Hello, and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're talking about an Army base on the moon.
That's correct, an Army base on the moon.
Now, there's been a lot of talk in the media over the last few
days as Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll let it slip on Fox
News that he had recently talked to a former soldier, currently
an astronaut serving on the moon.
His words, not mine. I'm going to play that clip for
you. You can make up your own mind
whether this was just a misstep or what.
We'll ask ChatGPT what it thinks about it, kind of get the
milquetoast politically correct version.
We'll take a look at some of these past efforts and plans by
the Army to actually, when they talked about building a moon
base, look at the possibilities that maybe it's right even
there. And I want to do this in the
context of taking close relationship between Secretary
Dan Driscoll and some stuff that's come up about a
particular relationship he has with a couple of brothers who
actively tried to have the current president impeached.
Why is Trump hiring people that really don't seem to like him?
Or is it just simply, is it just simply that he's a facade for
the deep state? This story goes deep and it's
really, really weird. We're going to try to get to the
basics today and see what in the world is going on with his
potential moon base by the US Army.
Hang on. It's a wild ride.
This segment right here is an interview with Dan Driscoll.
He's the secretary of the US Army, OK.
And he's being interviewed on Fox, and they're just talking
about recruitment levels, preparedness for attacks on the
US, some of the generic stuff. But then he makes this comment
about talking to somebody from the US Army on the moon.
I want you to listen to this. To your point, the Army started
planning this long in advance because what we believe is this
will continue the strength in recruiting and retention that we
have as young Americans across the country get to see all of
the amazing things that the Army has done, whether it's helping
with floods in North Carolina or wildfires in California, or we
talked to an astronaut yesterday who's on the moon, who's a
soldier. Did you hear that?
We talked to an astronaut who's on the moon, who's a soldier.
Now that's wild. I want to play it one more time.
The amazing things that the Army has done, whether it's helping
with floods in North Carolina or wildfires in California, or we
talked to an astronaut yesterday who's on the moon, who's a
soldier, including actually going to war and fighting to
defend the freedoms that are that make our nation so great.
We think this is going to be an incredible opportunity.
Now, I realize that we have astronauts that were soldiers,
but he specifically said who's on the moon.
Now, this is the Secretary of Defense, Dan Driscoll.
Love him or hate him, we hope that he's not so incompetent
that he would just think we had a moon base when we didn't.
It seems like this is some kind of Freudian slip.
We talked to an astronaut who's on the moon that was a soldier.
And why are we having soldiers on the moon?
This leaves so many questions. I want to get a little bit
further into this now. I asked ChatGPT what this was
all about, and of course they're going to give me the most
convenient politically correct answer.
I imagine it's something like this.
It says U.S. Army Secretary Dan Driscoll
appeared on Fox and Friends on June 11th, 2025, where he said,
we talked to an astronaut yesterday who's on the moon,
who's a soldier, and that's what he said.
He said on the moon. This led to widespread confusion
on and online communities, and fact checkers pointed out that
there is no current mission with U.S. military personnel on the
Moon. The Apollo programs ended in the
1970s, and Artemis has not yet placed anyone back on the lunar
surface. Well, at least that we know of.
What Driscoll likely meant was that he had spoken with Army
Colonel and McLean, who is currently aboard the
International Space Station and is indeed a soldier slash
astronaut. It was almost certainly a verbal
slip, he said on the moon when he intended in space on the ISS.
Well, I'm sorry, but I expect a little bit more clarity than
that from the Secretary of the Army.
It goes on and says who is Anne McClain AUS Army officer in NASA
astronaut. She launched on March 14th, 2025
as part of a SpaceX Crew 10 and has spent 294 days in space.
When Driscoll referred to a soldier who fought to defend
freedoms and having the coolest job of any soldier, he was
praising Maclean's service aboard the ISS.
Now yet again we have the government narrative after what
I think could be possibly a truth bomb come come out.
Bottom line says no, there are no U.S.
Army soldiers on the moon right now.
The statement was a misstatement.
