Hello, and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're talking about UFO Disables Nuclear
Missile. That's correct, UFO Disables
Nuclear Missile. Now, that headline might be just
a tiny bit misleading. The fact is is that this was a
story about a UFO that disabled a nuclear missile, but it wasn't
armed with a nuclear warhead. Thankfully, the story happened
back in 1964. We've talked about it before,
but I think this article does such a good job of explaining
what happened and talking about some of the people that were
involved and that are still around and are talking about it
today. The first article comes to us
from thesun.co.uk. I'll have these listed over at
Kofi and at Locals. You can take a look at the links
over there. It begins by saying from beyond.
Mystery video shows disk shaped UFO intercept and disable
nuclear missile with laser beams whistleblower claims.
And then it goes on and says one of the officers who saw the UFO
wrote a letter describing it as articles by Olivia.
All of a sudden and is dated February 13th, 2024, the US
military is in possession of video footage showing a UFO
intercepting and disabling a nuclear missile with laser
beams. According to the whistleblowers,
retired US Air Force officers say the disc shaped object
circled an unarmed dummy warhead during a routine test after a
detached from an Atlas missile booster.
It's got a really cool diagram here and this happened out in
California. It says UFO sighting.
Former two US Air Force officers claimed there is a video showing
a UFO blasting a missile. This is First off, the missiles
launched from the air base. This is in California.
This thing goes up in the air. Secondly, it says UFO appears as
warhead detaches. Now there's a simulation, this
video floating right out there. It's kind of interesting this
this UFOI guess is the best you could call it.
It's not really even distinct on the video but starts to circle
this missile as it's you know blasting off the launchpad into
a space. It says UFO blast 4 laser beams
at the warhead. So it's it's attacking the
warhead itself and then it says the nuclear warhead is disabled.
Now from stories I've read, there actually was not a nuclear
bomb on board this thing, but this was a nuclear missile.
They were testing it to see if they could release like multiple
nuclear weapons at the target. It goes on, it says they said
the UFO set out the beam of light and then they have a an
illustration of that down below. They got a picture of these guys
that were involved. It says ex first Lieutenant in
US Air Force Robert Jacobs, pictured middle bottom row with
his crew. This is a guy that's one of the
whistleblowers on this thing, it says.
Lieutenant Bob Jacobs and Major Florenz Manson say they saw the
recording of the 1964 interview before the tape mysteriously
disappeared. The former officials were part
of a team responsible for capturing footage of missile
test launches in California with telescopic photography and video
equipment. So these are the guys that are
filming this missile to make sure it's working properly.
And evidently, it didn't. After this UFO got involved, 2
days after they recorded the video, they say that two
plainclothed CIA agents confiscated the clip and ordered
them to keep quiet. Some UFO experts have identified
a pattern where UFOs seem to interfere with nuclear weapons.
Now of course we know this has been talked about a lot and we
you know, I've talked to her in the program about how Ariel was
supposed to investigate this stuff, but it's just seemed like
more of a cover up and and a shutdown than anything that says
USUS weapons officer Robert Salas previously claimed a UFO
shutdown 10 missiles in a bizarre incident in 1967.
And now the new Whistler have revealed another UFO encounter
which they claimed happened on September 15th in 1964.
Actually, these guys aren't new. They told the story for quite a
while and have been paying attention.
You know, the story's been around for a while.
It has now been thrown in the spotlight due to an
investigation by author Robert Hastings.
According to a post made by Hastings on the UFO Chronicles
website earlier this month, former intelligence officer
Louis Elizondo claimed to also seen the video.
Wow, it almost seems like maybe Louis kind of latching on here a
bit. I'm not even sure why he would
claim to have seen that. This story's been around for a
while. Pretty Louie, I believe.
We can look it up, but. But this is not something that
just came off the presses yesterday.
Elizondo says he has a former he was a former director of the
Pentagon's Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program to
study UFOs. And I remember this happened in
1964. I don't think Lee was even born
yet. He says he has been involved in
several high profile leaks of military footage allegedly
showing UF OS. I also have a problem with that,
he says. He's been involved in several
high profile leaks. Everything I've read on Louis is
that he's, even though he's retired intelligence, he still
has to go back and submit to these polygraph tests.
So anything that he would be involved with leaking.
That means that the deep state cleared it to be leaked,
otherwise he'd be locked up for leaking state secrets, right?
An anonymous source revealed to Hastings at Elizondo confirmed
the details of the event in an internal interview.
