1 00:00:03,200 --> 00:00:04,700 Hello and welcome to the program. 2 00:00:04,700 --> 00:00:09,800 You have a warning, today's topic, Uso triangle, that's 3 00:00:09,800 --> 00:00:16,700 correct, Uso triangle, otherwise known as underwater submersible 4 00:00:16,700 --> 00:00:21,500 object triangle now this is the same Uso / UFO. 5 00:00:21,500 --> 00:00:25,300 We've been talking about off and on for a little bit and there's 6 00:00:25,300 --> 00:00:26,800 a couple different angles to destroy that. 7 00:00:26,800 --> 00:00:30,400 I find very interesting. It's the one that That was 8 00:00:30,400 --> 00:00:35,500 supposedly photographed. And I believe 2018 by the F-18 9 00:00:36,100 --> 00:00:40,700 fighter pilot on their iPhone. Now, while we do have a picture 10 00:00:40,700 --> 00:00:44,000 of what they're calling the cube UFO, which is, I don't know, I 11 00:00:44,000 --> 00:00:47,800 would describe it more as a jagged Cube have yet to see an 12 00:00:47,800 --> 00:00:54,300 actual photograph of this triangle shaped UFO with the 13 00:00:54,400 --> 00:00:58,800 circular lights on each corner. And that seems a little weird to 14 00:00:58,800 --> 00:01:00,200 me. Why would they just release both 15 00:01:00,200 --> 00:01:04,900 photos? I found this article on the 16 00:01:04,900 --> 00:01:11,800 rap.com the rap.com and I have a link to it on the website UFO 17 00:01:11,800 --> 00:01:14,700 morning.com. And basically what we're looking 18 00:01:14,700 --> 00:01:17,000 at here, is an interview at Tucker Carlson recently did 19 00:01:17,000 --> 00:01:20,900 concerning this Uso and the article written about it and 20 00:01:20,900 --> 00:01:22,600 some of the dialogue from that interview. 21 00:01:22,600 --> 00:01:25,100 Now, you can go onto the website and you can link on there and 22 00:01:25,100 --> 00:01:27,200 read it yourself. Where you can actually watch 23 00:01:27,700 --> 00:01:32,800 this short interview that Tucker Carlson did and Tucker Carlson. 24 00:01:32,900 --> 00:01:36,400 It does do a lot of UFO stuff. The problem that I have with 25 00:01:36,400 --> 00:01:40,900 this, it looks like from the video thumb shot that they're 26 00:01:40,900 --> 00:01:42,900 doing. They're doing what they seem to 27 00:01:42,900 --> 00:01:46,500 be doing with every single UFO. Story that comes out today. 28 00:01:46,500 --> 00:01:51,000 There they are. They're mixing and matching with 29 00:01:51,000 --> 00:01:57,200 the UFO videos from the Nimitz and their Roosevelt from 2004. 30 00:01:57,200 --> 00:02:01,100 And what the 2015 incidents, those this cockpit fighter 31 00:02:01,100 --> 00:02:02,800 videos that we've seen so many times was three. 32 00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:06,700 Of them, the Fleer, the go fast and the Tic Tac videos. 33 00:02:06,700 --> 00:02:11,100 I think. You can hardly watch anything 34 00:02:11,400 --> 00:02:15,700 online on TV or read about it and news article without having 35 00:02:16,200 --> 00:02:19,700 the snapshot of those videos as part of the article. 36 00:02:19,700 --> 00:02:24,200 And I think that while those, that is an important story, I 37 00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:30,200 think that it doesn't do service to another UFO story to just 38 00:02:30,200 --> 00:02:33,700 throw the stuff in as filler. It's more of this cut and paste 39 00:02:33,700 --> 00:02:37,600 journalism that we are subjected to on a day in day out basis. 40 00:02:38,500 --> 00:02:41,200 Now, the story from the wrap, says Tucker Carlson talks 41 00:02:41,200 --> 00:02:45,400 underwater UFOs, quote. We've never imagined something 42 00:02:45,400 --> 00:02:48,500 like that and it says, let's be honest. 