That's 83 the big ones survive though, met though.
Many are buried beneath the grass.
Wow, moving them over. Nearly 200 miles or craggy
terrain, with no wheels. Would have been a huge task.
They are two meters tall and weigh between 1 and 3 tons.
Okay. I'm sorry the blue ones with a
smaller ones. So they move these things it
says nearly 200 miles or craggy. Train, you go, if you go on
Google Maps, Look, I did. This is not flat terrain up and
down Hills. So even a stone that weighs
6,000 pounds, just imagine dragging a dump truck, say up
and down those Hills, a small dump truck 6,000 pounds.
Really, it says, pre-migration chemical analysis of ancient
human remains near Stonehenge. Reveal these people grew up in
West Wales or Keith contain elements from local rock that
would Of seeped into their plants and meat.
It is a hypothesis at the moment, but people.
But perhaps, what you're looking at is a migration of some people
from West, Wales to the Salisbury Plain area, says
Roberts. The research was led by
Professor Mike Parker Pearson and archaeologist with the
University of London. He now believes that Stonehenge
was built as a monument to the ancestors and contrast to all
the structures built out of Timber, which were associated
with the living. He says these Stones were Are
clearly really valuable to them. They would have been absolutely
key ancestral emblems. You know, you have to ask
yourself, how could a group of people who, who hadn't invented
the wheel who at best were subsistence Farmers.
Maybe just grazing these Fu domesticated animals.
How would they had the time or the excess energy to do this?
It says the chances are, we'll never know for sure why the
stones removed but Person likes that mystery for Roberts.
The discovery that really captured Her Imagination came
thanks to a meal of hazelnut eaten by a quarry.
Worker. Around 5,300 years ago.
During an excavation, what turned out to be a key blue
stone quarry. The archaeologists discovered,
the charred remains of some hazelnut shells that had been
thrown into the campfire. Carbon dating revealed that they
dated to 3300 BC 5,300 years ago.
It was already known. The blue stones have been
quarried in Wales but the shells showed this was done more than
three centuries before Stonehedge was erected on
Salisbury. Plain that left us with the
mystery because where did they go?
Did it take them four hundred years to haul those stones to
Stonehenge? And I suspect not says, Parson.
I thought there must be another place close by that.
These Stones were initially destined for.
And the rest as they say, is history, Jeffrey.
Monmouth was a great medieval storyteller.
Who lived in the 12th century. He says, he is best known for
his stories of popularized. The myth, the King Author, but
many that may have also have a role to play in the mystery of
Stonehedge Geoffrey of Monmouth tells this extraordinary story
about Stonehedge being a stone circle that Merlin brought back
from Ireland. It's obviously a myth they say
that. There's a big battle in Ireland
role in having stolen the Big Stone Circle.
Brings it back to Salisbury Plain, but you just wonder if
there's a grain of Truth in it. That there's some kind of folk
memory of the Stone Circle. Having been moved from the West
off the Salisbury. That's turned into this Legend.
Interesting that he says, Merlin, of course, Merlin, was
this legendary Wizard? And this could to my mind, be
some sort of UFO connection, there, some sort of alien
connection kind of along the lines of what we've seen with
the ancient alien stuff on the History Channel.
It's something we'll never be able to prove, but it's
delicious, as a story. And it may be that Is a grain of
Truth in it. She said that's all fine, and
good. This interesting story that how
maybe these things record at this Quarry.
There, a move to a, you know, to this first Stonehenge type
monument and then after a few hundred years, these people
migrated South and they drugged all these rocks down there with
them. And then they expanded the
complex with these bigger rocks, blah, blah, blah.
All seems pretty implausible to me.
You know, the fact, this all happened over 5,000 years ago
before the invention of the wheel.
Will you know when people are are very technologically not
Advanced stage that they would go to the trouble do this.
But then you overlay that on top of the idea that we find out
that Stonehenge has been just completely altered multiple
times in the last hundred years to make it look the way.
They think it should have looked for whatever reason and they're
not doing this out in the open, we can have a have a Precision
about it. This is all been done really
clandestinely and almost to the point of being under the cover
of Darkness. I mean, it's happened back in
the 50s, nobody's advertising it and no one's coming forward to
say, oh yeah, this is how it happened.
