Hello, and welcome to the program You'll for warning.
In this episode, we're talking about UFO destroyers.
That's correct, UFO destroyers. Now, the word is out that the
Navy, in particular, maybe the entire Defense Department of the
United States, has something that's being called a UFO
Destroyer Missile. Apparently this thing's been
specially designed just to take down UF O's, and this could
explain some things. For instance, there's been some
talk lately about the fact that that that UFO that was shot down
over Alaska back in February and the one in over Lake Huron and
in the UConn, we're not seeing any of the video for that and
we're going to get into that in a minute.
There's been more questions right arise about just what
happened up there, specifically in northern Alaska along the
Arctic Sea, out over the Arctic sea.
Actually, was that a UFO that was shot down?
And where's the cockpit video of whatever it was that shot that
was shot down. Now before I get into this first
article, I just want to say thank you to everybody that
supports a program, especially there on the Buy Me a Coffee
website and also on the Spotify site.
We really appreciate that. If you're listening to the
program, go ahead and take the time to follow, like subscribe
whatever. And if you want to go to
twitter@warningsubufo.com and follow over there.
And just quickly I would mention out of all the dozens and dozens
of comments I get, you know, most of them are all really
positive and very supportive and I appreciate that.
But there's been a couple people say that when they listen to the
podcast, it sounds like they're hearing popping sounds or
crackling sounds. Most people say it sounds pretty
good. So if you're having problems
with the audio, you might try. Let me know if you're let me
know if you're having problems on Spotify or some other
platform. I'd really like to know which
platform, if it's the same platform, because the fact is
I've got a tool mic that I use which is not the high high end
mic, but it's a $250 mic and most people say it sounds pretty
decent. I also do the editing on these
through Spotify. They've got a pretty decent
program to edit your podcast on and I try to always cut out any
of the popping sounds or you know, once in a while if if you
get a little too close to the mic, it'll make a crackle or
pop. I try to get rid of those, but
if that's an ongoing constant thing, let me know and let me
know what platform you seem to be having the most issues with.
And we'll try to see if this is just an isolated case or if this
is something that most people are having because we want the
sound quality to be good. Now this first article here
comes to us from Hows and whys and the title says Journalist
said 2023 Alaska Object was anomalous.
It looked like a giant Tic Tac. Now this article was written by
Vicki Verma posted it looks like 8/23/27.
So they've got the date here, European style.
So August 27th 2023, three O 7:00 AM their time.
The series of events involving the US military shooting down
multiple unidentified aerial phenomena in February 2023 has
been staggering, particularly concerning the incident with an
object detected over Alaska. When this object was intercepted
above Alaska, the administration of the US president promptly
ordered his takedown without hesitation.
Yeah, you know, I'm not sure about all that.
And I'm not sure where they're getting the information from,
because I, as I understand this thing was tracked for a while
before anything was done, which you would want them not to just
take down a UFO without hesitation.
I mean, what if the same would happen to have a hydrogen bomb
on board? I mean, that doesn't seem like a
very intelligent thing to do, to just shoot this thing down
without trying to ascertain what it is first.
So on February 10th, it says 2023.
A US F22 fighter jet successfully brought down the
object, which was flying at an altitude of approximately 40,000
feet over Alaska. We don't know who owns this
object, said the White House spokesperson John Kirby, adding
that it was unclear where its flight originated.
The objects fell inside the United States territorial
waters. Mr. Kirby explained that those
waters were frozen but still within American territory,
implying that the recovery of the debris would be much easier.
Now, just to give you an idea where this thing's at here in
the very northern edge of Alaska, I've posted or I've this
and I've posted a link rather to the video.
There was a fellow up there that posted he was making posts on
this recovery effort from what he could see as an oil worker up
there in Alaska. And he's got lots of video and
pictures of military aircraft flying overhead, this oil
drilling area where he's at toward what we can assume was
the shoot down area of this UFO, Blackhawk helicopters, these
great big, he said they're not actually cargo planes, but it
looked like cargo planes. So something was definitely
going on there out on the ice, and apparently it was about 5 or
6 miles out to sea. Now it says US Brigadier General
Patrick Ryder, the Pentagon's chief spokesperson, indicated
that it was the size of a small car.
According to him, the pilots who had been observing the object
before it was shot down confirmed that there was no
human presence on board. Now, how in the world would they
know that if this thing is unless there's windows in this
thing where they can see inside of it, and even then how would
they know? So that to me that's that's
really suspect claim to make it goes on it says.
