Hello and welcome to the program UFO.
Warning today's topic Christopher melon outs himself.
That's correct. Christopher melon outs himself.
I found this article on vice.com from their publication
motherboard and the title says X.
Intel official says he was the source of the pentagon's UFO
videos of course, if you've been listening to programming that
Christopher Mellon former DOD employee Former Intelligence
Community employee left working for the government went to work
for Tom DeLonge and to the academy of stars and has been
featured on many of their recent videos on identified in others,
long suspected of being the source for the three F-18
cockpit video, Shows featuring those UFOs.
The original one, of course, back in 2004 off the coast of
California and then the other two coming much later, he has
long been suspected as the individual who handed those
three videos over to the New York Times.
Now, we still don't know if those things were classified or
unclassified at the time that they were leaked to the New York
Times. We don't know who leaked them,
we don't know a lot of things about what happened, but this
article does start to shed some light and there's actually a A
short video clip here. I have it linked at the website
UFO. Warning.com where melon?
Claims admits that he was the fellow that leaked.
Those three videos to the New York Times.
So it's pretty big news. Actually it says Chris Mullin is
a member of Tom belongs to the Stars Academy and claims he got
the videos and depending on parking lot.
Now, this article is by MJ. Baniyas and it came out October
20th 2020. It says in the recently released
UFO documentary. The phenomena Chris melon, the
former deputy assistant of the secretary defense for
intelligence said that. He was The Source Who provided
the New York Times with the three Infamous UFO videos, it
published and 2017. Mellon who is currently a member
of Tom the longs to the Stars, Academy told filmmaker James Fox
and an on camera interview that he met with an unnamed
individual in the parking lot. At the Pentagon and was handed a
package. Containing the three videos that
form the basis of the most important, UFO article and many
years. Now, I have to ask him one
question. When this anonymous source
handed you, those three videos. Mr. Melon did, they already have
the to the academies of star Watermark splattered all over
them? Or did you put that on there
later? Because that that means
something these things were taken from the public domain
basically, which would have been the military?
publicly-owned domain, we should say and then we were transferred
into a privatized Monetize situation.
This is kind of a big deal. He says, I received the videos,
the now-famous videos and a pentagon parking lot from a
defense department official. I still have the packaging melon
said, this is a case where somebody bent the rules a little
bit and they did. So for the larger good and were
absolutely all better off because of it.
Well, isn't that just awesome? Here's a very senior member of
the defense department, a senior member and intelligence
Community who thinks that it's just find somebody bent the
rules. Why don't know?
Manners people in prison all over the place for bending the
rules especially when it comes to classified information and we
still don't know if these things were classified or unclassified.
It seems as though this whole situation is being intentionally
kept opaque Why aren't we being told what the situation with a
status was with these three videos and why is it okay?
For some people to bend the rules, but other people to not
bend the rules. We saw what happened to Roger
Stone last year when he's simply mystery, when a 70 year old man,
simply misremembered, something no mercy for him.
They were going to put him in prison for what amounted to life
in prison. no mercy for lots of people who bend the rules for
what they very well, might think is a good cause this is
something I find very disturbing.
With this attitude that it's okay.
For some people to bend the rules but not others.
And this really has an effect on how I view to the academy of
stars and their role as gatekeeper for this information.
Now, the article continues us as motherboard has been unable to
independently verify that melon was the source of the videos but
his story tracks with everything we know about them.
We know that to the Stars Academy, ultimately published
the videos and melon was one of the earliest members of that
group. Well, think about this, this
took place in a very short timeframe.
So melanin admits that he took these videos from the hand of an
anonymous DOD employee against the rules.
He bent the rules, I'm sorry. But when it comes to
intelligence matters, like this, there's no gray area.
It's black and white, and if it's not white, it's black not
gray. So he took the rules, ETA, he
took these things against the rules and his own admission.
He hands them over to this lady at the New York Times, we're
going to look at it in a second and then she hands him back,
too. His new friends at to the Stars.
This is a very backhanded revolving-door type transaction
in my opinion. I mean, how how else do you
interpret this? We have an individual who went
to work at the dod been there for years and years.
He goes to work for Tom DeLonge. Okay.
And then while he's a private citizen he goes back over to the
dod and literally in the Pentagon parking lot and
receives. Well, it almost looks like
stolen material unauthorized copies, that's for sure if this
person Wasn't worried about being prosecuted for breaking
the rules or having something bad happened to him.
Why does he need to remain anonymous?
If nothing, if nothing happened here, that could cause him
trouble. Why is he Anonymous?
I would be scared to death to do that.
There's no way on Earth. I would, if I would be the guy,
pick it up a brown, paper package from somebody in the dod
parking lot at the Pentagon, I just seems crazy and then he
takes these videos, okay, former DOD guy, With all this Insider
knowledge, picks up these three videos.