Driscoll meant an astronaut soldier on the ISS, not the
moon. The only current soldier
astronaut in space is Colonel Ann McLean aboard the ISS.
Now, this is the opinion that we get from ChatGPT, which I'm sure
has been cleared with NASA. It's the kind of stuff that we
see anytime there's accidental disclosure on these things.
When one of these guys speak out of out of school and then they
have to come up and do a clean up behind them.
I guess I don't know what I'm more concerned about, the fact
that we have a secret military base on the moon or whether we
have a secretary of the Army who's not sharp enough to keep
this under his hat. Now, we know for a fact that the
government has looked into building a moon base for a long
time. There was a thing called Project
Horizon. That's the US Army's secret plan
for a moon base. And this was created in 1959.
And we're told here that in the heat of the Cold War and the
early days of the space race, the United States military
explored ambitious and sometimes astonishing ideas to secure
American dominance to space. Among the most extraordinary was
Project Horizon, a top secret U.S.
Army plan drafted in 1959 to establish a permanent manned
military base on the moon by 1966.
Project Horizon was initiated at the request of Army Ordinance
Missile Command. That's AOMC under the leadership
of General John Medeiros and renowned rocket scientist Doctor
Werner von Braun. What that name should sound
familiar to you? That's the former Nazi rocket
scientist that we brought over here and gave a get out of
prison free card. Both of whom played central
roles in America's early missile and spaces programs.
The study was conducted at Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville,
AL. Well, they had a lot of those
former Nazis down there and outlined and outlined a detailed
of highly speculative path to lunar colonization.
The driving motivation was strategic.
The Moon was the highest ground possible was viewed as the
ultimate military high ground. Establishing a base air would
not only allow early warning of Soviet missile launches and
space activity, but also create a platform for surveillance,
research, and even nuclear weapon deployment if needed.
That's what we need, don't we? Nuclear weapons on the moon?
Who knows, maybe they're already there.
Project Horizon had several key objectives established.
US sovereignty. the US aimed to be the First Nation to
permanently colonize the moon to prevent the Soviet Union from
doing so. Scientific research.
It would serve as a laboratory for scientific studies of the
moon and outer space and military advantage.
The base would act as a potential outpost for deploying
weapons or defending Earth from attacks from space.
According to the plan, the base would be buried beneath the
lunar surface for protection from radiation, meteorites and
potential attack. It was to house 12 soldiers and
scientists, initially expandable to 20 personnel.
The core infrastructure would include living quarters, power
plants, initially chemical, later nuclear communication
facilities, landing and launch pads, and scientific
laboratories. Materials would be launched from
Earth in multiple Saturn class rockets, with over 200 launches
estimated to be needed to transport the 245,000 lbs of
equipment and supplies. The initial landing and
construction phase was to begin in 1964, with the base fully
operational by late 1966. One of the more controversial
aspects of Project Horizon was this discussion of arming the
Moon base with nuclear weapons. While the official tone was
defensive, the planet acknowledged the potential for
the Moon to become a platform for retaliatory or even first
strike capabilities. However, the logistical,
ethical, and legal issues surrounding this idea are never
fully resolved. So you've got a former Nazi and
another guy figuring out how to militarize the moon, and I'm not
so sure that ethical or legal concerns would have meant much
to these guys. Just a thought, though.
Bold. Project.
Horizon faced immense technological and financial
challenges in 1959. the US had only recently launched its first
satellite and had not yet sent a human into space.
The logistics of transporting hundreds of tons of cargo to the
moon, assembling infrastructure in a vacuum, and sustaining
human life in that environment were far beyond contemporary
capabilities. The estimated cost was $6
billion. It's $1959.
Imagine 1959. A dollar could be a silver
dollar worth. What today about on the 2530
bucks or something? So just multiply that 6 billion
by 25 and that would give you the real value of the money
they're talking about there. An astronomical sum for the
time, especially given the speculative nature of the
project. Project Horizon was ultimately
shelved as NASA became the primary civilian space agency.
President Kennedy's 1961 announcement of the Paulo
program shifted focus toward a symbolic moon landing rather
than militarization. The US military's more
aggressive space ambitions were quietly sidelined then, it says.
