Hello and welcome to the program.
You have a warning, today's topic, Uso triangle, that's
correct, Uso triangle, otherwise known as underwater submersible
object triangle now this is the same Uso / UFO.
We've been talking about off and on for a little bit and there's
a couple different angles to destroy that.
I find very interesting. It's the one that That was
supposedly photographed. And I believe 2018 by the F-18
fighter pilot on their iPhone. Now, while we do have a picture
of what they're calling the cube UFO, which is, I don't know, I
would describe it more as a jagged Cube have yet to see an
actual photograph of this triangle shaped UFO with the
circular lights on each corner. And that seems a little weird to
me. Why would they just release both
photos? I found this article on the
rap.com the rap.com and I have a link to it on the website UFO
morning.com. And basically what we're looking
at here, is an interview at Tucker Carlson recently did
concerning this Uso and the article written about it and
some of the dialogue from that interview.
Now, you can go onto the website and you can link on there and
read it yourself. Where you can actually watch
this short interview that Tucker Carlson did and Tucker Carlson.
It does do a lot of UFO stuff. The problem that I have with
this, it looks like from the video thumb shot that they're
doing. They're doing what they seem to
be doing with every single UFO. Story that comes out today.
There they are. They're mixing and matching with
the UFO videos from the Nimitz and their Roosevelt from 2004.
And what the 2015 incidents, those this cockpit fighter
videos that we've seen so many times was three.
Of them, the Fleer, the go fast and the Tic Tac videos.
I think. You can hardly watch anything
online on TV or read about it and news article without having
the snapshot of those videos as part of the article.
And I think that while those, that is an important story, I
think that it doesn't do service to another UFO story to just
throw the stuff in as filler. It's more of this cut and paste
journalism that we are subjected to on a day in day out basis.
Now, the story from the wrap, says Tucker Carlson talks
underwater UFOs, quote. We've never imagined something
like that and it says, let's be honest.
This is, this is really out of the realm Tucker gushed on his
show Tuesday night. Well, they're talking about the
triangle video but they're showing the video from 2015,
2005, whatever. So that's, that's the mixing and
matching. I'm talking about what Tucker
really should. Talking about is.
Hey, where is the actual picture of the triangle video?
Now we've seen what's supposed to be the picture of the cube
video? Show us the triangle.
This almost seems like another one of those UFO studies
stories, where people in the military, insiders, or possibly,
even deep State intelligence individuals are slow, leaking
this stuff. It's the, it's the coffee drip
method of releasing information where they release just enough
to get your attention. But not enough to really inform
you and that's what's happening here.
We're being told that somebody somewhere has pictures of this
stuff. Well, what are they waiting for?
Are they waiting for a substantive offer for the
pictures from Tom DeLonge? I, I fully expect to see the
actual picture of this thing. Released, at any time with the
TSA water, mark stamped all over it.
That's what I expect. Secondly, maybe I'm behind the
times, but it seems a little bit weird that the Cedar on the
fa-18 would be pulling out his cell phone to take pictures of
stuff. I didn't even think those guys
would be allowed to take a cell phone with them on a flight that
seems strange, but I guess maybe that's how it's done.
Now, now, the article begins is says, as he so often, does
Tucker Carlson talked about aliens and UFOs again, Tuesday
night at this article came out, December 15th.
So, just a couple days ago, it says, but this time, there's a
new wrinkle these UFOs fly. Not just in the air.
But also underwater. Well, if you've been following
the UFO phenomena, for any length of time, you know, that
this is certainly not a new. Wrinkle people have been talking
about you SOS for decades, if not longer.
Well, Columbus, supposedly saw u.s. owes on his first voyage to
America. It says your quote, a new report
from American intelligence confirms something that's been
rumored for a while late last year at US Navy.
The fa-18 fighter jet took a very clear photograph on a
personal phone of a triangle-shaped unidentified
aerial phenomena. Phenomena Tucker said excitedly,
I have to interject here a little bit.