So, you have, you, you have this kind of, really confusion
deception, and kind of cloudiness over this whole thing
of Stonehenge on both ends of the story.
What was done to it? You know, in modern times as far
as Rebuilding it and how it got there in the first place.
We never have been able to do a really thorough archaeological
examination of this site because it's been altered too much.
So we're aliens involved. Who knows?
How would you know? Everything's been completely
Disturbed. There, you almost need to go
back and look at the same from War.
People, capable of moving these kinds of massive Stones those
distances 5,000 years ago with nothing more than brute
strength. And Oops.
There'd be an easy way to prove this.
The people to think that that was possible.
These are collage these archaeologists and academics and
non-believers they could disprove.
All of us people who have questions by simply getting a
couple hundred people together and seeing if they can move say
a 10 or 12,000 pound Rock. See if they could drag it, I
think 180 miles. See how long it would take him
to do that and whether that seems like it would be a
possibility for Ancient Man, 5,000 years ago.
Until now, Next time, this is UFO warning or burnout.
Hello and welcome to the program.
You'll fall morning in this episode were talking about.
What's up with Stonehenge? That's correct.
What's up with Stonehenge? Now, look This Magnificent
Monument. We just assume sometimes that
that's the way the Ancients left it.
Yep. It's been there just like that
for 5,000 years but you know, that's not actually the case.
Not only has Stonehenge has been remodeled a few times.
We have to ask a question was even possible for people five
years ago. People without the Convenience
of the wheel, to drag those stones, some weighing up to, I
guess, what? 40,000 50,000 and 80,000 pounds,
to drag those things for 2030 miles, even a smaller ones at
five ten, twenty thousand pounds, dragging those things
for up to 180 miles reportedly. So, let's take a look.
This first article here from the people's voice dot TV.
It says old Stonehenge. Pictures show a temp to cover
up. True origin.
Now, this is dated June 1st 2017.
Now, you know, you're onto something.
If you just type in stone and hinge cover up or Stonehenge,
you know, rebuild and you'll come across dozens of Returns on
the search engine debunking. The idea that Stonehenge has
been rebuilt. Well, here's a pictures right
here. Obviously, there's been a lot of
work done that site. It was not in the current
condition you know 100 or 200 years ago say or even 50 years
ago. It says, previously unseen
footage graphs of Stonehenge reveal that the ancient stone
complex, and Wiltshire England was rebuilt and moved around by
authorities. So as to obscure their true
nature well whether it was to obscure the true nature or not I
guess you can't prove that by they certainly move things
around and now they don't want to talk about the fact that they
did that between 1901 1964, the majority of the Stone Circle was
renovated in such a way that it left the stove.
Was completely and forever changed from their original
state. It says Ancient Ancient code.com
reports according to what we have known for quite some time.
Now, the incredible Stone complex and wheelchair England
was built according to archaeologists and studies
somewhere from 3000, BC to 2000 BC, radiocarbon dating and 2008
suggested. The first Stones were raised
between 2400 2200 BC so over 4,000 years old.
And whilst another theory suggests that blue stones may
have been raised at the site as early as 3000 BC.
So, you know, there's this idea that they actually drug some of
those stones from a previous site.
Clear down to the stone head site like 140 to 180, mile trip
dragging, these enormous rocks. It says, according to a new
study, by archaeologists and geologist, from the University
College, London, the stones of Stonehenge originated and
Presley Hills. Pembrokeshire 225 million
kilometers. So that's going to be what like
160 miles from one of the most enigmatic ancient monuments on
the planet Stonehenge. Even though researchers believe
the stones originated from the Presley Hills since about
nineteen twenty and they never knew the exact location from
where the stones record from adding to the mystery about
ancient mankind, managed to transport the boulders.
Researchers are questioning the age of the monument ancient
people. Corey the stone sometime between
3400 BC and 3200 BC. While the monument was mauled, a
monument was constructed according to the mainstream
Scholars around 2900 BC. This means that the ancient
Monument could be in fact, 500 years older than previously
thought. Yeah, either that or they just
cut these rocks out and it let him lay around for 400 years.
You know and while we're talking about moving these things some
some scientists are now saying that maybe they floated these
things down down their local River.
You know I've yet to see how ancient man could put ten twenty
thirty thousand pound rocks on read or small tiny wooden rafts
and Float them down a river. We've heard the same thing about
the pyramids in Egypt, missed makes no sense to me.