Legacy and declassification project Horizon remain
classified until the early 1960s.
When it was eventually declassified, it offered a
fascinating glimpse into the military, early space dreams and
a Cold War era thinking. Though never realized a project
foreshadowed debates about the militarization of space, many of
which remain relevant today. In retrospect, Project Horizon
services both a relic of Cold War ambition and a testament to
the visionary, if sometimes overreaching, scope of early
space planning. It remains one of the most
detailed and audacious plans ever devised for colonizing the
moon Well, and you have to wonder if a lot that didn't go
ahead and go forward. Now, I know some people out
there don't believe in the moon landing, say it never happened,
point to a lot of different pictures and things that they
say, divide explanation. Myself, I do believe it happened
because I think they're way past that.
In fact, I've got an an old friend of mine, he's retired Air
Force. He worked down Cape Kennedy.
Now I guess it was probably Cape Canaveral back then.
And he assures me, yes, that they did send people to the
moon. He was there and watched a
couple of the Rockets go off. He worked in the Parks
Department and he said there was just an immense, unimaginable
number of parts that they had to use and I suppose a word to go
into those rockets and everything else.
He's, he assured me it was a massive, massive project.
And there's no way in the world that they could have faked
something that big and they wouldn't have been.
I don't think they would have bothered to have involved
thousands of people that were involved at the low levels like
he was of keeping track of nuts and bolts.
It just wouldn't have been feasible to keep that many
people on the project and to a fake the entire thing.
Secondly, keep in mind we've talked about a company called in
Q Tel on this podcast a few times, a company started by the
Central Intelligence Agency with the express purpose of snapping
up emerging technology so it can be monopolized by the
intelligence community. Who knows what cool inventions
that they've deprived us of. So they are in the business of
creating a parallel society, one that is far advanced and
compared to what we, the plebes experience every day.
And it would not surprise me at all if there was some sort of
advanced space on the moon and maybe had been there for a long
time while the rest of us are told that they have to hire Elon
Musk to fire the Rockets up there.
To my mind, the amount of conspiracy that's happening on a
daily basis to enable the deep state to keep draining our
finances is on a scale that most of us can't even imagine.
Now I'm going to go ahead and look a little bit further just
in some of the cool facts about the moon.
Before we dive into this whole idea of whether or not the Army
actually does have a base on the moon or this Secretary of
Defense Driscoll just happened to be getting a little caught up
in the moment and forgetting what he was talking about.
I asked Chat TV to list 10 strange facts about the moon
because, you know, there's a lot that we don't know about the
moon and a lot that has not been explained.
And it seems like even asking a question sometimes, at least to
accusations of being a conspiracy theorist.
But, you know, just being curious.
There's nothing wrong with being curious.
Now here's the facts that ChatGPT gave me.
It says the moon is drifting away.
The moon is slowly moving away from Earth at a rate of about 1
1/2 inches per year. This is due to the tidal
interactions between the Earth and the moon.
In the distant past, the moon was much closer, and in the
distant future, total solar eclipses will no longer be
possible because the moon will appear smaller in the sky.
That's an interesting idea that we live in the time that we do.
It says it rings like a bell. When NASA deliberately crashed
the lunar module ascent stage into the moon during Apollo 12,
seismic instruments recorded the moon ringing for nearly an hour.
Scientists described the event as the moon vibrating like a
bell, raising questions about its interior structure and
leading to various speculative theories.
I know the moon's a lot smaller than the Earth, but ringing like
a bell for an hour. And that's just from something
that we were able to crash into it.
What's going on here? Some people, some people think
of the moon as actually as some kind of a hauled out spaceship.
The moon is not round. It looks spherical in the sky,
but the moon is slightly egg shaped with the larger end
pointed toward Earth. This is partly due to
gravitational forces and internal tidal effects.
Well if the things hollow inside or if it's ringing, where are
these tidal effects coming from? That's what I don't get.
It says it has moon quakes just like Earth it has moon quakes.
The moon experiences moon quakes.