In the 1960s, Jacobs was at the helm of a military telescopic
photography site in Big Sur, CA. The site captured a video as the
missile blasted through the air, traveling several thousand mph
over the Pacific Ocean. At the time, management was the
chief photographic imagery analyst at Vandenberg Air Force
Base, now called Vandenberg Space Force Base in Santa
Barbara County, California. The Cold War was progressing,
testing sophisticated and secret military hardware, and some UFO
skeptics have claimed that reports of UFOs provided cover
for these tests. Here you go.
Appeal to authority, I guess some UFO skeptics, and that's
pretty general. I'm not even sure why you would
include that in the article. The craft caught on camera was
domed and disc shaped, according to Jacobson and Manson.
In a letter Manson wrote about the sighting.
He said it was a classic disc. The center seemed to be a raised
bubble. The entire lower saucer shape
was glowing and seemed to be rotating slowly, he added.
At that point of beam release, the object turned like an object
required to be in a position to fire from a platform.
But again, this could be my own assumption for being in aerial
combat 40 years later. AUS Senate Investigator told
Hastings that Elizondo had confirmed his description in an
official interview last year. Well, Louis Elizondo, I mean,
he's like the Forrest Gump of UFOs or something here.
I mean, this story's been around for years and years.
It says this is not new news if you haven't heard of it.
I mean, I've talked about this in the podcast, I don't know, a
couple years ago probably. And it's been around a long time
before I found it. So I don't know why it's become
news. Because Louis Elizondo says, Oh
yeah, I was there. I saw that.
I mean, definitely. He's gumping us here in a big
way during that, in my opinion. During that briefing, the former
A A Tip director confirmed the existence of the video, the
details regarding what it showed, and the location of a
copy of it in a tips workspace, Hastings wrote in the New Post.
Although Manson told Jacobs not to discuss what they had seen,
Jacobs begin to talk about the event in 1982 as he thought
enough time had passed and he could speak freely.
So he's been talking about this since 1982.
And did Louis just now decide to reveal that he saw the actual
video? I don't know.
I'm. I'm thinking of Forrest Gump and
those you know that that that video, Forrest shaking hands
with John F Kennedy and doing the ping pong thing in China.
And yeah, pretty amazing, Louis. I guess next we'll find out that
he was at Roswell. Maybe maybe he's seen the video
on that but this. But his claims were dismissed by
skeptics and he was even subjected to harassment and
death threats. Hastings new report appears to
match with Elizondo's recollection of the video.
Can you see what they're doing here?
They're they're taking Louis and they're they're saying, OK, this
guy was a a photographer at this missile test site back in 1964.
He tells you that he saw this missile launched.
They were doing they were testing out this new launching.
You know that cone that contains the missiles.
I don't as I said, I don't believe there were actual
nuclear warheads in there. They were just, they were just
doing a proof of have a concept test basically to see if they
could launch these nuclear weapons, multiple weapons out of
this warhead 1964 new thing. And the guy saw he, he's
watching this on this telescopic camera and they see this flying
squasher come in and they see it shoot that warhead that you know
the tip of the missile four different times just blasting it
off of there. Now that's where he's been
around for a long time now. Now all of a sudden we're told
that the original witness that we can believe him because
Elizondo has confirmed the recording, this video recording
of this this tape of this that this guy's told us about for
years and years. I I really don't think I need
Louis Elizondo to confirm anything.
I mean, why are they putting this in the in the article?
Are they trying to create some kind of a limited hangout?
Are they just trying to give a little St. cred to Louis
Elizondo? I don't know.
I'm. I'm not impressed with that.
Anyway, the article goes on. It says he wrote on November
10th, 2023. A highly reliable source, who I
am not at liberty to to identify, told me that UAP
Unidentified Anonymous phenomena whistleblower David Grush has
privately confirmed that Elizondo also told him about
having screened the Big Serve film and that it did indeed
capture an amazing UFO related dummy warhead interference
event. Well, I don't need it.
I don't need Louis to confirm that.
I really don't. And so we're supposed to just
take him at his word and now we're supposed to believe that
he's confirmed this with David Gresh?
This is this is just more hearsay.
Actually. What I'm interested in is a
testimony from the witnesses that were there on the ground,
looking through the camera lens. It goes on and says.
He added that it seems that the video may have been lost when
the Pentagon destroyed Elizondo's files and emails.
Oh, so now we're to believe that the Pentagon destroyed
Elizondo's files and emails. I just find it hard to believe
that the Pentagon destroyed Elizondo's files and emails.
I just don't believe that. I just don't believe these guys
are in the business of destroying stuff because that's
that's got value, even if it's just a way that they could
control somebody later on, manipulate somebody.
And so why would they throw it away?