He further remarked that it lacked the ability to change
direction and did not resemble any conventional aircraft.
It wasn't an aircraft per se writer inform the media.
That's pretty much the exact opposite of what we've been told
previously. So you can see here in my
opinion they're developing this parallel narrative pretty
quickly after they've shot this thing down or whatever happened
with this thing. Interestingly, the pilots
involved in the sighting gave inconsistent reports.
Some stated that the object interfered with their planes
sensors, while others did not experience this.
Some also claimed they could not discern any recognizable source
of propulsion on the object and were unable to explain how it
was able to remain afloat while cruising at an altitude of
40,000 feet. Well, and you know, it doesn't
give us any detail. If one said there's no visible
means of propulsion and the other said, oh, well, there is.
Well then explain what that visible means of propulsion is,
please. So you can see the parallel
narrative. You can see that the correct
eyewitness counts being, you know, pretty much covered up and
put down right off the bat. The article goes on since on
August 12th 2023, investigative journalist Ross Coulter shared
his thoughts at the Victorian State Library as part of an
event called close Encounters Australia.
He talked for around 2 hours, including an hour long Q&A
session where he told the audience some interesting things
he had learned about the Alaska shoe downs.
Now Coulter wanted to be clear about something.
He was not completely sure about the things he talked about.
He thinks they are true, but he was not completely confident, he
said. I'm happy to be proved wrong,
but it would be very, very interesting to see an
explanation from the White House.
What he found interesting is that some of the people he
talked to who knew about defense and secrets said that something
weird had happened in Alaska. Then it says listen to this
carefully. Ross Coulter says he has been
told that the object intercepted in Alaska in February 2003 was
was anomalous. Something was seen to fall off
the object when hit by the missile that the anomalous
object kept on going. And then there's a link to the
Twitter there says can you update us on the sphere and the
US shoot downs from February? This question was asked by
someone in the audience to which Coulter replied on the balloons.
We're talking here about the balloons here in February, the
February shoot downs. Now to give you some official
response to this, I think a very senior defense official was just
recently quoted in the newspapers saying there's
nothing alien or extraterrestrial about the shoot
downs, about the objects that were shot down.
Well, that's the typical parallel narrative where they
just ignore the truth, he continued.
I thought that was a very interesting comment because the
information I have is that two of the objects were indeed
prosaic. They were just mundane objects,
probably weather balloons. But there is an abundance now of
sources, including a guy who, hey, literally, he literally
lives at the end of the world in Alaska where this object was
encountered by an F22 jet. Now I wonder if this guy he's
talking about is not this fellow who made the post on YouTube.
And I as I understand it, those posts are now gone.
But you see this 10 minute video, he's talking about the
UFO being shot down and you're seeing multiple military
aircraft flying to and from the site where we believe this thing
was shot down at. And Coltart talked about one of
the things that got shot down in Alaska.
He said it was not like the other two things.
It was different or anomalous. He mentioned he could be wrong,
but this is what he had heard. According to what he learned,
the Alaska object look like a big Tic Tac.
When the F22 hit the object with missiles, something fell off,
but it kept going despite being hit.
And that's interesting, kept going after was hit.
Maybe what they're looking for there is the parts that fell off
of this thing, and this would explain why we haven't seen any
videos. Maybe they've gone from using
these Sidewinder missiles they talk so much about to using this
new UFO destroyer missile that we're gonna look at here in a
minute. If UFOs aren't real and the
military doesn't believe in UFO's, why would they
specifically have created a UFO Destroyer missile?
That's the question. There was definitely a missile
fired at an object which was described as looking a little
bit like a giant Tic Tac. Funnily enough, that's something
was seen to fall off that object that even though it was hit with
an AIM missile, which is a top of the line air to defense
missile, that object kept on going.
And I put this to different people in defense and
intelligence and I've been told, yes, the the Alaska object was
anomalous and anytime I try to get a response from anybody on
an official basis, they run 100 miles an hour, Coltart said.
Yeah, don't forget those missiles costs, I don't know,
somewhere between half a million and $650,000 I think by the time
you got all the costs figured up on them things half $1,000,000
minimum. So that's a lot of money to not
be able to bring down a weather balloon.
