1 00:00:03,000 --> 00:00:05,100 Hello and welcome to the program UFO. 2 00:00:05,100 --> 00:00:10,300 Warning today's topic Christopher melon outs himself. 3 00:00:10,800 --> 00:00:15,100 That's correct. Christopher melon outs himself. 4 00:00:15,800 --> 00:00:20,500 I found this article on vice.com from their publication 5 00:00:20,500 --> 00:00:23,300 motherboard and the title says X. 6 00:00:23,300 --> 00:00:28,600 Intel official says he was the source of the pentagon's UFO 7 00:00:28,600 --> 00:00:31,200 videos of course, if you've been listening to programming that 8 00:00:31,200 --> 00:00:37,300 Christopher Mellon former DOD employee Former Intelligence 9 00:00:37,300 --> 00:00:43,700 Community employee left working for the government went to work 10 00:00:43,700 --> 00:00:47,800 for Tom DeLonge and to the academy of stars and has been 11 00:00:47,800 --> 00:00:54,100 featured on many of their recent videos on identified in others, 12 00:00:54,600 --> 00:00:59,100 long suspected of being the source for the three F-18 13 00:00:59,100 --> 00:01:01,700 cockpit video, Shows featuring those UFOs. 14 00:01:02,800 --> 00:01:05,900 The original one, of course, back in 2004 off the coast of 15 00:01:05,900 --> 00:01:09,200 California and then the other two coming much later, he has 16 00:01:09,200 --> 00:01:12,700 long been suspected as the individual who handed those 17 00:01:12,700 --> 00:01:15,300 three videos over to the New York Times. 18 00:01:15,500 --> 00:01:17,900 Now, we still don't know if those things were classified or 19 00:01:17,900 --> 00:01:21,300 unclassified at the time that they were leaked to the New York 20 00:01:21,300 --> 00:01:24,200 Times. We don't know who leaked them, 21 00:01:25,200 --> 00:01:28,000 we don't know a lot of things about what happened, but this 22 00:01:28,000 --> 00:01:32,300 article does start to shed some light and there's actually a A 23 00:01:32,300 --> 00:01:35,700 short video clip here. I have it linked at the website 24 00:01:35,700 --> 00:01:38,200 UFO. Warning.com where melon? 25 00:01:39,900 --> 00:01:43,800 Claims admits that he was the fellow that leaked. 26 00:01:43,800 --> 00:01:47,500 Those three videos to the New York Times. 27 00:01:48,300 --> 00:01:51,900 So it's pretty big news. Actually it says Chris Mullin is 28 00:01:51,900 --> 00:01:56,400 a member of Tom belongs to the Stars Academy and claims he got 29 00:01:56,400 --> 00:01:59,200 the videos and depending on parking lot. 30 00:02:00,100 --> 00:02:06,100 Now, this article is by MJ. Baniyas and it came out October 31 00:02:06,100 --> 00:02:10,500 20th 2020. It says in the recently released 32 00:02:10,600 --> 00:02:14,400 UFO documentary. The phenomena Chris melon, the 33 00:02:14,400 --> 00:02:17,000 former deputy assistant of the secretary defense for 34 00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:21,700 intelligence said that. He was The Source Who provided 35 00:02:21,800 --> 00:02:26,900 the New York Times with the three Infamous UFO videos, it 36 00:02:26,900 --> 00:02:33,800 published and 2017. Mellon who is currently a member 37 00:02:33,800 --> 00:02:40,000 of Tom the longs to the Stars, Academy told filmmaker James Fox 38 00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:44,700 and an on camera interview that he met with an unnamed 39 00:02:44,700 --> 00:02:49,300 individual in the parking lot. At the Pentagon and was handed a 40 00:02:49,300 --> 00:02:51,900 package. Containing the three videos that 41 00:02:51,900 --> 00:02:56,100 form the basis of the most important, UFO article and many 42 00:02:56,100 --> 00:02:59,000 years. Now, I have to ask him one 43 00:02:59,000 --> 00:03:03,600 question. When this anonymous source 44 00:03:04,000 --> 00:03:09,700 handed you, those three videos. Mr. Melon did, they already have 45 00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:12,900 the to the academies of star Watermark splattered all over 46 00:03:12,900 --> 00:03:14,900 them? Or did you put that on there 47 00:03:14,900 --> 00:03:17,500 later? Because that that means 48 00:03:17,500 --> 00:03:24,000 something these things were taken from the public domain 49 00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:26,100 basically, which would have been the military? 50 00:03:28,300 --> 00:03:32,300 publicly-owned domain, we should say and then we were transferred 51 00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:38,000 into a privatized Monetize situation. 52 00:03:38,700 --> 00:03:43,900 This is kind of a big deal. He says, I received the videos, 53 00:03:44,100 --> 00:03:47,500 the now-famous videos and a pentagon parking lot from a 54 00:03:47,508 --> 00:03:51,700 defense department official. I still have the packaging melon 55 00:03:51,700 --> 00:03:56,500 said, this is a case where somebody bent the rules a little 56 00:03:56,500 --> 00:04:00,800 bit and they did. So for the larger good and were 57 00:04:00,800 --> 00:04:04,900 absolutely all better off because of it. 58 00:04:05,900 --> 00:04:11,400 Well, isn't that just awesome? Here's a very senior member of 59 00:04:11,600 --> 00:04:14,300 the defense department, a senior member and intelligence 60 00:04:14,300 --> 00:04:17,399 Community who thinks that it's just find somebody bent the 61 00:04:17,399 --> 00:04:19,300 rules. Why don't know? 62 00:04:19,300 --> 00:04:22,000 Manners people in prison all over the place for bending the 63 00:04:22,000 --> 00:04:26,000 rules especially when it comes to classified information and we 64 00:04:26,000 --> 00:04:28,700 still don't know if these things were classified or unclassified. 65 00:04:29,300 --> 00:04:34,700 It seems as though this whole situation is being intentionally 66 00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:40,200 kept opaque Why aren't we being told what the situation with a 67 00:04:40,208 --> 00:04:42,700 status was with these three videos and why is it okay? 68 00:04:42,700 --> 00:04:47,000 For some people to bend the rules, but other people to not 69 00:04:47,000 --> 00:04:50,000 bend the rules. We saw what happened to Roger 70 00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:52,900 Stone last year when he's simply mystery, when a 70 year old man, 71 00:04:52,900 --> 00:04:56,500 simply misremembered, something no mercy for him. 72 00:04:56,500 --> 00:04:58,700 They were going to put him in prison for what amounted to life 73 00:04:58,700 --> 00:05:04,600 in prison. no mercy for lots of people who bend the rules for 74 00:05:04,600 --> 00:05:09,700 what they very well, might think is a good cause this is 75 00:05:09,700 --> 00:05:11,600 something I find very disturbing. 76 00:05:12,700 --> 00:05:14,300 With this attitude that it's okay. 77 00:05:14,300 --> 00:05:17,700 For some people to bend the rules but not others. 78 00:05:18,800 --> 00:05:23,700 And this really has an effect on how I view to the academy of 79 00:05:23,700 --> 00:05:28,700 stars and their role as gatekeeper for this information. 