. That's according to ChatGPT.
Nobody really knows. So I have 155,000,000, yeah,
maybe 1,000,000, 1/2 or so. So what's where's all the rest
of the stuff at if we can't even get to it?
If 99% of the stuff that the Smithsonian has is off limits,
it's not even on display. So what's going on with this
stuff? We have the right to know.
And This is why, even though Trump was only coming out
basically and saying, hey, you've got to stop all this DEI
stuff. You need to quit making all this
liberal political statements. The real problem is, is that
they have some of the coolest stuff in America and 99% of it
is hidden away from the public. Meanwhile, they're collecting
well over a billion dollars a year and tax revenue from us,
the people that they mistreat and talk down to and look down
on. This is this is not even
acceptable. But like I said, classic,
classic deep state. Now, there has been talk for a
long time about the Smithsonian covering up all different kinds
of artifacts. Obviously they're hiding a lot
of stuff. They have 155,000,000 artifacts
and 1% of those are on display. One percent, 99% of the
artifacts that the Smithsonian has you and I don't have access
to. And we're talking about people
with with with with millions of square feet, 4040 square miles
of real estate that they that they are in charge of.
Unbelievable. Now, I did find a short article
and I'll tell you what, it's hard to find anything written on
this. They've done a great job
scrubbing the Internet about everything from giants to
Egyptian artifacts found in the Grand Canyon.
They really have gotten so much better at scrubbing the Internet
over the last, oh, I don't know, four or five years?
It's, it's hard to find a lot of stuff that you were able to find
easily just a couple of years ago.
I don't know if it's AI doing this or all the spiders as they
call them that just crawl through stuff that's posted.
But really you, you can, you can try to do a Google search on
this, any kind of search really, because they all use Google and
you end up with a dozen results and it's always Snopes or
debunking or this and that. It's almost nearly impossible to
find really a decent unbiased reporting on this.
But I did find one halfway decent article here from
vocalmedia.com written by Ruka Nova.
It says published 3 months ago. 3 minute read The Smithsonian
Conspiracy and that it says, are they hiding evidence of giants
and lost civilizations? What if America's most trusty
museum is guarding the greatest archaeological secret of all
time? It goes down, it says.
For over a century, strange reports have surfaced from dusty
newspaper clippings, suppressed research papers, and eyewitness
accounts. Giant skeletons 7-8 even 12 feet
tall, uncovered in burial mounds, caves and ancient ruins
across North America. But these bones, they always
seem to vanish, and time and again, one name keeps popping
up, the Smithsonian Institution. Coincidence or a deliberate
cover up to keep a lost chapter of history buried forever?
This is Let's follow the trail. 1800 newspaper clippings giant
skeletons unearth Throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries,
small town newspapers across the US reported bizarre
archaeological finds. New York Times, 1885 Giant
skeletons discovered in Ohio Mound, Saint Louis Dispatch,
1891 Skeletons measuring over 9 feet found in cave, The
Indianapolis News, 1879 Ancient race of giants unearthed by
digging parties. These weren't one offs.
Hundreds of articles described similar discoveries.
Elongated skulls, massive femurs, double rows of teeth and
artifacts to advance for native cultures of the time.
And the strangest part, many articles end with the same
sentence. The bones were sent to the
Smithsonian for further study. And then silence.
Well, it says, why this? Why this Smithsonian?
Founded in 1846, the Smithsonian Institution was created to
advance knowledge and preserve history.
Or maybe it was just created to preserve knowledge and history
from us. But over the decades, critics
and independent researchers have accused it of something else
entirely. Confiscating anomalous
artifacts, suppressing evidence that contradicts official
narratives, silencing voices within the archaeological
community. In 2014, Navarro Hoax claimed
the Smithsonian admitted to destroying thousands of giant
skeletons in their early 1900's. The story was debunked, but the
attention it received revealed A deeper truth.
Millions of people already believed this could be real.
