Hello and welcome to the program, you'll fall morning and
this episode, we're talking about 10 questions for the UFO
hearing, that's correct 10 questions for the UFO hearing.
Now, this article that we're going over comes to us from the
hill.com, and I bring it up because this is the kind of
softball nonsense that you're going to be hearing in that
hearing after I go through this article, I want to talk about
five, real questions that I would ask, but you can bet your
bottom dollar. Dollar will not be asked in that
hearing. So let's begin with the article.
It's written by Mary, Pavan Rincon, cough opinion,
contributors dated April 17th. 2023 title says, 10 key. 10 key
questions for this week's historic, UFO hearing starts
office is a bipartisan group of lawmakers is doubling down on
solving the decades-old UFO mystery on Wednesday.
The Senate armed services, subcommittee on emerging Threats
and capabilities will hold the second hearing on the phenomena
and over 50 years Congressional interest in UFOs.
Also known as an identified anomalous phenomena knows how
they changed the term there. Yet again, it was on a diet,
unidentified aerial phenomena. Now it's unidentified anomalous.
Phenomena or you APS sirs. Following the 2017 publication
F. Eyebrow-raising video is
recorded by Navy fighter jets. Briefings by Naval aviators.
Who witnessed the mysterious objects maneuvering in
extraordinary ways, subsequently, paved the way for
groundbreaking UAP related legislation, notice how the
author of this article completely ignored, the chain of
custody issues, with those videos, the ridiculous way in
which they were leaked out. And the fact that we still
haven't got straight answers about that.
Because on a says, as a result, the Department of Defense
established the all domain anomaly, Lucien office, that's a
Aro importantly, Congress. Granted, the office, sweeping
authority to scientifically analyze UFOs.
That exceed the known state of the Art and Science or
technology, quote unquote to cut through several layers of
bureaucracy, lawmakers, mandated that a a arroz director report
to top Pentagon and intelligence Community leadership.
Now we know what a joke that is, because as we've seen recently,
there's some question, is, this has this thing even been funded.
They had the dod. I don't know if it's department
head or, or the runner-up to the department head of DOD.
And Senator, I believe, Gilder brand, was grilling him about
this and he more or less just said, well, we set up an office
like you told us to they're clearly Slow Rolling them on
this. They're taking their time, there
are just pushing back against Congress, hoping that maybe a
couple of these guys would get elected out of office next term,
and they could just go on about Covering up a hiding the UFO
phenomenon like they've been doing for the last 70. 75 years,
my opinion, the goes on and says that you APS office offices
director will be be sole witness at Wednesday's Herring as such
lawmakers will, likely ask about administrative matters to
include ensuring the aaro has a necessary funding to execute its
scientific Mission. What can have all the funding in
the world. But if that funding setting a
bank somewhere and some DOD, Expense account and it's not
being put to work. What good is it doing?
Secondly, why not bring the dod people in with him?
Let's let's let's go ahead and have a real investigation into
this thing. Why do we need to talk to one
point man to set there and just Mumble through a two or
three-hour hearing where, you know, less when you start than
you did before, you had the hearing for their part.
It says, Republican senators are likely to sharply, criticized
the Biden administration's response to the Chinese
surveillance balloon Down off the US Coast and February.
Now this is from the hill so they have to politicize this
thing immediately. No reason to do that but you
know, that's what they do. So as says, but few federal law,
but Federal Law requires a Aro to analyze unidentified
anomalous phenomena. Since the US intelligence
analyst track the massive Chinese surveillance balloon
from lunch and even watched as unusual weather blew it office
intended course, that's a lie. I don't know that they didn't
even pick up on this thing. Tell whenever why owe me.
So how are they now? They're coming out until I'm
telling us that they knew about it when it was launched.
Even though it went over all kinds of military and nuclear
installations, this is a pretty sloppy reporting.
Pretty propaganda is reporting the balloon incident, therefore
is not a relevant, topic of a discussion for hearing focused
on aaro and it's not really a worthy topic of discussion but
this article but the author Away some time on it.