80 00:05:28,900 --> 00:05:32,900 Now, the article continues us as motherboard has been unable to 81 00:05:32,900 --> 00:05:38,000 independently verify that melon was the source of the videos but 82 00:05:38,000 --> 00:05:42,000 his story tracks with everything we know about them. 83 00:05:42,500 --> 00:05:46,400 We know that to the Stars Academy, ultimately published 84 00:05:46,400 --> 00:05:50,600 the videos and melon was one of the earliest members of that 85 00:05:50,600 --> 00:05:53,200 group. Well, think about this, this 86 00:05:53,500 --> 00:05:55,600 took place in a very short timeframe. 87 00:05:56,000 --> 00:06:01,900 So melanin admits that he took these videos from the hand of an 88 00:06:01,900 --> 00:06:05,600 anonymous DOD employee against the rules. 89 00:06:06,200 --> 00:06:08,200 He bent the rules, I'm sorry. But when it comes to 90 00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:11,500 intelligence matters, like this, there's no gray area. 91 00:06:11,700 --> 00:06:16,300 It's black and white, and if it's not white, it's black not 92 00:06:16,300 --> 00:06:19,100 gray. So he took the rules, ETA, he 93 00:06:19,100 --> 00:06:21,800 took these things against the rules and his own admission. 94 00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:26,800 He hands them over to this lady at the New York Times, we're 95 00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:30,300 going to look at it in a second and then she hands him back, 96 00:06:30,300 --> 00:06:33,700 too. His new friends at to the Stars. 97 00:06:33,800 --> 00:06:38,600 This is a very backhanded revolving-door type transaction 98 00:06:38,600 --> 00:06:42,700 in my opinion. I mean, how how else do you 99 00:06:43,300 --> 00:06:46,500 interpret this? We have an individual who went 100 00:06:46,500 --> 00:06:50,500 to work at the dod been there for years and years. 101 00:06:50,700 --> 00:06:53,000 He goes to work for Tom DeLonge. Okay. 102 00:06:53,400 --> 00:06:57,800 And then while he's a private citizen he goes back over to the 103 00:06:57,800 --> 00:07:02,100 dod and literally in the Pentagon parking lot and 104 00:07:02,100 --> 00:07:04,900 receives. Well, it almost looks like 105 00:07:04,900 --> 00:07:09,200 stolen material unauthorized copies, that's for sure if this 106 00:07:09,200 --> 00:07:12,600 person Wasn't worried about being prosecuted for breaking 107 00:07:12,600 --> 00:07:16,600 the rules or having something bad happened to him. 108 00:07:17,000 --> 00:07:18,900 Why does he need to remain anonymous? 109 00:07:19,600 --> 00:07:22,900 If nothing, if nothing happened here, that could cause him 110 00:07:22,900 --> 00:07:24,600 trouble. Why is he Anonymous? 111 00:07:25,300 --> 00:07:26,900 I would be scared to death to do that. 112 00:07:26,900 --> 00:07:29,300 There's no way on Earth. I would, if I would be the guy, 113 00:07:29,600 --> 00:07:32,700 pick it up a brown, paper package from somebody in the dod 114 00:07:32,700 --> 00:07:36,600 parking lot at the Pentagon, I just seems crazy and then he 115 00:07:36,608 --> 00:07:41,200 takes these videos, okay, former DOD guy, With all this Insider 116 00:07:41,200 --> 00:07:43,000 knowledge, picks up these three videos. 117 00:07:43,500 --> 00:07:46,800 He trots them over to the New York Times and they turn around 118 00:07:46,800 --> 00:07:50,600 and hand them over to his friends at to the academy and 119 00:07:50,600 --> 00:07:52,300 Stars. This sounds like the same kind 120 00:07:52,300 --> 00:07:56,900 of like the same kind of circular happy stuff that we had 121 00:07:56,900 --> 00:08:00,600 going on with James Comey. When they were trying to bring 122 00:08:00,600 --> 00:08:05,600 down a President Trump, an illegal coup, I'll take notes of 123 00:08:05,600 --> 00:08:07,800 a meeting. I'll give them to my friend at 124 00:08:07,808 --> 00:08:11,300 this major newspaper and then he'll Publish them and then 125 00:08:11,300 --> 00:08:15,200 we'll use that to investigate people, this kind of circular 126 00:08:15,200 --> 00:08:18,600 nonsense. This is not Kosher. 