And I've never seen it replicated by the way.
Way. But while these details have
come to light in recent years, many people are unaware that
Stonehenge as we see it today was, in fact, rebuilt several
times and dozens of images. Prove the standing stones, we
see today in fact, dates back to lesson 50 years as noted in
trickly by India media.org. UK from 1901 to 1964, the
majority of the Stone Circle was restored in a series of
makeovers, which have left it in the words of one archeologist as
a Product of the 20th Century Heritage industry.
There you go industry. I think I solder make it about
six million dollars. A year less upkeep, they play,
but two million and it's not even possible but they're making
four five, six million dollars a year.
Just in tourism off the site minimum and I think it's
probably a lot lot more than that.
Sadly, the truth is that the monument.
We see today was rebuilt as far back, as 1901.
When restoration process is caused Great outrage.
But was rarely referred to in official guidebook.
So the people that are living, their knew that they were
cutting Corners breaking the rules, but I books aren't
talking about it while it's a money thing.
William gal oversaw. The first major restoration of
the monument which involved the straightening and concrete
setting of sarsen stone. Number 56, which was in danger
of falling over and straightening the stone.
He moved it about a half a meter.
What's that about a foot and a half or so, from its original
position. Hey no big deal, man.
We'll just move it where we need to move it to during the 1920
restoration. William Holly who had excavated
nearby old sarum, excavated the base of six stones and the outer
ditch Richard Atkinson Stewart Peugeot and John FS stone, RE
excavated much of Holly's work in the 1940s and 50s and
discovered the carved axes and daggers on the sarsen stones.
These guys are moving so fast and weren't even paying
attention to what they were doing.
They're making discovers as they go along that the other guy
didn't notice his, he was hurling moving these Stones
around is crazy and 1958. The stones were restored.
Again, when 3 of the standing sarsens were re-erected and set
in concrete basis, the last restoration was carried out in
1963 after Stone. 23 of the sarsen circle fell over
Cambridge University, archaeological archivist and
leading Stonehedge author, Christopher.
Chippendale admitted not much. What we see is to unhinge.
Hasn't been touched in some way. In other words are rewriting
history and historical research student Brian Edwards who
recently revealed that the nearby, every monument had been
totally rebuilt. Has found rear pictures of
Stonehenge being restored, he said it has been as if Stone Age
had been historically cleansed for too long.
People have kept have been kept in the dark over the Stonehenge
restoration work. I'm astonished by how few people
know about It it is. It is wonderful.
The guidebook is going to tell the full story in the future and
they got some pictures here. Let me tell you what they're
doing their very best to debunk this stuff, but it, it's just
clearly pictures that were taken in part of the historical
record, but it's just like something out of 1984.
Something as simple Stonehenge, they want to control the
narrative on that. What did they find there that
they don't want us to know about, what are they covering up
at Stonehenge. That's so important to them to
just rearrange these rocks. And then try to pretend like
this is the way they found them. Look these things have been
there for five thousand years. They look like they've been
knocked over by a flood just like the megalithic stuff down
in South America does. But yet we're we are like to
believe that. Oh no, these are in perfect
condition. They've been just like this.
When we know from written Accounts at back in the 1780s
that these things were laying down the field knocked over
this, just goes to show you how governments will act in
collusion with Local governments industry or whatever because you
know what a rebuilt Stonehedge once been secretly rebuilt, so
that people can imagine, this is exactly how it was, you know,
five thousand years ago, if they can come up with, come up on
this thing, a pristine condition brings in a lot more Revenue, a
lot more tourist dollars than a naturally, aged and knocked down
version of Stonehenge, which was what you would expect to see
after 5,000 years. Can you say, You're being lied
to and something as simple as this, secondly, besides the
money being a motive. What are they covering up here?
What are they moving? All the stuff around for without
doing proper archaeological. Surveys.
What are they hiding? Now, I want to take a look at a
couple other inconsistencies here around Stonehenge.
As we asked, was it even possible for Ancient Man to move
Stones this large? And why would they bother?
So just to get a quick idea about the size of these stones,
I'm going to go to this article here from history and
numbers.com, and I'll put these on the website, buy me a coffee.
You can go over there and take a look at the links and stuff and
if you feel real generous, you can drop a couple bucks off for
the program. It helps.