He trots them over to the New York Times and they turn around
and hand them over to his friends at to the academy and
Stars. This sounds like the same kind
of like the same kind of circular happy stuff that we had
going on with James Comey. When they were trying to bring
down a President Trump, an illegal coup, I'll take notes of
a meeting. I'll give them to my friend at
this major newspaper and then he'll Publish them and then
we'll use that to investigate people, this kind of circular
nonsense. This is not Kosher.
Okay, just understand this. This is not Kosher so no one
needs to come to me and say how Tom DeLonge is going to be the
savior of the UFO investigative movement and how we're all going
to depend upon him to give us you know disclosure this is not
look good. He says here that One of the New
York Times journalist who worked on that story.
Leslie. Kean also appeared in the
documentary now I put a link to her IMDb or whatever biography
Leslie Kean. You can go to the website UFO
warning.com and click on the link and you'll see this lady
and she's been in a lot of UFO documentaries.
She's the one they bring in usually as a kind of pro UFO
person. Seems like a nice lady but she's
a part of I mean she's a very well-known person in the UFO
investigative world and she's visible.
She has high visibility. Lots and lots of appearances as
an expert witness and these UFO documentaries.
Lots and lots. So this thing just seems more
and more planned out the further you get into it.
So here we have unreleased videos.
Being given by an anonymous source in the parking, lot of
the Pentagon to a former DOD employee.
Who is now a current to the academy stars for profit UFO
company. And in that capacity, he
delivers those videos to this lady at the New York Times who
is well-known in the UFO Community, who has appeared many
many times on television on YouTube and Netflix, whatever.
She's out there, just go to the website UFO, warning Dot Cam
click on the link and you're going to recognize your face.
I guarantee it if you've watched more than five or six UFO
documentaries. So melon gives these gives these
videos to her according to him and then she gives them back.
To TSA tssaa. Why didn't she go ahead and just
release them publicly? Why didn't she just go ahead and
put them on the New York Times website?
Why did she have to give them back to Tom too long?
They say, she released them. Well, she didn't really release
them. She transferred them to a
company that could make money off of them.
It would be like if NASA had kept pictures of the moon,
landing secret, and then clandestinely released a copy to
a former astronaut say who then clandestinely release them to
Yes, news who then put CBS News, Watermark all over the video of
the moon landing and monetized it for a couple years before
NASA came out and said, oh yes, we walked on the moon.
That's sort of shenanigans that are going on here.
In my opinion. It goes on and says, one of New
York Times journalist who worked on that story.
Leslie current also appears in the documentary and that story
The Times unveiled, a secretive Pentagon, you have program
called the advanced Aerospace threat.
Identification program, or aat IP a tip, and released a video
shot by Navy pilots who intercepted a strange object off
the coast of San Diego. this says, Office Christmas ending
November 14th 2000 for the pilots managed to shoot videos
of the object with their f-18s gun camera, to other videos
recorded on January 21st, 2015 were released showing another
anonymous aerial vehicle rotating, while in flight.
And another object quickly, flying over the water below
months. Earlier in late August of 2017,
the former head of a tip Louis Elizondo worked with the defense
office Us of pre-publication and Security review to have the
three videos Declassified. Well, how convenient, how
convenient, if I knew that I was going to go to work for a
profile profit company, make a lot of money producing low
budget, UFO documentaries. It would be so handy to have
these three groundbreaking UFO videos from these F-18 cockpits.
And another thing I'm noticing her while I'm reading this,
nobody wants to talk about the fact that to the academy of
stars was loud, to me, was allowed to apparently a monetize
these things by Plastering their add, their Watermark, their
logo, all over the videos. Why doesn't anybody notice that?
Why doesn't anybody follow the money?
Here on October 4th Karen met with Elizondo as well as other
individuals where she was told about the secret UFO program
Elizondo told motherboard, that Chris melon was in the room as
well and showed Keen videos on a laptop Elizondo believes that
the videos Keen was shown where the three were the three UAP
videos and the question but could not confirm it.
Yeah, I'll be like Elizondo cannot confirm it.
And Bill Clinton. Smoked weed, but didn't inhale.
Are you freaking kidding me? So I'm supposed to believe that
low yellows on. It was sitting there with this
Christopher melon and this lady from New York Times and Mel and
showed her these three UFO videos but he wasn't curious
enough to walk around the table. And look at them.
That just sounds weird. That just sounds really, really
weird. It sounds like I have to ask
myself, was Elizondo the guy in the parking lot.
And was it? Somebody else?
I don't know. It sounds weird to me.
I think it's a fair question, though.
Elizondo blues at the videos. Keane was shown, were the three
UAP videos and question, but would not confirm it out, right?
