Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
Today's topic Top UFO Stories of 2019 I found this article on
foxnews.com and it begins. It says 2019 was a big year for
UFO coverage, ranging from the US Navy acknowledging for the
first time that leaked videos were real, to former and current
politicians weighing in on what the military knows and a wave of
people attempting to storm Area 51.
No one can say for certain life exists outside of this planet,
but the public's interest levels in the subject have likely never
been higher, the article goes on.
First quarter January saw the release of newly declassified
documents from the Pentagon that revealed the Department of
Defense funded projects that investigated UFO's, wormholes,
alternative dimensions, and a host of other subjects that are
often the topics of conspiracy theorist.
Excuse me one minute please. Conspiracy theorist?
Are you kidding me? Department of Defense funded
projects that investigated UFO's, wormholes, alternate
dimensions, any host of other subjects?
I'm not sure, man, but I'm not sure who the conspiracy theories
are here. If there's a conspiracy theory,
it is the conspiracy to cover up UFO data, metadata, and
information. It is the conspiracy to not
disclose. The article goes on.
The Defense Intelligence Agency released 38 research titles on
January 18th. This is 38 separate, reports
kids, following a Freedom of Information Act request from
Steven Alfred, director of the Federation of American
Scientists Project on Government Secrecy.
The research was funded by the Department of Defense under its
Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program.
A Tip Now if a tip sounds familiar, you can simply go back
and look at a number of our podcast.
The former head of a tip allegedly now works for Tom
Delong's group to the Academy of Stars.
The connections just go on and on and on, the article
continues. The existence of a tip was
initially described by the New York Times and Political in
2017. Now when I hear that it was
initially described by the New York Times and Politico, my
warning bells go off. These are two left wing news
outlets close, very close in my opinion to the Deep state.
And we see this pattern over and over of them getting the story,
whether it was former FBI Director Jim Comey sharing with
the a friend of his who then published his his negative
opinions toward Donald Trump, or whether it is the constant
onslaught of negativity that we see toward a sitting group of
politicians on the other side of the aisle.
Anything I hear from Politico or New York Times, I'm
automatically suspect toward just because I see how they
cover every single story they come across.
So why should I trust them about something they print about the
UFO phenomenon or a secret government study that's been put
in place to study UFO's? It says the existence of a tip
was initially was initially described by the New York Times
and political in 2017. It was subsequently reported by
Fox News, any number of other news outlets that the Pentagon
had secretly set up a program to investigate UFO's at the request
of former Senator Harry Reid, Democrat Nevada.
Also keep in mind Harry Reid was instrumental in the funding of
Bob Bigelow and I believe NIDS. You can go back and look that
up, but there's a lot of this. It almost looks like
self-serving motives when it comes to funding UFO research.
And you can see a dangerous trend where UFO funding has been
privatized and monetized from the government to private
organizations. And the problem with that is you
can't get a four year request. They don't have to respond to
this four year request. So once that UFO research falls
into the hands of private organizations, it's theirs.
It's it becomes proprietary. I see this as an extremely
dangerous trend and something that we saw happen over and over
again and we saw it being exposed throughout 2019.
Now the article goes on. It says a Pentagon spokesman
said the UFO program ended in 2012, though the New York Times
said the Defense Department still investigates potential
episodes of unidentified flying objects.
While certainly it would hope that they do, second quarter,
several months later the US Navy announced it was drafting new
guidelines for pilots and other employees to report encounters
with unidentified aircraft. There have been a number of
reports of unauthorized and or unidentified aircraft entering
various military controlled ranges and designated airspace
in recent years, the Navy said in an April statement to
Politico, which first reported the move.
For safety and security concerns, the Navy and the US
Air Force takes these reports very seriously and investigates
each and every report as part of its effort, it told political.
The Navy is updating and formalizing the process by which
reports of any such suspended incursions can be made to the
cognizant authorities. A new message to the fleet that
will detail the steps for reporting and draft.
The Navy also said it's taking more proactive approach.
Is taking a more proactive approach in briefing lawmakers,
including several senators who were briefed in June.
Well, that's amazing because remember we had, I believe it
was Representative Walker who was complaining publicly that he
had asked the Navy for information regarding the Tic
Tac Ufo's and they just totally stonewalled him.
You can go back and look at one of the podcasts on that, too,
Representative Walker. The Department of Defense is
always concerned about maintaining positive
identification of all aircraft and our operating environment,
as well as identifying any foreign capability that may be a
threat to home to the homeland, spokesman Christopher Sherwood
told the New York Post in May. The Department will continue to
investigate, through normal procedures, reports of
unidentified aircraft encountered by UF military
aviators in order to ensure defense of the homeland and
protect against strategic surprise by our nation's
adversaries. I have to tell you, I really
don't like this use of the word homeland.
It takes me back to some kind of this crazy.
I mean, I hate to say it, but it reminds me of some of this crazy
Nazi stuff that you would hear about or crazy Stalin's term you
would hear about homeland. I do not like that I never heard
the founding fathers talk about the homeland.