But look, it says, how are the, how big are the stones at
Stonehenge and then it goes on. And says, here's the idea of it
above the great trial off the trilithon center right in the
image above, it says, was the largest of the five trilithon.
It's just one upright, Remains the other upright.
Lies broken on the ground. Alongside the Fallen lintel.
Okay, so it says the big one here, 10 meters.
So, what 34, 35 feet, the original length of the Fallen
up, right? From the great trilithon.
So I'm 55 and then it has nine millimeter or nine meter or
that's about what 27, 28 feet, the approximate length of the
tallest Stone Still Standing remaining upright of the great
trilithon. That's that's what's above
ground 7, m, 22 feet. Say the height, the height, this
upright reaches above the ground, here's 12.
For M 35. Tons about 70,000 pounds.
The weight of the largest saracen Stones.
The I've also seen those estimated 40 tons, that's 80,000
pounds 80,000 pounds. Now, imagine that that's the
weight of a fully loaded 18-wheeler semi truck.
Now these guys are the big ones out.
There are supposed to pull those from from 20 miles away.
Now supposedly somehow amazingly part of that Journey might have
been by water really you're telling me that 5,000 years ago.
Primitive man had the had the capacity to build a boat or a
raft that would carry an 80,000 pound Rock.
I'd like to see that I would. If that was so easy to do, I
would like to see these archaeologists replicate that
should be should be no problem for them to do that then should
it? No matter whether it was
imaginarily carried by water or land.
It was moved some 20, some miles 80,000 pounds.
Imagine dragging an 80,000-pound semi tractor-trailer load
through the dirt with no wheels on that tractor.
Imagine how much force that takes, they say, the average
person can drag a third of their own body weight and these guys
back then, maybe they're weighing 160 170 pounds.
Let's just say 40 50 pounds each you're talking about.
Two thousand people to drag one of these things, 2,000 people in
an area where from what I've read had a population of around
100,000 people. Max.
So at 100 thousand, what do you have?
Maybe 20,000 a healthy male. So they could do this.
You're taking ten percent of your population out to go on a
summer long trip. To drag these rocks down to
wherever, you're going to put them up, at makes no sense to
me, man. I just cannot believe that
ancient people would have had the technology or the strength.
Just the Human Manpower. I would like to see.
I would like to see these. These Believers get a two
thousand or two thousand man crew together.
These guys that believe this was all done by you know, hand
power. I would like to see them to get
a couple a couple thousand college students together and
drag one of these 80,000-pound rocks for twenty or Thirty
miles, drag, one of these 10,000 lb rocks for 150 to 180 miles.
I challenge them. Here's one says 20 tons, is
average weight of these up right to the big upright rocks that
you see there at Stonehenge 40,000 pounds is the average
weight. Okay?
Up to 83 m is average length of this, arsenal of the sarsen
circle lentil. So the big, the big the big
rocks going across the top. Those are about 10 foot, each
10, ft H, 6 tons, it says are three times rare.
That's 6,000 pounds, and the weight of the largest now if
they're using metric tons there. To be even more.
They'd be like 6,600 pounds 40 tons is the weighted heel stone.
That's a great big old, kind of heel shape, Rock off to the
side. That's 80,000 pounds.
Now, tons, if that's if it's a metric tons, you know, you can
add 10% to. That's going to be 88 thousand
pounds said, tremendous Rock. Imagine dragging an 88 thousand
pound rock across the dirt. Across the dirt for 20 miles.
I just don't see how it was done.
And if it was done that way, then please, I would just like
to see these guys. Get maybe a hundred guys
together and pull one of these 8,000-pound rocks for 20 miles.
See how that works out for him. How did these ancient people?
What their limited, you know, living on subsistent
agriculture. How did they feed these?
It would be like taking a major military campaign under you have
to feed these guys. For however long it takes them.
How many miles a day? Can they make it?
Wow. Anyway I'm gonna look at this
next article, I heard before you finish up now.
This next article gives us a little bit more of the same kind
of official narrative, kind of compare what they're telling you
compared to what we know that Stonehedge has been rearranged
renovated rebuilt. However you want to say it
multiple times in the last hundred years that you're
talking about two different kinds of rocks, the smaller ones
by Or, I mean, 10 to 30,000 pounds drug from 160 to 180
miles away and the great big ones anywhere from, you know, 30
40 up to 80,000 pounds move, possibly up to 20 miles now.
