Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're talking about John Ratcliffe UFOs are
that's correct, John Ratcliffe UFOs are.
Now what we're talking about is the fact that John Ratcliffe is
being rumoured to be the next head of the CIA.
If we could be so lucky, this might be the guy to give us at
least some tiny bit of disclosure.
This article comes to us from citynews.com.
It says former US lawmaker John Ratcliffe is a top name being
touted for the central agency, Central Intelligence Agency or
the CIA director role under the incoming Trump administration.
Several sources have told our US partner CBS Ratcliffe was the
national intelligence director under Trump during his first
term in office. Earlier, Mike Pompeo so was
floated as a contender to lead the Defense Department.
Meanwhile, President Donald Trump will meet Joe Biden in the
Oval Office on Wednesday, the White House says, in their first
encounter since the election. I do believe that Pompeo, along
with Nikki Haley, are off the list.
Trump is preparing for his return to office at his Florida
State and Mar A Lago says environmental lawyer and vaccine
skeptic Robert F Kennedy Junior is on the short list to become
Trump's health secretary, sources tell the BBC partner
CBS. Elsewhere, Republicans are
narrowly short of a majority in the House of Representatives as
counting continues. The Republicans have already won
back control. The Senate House win would give
them significant power to enact Donald Trump's agenda.
This could be a win win win. Talking about disclosure, John
Ratcliffe, in case you aren't familiar with this guy, is a, I
think a pretty stand up guy really.
He's made comments about UFOs in the past that really give me a
lot of hope. Now, John Ratcliffe is a
prominent American politician. He's an attorney and he's the
former director of National intelligence and he's garnered a
significant attention for his views on transparency and
intelligence matters. He served as DNI from 2020-2021.
He just had a short stint, but it was promising.
Ratcliffe oversaw the US intelligence community and
played a notable role in bringing more attention to the
topic of unidentified aerial phenomena, or UFOs.
His tenure has been marked by a commitment to transparency.
That's what I like about this guy.
Is highlighted by the release of previously classified
information about UFOs to inform the public and Congress about
potential national security concerns.
Now I reposted this from Truth poll.
At Truth Poll X it says some interesting news.
One of the biggest proponents of UFO transparency, former
Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, is
now being considered for the role of CIA chief.
Here's him dropping some absolute UFO truth bombs on
unsuspecting news anchors. And I tell you, you watch
expressions on these news anchors faces, they really are
kind of having the world rock. We'll listen to this outtake
right here. Number of sightings, they're far
greater than have been publicly disclosed before.
I think there's been some leaking that there may be as
many as a hundred. I'm not going to dispute that
number. But what's more important, Trey,
is that the number of sightings and recordings that have been
picked up by what we call multiple sensors, that is visual
radar, ISR satellite. And when you have multiple
sensors under conditions where we see Uaps, it explains away a
lot of the things like visual disturbances or things like
that. When it when it comes to
national security, ego can't be involved.
If there's something out there that's bigger or faster and
stronger, we've really got to answer that question.
And, and so having a discussion about it is going to be a good
thing. Frankly, there are a lot more
sightings than have been made public.
Some of those have been declassified.
When we talk about sightings, we're talking about objects that
have been seen by Navy or Air Force pilots or have been picked
up by satellite imagery that frankly engage in actions that
are difficult to explain. That movements that that are
hard to replicate, that we don't have the technology for, or
traveling at speeds that, you know, exceed the sound barrier
without a Sonic boom. So in short, things that we are
observing that are difficult to explain.
And so, you know, there's actually quite a few of those.
And I think that that information is being gathered
and will will be put out in a way that the American people can
see. We always, when we when we see
these things, Maria, we always look for a plausible
explanation. You know, weather can cause
disturbances, visual disturbances.
Sometimes we wonder whether or not our adversaries have
technologies that are a little bit further down the road than
we thought or that we realized. But there are instances where we
don't have good explanations for some of the things that we've
seen. And, you know, when that
information becomes declassified, I'll be able to
talk a little bit more about that.
Obviously, there's a there's a lot of documentation out there
of different things that I think the American people deserve to
know about. Yeah.
We need to restore confidence in our institutions that I think
transparency and some truth telling, treating us like adults
and citizens who are in charge of our government as opposed to
servants. Well, that's true work.
So John, treat us like an adult here.
You've seen the Intel. It's January 15th in the year
2023. Are aliens real?
Well, I can't talk to you about, you know, any potential alien
life, so I'll just leave it at that There we go.
That's what does that answer say.
I I don't know. I don't know.
