Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're talking about Pilot sees UFO do 180 in
less than a second. That's correct.
Pilot sees UFO do a 180 in less than a second.
This article comes to us from brobible.com.
Before I get into the article though, I just want to quickly
say thanks to everybody who leaves the great comments over
at the Spotify site. It's always cool to have
encouragement from the listeners, and I appreciate the
support that I get over there financially and what you guys do
when you leave Such awesome, insightful and thoughtful
comments about the program. This article is headlined
Airline Pilot Describes Witnessing a UFO Turn 180° in
Less Than a Second and it's written by Douglas Charles.
Dated February 27th, 2024. It says audio of an American
Airlines pilot reporting a UFO turn 180° in less than a second,
then vanishing from the sky, has gone viral on TikTok with over
1,000,000 views while flying from Boston to Harrisburg.
I'll play that for you just a second here, but we'll just read
through the transcripts real quickly.
It the pilot says, well you're going to think I'm crazy,
there's something that just went from right to left to right in a
blink and then flashed his lights 3-4 times, the American
Airlines pilot tells air traffic control control says, OK, well I
had an airplane crew cross from right to left E 175, and now
there's another one, a 777 up there high off the right side
that descended to 28. The air traffic controller
responded back. That might be those two
aircraft, I'm not sure. And the pilot responds this
thing 180° in like a second, the pilot responded.
So you see the first thing that the air traffic control person
tries to do is dismiss the report.
People just don't like to do the extra work, let me tell you.
Then there the ground control says, oh goodness, the air
traffic controller set back. Oh, all right.
Yeah. Let me know if you see it again.
We'll make a report. So in other words, OK, you saw a
UFO. Well, I really don't want to
have to write a report on that because that would make my job
contain more work and I've got to get home after work.
And I don't feel like sitting around writing a port.
But hey, if something happens again, let me know, will you?
This is why we need a different reporting system, something that
goes completely cuts these eight.
These ground, you know, the ground crews and the government
out of it. Just put the report online, you
know that's what you got to do. Well, the details, it literally
went from one coast to the other in front of us.
Then it went up like 30°, turned off its lights or whatever it
had the pilot is that heard explaining.
It looked like it's a bright orangey thing and then since we
spoke to you last, it flashed us like 3-4 times and it's still we
are still looking at it now. So even though the air traffic
control person tries to put the pilot off and say well if you
see it again we'll we'll we'll do a report, Obviously they
weren't interested in reporting this thing.
The pilot so impacted by this that they go ahead and tell the
the air traffic control person what they saw.
Anyway, the air traffic control person is really not that
interested because if a pilot reports a UFO to them, they
might have to fill out a report and that's extra work and
they're not interested in extra work.
But the pilot, on the other hand, has been probably
emotionally impacted by this thing, and he feels the need to
talk about it. That's what humans do when they
see something that's crazy. Now they're ordinary.
Most people want to talk about it.
They want to relieve that stress of containing this secret, he
says. So the the air traffic control
person that says, so where is it?
Roughly, if I was to give you a traffic call, the air traffic
controller that ask and they say I, I would say probably 80 to 60
to 80 miles in front of us and it looks like it's coming.
I don't know, the pilot replied. It's flashing toward us.
But it is definitely not an airplane.
It doesn't have strobe lights or anything on it.
It's just this bright orange going on and off.
Yep, this definitely wasn't an airplane.
The audio produced some wild comments on technoch was some
people reclaiming they also witnessed the UFO.
Now I'm going to go ahead and play this audio between the
pilot and air traffic control and you can kind of judge for
yourself you're. Going to think I'm crazy.
There's something that just went from right to left to right in a
blink and then flashes line 3-4 times that much.
OK, well, I had an airplane crossed from right to left.
He was 75 and now there's another one at 777 up there high
off the right side that descended at 28.
That might be those two aircraft, I'm not sure.
This thing went 180° in like a second.
Oh, goodness. All right.
Yeah. Let me know if you see it again.
We'll make a report. Well the details is literally
went from one coast to the other in front of us and then it went
up like 30°, turned off its lights or whatever it had.