43 00:02:48,800 --> 00:02:52,800 This is, this is really out of the realm Tucker gushed on his 44 00:02:52,800 --> 00:02:55,500 show Tuesday night. Well, they're talking about the 45 00:02:55,500 --> 00:03:00,300 triangle video but they're showing the video from 2015, 46 00:03:00,300 --> 00:03:05,100 2005, whatever. So that's, that's the mixing and 47 00:03:05,100 --> 00:03:07,400 matching. I'm talking about what Tucker 48 00:03:07,400 --> 00:03:09,100 really should. Talking about is. 49 00:03:09,200 --> 00:03:13,000 Hey, where is the actual picture of the triangle video? 50 00:03:13,500 --> 00:03:15,400 Now we've seen what's supposed to be the picture of the cube 51 00:03:15,400 --> 00:03:17,800 video? Show us the triangle. 52 00:03:18,300 --> 00:03:21,300 This almost seems like another one of those UFO studies 53 00:03:22,000 --> 00:03:25,600 stories, where people in the military, insiders, or possibly, 54 00:03:25,600 --> 00:03:30,000 even deep State intelligence individuals are slow, leaking 55 00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:33,300 this stuff. It's the, it's the coffee drip 56 00:03:33,300 --> 00:03:36,500 method of releasing information where they release just enough 57 00:03:36,500 --> 00:03:40,100 to get your attention. But not enough to really inform 58 00:03:40,100 --> 00:03:41,900 you and that's what's happening here. 59 00:03:41,900 --> 00:03:44,300 We're being told that somebody somewhere has pictures of this 60 00:03:44,300 --> 00:03:46,900 stuff. Well, what are they waiting for? 61 00:03:46,900 --> 00:03:51,200 Are they waiting for a substantive offer for the 62 00:03:51,200 --> 00:03:55,000 pictures from Tom DeLonge? I, I fully expect to see the 63 00:03:55,000 --> 00:03:58,400 actual picture of this thing. Released, at any time with the 64 00:03:58,400 --> 00:04:01,200 TSA water, mark stamped all over it. 65 00:04:01,300 --> 00:04:05,900 That's what I expect. Secondly, maybe I'm behind the 66 00:04:05,900 --> 00:04:08,300 times, but it seems a little bit weird that the Cedar on the 67 00:04:08,300 --> 00:04:12,700 fa-18 would be pulling out his cell phone to take pictures of 68 00:04:12,700 --> 00:04:14,000 stuff. I didn't even think those guys 69 00:04:14,000 --> 00:04:16,800 would be allowed to take a cell phone with them on a flight that 70 00:04:16,800 --> 00:04:19,399 seems strange, but I guess maybe that's how it's done. 71 00:04:19,399 --> 00:04:23,400 Now, now, the article begins is says, as he so often, does 72 00:04:23,400 --> 00:04:26,600 Tucker Carlson talked about aliens and UFOs again, Tuesday 73 00:04:26,600 --> 00:04:28,900 night at this article came out, December 15th. 74 00:04:29,000 --> 00:04:33,200 So, just a couple days ago, it says, but this time, there's a 75 00:04:33,200 --> 00:04:37,700 new wrinkle these UFOs fly. Not just in the air. 76 00:04:38,000 --> 00:04:40,600 But also underwater. Well, if you've been following 77 00:04:40,600 --> 00:04:45,500 the UFO phenomena, for any length of time, you know, that 78 00:04:45,500 --> 00:04:49,000 this is certainly not a new. Wrinkle people have been talking 79 00:04:49,000 --> 00:04:51,700 about you SOS for decades, if not longer. 80 00:04:51,700 --> 00:04:57,000 Well, Columbus, supposedly saw u.s. owes on his first voyage to 81 00:04:57,000 --> 00:04:59,600 America. It says your quote, a new report 82 00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:03,600 from American intelligence confirms something that's been 83 00:05:03,600 --> 00:05:07,700 rumored for a while late last year at US Navy. 84 00:05:07,800 --> 00:05:11,600 The fa-18 fighter jet took a very clear photograph on a 85 00:05:11,608 --> 00:05:14,700 personal phone of a triangle-shaped unidentified 86 00:05:14,700 --> 00:05:17,900 aerial phenomena. Phenomena Tucker said excitedly, 87 00:05:19,200 --> 00:05:20,600 I have to interject here a little bit. 88 00:05:20,600 --> 00:05:22,200 I'm a little disappointed with Tucker. 