It goes on and says, moreover Pentagon analyst monitored a
small number of trump era encourages.
Here you go again with more this political nonsense you know the
guys been out of office for two-and-a-half friggin years.
Do you have to keep blaming everything on him?
I wouldn't care if Obama was the last president, or Clinton was
the last president, where George Bush was the last president, at
some point when you're in the office, I'm sorry.
But you have to take responsibility and they are not
taking responsibility for For these incursions from you APS,
or UFOs or whatever you want to call them.
And you can say the same thing about Trump, let him own what he
did, what he was in there, but this is a new Administration so
own what happened while you were on staff goes on and says, but
since the objects were officially unidentified, the
reports were not disseminated beyond the tight Circles of
intelligence officials leaving senior policymakers in the dark.
This is more crap. They're trying to say that the
same thing happened with Trump, but they kept, they kept
everything. To themselves.
And the only difference is, is that by, you know, being the
great decision maker that he is, he went out there and shot three
of these things down and spent two or three million dollars to
do it. Well, we still haven't got
pictures and secondly, if these things were UFOs, that their way
beyond anything, we have that could have been diplomats from
another galaxy for all, you know, you morons.
Why would you shoot him down for that's asinine stupid to do
that. So to say that Trump was somehow
at fault for not shooting. Ting down.
UFOs makes no sense. You know, this would be like
this would be like, Native Americans firing on the first
settlers who had muskets with bow and arrow instant death
penalty. Do we really want to attack some
some other incurring Force? That's light years.
Ahead of us in technology. Does that seem like a smart
thing to do? Wouldn't it be a little bit more
intelligent? It's just to study these things
for a bit before we start World War Three with ET.
Crying out loud. Senators participating in this
week's hearing should focus instead on Military reports of
the unknown craft exhibiting extraordinary flight coaster at
characteristics. They may consider asking
questions such as and then they say of the 500 plus u, AP
reports by service members in recent years.
How many how many describe remarkable flight
characteristics? Does a Aro have high confidence
that any UAP exhibit highly advanced technology multi-max
just a stupid question. And we know that a bunch of them
are so unusual, that they can't be defined as anything but a
UFO, okay? So yes, it's highly advanced
technology. This this is a deep State.
This is a deep State Roundtable for a limited hang out.
This is this is the kind of crap that you're going to be hearing
tomorrow. Okay, number two, are the
objects and the now-famous gimbal, go fast and Fleur one
UAP videos still unidentified. If so, what are the, a a arroz
working theories for them? And then he Rambles on about
this. Look, of course, they're still
unidentified, but that's not the important question.
The important questions to be how were these things lead to
the public who are the actors involved?
And why did Tom delong's company?
Get and end up with a couple of these, which they watch, they
were allowed to Splatter The Watermark of their Academy to
the Stars company, all over them, monetize them on video,
and make Like who knows how much money off of them.
The important question about those videos is the chain of
custody issue, okay, the quality is so bad that we know we're not
getting the grade A material, we're getting some kind of a
dumbed-down version. What we need to know about those
videos is who are the actors and the release of those videos.
We know this has been around for years that there's no Revelation
there. It only confirmed what we
already know. Number three, says rigorous
verifiable public analysis of a Navy videos, confirmed, I'm
fighter pilot accounts that the objects exhibited highly
advanced technology as a Aro of where these open source
assessments. Oh, come on, do you think
they'll watch television? I mean, this guy, you see he's a
smart one, isn't he? Of course, there are aware.
They've been aware for 70 freaking years they've been
talking about heck. Joel for couldn't get answers
back in the 1960s. When he asked about this stuff,
you need to have this up. Declassified, we need to know
what happened to the rest of the videos off these Navy.
All Ships. Where did they go ahead?
We know they've got the video for crying out loud.
Just give us a video of the three of UFOs that they shot
down in February. They won't even do that.
And then the nonsense question. Okay.
On the number 4 has a Aro characterized.
The UAP observed often via multiple sensors by dozens, of
Naval aviators off the US East Coast in recent years.
If not, what is a arroz working hypothesis for these highly
anomalous. Encounters.