I'm a little disappointed with Tucker.
You know, he got on television need to complain about Sydney
Powell, not coming up with the evidence that he needed to
believe that there was corruption and then lost the
election. I mean, you ought to be able to
watch the videos on Election night.
See that ballots were being stuffed.
Pretty clear. The Tucker was all over her
about that but what I don't see is him questioning who these
so-called intelligence sources are, you know, why aren't we
allowed to have a clear picture of who exactly reported this
stuff, because we shouldn't just make that shouldn't just make
the assumption that there's not disinformation involved when it
comes to UFO reports. The first thing that we have to
do when we get one of these UFO reports as we have to decide
whether it's mostly information or mostly disinformation.
How do we do that? Well, the first step is
deciding, what the source is, is a source believable.
Or do we even know the source is and based on what we know about
the source, then we can make some inferences about how much
will believe of the store, but Tucker doesn't even bother to do
that. Apparently.
And then it says, took a very clear photograph.
Well, they're making a detailed description of evidence.
But as yet, I have not seen the evidence.
I've asked people to send me pictures of this thing or links
if they've seen it. I haven't gotten any response so
far. I've searched all over the
Internet and I can't find a picture.
I found some artist rendering I can do, I can do one of those
myself. I might not be that good of a
rendering but I mean, come on, someone sit down and draw a
picture on Adobe. So right there is two big
problems. I find is very first paragraph.
We don't know who the source is and we having to see we haven't
even seen the evidence. So for a guy who was really
trash talk and somebody who's, you know, pointing out election
fraud, just a couple weeks ago, doesn't seem to have the same
standard when it comes to fo assertions goes on a, says that
vehicle whatever it was appeared to be operating without
propulsion system. That generated no visible
exhaust hard to see how that can happen.
The setting likely places. The UFO near a u.s.
nuclear-powered. Aircraft carrier, that shouldn't
be surprising because of a string of UFO sightings have
involved nuclear reactors and Warheads there again.
How do we know where it happened?
If we hide the picture and the metadata behind a picture?
Then yes, we could tell you probably Ali where it happened
at once. Again sources are not being
revealed the actual evidence, they're making a clear
description of the evidence and representing it, as fact.
I don't know if Tucker seen his pictures or night.
Is this a has? He acts like he has, I haven't
seen him. They don't appear to be publicly
available. This is following the same
trajectory as the rest of the to the academy stars.
Revelations that came out a couple years ago and my opinion
that is not the way to do disclosure goes on here.
It says, but Tucker isn't just here for the rigor UFOs, he
wanted to talk about the underwater UFOs, which behave in
ways that science can explain. Well, I can assure the author
that normal UFOs. Also, do not do not act in ways
that scientists can explain. And we're starting to see that
these phenomena Have one commonality and that is they do
not have to obey the laws of physics as we know them to that
end. Tucker had on Tom Rogan from the
right wing. I'm not sure why they have to
call the Washington examiner. Right wing.
I think that's owned by the Moonies, but they do put some
good stuff out, right wing Washington, examiner to talk
about a report he wrote. Now, this is more tribalism that
you see in the journalism world. It's very disappointing, but
they have to come out here and say the right-wing Washington
Examiner. Why can't they just say, the
Washington examiner, would they call the Huffington Post?
The left-wing host Huffington Post.
When they've done great coverage on UFOs, on Huffington, Post,
regardless of how you feel about the political bent of Arianna
Huffington. There's been some, what I would
consider really excellent reporting.
I'm having a moment. I can't think of the fellows
name. He's really famous writer on
UFOs. That is done.
Excellent. Work published on The Huffington
Post. Post is contributing to what we
know the body of work about the UFO phenomena and quite frankly
his politics aren't that important to me as long as he's
approaching this with an open mind which which on the HuffPost
it seemed like it was most articles that I read.