OK, they should just use a legal, clinical definition here.
Borders are within the borders of the United States or whatever
active military theater that that they happen to be in.
It's just one more way that the that the powers that be are
constantly changing and tweaking the narrative to control our
thoughts and our perceptions. It goes on, former Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Christopher Mellon
told Fox and Friends in May. The Navy has a right to be
concerned about unexplained sightings.
We know that Ufo's exist. This is no longer an issue, said
Mellon, who has written on the topic and is associated with The
History Channel Series unidentified at the time.
The issue is, why are they here? Where are they coming from and
what is the technology behind these devices that we are
observing? Well, from my perspective, how
do we even know that they are devices?
We haven't even determined that yet.
Maybe some of them are, but a lot of these things don't appear
to be devices in the way that we think of as devices at all.
They have a lot more call, have a lot more in common with bowl
lightning than they do a US fighters jet.
It goes on. They were there are there are
indications, Mellon said that the odds reported that a pods
2014 and 2015 mentioned in the New York Times report.
We're doing things that aren't possible in this physical realm.
Well, you can say that again. The speeds that were reported
about 5000 mph, according to Mellon, were only sustainable
for about an hour by an aircraft in the air, and these objects
would be flying around all day long, the pilot said.
It goes on and says pilots observing these craft are
absolutely mystified and that comes through clearly in their
public statements, Mellon continued.
In June 2019, Reed, now retired, expressed his desire for
lawmakers to hold public hearings into what the military
knows. They would be surprised how the
American people would accept it, he said during a wide-ranging
interview with Nevada Radio with a Nevada radio station.
People from their individual states would accept it.
Then we go on to the third quarter, it says.
What started as an Internet joke in July 10th to see them aliens
turn into a headline grabbing Storm Area 51 event in
September. Although more than 2 million
people signed up on Facebook saying they would attend the
viral phenomena event, a motley group of about 100 alien chasers
converged on the back gate of the secret site early September
20th. According to Las Vegas Review
Journal, only a few people were arrested.
People came from all over the world to attend the viral event,
which generated security concerns and garner global
attention. We figure Mars needs women so
we're here to so we're here if they want to beam us up, one
woman told Fox News in September.
Yeah, I think we could have left that story out.
A lot of it was just silly nose and stupidity but Fox felt like
they needed to print it here. Okay on to the fourth quarter,
it says Americans said in September and September Got out
poll They were becoming increasingly skeptical that the
government knows more than it is letting on as it pertains to
UFO's. And an ex punk rocker may be the
one who opens the proverbial Pandora's box.
A spokesman for To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science
TTSA, cofounded by former Blink 182 singer Tom Delong, told the
New York Times in September that it certainly had obtained exotic
material samples from UFO's, but no further details were given at
that time. And man, that paragraph right
there leads to a lot of questions.
First off, where did they get the materials from?
What are they doing with these materials?
And should we really, should the world trust a former punk rock
singer? Well, they guess they call it
punk rock. Should they trust this cat with
a bunch of UFO material when we've already talked about how
important these exotic materials can be, how much, how much
wealth can be generated just from the recipe from these
things? I mean, is this something that
we want to trust some random guy off the street with?
The article goes on. Later that month, the UF, the US
Navy acknowledged that 3UFO videos that were released by
former Blink 182 singer Tom Delonge and published by the New
York Times are of real, unidentified objects.
Personally, I have a major, major issue with this.
What in the world this Tom Delong, a private citizen, doing
with these UFO videos taken from U.S.
Navy fighter pilots? Cockpit cameras?
How did he get them? Why is he so spatial?
And can you see this repeated connection between the New York,
The New York Times, a newspaper that undeniably just seems to
hate Donald Trump? Seems to despise rule, America
and anybody of a conservative Ben.
They are left wing to the core. Just read just just read the
paper. It is A1 sided paper in my
opinion. Why did they suddenly, why are
they settling in position of this valuable data, this this
earth shattering data that the Navy says yes UFO's exist.
So why was the New York, The New York Times and a former rock
band leader chosen to reveal this?
Why not put it on Coast to Coast AM?
Why not put up a public website? Why not give it to MUFON in
North Fork? Why were these guys chosen?
And why was Tom Delong allowed to splatter the watermark of his
company all over these videos? Can I please watch one of these
videos without having to see that giant obnoxious TTSA
watermark stuck in the corner of this video?
Can I do that? Since this video originated as
Taxpayer Property, can somebody explain to me why Tom Delong was
allowed to Monetize Taxpayer Property?
It's like a squatter or something just shows up at your
house and says, hey, this is mine, listen, this is an
obnoxious development in the UFO investigative phenomena.
This is not good. This is not a good thing.
The article goes on and it says the Navy considers the phenomena
contained depicted in these three videos as identified by
Navy spokesman Joseph Gradisher told The Black Vault, the
website dedicated to declassified government
documents. When we got the Black Vault, why
didn't the Black Vault get these videos?