Some scientists say, maybe somehow they figured out how to
load those things on a book, bring it down by river, but they
still had to get them off the rafts and pull them to the
building site. Myself, I don't see how ancient
man was capable of building rafts or boats or Or whatever
that could haul an 85 90 thousand pound Rock.
Just don't get it. Don't know how you got a couple
thousand guys together, if they could even pull one now, like I
said, we're told that a person can pull a third of their own
body weight. So you know, you're pulling any
thousand pound Rock, what's that?
A couple thousand people, I would like to see this
demonstrated. I would like to see them
demonstrate pulling. A 10,000 pound rock with a
couple hundred people got to sit.
Now is article here comes to us from I Co.uk says the truth
about the history of Stonehenge and how it originally stood in
Wales, major archaeological investigation.
Finds that the original section of Stonehenge was actually a
secondhand Monument. And goes on here.
It says this articles by Tim Baden written, February, 12,
2021 with Ley line sweeping through its spiritual field.
Salisbury Plain has been famed as the home of Stonehedge for
Millennia but now researchers believe that England's proud
ancient Monument is largely a secondhand structure that it
originally stood. And Wales, the Bluestone the
blue stones that made up the inner ring of the Neolithic
Landmark were thought to have been moved by sled 5,000 years.
Years Ago by a prehistoric people on an easterly.
Migration deciding to bring their ancestral emblems with
them. It seems, they took down their
Stone Circle and their Presley Hills and rebuilt it at the
current location 180 miles away and Wiltshire.
I don't know, man, does that seem reasonable to you doesn't?
It doesn't seem like the sort of thing that ancient man would be
capable of but hey, that is a startling conclusion of a
10-year. Should end of the origins of
Stonehenge and Southwest Wells at the sight of one mon, which
studies. Now, confirm was once one of the
biggest Stone circles in the British islands, for stones are
now all that remain of a structure which predated the
iconic hinge by a few centuries and may well have been the very
first such Circle and the land. Research has focused on one mon
having 110 meter diameter, okay? Two feet across.
And, you know, bigger than a football field, that is
identical to the ditch surrounding Stonehenge according
to Professor, Alex Roberts, who presents a BBC documentary on
the project on Friday, of course, has a couple year old
article. This discovery is just
incredible. I think it's the most exciting
bit of Stonehenge archaeology that's emerged during my
lifetime. Robert tells when I first heard
it I thought it did sound a bit crazy but I'm convinced that
this empty stone circle on this Bleak Hillside with just four
stones in, it was the original Stone Circle which was then
dismantled and moved to Salisbury Plain to become
Stonehenge. So, we're to believe that
Ancient Man. 5,000 years ago, took it upon himself to move
these giant Stones, 180, miles, south for whatever reason.
Like Stonehedge one mon was aligned to the solstice for
Midsummer sunrise and midwinter sunset.
Yet until most of us Stones removed in 3000 BC, that's what
they tell us but were they do we know what these Stones were
actually Four as much? You know as much remodeling work
has been going on there a few centuries later the larger
sarsens for which the Stonehenge is best known.
Today were brought from a source, 15 miles away and placed
around the outside of the blue stones which are thought to have
previously The much larger Circle today, 43 of Stonehenge
is estimated eighty three blue stones survive, though.
It may, though many are buried beneath the grass.
Wow, moving them over. Nearly 200 miles or craigie
terrain with no wheels. Would have been a huge task.
They are two meters tall and weigh between one and three
tons. So they move these things, it
says nearly 200 miles or craggy train.
Now you can you go on Google Maps?
Look and I did this is not flat terrain up and down Hills.
So even a stone that weighs 6,000 pounds, just imagine
dragon, a dump truck say up and down those Hills a small dump
truck 6,000 pounds. Really, it says, pre-migration
chemical analysis of ancient human remains near Stonehenge.
Reveal these people grew up in West Wales or teeth.
Take elements from local rock, that would have seeped into
their plants and meat. It is a hypothesis at the
moment, but people. But perhaps, what you're looking
at is a migration of some people from West, Wales to the
Salisbury Plain area, says Roberts.