Some are caused by meteor impacts or thermal explosion
expansion, but others are shallow quakes of unknown
origin, some strong enough to damage a future lunar base.
Now if it's having thermal expansion, that would mean that
it's hot on the inside, and if it's hot on the inside then how
is it ringing on impact? That I don't get?
It says it has no atmosphere but has an exosphere.
The moon doesn't have a breathable atmosphere, but it
has a tiny exosphere made of trace gases like helium, neon,
and hydrogen. It's so sparse that individual
molecules rarely collide. It's pretty thin then, isn't it?
Water exists on the moon. This is something that I think
they denied for a long time, but now they're like, Oh yeah, it's
got water. NASA and other missions have
confirmed that frozen water exists in permanently shattered
craters near the lunar poles. There are also signs of hydroxyl
molecules on the sunlit surface. This discovery has major
implications for future colonization #7 it may have once
had a magnetic field. Unlike Earth, the Moon doesn't
have a global magnetic field today.
But lunar rocks suggest that it once had a magnetic field
billions of years ago, possibly generated by a molten core.
Another mystery about its early evolution, which we have to ask
ourselves, does it even have a core?
It's far side is very different, it says.
Now, remember, the Chinese supposedly sent up a mission
here a few years ago to explore the far side of the moon.
Whether that even happened or not, I don't know, but it's
curious that they did do that. The far side of the moon, often
mistakenly called the dark side, is geologically different from
the side we see. It's heavily cratered and lacks
a large dark basalt plains. Maria found.
Maria found on the near side. Scientists are still debating
why few hemispheres are so different.
I think they that word Maria means sea basically.
So you have these long, flat, open plains on the one on the
side that's nearest Earth lit. And on the dark side, it's just
completely a pockmark with craters.
And says scientists still debating why these two
hemispheres are so different. Yeah.
If those large planes are there because the planet cooled down
and that's what and that's what left the formation, then why
didn't it do it on both sides? It's usually or it's unusually
large for a moon. It says Earth's moon is about
1/4 the diameter of Earth, making it exceptionally large
relative to its planet. Most moons in the solar system
are tiny compared to their host planets.
The size ratio has led to debates about whether the
Earth's moon system should be considered a double planet.
Finally, we're told its origin is still debated.
The leading theory is the giant impact hypothesis, which
suggests the moon formed from debris after a Mars.
A Mars side body, often called Thea, that's THEIA, collided
with the early Earth. However, the moon's exact
composition, very similar to Earth's mantle, makes the story
more complicated than a simple impact.
So what are you telling me there?
I think I when you you get into some of the stuff, you're just
scratching the very top of the surface.
Because even when we get this kind of somewhat generic
information from ChatGPT, it's almost like they're carefully
wording the responses so as not to pique our curiosity.
There's something strange about the moon, and there's something
strange about the Secretary of the Army claiming to have spoken
to a former Army personnel, now currently an astronaut on the
moon. That's what he said.
Let's take a look at another article here.
Now, we know a lot of times these top secret programs are in
development for years if not decades before they actually
come to fruition. And that's why some people think
maybe the base is already there and they just haven't told us.
I mean, why would they? It would be such a sweet secret
to keep from the Chinese and the Russians.
And then it would lead to a whole host of other questions as
to how do they pull it off and why haven't the American
taxpayers been informed about this?
I found this article over at washingtontimes.com.
U.S. military set sights on moon lunar base before end of decade,
Key lawmaker predicts. Well, here it is 2025.
That's five years from now. Key lawmaker says horse has left
the barn on avoiding militarization of space.
They militarize everything else, so I don't know why they
wouldn't now. This article is written by Ryan
Lovelace, The Washington Times, Friday, May 3rd, 2024.
A version of the story appeared in the daily Threat Status It
Says newsletter from The Washington Times.
And then he has a link for that goes on down here.
Says the US military is likely headed to the moon to counter
multiplying threats in space from China and Russia.
A key House Republican predicts space wars no longer appears to
be science fiction for U.S. policy makers.