89 00:05:22,900 --> 00:05:25,200 You know, he got on television need to complain about Sydney 90 00:05:25,200 --> 00:05:27,700 Powell, not coming up with the evidence that he needed to 91 00:05:27,708 --> 00:05:29,400 believe that there was corruption and then lost the 92 00:05:29,400 --> 00:05:31,700 election. I mean, you ought to be able to 93 00:05:31,700 --> 00:05:33,900 watch the videos on Election night. 94 00:05:33,900 --> 00:05:35,700 See that ballots were being stuffed. 95 00:05:35,700 --> 00:05:38,400 Pretty clear. The Tucker was all over her 96 00:05:38,400 --> 00:05:42,500 about that but what I don't see is him questioning who these 97 00:05:42,500 --> 00:05:46,800 so-called intelligence sources are, you know, why aren't we 98 00:05:46,800 --> 00:05:49,700 allowed to have a clear picture of who exactly reported this 99 00:05:49,700 --> 00:05:53,000 stuff, because we shouldn't just make that shouldn't just make 100 00:05:53,000 --> 00:05:56,300 the assumption that there's not disinformation involved when it 101 00:05:56,308 --> 00:05:59,300 comes to UFO reports. The first thing that we have to 102 00:05:59,300 --> 00:06:01,600 do when we get one of these UFO reports as we have to decide 103 00:06:01,600 --> 00:06:06,500 whether it's mostly information or mostly disinformation. 104 00:06:07,200 --> 00:06:08,900 How do we do that? Well, the first step is 105 00:06:08,900 --> 00:06:12,300 deciding, what the source is, is a source believable. 106 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:18,200 Or do we even know the source is and based on what we know about 107 00:06:18,200 --> 00:06:20,900 the source, then we can make some inferences about how much 108 00:06:20,900 --> 00:06:23,200 will believe of the store, but Tucker doesn't even bother to do 109 00:06:23,200 --> 00:06:24,100 that. Apparently. 110 00:06:24,600 --> 00:06:28,000 And then it says, took a very clear photograph. 111 00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:30,800 Well, they're making a detailed description of evidence. 112 00:06:30,800 --> 00:06:34,000 But as yet, I have not seen the evidence. 113 00:06:34,500 --> 00:06:37,600 I've asked people to send me pictures of this thing or links 114 00:06:37,600 --> 00:06:40,200 if they've seen it. I haven't gotten any response so 115 00:06:40,200 --> 00:06:42,200 far. I've searched all over the 116 00:06:42,200 --> 00:06:43,600 Internet and I can't find a picture. 117 00:06:43,800 --> 00:06:48,400 I found some artist rendering I can do, I can do one of those 118 00:06:48,400 --> 00:06:49,700 myself. I might not be that good of a 119 00:06:49,700 --> 00:06:51,600 rendering but I mean, come on, someone sit down and draw a 120 00:06:51,600 --> 00:06:55,400 picture on Adobe. So right there is two big 121 00:06:55,400 --> 00:06:57,500 problems. I find is very first paragraph. 122 00:06:58,400 --> 00:07:01,700 We don't know who the source is and we having to see we haven't 123 00:07:01,700 --> 00:07:04,800 even seen the evidence. So for a guy who was really 124 00:07:04,800 --> 00:07:08,300 trash talk and somebody who's, you know, pointing out election 125 00:07:08,300 --> 00:07:11,700 fraud, just a couple weeks ago, doesn't seem to have the same 126 00:07:11,700 --> 00:07:17,700 standard when it comes to fo assertions goes on a, says that 127 00:07:17,700 --> 00:07:20,300 vehicle whatever it was appeared to be operating without 128 00:07:20,300 --> 00:07:23,000 propulsion system. That generated no visible 129 00:07:23,000 --> 00:07:25,600 exhaust hard to see how that can happen. 130 00:07:26,200 --> 00:07:28,900 The setting likely places. The UFO near a u.s. 131 00:07:28,900 --> 00:07:32,000 nuclear-powered. Aircraft carrier, that shouldn't 132 00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:34,600 be surprising because of a string of UFO sightings have 133 00:07:34,600 --> 00:07:38,100 involved nuclear reactors and Warheads there again. 