So is there a fire behind the smoke?
One of the most intriguing pieces of this puzzle is the
story of the Mound of the Mound Builders, ancient cultures that
built massive earthworks across the Midwest to South.
Mainstream archaeology links them to Native American
societies like the Adina and Hopewell, but early European
settlers found legends of a race of giants, known by some tribes
as the Alaghiwi, who built the mounds and were later wiped out.
The largest skeletons were found inside mountain tombs.
They wore artifacts made of copper, mica and unknown alloys.
Many had abnormally large skulls and jaw bones.
Again, these finds were supposedly sent to the to the
Smithsonian. Where are they now?
What? How would you know?
I mean, you've got millions of square feet.
They could be anywhere there, couldn't they?
Several modern researchers have come forward with disturbing
claims. David Hatcher Childress, author
of Ancient Aliens, author and Ancient Aliens contributor,
claims that the Smithsonian archaeologist systematically
destroyed bones that didn't match evolutionary theory.
Funny thing, you know David Childress has been talking about
this all over the place, but if you do a search on Smithsonian
cover up, none of this stuff comes up.
Pretty wild, isn't it? Jim Vieira, featured on Search
for the Lost Giants, collected over 1000 newspaper clippings
and spoke with descendants of dig teams who allegedly saw
bones disappear into Smithsonian trucks.
Richard Dewhurst, author of The Ancient Giants Who Ruled
America, asserts that a hidden Smithsonian directive was put in
place to discredit giant skeleton discoveries as myths or
misidentifications. While none of these claims have
been confirmed by mainstream sources, the pattern of
disappearance is hard to ignore. Then ask why the Giants If real,
these findings would challenge Darwinian evolution timelines,
official narratives about the peopling of the Americans, and
religious and historical texts accounts of giants on Earth.
Yeah, it would be evidence that what the Bible says is correct,
and I really don't think those people want that.
It would also raise deeper questions.
Who are these people? What were they?
Human, hybrid? Something else?
Well we're talking about Nephilim again where they
connected to advanced pre flood civilizations like Atlantis or
Lemuria. And worst of all it might expose
a massive scientific blind spot or worse, intentional deception.
Now it says mainstream response totaled silence.
The Smithsonian has consistently denied all allegations of
suppression. Most archaeologists dismiss the
giant theory as misidentified Mastodon bones, exaggerated
journalistic errors, or pseudoscience fueled by fringe
authors. But here's what they don't
explain Why so many similar discoveries have were reported
in different regions, why the bones never were seen again
after being turned over, and why some Smithsonian records seem to
be missing or sealed. If the theory is so silly, why
is it treated like a national security secret?
Got a good point? Final thoughts?
Are we missing a hidden chapter? Humanity.
Maybe the bones were misidentified.
Maybe the old reports were exaggerated.
Maybe it's all just folklore. But what if it's not?
What if the real conspiracy isn't about proving giants
existed, but about how far institutions will go to keep us
from even asking? Yeah, good questions all the way
around there. If it, if it's just a, if it's
just a made-up thing, then why are we beating so much
resistance from these guys? It seems to me that there's a
lot of a lot of conspiracy going on here.
You have a huge organization, the Smithsonian Institute,
funded to the tune of over a billion dollars a year by
taxpayers. They control thousands and
thousands of acres of real estate buildings and whatnot,
155,000,000 artifacts, of which only 100 of which only a million
and a half that we even have access to, if that.
And then when the president of the United States come along and
says, hey, you need to be just a little bit more patriotic in
your displays because all you're ever doing is cutting down this
country. They cry and cry and cry.
Now I want to finish up with this article here about the
Smithsonian and the possible cover up of Bigfoot.
And this all ties in together Bigfoot, UFOs, giants, because
why? Because it's an alternative to
the Holden Darwinian timeline that we've been given that we've
been given this kind of a new world order way of looking at
things, which to me is just a narrative to keep us in the
dark. Now, this article comes to us
from southernstylesuites.com. It says a Bigfoot cover up.