Representative Ken Calvert, the California Republican who shares
the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee, says he is bracing
for China to militarize the moon and Russia to put a megaton bomb
in low Earth orbit. Well, maybe, maybe we've already
done it. Mr. Calvert told the Hill and
Valley Forums gathering of top tech and government officials in
Washington last week that the US Space Force is likely headed to
the moon as well. I mean, this could be
foreshadowing. Space Force will be actively
involved in, I think, in going to the moon at some point.
That discussion is ongoing, Mr. Calvert said.
Obviously China is probably going to militarize the moon, I
have no doubt. So I suspect we will have a base
on the moon also maybe by the end of this decade.
Now he's talking about it five years from now and the Secretary
of Defense is acting like it's already there.
And they are talking about Space Force being involved in this.
So you're talking about the military.
China is planning its own moon base.
In April, the Chinese National Space Administration published a
video depicting its plans for a lunar base, the International
Lunar Resource Station, broadcast by the state-run China
Global Television Network. I suppose that they can steal
enough chips to get there. China and Russia previously
announced plans for the ILRS and 2021.
By 2035, IRS will build a basic model to implement regular lunar
scientific experiments, technology verification, and in
situ resource utilization. Read English language captions
on the video depicting China's plans to establish a settlement
on the moon. Honestly, you're talking about
two countries that have just their GDP is a fraction of what
the US is. The average salaries in places
like China and Russia are a tiny fraction of of the US.
The standard of living is is way behind.
And so you have to wonder if they could, if their economy
could even support something like this.
Hard enough for EU s s economy to try to support this and
probably couldn't without the immense amount of debt that
we've taken on. Anyway, it goes on and says.
And on Friday, Chinese Spatial Fusions launched a new lunar
probe that is designed to land on the first side of the moon
and return with samples that could provide insights into
differences between the less explored regions and the better
known near site. China's bold plans include an
embarrassing blunder, however. space.com notice that the video
included a rendering of a NASA space shuttle taking off from
the moon's surface, and China's state-run broadcaster then
blurred the shuttle in the video it posted on YouTube.
Yeah, I've seen that. It's kind of a bad cartoon.
Mr. Calvert said he anticipates NASA will miss a target of
returning to the moon between fiscal 2025 and 26, but the
horse has left the barn on efforts to prevent militarizing
space, according to news reports.
Russia is moving forward to put an apparently one megaton bomb
into low Earth orbit, Mr. Carver said.
Sounds like a great idea. And that's basically blackmail
against the rule. If something happens that they
don't agree to that they would threaten to have that bomb go
off. And of course everything on low
Earth orbit would be destroyed because the radiation field it
would create around the world. If detonated, the bomb would
completely shut off space. According to Tom Mueller,
Impulse Space, he who previously helped start SpaceX, the private
rocket design and launch firm. He told the Hill and Valley
Forum that he hoped nobody would be stupid enough to use that
bomb. Well, I think if you look at
back at human history, you will find that our leaders have been
stupid enough to use about any kind of bomb they can get their
hands on. If a large nuclear weapon were
left off in low orbit, not only would the radiation just destroy
everything on that side of the Earth immediately, but then the
collisions of all the debris would continue and it and it and
basically low Earth orbit would be unusable for possibly
decades, Muto said. Dealing in Asperab, a Co founder
of Florida Space Industries and one of the forums organizers
said the moon is an important high ground for the United
States to hold over its adversaries but argue that the
moon is ultimately in some ways the most important civil and
military objective over the course of the next decade.
Mr. Avroz says yeah, what you can see there that the military
does have a very piqued interest in building some kind of base on
the moon and they're telling you that it's for defense against
the Chinese and the Russians. Maybe it's just because they
want to be there. I mean, how could they resist,
right. Let's take a look at this other
article as we talked about whether or not the Army already
has a base on the moon, which is what Dan Driscoll, Chief of the
Army's Chief Army Secretary, seems to be saying.
Although chat cheap ET and Yahoo and the rest of us tell us that
it was simply a slip of the tongue.
It seemed pretty intentional to me and a lot of other folks.