134 00:07:38,100 --> 00:07:39,500 How do we know where it happened? 135 00:07:39,900 --> 00:07:42,400 If we hide the picture and the metadata behind a picture? 136 00:07:42,400 --> 00:07:44,500 Then yes, we could tell you probably Ali where it happened 137 00:07:44,500 --> 00:07:47,700 at once. Again sources are not being 138 00:07:47,700 --> 00:07:51,200 revealed the actual evidence, they're making a clear 139 00:07:51,200 --> 00:07:54,000 description of the evidence and representing it, as fact. 140 00:07:56,100 --> 00:07:57,900 I don't know if Tucker seen his pictures or night. 141 00:07:57,900 --> 00:08:00,000 Is this a has? He acts like he has, I haven't 142 00:08:00,000 --> 00:08:02,300 seen him. They don't appear to be publicly 143 00:08:02,300 --> 00:08:04,400 available. This is following the same 144 00:08:04,400 --> 00:08:08,100 trajectory as the rest of the to the academy stars. 145 00:08:08,300 --> 00:08:11,600 Revelations that came out a couple years ago and my opinion 146 00:08:11,900 --> 00:08:15,500 that is not the way to do disclosure goes on here. 147 00:08:15,500 --> 00:08:19,800 It says, but Tucker isn't just here for the rigor UFOs, he 148 00:08:19,800 --> 00:08:23,200 wanted to talk about the underwater UFOs, which behave in 149 00:08:23,200 --> 00:08:27,700 ways that science can explain. Well, I can assure the author 150 00:08:28,200 --> 00:08:33,299 that normal UFOs. Also, do not do not act in ways 151 00:08:33,400 --> 00:08:37,100 that scientists can explain. And we're starting to see that 152 00:08:37,100 --> 00:08:42,700 these phenomena Have one commonality and that is they do 153 00:08:42,700 --> 00:08:47,200 not have to obey the laws of physics as we know them to that 154 00:08:47,200 --> 00:08:49,000 end. Tucker had on Tom Rogan from the 155 00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:51,800 right wing. I'm not sure why they have to 156 00:08:51,800 --> 00:08:54,100 call the Washington examiner. Right wing. 157 00:08:54,100 --> 00:08:56,700 I think that's owned by the Moonies, but they do put some 158 00:08:56,700 --> 00:09:00,400 good stuff out, right wing Washington, examiner to talk 159 00:09:00,400 --> 00:09:03,900 about a report he wrote. Now, this is more tribalism that 160 00:09:03,900 --> 00:09:07,200 you see in the journalism world. It's very disappointing, but 161 00:09:07,200 --> 00:09:11,400 they have to come out here and say the right-wing Washington 162 00:09:11,400 --> 00:09:14,000 Examiner. Why can't they just say, the 163 00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:17,400 Washington examiner, would they call the Huffington Post? 164 00:09:17,400 --> 00:09:19,700 The left-wing host Huffington Post. 165 00:09:19,700 --> 00:09:22,800 When they've done great coverage on UFOs, on Huffington, Post, 166 00:09:23,900 --> 00:09:27,800 regardless of how you feel about the political bent of Arianna 167 00:09:27,800 --> 00:09:30,300 Huffington. There's been some, what I would 168 00:09:30,300 --> 00:09:33,000 consider really excellent reporting. 169 00:09:34,100 --> 00:09:36,500 I'm having a moment. I can't think of the fellows 170 00:09:36,500 --> 00:09:38,400 name. He's really famous writer on 171 00:09:38,400 --> 00:09:40,000 UFOs. That is done. 172 00:09:40,000 --> 00:09:42,700 Excellent. Work published on The Huffington 173 00:09:42,700 --> 00:09:44,700 Post. Post is contributing to what we 174 00:09:44,700 --> 00:09:49,100 know the body of work about the UFO phenomena and quite frankly 175 00:09:49,600 --> 00:09:52,300 his politics aren't that important to me as long as he's 176 00:09:52,300 --> 00:09:56,300 approaching this with an open mind which which on the HuffPost 177 00:09:56,300 --> 00:09:58,700 it seemed like it was most articles that I read. 178 00:09:59,200 --> 