You'll notice he says I can't talk to you.
It's almost when he's saying that he's kind of stuttering.
It's like maybe he's saying, listen, if this stuff had been
declassified, I could talk to you.
Another thing about that video, if you get a chance to watch it
over at my Twitter site, Warning sub UFO.
It's at warning sub UFO. You can see the expression on
that the news lady's face, Maria Bartiromono, I think is her
name. Anyway, she's the camera kind of
zooms in on her and she's blinking rapidly and more
rapidly Is he talks more about this stuff.
Really, really interesting things going on there.
I have to ask myself, maybe Trump getting arrested, still
facing decades in prison, Maybe this is enough for him to have a
wake up call and to realize that the deep state really doesn't
like him. I've said for a long time that
Trump is like my Husky. He thinks that everybody loves
him. But what he doesn't realize is
that some people hate dogs and especially hate Huskies.
And so I think he needs to understand that this big, happy,
friendly, sometimes obnoxious personality, it doesn't fit with
the deep state. And so he better get the right
people in there until you get done what he wants to do,
especially with this whole thing with disclosure, the releasing
the truth, you know, as it says in in the good book, the truth
will set you free. Well, this UFO truth will set a
lot of people free as well, even if they don't release the plans
for the craft. Just admitting that, hey, our
Earth is being invaded by something, whether it's
interdimensional, extra dimensional, what you want to
call it, or from another planet somewhere by by just stepping up
and saying, well, something's happening here that we can't
control. The people that can't deal with
it won't be able to deal with it.
But the rest of us, I think will be reassured by a tiny bit of
honesty from our government. Let's go ahead and look at this
next article. Now, there's a bit of an aside
here. This article from cnbc.com says
Trump says Haley, Pompeo will not join second administration.
A lot of people view Haley and Pompeo as a couple of deep state
critters. There was that really strange
news conference during COVID when Trump was up there to
Pompeo. And I think Fauci and a couple
others would be bricks. And Pompeo made a comment about
it being a simulation. And Trump said, I think
something to the effect of, well, I wish you would have told
me, just made me wonder what in the world is going on there.
Also lots of rumors about Pompeo wanting to, you know, make sure
that Julius Assange was locked up for the rest of his life.
So this is, this is good that Trump has kept these two people
out. I think personally, maybe I'm
wrong, but that's just my opinion. president-elect Donald
Trump said on Saturday that former Republican presidential
contender Nikki Haley and former Secretary of State mock Mike
Pompeo will not be asked to join his administration.
Haley endorsed Trump for the president, Trump for president,
despite having criticized him harshly when she ran against him
in the party primaries. That's a pretty polite way of
putting it. Papeo has been mentioned in some
media reports as a possible Defense Secretary and has been
also seen as a potential Republican presidential
candidate before he announced in April 2023 he would not run.
I would imagine that if he was Defense Secretary, the word
Ukraine would blow up even worse. president-elect Donald
Trump said on Saturday that former Republican presidential
contender Nikki Haley and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
will not be asked to join his administration.
I will not be inviting former Ambassador Nikki Haley or former
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to join the Trump
administration, which is currently in formation.
Trump posted on social media. I very much enjoyed and
appreciated working with them previously and would like to
thank them for their service to our country.
In other words, you're fired. Trump is meeting with potential
candidates to serve in his administration before his
January 20th inauguration as president.
Reuters reported Friday that Trump met with prominent
investor Scott Bessette, who is a potential U.S.
Treasury Secretary nominee. And then he goes on and says
Haley, a former South Carolina governor who served as U.S.
ambassador to the United Nations under Trump, endorsed Trump for
president despite having criticized him harshly when she
ran against him in party primaries.
Yeah, she's pretty brutal. OK, well, that's pretty cool
stuff. Those who aren't going to be
invited back for a second run. I think it's important that he
gets people in these cabinet positions that are freedom
minded and so much so for the UF part of this.
Now let's get back to John Rackman just a little bit here.
Now, here's an article from Newsweek going back to July
31st, 2023. Former U.S. intelligence chief
weighs in on UFO hearings. So you can see here, even after
Trump's out of office, Ratcliffe is kind of keeping himself in
circulation a little bit. I think he has a personal
interest in this. This articles by Alex Phillips,
U.S. News reporter a former national
intelligence director under Donald Trump, did not deny
claims made in a recent hearing on the government's alleged
knowledge of alien life when asked about them, responding
that the government has more information than they're
sharing. The government has more
information than it's sharing. That's a far cry from what we've
been told by Arrow, isn't it? No such thing as UFOs.