The slash articles from dailymail.co.uk and it's got a
link to the video here that I played earlier for you and I
think it's like a 5 minute long segment they put up.
It says Trump official drops world altering revelation and
live interview as viewers call it worst slip up ever.
Yeah, close, close to I think it was a Victoria Newland in the
interview and the Senate committee a few years ago with
Marco Rubio when he tried he tried to give her an out for
letting us all know that there were no bioweapon labs in
Ukraine. And she confirmed that there
were in fact bioweapon labs there before the Russian
invasion. I don't know about these guys.
Sometimes I think they're a lot Dumber than people think.
And that's almost more concerning that if they weren't
that dumb. Anyway.
Article here's written by Stacy Laboratory for dailymail.com.
Date on this is June 12th, 2025. AUS Army official may have
accidentally dropped what some are calling the greatest 40th
slip ever. U.S.
Army Secretary Dan Driscoll was enthusiastically promoting the
Army's upcoming 250th anniversary parade set to take
place in Washington, DC this Saturday.
When he said America has a soldier station on the moon, he
said it. You heard it.
Driscoll highlighted the Army's wide range of missions, from
responding to natural disasters to what the Internet is calling
a the start of lunar militarization.
The country gets to see all of the amazing things that America
has done, he said, Whether it's helping with floods in North
Carolina or wildfires in California or we talked to an
astronaut yesterday who's on the moon, who's a soldier.
Yeah. Well, I kind of remember those
floods in North Carolina. That was, of course, during the
Biden administration. And I remember seeing very, very
little help there from the Army, at least not until Trump got in.
So, I mean, he didn't bring that up.
I have some reservations about this guy, honestly.
Driscoll's comment appears to have confused the moon with
NASA's International Space Station.
I mean, if he's that incompetent, should he be in
charge of the Army? As he spoke to Army Colonel and
McClain, a NASA astronaut currently stationed aboard the
ISS this week? However, the remark, made during
a live Fox News interview, was brief with no follow up details.
But it did not take long for social media to ignite with
speculation as this has been all over Twitter.
Did he just slip up? Is it more Pentagon
disinformation? That is quite the statement to
make one user run on X. Others speculated whether the US
military is quietly expanding its presence in space amid
growing competition with Russia and China for supremacy.
While the Army official has not commented on his statement,
neither NASA or the military have released information
stating there is a human on the moon.
That leads us to ask, could this possibly be some kind of a
cookie crumb material he's leaving.
Driscoll is the 26th Secretary of the Army, sworn in on
February 25th following his nomination by President Donald
Trump in confirmation by the Senate.
His role is to oversee operations, modernization and
resource allocation for nearly 1,000,000 active Guard and
Reserve soldiers and more than 265,000 Army civilians.
dailymail.com has reached out to Driscoll for comment.
A video Driscoll has gone viral on X after he casually claimed
the Army recently spoke to a soldier on the moon.
Greatest for you slip ever. Soldier on the moon 1 user
posted and another added. What the expletive did I just
hear? Some recalled that the US once
proposed building a military leader base during the Cold War
following the Soviet Union's launch of Sputnik first in 1957.
American military leaders, particularly in the Air Force,
explored the idea of lunar landings and even permanent
outposts on the moon. But Driscoll's comments were
likely recounting the discussion with McCain on Monday, which she
shared her life aboard the orbiting lab and her pride in
serving both NASA and in the Army.
Driscoll, impressed, told her. Colonel, when I took this job,
one of the things everybody told me was you will not believe the
number of things that the US Army and its soldiers do.
Yeah, and nearly every day I've been surprised by something new.
But you have absolutely taken a cake for having the coolest and
most unique job of any soldier I've talked to you so far.
McCain also acknowledged the Army's upcoming 250th
anniversary celebration, expressing her pride in being
part of the milestone. The anniversary parade, which
coincides with Trump's birthday, is set to feature a dramatic
display of military might in the nation's capital.
Tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles, strikers and other
armored units will roll through the capital way.
Army aircraft are expected like them to sort overhead.
It's going to be a parade the likes of which I don't know if
we've ever had a parade like that.
It's going to be incredible, Trump said this week.