00:10:01,700 And now with this here situation, with the Washington 179 00:10:01,700 --> 00:10:05,400 examiner, what does it matter? What the political bent of his 180 00:10:05,400 --> 00:10:10,200 paper is as long as this Author. This journalist is being given 181 00:10:10,200 --> 00:10:14,600 to chance to report on the UFO phenomena and a non-judgmental 182 00:10:16,200 --> 00:10:19,400 logical way. But this is a sort of bias that 183 00:10:19,400 --> 00:10:23,700 we have to deal with every single day with the media and 184 00:10:23,700 --> 00:10:28,500 the media today is left-wing media to that end Tucker had on 185 00:10:28,500 --> 00:10:31,500 Tom Rogan from the right-wing Washington examiner to talk 186 00:10:31,500 --> 00:10:34,400 about a report. He wrote two weeks ago that has 187 00:10:34,400 --> 00:10:38,000 gained, no traction among respected. 188 00:10:38,600 --> 00:10:40,600 News outlets. No traction. 189 00:10:42,100 --> 00:10:45,100 Wow, this author here really seems to be opinionated. 190 00:10:45,100 --> 00:10:49,700 I mean this this story has been all over the Internet and quite 191 00:10:49,700 --> 00:10:52,600 frankly, it's been on quite a few news that less that I 192 00:10:54,000 --> 00:11:00,200 Respect, but you can kind of see this liberal Coastal mindset. 193 00:11:00,600 --> 00:11:04,300 If you're not part of our club, then you don't know anything. 194 00:11:05,600 --> 00:11:07,400 Quite frankly, we know that these are some of the dumbest 195 00:11:07,400 --> 00:11:12,600 people on the planet. But they persist Rogue and begin 196 00:11:12,600 --> 00:11:16,100 by pointing out himself that pointing that out himself in a 197 00:11:16,108 --> 00:11:17,400 way. Thanks for covering this. 198 00:11:17,400 --> 00:11:20,600 Because not enough journalist, I think do he told Tucker? 199 00:11:21,800 --> 00:11:25,900 He then summed up his alleged, the this alleged incident for 200 00:11:25,900 --> 00:11:31,100 Tucker, the late 2019 incident, essentially evolved a US, 201 00:11:31,100 --> 00:11:35,800 carrier strike group, as with the incident of 2004 and 15, 202 00:11:36,200 --> 00:11:38,600 doing its work UPS on pre-deployment. 203 00:11:38,600 --> 00:11:40,700 Preparing to go. Head and do the missions that 204 00:11:40,700 --> 00:11:42,700 the Navy. The Navy are assigned Reagan 205 00:11:42,700 --> 00:11:47,800 said and the pilots are flying off the coast of the Atlantic 206 00:11:47,800 --> 00:11:51,300 Seaboard and seeing essentially black triangle, white sort of 207 00:11:51,300 --> 00:11:53,100 indicator lights on their peripheral tips. 208 00:11:53,100 --> 00:11:57,400 Coming out of the water way very quickly and then accelerating an 209 00:11:57,400 --> 00:12:01,400 extremely high speed at about a 90-degree angle. 210 00:12:01,700 --> 00:12:04,700 And one of the pilots took a photo, very good photo. 211 00:12:04,700 --> 00:12:07,700 I'm told by multiple sources on his iPhone. 212 00:12:08,400 --> 00:12:12,000 It came out of the Her attacker said there had been over there, 213 00:12:12,000 --> 00:12:14,400 have been over the years, a number of reports of 214 00:12:14,400 --> 00:12:18,500 unidentified underwater vehicles, moving in the ways 215 00:12:18,500 --> 00:12:20,800 that don't make any sense at all. 216 00:12:21,000 --> 00:12:22,400 Tell us what, you know about that. 217 00:12:22,900 --> 00:12:24,500 Okay? First off, if I'm looking at a 218 00:12:24,508 --> 00:12:29,200 giant black triangle, hovering there, by the water, the fact 219 00:12:29,200 --> 00:12:32,100 that it could have been in the water just before that doesn't 220 00:12:32,100 --> 00:12:34,200 seem like that big of a deal if I'm already. 221 00:12:34,200 --> 00:12:36,900 Okay. With the notion that I'm seeing 222 00:12:36,900 --> 00:12:40,400 flying black triangles the That those triangles could have been 223 00:12:40,400 --> 00:12:44,300 underwater, you know, moving back and forth between the water 224 00:12:44,300 --> 00:12:46,100 and the sky and the land or whatever. 