It says this would have occurred in 2017 after he resigned as a
tip director, which he claimed was in protest of the bidding on
covering up of UFO matters. I actually think that that's not
correct. I mean, he could say whatever he
wants to do. But as I understand it, a tip
was a temporary program funded through some kind of a line item
deal by Harry Reid, senator from Nevada, at the behest of his
friend Bob Bigelow. Kind of a vanity, A vanity
project is what I would call it. So I don't see this as being
some, like, major department that Louis was running, you
know, I mean, just look at your own state government.
You've got these little temporary programs all over the
place. Sometimes they kind of get
embedded and stick around for a while, but if you've ever had
experience working in in government jobs, even for short
periods of time, you can really find out.
It's like I've said before, in this program, in a normal
situation, 80% of the people are are doing the work at a normal
business and maybe you got 20% of the people are just goofing
off. My experience, from what I can
see from people I've talked to, when it comes to the government
jobs, it's almost the exact opposite.
It's like 20% of the people are doing 80% of the work and then
the other 80% are just goofing around doing a little bit of the
work. This notion that Louie was in
charge of some great productive asset there at the Pentagon, I'm
not buying it. It goes on and says, he
continued. This highly unusual move by the
Pentagon is in direct violation of a legal preservation order
that was mandated based on Elzano's other duties at the
time. Well, this I can see.
Why would they destroy this stuff?
And do we know for sure that it was them that destroyed it and
in finished? It says the order requires all
of Elizondo's electronic and hard copy files to be preserved
indefinitely, including e-mail and correspondence.
Apart from the video, there is some limited evidence supporting
the story. Well, maybe, maybe they were
afraid of what would come out with Louis emails and stuff.
I don't know. There was stuff being done at
Skinwalker Ranch, apparently. Maybe this was a vanity project
that went a little too far. Maybe they didn't think it
would. It would withstand the scrutiny
of the auditors. Hard to believe that.
I mean, considering the Department of Defense cannot
account for $1.55 trillion or half of everything they own.
But it's hard to believe that that Louis Lozano's department
could have been so much worse than that.
But I don't. I don't get it.
Maybe he stumbled across something too.
Maybe I'm being too hard on Louis.
Maybe he's got the big UFO secret out there and he just
can't tell us about it. It says a declassified but
unreleased set of radar data on the September 15th, 1964 event,
but apparently confirmed that an unidentified aerial object was
observed near the dummy warhead during the missile test.
A source told Hastings the analysis of radar suggested that
the unidentified object could have been debris.
It's also possible that it was shaft metallic objects meant to
confuse radar to prevent enemies from pinpointing the exact
location of a warhead. That seems kind of hard to
believe to me because this thing was just taking off the
launchpad. It wasn't like it was even that
far out. Like I said, it was a test,
Hastings wrote. So perhaps mysterious target
tracked on radar near the warhead was merely a shaft.
I really find that to be kind of almost laughable, he added.
On the other hand, it may have indeed been the actual UFO whose
presidency, author of the Radar Data report, would probably not
have known about, given the incident's top secret status.
It comes as a congressman who attended a James Bond style UFO
briefing revealed he believes the US government is covering up
evidence. Representative Tim Burchett
attended the meeting after shocking testimony was given by
whistleblower, former U.S. intelligence officer David
Gresh. Like I said, the story's been
around for a while. It seems believable to me.
The guy seems. The guy seems sincere and
honest. I mean, I don't know.
I wasn't there. But it makes sense that these
things are really interested in our nuclear capability.
And you know, we've had lots of, we've had lots of reports of
these things showing up, showing up at nuclear sites, nuclear
aircraft carriers, whatnot. Now let's look at this last
article here kind of on the same topic.
It says US whistleblowers reveal UFO disabled nuclear missile
using laser beams. Story by Katherine Fiddler.
Now remember we said this is a nuclear missile, the war,
there's no, there's no nuclear material on this thing as far as
bomb is concerned. They were trying to develop this
system where they could deliver multiple weapons I believe at
the same time. Now it says a disc shaped UFO
disabled AUS nuclear missile over the Pacific during a
routine test. According to multiple military
whistleblowers of course that have been there off the coast of
California, the craft allegedly circled the unarmed dummy
warhead as it traveled to several thousand mph before
firing 4 beams of light at the missile.
Now think about this thing, it's going several 1000 miles an hour
and this thing is just zinging around it like it's rubbing a
calf or something. It's just amazing.