It looks like it's a bright orangey thing and then since we
spoke to you last, it flashed us like 3-4 times, but it's still,
we are still looking at it now. So where, where is it roughly if
you were, if I was to give you a traffic call?
I would say probably eighty 6080 miles in front of us and it
looks like something, I don't know, they're flashing towards
us, but it is definitely not an aeroplane.
It doesn't have a strobe, lights or anything, like it's just this
bright orange going on and off. Yep, this definitely wasn't an
airplane. And I have to tell you, I just
love listening to those pilot audio transcripts when they're
talking back and forth to air traffic control.
You're listening to these guys as they see these things first
hand and they're airline pilots. I mean, if they're not a
reliable witness, who is? These are the guys that you, you
get on an aluminum tube that these guys are flying sometimes
Gals and you entrust your life with these people to go
thousands of miles. You're in.
You're in on aluminum tube. And this is after you've had to
walk through the the gauntlet of TSA workers at the airport.
Take your shoes off, walk across a filthy math, be exposed to a
dose of radiation as you get X-rayed, and have all your stuff
X-rayed. Then you get on this aluminum
tube and you're traveling across the skies at 35 to 45,000 feet
on average dodging balloons By the way we'll get to one of
those stories in a minute and you're trusting your life to
this person at speeds of, I don't know, 400 to well I heard
recently 800 miles an hour. Some of these planes were
reaching last week when they were headed West to east with
with the jet stream. So you're you're putting you're
putting a trust in these people with your very life.
So this guy is flying this aluminum tube full of two 300
people whatever through the sky at 400 to 800 mile an hour and
he sees a UFO. Now how do you discount what he
sees if you can trust him to carry a couple hundred 300
people at 677 and a half maybe 8 miles up in the air, probably 7
miles up in the air. If you can trust him to do that,
how do you not trust him when he tells you that he sees a UFO?
That's that's my question that goes on here.
It says the audio produced some wild comments on TikTok with
some people claiming they also witnessed UFO.
My son was on the highway last night going to Boston and saw
the same thing and two fighter jets going after it, one person
wrote. I've seen the same thing near
West Dennis Beach on Cape Cod, said another.
OMG really, it's so crazy. The first comment I replied, my
son said that everyone on the highway stopped.
It was that wild. I seen it as well going home.
I was on the highway by Top Golf, another person claimed.
I saw the same thing. Another person commented.
A couple fighter jets chased it and it just disappeared.
Was this similar to your case? Another Tik Tokker asked.
Yes, exactly, they reply back. So there you have it.
You have this UFO spotted by an airline pilot with a load of
people on it. You have the you have the
conversation recorded going back and forth.
You have people on the ground that have seen this thing, but
you try to find a story about this online where a local news
outlets say is talking to anybody.
It seems like people have chosen to use TikTok as a social
platform on this. A little bit of a pain to use,
but you're seeing that people are trying to do some
crowdsourcing here. So we have a mass sighting of a
UFO. And the and The thing is you
have this, the the thing that's so cool about this is you have
the sighting from the air, from the airplane pilot in the air as
you record this. And then you have people on the
ground, multiple parties on the ground saying, yeah, we saw it
and we saw these two fire planes going after it.
I think this is another one of these really great sightings
where the experiencer, in this case the pilot, is recording it
as they see it happen. And they're recording it in the
form of conversation between themselves and the air traffic
control. I don't know how you get much
better than that really. And then you have eyewitnesses
on the ground confirming what the pilot is seeing.
Now, you would think this would be a big story, but I guess it's
not as catchy as the some of the headlines that we read lately.
You know, some of the stories do get traction, like the the alien
story in Miami or Las Vegas or some of these other things.
A lot of times though, these stories that are really these
these sightings rather that really do seem to deserve
attention, they seem to be ignored for the most part,
except, you know, in what is almost like an underground
Internet. And the same thing happened last
week. We talked about the quote hobby
balloon over Utah There I wanted to do a little follow up on that
and this is from midutahradio.com.
It says NORAD says high altitude balloon, likely a hobby balloon.
Now that's what they're saying here.