Speaking on Fox News on Sunday this course last year, John
Ratcliffe, who served as U.S. intelligence chief between 2020
and 2021, declined to go into detail about the veracity of
allegations, citing national security restrictions, but
called for greater transparency on the issues raised.
In a session of the House Oversight Committee on
Wednesday, part of an investigation into claims
regarding UFOs, witnesses testified that the government
had been aware of non human activity since the 19 1830's.
The hearing also discussed allegations that a top secret
military program already had a fully intact UFO in its
possession, including biological material that was not from our
planet, and that there had been attempts to reverse engineer
this technology for human use. Now think about that.
Just imagine if these idiots have non have non human
biological material and they're and they're what if they're
trying to reverse engineer it? Look what they did with the
Spanish flu victims they found buried up in Alaska, digging up
those corpses from 100 years ago trying to and I think they did
reverse engineer and bring that virus back to life, weaponizing
things like smallpox like it needs any help.
So we have some really bad people in there I think that are
trying to keep the stuff to themselves and the way, you
know, the best, the the the best disinfectant for this is just
transparency, sunlight. Someone like John Radcliffe
could come in here, I think and really kind of open the windows
up a little bit. I mean, if you can live long
enough. It says.
The alien probe was launched after David Grush, a United
States Air Force veteran who previously worked at the
National Reconnaissance Office, told News Nation that the
government had had retrieved several non human origin
technical vehicles, some of which contain dead pilots.
In the opening statement to his testimony in front of Congress
on Wednesday, he said underoath that the US government is
operating with secrecy above congressional oversight with
regards to unidentified aerial phenomena.
UAP, the Department of Defense and NASA have publicly stressed
that they have no evidence of alien life or that there is a
government program to reverse engineer alien materials.
Well, they just figure they have a license to lie.
The government, government has more information than a sharing,
Ratcliffe told Maria Bartiroma. Unfortunately, the Biden
administration made the decision to really not reveal much, and
now you have these House Republicans having to have these
public hearings to talk about more of this information.
Yeah, we got three UFO shot down and nobody can tell us about it.
I will say this, I believe there should be more transparency on
the issue, but not full transparency, he added, noting
the governments national security duties question.
On whether the federal government was aware of the
origins of supposed UAP sightings, he said.
There's a lot of things that are unexplained.
I've gone to the edge of talking about information that's
classified. I can't go over that line.
To me, that's just an admission. He's telling you.
Yeah, they have stuff. Newsweek approached the Pentagon
via e-mail for comment on Monday.
DoD spokesman Susan Gao, boy her name a lot, previously told
Newsweek that it had not discovered any verifiable
information to substantiate claims that any programs
regarding the possession or reverse engineering of any
extraterrestrial materials have existed in the past or exist
currently. The Department of Defense takes
public interest in UAP seriously, she added.
Sure they do. The Department is fully
committed to openness and accountability to the American
people, which it must balance with this obligation to protect
sensitivities, information sources and methods.
And don't forget the Department of Defense, the people who did
multiple above ground atomic and nuclear explosions contaminated
vast areas of of the earth, exposed probably millions of
people to cancer causing radiation.
Yes, those people, they really take you seriously.
Alongside garage, two other witnesses have test had gave
testimony at Wednesday's hearing.
David Flavor, a former U.S. Navy commanding officer, said he
observed the tic Tac shaped object off the coast of San
Diego in 2004. And Ryan Graves, the executive
director of the Academy of the advocacy organization Americans
for Aerospace. But according to the congressman
Co leading the investigation, there was supposed to be double
the number of witnesses just a week before the hearing took
place. Representative Tim Burchett, a
Tennessee Republican, was previously spoken, has
previously spoken out about UFOs, suggested to News Nation
on Sunday that some have been influenced not to appear.
Have to ask yourself, what are they hiding?
We had one tell us that he'd received a call from I guess
maybe the Pentagon and he or she decided that maybe it wasn't
best that they were on there, he said, adding we just had so many
roadblocks. In January, Sean Kirkpatrick,
director of the Old Domain Anomaly Resolution Office where
they resolved nothing, testified to Congress that there had been
a rising number of UFO reports, with his office investigating
650 incidents. The AARO is a government office
under the Secretary of Defense that investigates UA.
PS Sure does. He produced 2 examples of
military sightings, one of which remained inconclusive and
another which was determined to be a commercial airliner.
Wow, out of 650. That's really good.