I'm pretty sure they could have posted them without that
obnoxious watermark. The article goes on and says the
Navy. It says the Navy considers A
phenomena contained depicted in those three videos as
unidentified, Navy spokesman Joseph Gradisher told the Black
Vault, a website dedicated to declassified documents.
Gradisher Gradisure added that the unidentified aerial
phenomenon terminology is used. OK, unidentified aerial
phenomenon. This is another thing that
irritates me to know in they're trying to control the narrative.
We talked about this 100 times, unidentified aerial phenomenon.
You know, what unidentified flying object works just fine.
We don't need to change the terms here, but they say they
use this terminology used because it provides the basic
descriptor for the sightings. Observations of unauthorized
unidentified aircraft objects that have been observed entering
operating in airspace of various military controlled training
ranges. Well, if they're militarily
controlled, then why are they just coming in and out of your
range like you mean nothing to them?
That's what I have to say. And if you haven't got the power
to control these things, why in the world would you think you
had the power to name them? The videos in question, known as
Flirt, Flare 1, Gimble and Go Fast were originally released to
the New York Times and to the TTSA.
Excuse me, Why? I mean, could these incurious
authors take 5 minutes of their time and just ask a simple
question? Why did the New York Times get
these videos? Why did Tom Delong and the TTSA
get those videos? Why couldn't the government have
just posted them on a random website like NASA does?
Really. The first video of the
unidentified object was taken November 14th, 2004 and shot by
an F eighteens gun camera. The second video was taken on
January 21st, 2015 and shows another aerial vehicle when
pilots commenting on how strange it is.
And the third video was taken on January 21st, 2015, was unclear
whether the third video was of the same object or different
one. In October, the TTSA signed a
deal with the US Army to study its purported extraterrestrial
discoveries. Does this sound like a revolving
door to you? It's a little disturbing to me.
So that military, the Navy. the US Navy randomly gives Tom De
Long and his friends these three videos and says, by the way,
Ufo's are real while they are denying US Congressman access to
the same kind of information. Then a few months later, the
Army signs a deal with old Tom. They're going to build invisible
tanks together. You can go back and look that up
on the podcast too. This is incestuous.
In my opinion, this is not a correct situation. the US
military should not be handpicking people and former
employees of the government to be in charge of these UFO
research projects, especially while they are in revolt to the
US Congress and denying Congress access to the same kind of
information. This is ridiculous.
It goes on and says November saw the publication of an explosive
report that detailed the involvement of two unknown
individuals. This goes back to the Men in
Black podcast MIB Look It Up, who told several naval officers
who witnessed a 2004 event known as a USS Nimitz UFO incident to
delete evidence. Earlier this month, Chris
Rudakowski and Canadian science writer and Ufologist donated his
collection of more than 20,000 UFO reports filed over the past
three decades, plus another 10,000 UFO related documents
from the Canadian government, including the socalled Falcon
incident, which Buttowski said beats even Roswell.
That seems to be the little thing they tossed in at the end
there. These were the highlights,
according to Fox, of the UFO phenomena for 2019.
But I have to tell you. The overarching thing that we
see in 2019 is former military and intelligence government
employees leaving their employment, joining private
corporations. And there's multiple ones out
there now that are supposedly dedicated to the research and
study of the UFO phenomena, UFO metadata and craft crash
material from UF O's. So you have these former deep
state employees leaving the government.
Instead of joining the revolving door of military contractors
like we've seen and known about for many, many years, they're
going a level above this. Now they're joining the ranks of
UFO researchers, and they're going right back to that
revolving door. And they're being given, they're
being given things such as the UFO video that Tom Delong's
group has. Possibly they're being either
given or sold UFO material. Delong has talked about getting
material from government sources and now that material and data
has gone from being in the hands of the government, an entity
that we can send for you to and sometimes get disclosure all
this information, all this power is being shifted into the hands
of private companies that are largely made-up of former deep
state employees. This new group, this new private
company made-up of these former deep state employees still has
fantastic access to all their old friends and all their old
sources back in the government which they can profit from
handsomely. But now they also have in their
position this newly monetized or this newly monetized data and
UFO material that has now off limits to the public.
So can you see what's happening here?
UFO information, data, investigated reports and most
importantly UFO material. Actual material that has come
supposedly from UFO craft has gone from being in the in the
position of government agencies to which we have some reach
toward. It's gone from being government
property to being private property to which we have no
right to. It would be as if you woke up
one morning and every single Rd. in America was a toll road and
you had to pay whatever they told you to pay in order to get
in your car, go to work. I want you to think about that
for a few minutes. That is the most dangerous trend
that I see and this whole UFO phenomena for 2019, and that is
the privatization and monetization of UFO data and
meta material. So it doesn't doesn't matter how
many UF O's we see. It doesn't matter how many UF
O's we report. Doesn't even matter how much we
understand about the UFO phenomena.
That if all of that knowledge and all of that evidence is out
of our reach of the ordinary person and out of the out of the
reach of the public good, where are we headed with this stuff?
Until next time, this is UFO warning saying over and out.