Because he was not looking at the computer during that time.
You earlier that same day, L zono resigned from his position
at the Pentagon Conflict of interest, maybe, I don't know,
just the thought only days later Elizondo along with melon would
appear on stage with former Blink-182.
Punk rocker, Tom DeLonge and announce a new UFO research
organization named to the Stars Academy of Arts and Science.
You know, the US government is only place you can work and take
all of your trade secrets to your next job and make money off
of them. That's what it seems like. like,
I mean. At the bare face of it, there
should be more questions asked as to why are we holding up
these people? That were former deep Staters
who are obviously profiting off of knowledge that they obtained
while working for us. Why are we supposed to look up
to them? Like they are the end-all
be-all, why are we supposed to set their what Tom DeLonge tells
us? Don't ask him about aliens.
Well, Tom DeLonge says, I saw things that made me so upset
that I couldn't sleep or eat for three days.
Days, but I think something good is going to come out of it.
Why should I be interested in a single thing?
These people have to say it says here as a result UFOs had become
a Hot Topic publicly, the Department of Defense
established a new, UAP task force on August 4th 2020.
To continue investigating UFO reports made by military
personnel. However previous statements by
the Pentagon, contradict this and seemed to indicate that the
Office of Naval intelligence along with the office of the
Secretary of Defense as had such Task force will before August of
2020 motherboard reached out to keen and this is a gown from The
New York Times and she stated that due to policies concerning
sources identity at the New York Times, she cannot comment.
Well, why didn't you ask her? Why she decided to give those
videos to Tom DeLonge and not just release them to the public
at Large? Why didn't you ask her about the
watermark? Why didn't you ask her?
Why Tom DeLonge? And his company were allowed to
monetize those videos. Maybe she's going to have a job
there. Someday, why didn't you ask her?
How much she gets paid to appear?
And those documentaries where she talks about UFOs?
Why don't you ask her? If she feels as though, she
might have a conflict of interest at some level.
I guess we can ask us questions. Melon was also unable to comment
at this time and declined an interview.
No, because they want to control the narrative.
They're not going to let you interview them.
They're going to treat you like little children while they talk
down to you like you're a complete moron.
Okay. Can you see a pattern here?
I've talked about this before directed speech.
They set themselves up as the experts, the teachers.
The knowledge givers you sit down and shut up.
And listen, you're not allowed to ask questions.
Disclosure is not a collaborative effort.
You'll be disclosed when ready to disclose you?
A spokesman for the New York Times told motherboard the
Department of Defense was on the record.
Was the on the record source of the videos in our coverage.
We don't plan to comment beyond that.
Well, there you go inside double-dealing.
The Department of Defense can have a nice little cozy, set
down with the New York Times. But when someone sends a foia or
told to go pound sand, do you see a pattern?
I'll tell you. This is a very disturbing
article to me, I don't see, I don't, I don't get any kind of
Hope or relieved from this. And I want to also point out
that I within the article. There was a link to 16 pages of
email basically, from Elizondo and I won't go through all of
them, all right? But I have a link there, okay?
At the website, UFO morning, doc UFO, warning Dot.
Cam. Now, here's the first one,
Thursday, August 24th, 2017 3:20 p.m. from Michael Russo, to
Louis Elizondo, says Lou, and the heading says class
classification unclassified and then it has the word typed out
for official use only. And then that phrase for
official, use only has been crossed out.
It says, if the service level OCA verifies to me, simple
one-sentence emails fine that removing the maid.
Data from the videos make some unclassified.
Please feel free to move forward with the release now.
Apparently by that, what they're saying by that is you're going
to they're going to take out from that video.
All of the background programming that tells I suppose
you know where the video was filmed at the time, all the
stuff that that's kind of buried in the data.
That makes it a photograph. I'm assuming it says, then it
says, This is from Elizondo back to Russo.
Thank you, sincerely. My friend.
If it is easier for you or more streamlined than please,
consider our request for unrestricted release.
However, my intent is to maintain positive control, but I
know it's a bit unique of a situation.
So whichever is easier for you or quicker, if at all possible.
I would like to have authority to move it down to unclassified
by tomorrow again. Sorry for the Convenience.
I owe you a coffee and a donut. Thanks.
How convenient if I can move it to unclassified.
So as opposed to say, waiting three months, like The Black
Vault would do for a foia request and then the article
just goes on from there. There's more, there's more pages
of it and you can read it. But it shows that Elizondo was
attempting to get the stuff on classified and to get it
released. That's about all I have on this.
Go to the website, you can check it out for yourself, very
interesting stuff. Until next time this is UFO
warning over and out. That's about all I have on this.
Go to the website, you can check it out for yourself, very
interesting stuff. Until next time this is UFO
warning over and out.