Other places are reporting this thing is another Chinese spy
balloon. You know, everyone's just
speculating at this point. It says NORAD says the high
altitude balloon they intercepted over Utah was likely
a hobby balloon. The small balloon was detected
at an altitude of 44,000 feet Friday, but NORAD determined it
didn't present didn't present any sort of threat to national
security. But it says the balloon was
described as being 50 feet tall carrying a small 2 foot cube.
Now I wouldn't call 50 foot tall small.
You see they're definitely trying to underplay the dangers
of this thing. Just imagine a 50 foot tall
balloon. Now we talked the other day
about how these remember, we talked about how the the
airplane traffic here. A couple weeks ago these planes
were hitting speeds of 800 mile an hour because they had a 200
mile an hour tailwind behind them.
So if we've got this balloon up here where the winds are blowing
anywhere from say 100 mile an hour to 200 mile an hour, how
can they say not be a danger? Imagine you're flying along in
an airplane, a commercial airplane with a couple 100
people on board this aluminum tube and all of a sudden you're
presented with a 50 foot tall small balloon carrying a 2 foot
cube. What's that 2 foot cube going to
do when it hits a windshield of one of these 740 sevens doing, I
don't know, 405 hundred 608 hundred mile an hour, it says.
On Saturday, NORAD made another announcement saying the balloon
was monitored from the ground until it left US airspace
overnight. They don't tell you where it
left at, OK? They don't tell you what
altitude it left at. They don't tell you what it was.
They just think it's a hobby balloon.
So what they're telling you is it's OK for random idiots on the
ground to release 50 foot tall balloons with boxes attached OK
to fly at just above the normal area of airline traffic.
Now look, if you look it up, it'll tell you that airplane
traffic travels normally at 32 to or 35 to 40 to 45,000 feet.
1000 feet is nothing, man. So you're telling me that I'm
supposed to feel safe flying along in one of these aluminum
tubes at 600 mile an hour, if 1000 feet above me, there's a 50
foot hobby balloon, hobby balloon.
Think about that. Who determines the safety of
these hobby balloons? Who determines whether or not
the cube is attached to the balloon safely?
What's to prevent one of these things from falling off into the
windshield of a passenger jet? So they have no concern.
So a lot of times, you know, we talked on this program about the
conspiracies that the Deep State participates in, all of the
nonsense that we put up with. And frequently I get hate mail
from they can't be regular listeners, but I get hate mail
from people saying, well, you're a conspiracy theorist or this or
that. Well, you have to sit there and
think about this. Would you want to put your
family on an airplane and fly them at 44,000 feet or say
42,000 feet And when you know that within a couple 1000 feet
of them there's the possibility that this hobby balloon, 50 foot
tall hobby balloon with a 2 foot cube dangling from it could be
flying over there or into their aircraft.
Now, just normal common sense would say that it's not a good
idea to let random anonymous people release 50 foot objects
into the air carrying two foot payloads, and let those objects
occupy space in or near an area where we are flying dozens or
maybe hundreds of aircraft every day.
OK, endangering the lives of thousands of people.
Now this is just common sense. Now when you think about the
fact that you have to take your shoes off and walk across a
filthy mat to get into an airplane because you might have
a bomb in your shoe, what's more likely, you having a bomb in
your shoe or one of these, quote UN quote, hobby balloons failing
at 44,000 feet and possibly crashing into a passenger jet.
I'm a lot more worried about the hobby balloon than I am about
somebody bringing a bomb onto an airplane in their shoes.
If things are this crazy, if decisions are being made that
are this illogical, we have to ask ourself what is the real
reason? Could it be that they're just
making you take your shoes off? Because it is still fear and
paranoia and panicking people? And therefore people are more
likely to put up with all the nonsense of having good to go
through Atsa gauntlet, to having to go through these X-ray
machines that were put there by Washington insiders who are
making fabulous profits off endangering us when we know when
we've been told these things can cause.
Have you have a one chance in 10,000 of getting cancer from
being exposed to this radiation? Well, these things are being
used millions of times a day or a week or whatever.
You got to think someone's gotten cancer by now.
You know, we are told that a 13 year old kid has to walk through
an X-ray body machine that shows X-ray images that are so
explicit that if you posted them on YouTube, you might get a
visit from the FBI. OK, put it that that's it's that
big a violation of privacy. We're supposed to be subjected
to all this kind of crazy nonsense, but yet when an
anonymous group of people release an object into the air
that's 50 foot tall with a 2 foot cube dangling from it,
we're told that that's safe, that there's that it's not a
national security threat Based on what evidence?