He spoke to other individuals who were knowledgeable about
military matters and secrets. They confirmed that the Alaska
incident was strange indeed. He wanted to learn more from
those in charge of defense, but they were unwilling to discuss
it, and when he asked them, they declined to provide an answer,
Coulthard explained. Quote But you might notice that
nobody has given a report back to the American public or the
world about what it was that the US, for the first time in
history of NORAD, they shot down something over North America.
That's an historic event. And yet we haven't been told.
Neither has America. The full story of what those
shoot downs involved. It's got a good point.
First time in the history of NORAD.
They shot something down over our own country, but they won't
show us the cockpit video of this thing being shot down.
I mean, couldn't they just blow it up a little bit if they had
to? Come on, Some people find
Coltart's statement convincing. Because if the Alaska object was
indeed anomalous, that would explain why the Department of
Defense responded to a Freedom of Information Act request for
information about the object by referring the request to
Advanced Aerial Research organization, a ARO.
It's like this Chinese boxes or Russian boxes, where if you call
them, you know, you have the little boxes 1 nestled into
another. It's compartmentalized.
And this is what they do with UFO data.
They compartmentalize it first. They'll normally try to conceal
it with a within multiple departments inside the
Department of Defense. And then if they really want to
hide it, they'll outsource it to some private space corporation,
you know, and you can kind of tell which ones play ball, don't
you? I mean, got to wonder, maybe
maybe Elon Musk? For all his faults, he still
seems to be on the outside. I saw he just got sued SpaceX
did last week for the government saying that they're not hiring
enough out of country people to work on this top secret rocket
stuff. I don't know, I kind of thought
you had to be a U.S. citizen to get that top secret clearance,
but doesn't seem to matter if you're not playing their game,
they're going to find a way to inflict law fair on you.
Below was response from the Department of Defense about a
FOIA request submitted on February 11th, 2023 asking for
several data presumably collected during the Alaska
object shot down on February 10th, 2023.
Yeah, people have been asking for these cockpit videos and
this one here is a specifically asking one about the about the
one that was shot out of Alaska and what kind of response did
they get? Well, the DoD says this responds
to your Freedom of Information Act FOIA request requesting all
available visual data, photographs and visual and
infrared spectrum films, invisible and infrared spectrum
drawing and all related visual information and tracking data,
radar cylinder data, timer data, data that were presumably
gathered about the object that was shot down at 1:45 PM Eastern
Standard Time on February 10th, 2022 Over Alaska, over Alaska.
You know Alaska is a big state. We are providing a no records
response and subject to your request.
In other words go # sand. After a lengthy and exhaustive
search through multiple offices on Elmdorf Air Force Base, it
has been determined that this request should be sent to the
All Domain Anomaly Research office which falls under the
Defense Intelligence Agency. If excuse me, you can send a
request to their office through the contact below.
It is intriguing, the author says, to mention that there
seemed to be no records at Elmdorf Air Force Base, Alaska
about this case. This is puzzling because the
base should have been involved in the mission to recover
whatever was related to this case.
Well, sure, one or two things. Either they're just, they're
just blowing smoke up your backside or the minute black
have come in and handle this thing, you know?
I'm sure they've got a process by which they do that.
Even more fascinating, the request for information under
the federal under the Freedom of Information Act is being sent to
the all domain Anomaly resolution Office.
Yeah, so they can dump it right into the circular file, which is
a part of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
This is happening even though officials describe the objects
in question as likely mundane, likely mundane as how would you
have reached that conclusion. So that's kind of a refresher on
what happened in February 10th, just about a year and a half
ago. And we know we have to wonder
what's going on. Why won't they give us this
video? And like I said, part of it
could be because they're using this new weapon on these things
or they've developed a new weapon in response to these,
this UFO Destroyer missile, Something definitely I think is
seen as a threat there by people in power.
And I noticed before I get to this missile, this press release
that came out at just this year. I misspoke.
I said the shot the shoot down happened on in 20/22.
It was 2023 if this year articles from the office of Mike
Dunleavy and he's a governor of Alaska.
Governor Dunleavy issue statement on unidentified object
shot down over Alaska February 10th, 2023.
So he was on it. Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy
issues the following statement today regarding the unidentified
object shot down this morning over Alaskan waters.
Today's announcement by the Pentagon that an unidentified
object was shot down by an F22 from Joint Base Elmendorf
Richardson over Alaska's coastline raises serious
national security concerns that should concern every American.