127 00:08:18,700 --> 00:08:23,600 Okay, just understand this. This is not Kosher so no one 128 00:08:23,600 --> 00:08:25,700 needs to come to me and say how Tom DeLonge is going to be the 129 00:08:25,700 --> 00:08:29,000 savior of the UFO investigative movement and how we're all going 130 00:08:29,000 --> 00:08:34,299 to depend upon him to give us you know disclosure this is not 131 00:08:34,299 --> 00:08:39,100 look good. He says here that One of the New 132 00:08:39,100 --> 00:08:41,799 York Times journalist who worked on that story. 133 00:08:41,799 --> 00:08:44,000 Leslie. Kean also appeared in the 134 00:08:44,000 --> 00:08:50,300 documentary now I put a link to her IMDb or whatever biography 135 00:08:50,300 --> 00:08:53,700 Leslie Kean. You can go to the website UFO 136 00:08:53,700 --> 00:08:57,200 warning.com and click on the link and you'll see this lady 137 00:08:57,600 --> 00:09:00,000 and she's been in a lot of UFO documentaries. 138 00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:03,900 She's the one they bring in usually as a kind of pro UFO 139 00:09:03,900 --> 00:09:06,400 person. Seems like a nice lady but she's 140 00:09:06,400 --> 00:09:10,300 a part of I mean she's a very well-known person in the UFO 141 00:09:10,300 --> 00:09:13,400 investigative world and she's visible. 142 00:09:13,400 --> 00:09:18,700 She has high visibility. Lots and lots of appearances as 143 00:09:18,700 --> 00:09:22,000 an expert witness and these UFO documentaries. 144 00:09:23,700 --> 00:09:26,200 Lots and lots. So this thing just seems more 145 00:09:26,200 --> 00:09:29,000 and more planned out the further you get into it. 146 00:09:30,700 --> 00:09:34,100 So here we have unreleased videos. 147 00:09:35,700 --> 00:09:39,200 Being given by an anonymous source in the parking, lot of 148 00:09:39,200 --> 00:09:42,700 the Pentagon to a former DOD employee. 149 00:09:43,200 --> 00:09:46,700 Who is now a current to the academy stars for profit UFO 150 00:09:46,700 --> 00:09:50,400 company. And in that capacity, he 151 00:09:50,400 --> 00:09:54,000 delivers those videos to this lady at the New York Times who 152 00:09:54,000 --> 00:09:57,900 is well-known in the UFO Community, who has appeared many 153 00:09:57,900 --> 00:10:01,900 many times on television on YouTube and Netflix, whatever. 154 00:10:02,100 --> 00:10:05,800 She's out there, just go to the website UFO, warning Dot Cam 155 00:10:05,800 --> 00:10:08,000 click on the link and you're going to recognize your face. 156 00:10:08,000 --> 00:10:11,000 I guarantee it if you've watched more than five or six UFO 157 00:10:11,000 --> 00:10:16,800 documentaries. So melon gives these gives these 158 00:10:16,800 --> 00:10:21,300 videos to her according to him and then she gives them back. 159 00:10:23,100 --> 00:10:27,700 To TSA tssaa. Why didn't she go ahead and just 160 00:10:27,700 --> 00:10:30,900 release them publicly? Why didn't she just go ahead and 161 00:10:30,900 --> 00:10:32,800 put them on the New York Times website? 