And answer the question number four, of course, they have,
they've told us as much, they've told us that they have confirmed
reports of UFOs that they have been observed from the ground or
the deck of the ship from radar. Okay.
Mechanically through radar from the fire pilot himself herself
when the approach them and from the satellite imagery sir.
You're talking about four different eyewitnesses four
different sets of eyes on the UFO at the same time and they
have it. They Other reports, they have
the images that they have, all the data everything.
So this is another question that doesn't need to be asked because
we already know the answer to it.
Number 5 and strike at a striking development, a, our
director dr. Sean Kilpatrick recently
co-authored scientific paper theorizing.
The Extraterrestrial probes may be drawn to water on Earth
surface to what extent did you AP encounters?
The most compelling of which occurred over water?
Informed. This groundbreaking paper man.
I just think I want to puke. This is just more.
This this is just more garbage thrown in the stew.
Who cares, about some stupid paper theorizing that UFOs, come
here for water. There's plenty of time to talk
about that and theorize about that.
We need actual answers. We need actual images provided
to us by the Air Force. The Navy in the military of that
they have captured of these UFOs, okay?
The need to quit line and produce it evidence and not pass
it off in a brown paper bag to have form.
Her Pentagon employee from a current Pentagon employee to be
monetized by some for-profit, nonprofit, whatever group.
Okay, we need to disclosure and we need transparency.
And we don't really care about some theoretical paper written.
This meaningless to us. We need answers number six.
Do you agree with former Decker? Director of intelligence, John
Radcliffe statement that you a piece possess technologies that
the United States does not have and frankly that we are not
capable of Defending against wider, right?
Why not? I just wish that Ratcliffe could
have told us everything he knew without have his head blown off
without being wet weathered. Because if you watch the
interview with that man it is clear that, you know, something
and he's really concerned about About it, I don't know.
He could start with the cattle mutilations maybe and the human
abductions in the implants. Number seven, last week, space
Force, Major John Olson. Stated that UAP encounters, have
occurred at globally. Could you provide additional
context? Be assured?
They will not, but we don't need the military.
Tell us we have YouTube, Facebook and Twitter, people are
posting pictures, all the time. Number eight, how many arrows
500-plus cases involve detections by multiple sensors,
including satellite or other space-based systems.
Well asked NASA, they've got two main pictures of the moon at
they won't release little own pictures of Suppose we know that
these things are constantly being photographed by
satellites, that's why you're constantly being blacked out.
And the pictures that we see number 9, how many UAP related
videos and images are in possession?
Well, probably not too many because see, there are joke
department created in response to an order from Congress, which
the d-o-t doesn't really give a rat's behind about, because I
can just move all this stuff over and do the some
off-the-books department or NGO our company, and you're not
going to say it. Anyway, so another question that
doesn't need to be asking number 10.
The US government has a long history of triumphantly
highlighting resolved. You AP reports while ignoring
downplaying or Force fitting scientifically observe
explanations on to compelling. UAP cases recent, press reports
suggest that this may be occurring again.
What steps will AR o take to prevent this What does it
matter? Because the aaro is just one
little department and as far as we know, it only has a single
employee right now. What steps will you take to
prevent this? They're not the ones doing it.
So how could they prevent it? When they have the entire deep
state in the bottom paid for media working against them?
They've been depressing people since before 1947 they've been
threatening and intimidating people since before Roswell.
So to think that the aaro a suddenly going to be able to
have some sort of an impact on this is quite frankly.
Lee childish. Now, there are some questions
that I personally would like to ask myself about this whole
situation that I think the questions do bear answering and
probably are a lot more impactful than the questions
that are presented by the author for the hill.
The first thing I would like to ask mr.
Kirkpatrick from Aro is have you made contact in fact as anybody
in the defense department and Department defense or the Deep
state made contact with These thanks, and if you have, let's
talk about that because if you make contact with them and you
are you already having some sort of conversation or maybe it's
just been some sort of passing in the hallway.
We as American people need to know about it.
Secondly I'd like to know can we talk about abductions?
What evidence do you have on the abductions?