I want to thank our Alaska based military for eliminating the
potential threat before it was flying over our land.
Does that sound like a weather balloon to you?
Does that sound like a hobby balloon to you?
And also they mentioned this Elmdorf, Joint Base Elmdorf.
These are the guys that said, oh, we looked all over the place
and we couldn't find a thing about this crash.
Yeah, you better get a hold of Aero and they can tell you that
they've never seen a UFO. This latest intrusion into our
airspace raises serious questions about the White
House's decision to not shoot down a Chinese spy ball in last
week when it was above the Aleutian chain and prevent it
from flying over important military sites in the lower 48.
Unlike other states, Alaska is truly on the frontier lines.
Because of our close proximity to the neighbors, to our
neighbors, there is very little margin for error.
Russian territory is only a few miles away.
We are the one state closest to the Korean Peninsula and China.
Alaska is truly on the front lines.
Always got a point and man, if you've ever been in an airplane
flying over, I mean a high altitude over Alaska, it's
amazing. Just the amount of desolate is
what I would call a mountainous landscape.
Not a tree, not a blade of grass, just miles and miles and
miles of Gray mountains with the white snow caps.
So there's all kinds of places up there, but you could hide
something like this. The article goes on and says the
governor says as such decisions need to be made quickly to
preserve the territorial integrity of Alaska and the
United States. This incident is further
evidence that the military by the military capability of
Alaska is robust. An important decision should
ensue about improving those capabilities including Ice
Breakers, Army, Air Force and Navy capabilities.
Looks like a little bit of a play for more money there in the
last few days. If the last few days are any
indication, this may be the new norm and we must be prepared.
The Alaska National Guard is working closely with US NORTHCOM
and other agencies to provide any support is requested.
Yeah, you know the any finishes up the problem with with
treating these things, all of these UF O's like there's some
sort of incoming bomb is that you don't know what you're
shooting at. And I'm a little hesitant to get
the entire Air Force scrambled up there, just spending all day
shooting these things down. Now, I would encourage you to
watch this video. The, the link I got was from
reddit.com and somebody had reposted it there.
Really something gives you an idea of what this landscape
looks like. I mean, just as far as the eye
can see, just snow and you know, I think mountains off the
distance and then the sea off to the north.
And he talks about it being like 5 or 6 miles away to the sea.
And then I think it might have been a mile or or better maybe 5
miles out on the sea ice. This February.
So of course the sea ice is actually frozen and that's where
we don't know if it was an actual UFO itself or parts of
that UFO and tumbled to the to that snow pipe packed ice and
that's where these guys would have landed these these big
recovery planes on to try to find.
Now the scary thing is, is they shot this thing, but they
described this as a Tic Tac UFO. And from what I'm seeing and
that article you just read, is that this thing was fired on,
but that it didn't actually destroy the UFO.
As we were led to believe that the UFO itself escaped, but that
some part of this machine had fallen off as this tic Tac
shaped UFO itself fled the area. Or maybe flood into another
dimension or just whatever they do, I don't know, scary stuff.
So I'll finish up here with this idea of this UFO Destroy YOUR
missile, because that's what we're asking.
Has the US now become so concerned about these UF O's and
the fact that they were unable to shoot this one down and fully
dispatch it in Alaska that they've gone to the trouble of
creating a special UFO Destroyer missile?
Now this article comes to us from hitc.com.
It says unconfirmed videos showing UFO Destroyer missile
launched by U.S. military are thrilling and it's written by
Adisha Campbell dated August 24th, 2023 from the UK.
She says UF O's have become a hot topic over the past few
months and now unconfirmed videos showing the US military
using a UFO Destroyer missile to blast an unidentified object in
the sky are making rounds on social media.
Oh my goodness. If that's the case, that means
that we have yet another UFO shot down by these guys.
Ever since the UFO whistleblower David Gres's explosive claims
about the extraterrestrial beings and technology being
present on Earth, the topic of UFOs and aliens has generate has
generated worldwide interest. He claimed that the US
authorities allegedly possessed nonhuman biologics.
Also that secret UFO programs were in place.
Now every other day claims of UFO spottings around the world
pop up. In the midst of it all, A few
videos on TikTok show what has been claimed as a military using
a UFO destroyer to stop unidentified foreign objects
from entering Earth. This is interesting on a couple
of levels actually. This is TikTok.