Reacting to the claims in the witness testimony, scientists
have remained skeptical of business by alien life while
keeping the door open to the possibility, noting a lack of
concrete evidence produced during the hearing.
Well, they were limited to what they could do.
I mean, you're, you're quizzing these guys about all kinds of
information that's classified. They may not want to get locked
up for the rest of their life by revealing the stuff.
Let's just take a look at what the upcoming hearings going to
be here and what kind of role someone like John Ratcliffe
could have in this as far as disclosure goes.
Now we have these UFO hearings coming up on November 13th.
That's just next week. This article from
defence@scoop.com says former naval commander agrees to
testify with others at upcoming UAP hearing.
The House Oversight and Accountability Committee is
planning to host the hearing on November 13th, this Defence
Scoop has learned. Articles written by Brandy
Vincent dated November 6th, 2024 says retired Navy Admiral
Timothy Galdot is one of the multiple witnesses set to
testify at a congressional hearing next week about
government transparency concerns and reports of unidentified
anomalous phenomena. UAP we call UFO that could
endanger US National Security. I believe he was a
meteorologist. Two sources familiar with the
plans, who requested anonymity to discuss the hearing before
it's held, told Defense Group on Wednesday that it will be led by
Republicans on the House Oversight and Accountability
Committee on November 13th, without sharing more information
about who is testifying and why the hearing is being hosted now.
A spokesperson from that committee separately confirmed
in an e-mail that it is scheduled for next Wednesday.
The Cyber Committee and National Security Committee subcommittee
will hold a joint hearing on UPS on November 13th.
Cyber Subcommittee Chairwoman Nancy Mace Republic in South
Carolina and National Security Subcommittee Chairman Glenn
Grothman, Republican Wisconsin, will Co chair the hearing, the
spokesperson told Defense Group. They said the lawmakers hold
hope to provide more information to the public in coming days.
The Pentagon has a complicated history with UPA, with UAP or
the modern term UFOs that accounts for transit medium
objects. The upcoming hearing will follow
several that lawmakers have convened in recent years, which
came largely in response to mounting public pressure, an
alert raised by former defense officials about seemingly
unexplainable objects increasingly threatening
America's military assets and personnel in the modern area.
One of the officials Defense Group spoke to suggested that
some of the topics that will be raised in this next meeting will
likely be will likely include transparency issues associated
with the Pentagon's and intelligence community's
handling of UAP reports and ongoing investigations.
Calls for more congressional oversight of the executive
branch on UAP and examples of how much phenomena have
presented challenges to flight safety and the real world
military operations. Look, I don't think it's even
with the executive. I think the power really here is
held in the intelligence communities and the Defense
Departments. That's why if you get somebody
like John Ratcliffe in charge of the CIA, other than dismantling
it, this might be our best option.
At least we can open this up a little bit and less.
Of course, the president just steps up and starts
declassifying the stuff on his own.
Defense Department spokesman declined to answer Defense
groups questions on Wednesday regarding whether any current
officials, particularly from the All Domain Anomaly Resolution
Office, were asked to or will serve as witnesses.
They directed the inquiries to congressional spokespersons, who
declined to identify those tap to testify.
Everything's got to be a big cover up.
Gallaudet previously LED Naval Meteorology and Oceanography
Command and served as oceanographer of the Navy.
Kind of a big deal, I suppose. He also deployed on multiple
tours afloat during his career in uniform and later served for
about a year and a half as the Senate confirmed Assistant
Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere after retiring
from the military in 2000. 2017 in his retirement gold.
It has been candid about his experiences while on active duty
observing now verified video footage of UAP and unidentified
submerged objects, US OS captured by colleagues and his
aims to help destigmatize discussion of this previously
taboo topic across the military. Well, good for him.
I don't know, maybe we're making some positive strides here.
I don't know. Take a look at one last article
here and then we'll wrap this up.
So we're talking about all this cloak and dagger stuff about
getting disclosure about these. It's just a web of intelligence
agencies and Defense Department contractors that have access to
the stuff and that seem to be hiding it from us and our own
politicians find it impossible to get access to what's going on
here with these UFOs. Just to give you a little
background and ask, I had a couple questions I wanted to ask
ChatGPT. Just to give us a idea of the
environment within we are working.
I ask what is the CIA budget? Well, it says the CIA budget is
part of the broader U.S. intelligence community budget,
which includes the National Intelligence Program, NIP, and
the Military Intelligence program.