It is not known at what altitude the altercation is said to have
occurred. Retired Air Force officers
Lieutenant Bob Jacobs and major Forensic management are among
two who claim the event took place, and they say they have
seen footage of the event which was captured on September 15th,
1964. However, the video has since
gone missing. Well, you're never going to find
a video like that. I mean, they've been trying to
get the stuff on Kennedy for over 60 years.
You're not going to ever get it, it says.
Extraordinary allegations about the encounter have been swirling
for years, but are now being investigated by author Robert
Hastings, who book whose books include UFOs and Nukes.
The secret link Revealed. They've also got a nice little
diagram here showing this missile, you know, launching up
in there and this UFO firing some kind of a laser weapon at
it. Lieutenant Jacobs and major
management were part of the team charged with filming the test
from a military telescopic photography site in Big Sur, CA,
and while doing so, inadvertently capture the
altercation. They alleged that after a highly
restricted screening of the footage, 2 plainclothes CIA
officers compensated the tape. So you've got two guys saying
the same thing. Lieutenant Jacob said that at
the time, Major Manson had told him not to talk about it and
said it had, and said it had never happened.
Well, that would be the first response to something like that.
You know, they could have thought this thing was Russian
or whatever, this this spacecraft.
Separately, Mr. Hastings confirmed that Louis Elizondo,
former director of the Advanced Aerospace Identification
Program, also said he had seen the footage.
See, it just seems to me like Louis has interjected himself
into this whole thing, and I'm a little concerned about that
because this is the first time hearing of Louis seeing this
video. This was confirmed by an
anonymous U.S. Senate investigator, not Mr.
Elizondo himself, who has previously accused the Pentagon
of trying to discredit him for speaking out over the issue of
UFOs. So it sounds like Hastings says
that Luis Ando said he's seen the footage, but then we're
being told this was confirmed by an anonymous U.S.
Senate investigator. So I see you're getting clear
into you're getting clear into hearsay territory there.
Writing on his website The UFO Chronicles, Mr. Hastings
described the craft as a domed, disc shaped object.
The video showed exactly what Doctor Jacobs has maintained
over the years. A UFO actually interfered with
an Atlas missile in flight is it carried a dummy nuclear warhead
aloft, wrote Mr. Hastings. The official Air Force video of
the encounter captures the moment the unknown object
appears to engage the warhead with a luminous beam, which
turned on and off four times as it traveled down range at
several thousand mph over the Pacific Ocean.
That's fascinating. That's got to be a great video.
But if we can't get the cockpit video out of the UFOs that were
shot down over Alaska, the Yukon, Lake Huron, we're
certainly not going to get these.
By 1983, Major Manson had had decided to speak out about the
encounter, describing the UFO as a classic disc.
The center seemed to be a raised bubble.
The entire lower saucer shape was glowing and seemed to be
rotating slowly. So at first he says don't talk
about this, nothing ever happened.
But then 19 years later, I don't know, maybe he's getting a
little bit older and he's like, you know what, I can't be quite
about this any longer. And he comes out with his story,
it says. A year later, Lieutenant Jacobs,
then a university professor specializing in communications,
had written an article about the incident and the
sensationalistic National Enquirer.
They said what you want to about National Enquirer.
Sometimes they get things right. Or these they did.
Back in the day after publication, he began receiving
death threats over the phone and intimidating letters from
certain well known UFO skeptics who attempted to get Jacobs to
retract his story. Now, I really, really wish that
he would name and shame the people that were calling him and
giving him death threats. Because if these are skeptics,
you know, the guys that were making money off this stuff,
debunking this all the time, and then we have a right to know.
Very disappointed that they aren't naming and shaming right
there. Further evidence for the
encounter has been offered in declassified but as yet
unreleased radar data taken on the day which shows an
unidentified object near the missile at the time of the
incident. They're saying that there is
unreleased radar. Radar data that's not
classified. This looks like a classic case
for somebody like Louis or one of these other UFO celebrity
mafia members could come in clandestinely, come into
possession of this stuff, and then release it online.
Booster numbers for a couple of weeks and tell us all how great
they are. That stuff should be released
today. If they know what's there and
it's declassified, why is it not being released?
If they're letting some private journalist come in and release
this, then they are in effect monetizing evidence that belongs
to the public. This is public property, this
radar data, and it should be released on a government website
where we can all see It should not be taken and you know, just
hidden away, sequestered somewhere until they pick out
which UFO celebrity they want to release it to.
We will be keeping an eye on this.
Remember, remember that we talked about this.
So in the next few weeks, if it happens that this radar data is
released from this missile test back in 1964 and that it
suggests that yes, there was a UFO in the area and this comes
out on one of these top producers websites, whether it's
Louis or Corbel or Knapp or whoever, just remember that that
they're, they're telegraphing it to you right here.