Remember Chinese owned company? And so it might be a little
difficult for our own deep state to get access to the source code
of this program and maybe that's why this stuff is coming up
there first. Or it could be some kind of a
sigh up from the Tricons. So this is the sort of thing
that we'll have to proceed with caution on.
It goes On it says unconfirmed videos U.S. military UFO
Destroyer Missile Surface In the past few days, a few tick
talkers have shared videos that have caused others to wonder if
the US military has ever used a UFO destroyer.
The videos in question show a missile being launched from the
ground toward three floating objects in the sky.
After they reach a certain altitude and get closer to the
bright object in the middle, the object itself moves forward and
crashes with the missile. Now why would it move forward
and crash with the missile? Another video seemingly shows a
different angle of missiles being launched at a giant UFO.
Even though some of the videos on TikTok claim that these
missiles were launched by the US military, there is no
confirmation about the same. The visuals may well be CGI.
The clips have also left viewers divided, with some convinces
real while others don't believe them at all.
At the time of writing, no official reports about a missile
launched to destroy UF O's have been released by the military.
Now then it goes on talks a little bit about some of the you
just before I finish this article up and you have to.
That's the problem with this TikTok is people aren't if they
aren't attaching to their names to the stuff and giving us an
idea where the stuff was was actually recorded at.
We end up with a situation that was no better than the original
TikTok videos, where people were allowed to post some on their
websites with their, you know, their own company watercolors
branded to them. And then a year later, two years
later, the government comes out and says, Oh yeah, that's all
real. It could be such a thing that
some insider has done this, has released these things, and this
is a way for them either to get information out that they're
afraid to talk about, or it could possibly be a limited
hangout. But it would make sense if the
US government had created a UFO destroyer, if for no other
reason to protect their own, their their own interest.
Now it goes on here says U.S. government shot down 4
unidentified objects in 2023. Yeah, just like we said.
By February 2023, the US government had shot down 4
unidentified objects spotted over the North American skies.
And one of the first objects to be shot down in 2023 was the
alleged Chinese spy balloon. Pretty sure that wasn't just the
alleged because the Chinese got really upset about it.
Another one was shot down near Alaska just a few days later.
Not a balloon that we can see look more like a Tic Tac UFO.
And like we said, it may not have been the entire UFO that
was shot down, but just parts of that UFO. 1/3 undentified object
came down near Canada. That's up in the Yukon, so that
would be on the eastern edge of Alaska.
The authorities described the objects as being cylindrical.
Sounds like another Tic Tac to me.
Another balloon spotted over Montana was also eliminated.
I think they're getting their stories mixed up.
They're they're, I know, I see what they're doing.
They're forgetting the one that was shot down over Huron.
OK And there was been a lot of argument.
First that was described as a UFO and then you had all the
talk about a hobby balloon. I don't believe for one minute
that it was a balloon 3UFO spotted over Nevada.
It says. In the past week, footage of
alleged UF O's in Nevada began spreading on TikTok.
The viral video shows 3 flying saucers supposedly flying over
the desert. The Ufo's fit the description of
a flying saucer. The disc like object can be seen
slowly flying in the sky as jet planes chase them.
Like every video about Ufo's, that one too has divided opinion
on social media. While the tech talk videos are
fun to watch, the problem is a lot of times it's just something
someone throws up online or maybe it gets gets shared or
pushed it somewhere else, and we oftentimes do not have a good
record of chain of custody. It looks as though the the the
United States Defense Department or whoever could very well have
employed a UFO destroyer missile, and that would explain
that would make sense. Concerning the fact that it
appears as though that UFO that we were told was shot down
Alaska, the UFO itself actually was not shot down from the
sounds of it. Actually what happened is the
UFO might have been damaged. Part of that UFO might have just
been fell to the ground. What we do know is that the
government is refusing to share any of the video from that
event. They're refusing to share any of
the reports around that event. So we're being kept completely
in the dark about it. We've been given multiple
different stories by government sources.
So who should we believe that the the first story that came
out that yes a pilot saw this and this was a Tic Tac shaped
UFO or the later stories that come out to say, well this may
or may not have been a weather balloon.
Either way you look at it, it's clear to me that the government
realizes that they are no match for these UFO's and they're
doing the only thing that they know how to do and that is to
create a bigger missile to attack the problem.
Until next time, this is UFO Warning.
Over and out.