We know that people have been reporting for many many years.
Years that they have been abducted by these things.
What's going on? We need some answers on this.
This is this is unleashing in many cases, psychological trauma
on the people at this, has been done to everything from
mind-boggling unhuman experiments being done on them.
Two people were people many people reporting that there's
some sort of alien breeding program gone on if this is the
case, Really, we need to talk about it second thing, but you
say, you don't believe in inductions.
Let's talk about alien implants. Now we've had, we've had plenty
of these things, taken out of people, containing metals, and
metal alloys that are not a from this world.
Some cases, not even in this galaxy, they're clearly
communicating was some source that they are a real thing.
Okay. Found in people who've often
claimed to have been abducted. Just normal people going about
their business. Ending up with these things in
their body. Not happy about it.
Have you done any Research into this into this alien implant
phenomena? Have you doing one bit of
scientific research? It ties in with the work that
was done. It recently at Berkeley where we
find out that hundreds of people have died when they come in
contact with you. If I'm in a material that goes
on and said I would ask them, what about the cattle
mutilations, what's going on with these things?
Thousands and thousands of these things that mutilated over the
last 30 years, I have over 10,000.
But yet we have no answers, not a single, not a single satanic
cow. Tipper has been arrested, not
one you come out, you come upon these mutilations and there's no
blood in the ground, not a single drop of blood.
No tracks around inexplicably. Butylated ritualistically
mutilated frequently paired with UFO.
Sightings what do you know, about cattle, mutilations mr.
Kirkpatrick. I liked.
I asked him about UFO, crashes and crash material.
Do you do you know of any legitimate, UFO crashes, other
than Roswell? And are you in position of the
crash material? Because Tom DeLonge says he is
okay. He certainly says he is, he's
got some of it. They've been trying to reverse
engineer it into production of Tanks or when they make some
camouflage material out of it. That was the word a couple of
years ago. So what's going on with his
crash material? Is it in your hands?
Or are they Pawn this off already?
I like they didn't like they did other stuff to some Corporation
or NGO or some very Department somewhere.
We want the truth about UFO, crashes and crash material,
because this is something that affects all of us.
And finally, the last thing I want to ask one, just, I guess
it ties. The whole thing together is
reverse engineering. What do you know about reverse
engineering? We've heard so much about it
over the years. The reverse engineering one of
these machines has the potential to destroy the world or change
the world. I see record corbel and and
Knack or saying that they have proof that the Russians have
reverse-engineered. You have a weapon systems.
That's concerning. Have you reversed have we
reversed UFO, weapon systems mr. Kirkpatrick have reverse the
power to bring a medical freedom.
Country, have we reversed engineered UFOs to gain
advantages in our energy economy from these things.
Because if there's some sort of Technology here that's been
reverse-engineered, the people that know about it, have a
exponential advantage over the people that don't know about it.
So, before the prophets are all Hoarded into the pockets of 10
or 12 people. Maybe we can share that with the
rest of society. Maybe we could spread the wealth
a little bit instead of turning our country into even more of an
oligarchy. So, tell us mr.
Kirkpatrick Have we reversed engineered UFO craft and
finally, could you please stop lying to us.
We've had enough, we've had so many lies around.
This stuff is so much, false hope and so many people think
that they're going to get disclosure from these meetings.
But I hate to tell you, I have zero hope for disclosure what I
see happening. Tomorrow is 10 silly, stupid
questions being asked by people who just follow along, believe,
whatever, they're told, where they're told to put on a mask.
Scored to turn their head the other way because what was shot
down over the Yukon was nothing more than a party balloon.
Okay. Time to grow up and ask the hard
questions that deserve to be answered questions.
Like, have we made contact? What about the abductions?
What about the cattle mutilations?
What about the human implants? What about the UFO crash
material? And what about the reverse
engineering? Those are the kind of hard
questions that we deserve answers to and we have not got a
single answer to any of these from the deep state or any one
of these half a dozen, alphabet agencies that they have created
to pretend like they are investigating the UFO phenomena.
Until next time, this is UFO warning over now