And then goes on and finishes up with that.
Well, and there you have it, a soldier on the moon.
It still leaves us with a lot of questions about what in the
world is actually going on here. There are some things that make
me very suspicious of Secretary of the Army Daniel Driscoll.
I just want to finish up with this because this whole thing
just reeks of deep state and deep state conspiracy and
unfortunately it seems like Trump just cannot figure it out.
I follow Laura Loomer on X, formerly Twitter, and she's
mostly conservative, a real bulldog on on finding out what's
going on. She has this post on x.com.
It says what is going on? Why is the Secretary of the Army
Daniel Driscoll, hanging out with Trump Hater Y Vindman,
Eugene Vindman, and thanking him for joining the kickoff
celebration for the Army's 250th birthday today?
Eugene Vindman and his twin brother, Alexander Vindman
testified in the impeachment trial against President Donald
Trump. This is shameful and Secretary
of the Army should apologize to Trump for including the Trump
hating Vindman in his post today.
Now you would have to be under a rock if you're in DC and the
last five years and didn't realize that Alexander Vindman
said some things about Donald Trump that weren't very nice and
really seemed like he was doing his level best to have him
impeached. So why is Trump's nominee,
Trump's appointee to the Secretary of Defense, chumming
around with the very guy who was in cahoots with his 10 twin
brother, both Ukrainians by birth?
What kind of subterfuge is going on here?
Does that seem normal to you? I mean, And secondly, why isn't
Trump smart enough to pick people for these top jobs that
haven't tried to stab him in the back?
Or is this whole thing a giant, a giant act?
It's just a cover for the real powers, power of the deep state?
I don't know. Now, I don't want to get too far
to this whole thing between Driscoll and Veneman.
It's so weird. But I will just say that I found
an article from December 12th, 2024, Virginia O 7, that's
District 7 Congressman elect Eugene Veneman endorses
Spanberger for governor of Virginia.
So it says. US Representative elect Eugene
Vindman today endorses US Representative Abigail
Spamberger to serve as the 75th governor of Virginia.
In November 2824, voters in Virginia's 7th District elected
Vindman to succeed Spamberger as her voice in the US House of
Representatives and his endorsement, Vindman reflected
on how Spamberger's record of results and Congress, reputation
for bringing people together, and her tested leadership skills
will make her an effective governor.
OK, fine. They're on the other side of the
aisle. But what I don't get is why this
Secretary of the Army, Dan Driscoll's going out of his way
to seemingly power people who have come out openly and from
what I can tell, or sworn enemies, the commander in chief
that he's supposed to be hired by.
Weird stuff. So the whole thing is just a
tangled spider web. And This is why.
Just situations like this, people say, well, it's a
conspiracy that just goes a step too far to believe that we could
actually have a military base on the moon.
Honestly, when you think about the fact that Donald Trump, for
whatever reason, is nominating and appointing people to the
Secretary of Defense that active, that are friends with
the people who actively tried to get him impeached and
incarcerated, he's doing if he's that out of touch or he's that
out of the loop, But I think it's a very real possibility
that we could have major military installations on the
moon and he wouldn't even have a clue.
It's almost as if they want a president, and by they, I mean
the deep state, want a president in the White House that's
completely malleable by then. He can be comatose or not
comatose. He just has to be able to get
enough of the population to move in the general direction that
they want to go so they can continue to exploit whatever
alien technology they've got their hands on.
I find this whole thing very concerning and a little bit
disturbing. But when I talk about this, it's
not that I'm trying to take one side or the other.
Simply want to point out the rot and the rot in Washington, DC.
People like Representative Timber Chef talked about this
and it's from top to bottom inside out.
So when we hear the word conspiracy, what I think is
really what's going on there, it's projection by the people
that are committing the conspiracies, the conspiracy to
rob us every last time we've got and to deprive us and whatever
cool technology that there is available out there.
And to also prevent us from knowing whatever possible
dangers might exist from these entities, whatever they are,
interventional, extraterrestrial or possibly even on the moon.
Until next time, This is UFO warning over and out.