225 00:12:47,500 --> 00:12:49,600 It's not really a stretch for me Rogue. 226 00:12:49,600 --> 00:12:51,700 And then told Tucker that, the reason the Navy doesn't 227 00:12:51,700 --> 00:12:55,300 publicize this stuff is because they don't want either China or 228 00:12:55,300 --> 00:12:57,100 Russia. In particular to figure out what 229 00:12:57,100 --> 00:13:00,700 these vehicles are figure out how they do what they do. 230 00:13:02,200 --> 00:13:05,400 All right, this is to me, such a load of crap. 231 00:13:06,200 --> 00:13:08,400 I mean the fact is China and Russia. 232 00:13:08,700 --> 00:13:12,200 Do have enough of advanced detection systems that certainly 233 00:13:12,200 --> 00:13:13,900 they already know these things exist. 234 00:13:17,000 --> 00:13:19,900 If they don't, if the Navy doesn't want people to know, 235 00:13:19,900 --> 00:13:21,700 they exist. Just like I've said all along in 236 00:13:21,700 --> 00:13:25,100 my opinion, at least they don't want us to know. 237 00:13:25,200 --> 00:13:28,300 They don't want the average person to know because knowledge 238 00:13:28,300 --> 00:13:31,300 is power and they want you power less. 239 00:13:32,100 --> 00:13:34,200 They've proven this with the covid scam. 240 00:13:34,200 --> 00:13:40,000 Keep you locking your houses. Don't go to the store, wear a 241 00:13:40,008 --> 00:13:42,200 mask. Oh, and by the way, bacterial 242 00:13:42,200 --> 00:13:46,100 pneumonias way up. They're all about, pushing the 243 00:13:46,100 --> 00:13:48,900 lie and keeping knowledge out of your hands. 244 00:13:50,000 --> 00:13:51,900 Too bad from couldn't figure that out. 245 00:13:53,000 --> 00:13:56,300 But now we're supposed to believe they're protecting us by 246 00:13:56,300 --> 00:13:59,500 keeping us in the dark. I'll pass on that. 247 00:14:01,300 --> 00:14:03,200 It continues. They maneuver in ways that would 248 00:14:03,200 --> 00:14:06,500 essentially render a submarine or an aircraft carrier, any 249 00:14:07,200 --> 00:14:10,900 quite frankly, military worship, extremely vulnerable to attack, 250 00:14:11,000 --> 00:14:14,300 Rogue and told Tucker. This is some special stuff. 251 00:14:14,800 --> 00:14:17,900 Whatever it is, will a bullet. Doesn't travel hundreds of knots 252 00:14:17,900 --> 00:14:20,700 an hour underwater for long. I mean, I don't think any 253 00:14:20,700 --> 00:14:24,600 human-made object ever has. We've never imagined something 254 00:14:24,600 --> 00:14:27,700 like that, Tucker, gasp gaped though. 255 00:14:27,700 --> 00:14:30,200 The genre of Science Fiction might disagree with that. 256 00:14:30,400 --> 00:14:32,400 It went rogue and then wrapped up his Spiel. 257 00:14:33,000 --> 00:14:36,600 What these things can do in are under water in space, at least 258 00:14:36,600 --> 00:14:40,200 in lunar, orbit are Beyond any capability that we can identify 259 00:14:40,500 --> 00:14:44,400 with an earth Nation. Either in platform, something 260 00:14:44,400 --> 00:14:47,100 that the military is showing or is in development. 261 00:14:47,200 --> 00:14:52,100 He told Carlson or as ever been conceived of Tucker, can tuck a 262 00:14:52,108 --> 00:14:53,700 replied? I mean, let's be honest. 263 00:14:53,700 --> 00:14:59,200 This this is, this is really out of the room earlier this year, 264 00:14:59,200 --> 00:15:01,900 Fox News lawyers, Argue before a judge that are cooked that 265 00:15:01,900 --> 00:15:05,100 Tucker Carlson is not a credible source of news, and the judge 266 00:15:05,100 --> 00:15:08,300 agrees saying that any reasonable viewer would not take 267 00:15:08,300 --> 00:15:11,600 him. Seriously, you can watch that 268 00:15:11,600 --> 00:15:17,000 quoted portion. On Tucker Carlson night on Fox 269 00:15:17,000 --> 00:15:19,500 News in the video embedded by the top news article. 