For fiscal year 2024, the total intelligence budget was
approximately $106.3 billion, compromising both civilian and
military allocations. Especially, the appropriated
amount for the NIP was around 76 1/2 billion dollars, while the
NIP received 29.8 billion. The CI as budget details, while
incorporated within the NIP, are not broken down publicly for
security reasons. Typically, these figures are
disclosed only in aggregate with other intelligence activities to
maintain operational confidentiality.
Wow. In other words, you don't even
get to know. But we'll tell you this, We'll
tell you that we're spending about $106 billion a year for
these different intelligence agencies.
Now you figure there's maybe 350 million people in this country.
I think the last I checked, about 100 to 120 million
actually pay income taxes. So that's close to 1000 bucks
apiece you're paying out if you paid income taxes last year to
support an intelligence agency that wants to do nothing but
hide UFO disclosure from you. Crazy stuff.
I asked how many people work at the CIA.
Well, the exact number of CIA employees is classified to
protect national security and maintain operational secrecy.
Estimates suggest that the workforce comprises roughly
20,000 to 22,000 employees, though the true number may vary.
The CIA size, like other intelligence agencies,
fluctuates based on the needs of national security and global
intelligence operations. Yeah, just whatever they can get
by with. So pretty good sized business,
22,000 people. And so, you know, we've talked a
little bit here about these spatial access programs.
I guess they call them SA. PS I thought it was, I thought
it was SPACS. I guess I was wrong.
That's a business deal. So anyway, asking about this
special access programs they have, you know where they, they
dump all this money into something and then nobody in
Congress can see it except for maybe like 6 people or
something. It says a Special Access
Program, or SAP, is a highly classified program within the US
government that significantly restricts access to specific
information or activities to protect national security.
Or maybe the people inside the program, SA PS exceed the
security measures of standard classified information,
requiring enhanced protocols for access and management.
In other words, nobody's going to know what you're doing.
SA PS come in two main types, acknowledged SA PS and UN
acknowledged SA PS. Does that make you feel better?
Acknowledged. The existence of the program is
publicly known, but the details are classified unacknowledged.
The program's existence and details are both classified and
not publicly disclosed, often referred to as black programs.
Does that sound like a democracy to you?
Access to SAP is limited to individuals who not only hold
the appropriate security clearance but also have a
demonstrated need to know. The information within these
programs is compartmentalized to minimize the risk of
unauthorized exposure. If that's not the deep state, I
don't know what is. These programs can involve
sensitive military operations, advanced technological research,
or other crucial intelligence activities.
SAPS are designed to protect highly sensitive projects from
potential espionage or threats. And a threat might be you, a
voter. You see, this is what I'm
talking about with the deep state, and people are still
foolish enough sometimes to leave comments and say, well,
the deep state is a conspiracy theory.
A conspiracy theory. Look, there's too much secrecy
in our government and they're spending our money.
I asked. I said how much money is spent
on ASPs because, you know, you always want to follow the money.
Well, according to good old ChatGPT says the budget details
for special access programs SA PS are highly classified and are
not publicly disclosed due to the nature of the programs,
extreme sensitivity, and national security implications.
While the overall US defense and intelligent budgets include
allocations for SA PS, these are grouped under broader line.
Items are marked as classified to prevent potential security
risk. In other words, no
accountability. Estimates suggest that billions
of dollars are allocated annually for SA PS encompassing
advanced military technologies, clandestine operations, and
intelligence activities. However, exact figures and
breakdowns are restricted from public view to maintain secrecy
and protect the programs from adversaries.
You tell me who serves who. In general, the total US defense
budget, what can exceed $800 billion annually, includes
funding for SA PS alongside other classified initiatives.
So billions. Oh, by the way, here's your
Defense Department, $800 billion annually.
Remember, I think it's 2.2, three, 2.3 trillion that they
can't account for. But just the $800 billion
annually, remember got about 100 million people paying taxes.
Really. I mean, they're paying in more
than they get back. What's that about $8000 each for
those folks? Even if we divided this, even if
we assume over assume on the illegal aliens that are here
currently and working and all the other things and just let's
assume we have 400 million people in this country, we might
that's $2000, That's $2000 per person that they're spending on
the Defense Department per year. Now think about all the low wage
earners in this country and then think about $800 billion
annually just on the Defense Department budget.
And within that budget, we don't know how many millions and
billions are going into these spatial access programs that
probably the president of the United States doesn't even have
access to. So the whole point about John
Ratcliffe is maybe, just maybe, if we can get one good guy in
there in one of these departments, he can find the
thread to pull on that takes this thing apart.
We can only hope. Until next time.
This is UFO warning over and out.