162 00:10:34,100 --> 00:10:36,800 Why did she have to give them back to Tom too long? 163 00:10:36,800 --> 00:10:39,100 They say, she released them. Well, she didn't really release 164 00:10:39,100 --> 00:10:43,400 them. She transferred them to a 165 00:10:43,400 --> 00:10:47,000 company that could make money off of them. 166 00:10:47,400 --> 00:10:51,700 It would be like if NASA had kept pictures of the moon, 167 00:10:51,700 --> 00:10:57,400 landing secret, and then clandestinely released a copy to 168 00:10:57,400 --> 00:11:02,900 a former astronaut say who then clandestinely release them to 169 00:11:03,500 --> 00:11:10,100 Yes, news who then put CBS News, Watermark all over the video of 170 00:11:10,100 --> 00:11:14,000 the moon landing and monetized it for a couple years before 171 00:11:14,000 --> 00:11:16,700 NASA came out and said, oh yes, we walked on the moon. 172 00:11:17,100 --> 00:11:19,400 That's sort of shenanigans that are going on here. 173 00:11:21,000 --> 00:11:26,000 In my opinion. It goes on and says, one of New 174 00:11:26,000 --> 00:11:28,000 York Times journalist who worked on that story. 175 00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:31,200 Leslie current also appears in the documentary and that story 176 00:11:31,200 --> 00:11:34,100 The Times unveiled, a secretive Pentagon, you have program 177 00:11:34,100 --> 00:11:36,400 called the advanced Aerospace threat. 178 00:11:36,400 --> 00:11:40,700 Identification program, or aat IP a tip, and released a video 179 00:11:40,700 --> 00:11:44,800 shot by Navy pilots who intercepted a strange object off 180 00:11:44,800 --> 00:11:56,000 the coast of San Diego. this says, Office Christmas ending 181 00:11:56,000 --> 00:11:59,800 November 14th 2000 for the pilots managed to shoot videos 182 00:11:59,800 --> 00:12:03,400 of the object with their f-18s gun camera, to other videos 183 00:12:03,400 --> 00:12:07,500 recorded on January 21st, 2015 were released showing another 184 00:12:07,500 --> 00:12:12,700 anonymous aerial vehicle rotating, while in flight. 185 00:12:12,700 --> 00:12:16,300 And another object quickly, flying over the water below 186 00:12:16,900 --> 00:12:19,900 months. Earlier in late August of 2017, 187 00:12:20,200 --> 00:12:24,200 the former head of a tip Louis Elizondo worked with the defense 188 00:12:24,200 --> 00:12:28,800 office Us of pre-publication and Security review to have the 189 00:12:28,800 --> 00:12:34,200 three videos Declassified. Well, how convenient, how 190 00:12:34,200 --> 00:12:36,800 convenient, if I knew that I was going to go to work for a 191 00:12:36,800 --> 00:12:42,400 profile profit company, make a lot of money producing low 192 00:12:42,400 --> 00:12:47,000 budget, UFO documentaries. It would be so handy to have 193 00:12:47,000 --> 00:12:53,800 these three groundbreaking UFO videos from these F-18 cockpits. 194 00:12:54,800 --> 00:12:56,600 And another thing I'm noticing her while I'm reading this, 195 00:12:56,600 --> 00:12:59,800 nobody wants to talk about the fact that to the academy of 196 00:12:59,800 --> 00:13:03,700 stars was loud, to me, was allowed to apparently a monetize 197 00:13:03,700 --> 00:13:07,300 these things by Plastering their add, their Watermark, their 198 00:13:07,300 --> 00:13:12,600 logo, all over the videos. Why doesn't anybody notice that? 199 00:13:12,600 --> 00:13:14,100 Why doesn't anybody follow the money? 200 00:13:14,300 --> 00:13:19,900 Here on October 4th Karen met with Elizondo as well as other 201 00:13:19,900 --> 00:13:23,500 individuals where she was told about the secret UFO program 202 00:13:23,800 --> 00:13:27,700 Elizondo told motherboard, that Chris melon was in the room as 203 00:13:27,700 --> 00:13:33,100 well and showed Keen videos on a laptop Elizondo believes that 204 00:13:33,100 --> 00:13:37,200 the videos Keen was shown where the three were the three UAP 205 00:13:37,200 --> 00:13:40,200 videos and the question but could not confirm it. 206 00:13:40,900 --> 00:13:45,300 Yeah, I'll be like Elizondo cannot confirm it. 207 00:13:47,100 --> 00:13:51,800 And Bill Clinton. Smoked weed, but didn't inhale. 