270 00:15:19,500 --> 00:15:21,900 And I don't know nothing about that that must involve some sort 271 00:15:21,900 --> 00:15:24,900 of lawsuit with fox or something, but it's funny how 272 00:15:24,900 --> 00:15:28,100 this person that wrote this article was so worried about 273 00:15:28,100 --> 00:15:30,700 having their feelings hurt or the possibility of UFOs had they 274 00:15:30,700 --> 00:15:32,800 had to personally insult Tucker Carlson. 275 00:15:33,700 --> 00:15:36,200 You can draw some different conclusions from this article. 276 00:15:36,900 --> 00:15:39,400 Certainly, the one picture has been circulating. 277 00:15:39,400 --> 00:15:42,600 I don't know why the triangle photos not out there more often. 278 00:15:43,900 --> 00:15:46,700 Either we can look at this and say, well someone somewhere is 279 00:15:46,700 --> 00:15:49,300 trying to leak this stuff and maybe they're afraid that 280 00:15:49,300 --> 00:15:51,000 repercussions. And that's why we haven't seen 281 00:15:51,000 --> 00:15:54,700 that last photo or possibly we could look at what I think might 282 00:15:54,700 --> 00:15:57,100 be a real possibility. That is somewhere somewhere. 283 00:15:57,100 --> 00:16:00,100 Someone is trying to monetize this situation. 284 00:16:00,700 --> 00:16:04,800 They've posted this UFO Cube to let us know that. 285 00:16:04,800 --> 00:16:06,800 Hey, they've got the goods and if you want to see the really 286 00:16:06,800 --> 00:16:08,900 cool triangle pick is going to cost a little money. 287 00:16:09,400 --> 00:16:11,900 Now, maybe there's some behind-the-scenes negotiations. 288 00:16:11,900 --> 00:16:13,400 Going on. I don't know. 289 00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:16,900 But I think that's what the disclosure comes to in this day 290 00:16:16,900 --> 00:16:18,200 and age. You have the personal disclosure 291 00:16:18,200 --> 00:16:20,600 that people have when they take pictures on their cell phones, 292 00:16:20,800 --> 00:16:23,100 and it post them online or they send it to someone like me. 293 00:16:23,100 --> 00:16:24,600 And we can all share them as lot of fun. 294 00:16:25,300 --> 00:16:28,100 But then you have the monetize disclosure like we've seen as 295 00:16:28,100 --> 00:16:34,700 what's happened with the the three videos we talked about so 296 00:16:34,700 --> 00:16:39,600 much, the Fleur, go fast and and Tic-Tac, I mean where are you 297 00:16:39,600 --> 00:16:42,000 end up with a whole industry that goes up around at those 298 00:16:42,000 --> 00:16:45,300 videos you can hardly watch it. Discovery Channel UFO show now, 299 00:16:45,300 --> 00:16:48,500 or read an article online, where those videos aren't at least 300 00:16:48,500 --> 00:16:53,000 referenced. If not the We're not featured 301 00:16:54,200 --> 00:16:56,300 and I wonder if that's not what's about to happen here. 302 00:16:56,400 --> 00:17:00,000 Secondly, although I like the wrapping law stuff and it's a, 303 00:17:00,800 --> 00:17:04,599 not a badly written article. I find it a little disheartening 304 00:17:04,599 --> 00:17:07,599 that they have to go out of their way to kind of poo poo, 305 00:17:07,599 --> 00:17:12,599 the whole UFO thing, accuse the Washington Times it being right 306 00:17:12,599 --> 00:17:15,300 wing, is it that something terrible when someone disagrees 307 00:17:15,300 --> 00:17:18,800 with you and then more or less trash talk? 308 00:17:19,900 --> 00:17:22,400 Trash truck, Tucker Carlson is oh, he's a no nothing. 