Why officials might be Heidi Sasquatch How the government
might be covering up Bigfoot. For decades, Bigfoot has
remained one of the most mysterious and debated encrypted
in the world. Thousands of Bigfoot sightings
have been reported. Sasquatch evidence has surfaced
in the form of footprints, hair samples, and even videos.
Yet mainstream science continues to dismiss its existence.
Why? Yeah, funny how every time one
of those hair samples get sent in, it always comes back
inconclusive. Some believe the answer lies not
in the lack of evidence, but in an intentional government cover
up. Could there be classified
information that confirms that Sasquatch is real?
Is there an effort to suppress Bigfoot news and keep the public
in the dark? In this post, we'll examine the
possible ways the government might be covering up Bigfoot and
why they would have a reason to do so.
First, the history of government secrecy and cryptis.
Before diving into how the government may be covering up
Bigfoot, it's important to recognize that secrecy
surrounding unexplained phenomena is nothing new.
UFOs in the US government for years reports that unidentified
flying objects were dismissed as conspiracy theories.
However, recent declassified military footage and
congressional hearings on identified aerial phenomena Uaps
have confirmed that the government has long been aware
of unexplained aircraft in our skies.
The Smithsonian's alleged suppression of giant skeletons
Some theorists claim that the Smithsonian Institution has
destroyed or hidden large humanoid skeletons that don't
fit mainstream history. The government's role in
Wildlife Conservation Agencies like the US Forest Service and
the Department of Interior manage vast wilderness areas
where many Bigfoot sightings occur.
Could they be involved in keeping Sasquatch under wraps?
If governments have kept secrets about UFOs and historical
anomalies, it's not a stretch to consider the possibility that
Bigfoot research is also being being hidden from the public.
Now, why would the government cover up Bigfoot?
There are several compelling reasons why officials might want
to suppress Bigfoot evidence #1 protecting the logging and land
development industry. One of the strongest arguments
for our cover up is the economic impact that acknowledging
Bigfoot's existence would have on industries such as logging,
mining, and land development. If Bigfoot were classified as an
undiscovered primate or endangered species, vast areas
of forested land could become protective zones, limiting
commercial activity. The Endangered Species Act could
be applied, restricting access to regions where Bigfoot
populations might exist. Major corporations that rely on
deforestation could cover could suffer, leading to economic
losses. By keeping Bigfoot in the realm
of myth and legend, industries can continue their operations
without restriction. 2 avoiding public panic and controversy.
Governments have a history of withholding information to
prevent mass hysteria. If Bigfoot's existence were
officially recognized, it could lead to increased public fear
about encountering Sasquatch in the wild, the influx of amateur
researchers or armed hunters searching for Bigfoot,
disrupting national Parks and Wildlife reserves, and legal
debates over hunting laws, conservation efforts, and even
property disputes related to Bigfoot encounters.
By denying the existence of Sasquatch, the government avoids
detailing the dealing with these complications #3 covering up
scientific discoveries, The challenge?
Evolution. If Bigfoot is a relic hominid,
meaning a surviving species of an ancient human ancestor, it
could completely change our understanding of human
evolution. Some Bigfoot researchers believe
Sasquatch can be a surviving population of Gigantopithecus,
an ancient ape species thought to be extinct.
Others speculate that Bigfoot might be a remnant of
Neanderthals or an entirely unknown species of primate.
Such discoveries could challenge existing anthropological
theories, leading to a scientific upheaval.
Remember these guys, this is our bread and butter.
They have a narrative. They, they speak that narrative,
they write about it, they create papers.
And so everything that these guys, these so-called
scientists, their whole life revolves, their whole livelihood
revolves around a particular narrative.