So it at the very least what you could should be able to see from
this is a complete overreaction and exploitation in response to
a terrorist threat, having to take your shoes off, being
exposed to dangerous radiation, being X-ray, being treated like
you know sheep. Compare that to a real threat to
safety, which is a 50 foot tall object with a 2 foot cube
dangling from it that has been released by unknown parties.
And we're being told, just on the face of it, this is not
dangerous. Don't worry about it.
Yeah, nothing could happen here. I mean, if your plane crashed
into it, no worries. So you cannot.
Common sense cannot exist within such a dichotomy of stupidity.
It's just not possible. Something has to be going on
here where they are exploiting us, exploiting our fears of
terror on one side. And it's almost as if they
actually do know what these things are, and they're
exploiting our normalcy bias on the other side by telling us
nothing to see here move along. I have a hard time believing
that these things are actually Mylar balloons.
You know, you have the descriptions that were made by
the pilots with these things over Alaska, at Yukon and Lake
Lake Huron. And if, you know, we have pilots
saying, no, this is not a balloon.
It's the size of a small car, You know, it's got this weird
octangular shape to it. It looks metallic.
So these things are actually being reported as UFOs, just
like we're all used to seeing. But in this particular case,
with this latest one out of Utah, it seems as if the
government is moving in very quickly to walk down the news on
this thing. We don't even know where this
thing exited at the last couple aircraft were sent up, they were
shot down. We're simply told that we
couldn't see the video. I had somebody respond, Well,
you can expect to see that video.
It's it's sad to see people that are so afraid of the truth that
they would rather remain blissfully ignorant than to seek
out what's happening here. Everything points to our own
government and this is on a worldwide level being in
collusion with whatever these things are and inclusion at at
the very least in collusion to keep us ignorant about them.
I mean, the first thing they want to call them is a spy
balloon or something along those lines.
Well, even if they are spy balloons, we shouldn't be
comfortable with these things traveling along near our air
traffic control space, you know, our our traffic lanes.
They are a danger to anybody on that airplane.
So just ask yourself, do we really expect disclosure from
the very people who tell us that when we do come across these
UFOs, the first thing they do is they define them as balloons,
Hobby balloons. That apparently is the new is
the new meme of the day to describe UFOs and that they
automatically we are to assume that they pose no danger even
though they're right in the way. I mean let's just say you had
somebody on on Interstate and they were flying around in in a,
they were flying a drone around in the Interstate, say at at
1011 feet off the ground. Well, you could say well it's
not at the same level as the traffic, but at the same time
you might say, well we don't know who's floating that drone
around. Maybe that drone could drop a
couple feet and go through the windshield of a semi truck and
kill a bunch of people. You know, we wouldn't allow
that. That wouldn't be that wouldn't
be tolerated. We would not tolerate unknown
parties hovering drones around 8 to 10 foot off of.
The the highway on the Interstate and at traffic lane
we would say well, even though that drone is not like say
directly at eye level, you know from a from a driver's
perspective it's close enough to the highway and the fact that we
don't know who's flying these things that we have to get them
out of there. So common sense would dictate
you don't allow drones to be flown 10 or 12 foot off the
surface of the Interstate Rd. That's just common sense.
But when you extrapolate this out and look at these so-called
hobby balloons, which I'm just going to call them UFOs, because
we don't know what they are and they're flying and they're
unidentified. But when you take these things
out and you fly them just above the normal air traffic lanes,
we're told by the government there's nothing to worry about.
There's no violation of safety. The same people that tell you to
take your shoes off and walk across a filthy mat to get on an
airplane because you might have a bomb in your shoe, or telling
you that UFOs, whatever they are, hobby balloons as they call
them, flying just above the normal altitude of air traffic
is not a problem. Well, I see the problem here.
I see the problem is to me that we have people that can't
recognize and define risk to us. And those are the people that
are telling you. They'll give you disclosure when
they're good and ready. Until next time, this is UFO
Morning over and out.