208 00:13:52,500 --> 00:13:55,800 Are you freaking kidding me? So I'm supposed to believe that 209 00:13:55,800 --> 00:13:58,100 low yellows on. It was sitting there with this 210 00:13:58,100 --> 00:14:01,000 Christopher melon and this lady from New York Times and Mel and 211 00:14:01,000 --> 00:14:06,800 showed her these three UFO videos but he wasn't curious 212 00:14:06,800 --> 00:14:09,700 enough to walk around the table. And look at them. 213 00:14:10,200 --> 00:14:14,100 That just sounds weird. That just sounds really, really 214 00:14:14,100 --> 00:14:15,700 weird. It sounds like I have to ask 215 00:14:15,700 --> 00:14:18,900 myself, was Elizondo the guy in the parking lot. 216 00:14:19,300 --> 00:14:20,500 And was it? Somebody else? 217 00:14:20,500 --> 00:14:22,400 I don't know. It sounds weird to me. 218 00:14:23,300 --> 00:14:24,800 I think it's a fair question, though. 219 00:14:25,500 --> 00:14:29,200 Elizondo blues at the videos. Keane was shown, were the three 220 00:14:29,200 --> 00:14:32,500 UAP videos and question, but would not confirm it out, right? 221 00:14:32,500 --> 00:14:35,500 Because he was not looking at the computer during that time. 222 00:14:35,900 --> 00:14:41,600 You earlier that same day, L zono resigned from his position 223 00:14:41,600 --> 00:14:45,900 at the Pentagon Conflict of interest, maybe, I don't know, 224 00:14:46,600 --> 00:14:52,100 just the thought only days later Elizondo along with melon would 225 00:14:52,100 --> 00:14:55,300 appear on stage with former Blink-182. 226 00:14:55,400 --> 00:15:00,200 Punk rocker, Tom DeLonge and announce a new UFO research 227 00:15:00,200 --> 00:15:04,400 organization named to the Stars Academy of Arts and Science. 228 00:15:05,000 --> 00:15:09,200 You know, the US government is only place you can work and take 229 00:15:09,200 --> 00:15:12,300 all of your trade secrets to your next job and make money off 230 00:15:12,300 --> 00:15:13,800 of them. That's what it seems like. like, 231 00:15:15,000 --> 00:15:21,200 I mean. At the bare face of it, there 232 00:15:21,200 --> 00:15:25,400 should be more questions asked as to why are we holding up 233 00:15:25,400 --> 00:15:28,300 these people? That were former deep Staters 234 00:15:28,600 --> 00:15:32,900 who are obviously profiting off of knowledge that they obtained 235 00:15:32,900 --> 00:15:36,600 while working for us. Why are we supposed to look up 236 00:15:36,600 --> 00:15:38,000 to them? Like they are the end-all 237 00:15:38,000 --> 00:15:41,000 be-all, why are we supposed to set their what Tom DeLonge tells 238 00:15:41,000 --> 00:15:43,000 us? Don't ask him about aliens. 239 00:15:43,200 --> 00:15:46,700 Well, Tom DeLonge says, I saw things that made me so upset 240 00:15:46,700 --> 00:15:48,200 that I couldn't sleep or eat for three days. 241 00:15:48,400 --> 00:15:51,100 Days, but I think something good is going to come out of it. 242 00:15:53,600 --> 00:15:56,000 Why should I be interested in a single thing? 243 00:15:56,000 --> 00:16:00,900 These people have to say it says here as a result UFOs had become 244 00:16:00,900 --> 00:16:03,600 a Hot Topic publicly, the Department of Defense 245 00:16:03,600 --> 00:16:08,400 established a new, UAP task force on August 4th 2020. 