We've got the radar information. It's not released, but it's not,
but it is declassified. That's sketchy.
However, Lieutenant Jacobs has suggested this could have been
some of the metallic shafts running the warhead debris
deliberately scattered to confuse enemy radar from
detecting the exact location of a missile.
Yeah, I'm not sure that that metallic shaft fires off laser
beams, so perhaps the mysterious target tracked on the radar near
the warhead was merely the shaft, wrote Hastings.
On the other hand, it may have indeed been the actual UFO whose
presence the author of the radar data reported would probably not
have known about, given the incidents top secret status, so
evidently they didn't know there was a missile one off that day.
On the other hand, it may have indeed been the actual UFO whose
presence the author of the radar data report probably would have
not known about, given the instance TOP secret status.
Well, they've written a report about this.
So that's the first thing they're going to look for come
out is the radar data report. But there again, that's not your
prima facie evidence. This is somebody telling you
what they saw. What we need are actual records
of the radar data that happened that day.
So once again, they're filtering this information.
They are telling you that you can only get it from this
source. They're not being they're
they're not being legit with us. They're keeping this stuff
hidden in a file cabinet somewhere, and then they're
deciding down the road, 5060 years later who gets to who gets
to reveal this information to us.
Now, almost 60 years on and with UFOs making headlines daily, the
story has resurfaced, but the tape has not.
At present, it seems like it was destroyed alongside the rest of
Doctor Mr. Elizondo's files and emails when he resigned as a tip
director in 2017. That's that to me, is really
kind of a reckless assumption right there.
Why would they think that it was destroyed with Elizondo stuff?
This stuff predates Elizondo by, you know, 55 years, so I don't
even see what he's what he's got to do with anything.
This highly unusual move by the Pentagon is in direct violation
of a legal preservation order that was mandated based on
Elizano's other duties at the time.
But Hastings? The order requires all of
Elizano's electronic hard copy files to be preserved
indefinitely, including e-mail and correspondence.
Well, what would it matter? I mean, if you saw the if maybe
Louis saw the video, maybe he didn't, but that doesn't, that
would be no reason for it to be destroyed.
Mr. Elizondo said he stood down in protest at the Pentagon over
excessive secrecy surrounding program.
Speaking to CNN at the time, he said My personal belief is that
there is very compelling evidence that we may not be
alone and blah blah, blah. OK, once again, I'm going to say
this for the umpteenth time. I don't believe that Louis stood
down because he was having a conflict with with people at the
Pentagon and excessive secrecy. I don't believe there was a
cabal that was preventing him from investigating.
We know how a tip was funded. It was funded temporarily by a
line item thing that Harry put in there, as we've said a
million times, reportedly at the at the behest of Bob Bigelow.
Looks to me like a vanity project.
They were doing some research at at Skinwalker Ranch I believe.
Never to me did this ever appear to be a serious project, even
rising to the ranks, a blue book, which a lot of people
thought they were just there to debunk the sightings, not not
investigate them. So I I find this story
interesting, it's been around for a while.
But what concerns me is it seems as if there's been another
little bit of a release on it. These guys have been talking
about this stuff since, like I said, since at least 1982, the
two people in the the two main characters in this, Robert
Jacobson and Hastings. And so I'm not sure what Louis
Elizondo has to do with anything.
I guess the news that they're saying is, hey, someone has come
and told us that Louis said he saw this video, the one you're
talking about. Well, that's hearsay.
And unless and then when someone confronts Louis about it, hey,
where's that video at? Oh, it must have gotten
destroyed along with all of my emails and with all of my data
from my ATEP days. And, you know, that could be,
but I don't see why the DoD would go to the lengths of
destroying this missile. Test video along with Louis
Elizondo's emails doesn't really seem to be much of A connection
there. Certainly he shouldn't have been
emailing people talking to him about it.
You know, it's a it's a great sighting, though.
And it's, I think when you hear about these sightings, the most
important thing to do is always go back to the source.
So what I'm interested in this sighting about is these two
gentlemen that are still alive today, still talking about it,
the sighting that happened in 1964.
I'm not really interested and Luis Elizondo chiming in and
saying, oh by the way, I saw the video or or you, these other
guys. I don't think that a new Forrest
Gump of UFOs has anything to offer to act the validity of
this account. Either you believe them or you
don't believe them. And based on their professional
history and their testimony, I got to believe these guys.
Something very strange happened there that day, and I don't need
Louis Elizondo to confirm that. Until next time.
This is UFO warning over and out.