The research was led by Professor Mike, Parker Pearson
and archaeologist with the University of London.
He now believes that Stonehenge was built as a monument to the
ancestors and contrast to all the structures built out of
Timber, which were associated with the The living.
He says, these Stones were clearly really valuable to them.
They would have been absolutely key ancestral emblems.
You know, you have to ask yourself, how could a group of
people who, who hadn't invented the wheel who at best were
subsistence Farmers. Maybe just grazing these Fu
domesticated animals. How would they had the time or
the excess energy to do this? It says the chances are, we'll
never know for sure. Why the stones removed?
But Pearson likes that mystery for Roberts, the discovery that
really captured Her Imagination came thanks to a meal of
hazelnut eaten by a quarry. Worker around 5,300 years ago.
During an excavation, what turned out to be a key blue
stone quarry. The archaeologists discovered,
the charred remains of some hazelnut shells that had been
thrown into the campfire. Carbon dating revealed that they
dated to 3300 BC 5,300 years ago.
It was already known the blue stones have been quarried in
Wales but the shells showed this was done more than three
centuries before Stonehedge was erected on Salisbury Plain that
left us with the mystery because where did they go?
Did it take them four hundred years to haul those stones to
Stonehenge? I suspect not says, Parson.
I thought there must be another place close by that.
These Stones were initially destined for.
And the rest as they say, is history, Jeffrey, Monmouth was A
great medieval Storyteller who live in the 12th century.
It says he is best known for his stories of popularized.
The Mythic King Author, but many that may have also have a role
to play in the mystery of Stonehedge Geoffrey of Monmouth
tells this extraordinary story about Stonehedge being a stone
circle that Merlin brought back from Ireland.
It's obviously a myth they say that there's a big battle in
Ireland and Berlin having stolen the Big Stone Circle, brings it
back to Salisbury Plain but you Just wonder if there's a grain
of Truth in it, that there's some kind of folk memory of the
Stone Circle. Having been moved from the West
off, the Salisbury. That's turned into this Legend.
Interesting that he says, Merlin, of course, Merlin, was
this legendary Wizard? And this could to my mind, be
some sort of UFO connection, there, some sort of alien
connection kind of along the lines of what we've seen with
the ancient alien stuff on the History Channel.
It's something we'll never be able to prove, but it's
delicious. As a story and it may be that
there's a grain of Truth in it. She said that's all fine.
And good. This interesting story that how
maybe these things record at this Quarry.
There, a move to a, you know, to this first Stonehenge type
monument and then after a few hundred years, these people
migrated South and they drugged all these rocks down there with
them, and then they expanded the complex with these bigger rocks,
blah, blah, blah. All seems pretty implausible to
me. You know, the fact, this all
happened over 5,000 years. Is ago before the invention of
the wheel, you know, when people are are very technologically not
Advanced stage that they would go to the trouble do this.
But then you overlay that on top of the idea that we find out
that Stonehenge has been just completely altered multiple
times in the last hundred years to make it look the way.
They think it should have looked for whatever reason and they're
not doing this out in the open. We can Of a have a conversation
about it. This is all been done really
clandestinely and almost to the point of being under the cover
of Darkness. I mean, just happened back in
the 50s, nobody's advertising it and no one's coming forward to
say, oh yeah, this is how it happened.
So you have you have this kind of, really confusion and
deception and kind of cloudiness over this whole thing of
Stonehenge on both ends of the story.
What was done to it? If you know in modern times as
far as rebuilding it and how it got there in the first place, we
never have been able to do a really thorough archaeological
examination of the site because it's been altered too much.
So we're aliens involved. Who knows?
How would you know? Everything's been completely
Disturbed. There, you almost need to go
back and look at the same from were people capable of moving
these kinds of massive Stones those distances 5,000 years ago?
With nothing more than brute strength and ropes.
There would be an easy way to prove this the people to think
that that was possible. These are collage is
archaeologist and academics and non-believers they could
disprove. All of us people who have
questions by simply getting a couple hundred people together
and seeing if they can move say a 10 or 12,000 pound Rock.
See if they could drag it I think 180 miles.
See how long it would take him to do that and whether that
seems like it would be a possibility for ancient.
Man, 5000 years ago until next time, this is UFO warning over
and out. Man, 5000 years ago until next
time, this is UFO warning over and out.