246 00:16:08,500 --> 00:16:11,900 To continue investigating UFO reports made by military 247 00:16:11,900 --> 00:16:14,400 personnel. However previous statements by 248 00:16:14,400 --> 00:16:17,500 the Pentagon, contradict this and seemed to indicate that the 249 00:16:17,500 --> 00:16:20,100 Office of Naval intelligence along with the office of the 250 00:16:20,100 --> 00:16:25,200 Secretary of Defense as had such Task force will before August of 251 00:16:25,200 --> 00:16:29,500 2020 motherboard reached out to keen and this is a gown from The 252 00:16:29,500 --> 00:16:33,800 New York Times and she stated that due to policies concerning 253 00:16:33,800 --> 00:16:38,100 sources identity at the New York Times, she cannot comment. 254 00:16:38,900 --> 00:16:42,400 Well, why didn't you ask her? Why she decided to give those 255 00:16:42,400 --> 00:16:45,400 videos to Tom DeLonge and not just release them to the public 256 00:16:45,400 --> 00:16:48,700 at Large? Why didn't you ask her about the 257 00:16:48,700 --> 00:16:50,600 watermark? Why didn't you ask her? 258 00:16:50,800 --> 00:16:54,700 Why Tom DeLonge? And his company were allowed to 259 00:16:54,700 --> 00:17:00,000 monetize those videos. Maybe she's going to have a job 260 00:17:00,000 --> 00:17:02,300 there. Someday, why didn't you ask her? 261 00:17:02,300 --> 00:17:05,000 How much she gets paid to appear? 262 00:17:05,200 --> 00:17:07,900 And those documentaries where she talks about UFOs? 263 00:17:08,800 --> 00:17:10,700 Why don't you ask her? If she feels as though, she 264 00:17:10,700 --> 00:17:13,200 might have a conflict of interest at some level. 265 00:17:15,500 --> 00:17:20,200 I guess we can ask us questions. Melon was also unable to comment 266 00:17:20,200 --> 00:17:22,500 at this time and declined an interview. 267 00:17:22,700 --> 00:17:25,000 No, because they want to control the narrative. 268 00:17:25,400 --> 00:17:27,500 They're not going to let you interview them. 269 00:17:27,500 --> 00:17:30,400 They're going to treat you like little children while they talk 270 00:17:30,400 --> 00:17:32,800 down to you like you're a complete moron. 271 00:17:33,300 --> 00:17:35,900 Okay. Can you see a pattern here? 272 00:17:36,200 --> 00:17:39,000 I've talked about this before directed speech. 273 00:17:39,300 --> 00:17:42,400 They set themselves up as the experts, the teachers. 274 00:17:43,500 --> 00:17:45,800 The knowledge givers you sit down and shut up. 275 00:17:45,800 --> 00:17:48,300 And listen, you're not allowed to ask questions. 276 00:17:49,100 --> 00:17:51,200 Disclosure is not a collaborative effort. 277 00:17:52,700 --> 00:17:54,800 You'll be disclosed when ready to disclose you? 278 00:17:56,200 --> 00:17:59,700 A spokesman for the New York Times told motherboard the 279 00:17:59,700 --> 00:18:02,900 Department of Defense was on the record. 280 00:18:03,800 --> 00:18:08,000 Was the on the record source of the videos in our coverage. 281 00:18:08,100 --> 00:18:10,400 We don't plan to comment beyond that. 282 00:18:10,700 --> 00:18:14,200 Well, there you go inside double-dealing. 283 00:18:16,300 --> 00:18:18,600 The Department of Defense can have a nice little cozy, set 284 00:18:18,600 --> 00:18:23,600 down with the New York Times. But when someone sends a foia or 285 00:18:23,600 --> 00:18:26,700 told to go pound sand, do you see a pattern? 