And now with this here situation, with the Washington
examiner, what does it matter? What the political bent of his
paper is as long as this Author. This journalist is being given
to chance to report on the UFO phenomena and a non-judgmental
logical way. But this is a sort of bias that
we have to deal with every single day with the media and
the media today is left-wing media to that end Tucker had on
Tom Rogan from the right-wing Washington examiner to talk
about a report. He wrote two weeks ago that has
gained, no traction among respected.
News outlets. No traction.
Wow, this author here really seems to be opinionated.
I mean this this story has been all over the Internet and quite
frankly, it's been on quite a few news that less that I
Respect, but you can kind of see this liberal Coastal mindset.
If you're not part of our club, then you don't know anything.
Quite frankly, we know that these are some of the dumbest
people on the planet. But they persist Rogue and begin
by pointing out himself that pointing that out himself in a
way. Thanks for covering this.
Because not enough journalist, I think do he told Tucker?
He then summed up his alleged, the this alleged incident for
Tucker, the late 2019 incident, essentially evolved a US,
carrier strike group, as with the incident of 2004 and 15,
doing its work UPS on pre-deployment.
Preparing to go. Head and do the missions that
the Navy. The Navy are assigned Reagan
said and the pilots are flying off the coast of the Atlantic
Seaboard and seeing essentially black triangle, white sort of
indicator lights on their peripheral tips.
Coming out of the water way very quickly and then accelerating an
extremely high speed at about a 90-degree angle.
And one of the pilots took a photo, very good photo.
I'm told by multiple sources on his iPhone.
It came out of the Her attacker said there had been over there,
have been over the years, a number of reports of
unidentified underwater vehicles, moving in the ways
that don't make any sense at all.
Tell us what, you know about that.
Okay? First off, if I'm looking at a
giant black triangle, hovering there, by the water, the fact
that it could have been in the water just before that doesn't
seem like that big of a deal if I'm already.
Okay. With the notion that I'm seeing
flying black triangles the That those triangles could have been
underwater, you know, moving back and forth between the water
and the sky and the land or whatever.
It's not really a stretch for me Rogue.
And then told Tucker that, the reason the Navy doesn't
publicize this stuff is because they don't want either China or
Russia. In particular to figure out what
these vehicles are figure out how they do what they do.
All right, this is to me, such a load of crap.
I mean the fact is China and Russia.
Do have enough of advanced detection systems that certainly
they already know these things exist.
If they don't, if the Navy doesn't want people to know,
they exist. Just like I've said all along in
my opinion, at least they don't want us to know.
They don't want the average person to know because knowledge
is power and they want you power less.
They've proven this with the covid scam.
Keep you locking your houses. Don't go to the store, wear a
mask. Oh, and by the way, bacterial
pneumonias way up. They're all about, pushing the
lie and keeping knowledge out of your hands.
Too bad from couldn't figure that out.
But now we're supposed to believe they're protecting us by
keeping us in the dark. I'll pass on that.
It continues. They maneuver in ways that would
essentially render a submarine or an aircraft carrier, any
quite frankly, military worship, extremely vulnerable to attack,
Rogue and told Tucker. This is some special stuff.
Whatever it is, will a bullet. Doesn't travel hundreds of knots
an hour underwater for long. I mean, I don't think any
human-made object ever has. We've never imagined something
like that, Tucker, gasp gaped though.
The genre of Science Fiction might disagree with that.
It went rogue and then wrapped up his Spiel.
What these things can do in are under water in space, at least
in lunar, orbit are Beyond any capability that we can identify
with an earth Nation. Either in platform, something
that the military is showing or is in development.
He told Carlson or as ever been conceived of Tucker, can tuck a
replied? I mean, let's be honest.
This this is, this is really out of the room earlier this year,
Fox News lawyers, Argue before a judge that are cooked that
Tucker Carlson is not a credible source of news, and the judge
agrees saying that any reasonable viewer would not take
him. Seriously, you can watch that
quoted portion. On Tucker Carlson night on Fox
News in the video embedded by the top news article.