And if you come in and disrupt this narrative with Bigfoot,
giants, UFOs, you disrupt their livelihood #4 military and
classified research connections. Another theory suggests that
Bigfoot is not just an unknown primate, but may have
connections to classified military or programs where
genetic experiments. Reports of Bigfoot sightings
near military bases suggests that the government might be
aware of these creatures and actively monitoring them.
Some theories claim that Sasquatch was has supernatural
abilities such as cooking or telepathic communication, making
it a subject of government study.
There have been cases where Bigfoot researchers claim to
have been followed, threatened, or silenced by mysterious
individuals, a classic tactic of government suppression.
Of course, many of us call that men in black.
If Bigfoot is part of an ongoing and secret research program, it
would explain why credible evidence seems to vanish.
How the government might be suppressing Bigfoot evidence
There are multiple ways the government could be keeping the
Sasquatch hidden from the public knowledge controlling the
Bigfoot news and media narratives.
Whenever scientific Sasquatch evidence surfaces, it often is
often dismissed as a hoax or quickly buried in mainstream
media. Could there be an an effort to
discredit legitimate research? Media outlets often focus on
outlandish Bigfoot claims rather than serious scientific
investigations, making the topic seem less credible.
Television programs and documentaries often present
Bigfoot researchers as eccentric enthusiasts rather than
professionals, further dissuading serious inquiry.
Government agencies may be controlling narratives by
discouraging funding for Bigfoot research grants or academic
studies. Secondly, mysterious
disappearances of Bigfoot evidence.
There have been numerous cases of evidence disappearing under
suspicious circumstances. Researchers claim to have
collected hair samples, DNA evidence, and bones, only for
them to go missing or be dismissed by laboratories as
inconclusive. Reports exist of game cameras
and surveillance footage mysteriously malfunctioning are
being wiped clean after allegedly capturing Bigfoot
activity. Some claim that individuals who
have discovered compelling Bigfoot evidence have been
warned to keep quiet or risk personal consequences.
Could agencies like the FBI, CIA, or even the US Forest
Service be involved in confiscating Bigfoot evidence?
3 Restricted access to government lands.
Many Bigfoot sightings occur in protected National Forest
military zones in restricted areas. the US government
controls millions of acres of land, much of which is off
limits to civilians. Areas with frequent Sasquatch
activities, such as the Pacific Northwest and certain parts of
Alaska have vast uncharted regions.
Could there be a classified zone where Bigfoot populations exist,
hidden from public exploration? The idea that Sasquatch inhabits
inhabits remote government land isn't far fetched given that
large undocumented animal species have been discovered in
remote areas before. With advancements in technology,
it's becoming harder to keep secrets in the digital age.
AI driven wildlife tracking and imroved satellite imaging may
eventually uncover Sasquatch habitats.
Independent researchers and crypted enthusiasts continue to
gather big evidence, refusing to let the mystery fade.
And public pressure and government transparency
movements may face agencies to declassify information related
to Sasquatch. Well, I really think if that's
what's going on here with Trump, it's not so much about a
political thing. It's about a transparency thing.
You have this, and it's been reported widely that rumored
that after the Mount Saint Helen's blast that there were
remains, a Bigfoot that were found, you know, charred remains
that were whisked off to the Smithsonian.
Of course, they're going to deny that.
But I do think that there is some hope at least that at least
this stuff's being talked about. And you can see the blending of
what people think of as a museum, which is actually this
giant multi faceted organization that's supposed to be, that's
supposed to be responsible for collecting important artifacts
and displaying them to American people.
But what do they do? They get it over a billion
dollars a year. They have 155,000,000 artifacts.
And we only see a million and a half of those.
And then we're told to go # sand.
If our elected representative asks them to do things
differently and be just a little tiny bit more patriotic, I'd
like to see him be a little bit more patriotic.
But I also like to see a little bit of transparency at the
Smithsonian. I don't think we've seen that
since the thing started about 175 years ago.
Until next time, This is UFO warning over and out.