286 00:18:28,700 --> 00:18:31,000 I'll tell you. This is a very disturbing 287 00:18:31,000 --> 00:18:34,500 article to me, I don't see, I don't, I don't get any kind of 288 00:18:37,100 --> 00:18:40,900 Hope or relieved from this. And I want to also point out 289 00:18:41,000 --> 00:18:47,600 that I within the article. There was a link to 16 pages of 290 00:18:47,600 --> 00:18:51,600 email basically, from Elizondo and I won't go through all of 291 00:18:51,600 --> 00:18:54,300 them, all right? But I have a link there, okay? 292 00:18:54,500 --> 00:18:57,300 At the website, UFO morning, doc UFO, warning Dot. 293 00:18:57,500 --> 00:18:59,500 Cam. Now, here's the first one, 294 00:18:59,700 --> 00:19:05,900 Thursday, August 24th, 2017 3:20 p.m. from Michael Russo, to 295 00:19:05,900 --> 00:19:09,900 Louis Elizondo, says Lou, and the heading says class 296 00:19:10,000 --> 00:19:13,900 classification unclassified and then it has the word typed out 297 00:19:13,900 --> 00:19:17,100 for official use only. And then that phrase for 298 00:19:17,100 --> 00:19:19,700 official, use only has been crossed out. 299 00:19:20,000 --> 00:19:24,500 It says, if the service level OCA verifies to me, simple 300 00:19:24,500 --> 00:19:27,300 one-sentence emails fine that removing the maid. 301 00:19:27,500 --> 00:19:31,000 Data from the videos make some unclassified. 302 00:19:31,300 --> 00:19:34,800 Please feel free to move forward with the release now. 303 00:19:34,800 --> 00:19:37,300 Apparently by that, what they're saying by that is you're going 304 00:19:37,300 --> 00:19:40,600 to they're going to take out from that video. 305 00:19:40,600 --> 00:19:43,800 All of the background programming that tells I suppose 306 00:19:44,100 --> 00:19:47,400 you know where the video was filmed at the time, all the 307 00:19:47,400 --> 00:19:51,100 stuff that that's kind of buried in the data. 308 00:19:51,100 --> 00:19:55,900 That makes it a photograph. I'm assuming it says, then it 309 00:19:55,900 --> 00:20:01,200 says, This is from Elizondo back to Russo. 310 00:20:01,500 --> 00:20:03,400 Thank you, sincerely. My friend. 311 00:20:03,800 --> 00:20:07,300 If it is easier for you or more streamlined than please, 312 00:20:07,300 --> 00:20:11,000 consider our request for unrestricted release. 313 00:20:11,400 --> 00:20:14,800 However, my intent is to maintain positive control, but I 314 00:20:14,800 --> 00:20:16,400 know it's a bit unique of a situation. 315 00:20:16,400 --> 00:20:20,700 So whichever is easier for you or quicker, if at all possible. 316 00:20:20,700 --> 00:20:25,200 I would like to have authority to move it down to unclassified 317 00:20:25,300 --> 00:20:28,300 by tomorrow again. Sorry for the Convenience. 318 00:20:28,400 --> 00:20:30,800 I owe you a coffee and a donut. Thanks. 319 00:20:32,700 --> 00:20:35,700 How convenient if I can move it to unclassified. 320 00:20:36,200 --> 00:20:39,500 So as opposed to say, waiting three months, like The Black 321 00:20:39,500 --> 00:20:42,700 Vault would do for a foia request and then the article 322 00:20:42,700 --> 00:20:45,200 just goes on from there. There's more, there's more pages 323 00:20:45,200 --> 00:20:50,000 of it and you can read it. But it shows that Elizondo was 324 00:20:50,100 --> 00:20:53,100 attempting to get the stuff on classified and to get it 325 00:20:53,100 --> 00:20:57,300 released. That's about all I have on this. 326 00:20:57,300 --> 00:21:00,200 Go to the website, you can check it out for yourself, very 327 00:21:00,200 --> 00:21:02,600 interesting stuff. Until next time this is UFO 328 00:21:02,600 --> 00:20:57,300 warning over and out. That's about all I have on this. 329 00:20:57,300 --> 00:21:00,200 Go to the website, you can check it out for yourself, very 330 00:21:00,200 --> 00:21:02,600 interesting stuff. Until next time this is UFO 331 00:21:02,600 --> 00:21:04,100 warning over and out.