And I don't know nothing about that that must involve some sort
of lawsuit with fox or something, but it's funny how
this person that wrote this article was so worried about
having their feelings hurt or the possibility of UFOs had they
had to personally insult Tucker Carlson.
You can draw some different conclusions from this article.
Certainly, the one picture has been circulating.
I don't know why the triangle photos not out there more often.
Either we can look at this and say, well someone somewhere is
trying to leak this stuff and maybe they're afraid that
repercussions. And that's why we haven't seen
that last photo or possibly we could look at what I think might
be a real possibility. That is somewhere somewhere.
Someone is trying to monetize this situation.
They've posted this UFO Cube to let us know that.
Hey, they've got the goods and if you want to see the really
cool triangle pick is going to cost a little money.
Now, maybe there's some behind-the-scenes negotiations.
Going on. I don't know.
But I think that's what the disclosure comes to in this day
and age. You have the personal disclosure
that people have when they take pictures on their cell phones,
and it post them online or they send it to someone like me.
And we can all share them as lot of fun.
But then you have the monetize disclosure like we've seen as
what's happened with the the three videos we talked about so
much, the Fleur, go fast and and Tic-Tac, I mean where are you
end up with a whole industry that goes up around at those
videos you can hardly watch it. Discovery Channel UFO show now,
or read an article online, where those videos aren't at least
referenced. If not the We're not featured
and I wonder if that's not what's about to happen here.
Secondly, although I like the wrapping law stuff and it's a,
not a badly written article. I find it a little disheartening
that they have to go out of their way to kind of poo poo,
the whole UFO thing, accuse the Washington Times it being right
wing, is it that something terrible when someone disagrees
with you and then more or less trash talk?
Trash truck, Tucker Carlson is oh, he's a no nothing.
You see how they go after the witness a straw man argument,
you can't attack the evidence. So you have to attack the people
that bring you the evidence and that's clearly what happened to
this article. They are attacking the
Washington Times they're attacking Tucker Carlson.
The really couldn't say too much about the reporter but they're
trying to turn your head away from this clear photographic
evidence although we don't see it here we're trying to turn
your head. Away from evidence, that was
reported by the copilot of F-18 Hornet, fighter piled, our you
know, our military Heroes. And they're trying to distract
you from what clearly is something real to get you
distracted. Looking over somewhere else.
Well this person is not like you so you can't like them.
This person is not the same political persuasion as you so
you can't trust what they say. That's a scary thought.
I think this is going to be an article.
This I think this is going to be a sighting rather an incident.
This triangle UFO. Once the picture is released
sold rented out. Whatever once that picture comes
out and we have a couple co-pilots faces to go along with
it. I think that this thing is going
to really take off now. People are still talking about
Trump releasing UFO information disclosure, I don't believe it
for a second. I think at this point I'm very
disappointed in the guy. You did a lot of good.
Things. But I feel like he has just been
neutered somehow to where he's helpless you know whatever
they've got on him, Marie's family, or whatever, kind of
threats. He's endured or maybe just a
psychological warfare hasn't worn him down.
It would have been nice to have seen a pardon for Julian Assange
or Snowden, maybe get some of this stuff out.
I'm not hopeful. It would have been nice to see
him. Just say, you know what, screw
the Deep State release, the Kraken release, some of the 65
70 year old stuff anyway, it would have been nice.
Quite frankly, I'm not hopeful but what we can do is we can
make up our own minds. We can continue reading them
information that we find, we can continue exchanging pictures in
the counts and stories online because your experience with the
UFO sighting or encounter is just as real as that of a Navy
pilot. Important thing is that you
document it You get the facts down and then you let us know
about it and we can share about it and we can decide amongst
ourselves what to believe and why we believe it.
Until next time, this is UFO warning over and out.