309 00:17:22,599 --> 00:17:25,599 You see how they go after the witness a straw man argument, 310 00:17:25,800 --> 00:17:29,300 you can't attack the evidence. So you have to attack the people 311 00:17:29,300 --> 00:17:31,800 that bring you the evidence and that's clearly what happened to 312 00:17:31,808 --> 00:17:35,100 this article. They are attacking the 313 00:17:35,100 --> 00:17:38,100 Washington Times they're attacking Tucker Carlson. 314 00:17:38,700 --> 00:17:42,100 The really couldn't say too much about the reporter but they're 315 00:17:42,100 --> 00:17:45,100 trying to turn your head away from this clear photographic 316 00:17:45,100 --> 00:17:49,200 evidence although we don't see it here we're trying to turn 317 00:17:49,200 --> 00:17:51,400 your head. Away from evidence, that was 318 00:17:51,400 --> 00:17:55,600 reported by the copilot of F-18 Hornet, fighter piled, our you 319 00:17:55,600 --> 00:18:00,200 know, our military Heroes. And they're trying to distract 320 00:18:00,200 --> 00:18:02,900 you from what clearly is something real to get you 321 00:18:02,900 --> 00:18:04,800 distracted. Looking over somewhere else. 322 00:18:05,000 --> 00:18:07,500 Well this person is not like you so you can't like them. 323 00:18:08,100 --> 00:18:11,500 This person is not the same political persuasion as you so 324 00:18:11,500 --> 00:18:16,300 you can't trust what they say. That's a scary thought. 325 00:18:19,100 --> 00:18:20,800 I think this is going to be an article. 326 00:18:20,800 --> 00:18:24,600 This I think this is going to be a sighting rather an incident. 327 00:18:24,600 --> 00:18:29,100 This triangle UFO. Once the picture is released 328 00:18:29,400 --> 00:18:32,200 sold rented out. Whatever once that picture comes 329 00:18:32,200 --> 00:18:35,700 out and we have a couple co-pilots faces to go along with 330 00:18:35,700 --> 00:18:37,800 it. I think that this thing is going 331 00:18:37,800 --> 00:18:40,600 to really take off now. People are still talking about 332 00:18:40,600 --> 00:18:44,000 Trump releasing UFO information disclosure, I don't believe it 333 00:18:44,000 --> 00:18:46,600 for a second. I think at this point I'm very 334 00:18:46,600 --> 00:18:48,800 disappointed in the guy. You did a lot of good. 335 00:18:48,900 --> 00:18:51,300 Things. But I feel like he has just been 336 00:18:51,800 --> 00:18:54,900 neutered somehow to where he's helpless you know whatever 337 00:18:54,900 --> 00:18:58,000 they've got on him, Marie's family, or whatever, kind of 338 00:18:58,000 --> 00:18:59,700 threats. He's endured or maybe just a 339 00:18:59,708 --> 00:19:02,400 psychological warfare hasn't worn him down. 340 00:19:04,400 --> 00:19:08,400 It would have been nice to have seen a pardon for Julian Assange 341 00:19:08,400 --> 00:19:10,700 or Snowden, maybe get some of this stuff out. 342 00:19:10,700 --> 00:19:13,100 I'm not hopeful. It would have been nice to see 343 00:19:13,100 --> 00:19:15,800 him. Just say, you know what, screw 344 00:19:15,800 --> 00:19:21,400 the Deep State release, the Kraken release, some of the 65 345 00:19:21,400 --> 00:19:24,700 70 year old stuff anyway, it would have been nice. 346 00:19:26,100 --> 00:19:29,500 Quite frankly, I'm not hopeful but what we can do is we can 347 00:19:29,500 --> 00:19:31,700 make up our own minds. We can continue reading them 348 00:19:31,700 --> 00:19:34,800 information that we find, we can continue exchanging pictures in 349 00:19:34,800 --> 00:19:39,700 the counts and stories online because your experience with the 350 00:19:39,700 --> 00:19:44,500 UFO sighting or encounter is just as real as that of a Navy 351 00:19:44,500 --> 00:19:46,900 pilot. Important thing is that you 352 00:19:46,900 --> 00:19:52,200 document it You get the facts down and then you let us know 353 00:19:52,200 --> 00:19:55,000 about it and we can share about it and we can decide amongst 354 00:19:55,000 --> 00:19:58,600 ourselves what to believe and why we believe it. 355 00:19:59,800 --> 00:20:02,700 Until next time, this is UFO warning over and out.